The Right to Abortion vs The Reality of Abortion

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (58 posts)
  1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years ago

    Those who are protesting and fighting for the right and the freedom to abort an oopsie, know that it is more than just than oopsie. It's a human life. Abortion is not good for the soul of the child, the mother's psyche or the mother's body.

    Yet protesters scream, yell and carry on. However, there are many implications and consequence to consider.

    Can the votes of the citizenry in their individual states make better choices than the federal government regarding abortion matters?

    I would say yes. Abortion issues are sensitive and I agree that individual states should decide upon what is best for their state.

    Why not?

    1. gmwilliams profile image83
      gmwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I vehemently disagree.    States should never have the ultimate power regarding abortion.  Abortion should be decided federally.   It is a very dangerous thing for states to decide on abortion.   Abortion ought to be CODIFED in federal law.

      Women should never be forced into pregnancy & motherhood.   All children should be wanted & planned.  Abortion is a necessary medical exercise.  Birth control isn't 100% effective-accidents DO happen.  Why should women be penalized for a mistake?  That is the height of barbaric draconianism.  Reproductive access is a sign of enlightenment & intelligence.

      1. MizBejabbers profile image90
        MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        I agree with you. After working for a state legislature for nearly 30 years, I strongly believe that they do not have the sense to make decisions for a woman's needs. They base their decisions on their religion and, in many cases, misogynist beliefs. In many of these states a woman may be forced to carry a dead baby to term. Or she may die because her doctor can't legally terminate an ectopic pregnancy. This is murder by legislature. If we are willing to let these prejudiced members of state legislatures decide our fates, we should remove these words from the pledge of allegiance:  "One nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all." Those words are becoming a mockery by our Supreme Court.

    2. James A Watkins profile image87
      James A Watkinsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      You are so right. In our system of government, it is only legislatures that make laws. Roe was decided horribly wrong from the beginning, as many leftist judges have admitted. Elected representatives of We the People of each state should make abortion law. Abortion is a hideous, evil, vile thing.  It is the killing of innocent human beings. A Stain on our National Soul. The American Holocaust.

    3. abwilliams profile image69
      abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I completely agree Kathryn. It takes a heavy toll on everyone it touches, there are never any winners, I know of too many who have had their lives destroyed by it.
      Those who like to pretend that abortion is something worth celebrating
      and, supposedly, celebrate theirs, may be the most broken of all!
      I can't imagine facing God on judgement day {and I believe we all will} and explaining why I fought so hard for the right to kill another human being, the most innocent and vulnerable of the human species, a baby, God's greatest creation :`(

    4. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      "I would say yes. Abortion issues are sensitive and I agree that individual states should decide upon what is best for their state."

      But the Right will not stop there, they also want to control a woman's ability to go from a restricted state to one where abortion rights are recognized. What is best for your state should STAY within your state and not interfere with others, Right?

      This is a incursion by morally priggish and hypocritical evangelical Christians to remake the American society in their image, and I for one will not have it.

      They, as alluded to by "Uncle Clearance" will start to attack contraceptives and birth control. The goal is Confining sexual relations solely to the marriage bed. Yet, no one tells me what to do in areas of my private concern. And I hope that the vast majority of women see the direction this is going and put a stop to it before they become virtually hogtied with their own umbilical cords.

      And we all know that when women lose control of reproductive choices it will have an adverse effect on what parity they had actually enjoyed within this society.

      But that is what your people want, isn't it? We all can go back to the future together. Yes, this issue is "live" and the anger and disappointment of women being virtually dragged into slavery need to be expressed at the polls this November to the effect that they won't even vote for a Republican as the local dog catcher. This is war and now the "kid gloves" are off.

    5. Sharlee01 profile image86
      Sharlee01posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      In my view, the issue is being blown out of proportion somewhat. Lots of  "next they will do this". Anyway, I think that the issue should, (must be) put on the ballot in all states as to what their abortion laws should be. I don't feel that just leaving the issue to state legislators is appropriate. Let the people have a majority say in any given state.

      1. MizBejabbers profile image90
        MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Even a "majority" should not be able to rule on an individual case. This is still murder by legislation when the life of the mother is at stake. This should be between the woman and her doctor. Religion should not enter into this, and these laws are governed by religion.

