Demeanor Detour -- Harris in the Hot Seat!
Demeanor refers to the outward behavior or manner of an individual, often reflecting their attitude and emotional state. Character, on the other hand, encompasses the set of moral and ethical qualities that define a person. With these definitions in mind, I invite everyone to share their unvarnished views on Kamala Harris's demeanor and what it might indicate about her character. This is a chance for open discussion, and I assure you that no opinion is set in stone—feel free to share your thoughts candidly.
To set the stage, think of Eminem's words in 8 Mile, where he lays everything bare about himself to clear the air in his rap off. We all have a well-documented understanding of Donald Trump, so let's shift our focus to dissect Harris's demeanor. What do you see when you observe her? How does her behavior influence your perception of her character? Let's engage in this exploration together!I am really starting to become suspicious. Harris is such a ditz that I think we are "supposed" to vote for Trump.
Perhaps we are being prodded to elect Trump this time by whoever "THEY" is. Maybe they have plans for using or derailing Trump once he is in office. I don't trust anybody any more. I will still vote for Trump because the illusion that he is the good guy is still intact. Not to mention the illusion that we will have a fair election is still intact. Why, I don't know.
I watch so many people speaking on their platforms on YouTube pointing out what a fake, phony goofball she is. In my mind, she intent on pleasing everyone but her own soul. Yet she probably pleases absolutely no one. Not even her team.
Most realize she will do as she is told by Team Soros.
Furthermore who would marry such a man as Imhoff? He seems like a man who will do exactly as he is told by his wife. Well, there you have it. Most/Real woman want a strong capable man.
So how is that for UNVARNISHED?First thank you Kathryn for your comment ---
" In my mind, she's intent on pleasing everyone but her own soul. Yet she probably pleases absolutely no one."
Wow, what a deeply insightful and prophetic sentiment!
This really does say it all in a few words... Your statement hits hard, and feels so powerful!" I will be borrowing it.
Hi Shar, each time I see Kamala or hear her speak, she comes off as rehearsed, pretending to be someone else, trying out for a part... None of it is real, it's all make-believe.
It's, as if, she is attempting to impress a Parent, a Teacher, a Professor, a former boss... someone that she failed to impress at some point in her life, and it gnaws at her. Perhaps she has been pretending for so long, she lost the real Kamala somewhere along the way!?
As she is or appears to be, she doesn't come off as credible or capable. She isn't even likeable, and I believe that she is in way in over her head!Hi Angie, I completely agree with you. Every time I hear Kamala Harris speak, it feels like she's putting on a performance rather than being authentic. There’s something about her demeanor that suggests she’s trying too hard to impress, almost as if she’s still seeking validation from someone. This lack of authenticity makes it hard to view her as credible or relatable, and it definitely gives the impression that she’s not quite up to the challenges that the presidency would demand.
Her demeanor? In general, confident, assertive, and engaging. She seems approachable and relatable . I think she displays a warm and personable style, not overly combative. She appears kind and it feels like she has awareness of the experiences of others, simply because her background and upbringing have given her that ability.
How much does demeanor relate to character? I'm not so sure about that one. Demeanor seems fluid while character more fixed.Human beings have an amazing ability to imagine things and that is a really amazing feature of our species. Did I mention that I really love this country and that we all, all of us, do love this country?
We are not only imaginative, but ambitious and all that great stuff about our amazing species. And by species, I mean humans and by humans I mean We the Humans of the United States of America. We also care very much about other beings of our species in the rest of the world. Of course, we cannot ignore our fellow humans in other countries because that wouldn't be very amazing ... at all! You know?
So look, I was raised middle class by a female who couldn't buy a house 'till I was in High School! I have a lot of compassion for all the females in this beautiful nation who are paying so much in grocery stores and at the gas pumps. (Well, females all across the land have explained this to me. I really have no first hand experience, since I have quite a bit of money. Ha ha ha.) Nevertheless, as a female, I bring a lot of understanding and compassion to the females of our wonderful and special human species. Did you know that both males and females are descended from ...
oh, you know, the thing.
