Americans are happy - media concealing it to 'slow support' for Trump

Jump to Last Post 51-87 of 87 discussions (381 posts)
  1. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    Happy folks in deep red Nebraska...

    https://x.com/Newsweek/status/1902325428624486601

  2. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    I guess points for continuing to get out in front of extremely unhappy constituents??.  She was so condescending and dismissive in her responses...in true maga style...gross.  this bunch is completely tone deaf and will pay shortly at the ballot box.

    https://x.com/DemocraticWins/status/1902531622655717802

    1. Readmikenow profile image83
      Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

      Interesting how President Donald Trump's approval rating remains at an all-time high and democrats is at an all-time low.

      I think it may be democrats who are tone deaf.

      democrats need to hope things change between now and the mid-terms.  If it was held today, they'd get destroyed at the ballot box.

      1. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        His approval rating is not at an all-time high against other presidents at the same point in their term. Current numbers are only beating his previous numbers... Which  were absolutely dismal.

        1. Readmikenow profile image83
          Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

          I hope democrats don't change.

          I hope they continue traveling down the path they are on right now.

          1. Willowarbor profile image60
            Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

            Biden lost on an economy that was the best in the world because Americans just weren't "feeling it" how do you think they're feeling it now that their  retirement accounts have been drained? And the economy is in worse shape? Not to mention the fact that Trump is marching us into a dictatorship every day with some new constitutional crisis... Today he is attempting to shut the Department of Education... Unbelievably stupid

            1. Readmikenow profile image83
              Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

              Here is your problem.

              Biden didn't lose, he was removed from the election process by the democrat party.

              The reason he was removed was because biden had significant cognitive issues. 

              President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise of shutting down the Department of Education.  He is fulfilling a campaign promise he made to the millions of American who voted for him.

              1. Miebakagh57 profile image84
                Miebakagh57posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                Fulfiling a campaign promise is good. But the negatives out-weights the positives on that specific issue of cost saving, right?

      2. Credence2 profile image81
        Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

        When more people "pull their heads out", they will realize that Trump has had it in for them as well.

        Democratic Party stock will rise as a result.

        2026 Midterms are coming, I will just have to wait for it...

      3. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

        I follow polls closely--- the Polls are really good regarding Trump, and the Democrats don't even have O2 any longer.

  3. abwilliams profile image78
    abwilliamsposted 4 months ago

    Hey Mike, the Silent Majority
    just posted this on FB, and I tend to agree with them:

    https://hubstatic.com/17424411_f1024.jpg

    1. Willowarbor profile image60
      Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

      Do we really need to show the video again of your folks beating police officers with flagpoles? Smearing their own crap around? Crushing a police officer in  a doorway?

      1. abwilliams profile image78
        abwilliamsposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        Look again, a little closer, SO much more is finally coming out about that day! But again, I get it, you have to explain away molotov cocktails almost on a daily basis!

        1. Willowarbor profile image60
          Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

          Doesn't change the fact that they did what they did... This still happened.

          https://hubstatic.com/17424450_f1024.jpg

          1. Readmikenow profile image83
            Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

            Need we provide some videos and pictures from the George Floyd riots?

            Riots where police were actually killed by liberal mobs.

            1. Willowarbor profile image60
              Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

              Are you really trying to make a genuine argument that all people were "bad" who took part in George Floyd protests and all people were angelic who took part in j6 riots??

              The black and white thinking really is a hallmark of maga isn't it.

              1. abwilliams profile image78
                abwilliamsposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                We cannot make that argument because the same "bad people" participated in both, and there's  definitely nothing "angelic" about them.

              2. Readmikenow profile image83
                Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                The George Floyd protests was 1,000 times worse than what happed on J6.

                Billions of dollars in damage.  Parts of cities taken over.  Police officers killed.  A future VP of the United States working to get the hundreds of criminals bail.

                Nothing like that happed on J6.

      2. Readmikenow profile image83
        Readmikenowposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        I don't think anything like that happened because of a boycott of Bud Light.

  4. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    https://hubstatic.com/17425893.jpg

    Bernie and AOC yesterday in Arizona.. I cannot remember any such resistance movement this large, this soon after an election . 15,000 in Arizona... 20,000 in Colorado.  People don't get off their couch so easily.

  5. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    "Today more people in Vegas came out to see Bernie and AOC than they did to see Trump just 54 days ago.  #fighttheoligarchy"

    https://hubstatic.com/17425901_f1024.jpg

    Meanwhile at your local Republican Town Hall...

    https://x.com/cwebbonline/status/1902542629541441564

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      ​In the 2024 presidential election, Donald Trump won Nevada, securing approximately 50.6% of the vote, while Vice President Kamala Harris received about 47.5%. This victory marked the FRIST time a Republican presidential candidate carried Nevada since 2004. ​

      It looks like we may have to keep an eye on vegas for 4 years down the road.To keep our win...

  6. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    Just a Republican telling it like it is... Folks are spitting mad out here


    https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/19 … 1043524639

    1. peoplepower73 profile image86
      peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      The word that is missing is "alleged." Without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, they are alleged to be gang members.  There was no transparency.  They were all deported without due process of the law. Therefore, they are alleged criminals.

      One of them was deported on the grounds that he had a gang member tattoo on his arm.  It turns out he was not a gang member, but a soccer player.  The tattoo that was on his arm was for a soccer team he admires.

      The last time I looked we are not at war with the Venezuelan Nation. Therefore, Trump's 1798 Aliens Enemy Act does not hold water. Unless the gang was sent here by Nicolás Maduro  to invade the USA.

      Trump paid 6 million tax payer dollars to El Salvador to have them deported and jailed for a year without any transparency and due process of law.

      Stephen Miller, Trump's advisor for everything is behind all of this, but that is another story.

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/roses-real-m … p_catchall

      https://apnews.com/article/alien-enemie … a9c125722f

  7. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    At Sen. Chuck Grassley’s raucous town hall in Hampton, Iowans’ anger with Trump and Musk boils over...

    The anger and frustration is real out here!

    https://x.com/IAStartingLine/status/1903107013929849013

  8. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    "After the town hall was over, a crowd chanting “Stand up to Trump!” waited outside the courthouse. Grassley egged them on a little as he exited, waving his arms in the air and giving two thumbs-up"

    WOW

    https://x.com/IAStartingLine/status/1903126199670341671

  9. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    YES BERNIE

    "Today,
    @AOC
    and I had 34,000 people come out in Denver.

    It is the largest rally that I have ever had.

    And it tells me that the American people will not allow Trump to move us into oligarchy and authoritarianism.

    We will fight back. We will win."
    https://hubstatic.com/17426869_f1024.jpg

    1. Credence2 profile image81
      Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      The Mile High City does not disappoint, let's hope that the trend can continue.

      1. Ken Burgess profile image72
        Ken Burgessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        Isn't that the Pot capital of the Nation?

        Where all the old hippies escaped to from CA... when CA became so bad because of the 'Progressive policies' that they had to move to a safer and more affordable State?

        On an aside, coming up on my first exploratory trip to Central Mexico, need to find a suitable place to live for when the Pendulum swings the other way, when what we consider civil society in America breaks down completely... especially being of the 55+ community, I am really not interested in making my way through any 'war zone' like turmoil.