        1. gmwilliams profile image83
          gmwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          THANK YOU, A VOICE OF REASON.

  2. Kathleen Cochran profile image74
    Kathleen Cochranposted 2 years ago

    Genesis 2: God created all the other animals then said, let us create man in our image. He formed man from the dust of the ground and then breathed into him the breath of life and man became a living soul. The animals did not. And man received his soul after he was formed.

    1. MizBejabbers profile image90
      MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Kathleen, please explain your intent. While I don't believe that a soul can enter a zygote, and I believe that life begins at birth, I'm not sure of your meaning.

      1. Misbah786 profile image81
        Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

        Sorry for interrupting the discussion. I understand we're not talking about Islam here, but it doesn't really matter because Christianity and Islam are quite similar in many respects. Above all, because both religions are Abrahamic, I consider Christians to be my holy brothers  and sisters .

        So because the world has now transformed into a global village, possibly different perspectives can be heard and appreciated. smile

        According to Islam, the soul enters the body of the fetus during the fourth month of pregnancy. (While the fetus is still in the mother's womb.) The following is the rule on abortion in Islamic law (Shari'ah):

        Abortion is classified into two stages:

        a) Abortion after the soul (Ruh) enters the body of fetus

        b) Abortion before to the soul's entrance into the fetus

        Before discussing the abortion judgment with relation to these two stages, it should be noted that the soul (Ruh) enters the fetus at the 120 day (4 months) from conception, according to Shari'ah.

        In the verse Allah states the stages of development of the embryo in the womb of the mother. Allah Almighty says:

        “ And indeed, We created humankind from an extract of clay, then placed each ˹human˺ as a sperm-drop in a secure place, then We developed the drop into a clinging clot ˹of blood˺, then developed the clot into a lump ˹of flesh˺, then developed the lump into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh, then We brought it into being as a new creation (by breathing life into it, i.e. soul)So Blessed is Allah, the Best of Creators. (Surah al-Mu’minun, 12/13/14).

        The ruling on abortion at stage ,when the soul enters the fetus, which is 120 days, is clearly illegal and equates to murder because it ends up taking an innocent life. All of the Islamic scholars have uniformly denounced such horrible act.

        Some contemporary scholars have given a dispensation to abort the pregnancy after 120 days, in the situation where the life of the mother is in certain and absolute danger. This is based on the Juristic principle stated in the books of Usul al-Fiqh (laws of Fiqh):

        “If one is overtaken by two evils, one should choose the lesser of the two” (al-Ashbah wa al-Naza’ir, P.98)

        https://zawaj.com/articles/abortion_permitted_when.html

        1. IslandBites profile image93
          IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Glad you shared.

          1. Misbah786 profile image81
            Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Thank you, IslandBites smile

        2. abwilliams profile image69
          abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Hi Misbah, it's not an interruption, you are adding to the conversation.
          Thanks for sharing, very interesting.

          1. Misbah786 profile image81
            Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            This is so kind of you, A B Williams. Much appreciated! smile

        3. tsmog profile image87
          tsmogposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Interesting and thanks for sharing!! Yes, ensoulmement does vary with different religions as well the sects and denominations within them. It ranges from conception to the seventh month from my understanding.

          Ensoulment (Yes, it is a Wikipedia article and some give no credence to them. Yet, it is inclusive of varying views giving perspective there are many views for religions, sects of religions, and denominations too while each deserves respect. It is a beginning if one decides to journey a road of discovery while they do have their references listed at the article end.)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensoulment


          And, then there comes personhood too. Yes, the actual physical formation of life seems beginning with actual melding of the egg with the sperm to zygote to a fetus and so forth is what is debated with the legality of abortion at least here in the U.S. That is what is 'seen' and a picture is worth 1,000 words (Ultrasound image)  and stimulates emotions. Yet, ensoulment and personhood are worthy of mention at least.

          The question of life's beginning can lead one down a road with twists and turns. For instance with general Christianity Spiritual life begins with acceptance of Jesus Christ into your life while others say it is when you are baptized submerged into water and then raised, yet takes place after the acceptance process. And, that is required for eternal life.
          So, in essence what I am saying is Life is complex. Seems, there is:

          Physical life
          Ensoulment
          Personhood
          Spiritual life

          Those of least are the basic tenets of a beginning of Life, though each is different while are synergistic to a complete person while varies by religion and philosophy since there are atheist and humanist too. Thus, is complex when attempting to create a law to encompass each and all.