Oh wait, I morphed into Kamala and then Joe.
Yikes, I gotta step away from all these screens.Kathryn, your funny analogy is intriguing and touches on the idea that one's demeanor can reveal character—it just seeps through naturally. Take your example, for instance: many have noticed that Kamala often repeats the same stories about her middle-class upbringing. Her demeanor feels rehearsed, with little variation in her words, and her expressions seem intended to project joy when discussing her childhood. Yet, her face often stiffens, and her eyes sometimes give a "deer in the headlights" look. What might this suggest about her character?
The repetition of the same stories, coupled with rehearsed expressions, might indicate a desire to control how she is perceived, which is common in public figures who are conscious of maintaining a specific image.
Her stiffened facial expressions and "deer in the headlights" look could be signs of underlying stress or discomfort with the narrative she is sharing. Psychologically, this might indicate a disconnection between what she is saying and how she feels internally. For example, if she’s repeatedly talking about her past but doesn’t fully connect with the emotions tied to it, her body language might reflect that dissonance.
Another possibility is that this demeanor reflects someone who is overly rehearsed to the point of lacking authenticity in delivery. In psychology, this might be seen as a form of impression management, where a person overcompensates in trying to appear genuine, which can have the opposite effect by coming across as forced or insincere."... where a person overcompensates in trying to appear genuine, which can have the opposite effect by coming across as forced or insincere."
This manner of "seeming" is SO irritating to others!
Very insightful. Thanks!I feel she does overcompensate, It is irritating. She has the endless stiff smile, and hands waving about... Very annoying. I realize the hand bit is a fad at this point, but it seems so phony. I equate it to the fad when many used the word "right" after every sentence they spoke or YaY!
Could that be why she had such low approval ratings before she tossed her hat in the ring, and many labeled her "unlikeable?Interjecting not about Harris demeanor, but about hand waving. I reported directly to the President and Vice President of the Corporation I worked. The Vice President, she always waved her hands about when talking if standing up and a little when sitting. Many times I found it to be intimidating or somewhat threatening. It was distracting and at times hindered clear communication because I was focused on her hands and not listening to her.
I dont know what type of hand waving are you guys talking about. Buuut, you would have a hard time being around Puerto Ricans. We speak with our hands. LOL
Oops! Though I was being critical, a factor is she only stood speaking while using her hands/arms when it was something important to her otherwise she sat at her desk with maybe opening and closing her hands in and out. There is a stereo type that Italians speak with their hands.
Top 20 essential Italian hand gestures for Italian language learners by Languages Alive
https://www.languagesalive.com/italian-hand-gestures/
"Among many other sayings and idiomatic expressions that are commonly used in everyday speech, there is one that Italian native speakers particularly cherish, which is “talking” with their hands. This also says so much about Italian cultural behaviour and communication habits as well as what it really means to be Italian. As Italians say: un gesto vale più di mille parole – meaning ‘a gesture is more valuable than a thousand words’. So let’s discover the most popular ones!"
Oops! Sharlee, I wasn't trying to hijack the thread.Oh, yes, they do! (Italians)
I thought we use our hands a lot until I took Italian classes at the university.
You have not hijacked -- Outward demeanor refers to a person's outward behavior, including how they act, speak, and express themselves. You added interesting facts regarding outward demeanor.
I perhaps should not have brought up the hand gesturing. However, my thread is all about "Demeanor ", hence the title, as well as my closing questions --- What do you see when you observe her? How does her behavior influence your perception of her character? I asked for "unvarnished" views. So all could feel comfortable sharing their view.
My response to Kathryn shared my view. I find Harris's hand gesture more fad-like. I came by this view actually by noting some of my very own friends have picked up on this fad. Women that never had the habit, now are waving their hands all over the place. Please keep in mind, that I realize many people throughout their lives very naturally, and innately use their hands to express themselves.Frankly, the one opportunity to see Harris was the debate that I didn't watch. My bust. It came on during my normal day-to-day sleeping hours here in California - 6 PM. I wouldn't have seen it at 9 pm either. I am a night owl.
