Trump's Big Beautiful Bold Agenda to Reclaim America
EXCUSE ME, I WAS PROMISED THAT MY RATES WOULD BE SLASHED BY 50%
Historical U.S. Average Retail Electricity Prices (Residential, in cents/kWh, EIA data)
Obama (2009–2016)
In 2009, average residential electricity was about 11.5¢/kWh.
By 2016, it had risen to around 12.5¢/kWh.
That’s a steady increase of ~9% across his two terms.
The rise was linked to natural gas volatility and large investments in grid and renewable capacity.
Trump 45 (2017–2020)
In 2017, the rate was about 12.9¢/kWh.
By 2020, it was still right around 13.0¢/kWh.
So basically flat—prices didn’t move much during his term.
Contributing factors: cheap natural gas from the shale boom, relatively mild inflation, and slower growth in electricity demand.
Biden (2021–present)
U.S. Average Residential Electricity Prices (¢/kWh) — 2021 to 2024
2021: 13.66¢/kWh — the year Biden took office.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
2022: 15.04¢/kWh — a sharp jump from the previous year.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
The Department of Energy's Energy.gov
2023: 16.00¢/kWh — continued upward trend, though a bit slower.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
2024: 16.48¢/kWh — a slight increase, marking a total rise over Biden’s term
Trump 47 --- From industry-tracking sources like Choose Energy, the average residential electricity rate in August 2025 is estimated to be 17.47 ¢/kWh, an increase of 1.40.
It's very evident that costs shot up under Biden. And has also risen $1.40 in the first 8 months under Trump.
Biden (2021–2024): ~13.7¢ → 16.7¢ → ~22% in just 4 years (about double Obama’s 8-year rise, and far higher than Trump’s flat term). In my view, Biden presided over a historic leap in residential electricity costs, both in speed and in scale, driven by inflation, higher natural gas prices (especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine), and policy shifts toward renewables with heavy infrastructure spending and heavy regulations. It will be interesting to see if Trump can keep his promise regarding decreasing energy costs.AI..
"According to data and recent reports, average U.S. residential electricity prices have risen in 2025 under the new Trump administration compared to the preceding year. Residential electricity prices are up: The average residential electricity price in the U.S. increased by 6.7% from June 2024 to June 2025... "
Energy prices are rising under Trump."According to data and recent reports, average U.S. residential electricity prices have risen in 2025 under the new Trump administration compared to the preceding year." Willow
It appears you did not read my comment or perhaps did not pick up context--
"It's very evident that costs shot up under Biden. And has also risen $1.40 in the first 8 months under Trump." Shar
" Residential electricity prices are up: The average residential electricity price in the U.S. increased by 6.7% from June 2024 to June 2025... "Willow
Monthly Breakdown of Residential Electricity Price Increases (June 2024 – June 2025):
June 2024: The average residential electricity price was 16.26 cents per kWh.
July 2024: Prices rose to 16.61 cents per kWh, marking a 2.1% increase from June.
August 2024: The average price increased to 16.61 cents per kWh, maintaining the July rate.
September 2024: Prices rose to 16.82 cents per kWh, a 1.3% increase from August.
October 2024: The average price increased to 16.93 cents per kWh, a 0.7% rise from September.
November 2024: Prices rose to 17.00 cents per kWh, a 0.4% increase from October.
December 2024: The average price decreased slightly to 16.26 cents per kWh, a 4.4% decrease from November.
January 2025: Prices increased to 15.95 cents per kWh, a 4.0% rise from December.
February 2025: The average price increased to 16.44 cents per kWh, a 3.1% rise from January.
March 2025: Prices rose to 17.11 cents per kWh, a 4.1% increase from February.
April 2025: The average price increased to 17.45 cents per kWh, a 2.0% rise from March.
May 2025: Prices rose to 17.47 cents per kWh, a 0.1% increase from April.
June 2025: The average price increased to 17.47 cents per kWh, maintaining the May rate.
Quick Electricity https://quickelectricity.com/cost-of-el … hatgpt.com
Looking at the numbers, the majority of the 6.7% increase in U.S. residential electricity prices, from 16.26¢/kWh in June 2024 to 17.47¢/kWh in June 2025, happened during 2024, under President Biden. From June to December 2024, prices rose about 4.5%, while the first six months of 2025, under President Trump, added only about 2.2% to the total increase. In other words, most of the price jump occurred before Trump took office.
I feel like sometimes research isn’t thorough enough, and important context gets missed. I was just trying to add some facts, because, as a rule, facts help people form a solid opinion. A single-line chart doesn’t really show the whole picture, though it did prompt me to dig into the statistics. From what I saw, there was a steady increase in electricity prices over Obama’s tenure, a relatively flat trend under Trump 45, and then a sky is the limit during Biden’s time in office. I mean, were you concerned when Biden had historic rises in energy costs?
It is very obvious that we have seen a slight increase, as I said clearly in my comment ... But Joe is still the big winner on shooting up prices on everything.'It is very obvious that we have seen a slight increase, as I said clearly in my comment ... But Joe is still the big winner on shooting up prices on everything.
The bottom line....the prices under the current Trump regime are HIGHER than what was seen under Biden. The numbers are going in the wrong direction. We were promised a 50% reduction in energy but instead we get higher prices.
And as far as Biden shooting up prices on "everything"? Again,... The short answer from AI..
"This increase in prices, or inflation, followed the pandemic and was driven by a complex interplay of factors, many of which can be attributed to the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. "
And AGAIN... TRUMP HAS PRICES RISING FROM THAT POINT.
.We Found the Hidden Cost of Data Centers. It's in Your Electric Bill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN6BEUA4jNU
There are two types of people in America today... those that try and find any way they can to blame Trump for whatever ill is going on... and those that actually go looking for the reasons why.
The first has no interest in anything the second has to say.Did he or did he not promise to slash energy bills by 50%? Does he not understand the impact of data centers? Or did he and just think that most people are too dumb to understand it and made a BS promise anyway....
Ken, the media has skewed this by comparing electricity costs from 2022 to now. The truth is, Trump isn’t responsible for the record hikes that happened under Biden. Once again, the media is recycling old talking points, and some people are just swallowing it whole. The numbers I looked at were from when Joe packed up and left the office; he handed Trump an already inflated figure. Yes, prices have gone up since, but nowhere near as much as they make it sound. Honestly, the chart Willow posted shocked me. Why would someone who supports Joe share such a disastrous set of numbers? It truly got me doing some research. Actually, we are now seeing a flattening, and hopefully we will see a downward turn
Energy prices under Trump have risen versus the Biden administration. There's absolutely no way around that. He promised energy costs would be cut in HALF.
So far he has only making things worse.What is wrong with you? I’ve already mentioned that fact multiple times on this thread and provided statistics to show both the increase and the small amounts involved. You’ve made your point, and I’ve debated it with research and data. At this stage, it seems like you’re just beating a dead horse. I’m still shaking my head over why you even posted that chart. It clearly shows that Biden caused the problem and experienced historic energy costs throughout his term. According to the stats, he hasn’t made things significantly worse, and I’m thankful to see energy costs flattening. Generally, a flattening trend could signal that we might see a downturn soon.
Some Reading Material If You are Interested:
Your electric bill may be paying for big data centers’ energy use
https://www.theinvadingsea.com/2025/07/ … ls-energy/
Florida’s AI Data Center Growth: Residents Shoulder Rising Grid Costs
https://medium.com/@edmondthorne/florid … 2ab8ae06bc
Data Center Developers Eye FPL Rate Case
https://www.flpublicpower.com/news/data … -rate-case
The Power Play: How Data Centers and Utilities Are Reinventing Energy Strategies
https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/ener … strategies
ACCELERATING FEDERAL PERMITTING OF DATA CENTER INFRASTRUCTURE
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential … structure/
An Issue I will be doing more research on, might be a good reason to invest substantially into companies like FPL (NEE) and DUKE (DUK).
I've been sleeping on this matter, clearly it has kicked into high gear in just the past couple of months.Data centers are not new. They didn't just pop up within the last 6 months. Again... Why would Trump promise a reduction in energy bills knowing the impact of these centers? Is he stupid or does he think the American people are stupid?
Ken, He has done so much that it would be hard to keep up. The proof will be in the costs. Truely no way to skew costs, and they are now showing a flattening. This could indicate we may see the prices coming down.
In his second term, Trump has taken a variety of steps to support U.S. energy production and help lower costs. He appointed North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum to lead the National Energy Council, coordinating federal energy policy. Offshore drilling has been expanded through policies like “downhole commingling,” which allows multiple reservoirs to be accessed at higher pressures. The administration has also streamlined permitting for pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastructure and supported refinery construction through loans and incentives. On coal, Executive Order 14261 reclassified coal as a “mineral” to speed up permitting, and the Department of the Interior allocated $130 million through the Abandoned Mine Land Economic Revitalization Program to repurpose legacy coal sites. Additionally, public lands have been leased for drilling, mining, and other energy projects to increase domestic production and support energy independence.
I do feel we will see some results by the end of 2026. I mean, just consider what he came into, and the work it will take to correct such a mess.That's true... they did more damage in four years than any 8 year Presidency had ever done, and it wasn't even close.
From putting us on an irreversible path to WWIII ... to filling the nation up with foreign criminals released from prisons ... to sabotaging business of all sorts here in America... the only thing that explains such malfeasance is that it was being done deliberately to destroy America's future.I think you make a very strong point, and I agree with the idea that the damage done in those four years feels unlike anything we’ve seen before. It wasn’t just poor decision-making here and there; it seemed like a constant stream of choices that weakened us at home and abroad. The foreign policy blunders, the lack of control at the border, and the pressure put on American businesses really did leave us feeling like the future of our country was being deliberately undermined. What troubles me most is how coordinated it all appeared, as if there was a bigger agenda at play rather than just mistakes. It makes me wonder how we can ever truly hold leaders accountable when their actions so clearly go against the best interests of the people.
I think you’re right to point out that the damage wasn’t only in foreign policy or the economy, it was also in how the Biden administration deepened divisions here at home. In my view, Biden went out of his way to pit people against each other, especially along racial lines, instead of working to bring us together. On top of that, he openly applauded values that many of us believe undermine the foundation of society, like pushing gender reassignment, trying to force men into women’s sports and bathrooms, and elevating DEI over merit and fairness. He also turned a blind eye when unrest on campuses left Jewish students in fear for their safety. To call his record full of blunders feels almost too soft; it’s been a historic unraveling of our country’s stability and unity.
But here we are, we made it through. I’m truly grateful that we now have a chance to get back on the right path. It won’t be easy, that much is certain, but I believe we’ve got the right person to lead us forward. In my view, he learned a lot in his first term and had the time to study how to do it right and within the laws this time around. And so far, he’s been rolling over the courts by turning to the highest court in the land, genius, in my opinion. Trump is a fighter, and when he gets knocked down, he gets right back up, spits in their eye, and says, “Is that all you’ve got?” That kind of strength and determination is exactly what we need right now.
I feel like we’re sitting front row to a quiet revolution. I never imagined in my lifetime that I’d witness such a significant, historic moment, but here we are, living through it.The left hates him so much, based on widespread VERY terrible lies.
I'm sorry to tell you that his enemies are fierce, harsh and relentless.
Their hatred is based on satanic delusion. Those that fall into it get high off the hatred.
They should stop it already.
Stop the hate!
Pure and simple.
Unfortunately, HATE is just SO EXCITING!