          1. Misbah786 profile image81
            Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Thank you so much, Tim smile

            I enjoyed reading your thoughts on this topic and thnx for sharing the link. Yes, I agree with you. Life is complex, “or” maybe, we, as humans, like to live it that way.
            If a fetus can move in his mother's womb, I assume he is already alive; I have never seen a lifeless person moving (just my thoughts on how I feel)

            I see atheists as lifelong researchers who seek truth and accept and listen to anything with an open mind. smile

            ….. And also I am not against of any religion because I feel they are all deeply rooted somewhere in the same place, simply separated by time and development. (Just my thoughts)

            In the end, I believe that the majority always wins, but it does not imply that the majority is always right. Sometimes we all just want to benefit ourselves, and breaking the laws, lying, and wrongdoings are some of the worst things we consider to be beneficial; but, such things do not last forever.

            So, in the end, I believe it can take a loooooonnnnnggggg time, but goodness always wins.

            It is always a pleasure to engage in discussion with you. smile

            Stay blessed!

        4. MizBejabbers profile image90
          MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Thank you, Misbah, for your religion's viewpoint of the discussion. I do find that interesting. But I still believe that if we pledge, "One nation, under God (no matter which god), indivisible, with liberty and justice for all," NO RELIGION should be involved. If the mother dies for need of an abortion, it is still murder by legislation.

          1. Misbah786 profile image81
            Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Thank you very much, Miss Doris. I suppose in most cases when individuals desire to conduct such an act as abortion are where the pregnancy is unplanned, thus one should be careful what they do. (Excluding the rape cases) If a mother conceived by mistake and is dissatisfied, she will seek for an abortion, but I feel that killing an innocent life to cover up one's mistake is a horrible idea and an immoral act.

            How can religion be left out when there are believers? You can't remove the phrase 'In God We Trust' off the dollar bill and coins and expect this issue to be handled without including religion; I don't think it's possible. smile

            By the way, according to Islamic law, it is permissible to abort a fetus after 120 days if the mother's life is in certain and extreme danger. (In my opinion, no religion is cruel enough to suggest or demand that a mother give birth to a baby when her own life is in danger.)

            Lots of Love and Blessings to you as always! smile

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

              "How can religion be left out when there are believers? You can't remove the phrase 'In God We Trust' off the dollar bill and coins and expect this issue to be handled without including religion; I don't think it's possible."

              I am sorry, Misbah 786, scripture talks about staying away from those that have the appearance of piety yet are faithless in regards to its true power. Jesus criticized hypocrites for chasing after minutia while ignoring the weightier matters of "the law".

              America's display of religious fervor and piety is nothing more than an extended cult more interested in power over others rather than truth and justice. So, nobody really cares what is printed on the back of the bill, if that message does not actually correlate with how you behave.

              There are differing sects of religion, 1, at least of every day of the year. Why should I give credence to any one and ignore the others? That is why in regarding affairs of the state, secularism is preferred.

              1. Misbah786 profile image81
                Misbah786posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                I've only expressed my opinions; nothing I've stated is a concluding statement. smile

                1. Credence2 profile image80
                  Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  Alright....

  3. Kathleen Cochran profile image74
    Kathleen Cochranposted 2 years ago

    Miz: It sounds like we agree. My point is for Christians not to ignore what the Bible explains clearly to be the point at which a human is different from the animals: when it becomes a soul - at its first breath.

    1. abwilliams profile image69
      abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      How do you explain Jeremiah 1:4 - The word of the Lord came to me, saying, "before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born, I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations."
      Yes, the latter part is Jeremiah being called by God, as a prophet, But, what of the first part, "before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart". Do you believe this was just meant for prophets and disciples, those called by God? But, as believers...aren't we all called "to go and make disciples of all Nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"? I believe this scripture applies to every single person, He, Creator God "knew us", "before he formed us in the womb"

      I don't understand this constant need to devalue life; I didn't before I became a Mom and I sure as heck did not after carrying my children, experiencing a living being inside of me, twisting and turning, kicking and elbowing, even kicking objects off of my huge belly, more than once.
      I can't comprehend devaluing any of these amazing experiences, in order to justify permanently ending their movement.