I have seen her with short news clips on local news such as getting on a plane or standing at podium. Not enough to form a view or opinion. So, I am relying on this thread unless I search out YouTube's.I have not added links in order not to sway anyone's personal view. I kept it short and sweet, and hopefully, I showed no bias. I hoped to glean personal views, which I feel I am seeing. I think if I added a video, it would have shown bias. I have shared my views by responding to other's comments, in hopes of furthering more discussion.
A bit off the track --- How are you researching Harris, without watching her live? She has had several rallies and a few one-on-one interviews. I assumed as an independent you are digging into both candidates."A bit off the track --- How are you researching Harris, without watching her live?"
Frankly, I haven't begun digging deep into her, yet. I should get going on it, while I will be focusing on the issues shall we say close to my heart first. My main source of the asides of what to look into is this forum topic. I have done 'some' research spawned by dialogue here.
As said, elsewhere at one time, I have changed my view with looking on how to vote. At this time my default vote is Teddy Roosevelt unless something rises above the fray in the following scenario.
Trump = No
Republican Party = undecided
Harris is an undecided
Democratic Party is a No by a narrow margin. I don't like the influence of the extreme progressives.
Yet, most certainly, the synergy between candidate and party is to be considered.Thanks for sharing. I will share mine, and please take as meant to be constructive.
I see voting as crucial because it allows you to actively influence the direction of if not leadership at best policies. When you vote for a candidate with a clear agenda, you're supporting specific goals that can shape the future of the Nation. Simply writing in a name without taking into consideration your voice counts may not contribute to meaningful change or effective governance. I can see the fact you would be voting in a state that ultimately any other vote but Harris, really won't count. But, "what if"...
Voting thoughtfully ensures your voice helps create the change you may want to see.Thanks for sharing your perspective!
As far as I am concerned every intentional vote no matter who it is for - main parties, 3rd parties, or write-in, counts. For 'me' voting is an obligation though some say it is a privilege or right both being an option to vote or not. If I don't officially vote with intention, then I am not participating in democracy, though if I don't vote it is a product of free will and choice.
Ken, GA, and I had an exchange on if my California vote counts. I discovered an article when I questioned Ken saying it didn't. It is . . .
In a democracy, does every vote count? by Costas Panayotakis, Professor of Sociology, New York City College of Technology (City University of New York) published on The Loop / ECPR Political Science Blog,
https://theloop.ecpr.eu/in-a-democracy- … ote-count/
It looked at the thesis; Every Vote Counts (EVC)
It ends with Democracy: idealism and solidarity rather than self-interest
" . . . analyses the popular claim that 'every vote counts' in a democracy. He finds it is based on false assumptions and a misunderstanding of statistical probability. Voting and democratic participation, he concludes, are not based on individualistic self-interest but on some degree of idealism and solidarity."
[Edit: While filling up the coffee cup arrives a passing thought. Does an incorrect vote as in the chosen candidate lost the election have the same weight of value as the vote not cast?]" If I don't officially vote with intention, then I am not participating in democracy, though if I don't vote it is a product of free will and choice."
Your logic seems to present a false dichotomy between voting with intention and exercising free will. While it's true that not voting can be seen as a choice, participating in the democratic process by casting your vote is not just about individual will; it's about engaging with the collective voice of the community. By abstaining from voting, you might inadvertently allow others to make decisions that affect your life and society without your input. Democracy thrives on participation, and every vote contributes to shaping the policies and leadership that impact everyone. Wouldn’t it make more sense to participate actively, even if your intention isn’t explicitly defined, rather than stepping back entirely and letting others decide for you?Fortunately, there is a trend that is becoming more common:
https://x.com/brianeskow/status/1838909155954008138
That is becoming the norm of what I have been seeing... from regular folks on the street being asked by YouTubers to posts on X.
I believe Trump could win most States not on the West Coast or NY-New England area. Virginia, North Carolina, PA, OH, FL, TX, GA, etc.
If... lots of Ifs...
