There is no difference between the millionaire lady who collected food stamps and the libertarian religion of self and selfishness. Only the libertarian religion is codified and is a philosophy that puts self first.
Mankind has moments of good behavior, but mankind is not good, which makes libertarians dangerous, as they believe self interest will make everything good in society. This is a naive utopianism:
http://news.yahoo.com/food-stamp-millio … 00238.html
if you're going to call libertarianism a religion, then so will be liberalism and conservatism.
You seem to not understand how "saying things now will bite you in the bum later", as is evidenced in your comments about Ron Paul, despite not understanding his philosophies, and further evidenced by your posts about the definition of the word "middle".
All this aside, your post is clearly a troll post designed to garner a response from me.
I understand that it is difficult for a liberal to understand, but receiving welfare is theft, and earning money on your own is called "earning money".
Oh well, I tried.
I wanted to point out that the REAL debate on this forum is about the issues I talked about in the post here. No one has bothered to counter any of my points.
That's how I know it was a troll post.
What post where? BTW, I think that the exaltation of self is psychopathic, and libertarianism has a high percentage of psychopaths among it's members.
No one has addressed the core of my arguments still?
... glad I wasted my time.
Keep trollin' trollin' trollin'.
Yeah well, I caught this young lady's act. She feels that she is still "entitled" to collect $200 a monthly in food assistance despite hitting the lottery for a million. The problem lies in the fact that for decades now our society has bred that entitlement attitude into youth. They feel that it is selfish of those who foot the bill to deny them their "rights." Rubbish.
Your problem is that you can't seem to distinguish between necessary entitlement and unnecessary entitlement.
Unnecessary entitlement is based upon the libertarian philosophy of greed and self interest first. The way it plays out with libertarians is that they view taxes as stealing and they don't give government its legitimate place. But it is the same sort of selfishness. Selfishness is selfishness.
The libertarians are subversive, sort of like the communists but different.
Social Darwinism is another term for it. Or Rand's objectivism.
If you want to call "freedom" "social darwinism", then it is only fair to call "our current government" "addictive poison".
People become addicted to the welfare state and can't leave the system. The government claims to be able to fix poverty, and has utterly failed in its 60 year+ journey.
Companies become addicted to federal funding, and now we have endless wars continued by spineless, war-mongering politicians. Now countless resources are funneled into pointless wars. It's gotten to the point where even the anti-war party is pro-war.
Our educators are addicted to the state. People are ACTUALLY taught that "spending massively on killing people" is GOOD for the economy!
I'll take "survival of the fittest" over "forced poison" any day.
Come on Evan, give it your best shot! Any other resident libertarians in the house who would like to pick a fight with me??
You're picking a fight, not me.
Your God King, Obama awaits your kiss upon his ring.
Obama is the lesser of two evils. I never said I was a fan. I just know what I know when it comes to the libertarian excuse for big business to screw the rest of us.
Last time I checked, "the lesser of two evils" has had us over a barrel for the past 3 years.
Lord knows I never signed the bailouts into law.
That's a wrap.
I am for the winding down of the TBTF banks one at a time. Neither party seems to have the guts to do that. However, both parties bailed out the banks, and if we had not stopped the money market run from our money markets, our financial system would have even had a greater collapse.
I was not against bailouts, but we should have got the bonuses back and a piece of the companies bailed out, including JPM and GS.
I'm still waiting for my free car from GM too.
"Neither party has the guts to do that"
YEAH! THAT'S THE POINT.
And since Ron Paul believes in the invisible hand of self interest his pseudo phony religious beliefs won't let him cross the banks and stop speculation.
THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS IS A MAN RESPONSIBLE FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DEATHS.
I'm not necessarily libertarian (or any religion) but I do believe man is good and has moments of badder days. Maybe that's the difference, seeing the glass half full kind of thing, taking responsibility for oneself, or self-nterest.
No, man is not basically good. If that were the case, the scamming bankers would not have unleashed the housing bubble that stole trillions of dollars of wealth from main street and transferred it into the coffers of the 1 percent.
If man was basically good there would not need to be police or referees at basketball games.
Good for you Evan, spotting someone trying to tease you. "Troll" is a bit strong.
If your position on food stamps is that they are wrong in principle that is sufficient.
My dad once heard a girl (a relative) complaining about a problem with "her" food stamps, angry that they'd messed something up one month and said, "They OWE me this much!"
My dad's angry comment was, "They? Who is 'they'? You mean me, who's paying taxes that are used to feed you when I was never even asked? Why have I never heard 'Thank you'?"
It was great, I really don't think she understood - she's American and 'the government', a disembodied entity of boundless supply was supposed to take care of her. She had questions then and has a different attitude now. And a job.
"she's American and 'the government', a disembodied entity of boundless supply was supposed to take care of he"
I've been there. Ron Paul and the Mises Institute saved me from blunt ignorance.
Now I fight day in and day out on these forums to wake people up.