        1. Credence2 profile image81
          Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

          Hello, Ken, Denver is where I lived and grew up so excuse me if I am rather partial about it.

          Yes, Colorado was the first state to legalize Marijuana, but the novelty has worn off over time in the Denver area.

          I don't know, I never seriously thought about leaving until now. The Missus wants to return to Hawaii as it is as "blue" a state as ever. I still tell her that The Honolulu area is very expensive and we would have to live in the bush.

          I am attracted to Western Europe or even Canada, but she won't be happy with the cold. A relatively peaceful Carribean Island like St.Martin, when I vacationed there a few years ago seemed sort of nice.

          We will just have to see where the tea leaves fall.

          1. Ken Burgess profile image72
            Ken Burgessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

            I made several trips last year "up north" thru Oct, Nov, Dec...

            Between the weather (grey skies and snow for months on end), cost of living (as bad as CA) and miserable roads (traffic) any thoughts on moving North (NY - New England) are now permanently removed from consideration.

            I am sure Colorado and West of the Mississippi in general is different, but the politics and economics probably make them almost as undesirable to my interests.

            Having spent a few years of my life living overseas in non-European nations, I know there can be benefits to living outside of the US that simply cannot be met anywhere within the US...

            For instance, getting Medical procedures done at a fraction of the cost.

            Getting prescriptions that are either illegal in America, or so costly, they might as well be.

            The dollar having twice (or more) the buying power that it has here.

            And... unfortunately... the growing unrest in America makes safety and security more easily secured in a foreign country where they are catering (protecting) their foreign investors in ways we just cannot expect in America (in most places) anymore... too many States have made crime legal and police afraid to do their jobs and maintain Law and Order.

            This is of course merely preparation for the worst case scenario, that Trump's efforts fail, and that the lunatic Left regain control... we saw what they did in the last 4 years... I doubt our economy survives their return, I think the Middle Class dies a tumultuous death if they return prior to a decade of Trump/Conservative leadership cleaning house.

            1. Credence2 profile image81
              Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

              West of the Mississippi is more staunchly Red than the East of it. With the noted exceptions of Colorado, New Mexico, the Pacific West Coast, Hawaii and Minnesota, all of the West is crimson Red. Many of these Blue states are only that because while certain areas within these states are geographically smaller they are more populous as staunch Democrat strongholds. That is not really true in Hawaii, thus the attraction.

              For me, since January 20th, the "house" is becoming more dirty rather than less.

              1. Ken Burgess profile image72
                Ken Burgessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                We have always judged things differently...

                I put far more concern on the economic... a strong economy... a government spending money wisely...

                We don't have that in America today...

                I wonder... the collapse of the West... will it propel China, Russia, India into new heights of prosperity like we experienced in the 1990s after the fall of the USSR?

                Or will the world just degrade into one big mess... a chaotic mess of 'safe zones' where the elites can live in luxury and 'no go zones' where the rest of humanity fights over the scraps.

                Either way... its time for me to consider the viability of living outside the US, or at least preparing an alternative 'home' for the possibility of things going extremely poorly in the not too distant future.

                The Pandemic isn't so long ago that I don't remember just how quickly our freedoms could be snatched away... and just how easily they got away with giving away trillions of dollars of our taxpayer debt with no accountability.

                The feeling I have at the moment is that "the West" is failing, the rest of "the West" is too far gone to recover... they will succumb to the influence and will of China/BRICS... America is not going to be able to stand against the changing tides forever.

                Now is a good time to move into some part of the world that is exploding with new opportunities and new economic growth... Central Mexico is definitely one such area, a part of the world benefiting from the millions of Americans fleeing before the ship capsizes.

                EDIT - An interesting perspective:

                Democrats’ 10-Part Strategy to Stopping Trump (At Any Cost)
                https://youtu.be/D_QAGJ2XiiQ?t=71

                1. peoplepower73 profile image86
                  peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                  Your link is BS.

                  1. Ken Burgess profile image72
                    Ken Burgessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                    It is an educated opinion.

                    Here is another you may like:

                    Bill Maher vs. Don Lemon - the New Lie of DEI & Equity
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPkixVyCad0

  10. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    MEANWHILE
    Maine voters held a town hall, and
    @SenatorCollins
    was invited but was a no-show. Well, they had one without her. This gentleman asked a few questions, but she wasn’t there to answer them. I’m sure somewhere, she is quite concerned...

    How long can they hide from their constituents? Reckoning day is coming folks

    https://x.com/1zzyzyx1/status/1902551024285728879

  11. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    Oh man, the anger at the Scott Perry Town Hall... Which he hid from also.

    https://x.com/pennslinger/status/1902481023704666342

  12. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    So much accomplishment. So much success. So much of what voters voted for.  WHY ARE THESE REPS RUNNING FROM IT??

    KnoxvilleHoller
    HAPPENING NOW IN KNOXVILLE… empty chair town hall in
    @RepTimBurchett
    ’s district without Burchett
    https://hubstatic.com/17426882.jpg

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      Looks like the small crowd my grandson gets at his ball game, LOL!

      You do realize people are individuals, and I'm sure Knoxville has some Democrats—though not many by the looks of it. Yes, it's rude for representatives not to show up, but we all know politicians are focused on their base to secure and maintain votes. In this case, it seems like they figured these are a handful of people they don't represent and decided not to bother with those they know will never vote for them.

      I get a kick out of how you skirt the internet for this kind of stuff. Not sure why, though.

      1. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        That's a Republican Town Hall... Constituents showed up and their representative didn't.   They can hide but the anger is really growing out here.   For as angry as maga was during Biden's administration, they never got up off their couch... But now we have a bipartisan movement of extremely motivated disgruntled voters

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

          Really? A town hall is for everyone to come together, period. I guess you think you know who showed up. It seems like we have many disruptive individuals at our town halls these days, some even getting combative, disrupting with their slogans and getups. It’s funny how the leftists always seem to feel the need to make a bit of a silly fuss. I could post example after example of such behavior, but that would just make me look as silly as they do.

          I prefer looking at more important issues that truly affect our Nation. I mean I think we all have become accustomed to people acting up at Town Halls. In the end, the people every four years are heard, and heard loudly. Between now and then, the president will succeed or fail.

          1. Credence2 profile image81
            Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

            The town halls are in such contention over this administration's policy may well be the just  "canary in the coal mine". It is a mistake to write all of this off as merely Liberal agitators by the Republicans.

            Let's see just how much more of this continues?

  13. Ken Burgess profile image72
    Ken Burgessposted 4 months ago

    Democrats = quotas and racism

    1. peoplepower73 profile image86
      peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      DEI stands for **Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion**. These three principles are central to creating environments where individuals from different backgrounds, identities, and perspectives feel valued, respected, and empowered.

      - **Diversity** emphasizes the presence of various identities, such as race, ethnicity, gender, age, ability, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic backgrounds, among others.

      - **Equity** focuses on fairness and addressing systemic imbalances, ensuring equal access and opportunities for everyone.

      - **Inclusion** is about fostering a sense of belonging, where everyone feels welcome and their voices are heard.