Still... we have a chance with a Harris Presidency to bring about a Mad Max world into reality... I am beginning to warm to that idea, the kill or be killed aspect of it appeals to my Ranger side, and as 60 is creeping up on me, what better way to go out than with an America that is as chaotic and dangerous as anything you could find in places like Libya or Syria today?Yes, humans go in either positive or negative directions. They don't stand still. The momentum offers a thrill in either direction, perhaps.
Ken, I understand your disappointment, but here's how I see it. If she wins, we might face something even worse than what we experienced under Biden. I still have faith that those who thought voting her in was a good idea will eventually realize where she’s leading the country. Liberals often talk a passionate game, but when times get tough, they fold. When the problems brought by migration hit their own neighborhoods, and they see she’s not solving wars but maybe creating more, they’ll start to back away. She might get four years—maybe even face impeachment. Sometimes, it just takes a little longer for liberals to see what’s right in front of them, and then, they’ll be reaching for the Kleenex.
Hey, Mexico isn’t a bad place to settle… just sit back, relax, and let others handle their political issues. Nations rise and fall, and we had a good run. But honestly, I think our problems are becoming almost insurmountable and continue to grow. We’ve overspent, we haven’t educated our youth as well as we should have, we’ve been too focused on joining a global community instead of tending to our own, and we've also visibly lost the values we once took pride in.
I've noticed a lot of people changing their votes lately. Some individuals I've debated with for years have come to realize that Harris is... well, I won't say it outright, but many have used some pretty unflattering labels for her. Hopefully, Trump pulls it off.Its not "we might" its definitely a "we will"....
But I have been running this through the back of my mind for a couple hours now...
I mean honestly, truly, life has become mind-numbingly boring to me lately, since leaving the Army I have done all the "real life" stuff, the family, kids, business, stocks... I see a rocket launched every other day at work for cripes sakes, but its tediously boring of late.
So many places in the world where you can't take for granted walking down the street without someone trying to kill you.
America doesn't have that quite yet, sure its starting to become the norm in parts of CA, parts of Chicago... but we so take for granted going to the grocery store, or taking a stroll in the park, without concern.
Would it really be so bad to be living in a war-torn semi-nationless world where death could be around any corner, for any reason?
It really spices up life, makes you appreciate the moment more, and when things do start exploding and the bullets are flying, you'll never feel more alive.
Continuing down the Biden-Harris path could be fun.
Yup, all that and the Biden-Harris cabal have put all the chips on the table on their gamble to take down Russia.
The strategy for America remaining a dominant force and being able to keep the now 36 trillion dollar debt from destroying the economy and cause even the richest of institutions of the West great suffering literally hangs on Russia's defeat and the ability of the West to essentially break down Russia into smaller Banana Republic states that can be exploited.
It didn't have to be this way... this was a bad plan dreamt up decades ago, it was a different world... China was NOT the powerhouse threat it is today when they concocted these greedy-hegemonic plans.
What Biden-Harris efforts have done is push Russia into China's arms and away from Europe, as well as unite Russia with Saudi Arabia and the UAE like never before.
I can't express the ways they have harmed our relations with the rest of the world over the course of the last 4 years... they have literally split it into two camps... and IMO, the other camp appears to be holding a better hand than our own.I voted Democrat until Obama. I voted for Obumbler. What a disaster, he had done nothing for America. He implemented Obamacare & become a dictator stating that penalties will be applied if one doesn't choose healthcare. I have had enough. The Democrats have progressed toward authoritarianism. In 2016, there was a choice between Hillary & Trump-I elected Trump. I will, for now, never vote Democrat.
Grace, I also voted for Obama in his first term, but, like you, I saw the writing on the wall about where he was taking us. It became clear that the policies he was implementing, especially with Obamacare, were leading us down a path toward bigger government involvement and control. That was a major turning point for me, and it’s only become more evident since then.
The Democrats today are pushing us even faster toward socialism. The party’s policies seem increasingly focused on wealth redistribution, government control of healthcare, and limiting personal freedoms in favor of what they consider the greater good. This direction concerns me because it undermines the values of individual responsibility and free enterprise that have made America strong. The shift toward centralizing power and expanding government influence, in my view, puts us on a slippery slope that could fundamentally change the nature of our country., and quickly.