Kathryn, I completely understand your frustration and share your concern about the relentless attacks. It’s exhausting to watch so much energy poured into spreading lies and hate. But don’t let their negativity pull you down! Focus on what you can control, your own actions, your voice, and your values. Don’t be baited into their world; staying grounded, positive, and committed to truth is far more powerful than any amount of anger or excitement from the other side. Keep your head up; your clarity and steadfastness make a bigger impact than you might realize!
AI...I used Elon's bot, Grok
Have energy costs increase in 2025 under Trump's second term?
"Yes, energy costs, particularly electricity, have increased during Donald Trump's second term in 2025, continuing a trend of rising prices. This has happened despite his campaign promise to cut energy prices. "Who has denied that fact? Why are you so repetitive? I mean, you posted your chart and offered your view. The price of electricity has gone higher during the last 8 months, and Trump claimed he would cut it in half. You left out a bit --- he claimed he would cut it 50% in his first year. You also did not choose to add who was responsible for the outrageous cost that we have been made to pay under Biden for 4 years. You opened the conversation, I added my view, and stats to support my view. Not sure there is much more to debate on the subject. No one has disputed your origin post --- al all. Why do you go on and on?
AGAIN
Energy increased under Biden due to the pandemic... That's a fact. Trump has only furthered those increases. Also a fact.
Trump has another victory in the courts.
Sept 12 -- Last week, a federal appeals court ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing it to revoke humanitarian parole protections for approximately 430,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This decision enables the administration to proceed with deportations of these individuals. The court's ruling overturned a previous lower court decision that had blocked the termination of these protections. The Trump administration argued that the Department of Homeland Security has the authority to end the program without judicial interference. Critics, however, contend that the decision could lead to family separations and returns to dangerous conditions for the affected migrants.
This ruling marks a significant step in the administration's broader immigration policy, which includes efforts to tighten border security and reduce the number of migrants in the United States. While the decision is a legal victory for the Trump administration, its implementation may face further legal challenges and could have substantial humanitarian implications.
In cases like this, the losing side can try to appeal to the full appellate court or even petition the Supreme Court, but the chances of overturning a clear appeals court decision are often slim, especially when the ruling is based on the federal government’s broad authority over immigration.
So practically speaking, unless a higher court steps in or there’s an unexpected legal twist, the Trump administration is likely to be able to move forward with sending these migrants back.
As of now, the federal appeals court ruling allowing the Trump administration to end humanitarian parole protections for approximately 430,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela has not been appealed further. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision on September 12, 2025, and there has been no indication that the ruling will be challenged in a higher court.Big agendas and bold visions—whether in politics or education—need clear planning and execution to work. At Veda Academy we bring the same clarity and structure to learning with step-by-step NCERT Solutions, CBSE guidance and expert exam support so students can achieve their own goals with confidence.
visit us for more info:-https://vedaacademy.in/GOP Senator Eric Schmitt: "How can you ask us to unite? There can be no unity between good and evil. Somebody has to win this thing. And don't tell me it's both sides. It is not organic. This system lurks behind EVERY Radical Leftist movement in our nation today."
https://x.com/theblaze/status/1967979431806579002
Wow... maybe things are worse than I thought.With that attitude there will be no compromise and nothing will happen long term. If changes are made they will be promptly "unmade" with the next election (something we are already seeing).
The only possibility lies in that "Radical leftist movement" - it is faintly possible that other leftist programs are more appealing and might be built into a compromise. I doubt it, though - my experience is that people making that kind of statement will ONLY accept the things they want themselves. ALL others are "radical", whether left or right."If changes are made they will be promptly "unmade" with the next election (something we are already seeing)."
What makes you think we are going to have another Presidential election?
They just need to get WWIII rolling, declare a suspension of elections, like they did in 'Democratic' Ukraine... because, you know, war... wala... no worries, no elections...
At least then all those with TDS can say 'I told you so!'Who is "*they*' ?? Do you not realize that Trump is the president right now? Do you realize that Russia's attacks on Ukraine have drastically increased since this fool took office? But yeah please tell me more about World War III LOL
President Trump's state visit to the UK concluded with a blend of ceremonial grandeur and substantive agreements. The visit was marked by royal pageantry, and the signing of the Tech Prosperity Deal stands out as a significant achievement, potentially reshaping the technological and economic landscape between the two nations.
Tech Prosperity Deal: Historic Deal
President Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a landmark $350 billion agreement aimed at advancing artificial intelligence (AI), civil nuclear energy, and quantum computing. This deal is poised to create approximately 17,500 jobs—15,000 in the UK and 2,500 in the US—and includes the construction of 12 advanced nuclear reactors in northern England. Major tech firms such as Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google are among the investors supporting the initiative. https://nypost.com/2025/09/18/us-news/t … hatgpt.com
More Talk on the Trade deal that was signed in May.
The U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal was announced on May 8, 2025, and signed on June 16, 2025. This agreement aimed to reduce or remove tariffs on each other's exports, including on cars, steel, and aluminum. Private Discussions on Trade and Global Issues
In private talks at Chequers, President Trump and Prime Minister Starmer discussed various topics, including trade relations and international issues. While they reached agreements on certain matters, some issues, such as U.S. tariffs on British steel, remain under negotiation. The leaders also addressed global concerns, including the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, and the UK's plans to recognize a Palestinian state.Gotta give him credit... he seems to be getting the UK and China to play ball...
Might not only turn the American economy around... but avoid WWIII while doing so.But, China, Russia and Iran are pretty chummy.
and what?
"The leaders also addressed global concerns, including ... the UK's plans to recognize a Palestinian state."
ULP!Ken, Absolutely, it does show a lot of faith in the president’s leadership. Getting both the UK and China to cooperate is no small feat. What I appreciate most about Trump currently is that he’s able to continue working on multiple issues without any signs of relenting from his goals. If he can keep diplomacy on track while boosting the economy, it could be a huge win for the country, strengthening our global position and potentially avoiding a much larger conflict. It’s the kind of strategic leadership that can make a real difference. Hey, he is steamrolling.
Trump Administration Cancels Annual Hunger Survey...
Because if you don't acknowledge it it doesn't exist right??
"The Trump administration is canceling an annual government effort to gather data on how many Americans struggle to get enough food.
The data, which is collected each December and analyzed by the U.S. Agriculture Department, measures food insecurity across states and demographic groups.
The decision to discontinue the survey for 2025 was announced in meetings with USDA employees this past week by an administrator for the Economic Research Service, an arm of the Agriculture Department, according to people present at the meetings.
Employees were told that the survey wouldn’t be funded this year by the USDA, according to the people who attended the meetings.
On Saturday, the USDA confirmed that it was canceling the survey.
This nonstatutory report became overly politicized and upon subsequent review, was unnecessary to carry out the work of the Department,” USDA spokesman Alec Varsamis said.
He added that the 2024 report will be released on Oct. 22, but the 2025 report has been discontinued."
https://www.wsj.com/economy/trump-admin … y-ca3d3793Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Third Quarter 2025 Survey of Professional Forecasters
Forecasters See Higher Growth in 2025
The near-term outlook for growth in the U.S. economy looks better now than it did three months ago, according to 36 forecasters surveyed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The forecasters expect real GDP to grow at an annual rate of 1.3 percent this quarter, up from the previous estimate of 0.9 percent. On an annual-average over annual-average basis, the forecasters expect real GDP to increase 1.7 percent in 2025, up 0.3 percentage point from the estimate in the survey of three months ago.
A slight downward revision to the path for the unemployment rate accompanies the outlook for growth. The unemployment rate is projected to be an annual average of 4.2 percent in 2025 and 4.5 percent in 2026 before falling to 4.4 percent in 2027, and 4.3 percent in 2028. In the previous survey, the unemployment rate was forecast to rise from 4.3 percent to 4.4 percent over the same four-year period.
On the employment front, the forecasters predict job gains in the current quarter at a rate of 73,000 per month. The employment projections for both the current quarter and the following three quarters show downward revisions from those of the previous survey. The projections for the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment suggest job gains at a monthly rate of 132,800 in 2025, down from the previous estimate of 140,900. (These annual-average projections are computed as the year-to-year change in the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment, converted to a monthly rate.)
To read more
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/surveys … hatgpt.comANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST! All in a day's work---
The Dominican Republic has indicated that a boat targeted by a U.S. airstrike had been ferrying "approximately 1,000 kilograms of suspected cocaine."
That figure converts to more than 2,200 pounds, which is more than one ton of the drug.
The Dominican Republic indicated that its National Drug Control Directorate and its navy seized hundreds of packages of the drug following the American attack against the vessel. "The packages were sent, under chain of custody, to the National Institute of Forensic Sciences (INACIF) to determine their exact type and weight," the country noted.
"Dominican authorities, in close coordination with the United States Southern Command (Southcom) and the Joint Interagency Task Force South (JIATF-South), detected a speedboat (Go Fast type), which according to intelligence reports was loaded with narcotics and was heading to Dominican territory, with the intention of using the country as a bridge to take it to the United States," the National Drug Control Directorate news release states.
This marked the first "joint operation against narcoterrorism in the Caribbean region" executed between the Dominican Republic and the U.S., according to the release about the effort.
President Donald Trump has ordered strikes on several boats this month as he seeks to crackdown on drug trafficking to the U.S.
"IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!" the commander in chief warned last week in a Truth Social post about one of the strikes.
A U.S. government fact sheet about cocaine describes the substance as "an intense, euphoria-producing stimulant drug with strong addictive potential" and notes that "Tolerance to cocaine’s effects develops rapidly, causing users to take higher and higher doses.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/drug-smug … ublic-saysWhat efforts is this administration putting forth to support/ expand substance abuse programs?
While blowing up boats May fit into the "warrior ethos". I'm not sure it does much at all to address the root causes of addiction.... Which Americans struggle with mightily.Guess cutting down the supply isn’t good enough, huh? Gosh, your guy did nothing but let the good times roll. I’ll let you head over to Google U and look up, “What efforts is this administration putting forth to support or expand substance abuse programs?” Maybe you’ll stumble across something Biden actually did nothing to stop drugs from pouring in, as well as migrants. I really do appreciate a president who works to solve problems, not create them. A man who is working so hard to make a difference. A man who is bringing back a stagnant nation. I could not be prouder or more pleased to see Trump keeping promises.
But hey, maybe we’ll just leave “getting to the root of the problem” to the Democrats. Funny… it seems they haven’t gotten around to that yet. LOLDo you believe that cutting the supply addresses addiction?? Blowing up a couple of boats is akin to to trying to catch a deluge in a cup.... Those who supply the drugs will just pivot as long as there is demand.... There's a lot of demand for drugs by Americans.
Has the Trump Administration cut funding for addiction services??As long As Americans want illicit drugs, they will find ways to get them... If your typical drug addicted American can't get his fentanyl or whatever his drug of choice may be.. he'll pivot to maybe cooking meth out of his basement. Or maybe he'll mix up a concoction from ingredients purchased from the grocery store. Or maybe he'll huff freon he steals from the neighbors AC unit .... You don't need to launch a war if you address the addicted. Supply will never be cut off...it's infinite.
Not a smart idea of this Administration to cut money that aids addiction programs
How does cutting down the supply address the problem of addiction?
Trump keeping promises --- Make America Healthy Again
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a … hatgpt.com
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today initiated the process for a label change for acetaminophen (Tylenol and similar products) to reflect evidence suggesting that the use of acetaminophen by pregnant women may be associated with an increased risk of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD in children. The agency also issued a related letter alerting physicians nationwide.
