Parents lose their kids over innoncent pictures...

Jump to Last Post 1-17 of 17 discussions (20 posts)
  1. pageantgirl31413 profile image79
    pageantgirl31413posted 13 years ago

    Way to go seriously, this is ridiculous (did I spell it right smile )  Let me know if the site doesn't work. … parents%2F

    These types of stories amaze me. What happened to common sense? Oooo good idea for a hub!

    1. jiberish profile image78
      jiberishposted 13 years agoin reply to this


    2. profile image0
      cosetteposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      it's amazing that the state can come in and take someone's children away from them - children obviously well cared-for and yet little kids who are obvious abuse cases and who are in the system already are ignored until they get beaten to death by their mom and mom's boyfriend.

  2. pageantgirl31413 profile image79
    pageantgirl31413posted 13 years ago

    I'm sure worse pictures than that go through walmart every day. Why would they pick on them like that? Gosh, I'm happy with a camera phone because they would probably be upset and label me a sex offender if I took it to walmart because I took pictures of my son's bath time after his first birthday, trying to scrub off the frosting from his cake.

  3. Anna Marie Bowman profile image74
    Anna Marie Bowmanposted 13 years ago

    That is terrible!!!  He is right... so many parents have similar photos of their kids.  I have pics of my daughter like that when she was a little baby.  It's just stupid what some people do to others for no reason.

  4. Susana S profile image93
    Susana Sposted 13 years ago

    I can't believe it even went to court. What damage it will have done to that family and especially those children. This is a great example of how social services are sometimes more abusive than those they think they're "helping". Total A-holes!

  5. Sybil Marie profile image59
    Sybil Marieposted 13 years ago

    Think the pendulum has swung way to far the other way! When I was small (back when the dinosaurs still walked the earth LOL) there was no real protection for children, and now we have the photo police! Unbelievable!

  6. Gemsong profile image63
    Gemsongposted 13 years ago

    Cheesy peesy. I guess I better hide all the pictures I took of my son when he was an adorable baby at bathtime.

    This is past ridiculous and on to just pathetic.

  7. Misha profile image63
    Mishaposted 13 years ago

    I think the vast majority of cases when government takes custody of children are as ridiculous as this one. It all starts with the notion that somebody but parents can know better what is good and what is bad for their children. sad

  8. Ivorwen profile image66
    Ivorwenposted 13 years ago

    This is why absolutely refuse to support any cause that says it is to 'protect' the children!  There are laws in place to protect abused children, but they are rarely used.  The only ones that suffer are the innocent.  The ones who lose their children are the ones that are trying hard to do what is right.  Those that do not care are given in home 'training' and then left alone.

  9. pageantgirl31413 profile image79
    pageantgirl31413posted 13 years ago

    Yeah, they are supposed to be protecting. They could of been doing something productive like bringing in a parole violator or something instead of taking these people to court.

  10. Lisa HW profile image60
    Lisa HWposted 13 years ago

    Much of the time kids of innocent parents are removed, while kids who should be taken are not.  (Haleigh Poutre, a little Massachusetts girl whose case became famous nationwide, was left with a horrible, adoptive mother/bio aunt after 17 incidents were reported to DSS.  It wasn't until Haleigh got beaten into a coma with a baseball bat that people figured out she wasn't, at adults in the case said/believed, "hurting herself".)  Oh - and we only knew about Haleigh because DSS wanted to get her removed from life support because doctors said she'd always be in a vegetative state.  The courts didn't allow it, and now, although she has brain damage, Haleigh can feed herself and do a few things.

    Then we (in Massachusetts) started hearing things like, "Well, we can't always know" and "Western Mass doctors and social workers aren't as 'expert' as those in the Boston area."   Is there any wonder people who can't/won't trust people in the government to "be expert" and "know"?  hmm

  11. profile image0
    Madame Xposted 13 years ago

    This is the "nanny state" totally out of control. They did much more harm to those kids by "removing" them from their home for a month than any picture ever did. I agree with jiberish - pathetic!

    1. Lisa HW profile image60
      Lisa HWposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      There's often no common sense in a case like this.  Considering what the pictures were, even if they wanted to investigate what would really make much of a difference if they left the children with their parents until they talked to the parents?    I mean, worst case, if the parents were actually taking porn photos, the risk would be that they'd take some more.  At the point, what real difference would it make?  The parents weren't being accused of beating the children.  What, exactly, was the emergency in removing them first and investigating later?  (I'm not defending kiddy porn and saying it doesn't matter, by the way - but this is a different situation, and they could have used some common sense even if they couldn't immediately be sure.)

  12. mayhmong profile image78
    mayhmongposted 13 years ago

    It had to go that far for one picture?!

    Sheesh, and I use to develop pictures as a job. Theres a lot of perverted people out there. Just wish they would warned me before I had to process them dirty pictures since everyone else at the register can see them too!

  13. rsmallory profile image66
    rsmalloryposted 13 years ago

    I saw this story on AOL News and thought-how crazy! I have pics like these of my kids when they were little. WTF? It's crazy!

  14. Stacie L profile image88
    Stacie Lposted 13 years ago

    so i guess all those bare baby on a bearskin rug photos that used to be so popular are all porn now?
    gimme a break

  15. qbanmamiof2 profile image60
    qbanmamiof2posted 13 years ago

    I can't beleive this, first I would beat the crap out of that wal-mart employee, if you're gonna take my kids do it because I beat the living crap out of someone that doesn't have anything better to do than to mess up families.

    Wal-mart is going to lose a lot of money and I hope that family wins that law-suit.

    Gosh =/

  16. pageantgirl31413 profile image79
    pageantgirl31413posted 13 years ago

    Well, you know they will win the case against walmart or at least a settlement. They will probably get a lot of money off of it.

  17. anjalichugh profile image68
    anjalichughposted 13 years ago

    It's ridiculous. I wonder what these kids are going to think of their parents when they grow up. It amounts to deliberately and unnecessarily putting the kids through psychological trauma apart from breaking their bond with their parents. Where's this society heading towards! It's a shame that we are living in a kind of world where the sanctity in a parent-child relationship is either viewed with suspicion or not believed to exist at all.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)