      1. MizBejabbers profile image90
        MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        We spiritualists explain Jeremiah 1:4 as speaking of the soul. The soul existed forever and will go on existing after our 3D body dies. It is not talking about the 3 dimensional temporary housing of the soul, a concept that most Christians can't comprehend. And although I grew up in a Southern Baptist Church (I got over it), I believe that this "Great Commission" only means an opportunity for nonbelievers to hear and convert. It doesn't mean forcing the Christian religion, or at least Paul's version of it, on other people like states are legislating on their populace. And I would like to know where many of these same Christians are getting their same "gun nut mentality." That wasn't in the New Testament that I read.
        Some women are not physically equipped to live through some of these "amazing experiences" that other women have. It will kill them. Been there, done that. I successfully had two children, but as a woman with adenomyosis, I was thankful for Roe v. Wade.

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Scripture is always interpreted in the way we that we prefer, Mis Biz.

          Most of the evangelical Christian interpretation of virtually everything is just so much BS.

          It is all a trick to get the ladies to surrender their freedom of autonomy over their own bodies. Is a zygote really self aware or have a soul?

          I have yet to hear an answer as to why laws made by the majority in one state apply to any individual seeking relief in another state where the laws do not apply? And,  I am waiting for an answer by the esteemed conservative posters in this thread.

          1. abwilliams profile image69
            abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            I remember you telling me once Cred, that I might be surprised to know, that you are a Christian.

            1. abwilliams profile image69
              abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              Also, what are you specifically referring to when you use the words, "seeking relief in other states"? Not following.

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                Let me clarify. Why do conservatives that live in Missouri, that forbade abortion, want to attempt to legislate a manner by which they can punish Missouri women and those that support them for obtaining an abortion in Illinois where it is legal? Isn't it enough to have the practice illegal within the jurisdiction within the state?

            2. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

              This is true, a great question.

              Not everyone professing to be Christian behaves consistently with the examples set forth in the scriptures. I have read and continue to read the book which in my relentless logic combined with divine guidance gives me the ability to sort the wheat from the chaff.   

              The right wing cult identified as evangelical Christianity in this country wants to consider Trump, among the most immoral and amoral man of a generation, as some sort of messiah, the "Greater Cyrus". As, if God would send us all a "dirty angel" as a sign for the end times. That is definitely the "wrong" religion, for me anyway.

              The other point is that I come to my conclusions through reason and examining the scriptures as I like to do my own thinking. That is solely my opinion and I recognize that the desire to ask as to the why and how of our existence is as individual as DNA. In scriptures, God challenges us to choose who we will serve. If God gives everyone that choice, who am I to deny it? As a result, I don't proselytize, nor try to strong arm people to adopt my beliefs, as no one can force anyone to believe anything. We must give everyone room to discover or not to discover these things for themselves.

              1. abwilliams profile image69
                abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                Now that's funny.
                No one that I know or know of, would EVER refer to Trump as the Messiah, that's hysterical. Kinda like referring to Hillary Clinton as Mother Teresa!
                They would laugh hysterically....as I am doing right now with the thought of it.
                Nope, nope, nope, only JC holds the title, Messiah!

                1. Credence2 profile image80
                  Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  We both are laughing....

                  1. abwilliams profile image69
                    abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                    If you know someone who believes that Trump is Messiah-like, keep an eye on them.....

                2. abwilliams profile image69
                  abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  I believe that Jesus is the Christ, the son of a living God. If you don't, that's fine! It is for all of us to either accept it or not...I will never force my beliefs on anyone, never have, won't start now.

                  1. Credence2 profile image80
                    Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

                    My point exactly....

        2. abwilliams profile image69
          abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          I never mentioned "forcing" religion on anyone and I was sharing my personal experiences. I've never thought a woman should die in order for another to live. But, that is so rare and no reason for over a billion abortions worldwide. As birth control, after the fact, is the most common reason given...
          ...and not sure why you are bringing up guns in this particular discussion. ???

    2. MizBejabbers profile image90
      MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you. I thought that was what you meant, but I wasn't sure.

  4. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years ago

    I predict in more enlightened ages women will realize the importance of no sex before marriage.

    This understanding alone will prevent the large number of abortions and the tragedies associated with them.

    Wouldn't that make an interesting book: true stories explaining the events which led to an abortion?