“The FDA is taking action to make parents and doctors aware of a considerable body of evidence about potential risks associated with acetaminophen,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “Even with this body of evidence, the choice still belongs with parents. The precautionary principle may lead many to avoid using acetaminophen during pregnancy, especially since most low-grade fevers don’t require treatment. It remains reasonable, however, for pregnant women to use acetaminophen in certain scenarios.”
Evidence in recent years has suggested a correlation between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and subsequent diagnosis of conditions like autism and ADHD. Multiple large-scale cohort studies, including the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Boston Birth Cohort, find this association. Some studies have described that the risk may be most pronounced when acetaminophen is taken chronically throughout pregnancy.
It is important to note that while an association between acetaminophen and neurological conditions has been described in many studies, a causal relationship has not been established, and there are contrary studies in the scientific literature. It is also noted that acetaminophen is the only over-the-counter drug approved for use to treat fevers during pregnancy, and high fevers in pregnant women can pose a risk to their children. Additionally, aspirin and ibuprofen have well-documented adverse impacts on the fetus.The biggest, most robust, comprehensive and up-to-date study...
Study reveals no causal link between neurodevelopmental disorders and acetaminophen exposure before birth | National Institutes of Health (NIH) https://share.google/MFZVfoLwBDBlX2P9G
Why is Bobby doing this???"Study reveals no causal link between neurodevelopmental disorders and acetaminophen exposure before birth | National Institutes of Health (NIH) https://share.google/MFZVfoLwBDBlX2P9G
Why is Bobby doing this???" Willow
I’m not really sure why you’d ask me, “Why is Bobby doing this?” That feels like an odd question, and I’m just not the type of woman who’s going to assume something I honestly have no idea about. Making assumptions like that only leads to misunderstandings, and it can twist someone’s motives into something they never intended. To me, it’s better to admit when we don’t know than to risk spreading half-truths or unfair judgments.They have a political agenda when they go for those kind of reprints. The actual results were this: In total, 185 909 children (7.49%) were exposed to acetaminophen during pregnancy. Crude absolute risks at 10 years of age for those not exposed vs those exposed to acetaminophen were 1.33% vs 1.53% for autism, 2.46% vs 2.87% for ADHD, and 0.70% vs 0.82% for intellectual disability. In models without sibling control, ever-use vs no use of acetaminophen during pregnancy was associated with marginally increased risk of autism (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.08]; risk difference [RD] at 10 years of age, 0.09% [95% CI, -0.01% to 0.20%]), ADHD (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05-1.10]; RD, 0.21% [95% CI, 0.08%-0.34%]), and intellectual disability (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]; RD, 0.04% [95% CI, -0.04% to 0.12%]). To address unobserved confounding, matched full sibling pairs were also analyzed. Sibling control analyses found no evidence that acetaminophen use during pregnancy was associated with autism (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.04]; RD, 0.02% [95% CI, -0.14% to 0.18%]), ADHD (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.94-1.02]; RD, -0.02% [95% CI, -0.21% to 0.15%]), or intellectual disability (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92-1.10]; RD, 0% [95% CI, -0.10% to 0.13%]). Similarly, there was no evidence of a dose-response pattern in sibling control analyses. For example, for autism, compared with no use of acetaminophen, persons with low (<25th percentile), medium (25th-75th percentile), and high (>75th percentile) mean daily acetaminophen use had HRs of 0.85, 0.96, and 0.88, respectively.
So it is not clear at all. I happen to disagree but only an anti-Trumper is going to go out and take tylenol when pregnant since they think tylenol might be involved in autism.
If any of those libs who are taking megadoses of tylenol to oppose Trump had done any reading, they would have realize that the drug has many other side effects.
Why she and other libs are so angry about this I have no idea. Probably just because it is coming from Trump.Doc, You’re right that the results of the study aren’t clear-cut, and even the researchers themselves found no strong evidence of a causal link once sibling controls were factored in. But what stands out to me is that Tylenol, especially during pregnancy, has always been recommended with caution and sparingly. It’s not something to casually take in large amounts, and certainly not something to use as a political statement. The risks may be small statistically, but they’re not zero, and beyond autism or ADHD, high doses can cause liver damage and other serious complications for both mother and child.
I think it would be wise just not to take it. After all, it’s only nine months out of one’s life. Too often, when we see medications flagged as potentially problematic, we brush off the warnings, and then five years down the road, boom, it turns out they were harmful after all. And now we’re seeing pregnant women on TikTok dancing around while taking Tylenol. Honestly, is this not just plain stupid?
That’s why I find it irresponsible when people try to politicize medication use. If someone is really taking large quantities of Tylenol just to oppose Trump, that’s not only irrational, it’s dangerous to their own health. To me, this shows how extreme the rhetoric has gotten; people are willing to risk themselves just to make a point, rather than look at the bigger picture with some common sense.It is plain stupid. You are right there are so many alternatives that no woman HAS to take this drug during pregnancy, so if there is any doubt why not just avoid it? I am sure you have seen cases of tylenol toxicity where the effects do not show up until much later, and that is what those people can look forward to. Why they want to politicize this is beyond me.
It reminds me of them complaining about the artificial dyes. If it were a liberal doing that they would be all for it.Exactly. Why take the risk at all when there are safe alternatives? Tylenol might seem harmless, but long-term or high-dose use can quietly damage the liver or kidneys, and the effects often don’t show up until years later. Death from kidney or liver disease can only be described as painful, ugly, and cruel. It’s baffling that some people politicize something that should be common-sense caution. If a liberal warned against it, I have no doubt the reaction would be completely different.
Winning Where It Counts!
Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who sent anti-Trump texts, loses First Amendment case over his firing
A federal judge dismissed a long-running lawsuit from Strzok, who was fired from the FBI during Trump's first term.
Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who sent anti-Trump texts, loses First Amendment case over his firing--- federal judge dismissed a long-running lawsuit from Strzok, who was fired from the FBI during Trump's first term.
Peter Strzok holds his glasses while sitting in front of a microphone.
A judge has dismissed claims from former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strok, shown at a 2018 House hearing, that his firing from the FBI violated his First Amendment rights.
By Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney
09/23/2025 04:33 PM EDT
"Former FBI agent Peter Strzok has lost a long-running lawsuit claiming he was illegally fired during Donald Trump’s first term after sending text messages that criticized Trump.
Strzok argued in the lawsuit that his FBI bosses had retaliated against him in order to placate Trump, who was outraged over texts that Strzok exchanged while investigating ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.
In a ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson said that, after several years gathering evidence and testimony from those involved in the 2018 decision to terminate the veteran counterintelligence agent, Strzok’s lawyers had FAILED to show that his dismissal violated his First Amendment rights.
Jackson, an Obama appointee, stressed that she was not ruling on whether Strzok’s firing “was the appropriate sanction” for his conduct, only that the voluminous evidence assembled over years of litigation — including a deposition of Trump himself — had not proven Strzok’s rights were violated.
Jackson’s full ruling is under seal, for now. But she disclosed a summary Tuesday that showed she also rejected Strzok’s argument that he had struck a binding deal with a top FBI disciplinary official under which Strzok would have been demoted and suspended for 60 days. The FBI’s deputy director at the time, David Bowdich, nixed that arrangement and fired Strzok.
Strzok, who worked as an agent for the FBI for 22 years before his firing, can appeal Jackson’s decision to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. His attorney, Aitan Goelman, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling ends one chapter in one of the lengthiest legal sagas stemming from Trump’s first term, when he grew increasingly furious over the criminal and counterintelligence probes of his 2016 campaign’s contacts with Russia. The discovery of the anti-Trump text messages — including one in which Strzok suggested the FBI might “stop” Trump from becoming president — helped Trump cast those probes as a corrupt “witch hunt” and embroil the bureau in years of controversy.
The imbroglio became tabloid fodder, as well, after it was revealed that Strzok and the FBI lawyer with whom he exchanged many of the texts, Lisa Page, were having an affair at the time. Trump seized on that aspect of the story and mounted numerous attacks on Strzok and Page on social media and in public, sometimes disparaging Page in crude terms.
Strzok has long denied that his personal views about Trump influenced his actions on the job, and a lengthy inspector general review found no evidence that the Russia probe was affected by bias. But the saga helped Trump rally his supporters and regain his footing after a rocky start to his presidency."
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/2 … d-00577209Treasury’s Bessent warns NYC: No bailout under Mamdani – ‘drop dead’
Mamdani has placed affordability at the forefront of his campaign to helm America’s largest city--- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned on Wednesday that if Zohran Mamdani carries out his socialist economic plans as mayor, New York City will come begging Washington for a bailout – and he won’t give them one.
'"I guarantee you, and there're not a lot of things in life that are sure, but New York City will be coming to the federal government for a bailout if Mamdani’s plans are implemented," Bessent told FOX Business' Maria Bartiromo."
"It will be the same thing that Gerald Ford said. Drop dead," Bessent said during his interview on "Mornings with Maria."
Bessent, a Wall Street veteran, doubled down on his warning, saying: "You can’t enact policies like this and expect to be bailed out."
Bessent added that New York risks losing its tax base if Mamdani’s plans take effect: "All the high earners, all the businesses. If you look back over the past five years, we’ve already seen the greatest transfer of wealth in U.S. history from Manhattan County to Palm Beach County." Fox news
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tr … -drop-deadMore of Trump's BS agenda..
Brooke Rollins: "Soybean, corn, wheat, sorghum, cotton farmers are facing very difficult times. We are currently in conversations here at the White House, across the government, on a farmer aid package."
MORE handouts to farmers? They voted for this... I don't care if every one of them loses their freaking farms....We are bailing out farmers because of Trump's inane tariff policies. So we pay twice. ...for the tariffs and for the government bailout they create. No, let these people reap what they've sown.Actually, that perspective misses the bigger picture. These farmers aren’t getting “handouts” because they voted a certain way, they’re being protected from deliberate economic attacks. Trump’s tariffs weren’t randomly imposed; they were a strategic move to push back against unfair trade practices and bring foreign countries to the negotiating table. When other nations retaliated with tariffs on U.S. crops, American farmers were caught in the crossfire.
Supporting a farmer aid package in this context isn’t about rewarding votes or pampering failure; it’s about shielding hardworking Americans from economic harm caused by global trade wars that were necessary to defend U.S. interests. Letting them “reap what they’ve sown” would actually punish people for circumstances beyond their control. Smart leadership is about strategy, not cruelty, and Trump’s administration understood that.
Some on the left, as you have, resort to harsh words.Harsh words? Really?
This is a trade war that Trump has purposely chosen to open up...AGAIN.
And the majority of us are sick and tired of our tax dollars paying for it....sorry, farmers knew he did this once and would do it again and they voted for him in large numbers... They should face the consequences, I don't care if every last one of them loses their farm. This was completely in their control... If we can't afford healthcare in this country... We sure as hell can't afford welfare for farmers"And the majority of us are sick and tired of our tax dollars paying for it....sorry, farmers knew he did this once and would do it again and they voted for him in large numbers" Willow
You're sick of your tax dollars being used to help America's farming industry? Have you taken a look at what the Democrats support funding? We need farmers, period.The Democrats support the funding of the ACA
.. and trump? He supports funding Argentina...
The US went from a $12B soybean market to zero.