So, I completely understand why you feel the way you do, and I share your concerns. I, too, have had enough of where the Democrats are trying to take us.Almost 50 million people have chosen plans under the affordable Care act since 2014. Can you address the economic impacts resulting if the plan was never enacted. ?
Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney support Harris.
In addition, a group of more than 200 who worked for former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, as well as the late Sen. John McCain signed onto a letter supporting Harris.
So there you go, the people you already know who love War and love giving trillions away to Military Contractors and the MIC at large support Harris.
As I always say, there is no real difference between the corrupt Democrats fleecing America and the corrupt Republicans, they work together on behalf of the most powerful and evil of interests behind the scenes.
Harris is just the latest face they are throwing on the package of SOS that they are selling Americans.
Trump is the only alternative and only solution available to us to avoid a global war and a borderless world... in which being an American citizen will only bring you the benefit of paying more in taxes than those who live in America that are not citizens, but receive the same, or better, benefits than do our Veterans and those most in need.Thanks
I have this canned political reply I use on X to fits the characters allowed:
Do you believe in
-NO Borders?
-Transmen should be protected as a minority and allowed to compete against women?
-spending hundreds of billions funding wars and helping kill hundreds of thousands of people and escalating toward nuclear war?
-inflation?
If yes Vote Harris.
~whatcha think?
In my view, you can often catch a glimpse of someone's character through their demeanor by observing how they consistently respond to various situations. For example, a person's reaction to stress can reveal much about their inner strength or emotional stability. If they remain calm and composed under pressure, it may suggest they have self-control and resilience. On the other hand, a demeanor marked by empathy and kindness toward others, especially those who can't offer anything in return, can be a strong indication of a compassionate and considerate nature. Similarly, honesty and integrity often show through demeanor as well. People with strong character tend to communicate directly, maintain eye contact, and avoid evasiveness, signaling comfort with the truth. Facial expressions can show character breaking through.
Another example is how a person handles both praise and criticism can reveal either humility or arrogance. A modest reaction to compliments and a constructive response to criticism may suggest self-awareness and a balanced ego. Finally, consistency is key. If a person’s demeanor remains steady across various contexts—whether with friends or strangers, in personal or professional settings—it often indicates genuineness and authenticity. In contrast, inconsistent behavior, where someone is kind in one situation but dismissive or rude in another, may suggest a lack of sincerity.
If approachable, why does she stay away in press conferences? Is she truly relatable? She often seems uneasy in open-style interviews, like the one she did with Oprah Winfrey. I mean, how could anyone be uncomfortable with Oprah? But she did appear uncomfortable much of the time. So did Oprah.
Reviews of Kamala Harris's interview with Oprah Winfrey were mixed. Some praised her for being emotional and relatable on topics like reproductive rights and gun violence. However, there were criticisms as well, particularly regarding her tendency to repeat herself, which made parts of the interview feel rehearsed and unfocused.
It seems as if Americans reserve this type of dissection solely for female seeking leadership.
The undermining of women in politics is certainly not new. Stereotypes and double standards continue to exist for female politicians.
And it starts with things as basic and as simple as being scrutinized for their physical appearance, what they wear, how their hair looks, the way in which they speak.
During the 2016 presidential election, we heard comments that Hillary Clinton didn't smile enough (among many other personal characteristic criticisms). We never heard that about Bernie Sanders, and heaven knows he is not somebody who grins. He's pretty grumpy, and so is, for that matter, Trump.
Women are also criticized for being shrill when they speak forcefully. Media focus on details not related to the issues can hurt women electorally. The smile, the laugh, the hand gestures, every move of the muscle on their face has some deeper meaning.
If the media is not focusing on the content of what women are talking about, but much more on their presentation, their style, their appearance, it diminishes them as serious candidates.
