Hi I noticed recently that when hubs are listed in the Google search results the 2nd link doesn't got to the hub but to the category page - for example:
You can see the tumblr page has the normal double link to the page ranked - but the hubpage doesn't the 2nd link is to
http://hubpages.com/topics/travel-and-p … ideas/5483
and the 3rd link is to
http://hubpages.com/topics/travel-and-p … -tips/5493
So even if the searcher finds your hub its quite likely that they won't end up on your hub - but on a category page.
But on the category page - which used to link the best hubs in a category are now utterly dominated by unrelated hubs which happen to have won the writing contest!
Its basic SEO not to link to unrelated pages from a page you want to promote - staff have been asking to remove unrelated tags and links to unrealted RSS feeds for this very reason.
But on the pages they are promoting on Google - they have added a whole pile of unrelated links - in fact from what I saw there was only ONE link to a hub in the relevant category. There are a number of related tag pages (which have the same issues as the category pages)
Then we have 4 links to judges - predominantly external pages- not related to topic to hand
Then there are 8 links to hubs not related to the topic of the page
then there are dozens of links to hubbers profiles - most of whome probably don't write on the topic to hand
If I clicked on a link that said travel tips- I don't expect to find a writing contest - I want - maybe - travel tips ???
Will be interested in reading the answer to this one also.
Hmmm, I just clicked on "topics" and checked a bunch and every single page has the exact same thing on it. Isn't that a duplicate content problem as well? I've always understood the real problem with duplicate content is content duplicated on the SAME Website ... and here is Hubpages duplicating the same information on literally thousands of pages.
How would I even use the Topics section to find articles on the topic in question when I can't see past the completely unrelated information that takes up the entire page? How is this even remotely search engine or USER friendly?? The actual topic appears to be relegated to the sidebar, which I didn't even notice the first time I looked at it.
How long has this been going on? I hadn't checked the topics page in ages till you just mentioned it. That is pretty bad!
And the second link in a Google search not going to the hub? How did that happen?
Maybe a few weeks? Not sure - I rather think that it may be more responsible for my drop in traffic early April rather than the so-called Panda II roll-out.
I don't know how they are manipulating the 2nd link - but I'd like to know - I could use it on my own sites to my own advantage :-)
'How long has this been going on?'
At least a month, if not two. I assume its purpose is to entice in new authors. Rather than to promote the contest to (or content of) existing hubbers. Something that, with everybody putting down their pens (as it were), and/or jumping ship. HP are going to need more than ever.
If that's the case then I am really concerned about the lack of SEO knowledge in HP HQ - if it was showing on the categories about writing and publishing online - it would make some sense - but a searcher who is looking for vacation packing tips (the search I used) doesn't want to write online - they want to pack for vacation!
The net result of providing an irrelevant page is a) pissing off the user who will immediately click back off the page and b) pissing off Google cause they will see the bounce rate skyrocket
Yup - find a naive computer user and watch over their shoulder as they click around trying to find something from Google results - its instructive
Well I've had a site drop out of the serps like a stone because it got a burst of social media traffic who clicked thru and than back out immediately - thus putting the bounce rate up ...
Did google rep tell you this or this was just your guess?
Well I got rid of the social traffic and the site went back to where it was in the SERPS - stop being an arse Misha!
I hear you. And couldn't agree more. I can guarantee you that it annoys searchers. Because as somebody who often searches for hubs by category. It annoys me.
The first few times I came across it, I didn't even realise that the: hot/best/latest options were still there. With all that blue, and the massive pic/logo for the contest, making the genuine search options kind of difficult to see. It's definitely very misleading.
It's really hard to find a hub in a category you want to read. I gave up after a while and went to another site to look for the subjects I wanted to read about. Quite annoying and no longer user friendly.
I noticed this last week,as well. I tried to check out the Dance categories and discovered, basically, that it was impossible. Or it was impossible as far as I could see - and I'm fairly internet savvy, so what chance does the average punter have?
I'd love to know how the 2nd link has been manipulated, and yes I have seen this a few times, Lissie. Ho hum. What are we to make of this? I am glad you brought this up. I am looking forward to seeing what the response to this is. This is well spotted, Lissie! Cheers!