Trump made a deal to bail out Argentina and what do they do? Turn around, stab America in the back by selling soybeans to China....You’ve really stepped into territory you don’t understand here. You picked up a subject without digging in, and it shows. A $20 billion swap line isn’t a handout to Argentina, it’s a safeguard for the U.S. and the global economy. What it does is give Argentina temporary access to dollars, backed by their own pesos, so their currency doesn’t collapse and their IMF debt doesn’t spin into default. Since the U.S. is the largest IMF contributor, we’d be directly on the hook if Argentina implodes.
The bigger picture is even more critical. Argentina is Latin America’s third-largest economy, and its financial health affects far more than its own citizens. If their system goes down, the ripple effect hits international banks, emerging markets, and even U.S. retirement accounts. Global confidence in markets can turn on a dime, and preventing that spiral before it starts is far cheaper than cleaning up after the crash.
Supporting Milei’s reforms is also a long-term win. For decades, Argentina’s SOCIALIST policies produced corruption, high inflation, and instability. Now you have a leader trying to restore free-market principles, and the U.S. stepping in to keep his agenda afloat ensures a more reliable partner in trade, energy, and security. Letting him fail would mean opening the door wide for China and Russia to buy influence in our own hemisphere.
And for those who claim this hurts American farmers, the opposite is true. If Argentina’s peso collapsed, their exports, soybeans, beef, wheat, would flood global markets at bargain prices. That kind of undercutting would be devastating for U.S. agriculture. By holding the peso steady, we’re actually protecting our farmers from that outcome.
This is why I welcome Trump’s move here. It’s a preemptive strike against a global financial crisis that could have echoed across the world economy. It protects U.S. investments, shields American farmers, keeps authoritarian powers in check, and strengthens a reformer finally trying to fix Argentina’s broken system. It’s not a giveaway, it’s a strategic move to defend U.S. prosperity and global stability before things spin out of control.
Why do you grab blurbs and never look at the whys of it? One can't be fully informed by grasping at media blurbs.Sorry. Not interested in propping up Trump's corrupt buddy...
You would think Trump would demand Argentina buy our soybeans as a condition of this loan.....nah. too much "common sense" LOL...Trump is majorly screwing our farmers in every way. They got what they voted for.
Now, he is bailing out Argentina who are selling their crops to China. This is making matters worse. No market even in the future.
Why is Trump bailing out Argentina when he can't help Americans with health-care??
The MAGA philosophy is so infallible, Americans apparently have to send a $20 billion bailout to a country on the verge of socioeconomic collapse after less than two years of leadership from a Trump ally...Make Argentina Great Again!!oh it’s a "currency swap” yeah....
It’s a currency swap for $20 BILLION with a country that’s defaulted at least 9 times and most recently less than 5 years ago and then again just 2 years before that.
It’s risky and stupid to bailout Argentina and it’s only going to cost the U.S. more in the long run.
AND we have to Bail out US farmers... China is buying Argentina’s bargain basement soybeans while U.S. farmers can’t sell and lose their entire livelihoods. That’s not “America First” at all.
Does this regime really think all Americans are that stupid???LET ME POINT OUT THE RUDE CONDESCENDING COMMENT ONCE AGAIN BECAUSE I DID DO IT PREVIOUSLY BUT HERE WE GO AGAIN...
"You’ve really stepped into territory you don’t understand here. You picked up a subject without digging in, and it shows.""You’ve really stepped into territory you don’t understand here. You picked up a subject without digging in, and it shows." Shar
This wasn’t meant to be rude; it was more meant as a critique. However, I will openly apologize for offending you.If you do not respect a poster... or do not believe their opinions/posts are merited in facts ... or do not believe they respect you or your positions/opinions... why are you engaging them?
Why are you even reading their posts?
Just scroll on by...
(Don't read)
Just scroll on by...
(Don't read)
Until there is someone else's post you want to respond to...One need not agree with a post to remain respectful. The maga folks here show little ability to do so. Not surprising when Trump is the example...
I understand your question, and it’s fair. My reasoning is that in the past, I’ve been able to form worthwhile connections by hanging in and working through disagreements. Sometimes that meant pointing out what I felt was getting in the way of a good conversation. But I’ll admit, with the division we’re seeing today, that approach doesn’t seem to work as well anymore.
I will most assuredly take your advice.
Trump has ordered Republicans in the House to shut the government down unless they can jam parts of Trump's Project 2025 agenda down the throats of the American people.... He is boycotting budget talks, pushing for a shutdown.
Trump is directing federal agencies to prepare for mass firings if there's a government shutdown.
All the while costs for everyday life are just going up...
Gee, I hope we can keep the sanitation and landscaping we're paying the guard over a million dollars a day to do.... It's being reported that most of the petunias planted died.... Apparently not planted properly, who would have thought LOLOh, I see what you’re missing here — Trump plays 4D chess while the left is still fumbling with checkers. He forces Democrats to show their hand every time. Farmers? He made sure they got the safety net instead of China eating our lunch. A shutdown? He’s making the swamp panic because he knows the waste is buried in those budgets. And meanwhile, you’re worried about petunias? That’s rich. Trump’s strategy isn’t “BS,” it’s leverage, and judging by how rattled the left gets, it’s working beautifully.
I'm not worried about petunias... Trump is the one who ordered those to be planted at the cost of over a million dollars a day by our National Guard in Washington DC and I guess soon to be in Memphis...
As far as the farmers go, they made their bed so let them lie in it.... I would venture to say that a good number of Americans are sick of bailing out the freaking farmers who vote for this shit every time...
Buried waste in the budget? Getting rid of the ACA tax credits is waste? Again, what will be the consequences of millions losing healthcare? Spoiler alert it's going to hurt everyone, even the ones who have insurance.
NEVER FORGET
His words. And Trump refuses to meet with Democrats today. He wants a shutdown...Trump refuses to hold himself accountable for anything."Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced negotiations for a $20 billion currency swap line, potential bond purchases, and standby credit to stabilize Argentina's peso following midterm election losses that led to market declines. The support, endorsed by President Donald Trump after a meeting with President Javier Milei at Mar-a-Lago, addresses Argentina's $44 billion IMF debt challenges and aims to bolster Milei's free-market reforms. The announcement has drawn U.S. criticism from farmers concerned about prioritizing foreign aid over domestic issues like tariff-affected agriculture...."
What are farmers saying? "America First my ass...". But I say they should have known better....You’re completely over your head on this one. You grabbed a subject you clearly know little about, and didn’t even bother to do a bit of research to see what this issue is truly about. Critics latch onto the “$20 billion” figure and frame it as another foreign giveaway. But that’s misleading. A currency swap line isn’t a cash gift, it’s essentially a credit arrangement that gives Argentina short-term access to U.S. dollars while pledging pesos in return. It’s designed to stabilize their currency, keep them from collapsing, and ensure they can pay international debts—debts owed in large part to the IMF, where the U.S. is the largest stakeholder. So the U.S. has a direct financial interest in making sure Argentina doesn’t default.
By backing Milei, the U.S. is supporting a leader who is openly pursuing free-market reforms, a stark contrast to Argentina’s history of socialist mismanagement and hyperinflation. Stabilizing his reform agenda strengthens a key South American partner, which means a more reliable ally for U.S. trade, energy, and security interests in the region. If Argentina collapses financially, China and Russia would be waiting at the door with cheap loans and influence, undermining U.S. strategic interests in our own hemisphere.
This isn’t just about Argentina, it’s about global financial stability. If Argentina defaults or sees its peso spiral further, it creates ripple effects in emerging markets across Latin America, where U.S. banks and businesses are heavily exposed. By acting early, the Treasury reduces the risk of a broader financial crisis that would hurt American investors, corporations, and ultimately taxpayers far more than a swap line ever would.
To address the criticism from U.S. farmers: yes, they are under strain from tariffs and global competition. But this move isn’t charity at their expense. If Argentina’s peso collapses, their agricultural exports (especially soy and beef) flood global markets at rock-bottom prices, crushing U.S. farmers even more. Stabilizing Argentina prevents that “dumping effect” and protects American agriculture in the long run.
I am so pleased to see Trump preventing what could have become a huge problem that would echo throughout the world economy. This wasn’t about giving Argentina a handout. It was about protecting U.S. financial exposure, keeping China and Russia from gaining ground, ensuring global stability, and safeguarding American industries like farming from a distorted global market. It was a strategic investment in U.S. security and prosperity.
There was another significant aspect to this issue."You’re completely over your head on this one. You grabbed a subject you clearly know little about, and didn’t even bother to do a bit of research to see what this issue is truly about."
Excuse me? I'm getting really tired of these jabs that go to intelligence on here.... Are you questioning my intelligence? Are you saying I'm lacking the mental ability to understand this issue? Because it sure does read that way.... I clearly don't know anything about the issue? How do you know that? That's quite an accusation
This read a lot like a personal attack....
An AI generated response and I'm "over my head"?
OKAY
Argentina gutted its social programs, embraced full-blown libertarian Muskonomics, and handed the keys to a man who gifted Elon Musk a chainsaw on camera...
A year year later? Their economy’s in flames, poverty’s exploding and now we’re bailing them out with U.S. taxpayer funds....OH HELL NO
No consideration for Americans healthcare but billions to Argentina....
Nah. That's bullshit. What is “America first” about using the US treasury to bail out the stock market of Argentina?Imagine if Hunter Biden used the White House to sell merchandise like Trump’s granddaughter is doing.
LMFAO USING THE WHITE HOUSE TO SELL SHIT
Right on brand for the trumps.
First, OMH SO Beautiful--- Wow, got a business head too... And selling "shit" legally. Very refreshing to see.
Relate it back to all of the comments about Hunter....
Lol... The outrage about Hunter but this one can hawk shit on the White House lawn... The hypocrisy is glaring the double standard unbelievable... Laughable really
Rude and condescending. Don't presume to know what I understand.
I am going to call these out as I see them... I'm actually really tired of it.John Thune: "We've got a big harvest coming in here in South Dakota, corn and soybeans, and no place to go with it.”
BOO FREAKIN HOO
Geez… last year they had a market for their crop. What, praytell, could possibly have changed?
I've got an idea where you can stick it Thune....
Maybe roll back the tariffs? Maybe not provide a bailout to Argentina?
Hopefully not a penny is given to farmers....
Beware maga followers.... If you come out and support farmer's now and then Trump decides NOT to bail them out... That's going to be a major pretzel for ya!Can someone explain to me why we can send $20 billion to Argentina, but we can’t make healthcare more affordable here at home?
OH HELL NO...
"Top Republican Admits Farmers Need Saving From Trump’s Tariffs
Senate Majority Leader John Thune revealed the plan to bail out struggling farmers...."
NOPE... They voted for this man. They voted for the tariffs and they should relish every second of the consequences... No handouts. No welfare for the farmers. If they're struggling they should pull themselves up by their own damn boot straps... Find another line of work. Stop whining. Sit back and enjoy what you voted for..
THESE PEOPLE DON'T NEED "SAVING"
THEY WANTED THISHere’s your reminder...in his own words...that Trump and Republicans are to blame....
THIS IS GOLD
https://x.com/senecaprojectus/status/19 … 5501664528Fox News article ---The Supreme Court is set to reexamine a landmark decision about the president’s ability to fire members of independent agencies, and the outcome could expand executive power and have far-reaching implications.
The high court revealed in an order last week it would revisit Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, a 1935 decision that Hans von Spakovsky, a legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said is now on "life support."