      The concept of DEI has gained prominence in recent years as organizations and societies recognize the need to tackle discrimination and inequality. However, the roots of these ideas stretch back to movements advocating for **civil rights, social justice, and equality**, such as the fight against racial segregation, women's suffrage, and LGBTQ+ rights.

      1. wilderness profile image76
        wildernessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        And DEI has lost almost 100% of it's support more recently.  As it's true goals came out the support dried up rather quickly.

        As just one example, I watched 60 minutes last week, with a main story being about a band (orchestra?) of young people that were to play with (I think) the Marine band.  They were built on the concept of DEI, and Trump's order that such a thing does not exist ended up cancelling the whole thing.  Something along the lines that the government will not participate in any form of DEI.

        CBS cried crocodile tears, repeating it was all about inclusion and diversity and we should all jump with joy about a band of young people coming together like that to share their music with all!

        There was not a single white face in that entire band of perhaps 75 students. 

        I don't think there was a single Hispanic or Asian either.  This is the "inclusion" of DEI.  This is the diversity of DEI.  And CBS made a great deal of both "facts".

        DEI is not about inclusion, it is not about diversity and it is certainly not about equity.  It is about increasing the participation of one specific race above all others.

        1. peoplepower73 profile image86
          peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

          You left out the fact that they showed that even though the band was cancelled, retired members of the band held the event for those very talented kids.

          So your one example of very talented black musicians children getting an opportunity to play with the Marine Band is an example of discrimination and invalidates DEI?

          So in other words in order for DEI to work, every event has to be one of a mixture of ethnic groups or there is no inclusion and no equity.

          Thank you for your very narrow, conservative, racial outlook of DEI.

          1. wilderness profile image76
            wildernessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

            You need another example?  Check the court records about colleges skewing entrance availability, where Asian students sued the college for their DEI garbage.  And won.

            And yes, for DEI to work, to actually mean something beyond "only black people need apply" it must apply to every case.  The absolute hypocrisy being shown by those participating in that farce is apparent and obvious discrimination.

            (Let me know if you need more examples of DEI being used to produce discrimination.  With or without media/liberal congratulations when it succeeds in doing so.)

            1. peoplepower73 profile image86
              peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

              I am glad you asked.


              1. **Workforce Representation**:
                 - Many tech companies, such as Microsoft and Intel, have focused on diversifying their workforce by increasing representation of women and underrepresented minorities in leadership roles. Intel, for example, achieved full representation in its workforce, matching the diversity of the available talent pool.

              2. **Inclusive Hiring Practices**:
                 - Companies like SAP implemented Autism at Work programs, employing individuals on the autism spectrum and creating environments that leverage their unique skills, such as attention to detail and analytical thinking.

              3. **Educational Access**:
                 - Programs like Girls Who Code provide young women with opportunities to learn coding and enter STEM fields, helping to bridge the gender gap in technology.

              4. **Community Empowerment**:
                 - Starbucks launched the “100% Pay Equity” initiative, ensuring employees across gender and racial lines are paid equally for the same work. They also established community stores in underserved areas, providing job opportunities and economic growth.

              5. **Policy Change**:
                 - In the entertainment industry, organizations like Time's Up and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have introduced inclusion requirements and guidelines to ensure diverse representation in films and awards.

              Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives can lead to tangible financial benefits for organizations. Here are some key financial outcomes observed from successful DEI efforts:

              1. **Improved Profitability**:
                 - A McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 25% more likely to achieve above-average profitability compared to companies in the bottom quartile. Similarly, ethnic and cultural diversity was linked to a 36% likelihood of outperforming profitability benchmarks.

              2. **Increased Market Share**:
                 - Inclusive companies can better understand and serve diverse customer bases, leading to increased market share and customer loyalty. For example, Procter & Gamble reported growth in their business units that focused on inclusive marketing campaigns.

              3. **Greater Innovation Revenue**:
                 - Boston Consulting Group found that companies with above-average diversity in management reported 19% higher innovation revenue—revenue from products or services launched in the past three years—compared to companies with below-average diversity.

              4. **Enhanced Employee Retention and Lower Costs**:
                 - DEI initiatives improve workplace satisfaction and reduce employee turnover, which can save organizations significant costs associated with hiring and training new employees. Gallup estimates the cost of replacing an employee is 1.5 to 2 times their annual salary, making retention strategies critical.

              5. **Attracting Investors**:
                 - Investors increasingly favor companies with strong DEI commitments as part of their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. This improves access to capital and enhances the organization’s valuation over time.

              These financial outcomes demonstrate the tangible value of prioritizing DEI, not just from a moral standpoint but also as a strategic business advantage.

              1. wilderness profile image76
                wildernessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                "DEI initiatives improve workplace satisfaction and reduce employee turnover"

                Just one of your points, but proof please that employees like knowing they were hired on the basis of skin color and will remain with the hiring company longer because of that?

                PP, you're going to have to go a long, long way to convince me that rebuilding the discrimination of the past, just with different color of those discriminated against, is good for anyone.  The people, the business, the state or city, or even the country.  I simply do not believe it.

                1. peoplepower73 profile image86
                  peoplepower73posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                  Where does it say anything about skin color in my reply? Whether you realize it or not, you are making racists comments when you are talking about skin color. I'll ask  you again.  How do you define an American?

                  1. wilderness profile image76
                    wildernessposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                    I'm absolutely positive I'm making racist comments when talking about skin color.  That's the entire point; DEI is all about color, and is all about racism and discrimination.

                    It is even worse than the old "affirmative action" concept that was absolutely racist, with it's entire being about hiring based on color.  At least it didn't try to hide it behind fine sounding rhetoric, though; it made no bones about what it was about, unlike the DEI stuff we hear today.

              2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                This perspective on DEI presents a compelling case for its benefits, particularly in terms of workforce representation, profitability, and innovation. However, it only tells one side of the story. While these initiatives can lead to positive outcomes, the other side of the coin—the concerns of those who see DEI as potentially divisive or prioritizing identity over merit—deserves acknowledgment as well. Many argue that DEI, in practice, sometimes leads to hiring and promotion decisions based on demographic factors rather than qualifications, potentially undermining workplace cohesion and fostering resentment. Others question whether forced diversity measures in industries like entertainment and tech truly reflect organic shifts in talent or if they risk becoming performative checkboxes. Ignoring these concerns doesn’t make them disappear; instead, a more balanced discussion would recognize both the successes and the unintended consequences of DEI policies.

                If merit is consistently overlooked in favor of identity-based criteria, we risk creating a society where excellence is diminished, innovation slows, and institutions lose credibility. When people perceive that success is no longer based on skill or effort, it can erode trust in businesses, academia, and government, ultimately leading to inefficiency, frustration, and stagnation. A strong and thriving society depends on ensuring that opportunity is open to all while still maintaining high standards of competence and performance.

                1. Willowarbor profile image60
                  Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

                  "If merit is consistently overlooked in favor of identity-based criteria, we risk creating a society where excellence is diminished, innovation slows, and institutions lose credibility.

                  Agreed, Pete Hegseth and RFK Jr. Are  great examples.