And this becomes even more of a challenge for women who are running for office, because women are not assumed, in the same way that men are assumed to be, qualified and capable and able to hold these offices. So, they have to prove themselves in ways that male candidates do not.While it’s true that women in politics have historically faced intense scrutiny regarding their appearance and presentation, this kind of dissection may not hold as much weight in today’s political climate. Increasingly, voters are prioritizing qualifications, policies, and leadership capabilities over superficial assessments. Many Americans now recognize that the best person for the job—regardless of gender—should be chosen based on their ability to effectively address the issues at hand.
Moreover, as more women enter leadership roles and as society progresses, the expectation that they must constantly prove their competence is gradually diminishing. The challenge remains, but the emphasis on merit and ability is becoming the prevailing sentiment, suggesting that the scrutiny women face is no longer as applicable as it once was.
In my view, the general public critiques male candidates as well, including their demeanor and appearance, and they can be just as critical. One can't really hide their demeanor easily, and it often plays a significant role in how candidates are perceived. Whether it's a lack of charisma, body language, or even the way they dress, these factors contribute to public opinion and can influence a candidate's chances.I might have to call BS on this one...
Men don't have a problem following or believing in COMPETENT and CAPABLE women.
Take Tulsi Gabbard for example... successful politician, successful soldier, she has a LOT of support from men many on the Left call sexist and racist.
How is that?
We can go way back to the likes of Margaret Thatcher or Condoleezza Rice as prominent women in politics, despite being years, decades ago whom I know were respected across the board.
They were intelligent, competent, capable leaders.
The problem is the Left doesn't like qualifiers being applied... words like Capable or Competent are racist code words... and certainly the word Intelligent is fraught with sexist underpinnings.I agree with you. Women have come a long way and achieved great strides. However, there are still some who fall back on the notion that they can’t succeed in a man’s world simply because they are women. This mindset still exists. But then we have women like Margaret Thatcher, Condoleezza Rice, and Tulsi Gabbard who don’t subscribe to the "I’m being discriminated against" narrative.
We’ve always had standout women, and we’ve always had those who lean on the belief that they’re being stereotyped because of their gender. I believe this is less prevalent today. Isn't it easier to play the victim than to demand the respect you truly deserve?
When it comes to Harris, I don’t respect anyone who can’t speak up and share their own thoughts. I don’t respect any candidate who won’t step up and take a press conference—that’s a huge red flag. In my opinion, this kind of behavior undermines all the progress strong women have made. I want the first woman president to be someone who makes me proud, not someone who leaves me feeling disappointed."Isn't it easier to play the victim than to demand the respect you truly deserve?"
Not being argumentative, but the very first thought I had reading that, while ignoring the context of women as a stereotype, is the ingrained perhaps innate theme of survival of the fittest. Do people either generally or specifically choose between those two sentiments - playing victim contrast demanding respect, guided by gaining the most out of a situation or circumstance. I suspect it could even be viewed as capitalism at work where a return to the greatest return of investment (effort) is sought.
Notate . . . Yup, I am weird while I have a wandering mind at times . . .
I wholeheartedly disagree. I was so excited when John McCain slected Sarah Palin as his running mate. He was a real yawner and she brought new and refreshing life to the ticket. However, the media treated her much as they've treated Trump.... disrespectfully!
I love Tulsi Gabbard, l cheered when she stood up to Kamala Harris & to her own [former] Party! She is a take charge type of woman and a born leader. Kari Lake has all the qualities of a great leader, she is as sharp and as knowledgeable as they come.
Give me "CONSERVATIVE" women, get my vote -- after 2024. This year is reserved for Donald Trump. It is only fair since he was robbed in 2020!
I've tried to listen to harris and understand her position on the issues.
What has stunned me is that she is unable to articulate her position on any issue clearly. I'm not alone in being surprised by her word salads. Not a straight answer to anything. She is asked a serious question and gives this emotional diatribe and seems to forget what she was asked. I can't stand her being asked a question on the economy and saying, "I was born in a middle-class family....."
Her swirling platitudes and nervous laugh make her appear unintelligent.