Contrary to the decision in Humphrey’s, von Spakovsky said agencies like the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various labor boards ought not to be insulated from presidential firings.
"The Constitution says the president is the head of the executive branch," von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital. "That means, just like the CEO of a big corporation, they get to supervise and run the entire corporation, or in this case, the entire executive branch, and you can't have Congress taking parts of that away from him and saying, ‘Well, they’re going to keep doing executive branch things, including law enforcement, but you won’t have any control over them.’"
The Supreme Court’s decision came in response to a challenge from a Biden-appointed FTC commissioner whom President Donald Trump fired at will after taking office.
The high court said in a 6-3 emergency decision Trump’s termination of the commissioner, Rebecca Slaughter, could remain in place for now while it uses her case to take on Humphrey’s Executor, which centered on an FTC firing under President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The high court found Roosevelt could not fire a commissioner without cause.
Slaughter has called her firing illegal, pointing to Humphrey’s and the FTC Act, which says commissioners cannot be fired from their seven-year terms without cause such as malfeasance or negligence.
Joshua Blackman, a professor at South Texas College of Law, told Fox News Digital that if Humphrey’s is overturned or narrowed, it will likely also apply to other agencies that have statutory protections against firings designed to preserve their independence.
"I think this ruling will necessarily reach beyond the FTC," Blackman said. "The only question is whether they maintain that the Federal Reserve is different."
The high court indicated in an earlier shadow docket decision about labor board firings this year that it views the Federal Reserve as unique, a ‘quasi-private’ structure rooted in the traditions of the first central banks. A separate case involving Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's firing is testing that position.
Von Spakovsky said the Supreme Court has been inching toward addressing Humphrey’s. The 2010 decision to narrow the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by stripping independence from an accounting oversight board and the decision five years ago finding the president could fire the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director at will were hints of this.
In the latter case, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the president’s power "to remove — and thus supervise — those who wield executive power on his behalf follows from the text of Article II." The CFPB’s "novel" structure defied that presidential power because a single director oversees an agency that "wield[s] significant executive power."
Ruling in Trump's favor would help the president and his conservative allies realize their stated goal of achieving a unitary executive, a theory that says the president should have sole control over the executive branch.
As part of this vision, Trump abruptly sidestepped numerous statutes to pluck out protected appointees at independent agencies when he took office, moves the Supreme Court is now poised to weigh in on in Slaughter's case.
Boston University School of Law professor Jed Shugerman said in a statement online that Trump has done "more to establish a unitary executive than all the judges and legal scholars in the world could ever do."
However, Shugerman criticized the president, saying his tests of authority have also "done more to discredit and expose the unitary executive theory as lawless authoritarianism than any judge or legal scholar could ever do."
John Shu, a constitutional law expert who served in both Bush administrations, recently told Fox News Digital he believed the Supreme Court would narrow Humphrey’s Executor because the FTC’s powers have greatly expanded since its inception.
"The Federal Trade Commission of 1935 is a lot different than the Federal Trade Commission today," Shu said.
Shu said today’s FTC can open investigations, issue subpoenas, bring lawsuits, impose financial penalties and more. The FTC now has executive, quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions, he said."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/suprem … tive-state
IN MY VIEW, Trump has a real chance of winning this case because the Supreme Court has already shown signs of moving in his direction. They allowed his firing of the FTC commissioner to stand for now, which tells me they’re open to rethinking Humphrey’s Executor. On top of that, the unitary executive theory is gaining momentum, and past rulings like Seila Law have already chipped away at these so-called protections for independent agencies. To me, it only makes sense that a president should have full authority over the executive branch, just like a CEO runs a company. The truth is, these agencies today wield far more power than they did in 1935; they investigate, prosecute, regulate, and even hand down penalties. That’s not some small “independent” role anymore; that’s real executive power. I believe the Court sees this, and it’s why I think Trump stands a strong chance of winning and restoring a level of accountability to agencies that have operated for too long without direct oversight.
Fingers crossed-----Oh yes, fingers crossed to give and addled fascist more power...lol WHAT COULD GO WRONG
Any position that wields executive power MUST be AT THE WILL of the President.
If the President feels a Biden appointee has been placed there to slow, or derail, his every effort... as was done in Trump's 1st term, where they had the Obama led "Resistance"... remember that?
Report: Obama Spearheading the Anti-Trump Resistance
https://www.uspresidentialelectionnews. … esistance/
Resistance from within: Federal workers push back against Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics … story.html
And Obama is still at it today:
Obama Calls for Mass Resistance Against Trump’s Agenda - 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GBx-Xj1z2U&t=1s
It is obvious that it is NECESSARY that the President be able to appoint and fire those who are executing powers of the EO... at will.
Otherwise... you have an illegal and illegitimate "resistance to the authority of the President of the United States"... and clearly something NOT supported in the Constitution.Ken, Hey, in my view, Obama planted the ugly root that’s grown into what we’re dealing with today. Thank God for Roundup.
I completely agree. Any position that exercises executive power exists precisely to carry out the President’s agenda. If a President perceives that an appointee is actively working to obstruct or slow down policies—as we clearly saw during Trump’s first term with the Obama-led “Resistance”—then it is absolutely necessary for the President to have full authority to remove that person. Without that ability, you essentially create a shadow government that can defy the will of the elected leader, which directly undermines the Constitution’s separation of powers. Executive authority only works when the President can ensure that those executing their orders are loyal to the office and the Constitution, not an outside political agenda.
I’m really keeping an eye on the Supreme Court because they’re set to hear a huge case this December that could totally change a president’s power to fire officials at independent federal agencies. Depending on how the Court rules, it could seriously shake up the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress.
MEANWHILE, the Court has already let Trump go ahead and fire FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, even though lower courts had ruled she should be reinstated. That move kind of shows the Court might be ready to rethink these long-standing rules about agency independence.
Honestly, whatever comes out of this case is going to have huge effects on how agencies like the FTC, the Federal Reserve, and others operate. It could give the president a lot more control over them, and that’s definitely something everyone’s going to be watching closely.
Trump is using the courts pretty dam well to push needed change, as well as aid him in keeping to his agenda. Hey, so much going on, almost missed these wins---
Supreme Court Rulings
Withholding Foreign Aid
On September 26, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing it to withhold nearly $5 billion in foreign aid. The Court stayed a lower court's order requiring the funds to be disbursed by the end of the fiscal year, citing concerns over the separation of powers.
DHS Immigration Enforcement
Earlier in September, the Court sided with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in a 6-3 decision, permitting the continuation of immigration sweeps in Southern California that a lower court had previously blocked.
YouTube: today, YouTube agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over his account suspension following the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The settlement includes $22 million allocated to the Trust for the National Mall to fund the construction of a White House State Ballroom. The remaining funds will be distributed to other plaintiffs, including the American Conservative Union.Every single day, Trump makes it clear that he views the government as his personal fiefdom, with money and policies doled out as favors or punishments, with no regard at all to his constitutional obligations. It's pure authoritarianism.
He really does think his followers are stupid...
Trump is claiming Democrats want a shutdown so undocumented immigrants get free health insurance. THAT IS A LIE. HE IS A LYING LIAR WHO LIES INCESSANTLY...
Federal law excludes undocumented immigrants from Medicaid..."Illegal immigrants" are NOT eligible for federal health care. Undocumented immigrants do NOT receive federal health care.Our broken healthcare system is about to get a whole lot worse and more expensive unless Republicans agree to roll back their massive cuts to Medicaid and restore ACA subsidies....
Meanwhile, Trump is posting conspiracy theories about magical hospital beds on Truth Social.
Who's gotten their med bed card??LOLFresh tariffs on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities recently announced by Trump on social media could cause already high prices to rise even further, and deter some Americans from embarking on home renovation projects.....
OH WELL.... TELL US HOW THIS IS GOOD FOR US MAGA...DUMBASSES AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was pictured reading a text from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins:
“Argentina sold a large amount of soybeans to China when we would normally be selling to them... This gives China more leverage over us”
MY GOD...
Let's get this straight...Trump starts a trade war that locks farmers out of their biggest market , then gives a $20 billion bailout to the exact country that's stealing their business???
OH YES
Master negotiator, folks. You're literally funding your own failure....Making America Rich Again---
As of late September 2025, the U.S. has collected approximately $213.3 billion in tariff revenues since President Trump took office in January 2025. This figure includes a record-setting $31.4 billion in August alone, marking the highest monthly total for the year
The money collected from tariffs goes directly to the U.S. Treasury as federal revenue. It’s not earmarked for any specific program unless Congress decides to allocate it in the budget. So essentially:
Federal Revenue: Tariff money adds to the overall pool of funds the government can use for discretionary spending, debt repayment, or other federal priorities.
General Budget: It can help fund things like the military, infrastructure, Social Security, and other federal programs.
Since President Trump took office in January 2025, the U.S. has collected roughly $213 billion in tariff revenue, with a record $31.4 billion coming in just August alone. These tariffs cover a wide range of products, from pharmaceuticals to heavy-duty trucks and furniture, with rates sometimes reaching up to 100% on certain items. This is HISTORICALLY UNPRECEDENTED —even during the first Trump administration’s tariff war in 2018–2019, annual tariff collections peaked around $70–80 billion, so having over $200 billion in less than a year is extraordinary.
All of this money goes directly into the U.S. Treasury, becoming part of federal revenue that can be used for discretionary spending, debt repayment, or other government priorities. It’s not earmarked for any specific program unless Congress decides to allocate it, so it adds to the overall pool of funds the government manages, similar to income or corporate tax revenue.
While the Treasury often holds large balances for daily operations, the sheer scale of tariff revenue in 2025 is far above what’s typical, making it one of the LARGEST sums collected from trade duties in modern U.S. HISTORY.
If this money just sits in the Treasury, it doesn’t go unused; it earns interest and is available to fund federal programs, pay down debt, or support future government spending, depending on the federal budget and decisions by Congress and the President.Yeah.... Money that came right out of Americans pockets. Americans who are struggling with the increasing costs of literally everything we touch. This is insulting. Especially when millions of Americans are about to lose health insurance... A real joke. Trump is an addled incompetent hateful fool
A Vision for Peace
The implementation of this 20-point plan represents a historic opportunity to end decades of conflict and suffering. By addressing the immediate humanitarian needs, ensuring the release of hostages and prisoners, and laying the groundwork for economic development and political reform, the plan offers a comprehensive approach to peace. The establishment of a neutral, technocratic governance structure aims to create a stable and secure environment for all residents of Gaza. If accepted and successfully implemented, this plan could mark the beginning of a new era of peace and prosperity in the region, providing hope for future generations.
While the plan's success hinges on Hamas's acceptance, the broad support it has garnered from Israel and key international actors underscores its potential as a transformative framework for peace. As negotiations continue, there is cautious optimism that this comprehensive approach can pave the way for a lasting resolution to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Full Summary of Trump's 20-Point Plan
Immediate Ceasefire: All hostilities between Israel and Hamas will cease immediately upon mutual agreement.
Hostage and Prisoner Exchange: Within 72 hours of agreement, all hostages held by Hamas will be released, including both living and deceased individuals. In return, Israel will release over 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 250 serving life sentences and 1,700 detained since October 7, 2023.
Demilitarization of Gaza: Hamas is required to disarm and dismantle its military infrastructure. Members who commit to peaceful coexistence and decommission their weapons will receive amnesty. Those choosing to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to countries that accept them.