                  1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                    It’s interesting that you bring up Pete Hegseth and RFK Jr. as supposed examples of identity-based selection over merit. Unless I missed something, neither of them was handed their careers based on DEI policies. Hegseth, a Princeton and Harvard grad, built his platform through military service and political commentary—whether you agree with him or not. RFK Jr. comes from a political dynasty, sure, but his influence is tied to his family’s legacy, legal career, and controversial activism, not because someone pushed him forward for diversity’s sake.

                    If you’re trying to be sarcastic, it doesn’t really land. The issue at hand isn’t about people rising due to connections or name recognition—that’s always been part of politics and media. The concern with DEI policies is when identity becomes a primary factor in hiring, admissions, or promotions rather than qualifications and performance. When merit takes a backseat to checking boxes, it undermines institutions and ultimately hurts those who worked hard to earn their place.

                    It seems very easy in today’s society, especially behind a keyboard, to critique individuals who have achieved significant milestones. I always find it odd, considering the people being criticized often have extensive education, career recognition, and have truly thrived. At the end of the day, they will leave a lasting footprint—whether one agrees with them or not. The same can’t always be said for those taking cheap shots from the sidelines. If you have a real counterpoint, I’d be happy to hear it. But if you just want to throw out sarcastic jabs, you’ll have to do better than that.

                2. Willowarbor profile image60
                  Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                  "Many argue that DEI, in practice, sometimes leads to hiring and promotion decisions based on demographic factors rather than qualifications"

                  Can you give any such real world example?  And I mean in specific policy or programming related to a corporation, institution or organization.    This argument that DEI overlooks merit to "check boxes" has absolutely no basis in reality. 

                  If success was purely based on merit, the demographics of leadership positions would more closely align with the talent pool. Instead,,  just 10.4 percent are women, despite women making up nearly half the workforce. Do these figures reflect a lack of merit among women professionals; or do  they reflect systemic barriers and biases that have limited their opportunities to advance?

                  "DEI isn’t about displacing one group to elevate another; it’s about building opportunity and creating structures where everyone, regardless of their background, has a fair shot to succeed. It’s about opening doors that have been historically closed, not to take away, but to add, expanding the pool of leadership talent and enriching our collective potential."

                  It's hard to genuinely discuss these efforts when one side keeps distorting what they actually are.

                  https://seramount.com/articles/what-is-dei-really/

                  1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

                    "DEI isn’t about displacing one group to elevate another; it’s about building opportunity and creating structures where everyone, regardless of their background, has a fair shot to succeed. " Willow

                    They do, on merit.... Merit merit-based approach is rooted in the belief that qualifications, experience, and ability should come before identity factors like race, gender, or political affiliations. So very simple, with no other agenda but merit.

  14. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    Ro Khanna just slammed Republican Representative David Valadao for not showing up for his constituents. Valadao has refused to host a townhall, so Khanna is doing one in his district... Midterms can't get here quick enough.

    https://x.com/DemocraticWins/status/1903893100872810753

  15. Credence2 profile image81
    Credence2posted 4 months ago

    Imperial Wizard Hirem Evens of the Ku Klux Klan, in charge of the parade march down Pennsylvania Ave in Washington DC exactly 100 years ago defined the “real American” as White, Anglo Saxon and Protestant.

    He said:
    We found our great cities and the control of much of our industry and commerce taken over by strangers, who stacked the cards of success and prosperity against us,” Evans would write in the North American Review the next year. “Shortly they came to dominate our government.” Evans was skeptical of the assimilability of Jews, Catholics, and recent immigrants, and believed that Black people were simply naturally inferior to their white betters.

    Hmm, with the exception of a tweet here and there, this expresses the sentiment of the Trumpian Right, today. Witness today’s Xenophobia and the threat that these outsiders pose to “real Americans”, and the very certainty that they would never assimilate. Combine that with the racism that is expressed as part of this DEI schtick and you have indistinguishable people from those a century ago who subscribe to Trump philosophy without the white sheets.

    Yes, there have been minor tweets and changes to some of the optics but the fundamentals are unchanged even though a century has passed.

  16. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    They just won't leave these poor Republicans alone will they?  Representatives continue to run and hide from their constituents...

    More than 900 people gathered Saturday morning for what was billed as a People’s Town Hall at the Kentucky Theatre. Many waited in line to address an empty chair on stage next to a sign that said “Reserved for Congressman Andy Barr.”

    Why don't they want to show up and talk about all of their wonderful "progress"?  My god, so much to be proud of right? 

    Brady Blanton of Richmond... "I’m not a paid protester; I’m a blue collar worker,” Blanton said. “I am a child of Social Security survivors benefits and Medicaid after my father passed away 15 years ago and they kept my family afloat.”

    Blanton, 26, told the Lantern he works for a plastics manufacturer in Winchester. He said he still depends on Medicaid to provide his 2-year-old daughter’s health insurance and that he worries that the cuts to Veterans Affairs will hurt his grandfather, a veteran of the Vietnam War.

    Blanton noted that the U.S. House’s budget blueprint would increase defense spending by $100 billion while cutting $880 billion from health and human services such as Medicaid, which covers 196,729 people in the 6th Congressional District or 26% of Barr’s constituents. Almost 1 in 3 Kentuckians are enrolled in Medicaid....OH WELL... 

    https://hubstatic.com/17428045_f1024.jpg

    https://www.alternet.org/andy-barr/

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      Congressman Andy Barr  Facebook

      "I want to address the handful of people who falsely claim they cannot reach anyone in my office or that I “refuse to hold town hall meetings.” Let me set the record straight.
      Every day, my staff and I meet with constituents. Every day, we take phone calls, respond to emails and letters, and work diligently to resolve casework—regardless of political affiliation. We host monthly office hours in every county of the Sixth Congressional District as part of my ongoing accessibility initiative. We’ve done this consistently for 13 years, and I’m proud to lead one of the most accessible, professional, and responsive congressional staffs in the country.
      What we will not do is provide a forum for individuals more interested in shouting and grandstanding than engaging in a respectful and constructive conversation. Our goal is to foster real dialogue—not theatrics.
      That’s why we’re hosting a telephone town hall on Monday—to ensure a productive exchange of views in a civil environment where everyone has a chance to be heard."

  17. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 4 months ago

    Wow this is a unique one...

    Simultaneous US/Canada Border Protest Sends Trump Reeling
    A simultaneous on both sides of the Detroit River sent a loud message to Trump from both the US and Canada....

    Protests are becoming a very regular and growing feature.  We haven't seen anything like this in a very long time. So many people, so unhappy.

    https://www.thedailypoliticususa.com/p/ … er-protest

    1. Credence2 profile image81
      Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

      Here is another one. This is getting to be a habit with the GOP, absentee representatives. Long article, but it appears that people in Montana are pissed off. I lived there for 3 years and trust me, they are no-nonsense people.

      So, Bring on the pitchforks, tar and feathers, let the angst spread nationwide. I am delighted….


      https://www.alternet.org/montana-town-hall/

      There has even been a rumble in staunchly red Utah at another town hall, KUTV Salt Lake City reports.

      https://kutv.com/news/politics/utah-tow … ke-kennedy

      1. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

        The representatives did offer statements explaining their reasons for not attending the town hall meetings in Billings and Bozeman.