    1. abwilliams profile image69
      abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I don't know at this point Kathryn.  Maybe?
      I never thought I would see the day when abortion would be celebrated or the day when so many women, even Moms, would go to the mat in order to end a life, not honor a life. :.(

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
        Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        They are frenzied for the right to correct an oopsie.

        Oopses should not be made so easily.

        What we have is a society with too much freedom. No boundaries.
        No sex before marriage. Is that so hard?
        It used to be called Adultery.
        Not anymore.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HH3ruuml-R4

        1. Fayetteville Faye profile image60
          Fayetteville Fayeposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          "What we have is a society with too much freedom. No boundaries.
          No sex before marriage. Is that so hard?


          Ah yes, too much freedom.  Senegal,
          Honduras, Nicaragua, Egypt and El Salvador are countries with some of the most restrictive abortion laws.   Controlling reproductive freedom and fascism go hand in hand.  Something to strive for in many peoples opinion I suppose.
          The once-unthinkable prospect of U.S. women crossing the border to access safe, legal reproductive healthcare in Mexico, could soon become a reality.

          The far right is already drafting a model legislation blueprint for a Christian nationalist surveillance state.
          Looks like you won't have long to wait for your desire to see freedoms limited.

          1. wilderness profile image89
            wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Are you sure that throwing out phrases like "reproductive freedom" is the wise thing to do?  It does not, after all, have anything at all to do with the morality or "rightness" of murdering helpless children.

            If you're going to debate abortion, I just can't see such platitudes doing anything to convince the pro-lifers of anything at all.  Except, maybe, that you find such murder acceptable in your mind.

          2. abwilliams profile image69
            abwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Isn't that the plan Faye, to become one with Mexico and one with the world; no more borders, no more sovereign Nation, no more United States of America?

            Somehow with you and your way of talking about this particular subject, abortion, I picture babies being thrown into volcanoes or over cliffs in order to satisfy the thirst {or appetite} of the Freedom Gods.

  5. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 2 years ago

    My bank teller, a guy in his mid twenties is helping his girlfriend take care of their baby. I assumed they were married as he chatted about the struggles of being a new parent. However, I eventually learned that, no, he is not getting along with the mother very well and he may have to leave her. sad

    My dog groomer, 26 yrs, very pregnant, chatted with me about her situation. She told me this would be baby 2 and that her mother takes care of child 1, (a two year old) while she works. She told me she has cut off the boyfriend from sex. She explained she did not believe in abortion. Then she said, "He wants to marry me, but I don't think he is mature enough. He partys too much."

    I said, "He might change once he has committed himself to you and the children!"

    "I cannot trust him to change," she said flatly.

    I insisted, "You will need his help! You should agree to marry him and give him a chance since he is willing!"

    She said, "He better help me!"

    But if she has cut him off from the love potion, he may drift away from her and the children.

    - very sad, if you ask me.

    We could all go on and on with similar modern day anecdotes, I am sure.

  6. abwilliams profile image69
    abwilliamsposted 2 years ago

    I expressed what "I believe", call it proselytizing if you wish.  I don't know much about the Falwells, but following people....is never a good practice, people are imperfect and will, inevitably, let you down.

    1. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I never said anything about your proselytizing, I only defined what it was.

      I support that anyone can believe what they want, just don't have their beliefs be forced on others.

      Only fools follow people blindly without questioning where they are leading them to. Your acknowledgement of the inherent imperfection of people and the danger of relying on them is agreed to and quite clear.

  7. Fayetteville Faye profile image60
    Fayetteville Fayeposted 2 years ago

    They aren't even trying to hide it anymore. Misogyny on full display.

    Minnesota Republican candidate for lieutenant governor Matt Birk is standing behind comments he made about women and abortion.

    The former Minnesota Vikings center made the comments at the National Right to Life conference in Georgia last month, saying American culture promotes abortion partially by telling women "they should have careers."

    https://youtu.be/B1QqpuolxQ8

    1. wilderness profile image89
      wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      "They aren't even trying to hide it anymore."

      Who are "they"?  One idiot making a stupid statement?

      1. gmwilliams profile image83
        gmwilliamsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        You KNOW who THEY are.  C'mon now, man.

        1. wilderness profile image89
          wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          I know of no one that would make such a stupid statement.  Do you?

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)