Temporary Governance: Gaza will be governed by a temporary technocratic committee, with no role for Hamas. This committee will be overseen by an international "Board of Peace," chaired by President Trump and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Reconstruction and Economic Development: A comprehensive plan will be developed to rebuild Gaza, transforming it into a modern, economically vibrant region. This includes infrastructure development, job creation, and the establishment of a "Trump economic development plan" to revitalize the area.
Humanitarian Aid: Unconditional humanitarian assistance will be delivered via the United Nations and other neutral international organizations to ensure the well-being of Gaza's population.
International Stabilization Force: An international stabilization force will take over from Israeli defense forces to maintain security and assist in the transition to a peaceful and stable Gaza.
Future Pathway to Palestinian Statehood: While the plan does not immediately establish a Palestinian state, it envisions conditions for future self-determination once the Palestinian Authority undergoes reform and Gaza's redevelopment is successful.
Economic Integration: Gaza will be integrated into regional economic initiatives, fostering trade and cooperation with neighboring countries.
Education and Cultural Exchange: Programs will be established to promote education and cultural exchange, fostering mutual understanding and tolerance among different communities.
Infrastructure Development: Significant investments will be made in rebuilding Gaza's infrastructure, including roads, schools, and hospitals.
Environmental Sustainability: Efforts will be made to ensure that reconstruction is environmentally sustainable, promoting green technologies and practices.
Rule of Law: The establishment of a legal framework to ensure justice, human rights, and the rule of law within Gaza.
Security Sector Reform: Reforming Gaza's security sector to ensure that it operates under the rule of law and protects all citizens.
Media and Information: Promoting free and independent media to ensure transparency and accountability in governance.
Women's Rights: Ensuring the protection and promotion of women's rights, including participation in governance and economic activities.
Youth Engagement: Programs to engage youth in constructive activities, providing them with opportunities for education and employment.
Healthcare Access: Improving access to healthcare services for all residents of Gaza.
Social Services: Establishing social services to support vulnerable populations, including the elderly and disabled.
Monitoring and Accountability: Establishing mechanisms to monitor the implementation of the plan and hold all parties accountable for their commitments.
Praying for peace, and praying for President Trump, who is working hard to bring it to the world.I reluctantly have to give Trump credit where it is due. The fact that the international community is on board buttresses that observation…..
“In short, the Trump plan is a bunch of generally reasonable ideas that have been circulating for years but have not been implemented, because both parties to the conflict have strong reservations about some of them. The question is whether any of that has changed. Trump’s proposal has the backing of the European Union, the Palestinian Authority, key Arab states, Israeli hostage families, and the Hamas patrons Turkey and Qatar. At the White House, the plan also received qualified support from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who praised it as achieving Israel’s war aims.”Cred, I thought it was a good deal too, and my hope is that Hamas will take it. That would finally mean an end to so much needless suffering and maybe, just maybe, a chance for something better for the people of Gaza. It’s rare to see this kind of broad international support — from the EU, key Arab states, the Palestinian Authority, and even the families of Israeli hostages. For once, everyone seems to recognize the potential here. I give Trump credit for pulling together a plan that could bring this level of backing. If Hamas accepts, this could be the first real step toward peace in a long time.
I fear that if they don't, well, I think it will be tragic for the people who are still left in Gaza.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he would give Hamas “three or four days” to respond to his proposal to end the nearly two-year-long war in Gaza.
The president released a 20-point plan Monday during a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has already agreed. It calls for Hamas to disarm, return all the hostages within 72 hours and relinquish control of power.
A diplomat briefed on the matter and granted anonymity to describe the sensitive situation said Qatari and Egyptian officials presented Hamas negotiators with the proposal but there was no timeline for a Hamas response. The negotiators need to communicate it with people in Gaza, the diplomat said, which could take hours or days, depending on the situation on the ground.
Trump on Tuesday told reporters outside the White House the U.S.-designated terrorist group has “not much” room to negotiate.
“Hamas is either going to be doing it or it’s not, and if it’s not, it’s going to be a sad end,” Trump said.
Netanyahu on Monday promised that Israel would “finish the job” should Hamas not agree, and Trump on Tuesday said he would allow Israel to “go and do what they have to do.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/3 … hatgpt.comDonald Trump
Trump puts Hamas on notice with deadline to accept Gaza peace deal
President issues Hamas ultimatum on Truth Social with Sunday evening deadline
President Donald Trump issued a blistering public warning to Hamas on Friday, saying the "ruthless" terrorist group will be "hunted down, and killed" unless they release the remaining Israeli hostages and reach an agreement by Sunday evening.
"They will be given one last chance," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "THIS DEAL ALSO SPARES THE LIVES OF ALL REMAINING HAMAS FIGHTERS!"
"We will have PEACE in the Middle East one way or the other. The violence and bloodshed will stop," Trump added. "RELEASE THE HOSTAGES, ALL OF THEM, INCLUDING THE BODIES OF THOSE THAT ARE DEAD, NOW! An Agreement must be reached with Hamas by Sunday Evening at SIX (6) P.M., Washington, D.C. time." Trump
Trump said the United States, along with Israel and several wealthy Middle Eastern nations, have already agreed to a peace proposal. Failure to comply, he warned, would result in unprecedented military action against Hamas. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- … peace-deal
Red line---Absolutely no one takes the TACO seriously
Shar,
I like how he put the future of hamas in the hands of hamas.
Their future is now up to them.Mike, this plan is clearly well thought out and appears very fair. We’ll soon see whether, after 75 years, the terrorists are finally ready to say, “Enough.” History suggests they won’t, but they must realize that one way or another, their reign of terror will come to an end. I can’t imagine the consequences if they refuse to accept the plan. Perhaps they should take a serious look at what Trump has been doing to curb the flow of drugs into our country.
It’s clear to me that Trump works hard to keep his promises — and when necessary, he doesn’t hesitate to come down hard to get results.
Also, I note, Trump has recently indicated a significant shift in U.S. policy regarding Ukraine's ability to strike targets within Russia. Special Envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, revealed that President Trump had authorized Ukraine to conduct long-range missile strikes deep into Russian territory. This authorization includes targeting critical infrastructure such as energy facilities and potentially leadership sites in Moscow.
.Additionally, he has expressed openness to providing Ukraine with advanced weaponry, including Tomahawk cruise missiles, which would further enhance Ukraine's strike capabilities against Russian targets. Looks like he sees that Putin is not willing to negotiate in good faith.
I appreciate that he has indicated readiness to impose additional sanctions on Russia. He announced hopes to implement "very strong" tariffs. He has stated that he will only sanction Russia when all NATO countries stop purchasing oil from Russia and impose tariffs on China.
Shockingly, NATO countries have not stopped buying energy from Russia; ultimately, they are aiding in paying for the Russians to afford this war.
.Anyone who knows Putin or observed his action on the international stage, should have already known that he was not to be trusted. By providing the Ukraine with clearly offensive weapons, how long can the US stay out of the fray as an co-combatant. How long will Putin allow for this, crossing the line as a provocative act?
Cred, I can only give my view, but I see Trump as someone willing to try both the carrot and the stick. I think he approached this on at least two levels. First, he clearly wanted to do everything possible to prevent the U.S. from being drawn deeper into a war that could easily spiral into a huge mess. In that sense, I think he gave Putin every possible way to step back, and Putin simply didn’t take it. He used a very measured approach.
I see Trump as genuinely wanting to stop the war and the killing. That may require him to make hard decisions, and I’m not certain how directly involved he would get, but it seems clear to me that his focus is on preventing the conflict from turning into a prolonged, decade-long war with millions of deaths. I also get the sense that he sees the broader picture, he’s focused on results, not just rhetoric, and wants to end the bloodshed while keeping U.S. involvement measured.
At the same time, he has raised the stakes, and Putin will most likely respond aggressively. But we have no right to tell Ukraine to fight with one hand tied behind its back. From my perspective, this has been my view from day one, Ukraine was made the killing ground by NATO. That was a poor strategy and has led to what we see today. Russia should never have been allowed to cross into Ukraine. The pushback should have been overwhelming, with all of NATO standing firmly at the border.
Ultimately, this may now be the only way the war ends: by NATO taking responsibility for the actual fight. I don’t see Russia backing down under the current status quo.Cred, Trump stepped into the middle of a war. At first, it looked like he was trying to treat Putin with a degree of respect, maybe even offering him a way to exit gracefully. Clearly, that approach didn’t work. Now, Trump is faced with tough decisions. He still seems to be holding out hope that NATO nations will stop buying Russian energy and join the U.S. in imposing stronger, unified sanctions. The reality is that Russia can still afford its war, and whether people want to admit it or not, NATO’s continued energy purchases are helping to keep Putin’s war machine funded.
At this stage, Trump’s approval of Ukraine striking targets inside Russian cities is a move that is certain to anger Putin. On top of that, Trump has made it clear the U.S. will be supplying Ukraine with more powerful weapons, signaling a serious escalation in support. My God, it seems like yesterday when we were all going back and forth on Russia building up troops on Ukraine's border. So, will Ken be correct in the end-- a third world war?
Hey, I don’t like what I see. What are your thoughts?My thoughts is that Trump is doing a full 180 on his position in the conflict. Before, he blamed Biden for the war and claimed that it would not have started on his watch, sure…..
He castigated the Ukrainian president and initially wanted him to make concessions that would give in to Moscow.
Now, he wants to punish Russia by giving Ukraine all that it is needed and going further with offensive weapons that was not even coming from NATO before. That escalation may well be a bridge too far. For someone who boasted that he could end the war in a matter of hours after taking the oath, hours have turned into months. He is taking a big risk not knowing how Putin will react in response, are we being dragged into this?
Face it, Sharlee, Putin does not want a peaceful resolution short of attaining his military objectives. Anyone with any experience in these matters could have told you that. As for intimidating Putin, we really do not have any cards to play. Is Putin prepared to start WWIII over the Ukraine? There is no telling, but the conciliatory attitude toward Putin is considered weakness that he has exploited.
Ken may well be right, let’s hope not.From day one, I said that Russia wouldn’t stop once they entered Ukraine — and that, in the end, they would most likely win. The only way to stop them would be for NATO to fully step into the war, and my gut tells me that won’t happen. I also don’t believe Trump would drag us into another war. So it would seem we’ll continue to see Russia fight and NATO keep supplying weapons. At some point, both sides are going to run out of soldiers.
I see Putin ultimately getting what he wants, he just needs to wait out the U.S and NATO as to how far they are willing to go to protect the Ukraine.
Cred, I pretty much agree that was my thought the day that this war started, and still is. I don't see NATO stepping up with soldiers. I think this war will see a sad ending. I pray not...But NATO has stepped up many times in the past to aid non-NATO Nations when needed.
NATO has a history of intervening in conflicts to support countries under attack or facing overwhelming force, it has typically done so outside of Article 5 collective defense, since that only applies to member states. A few examples:
Bosnia and Herzegovina (1990s) – NATO conducted air strikes and deployed peacekeeping troops to protect civilians and help enforce UN resolutions during the Bosnian War, where local forces were unable to defend themselves effectively.
Kosovo (1999) – NATO launched a major air campaign against Yugoslav forces to stop ethnic cleansing and protect Kosovo’s population. This was a preventive intervention rather than a direct Article 5 defense.
Afghanistan (2001–2021) – NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time after 9/11, sending troops to combat al-Qaeda and Taliban forces that threatened Afghanistan. While Afghanistan was not a NATO member, the mission supported allied security interests and involved active combat operations.