I Brought this up in the forums, months ago.. that the all the links on my pages AND my referral trackers had been turned off and redirected!!! So it is not simply a case of what you are saying Lis! This has been equal to cheating and this has been happening in one form or another for ages! I KNOW HOW my pages and links have been raided and historically I have asked for explanations, to no avail.
This is ALSO part of the reason that I have been suggesting hubbers manually load their hub URLs to the Search Engines.
So... What Lunar Antics are in play?
Why ARE such blatant departures from ethical trading practices made, that can only serve the party compromising our trust and good faith in this site?
This is REALLY VERY SERIOUS stuff...
Why the departure from BASIC SEO Practice?
Why was there a belief that the community would NEVER KNOW?
Pearldiver, if what you say is really happening, can it really benefit HP?
None of it benefits a Bona Fide Business.
None of it benefits Bona Fide Writers.
As community members, we are able to identify the negative effects of this on our relationships and how it relates to our good faith and reasonable expectations of the site. We have all promoted the site positively, yet that appears glaringly obvious that the Real Commercial Value of Our Efforts here have also been Manipulated per those link redirections etc.
HP have benefited extensively from 1000s of dodgy hubs written by parties only known to HP which were written Specifically to mislead the public wwwww. Yohooooo dot com etc.
One MUST ASK the meaning and beneficial purpose of such practice, as clearly it appears to be ethically acceptable to allow such potentially fraudulent and deceptive material and practices to occur! However, there are 'other' interests here also that may well have 'engineered' the situation. I know that 99% of the likes of wwwww. hubs were chock full of Links from Pakistani hubbers and their friends! They use such links to communicate among themselves also... (It is a Coded Form of Communication that sails under the Radar because it appears on the surface to be just a meaningless blah blah) Factually, it isn't and could factually be used as a pretty smart form of communication by terrorist cells or girl guide biscuit sellers!
- One must also ASK WHY such documents still remain published here and WHY some of the parties who wrote them and stole other content.. still remain here?
- The Biggest Insult is being banned, trolled or abused for TRYING genuinely to help a site that has been given the benefit of the doubt... yet doesn't appreciate their party being gate-crashed, albeit in an attempt to Limit the Damage!
But Aya... can it really benefit HP... Deception like this? I'm the wrong person to ask!
It does make me wonder why so many of those hubs are still published. I know the folks at HP are busy with reviewing hubs and have a backlog.
It will help to search by the deceptively titled hubs like:
I am sure they are working on it and will hopefully be address the large inventory at once. Of course, almost all of those hubbers have 1M+ views, so that will definitely hurt...unless they fix the hubs by adding the word "review" to the end of the title. I don't envy HP for having to figure out the policy for those...
They aren't and Never have been Reviews!
They are a group of very SENSITIVE warts that appear to be highly important to certain personalities!
But this is a secondary issue to that which was stated by the OP.. so I won't comment further.. though please don't read that as me having a flawed understanding of the games, players or methods!
PD, not sure what I said to upset you...I personally agree that they aren't reviews, but adding that word to the title does seem to be the current workaround.
I was just agreeing with your comments about these type of hubs.
And I agree that this is secondary to the OP.
Nope you didn't upset me and I wasn't upset.. I was merely stepping aside for the primary issues, without shutting the door on the secondary ones. Sorry about that mate!
- Nope you're not an arse Misha..
I'm sure the reference related to a feeling rather than an appearance!
Oh, and btw, what's wrong with www hubs? Are they breaking any law?
@Misha... Now THAT'S Debatable isn't it...
But I believe that the apparently non-sensible posts on many of them were used and are directly responsible for this occurrence!
Overly promotional and keyword stuffed are 2 that come readily to mind.
I don't think so. If hubs are being reviewed for either new rules or newly enforced rules, then I think it is fair to look at all of them. It doesn't seem right to exclude a group of hubs for any reason.
If I understand you correctly Lissie the first part of your post relates to the secondary links that appear in the green text under the page snippet (or page description) of the Google search result. If so, this has been happening for some time and has nothing to do with HP other than it reflects site structure. It’s just the way Google shows some results, think of these links as if they were breadcrumbs.
