I took a test in a class and missed one question. When I took the test, I could see the answer going either way and I knew I could present a good argument for or against my answer. It was multiple choice, so I selected the one that I could present a stronger argument for.
I got the question wrong and I'm wondering if I should argue it w my prof. She doesn't seem to be too open to argument from questions other students ask. Should I try to present my side or just forget about it? It wouldn't greatly change my grade as it was the only one I got wrong. That said, that one point may help me further on in the semester if I slip below a perfect.
I've had that happen before too and didn't hesitate to speak with the prof afterwards in private to hear his reasoning and to present mine. Go for it, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain, whether you get the extra mark or learn something.
The sad reality. Academia is but a game. Play by the rules of the game (at this stage in your life. you look young and cute, I'm an old codger ) You progress to the next level, and perhaps it's there that you can afford to be a little more feisty. (sorry, sounds really cynical, I didn't mean it too.) Good luck, whatever you decide.
I take a more Carlinistic veiw...It's all about Ben Dover.
Never argue with your professor. You are setting yourself up for problems. An important skill that I see lacking in so many college students is the ability to deal with their instructors on an adult-to-adult basis. This could be a great opportunity to advance your skills in this area.
I have no intention of attacking her intelligence. I'm sure she's really smart, but I can explain why my selection could be right. If I'm wrong (which, obviously, I'm not 100% right because I DID get it wrong), it's fine if she can explain it to me. I just wish I'd written an explanation on the paper.
What further complicates things is that it's a speech course so we're being graded on how we speak, how we use persuasion, etc. Not that I'm being graded on a question I have about a test, but I don't want her to have a negative or even positive bias against me for asking. I especially don't want to come off whiny or ill-informed or just saying something dumb (I get nervous and it gets in the way of articulation.) She doesn't seem really open to people's ideas. When other students ask questions or share an opinion, she appears to have a "this is the way it is, deal with it" approach.
Maybe I should forget about it. It's just one point. I just feel like I'm letting myself down because I don't know if (or even how) I should approach this. I feel like it's a moot point, but at the same time, I think it's ultra important, even if I come out of it empty-handed (don't get that last point.)
Maybe you should do whatever it is you need to do to get through this stage in your education. However you're feeling and thinking, you can always express this at some later stage. Your professor sounds like a jobsworth, she should not be allowed the power to determine your future. If you do not obtain your qualifications, you will never be given the opportunity to pass on what you have learned. Get through this, if you ever become a lecturer, you will be so different.
Your professor seems to be rigid and dour, however, you only have one wrong answer and it really does not matter much, just like the charge of an electron which is so insignificant. Ignore the usual epigram teachers will quip: One mark can determine your A one or A two. They are hogwash. Given your professor's attitude, I advise you not to bicker over the marks.
Converse one-on-one after class as opposed to in class. Tell her why you did what you did. Accept her answer as opposed to debating it. Communication is a wonderful thing. Who knows? Maybe something serendipitous will come of it.
I can say from experience that arguing a point with a professor is a bad idea and will only damage egos. On the other hand, it wouldn't hurt to have a discussion with your professor to get some clarification on the question and demonstrate why you chose the answer you did. LOL I know its the same thing as arguing your point but it all comes down to presentation.
I like this advice, especially after reading melbel's explanation of the question.
It really wasn't a very good true/false question if you ask me. I would ask to speak with him after class.
I hate doing it, but whenever I feel the need to discuss/argue a question with a prof, I put on a bewildered dumb-blonde act. Sometimes you just gotta play the game, as degrading as it may be. I act innocent and confused and ask for an explanation first, and then say something like "Oh... what about this answer... is it possible for it to be like this...?"
Don't come across attacking or angry or frustrated. Just as a genuinely confused and humble student seeking the guidance of your superior teacher. If you stroke their ego, teachers can be surprisingly forgiving....
Is this thread unanimous or what!?!
melbel is going to buy us all dinner afterwards.
I'm going to have to agree with everyone else I suppose, ha. You'd be surprised what you can get into or out of with the power of persuasion and intelligent discussion.
Multiple choice tests are the graveyard of the truly intelligent.
Morons memorise yes/no answers as spoonfed to them in classes.
Intelligent people, who have read widely and way outside the range of predigested lecture material as well as thought things through for themselves, find multiple choice difficult; they wish to answer many questions with a "yes, but", "no, but", "depending on circumstances, it could be either" type of answer.
Unless you know whether your teacher is producing MCQ tests purely for convenience or because he/she belongs to the moron group, there is little point in arguing.
Thank goodness for that !! I find multiple choice questions impossible to answer and had accepted that I am just a moron, now I know it is because I am too bright for them ! You couldn't drop a short note to that effect to my wife, who lost patience with me proof-reading her English tests, could you - please tick either YES NO NOT GIVEN
Ask him/her about it, rather than pushing a case. Nothing to be lost doing that.
I have no right to comment, not being privy to the American system, but I would argue. If there isn't a yes/no answer, then you can't be wrong. Every opinion, whether the professor hears it or not, has the right to be heard.
When I was lecturing I gave credit for ambiguous answers all the time. But someone does have to tell you about it.
I was thinking about what Nouveau Skeptic said about there being a right answer and a wrong answer.
Usually, in that case, one answer is learned and the other is either guessed at, conjecture or downright lies.
Or it could be a brand new solution to an age old problem.
Without knowing what Melbel is studying, but guessing it might be to do with software development, I'd be interested in hearing the question itself, not the speculation of what one might do in an abstract situation.
It's a question of ethics. We weren't allowed to keep the test or record anything from it, but it was like,
"When composing a speech, the writer must adhere to a written code of ethics."