        Senator Steve Daines' office stated that he frequently meets with Montanans through various public forums and that he does not attend events organized by groups like Indivisible. They described the organization as a "far-left group" funded by what they called the "radical wing of the Democrat party." They further explained that Senator Daines' time is committed to engaging with constituents through other means.

        Senator Tim Sheehy's office echoed similar sentiments, calling Indivisible a "radical group" and specifically mentioning their opposition to policies like funding the police and abolishing ICE. Sheehy’s office stated that the event was politically biased, which influenced his decision not to attend.

        Representative Troy Downing also expressed his decision not to attend these town halls, citing concerns about the political nature of the organizers. His office did not provide a detailed public statement but aligned with the concerns raised by Daines and Sheehy.

        The representatives' offices defended their choices, framing their absence as a result of political differences with the event organizers.

        1. Credence2 profile image81
          Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

          But again, they could be just excuses from the representatives afraid to face irate constituents with legitimate complaints regarding this administrations policies. These representatives are there to serve all in their district regardless of their political orientation. It is not a good look to be seen as not wanting to engage with those that put you in office. If the ramifications of this continues it can’t be seen as anything other than entirely negative for GOP prospects in the near future.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

            Your point is understandable—representatives should be willing to engage with all constituents, regardless of political leanings. However, I think it's also fair to acknowledge that town halls have increasingly become less about discussion and more about spectacle, particularly when bad-faith actors seek to disrupt rather than debate. If Republican lawmakers are genuinely concerned that these events are being hijacked by far-left activists who have no interest in constructive dialogue, their hesitation is at least understandable.

            That said, avoiding town halls altogether does come with risks. Optics matter, and if GOP representatives are perceived as unwilling to face voters, it could alienate supporters and weaken their standing ahead of future elections. Perhaps a better solution would be to structure these events in a way that minimizes disruptions—controlled forums, moderated Q&A sessions, or virtual town halls that still allow engagement while limiting opportunities for grandstanding.

            The reality is that Republicans will always face hostile media coverage, so refusing to engage at all might give the left exactly what they want—an easy narrative about the GOP being “afraid” of the voters. Instead, they should be strategic, ensuring they still connect with their constituents while preventing the left from dominating the conversation for a quick news clip.

            I think they should take a page from Trump's playbook—show up, be direct, take questions, and cut through the political act. Voters appreciate honesty and strength, not rehearsed talking points or avoidance.

            1. Willowarbor profile image60
              Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

              Have you listened to the questioning from constituents at these town halls? Overall the questions are presented in a very calm, very respectful manner by mostly folks who look like senior citizens... I will make sure to start posting footage from these people specifically

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                I don't focus much on media coverage of town halls, as I feel they often highlight one hyperbolic moment and ignore the rest of the conversation. I prefer to respect journalism that focuses on the full spectrum of discussion. Town halls generally represent a small group of citizens, and I think that those who are most upset tend to be the ones who show up. It's unfortunate, but it leads to a skewed view of the issues at hand. One side of a coin.

                1. Credence2 profile image81
                  Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                  That “small group” may well be a representative sample who congresspersons ignore at their own peril. Can they afford to?

                  1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                    Good point—sometimes a small but vocal group is actually a sign of a much bigger issue, and politicians ignore them at their own risk. If the frustrations at this town hall reflect what a lot of voters are feeling, dismissing them could definitely backfire in 2026. But at the same time, there are plenty of reasons why this issue might not have a big impact on the elections.

                    For one, just because a group is loud doesn’t mean they represent the majority. If their concerns don’t match up with what most voters care about, their influence will be pretty limited. Politicians pay more attention to big-picture trends, like polling and fundraising, rather than isolated town halls. Plus, if this doesn’t get major media attention, it’s unlikely to gain much traction beyond that room. And even if it does, politicians are pretty skilled at shifting the narrative or downplaying dissent.

                    Another thing to consider is that voter priorities change. What people are mad about today might not even be on their minds in 2026, especially if bigger issues like the economy or foreign policy take over. And let’s be real—partisan loyalty still runs deep. Even if people are frustrated, a lot of them will still vote along party lines, so a congressperson ignoring this group might not hurt them much in the long run.

            2. Credence2 profile image81
              Credence2posted 4 months agoin reply to this

              There are many republicans that attend that take issue with cuts in a way and manner far beyond any expectation as Musk’s chainsaw decimates families along with government services. So, it is not all indignant lefties that protest the administration policies. I think that you will see that as there will be more of these relatively uncivil town halls in surprisingly ruby red states and districts.

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                Don't fall over---I agree

                1. Miebakagh57 profile image84
                  Miebakagh57posted 4 months agoin reply to this

                  Same here.

      2. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 4 months agoin reply to this

        In November 2026, all 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 33 of the 100 seats in the U.S. Senate will be up for election. Also there will be special elections for two Senate seats in Ohio and Florida.. reckoning day is coming.  Constituents will not forget the actions of these representatives.

  18. Miebakagh57 profile image84
    Miebakagh57posted 4 months ago

    Who's an America?

  19. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    Maga looney Victoria Spartz, from a deep red Indiana district,  presided over an absolutely raucous Town Hall..yeah, happy people everywhere lol.. I was happy to see constituents address  the Whiskey Pete signal controversy...

    https://x.com/cwebbonline/status/1905829630818259221

    https://x.com/MarcoFoster_/status/1905773705525092852

    https://x.com/DaniellaMicaela/status/19 … 7921963407

  20. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    DEI has been  intentionally misrepresented by maga.  They play on tired, dangerous tropes about the scary, incompetent woman or person of color who is trying to take things away from ‘regular’ white  people. It's been turned into a slur.  Maga would have us believe that DEI is all about and based upon reverse discrimination. It is not. 

    These initiatives  don't mean lowering the bar; they are all about  giving everyone a fair shot at the same bar.

    DEI does not suggest hiring less-qualified candidates, but meritocracy can only exist when everyone has an equal chance to compete. 

    A real life corporate example?

    JPMorgan Chase..."The ‘e’ always meant equal opportunity to us, not equal outcomes,”  COO Jenn Piepszak said in an HR memo.   They're not getting rid of DEI but rebranding and more accurately identifying their efforts. 

    We can't really have a genuine discussion about DEI if one side keeps purposely misrepresenting what it's all about and pretending that it's reality. 

    https://www.hrdive.com/news/jp-morgan-d … es/743707/

    https://www.careercircle.com/blog/post/ … it-matters

  21. Miebakagh57 profile image84
    Miebakagh57posted 3 months ago

    A black or white person, even a blue guy, that has achieved educational success...and make they mark significantly in public sphere should be louded, and not accussed of bias.                                      Knowledge and success is not execlussive to any race.

  22. Readmikenow profile image83
    Readmikenowposted 3 months ago

    From the Harvard Law Review

    Why Diversity Programs Fail

    Summary.   After Wall Street firms repeatedly had to shell out millions to settle discrimination lawsuits, businesses started to get serious about their efforts to increase diversity. But unfortunately, they don’t seem to be getting results: Women and minorities have not gained much ground in management over the past 20 years. The problem is, organizations are trying to reduce bias with the same kinds of programs they’ve been using since the 1960s. And the usual tools—diversity training, hiring tests, performance ratings, grievance systems—tend to make things worse, not better. The authors’ analysis of data from 829 firms over three decades shows that these tools actually decrease the proportion of women and minorities in management. They’re designed to preempt lawsuits by policing managers’ decisions and actions. But as lab studies show, this kind of force-feeding can activate bias and encourage rebellion. However, in their analysis the authors uncovered numerous diversity tactics that do move the needle, such as recruiting initiatives, mentoring programs, and diversity task forces. They engage managers in solving the problem, increase contact with women and minority workers, and promote social accountability. In this article, the authors dig into the data, executive interviews, and several examples to shed light on what doesn’t work and what does.