Libya (2011) – NATO conducted air strikes to protect civilians during the civil war, enforcing UN Security Council resolutions to stop Gaddafi’s forces from overwhelming civilian populations.
So yes, NATO has deployed troops and conducted combat operations in situations where a nation was overpowered or civilians were at extreme risk, even when that nation was not a NATO member—but such actions typically require political consensus among member states. Will it come to this in Ukraine?NATO stepping up with soldiers? Can you please tell us what the NATO charter states as its purpose?
When do we get the medbeds???
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/hea … 423039007/Republicans are LYING again.
Vance & Mike Johnson claim Democrats want a shutdown to fund “free health care” for unauthorized immigrants.
Reality check: undocumented people are barred from ACA subsidies, Medicaid, Medicare & CHIP.
The only ones ripping health care away are Trump & the RepublicansPolls...
38-54 (Quinnipiac)
39-56 (Economist)
39-60 (AP)
40-56 (Gallup)
41-58 (Reuters)
UGLY AS SINMaking Meds Affordable--- This agreement marks a significant step toward reforming the U.S. healthcare system. While challenges remain, particularly in ensuring that other pharmaceutical companies follow suit, the partnership between the Trump administration and Pfizer sets a precedent for future negotiations aimed at reducing drug costs and improving access to healthcare for all Americans.
Trump and Pfizer Partner to Lower U.S. Drug Prices: A Game-Changer for American Healthcare
In a landmark move announced today, President Donald Trump revealed a significant agreement with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer aimed at dramatically reducing prescription drug costs for Americans. This initiative is part of the administration's broader strategy to align U.S. drug prices with those in other developed nations, ensuring that American consumers no longer subsidize global healthcare systems.
Key Components of the Agreement
Price Reductions for Medicaid Recipients: Pfizer has committed to lowering the prices of several medications for U.S. patients, particularly those enrolled in the Medicaid program. These reductions are expected to average over 50% off the list price, making essential medications more affordable for millions of Americans
Launch of TrumpRx – A Direct-to-Consumer Platform: The administration is introducing a new online platform, TrumpRx, which will allow Americans to purchase medications directly from the government at discounted rates. This initiative aims to bypass traditional insurance channels, offering a more streamlined and cost-effective way for consumers to access necessary drugs
New York Post
$70 Billion Investment in U.S. Manufacturing: In return for these concessions, Pfizer has pledged a substantial investment in domestic manufacturing. This move is expected to bolster the U.S. economy, create jobs, and reduce reliance on overseas production, aligning with the administration's "America First" policy
Reuters
National Benefits
Enhanced Affordability: By aligning U.S. drug prices with those in other high-income countries, the agreement aims to make essential medications more affordable for American consumers.
Economic Growth: Pfizer's investment in U.S. manufacturing is anticipated to create thousands of jobs, stimulate local economies, and reduce the nation's dependence on foreign production.
Increased Access to Medications: The introduction of TrumpRx will provide a more direct and efficient way for Americans to access necessary medications, potentially improving health outcomes nationwide.OH FANTASTIC... Just wondering how you get a prescription for those meds when you don't have a doctor BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE INSURANCE LOL
No other president could get this done--- More to come with other drug companies.
President Trump’s new drug discount initiatives represent a significant step forward in addressing the high cost of healthcare in the U.S. By making prescription medications more affordable, these programs will directly ease the financial burden on families who often struggle to pay for essential treatments. At the same time, lowering drug costs can help reduce the amount of money the government must spend on healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid, freeing up resources for other critical areas. Initiatives like these not only improve access to necessary medications but also create a more sustainable and efficient healthcare system for everyone.I think most of us will believe it when we see it because generally the man is a liar...
But still wondering how you get a prescription for medication when you cannot see a doctor because you do not have insurance????
Keeping Promise...
"President Donald Trump's administration found the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) and the Minnesota State High School League (MSHSL) in violation of Title IX after two two-month-long investigation into state policies and a transgender pitcher leading a girls' high school softball team to a state championship.
A Department of Education (ED) press release obtained by Fox News Digital cites the pitcher's performance in the 2025 season for the recent crackdown, stating "the male pitcher overpowered female athletes during five consecutive matches, only giving up one earned run over the course of 35 innings and striking out 27 female batters."
The release also cited instances of trans athletes competing in girls’ Alpine skiing, girls’ Nordic skiing, girls’ lacrosse, girls’ track and field team and girls’ volleyball.
"For too many years, Minnesota’s political leadership has found itself on the wrong side of justice, common sense, and the American people. Now the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League find themselves on the wrong side of Title IX by allowing males to compete in women’s sports," said DOE Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor.
"The Trump Administration will not allow Minnesota or any other state to sacrifice the safety, fair treatment, and dignity of its female students to appease the false idols of radical gender ideology. Once an education program or entity takes federal funds, Title IX compliance becomes mandatory. And the federal government will hold Minnesota accountable until it recognizes that fact."
The DOE and DHHS have now given the state and its education agencies a 10-day deadline to amend its policies to comply with Title IX and President Donald Trump's "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order.
The conditions for that agreement are:
MDE and MSHSL must rescind or revise any guidance permitting males to compete in girls’ sports to comply with Title IX and to reflect that to the extent State law conflicts with Title IX, federal law preempts State law;
MDE will issue a statewide notice to all federally funded entities operating interscholastic athletic programs mandating their strict compliance with Title IX by separating athletics and intimate facilities based on sex;
The notice will require these entities to adopt biology-based definitions of "male" and "female" and remind them that non-compliance with Title IX places their federal funding in jeopardy;
MDE and MSHSL will submit updated Title IX training, procedure, and process materials for ED’s OCR and HHS’ OCR to review and approve, and will conduct the approved training to MDE and MSHSL personnel;
MDE will restore to female athletes all records and titles misappropriated by male athletes competing in female categories, and send each female a letter of apology on behalf of the State of Minnesota for allowing her educational experience to be marred by sex discrimination. MDE will demand in writing that MSHSL take parallel action; and
MDE will require each school and MSHSL to submit to MDE an annual certification that they have complied with Title IX.
If these conditions are not met, the state agencies will be referred to the Department of Justice. The DOJ has already filed lawsuits against Maine's education agencies and California's over the same issue of trans athletes in girls' sports." Fox NewsA real crowning achievement... One for the legacy huh? High school softball.... Let the states handle their own business.... Remember when Maga railed about states rights??? I do.
Pete Hegseth's Address to Military Leaders: A Call for Discipline and a Return to Traditional Standards
This morning, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth delivered a speech at Marine Corps Base Quantico, addressing hundreds of senior military leaders. In his remarks, Hegseth declared an end to what he termed the "woke" culture within the U.S. military, emphasizing a return to strict discipline, traditional standards, and a focus on combat readiness.
Hegseth's address was marked by blunt language and a clear directive: "If the words I’m speaking today are making your heart sink, then you should do the honorable thing and resign," he stated, underscoring his commitment to restoring a "warrior ethos" across all branches of the military. He criticized the previous administration's policies, labeling them as overly politically correct and detrimental to military effectiveness. "We became the woke department. But not anymore," Hegseth proclaimed, signaling a shift towards a more traditional military culture.
Central to Hegseth's new directives are stringent physical fitness and grooming standards. He mandated that all combat personnel meet "male-level" physical fitness benchmarks, irrespective of gender, and reinstated strict grooming rules, including bans on beards and long hair. These measures aim to ensure uniformity and professionalism within the ranks.
Furthermore, Hegseth announced the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, asserting that such initiatives had become distractions from the military's primary mission. He also called for a reevaluation of how "toxic leadership," bullying, and hazing are defined, suggesting that previous definitions had been weaponized to punish tough leadership and promote risk-averse officers.
In his closing remarks, Hegseth invoked a direct message to adversaries: "To our enemies, FAFO," using an acronym for "f--- around and find out." This statement encapsulated his call for a military that is prepared, disciplined, and ready to respond decisively to threats.I'd love to know what the generals thought of being lectured to by a drunk washed up talk show host...
A Vision for Peace
The implementation of this 20-point plan represents a historic opportunity to end decades of conflict and suffering. By addressing the immediate humanitarian needs, ensuring the release of hostages and prisoners, and laying the groundwork for economic development and political reform, the plan offers a comprehensive approach to peace. The establishment of a neutral, technocratic governance structure aims to create a stable and secure environment for all residents of Gaza. If accepted and successfully implemented, this plan could mark the beginning of a new era of peace and prosperity in the region, providing hope for future generations.
While the plan's success hinges on Hamas's acceptance, the broad support it has garnered from Israel and key international actors underscores its potential as a transformative framework for peace. As negotiations continue, there is cautious optimism that this comprehensive approach can pave the way for a lasting resolution to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Full Summary of Trump's 20-Point Plan
Immediate Ceasefire: All hostilities between Israel and Hamas will cease immediately upon mutual agreement.
Hostage and Prisoner Exchange: Within 72 hours of agreement, all hostages held by Hamas will be released, including both living and deceased individuals. In return, Israel will release over 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 250 serving life sentences and 1,700 detained since October 7, 2023.
Demilitarization of Gaza: Hamas is required to disarm and dismantle its military infrastructure. Members who commit to peaceful coexistence and decommission their weapons will receive amnesty. Those choosing to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to countries that accept them.
Temporary Governance: Gaza will be governed by a temporary technocratic committee, with no role for Hamas. This committee will be overseen by an international "Board of Peace," chaired by President Trump and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Reconstruction and Economic Development: A comprehensive plan will be developed to rebuild Gaza, transforming it into a modern, economically vibrant region. This includes infrastructure development, job creation, and the establishment of a "Trump economic development plan" to revitalize the area.
Humanitarian Aid: Unconditional humanitarian assistance will be delivered via the United Nations and other neutral international organizations to ensure the well-being of Gaza's population.
International Stabilization Force: An international stabilization force will take over from Israeli defense forces to maintain security and assist in the transition to a peaceful and stable Gaza.
Future Pathway to Palestinian Statehood: While the plan does not immediately establish a Palestinian state, it envisions conditions for future self-determination once the Palestinian Authority undergoes reform and Gaza's redevelopment is successful.
Economic Integration: Gaza will be integrated into regional economic initiatives, fostering trade and cooperation with neighboring countries.
Education and Cultural Exchange: Programs will be established to promote education and cultural exchange, fostering mutual understanding and tolerance among different communities.
Infrastructure Development: Significant investments will be made in rebuilding Gaza's infrastructure, including roads, schools, and hospitals.
Environmental Sustainability: Efforts will be made to ensure that reconstruction is environmentally sustainable, promoting green technologies and practices.
Rule of Law: The establishment of a legal framework to ensure justice, human rights, and the rule of law within Gaza.
Security Sector Reform: Reforming Gaza's security sector to ensure that it operates under the rule of law and protects all citizens.
Media and Information: Promoting free and independent media to ensure transparency and accountability in governance.
Women's Rights: Ensuring the protection and promotion of women's rights, including participation in governance and economic activities.
Youth Engagement: Programs to engage youth in constructive activities, providing them with opportunities for education and employment.
Healthcare Access: Improving access to healthcare services for all residents of Gaza.
Social Services: Establishing social services to support vulnerable populations, including the elderly and disabled.
Monitoring and Accountability: Establishing mechanisms to monitor the implementation of the plan and hold all parties accountable for their commitments.
Praying for peace, and praying for President Trump, who is working hard to bring it to the world.