The pages these links point to have been designed to support an architecture that lets search engines penetrate deep into the HP site and distribute link juice, yet it looks like all the duplication may be having a negative effect on this. I believe this is seriously hurting HP and more time should be spent getting these sort of issues resolved than the current witch hunt for hubs that no longer meet HPs standards, whatever those are.
If you click on the links that point out from those pages you will discover that many of them are not indexed. Whether that has something to do with the dupe content or not I am not 100% sure, but it is an issue HP should be trying to resolve ASAP as well as making them more useful to visitors.
I noticed this too and wa not particularly happy with it, think it might have been a google change though.
Silence... there is so much accurately written about it!
Including "You have ......
It's not happening for everything though which is really odd if its a google change.
There is essentially a micro format for breadcrumbs that Google interprets based on how each Hub is categorized. The hierarchy of the site is an important element for creating themes of related content to be crawled indexed and classified by search engines. HubPages has a deep taxonomy and when the correct micro format for breadcrumbs is used, Google can display them at the bottom of the snippet. The primary reason for this is to help Hubs be better classified as well as good for the searcher.
We run many tests and try different things. The contest information on the category pages was one of them. As the contest has ended, they will be coming down shortly. We will evaluate the results and apply them to future contests. The initial numbers show that search traffic to these pages was essentially flat during the month.
At the core of the changes we make, and the things we test is improving the site for all the great Hubbers. Be assured, we don't take it lightly. We are listening, doing our best to deliver a service you'll love and behind the scenes we are fighting for all of you as well.
Thanks Paul, appreciated...
You are the one that needs to continue to talk to us Paul.. like this.. not solely via the blog ... cheers.
Paul - Can you please tell me roughly when you started using microformats for breadcrumbs and when Google started using it in the SERPs? I would like to compare that to my traffic stats.
Re the Content Info on Category Pages - Seems an odd time to be conducting traffic-destroying experiments that also fly in the face of rules about relevance that you are enforcing for hubbers. It's basically "do as I say, not what I do" hypocrisy.
Bumping this thread right up...
My traffic has dipped down to weekend levels, and it's the middle of the week.
Could this be related to the breadcrumb microformats thing? I think it possibly could.
Perhaps other people who've experienced an unexpected nosedive in their views over the last day or two could also chime in here.
Another thing: I'd like to thank the HP members who bring stuff like this to our attention. I'd never heard of "breadcrumb microformats" before yesterday and would never have realised the possible impact that this latest lovely "improvement" could have on my traffic.
And yet another thing: If someone finds your hub on Google & clicks on the green breadcrumb link (rather than the blue link that leads direct to your hub), and then subsequently clicks on an ad in the contest page or whatever comes up in the green link, who gets the ad revenue?
I would be very, very interested to know the answer to that one.
by Shadaan Alam4 years ago
Hello all my fellow hubbers, hope you all are fine and enjoying your work!!This is my first forum topic and i hope i am able to explain myself well here- as to what i intend to ask you all.My question is: I read...
by Dr. John Anderson5 years ago
This issue has been raised many times in the past – but given the 20% drop in traffic it should be rectified urgently (good enough is no longer sufficient (IMO)Links to unrelated pages is something that Panda and...
by jellygator5 years ago
I submitted a hub about the difference between assertive and aggressive women called "She's such a Bitch: So Why Does He Love Her?" and I can't figure out exactly what's blocking it from publication.The bots...
by Ethan Green6 months ago
Since I joined HP there has been a constant battle against the rise and fall of traffic. We are often encouraged to tune our titles, edit our content and generally try to improve our Hubs. Now with the threat of having...
by Steve Andrews5 years ago
When it was first introduced I was annoyed by it but made an effort to tweak my hubs to get them out of Idle status. Now, a whole load have got zzs against them again and many of them are hubs that at one point were...
by Chuck Bluestein4 years ago
Now, not before, when you place a link, you have a choice to click rel=nofollow so that search engines ignore it. So in future hubs that you write or if you want to go back and edit, do not check this box for links to...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.