    Businesses started caring a lot more about diversity after a series of high-profile lawsuits rocked the financial industry. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Morgan Stanley shelled out $54 million—and Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch more than $100 million each—to settle sex discrimination claims. In 2007, Morgan was back at the table, facing a new class action, which cost the company $46 million. In 2013, Bank of America Merrill Lynch settled a race discrimination suit for $160 million. Cases like these brought Merrill’s total 15-year payout to nearly half a billion dollars.

    It’s no wonder that Wall Street firms now require new hires to sign arbitration contracts agreeing not to join class actions. They have also expanded training and other diversity programs. But on balance, equality isn’t improving in financial services or elsewhere. Although the proportion of managers at U.S. commercial banks who were Hispanic rose from 4.7% in 2003 to 5.7% in 2014, white women’s representation dropped from 39% to 35%, and Black men’s from 2.5% to 2.3%. The numbers were even worse in investment banks (though that industry is shrinking, which complicates the analysis). Among all U.S. companies with 100 or more employees, the proportion of Black men in management increased just slightly—from 3% to 3.3%—from 1985 to 2014. White women saw bigger gains from 1985 to 2000—rising from 22% to 29% of managers—but their numbers haven’t budged since then. Even in Silicon Valley, where many leaders tout the need to increase diversity for both business and social justice reasons, bread-and-butter tech jobs remain dominated by white men.

    It shouldn’t be surprising that most diversity programs aren’t increasing diversity. Despite a few new bells and whistles, courtesy of big data, companies are basically doubling down on the same approaches they’ve used since the 1960s—which often make things worse, not better. Firms have long relied on diversity training to reduce bias on the job, hiring tests and performance ratings to limit it in recruitment and promotions, and grievance systems to give employees a way to challenge managers. Those tools are designed to preempt lawsuits by policing managers’ thoughts and actions. Yet laboratory studies show that this kind of force-feeding can activate bias rather than stamp it out. As social scientists have found, people often rebel against rules to assert their autonomy. Try to coerce me to do X, Y, or Z, and I’ll do the opposite just to prove that I’m my own person.

    In analyzing three decades’ worth of data from more than 800 U.S. firms and interviewing hundreds of line managers and executives at length, we’ve seen that companies get better results when they ease up on the control tactics. It’s more effective to engage managers in solving the problem, increase their on-the-job contact with female and minority workers, and promote social accountability—the desire to look fair-minded. That’s why interventions such as targeted college recruitment, mentoring programs, self-managed teams, and task forces have boosted diversity in businesses. Some of the most effective solutions aren’t even designed with diversity in mind.

    Here, we dig into the data, the interviews, and company examples to shed light on what doesn’t work and what does.

    Why You Can’t Just Outlaw Bias
    Executives favor a classic command-and-control approach to diversity because it boils expected behaviors down to dos and don’ts that are easy to understand and defend. Yet this approach also flies in the face of nearly everything we know about how to motivate people to make changes. Decades of social science research point to a simple truth: You won’t get managers on board by blaming and shaming them with rules and reeducation. Let’s look at how the most common top-down efforts typically go wrong.

    Diversity training. Do people who undergo training usually shed their biases? Researchers have been examining that question since before World War II, in nearly a thousand studies. It turns out that while people are easily taught to respond correctly to a questionnaire about bias, they soon forget the right answers. The positive effects of diversity training rarely last beyond a day or two, and a number of studies suggest that it can activate bias or spark a backlash. Nonetheless, nearly half of midsize companies use it, as do nearly all the Fortune 500.

  23. Readmikenow profile image83
    Readmikenowposted 3 months ago

    Couldn't disagree more.

    Do you know about K. Harris and Willie Brown?  He was a married man 30 years her senior whom she dated.  It was Willie Brown's influence that created K. Harris political career.  She had NOTHING until she started dating a married man three decades older than herself.

    I don't care how many votes biden/harris received.  She got the position because biden refused to pick any other person as VP unless they were a black woman.  Talk about sexism and racism.  No man could be picked as biden's vp and no woman who was white, Asian, or Hispanic could be chosen.  This makes her VP pick based on DEI.

    She was a horrible VP.  Accomplished absolutely nothing.

    Was GIVEN the nomination to run for president.  Unlike every other democrat nominee before her, she didn't even go through a primary process.

    She was a horrible presidential candidate.

    Her entire political career she has been given things because of her skin color and race or because she dated the right men.

    K. Harris is a good example as to why DEI should be terminated.

    1. Willowarbor profile image60
      Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Can you cite a real world DEI policy currently in use at corporation or institution that you can find that uses  quotas based on race or gender?  I would really like someone, anyone, to point out real life examples of actual documented DEI initiatives that exist at real companies, in the real world.  Because all I see right now are inaccurate statements that  right-wing individuals often misrepresenting DEI initiatives, leading to misconceptions and a divisive rhetoric.

      1. Readmikenow profile image83
        Readmikenowposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        You need to read some of my previous responses on this thred.

        I've provided plenty.

        1. Willowarbor profile image60
          Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          No, you actually haven't provided any.  Cite a corporate dei policy or initiative that is currently in use.  Or alternatively states a commonly accepted definition of the DEI framework.  Any company that uses the policy, has it laid out in writing...

    2. Credence2 profile image81
      Credence2posted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Well, Mike we are going to have to agree to disagree.

      As far as I am concerned “DEI” is a dog whistle and is coded as basically racial and gender based slurs.

      When people who don't appreciate that learn more about it, it will not be a good look for Trumpicans, Conservatives or Republicans….

  24. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    https://hubstatic.com/17437654_f1024.jpg


    https://hubstatic.com/17437655_f1024.jpg


    https://hubstatic.com/17437657_f1024.jpg

  25. Credence2 profile image81
    Credence2posted 3 months ago

    Purrfect article. I love it, instead of DEI, its WEI, white, entitled and incompetent. So, what do we make of that? Is that not what we are seeing with the F-Troop bumbler associated with Signalgate?


    https://www.salon.com/2025/03/31/signal … -hysteria/

    1. Willowarbor profile image60
      Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Yes! I very much enjoy Salon.

      "Trump has reinforced that belief, proving Lyndon B. Johnson right when Johnson said, “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.” I guess you can call Donald Trump the pick-pocketing pied piper…".

      I think that this theme of  "we hate the same people" undergirds the entire administration.  It is his most powerful connection to the base. It resonates with a group who is feeling fearful that they are losing control . It's all about using race based anger to motivate.  Trump has always had a nose for victimhood..he has turned white anxiety into a movement.  And the byproduct is absolutely maintaining mediocrity. 

      I think that the debate is not about DEI, it's about power.