And the failure of libertarianism continues daily as the 1 percent extracts a speculative price you pay for gasoline, food and every commodity you buy.
You have yet to illustrate a single failure of libertarianism.
Jeff Berndt did a pretty good job and actually made me think. But I turned it all back around on him.
The UK big bang, Thatcherism, is a massive failure of libertarianism. That sowed the seeds of our housing bubble because, guess what, Evan, there was no Glass-Steagall in the Square Mile.
A government bank is a failure of libertarianism?
Are you even thinking before you write?
No, the private bankers broke down the barriers between the insurance, banking and investment banking sectors, causing bogus derivatives products to be offered. Under Glass-Steagall these weapons of financial mass destruction could not have been offered. The origination of these financial derivatives was the Square Mile.
MF Global and Madoff failed while engaged in business in the Square Mile. Wall Street is restrained a little bit. The Square Mile has no restraint because it answers to no one, not even Parliament.
Man, you really like to be confused.
Your first post said "The UK big bank", and then now you're calling it a private bank.
Central banks are government created monopolies; they are government extensions that wouldn't exist in a free-market.
It isn't libertarianism, and this BLATANT and INTENTIONAL failure to recognize this is the reason why I criticized your book.
You're criticizing things without even an understanding of what they are.
This example hardly proves anything, and in turn is hardly enough to get annoyed about. Liberals are going to have to do better than that.
It's funny how the Republicans are always telling me greed is good and people should act out of self interest and then when someone commits a shocking act of greed and self interest they are all up in arms about it
IMO, there's a huge difference between greed and self-interest. Greed can hurt others and may only hurt oneself or hurt no one. Self-interest is healthy and shows a responsibility toward assuming control of one's life. IMO
No, it's ignorance on the behalf of the liberal.
When people get bailed out with taxpayer money, it's theft and wrong.
The car companies prove that some bailouts are good unless you wanted just Japanese auto makers with no American choices.
And, on top of that, without some bailouts the financial system and all insurance could have crumbled. I suggest the US could have gotten a piece of GS and JPM, and the bailouts were handled wrongly for taxpayers. But the bailouts may have been absolutely necessary.
The libertarian way is to just plunge the world into a Great Depression and see what happens. The fallacy of Mises is that he thought loan demand would bounce back after credit crises. Apparently that is not true.
Oh man, I would have had to choose between 4 or more AWESOME Japanese car companies OR some 10 different European Car companies?!?!
STEAL MY MONEY TO SAVE ME FROM SUCH OBVIOUS MONOPOLIES!!!
Dude, seriously. You're embarrassing yourself.
I see little difference between greed and entitlement as far as selfishness goes. And if people were basically good they wouldn't need a monetary incentive to contribute their fair share to society.
I wonder if the Japanese complain on their forums that all of their automotive manufacturing jobs are being outsourced to the United States.
Ha! I love Japanese cars. I have no beef with the Japanese. But if we have auto makers who can be successful, and they preserve jobs, what is the problem helping them? Evan does not bother to tell you that the car companies have paid or nearly paid back the government in full.
Evan won't tell you much. That is the way of the libertarian. If you find out the dark side of libertarians you will shun them and it hurts their feelings since most of them think the world evolves around them. After all, self is all there is, the god of the libertarians.
by Stacie L 6 years ago
Fla. bill would ban buying sweets with food stampsBy KELLI KENNEDYupdated 2/5/2012 8:51:18 AM ETFORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. Florida's poor can use food stamps to buy staples like milk, vegetables, fruits and meat. But they can also use them to buy sweets like cakes, cookies and Jell-O and snack foods...
by Steven Escareno 7 years ago
I just read this article, and I wanted to get everyone's take on it. a guy just won the lottery, and still collects food stamps to this day because it's considered a liquid asset. Therefore, he's still technically eligible to receive food stamps, due to this technicality. What are...
by LAURENS WRIGHT 5 years ago
What techniques do people on welfare to get expensive cars, booze, cigarettes and drugs?The more I work and pay taxes, the more that I see the people on welfare driving very expensive cars, drinking booze, buying hundreds of dollars of groceries and always smoking. It seems that if these...
by LAURENS WRIGHT 5 years ago
How should welfare be handled, other than just handing out money, food stamps, gifts, homes, etc?I work in a low income housing complex of over 200 apartments. People there get the apartments for at least $50, every thing included, up to $1200 in food stamps, up to $800 in allowance, WIC,...
by Annsalo 2 years ago
Why does the misconception that people who get Food stamps don't work continue?Out of those that get EBT/SNAP/Food stamps 60% have employed adults in the household. Also 20% of those getting those benefits are unable to work due to being elderly or disabled. So that leaves very few that are...
by ptosis 14 months ago
The truth about Trump's tax cuts; Republican tax cuts go largely to the rich. There is indeed no case whatsoever for reducing the personal income tax rates on high-income Americans. The richest Americans are already enjoying an era of unprecedented wealth and prosperity.The truth is that the United...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|