The other thing I think speaks volumes about her are her flip flops on major issues. She was for mandatory gun buy-backs, now she's against them. She was for an open border and now she is for the border wall. She was against fracking and now she is for fracking. She was for the green new deal and now her campaign says she no longer supports it.
She needs to explain WHY she has changed her position on so many issues. I believe it is like Bernie Sanders said, she is pragmatic and doing what is necessary to win. She believes nothing of what she says.
All this tells me she stands for nothing and has no heart-felt beliefs or values. I watch her and I think of someone from a fraternity who is just getting by on their ability to make things up as they go.
Leaders lead by example, I shudder to think the example she is providing. It is one I hope nobody follows.Well how do you feel about being put in jail because you express disagreement with a judge?
'The former president, who has invoked his First Amendment right to launch a bevy of attacks against federal and state judges, suggested it should be “illegal” to rebuke judicial decisions or try and advocate in favor of a certain decision.
“It should be illegal, what happens,” Trump told a crowd in Pennslyvania. “You know, you have these guys like playing the ref, like the great Bobby Knight. These people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges and our justices, trying to get them to sway their vote, sway their decision.”
Sounds legit? I honestly don't know why more people aren't talking about this deeply disturbing statement
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl … 18050.html"Sounds legit?"
Nope, that is President Donald Trump being entertaining and using hyperbolae to illustrate a point.Yes, I've put it in the pros and cons of the candidates thread. I definitely think it's a con.
In the quote from Trump, he expresses frustration with individuals who criticize or attempt to influence the decisions of judges and justices, particularly in the context of political or legal pressure. By comparing it to "playing the ref," he's referring to the idea of people unfairly trying to sway a judge's decision in the same way a coach might pressure a referee in a sports game. Trump suggests that such actions should be illegal, emphasizing that judges should be free from public criticism and attempts to influence their rulings.
However, there is a noticeable contrast between this statement and Trump's own behavior in his court cases. He has frequently invoked the First Amendment to defend his right to criticize judges, prosecutors, and the legal system as part of his broader political speech. This includes making public statements about the judges presiding over his cases, often labeling them as biased or politically motivated.
The difference in these actions likely stems from Trump's view that his own criticisms are part of a broader fight against what he considers unjust treatment, while he sees others' criticisms of the judiciary as an attempt to corrupt or manipulate the system. He might not view his own critiques as trying to sway decisions in the same way, instead framing them as exposing perceived biases or defending himself.
Ultimately, this contradiction highlights the tension between the principle of free speech and the desire to protect the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system.Will trump jail people for speaking out against judges? If anything, Trump is a very simple, blunt, straightforward man. He says exactly what he means.
That would take a law, and I doubt Congress would even entertain it. It is very well possible he shared his truth. He is straightforward, and I see he has shared he wants the death penalty for drug dealers.
What does that say about his thoughts or values on free speech though? A candidate expressing his desire to jail people who express their right to freedom of speech is really extreme.
"These people should be put in jail the way they talk".
Threatening to jail citizens because of their speech, is something that would certainly cause me to withdrawal support from a candidate.
Although I do see quite a bit of support from MAGA for this rhetoric online in various social media platforms. For me, MAGA has given up the ability to talk about Free speech at this point. Trump is obviously not a proponent of free speech if he wants to jail people.
I am thankful though that he seems to have no filter from his thoughts to his speech.
She struggles to articulate her thoughts, and it seems like she’s not even sharing her ideas during her appearances. She’s a far-leftist parroting what she’s been told to say. She can’t handle unscripted situations—just watch her fumble in the Oprah interview. When asked a direct question, she immediately shifts into a rehearsed speech, even if it’s off-topic. It looks like she’s been coached to fall back on talking points about her middle-class upbringing whenever she’s in a tough spot. Her demeanor, I agree, makes her come across as less intelligent than she might actually be. And as for her flip-flopping—if she were honest about her views, it’d be clear she’s a true Marxist. Watching her live feels like listening to nails on a chalkboard.