      1. Credence2 profile image81
        Credence2posted 3 months agoin reply to this

        Thanks, Willow, I confess that it is strong stuff. It is unfortunate that when LBJ made that comment so long ago, so much of it still rings true, DEI is a case in point. Under close analysis, I guess that we have not move forward as far as we all would like to believe.

        It is about power and control at the expense of others seeking a greater level of parity.

        I am glad that you enjoyed the article as it cuts to the chase as few others have.

  26. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
    Kathleen Cochranposted 3 months ago

    "You clearly sit in judgment and feel you have the full right to demean a stranger's character."

    She does it all the time.

  27. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    Trump approval falls to 43%, lowest since returning to office, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds...

    And this was just before Liberation day.. I'm sure the public is happier today, right?  Maga getting what you voted for. Tell us again how much you suffered under Biden's economy..

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … 788932007/

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

      April 3 2025  Published Apr 03, 2025 at 8:33 AM EDT
      Updated Apr 03, 2025 at 10:18 AM EDT

      Donald Trump's Approval Rating Is Actually Rising With Democrats

      Donald Trump's Job Approval Rating
      Polling average for 04/03/25

      Newsweek's average of the 10 most recently published polls shows that Trump's approval rating currently stands at 47 percent, while 49 percent disapprove.

      It comes as many polls have shown his approval rating on the decline. A poll conducted by Marquette University Law School between March 17 to March 27 among 1,021 adults showed that Trump's approval rating had dropped to 46 percent, while 54 percent said they disapproved. In January, 48 percent approved and 52 percent disapproved. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
      https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-a … ls-2054706

      1. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        I think very few people are happy with the tariffs and the Liberation Day celebration.  His approval rating is circling the drain from here.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

          I try not to predict how people feel. Polls only reflect the opinions of a specific group, and while some are more reliable than others, they all have limitations. I also believe we're witnessing a knee-jerk reaction to the tariffs, which I expected would happen.

          I recognized that tariffs would cause significant disruption, and they have. All I can do is share my perspective. I voted for change, and I support Trump’s efforts to achieve fair trade. The polls suggest that some people weren’t realistic in understanding that his agenda would bring major upheaval. It seems that some lack the fortitude to wait and see how things unfold—they’re already wringing their hands.

          I was surprised he chose a blanket type venue on al that trade with the US, and announced steep new tariffs on all imports with extra penalties for many of America’s top trading partners. In my view, erecting a protectionist barrier around the world’s largest economy in a watershed shift for US international economic policy. 

          No president has ever done this. It will be very interesting to watch it play out. He did leave the door open for negotiations on placed tariffs. Which I think is possitive.Perhaps trade agreements will emerge with negotiations.

  28. IslandBites profile image69
    IslandBitesposted 3 months ago

    U.S. stocks plunge following Trump tariff shock

    President Donald Trump's shock announcement that he would impose historic tariffs on virtually all U.S. imports shattered markets Thursday, an emphatic rebuke by investors of his effort to reorder global trade.

    As of late mornings, trillions of dollars were wiped out as the S&P 500 tumbled more than 4%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 3.4%, or 1,400 points, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq dropped more than 5.4%.

    Small business are also set to be hit hard by the tariffs. The Russell 2000 Index, which tracks smaller publicly traded companies, was down 6.6%. It has now lost more than 20% since its peak in November.

    In the wake of Wednesday's announcement, analysts are already raising alarms about the potential for a recession.

    Happy Liberation Day!

  29. abwilliams profile image78
    abwilliamsposted 3 months ago

    The general consensus for those not opposed to every step Donald Trump takes, and not on board with Government corruptuon and abuse, nor the U.S. taken advantage of at every turn, for decades... understand that it will take some time to rectify.

    1. Willowarbor profile image60
      Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      How much is your portfolio losing today?  I find it really odd that the people who say the market tanking and people losing their retirement savings is a-okay are the same people who were complaining they couldn't live another day paying more for eggs...

      And all of this tariff nonsense is fully about funding the tax cut for the wealthy off of the back of the middle class.  Nothing more and he thinks people are stupid enough to buy it

  30. abwilliams profile image78
    abwilliamsposted 3 months ago

    I am patient.... except in traffic, with dang tourists, then I am not very patient, I will admit!

  31. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    "51% of Americans disapprove of Donald Trump's job performance and 43% approve, a net approval of -8. That's down 5 points from last week."

    That makes sense when you consider he’s doing an objectively terrible job..  the ongoing tariffs fiasco, the status of  retirement accounts and the still-high cost of living while routinely showing up on television babbling like a man  in mental decline.... 

    https://today.yougov.com/politics/artic … ougov-poll

  32. Sharlee01 profile image84
    Sharlee01posted 3 months ago

    April 12 2025
    Rasmussen Reports poll from April 11 showed an approval rating of 48%.
    A Civiqs Poll from April 10 showed that 54% of respondents had an unfavorable opinion of Trump and 44% had a favorable opinion.

    The Economist shows that 45% of people are favorable of Trump and 52% are unfavorable of him, according to the latest update from April 9.

    According to the latest HarrisX poll, conducted between April 4 and April 7 among 1,883 registered voters, Trump's net approval rating has dropped to -2, with 47 percent approving and 49 percent disapproving. That is down from a net approval rating of +9 points in February, when 52 percent approved and 43 percent disapproved.

    How does Trump's approval rating compare with his 1st term?
    Trump had a final approval rating of 34% when he left office in 2021. His approval average during his first term was 41%.
    https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/po … 049199007/

  33. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    Oh my...the "support" at MTG'S.  Attempt at a town hall ..
    Cops tazed a man and they manhandled an older guy...

    Because nothing says “small government and free speech” like electrocuting dissent in a public forum....

    https://x.com/ArtCandee/status/1912296019527889310

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

      It appears many were there to shut down free speech, repeatedly disrupting the event—shouting, cursing, and in some cases, resisting police as they were escorted out. To truly understand what happened, one only needs to watch several YouTube videos for the full picture. One X clip does not show what factually occurred.

      The speaker deserved the fundamental right to be heard without constant interruptions as she attempted to share her views through free speech. Unfortunately, many on the left seem to believe that shouting down opposing voices and resorting to belligerent behavior is an acceptable way to express their own opinions—even if it means silencing others in the process. But free speech is not a one-sided privilege; it's a cornerstone of civil discourse that must be protected for everyone, even when views differ. If we abandon that principle, we risk losing the very foundation that allows for meaningful dialogue and a truly open society.

      1. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        I watched the entire event as it happened.  You don't tase people for making comments... Even if they are out of turn.   


        This amount of force on an elderly man is completely unacceptable.
        https://x.com/sumit45678901/status/1912489515509227981

      2. peoplepower73 profile image86
        peoplepower73posted 3 months agoin reply to this

        Despite a court order, a reporter and photographer from The Associated Press were barred from an Oval Office news conference on Monday with President Donald Trump and his counterpart from El Salvador, Nayib Bukele.

        Last week’s federal court decision forbidding the Trump administration from punishing the AP for refusing to rename the Gulf of Mexico was to take effect Monday. The administration is appealing the decision and arguing with the news outlet over whether it needs to change anything until those appeals are exhausted.