I reluctantly have to give Trump credit where it is due. The fact that the international community is on board buttresses that observation…..
“In short, the Trump plan is a bunch of generally reasonable ideas that have been circulating for years but have not been implemented, because both parties to the conflict have strong reservations about some of them. The question is whether any of that has changed. Trump’s proposal has the backing of the European Union, the Palestinian Authority, key Arab states, Israeli hostage families, and the Hamas patrons, Turkey and Qatar. At the White House, the plan also received qualified support from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who praised it as achieving Israel’s war aims.”
Today, President Donald Trump hosted a group of children and their families affected by pediatric cancer at the White House, where he signed an executive order aimed at enhancing cancer research through artificial intelligence (AI). The initiative includes a $50 million investment to expand the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI), a program he introduced in 2019. This funding is intended to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of pediatric cancers.
During the event, President Trump interacted with the children, expressing admiration for their resilience. A father of one of the children thanked the president for providing families with "the one thing that we most desperately need — and that's hope."
This initiative gives hope because it represents tangible, concrete action aimed directly at saving and improving the lives of children with cancer. For families facing a devastating diagnosis, knowing that the government is investing resources, funding cutting-edge research, and using advanced technologies like AI provides a sense that progress is possible and that their children’s treatment could become more effective, faster. AI can accelerate discoveries that might have taken decades, helping doctors identify better treatments, detect cancers earlier, and even prevent some types of pediatric cancer. Beyond the science, the initiative sends a powerful message: children with cancer are a priority, and society is mobilizing its best tools and expertise to help them. It’s a combination of practical support and symbolic reassurance, giving parents, patients, and the medical community reason to believe in a brighter, healthier future.
The executive order directs the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission to collaborate with the Office of Science and Technology Policy to leverage AI in analyzing cancer data. The goal is to develop more effective treatments and prevention strategies for pediatric cancer.
The executive order directing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission to collaborate with the Office of Science and Technology Policy is entirely feasible because of advances in artificial intelligence and data management. Modern AI can analyze massive amounts of medical data, such as patient histories, genetic information, tumor characteristics, and treatment outcomes, much faster than humans, helping researchers identify patterns that may lead to better treatments or earlier detection. By coordinating efforts across government agencies, hospitals, and universities, the initiative ensures that expertise and resources are shared efficiently, increasing the speed and quality of research. Existing AI tools are already being used in medicine to predict how cancers respond to drugs, identify biomarkers for early detection, and suggest potential new therapies. With dedicated funding, the program can hire data scientists, provide advanced computing resources, and support pilot programs in hospitals or research centers, all under ethical oversight. While the executive order does not promise instant cures, it sets realistic goals to improve research capabilities, treatment strategies, and prevention methods, making significant strides in pediatric cancer research possible.
This announcement comes amid broader discussions on healthcare policy, including efforts to reduce prescription drug costs. Earlier today, President Trump also announced an agreement with Pfizer to lower Medicaid drug prices and introduced the TrumpRx platform, which aims to provide consumers with direct access to discounted medications.
For more details on the executive order and the administration's efforts in pediatric cancer research, you can visit the official White House fact sheet.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/ … hatgpt.com"The Order instructs the MAHA Commission to work with the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology (APST) and the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto to develop innovative ways to use advanced technologies such as AI to unlock improved diagnoses, treatments, cures, and prevention strategies for pediatric and young adulthood cancer."
What kind of witchcraft is this? Crypto? Is he making money off of this?
How much in funding has he cut so far in cancer research? How much?
Refresher: The dispute with Harvard (and similar cases with other universities) arose because the Trump administration alleged that these institutions were misusing federal funding or acting in ways that violated certain federal rules, including claims about discrimination, policy disagreements, or financial accountability.
As of today, September 30, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that his administration has reached a tentative agreement with Harvard University involving a $500 million settlement. The proposed deal would require Harvard to invest in trade schools focused on artificial intelligence (AI) and other technical fields, potentially restoring over $2 billion in federal research grants that had been previously frozen. Education Secretary Linda McMahon is reportedly finalizing the details of the agreement. However, the deal has not yet been officially signed, and Harvard has not publicly commented on the announcement.
The settlement follows months of tension between the Trump administration and Harvard, including legal challenges and threats to revoke the university's tax-exempt status and restrict international student enrollment. Similar settlements have been reached with other universities, such as Columbia and Brown, which involved financial contributions to workforce development initiatives in exchange for restored federal funding.
The positive aspects of this tentative $500 million settlement with Harvard are:
Investment in Technical Education – The deal requires Harvard to fund trade schools focused on AI and other technical fields. This helps prepare students for high-demand careers, strengthens the workforce, and supports innovation in critical industries.
Restoration of Federal Research Grants – Over $2 billion in previously frozen federal funding could be restored, allowing universities to continue important research projects. This benefits scientific progress and the broader economy.
Encouragement of Accountability – The settlement ties financial support to tangible outcomes—like workforce development—which could ensure universities focus on measurable contributions to society.
Broader Workforce Benefits – Expanding trade and technical programs can give more Americans access to quality education and career opportunities, particularly in cutting-edge fields like AI.
Potential Model for Other Institutions – If successful, this approach could serve as a blueprint for other universities to partner with the government in developing skills-based programs that directly meet national needs.
In short, the positive is an investment in education, workforce readiness, and innovation that could benefit students, researchers, and the economy—even before the deal is officially signed.They are readying the military to use against American citizens...Harvard isn't going to matter a damn bit.
U.S. private companies lost 32,000 jobs in September, far below expectations of a 51,000 gain, payrolls processor ADP reported today
This marks the biggest decline since March 2023.
In addition to the drop in September, the August payrolls number was revised to a loss of 3,000 from an initially reported increase of 54,000...Making America safe again
President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced the National Guard is now in place in Portland, Oregon, reiterating the administration's commitment to restoring law and order in the city amid protests against immigration enforcement.
"Our GREAT Federal Law Enforcement Officers have not been able to enforce the Laws in Oregon," the president wrote. "ANTIFA and the Radical Left Anarchists have been viciously attacking our Federal Law Enforcement Officers, men and women who are simply doing their job, protecting Federal Property, and enforcing Federal Immigration Laws and the Rule of Law.
"We will never allow MOBS to take over our streets, burn our Cities, or destroy America. The National Guard is now in place, and has been dedicated to restoring LAW AND ORDER, and ending the Chaos, Death, and Destruction! We are a Nation of LAW, and we will PREVAIL."
A memo Monday by the Oregon Military Department confirmed 200 service members will be mobilized under Title 10 federal authority for operations in the Portland area, following a request for support from the Department of War, according to a FOX 12 Oregon report.
The state National Guard called the mission straightforward: "protect federal facilities and the federal employees working in them." Fox newsWill they be doing petunias, trash or both? Hopefully we'll get our money's worth... They didn't do a great job with the planting in dc.. most of them died...sloppy mulch work too
I find it also really quite strange that he says they're going into protect people and then all we see are the Jackboots marching as a show of force down the wealthiest streets they can find... Blocking retail and restaurants... Intimidating tourists and people trying to have a good time.... Political theater, all in service of one man's bloated ego... Taxpayers stuck with the bill of almost 2 million per day for this idiocy.Manufacture the crisis... The Biden Administration did that in spades bringing in tens of millions of migrants in just 4 years, many known criminals.
Add in the support for the most insane 'Progressive' movements... like men in women's sports, showers, and taking their scholarships and beaty pageant awards... create a "resistance"...
Thereby forcing the necessity for the Military to move in and take control of city after city... forcing the need for confrontation with the Left just so ICE can get the worst of the worst criminals deported out of the country...
As the Leftists wind themselves up to use violence and murder against those opposing their agendas... the government is forced to respond with increasingly authoritarian... tracking your every movement and tiktok post... control.
Things that make you go hmmmmm...Well at least you admit that the Trump bunch is authoritarian...
LOL the "leftists are winding up to murder people? ".
Where does that come from?
Portland’s ‘war zone’ exists solely in Trump’s head and his tweets....Americans aren't that stupid.
Is Trump going to bail out the other businesses who are going under or losing money because of his tariffs, or only people who sell soybeans to the Chinese?
Bessent: "It's unfortunate that Chinese leadership has decided to use American soybean farmers as a hostage or pawn in the trade negotiations. American farmers overwhelmingly voted for President Trump ... you should expect news on Tuesday on substantial support for our farmers."
Does he really think Americans are that stupid???
TF is wrong with him? If American farmers are being held hostage, it’s not by China, it’s by the failed strategy of a president who launched a trade war without a plan...
Trump promised farmers prosperity but wants to deliver bailouts for losses he caused. They call it “support” when it’s really damage control.
Farmers largely voted for him though...and now they are being sacrificed for political props and tariffs. Government pity checks to clean up White House messes? Nah... This is the second time around for these folks...no more. BOOTSTRAPS BABY!trump is going to bailout Argentina with our tariff money....funds collected through higher prices on literally everything.
Let that sink in... They really do think Americans are stupid...
Tariffs: the gift that keeps on taking. Trump's admin sold them as economic armor, then spent $20B of YOUR tariff taxes arming Argentina's farmers against ours. "America First" now looks like a going-out-of-business sale.
While U.S. soy prices crash & China buys 40 Argentine cargoes/week, American households pay $2,400/year in tariff taxes to fund this betrayal. trump bailed Argentina Oct 1 as they axed export taxes... precisely timed to prop Milei before Oct 26 elections. Our farmers get tariffs...theirs get subsidies.
Reverse Robin Hoods stealing from Iowa to bankroll Buenos Aires....
Related Discussions
- 230
Trump's Dream Team: Appointing for America's Success
by Sharlee 10 months ago
As I watch President-elect Trump appoint individuals to key positions, I believe he is making deliberate and strategic choices that align with his vision for America. Trump’s appointments reflect his commitment to his core agenda: putting America first, strengthening the economy, securing borders,...
- 142
Trump's Fitness for Office
by Willowarbor 3 weeks ago
Whether it be cognitive decline moral depravity, open corruption or blatant lies...put your examples, thoughts here.
- 59
Has anyone had a change of mind about Trump - either way?
by Catherine Mostly 8 years ago
Inquiring minds want to know... Has anyone changed their opinion of Donald Trump for whatever reason? I know he's lost a few supporters, but not very many; and it seems like we might be getting used to Trump's cadence. Things don't feel quite so raw, anymore. Am I right about that?I have never been...
- 23
Silence Is Complicity. This Is a Moral Crisis.
by Sharlee 6 months ago
I am absolutely furious. Two young adults were gunned down yesterday at a Jewish museum right here in the United States, not some foreign warzone, not a flashpoint overseas, but in our own backyard. This wasn't just a shooting. This was an act of targeted hatred, and it speaks to a dangerous,...
- 75
President Donald Trump is a Historic and Legendary American Figure
by Readmikenow 10 months ago
Monday, Jan. 20, 2025 will be an amazing, historic inaugural of the new president.Only the 1789 inauguration of President George Washington and the deeply threatened first inaugural of President Abraham Lincoln in 1861 will remain more significant in historic terms. However, it will rival the 1933...
- 645
To all that America was and stood for, I say goodbye
by Credence2 10 months ago
Excerpt from a commentary from Mike Lodgrum of Salon Magazine, most appropo in my opinion:No one can say that Trump ran a stealth campaign. He clearly told the American people his agenda. Now imagine if any politician told the electorate the following:I will lower your standard of living by putting...