This is the number one Con on my pros and cons list. It is the most glaring hard to hide from fact. Number two --- her very far-left ideologies. I mean she her ideas shock the hell out of me.
If you could name one idea that shocks you the most, what would that be?
I don't think this discussion was meant to showcase TDS. Perhaps you should start your own separate discussion!?
No...we have enough TDS discussions... ESO has created plenty enough for the whole country, let alone HubPages.
I suppose we could turn this into how your Democrat-led-government in conjunction with the FBI and collaborating MSM find new ways to deceive the American people.
We need a few more threads exposing the depths of corruption running rampant in our government today, as America gets nearer to its Mad Max era.
Hmmm... take this for example, notice how the changes were made in 2021:
4 Reasons We Should Worry About Missing Crime Data
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023 … -gap-nibrs
Or this:
New Data Reveal Biden Administration’s Failure to Remove Over 99% of Released Illegal Aliens, Fueling Border Crisis Concerns
https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press … ed-illegal
THE BIDEN BORDER CRISIS: NEW DATA AND TESTIMONY SHOW
HOW THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION OPENED THE SOUTHWEST
BORDER AND ABANDONED INTERIOR ENFORCEMENT
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-s … timony.pdfOuch, tell it. There are those who worship Biden no matter how deleterious he was. Such people are called zealots. Zealots can't be reasoned. Zealots go by visceral emotion, not logic.
Candace Owens dug into Kamala's grandmother shown in her book The Truths We Hold. Turns out her Jamaican grandmother, Beryl Finegan (married to a Lawford Newland of which there are zero records), died in 1960, four years before Kamala was born, so the photo of her as an adult standing next to her alleged grandmother, Beryl, is not a Truth she Holds. It may have been her great grandmother, Iris Finegan, as that woman looks identical to another photo of Iris holding Kamala on her lap as a baby. The woman LIES, blatantly LIES. Lies do not reflect anything good about a person's character.
Sure doesn't but the followers don't care. It is Kamala uber alles for them.
BREAKING NEWS!!!: Kamala Safe And In Stable Condition After Attempted Interview
https://babylonbee.com/news/kamala-safe … -interview
Related Discussions
- 626
The Harris Trump Debate. Who do you think won.
by Mike Russo 2 months ago
I believe Kamala pushed everyone of Trump's buttons in the debate. She was in her former prosecutor mode. She was calm and looked at Trump many times. He never looked at her once. She acted as if she was in a court room and talking to the jury about Trump. She had him on the...
- 482
The 2024 Presidential Election
by Scott Belford 4 weeks ago
I am sure many are going to disagree, but I predict Vice President Kamala Harris will win - by a lot!That is a feeling, not backed up by polling. The polling leans toward he winning - by a little as well as flipping the House and a slim chance of keeping the Senate.
- 44
Women Hiding Votes: A Critique of Kamala Harris's Latest Ad
by Sharlee 5 weeks ago
I just saw a Harris ad that starts with what looks like a working-class guy, then cuts to some women chatting about going against what their husbands told them to vote for. I had to take a break after that one—it seriously made me feel nauseous! But it got me thinking: hey ladies, sounds like you...
- 44
Harris/Walz first interview. Did it hurt or help their campaign?
by Readmikenow 3 months ago
Did anyone see the CNN interview of harris/walz?What was walz doing there in the first place? She is the one running for president and this is her FIRST interview since designated as the democrat nominee for president. He has been referred to as her emotional-support white guy.I thought...
- 35
Republican mayor supports Kamala Harris
by IslandBites 6 weeks ago
Why, as a Republican mayor, I support Kamala Harris over TrumpThe time has come for my fellow Arizona Republicans to return to the core foundations of the Grand Old Party.Our party used to stand for the belief that every Arizonan, no matter their background or circumstances, should have the...
- 46
Why does Kamala Harris avoid the press?
by Readmikenow 3 months ago
Both Donald Trump and JD Vance have held press conferences and spent time answering questions from reporters. Kamala Harris has done none of it. Why is she hiding from the press? Why is she and Walz afraid of holding a press conference. They seem great giving speeches off...