True or False
(I picked false. The correct answer was true.)
The word "written" is what bothered me. The book both refers to 'code of ethics' but doesn't say "The 10 Commandments" or "Big Joe's Big Book of Ethics." It makes zero reference to a specific written work of ethics.
Furthermore, the Chapter states that, "Your ethical decisions will be guided by your values." This is what I believe. I don't need some written guidelines of ethics, values, and morals to tell me what I SHOULD believe. I AM influenced by the world around me, but the world around me does not have the final say on what I believe. I selected false because that's what felt right for me.
I knew, taking the test that it was a 50/50, but I can't defend that it's a "written code of ethics", I CAN defend that it should be based on my own values.
Well, I would not have had a clue if asked that question!
I was never taught there were ethics when it came to speech-making. maybe a few politicians could learn something here!
Speech-making to my mind is all about putting your point across as forcefully and coherently as you can, without shouting, obviously.
If this exam is important to you, I would write down my objections as clearly and succinctly as I could, and present them to my teacher/examiner/whoever.
I think there is no right and wrong answer here.
Or maybe I am not educated enough.
Score off that last comment!
Ah, I see now! I have come across organisations, which recommend or require their members to produce a personal code of ethics written in their own words concerning activities relevant to that organisation. It is possible that in some subjects of study, teachers might also mention having such a document as being desirable. I think the idea is that if you write it yourself, you are forced to think through the issues, whereas if you simply put your signature to an existing document, you might do so even without bothering to read it.
Sorry, but I would have to agree with the prof on that one.
Most likely the prof is referring to common speech codes that prevent libel, slander, harassment, etc.
What the book refers to is a wide range of ethical issues. Some are more concrete and obvious like "don't stab your friends", "don't spew racial slurs", etc... but some are more fluid and are the things that change over time. And even in that realm, the book refers to personal ethics being a guiding hand versus a list of hard-written rules.
I mean, isn't it the purpose of education to learn HOW to think and not WHAT to think? If our ethics were right out of some book or list of some person's guidelines, wouldn't our society NEVER change?
For example, look at the 1920s, then it was acceptable to call African-Americans whatever and refer to them as animals, people who were stupid and couldn't think. Now, we know that not only is that HORRIBLY wrong, but that we can't just go around treating people like that.
Just some thoughts.
Furthermore, if I DO write my own ethical guidelines, what if they change? I could edit them, but wouldn't that prove that our ethics are more fluid than concrete?
I mean, yeah, being ethical is important, but the question was really poorly worded.
It reminds me of losing the Geography Bowl in 8th grade to:
"Birds migrate from Canada to the US and what neighboring country?"
I answered Greenland. The answer was Mexico. I didn't think Greenland really made sense. I KNEW birds went South, but I thought the judge meant "a country neighboring Canada" and Greenland is what came to mind.
When I have a conundrum such as this, I usually ask myself - what is my goal - what do I hope to gain...what happens if it is recieved wrong? Risk vs. Reward is usually my decider:) Good luck!
What conundrum? Bird fly south. Is anything further north than Greenland?
Conundrum - meaning she has a confused situation she is pondering...I totally must have misunderstood the question! EXCUSE ME!!!!
Oh I see:)
Sorry when you quoted her 'birds fly south' post, I thought you were replying to that.
Oh no - I don't venture out on the forums much - I only did because Mel linked it...so I probably am responding in the wrong place. Thanks for the heads up:)
Well, I didn't know until I was 42 that Greenland was even near Canada, so you did well
(just joking, trying to make you feel better)
There is no question about the fact that you were right to answer false. What is your teacher, a fascist or a communist? One of the two, certainly, on the face of things!
If I were you, I would stand by my principals and argue my point (even though you made it by mistake). It may well be that your teacher is testing your resolve to challenge her "authority" and that your respectful challenge will score you points.
When composing a speech, no writer must adhere to any code of ethics. They should adhere to a code of decency in terms of their language, so as not to cause pointless or unnecessary offence; but the entire point of making any speech is to advance an opinion and promote it to the relevant audience. A speech is an attempt at education of the masses, a gallant gushing from the heart and soul that will hopefully prove to be to the benefit of society as a whole.
Good luck with your ongoing education...
If her doors are open for constructive engagement, i would have love to say yes. But if you see her in good mood, you can start a discussion with her on different issue entirely, study her and see that she's responding positively. Then present your case in a kindly manner.
You can always tell her why you picked the answer verses an argument of what is correct. Perhaps she will explain the reason for the correct answer. Some answers are text book and not in context to what the subject or the modern day belief of the subject is. How many principles fly in the face of many early facts because they were only theories to begin with. How many unmovable beliefs have come into arguments of different possible interpretations and even results can be skewed.
by Penny Godfirnon 9 years ago
What causes some people to argue for the sake of arguing ?Has anyone heard of a mental disorder that causes people to argue even though they have been proven wrong or know they are wrong, just for the sake of arguing.
by Martie Coetser 13 years ago
Have you noticed that it is only Christians who constantly argue about God and his will? Why do members of other religions have a consentaneous interpretation of the Creator and his will?
by Sandra Greaney 9 years ago
If someone argues with you, but apologises the next day, should you forgive them?Something was misunderstood & this caused irritation, which then led to argument.
by GDiBiase 11 years ago
Do you think it is best to argue or just walk away?
by Joshua Zerbini 11 years ago
Why do Christians tend to argue with non-believers? What are they trying to prove?II Timothty 2:23-23 states, "Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach,...
by Faith Reaper 10 years ago
Why do you think serial killers go unnoticed for so long?It is so strange to me that serial killers in most cases go so long without being noticed, why do you think that seems to be the case?
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|