jump to last post 1-17 of 17 posts

Hub Page Should Make Some Changes

  1. shanekruger profile image81
    shanekruger
    173 posts
    Joined: 2 months ago
    Hubs: 27
    Fans: 56

    Hi,

    I think that hub pages should make some changes like below 75 they are providing no follow. Should Change it, other wise no benefit from link building prospective.

    What you guyz think?

    Should Change it OR Not

    Thanks,
    Shane Kruger

    Posted 6 weeks ago
  2. AEvans profile image95
    AEvans
    3615 posts
    Joined: 2 years ago
    Hubs: 107
    Fans: 1134

    shanekruger wrote:

    Hi,

    I think that hub pages should make some changes like below 75 they are providing no follow. Should Change it, other wise no benefit from link building prospective.

    What you guyz think?

    Should Change it OR Not

    Thanks,
    Shane Kruger

    It should stay you become a better writer and strive for success when you have goals to reach. Life is not that easy nor should hubpages be. smile

    Posted 6 weeks ago
  3. Pr0metheus profile image81
    Pr0metheus
    860 posts
    Joined: 3 months ago
    Hubs: 29
    Fans: 64

    What's the hub score restriction for links?

    Posted 6 weeks ago
  4. darkside profile image97
    darkside
    4588 posts
    Joined: 3 years ago
    Hubs: 209
    Fans: 1092

    shanekruger wrote:

    What you guyz think?

    I think it's an excellent speed hump. If you can't produce the quality, you don't get the rewards.

    In fact they should bump the hub Hubscore threshold back up to 50, maybe even 55. And the Hubberscore threshold should be 80.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  5. retellect profile image88
    retellect
    215 posts
    Joined: 2 months ago
    Hubs: 29
    Fans: 56

    I didn't know that was the case, it kinda makes sense though after checking some of my hubs in google.

    I agree with Darkside though, if it is bumped up back to 50 it will benefit all good hubbers. Alot of low quality hubs contribute to bringing down the rest on a whole, if it was higer then we all would benefit from this.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  6. Pearldiver profile image92
    Pearldiver
    2537 posts
    Joined: 7 months ago
    Hubs: 23
    Fans: 255

    darkside wrote:

    shanekruger wrote:

    What you guyz think?

    I think it's an excellent speed hump. If you can't produce the quality, you don't get the rewards.

    In fact they should bump the hub Hubscore threshold back up to 50, maybe even 55. And the Hubberscore threshold should be 80.

    I agree: I can't believe how poorly some write here.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  7. thefinancestudent profile image89
    thefinancestudent
    2 posts
    Joined: 3 months ago
    Hubs: 106
    Fans: 14

    I like it the way it is because it requires Hubbers to not be lazy and scares away the spammers.  The score is what causes Hubpages to be so great for link building.  If you cannot keep your score above the 75 level, then build links elsewhere.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  8. Nelle Hoxie profile image98
    Nelle Hoxie
    1626 posts
    Joined: 9 months ago
    Hubs: 251
    Fans: 336

    I prefer the higher standards. Hubpages is not intended to be a link farm.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  9. Sue Adams profile image87
    Sue Adams
    236 posts
    Joined: 3 months ago
    Hubs: 21
    Fans: 64

    I agree, up with the standards.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  10. Misha profile image90
    Misha
    10900 posts
    Joined: 2 years ago
    Hubs: 18
    Fans: 1888

    I never seen any of my published hubs going back below 60. Well, frankly below 65 I think, but just to give it a safety cushion - 60 will do for me. smile

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  11. Marisa Wright profile image95
    Marisa Wright
    3270 posts
    Joined: 2 years ago
    Hubs: 91
    Fans: 1077

    Nelle Hoxie wrote:

    I prefer the higher standards. Hubpages is not intended to be a link farm.

    I agree.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  12. Len Cannon profile image96
    Len Cannon
    265 posts
    Joined: 14 months ago
    Hubs: 43
    Fans: 144

    Well, I think the restriction is more for "our" benefit and not so much YOURS.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  13. spease profile image95
    spease
    107 posts
    Joined: 4 months ago
    Hubs: 73
    Fans: 29

    I agree, they should not be lowered.  It does make you write better.  I have gone back and fixed some of my first hubs to make them better.  I want all of mine to be over 70. That is just my goal.

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  14. anjalichugh profile image93
    anjalichugh
    360 posts
    Joined: 11 months ago
    Hubs: 53
    Fans: 377

    Sue Adams wrote:

    I agree, up with the standards.

    Me too. HP is all about standards and I'm glad to be a part of it. smile

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  15. Shalini Kagal profile image100
    Shalini Kagal
    647 posts
    Joined: 17 months ago
    Hubs: 106
    Fans: 682

    Amen smile

    Posted 5 weeks ago
  16. Rhianni32 profile image88
    Rhianni32
    64 posts
    Joined: 5 months ago
    Hubs: 17
    Fans: 13

    Keep the current standard. 75 is ridiculously easy to get. Just put up some quality and be an active member in the community. Even add in a 50 per hub standard.  You almost have to TRY to get below a 50.
    Lots of other article sites that dont have standards fall or of favor with google and thusly hurt the link building that the OP is talking about.

    Posted 3 weeks ago
  17. mtsi1098 profile image94
    mtsi1098
    1767 posts
    Joined: 5 months ago
    Hubs: 51
    Fans: 104

    Rhianni32 wrote:

    Keep the current standard. 75 is ridiculously easy to get. Just put up some quality and be an active member in the community. Even add in a 50 per hub standard.  You almost have to TRY to get below a 50.
    Lots of other article sites that dont have standards fall or of favor with google and thusly hurt the link building that the OP is talking about.

    I agree

    Posted 3 weeks ago
 
working