        The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit set a Thursday hearing on Trump’s request that any changes be delayed while case is reviewed. The AP is fighting for more access as soon as possible.

        Later Monday, two AP photographers were admitted to an event honoring Ohio State’s championship football team on the more spacious South Lawn. A text reporter was turned away.

        Since mid-February, AP reporters and photographers have been blocked from attending events in the Oval Office, where President Donald Trump frequently addresses journalists, and on Air Force One. The AP has seen sporadic access elsewhere, and regularly covers White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s briefings. Leavitt is one of three administration officials named in the AP’s lawsuit.
        Until being blocked by Trump, AP has traditionally always had a reporter and photographer among the small group of journalists invited into the Oval Office. McFadden did not order that to be restored, only that no news organization should be shut out because the president objects to its news decisions — under a principle called “viewpoint discrimination.”

        “No other news organization in the United States receives the level of guaranteed access previously bestowed upon the AP,” the administration argued in court papers over the weekend. “The AP may have grown accustomed to its favored status, but the Constitution does not require that such status endure in perpetuity.”

        https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics … ocialshare

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

          While the narrative suggests that AP reporters were unlawfully barred from a Trump-Bukele Oval Office press conference despite a court order, this claim is not entirely factual or complete. The court ruling in question did not specifically mandate that the Associated Press be granted immediate access to all White House events starting Monday—it addressed the broader principle of viewpoint discrimination. The ruling did not include an injunction forcing the White House to restore AP access by that date; instead, the administration is within its legal rights to appeal the decision and seek a stay, which is exactly what they did. The U.S. Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing for later in the week to consider that request, suggesting that legal proceedings were still ongoing and no final enforcement action was required as of Monday.

          Furthermore, the AP was not entirely shut out of all events that day—photographers were granted access to the South Lawn event with the Ohio State football team, which undermines the notion of total exclusion. It’s also relevant that the AP has continued to receive access to White House briefings and some other events, even if sporadic, which weakens claims of complete retaliation. The administration’s argument that no outlet is constitutionally entitled to special or permanent access to the Oval Office also introduces a valid constitutional and procedural question: whether any news outlet, including the AP, has the legal right to preferential access. So while the optics of exclusion may seem retaliatory, the actual legal and factual circumstances are more nuanced than the summary implies.

          The Trump administration filed an appeal following a federal court ruling that ordered the White House to restore the Associated Press’s (AP) access to presidential events. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden issued the initial ruling on April 8, 2025, mandating the lifting of access restrictions placed on the AP. The administration filed its appeal shortly thereafter, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit scheduled a hearing for Thursday, April 17, 2025, to consider the administration's request to delay implementing the ruling while the appeal is under review    https://www.reuters.com/business/media- … hatgpt.com

          Thus far, the administration has gotten a reprieve due to the appeal.  I trust the court will rule justly.

          ​ Attorney General Pam Bondi stated that the U.S. government had offered to provide a plane to “facilitate” Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s return from El Salvador, contingent on the Salvadoran government agreeing to release him. She emphasized that the administration understood the Supreme Court’s directive to “facilitate” his return as requiring logistical support—such as offering transportation—rather than forcing another sovereign nation to comply. “President Bukele said he was not sending him back. That’s the end of the story,” Bondi said. Based on her efforts, it appears she has attempted to fulfill the Court’s order. Given El Salvador’s sovereign authority, it’s unclear what more she could realistically do without the cooperation of President Bukele.

      3. Willowarbor profile image60
        Willowarborposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        LOL, maga are not the ones to talk about free speech at this moment in time... Should we count the ways dear leader is clamping down? 

        But in terms of marjories town hall, free speech? That's laughable. She screamed the questions ahead of time and screened the people who were to be let in... She wanted sycophants.  It backfired spectacularly.  This bunch is an embarrassment to the country

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 3 months agoin reply to this

          I believe free speech truly thrives when individuals are allowed to speak without interruption and given the space to fully express their views, followed by thoughtful and respectful debate. There’s no need for shouting, profanity, or attempts to silence others. In my experience, many liberal protesters have repeatedly shown that they’re not interested in open dialogue—they’re often actively working to shut it down. To me, that’s not a defense of free speech; it’s a clear rejection of it.

  34. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    Marjorie Taylor Greene’s town hall debacle is less a democratic exercise and more a masterclass in irony...

    shutting down dissent while decrying disruptions, all from a stage built on exclusion. Screening questions, locking out constituents, and then clutching pearls when the crowd gets rowdy? That’s not a town hall; that’s a coronation with a side of chaos, complete with tasers for the uninvited. But let’s not pretend this is about principle. While she’s busy playing the martyr, her stock portfolio tells a different story...scooping up shares in a tariff-induced market dip, turning Trump’s trade wars into her personal windfall. Funny how “protecting national interests” looks a lot like protecting her bank account, all on a humble congressional salary. Democracy demands open dialogue, not a curated echo chamber where the only voices heard are the ones cheering loudest...or the ones silenced by force. If Marjorie truly believed in the voting booth, she’d let her constituents speak without fear of being dragged out in handcuffs.

  35. tsmog profile image75
    tsmogposted 3 months ago

    How about a cup of coffee or a glass of ice tea. Read a Substack post about Greene's town hall from a source that is not mainstream.

    BUTCH-BODIED BANSHEE: MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE’S TOWN HALL ENDS IN TASERS, SCREAMS, AND SELF-DELUSION by Closer to the Edge (Apr 16, 2025)
    https://closertotheedge.substack.com/p/ … irect=true

    "Welcome to Cobb County, Georgia — where a MAGA matriarch held a so-called town hall in the bluest pocket of her blood-red district and got exactly what she wanted: chaos, cameras, and three arrests.

        “I’m glad they got thrown out. That’s exactly what I wanted to see happen,” Greene said after the event, without a trace of irony or self-awareness. “This isn’t a political rally or a protest. I held a town hall tonight. You know who was out of line? The protesters.”

    Let’s be clear: this wasn’t a conversation. It was a performance — choreographed repression wrapped in the veneer of public service. IDs were checked at the door. Constituents had to prove their ZIP codes. Reporters weren’t allowed to speak to attendees. And questions? Those were pre-screened, filtered for obedience, and recited like a school play script Greene barely skimmed."

    Subheadings

    ** TWO TASERS, THREE ARRESTS, ONE FASCIST CIRCUS
    ** MARJORIE’S MARTYR COMPLEX IS SHOWING
    ** DOGE, DECEPTION, AND DISTRICT DISASTER
    ** CROSS-FIT FOR THEOCRATS, FANTASY FOR FASCISTS
    ** TASERS AND THEOCRACY: WHAT COMES NEXT
    ** THEATER OF THE ABSURD

  36. abwilliams profile image78
    abwilliamsposted 3 months ago
    1. tsmog profile image75
      tsmogposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I got a bigger kick out of the one below it.

      https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1492894418030848

  37. Willowarbor profile image60
    Willowarborposted 3 months ago

    Oh gosh .. Bernie and AOC draw almost 10,000 in Montana, similar numbers in Idaho and Utah....I know, I know they're preaching to the choir in those States right?  Wow If only they would get out of their safe havens..  LMAO

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)