I did see a slight rise in traffic last week, somewhere around ten percent. I'm hoping that it will be built upon this week.
A big surge would be preferable, of course, but a slow recovery would be better than nothing after the desperate times we've been experiencing.
It's creeping up slowly for me, but not as fast as previous years. And traffic is one half and impressions one third of what they were last year, plus CPM is lower.
I wouldn't dispute that the situation is dire.
This month's payout will be one of the worst ever and it's for a December! The payout next month will be even lower... I can't even find the effing words!
Medium seems to be in dire straits too, although for completely different reasons to HP. According to SEM Rush, Medium traffic has fallen by 2/3 in the previous year!
So who's getting all the traffic or have people become lethargic as regards Googling stuff and reading? Maybe it's a case of planet-wide, post-COVID exhaustion?
As an experiment, I've made a slideshow YouTube teaser to see if I can get traffic to one of my troubleshooting guides.
The last time I looked at the internet, there were a multitude of alternative reading options if someone doesn't like Medium, or HP for that matter. I don't believe that reader numbers are down overall across the English-speaking world.
I'm sometimes unsure if Medium is really doing anything unique or if it's just Blogger with an earnings program.
Another problem for Coach Tony is that I don't think he has all the dollars to pump into Medium that Ev Williams had. If he started dishing out $500 bonuses, there would be people flooding back.
Traffic levels seem to be stuck. Little evidence of a continued slow recovery.
Yes, I see that too. Last year I was getting 800 extra views per week at this time, now it's maybe 10 or 15.
I'm probably missing around 3000 compared to last year.
Yes, it's going down, worse than last week! FFS!
Although there was maintenance again. I wonder whether that affects reporting.
Dire income levels again this month. A person might think Maven/Arena, (or whatever they're calling themselves this week), would have the sense to realise their policies are not working. When this site was Hubpages proper, my income was fine. Now I'm pondering deleting the site as a waste of my time.
You seem to be under the misapprehension that we and Maven/TAG are in the same boat. In our dingy, we get paid 60% of one pageview.
They, on the other hand, get 25-29 times what we earn. And if revenues decrease, they can just increase the ad frequency to improve their earnings.
So for every $5 an author earns here, they have the potential to earn $100-150, if readers will slog through all the ads. And if at the end they click on a click bait article who knows what that earns HP.
It looks like Google wants to eliminate companies by repeated downranking.
Yeah, I've given up on the search engines for the time being. I think whatever the issues are, we individual writers are essentially powerless right now.
I'm working on knocking my Pinterest into shape. I'll keep editing and improving existing hubs, of course.
I do wish that HP would tell us more about what's going on and their response. Nobody stepped into Paul E's shoes after he left, regarding communication, so we're always having to speculate.
It can feel like we're left to stumble around in the dark.
Rather than improving, traffic levels are drifting downwards if anything. So depressing.
Mine isn't falling, but barely increasing and at a slower rate than last year, so the overall trend is a fall for the last few years.
The latest Google update is focused on Amazon hubs. It's effing brutal but won't affect hubbers unless they have product articles.
It's affected my accounts with Amazon articles badly, but the others seem unscathed.
Another reason for me to focus on Pinterest for now!
Is Pinterest still a thing? I don't know personally, but I thought all the cool kids went to Instagram, then to this Tik Tok thing. I don't follow it much, but you may want to look into it before putting in the work.
The unfortunate thing about Instagram is that backlinks can't be added to posts. You can add the link, but a viewer would have to copy and paste the link into their browser to follow it. A hyperlink can be added to your profile.
Pinterest works for me. It's in my #2 spot for Traffic Sources.
There must be another update because traffic is 20% down on last week. It looks like Google is going to chip away chunks until there's nothing left of sites.
Rather than one big panda mauling, it's death by a thousand cuts!
For the first time, abysmal earnings are making me ask myself how soon I should start unpublishing articles that have zero views and start putting them somewhere else. I'm happy to leave the articles that generate most earnings for the passive income until the end. But it feels like it's time to start addressing the elephant in the room. It's sad but I'm being practical and realistic at this point.
Earnings are hilarious right now. Well, if I didn't laugh, I'd cry, so choosing to see the funny side. Haven't been this low since the end of the Apprentice scheme.
I have the same point of view. It's tough. I don't understand why HP doesn't make an overall announcement about what is happening and their plan to rectify it.
The radio silence is ominous. It makes me wonder if they don't care, if they don't really have a plan, or if they're somehow unaware of how bad this is for writers. Perhaps they're cautious to say anything because they don't have a clear plan.
I don't have an optimistic lens though.
From the staff list, there seems to be only maintenance people and editors/managing editors who keep the site ticking over, but maybe not everyone is listed. So perhaps all direction and marketing is done centrally by TAG, but they don't talk to anyone from my experience of asking them about things.
I definitely think the problem comes from the TAG side.
Made payout just by the skin of my teeth! This is getting crazy!
I used to make payout in 27 hours. Now it can take up to 8 days for that to occur. HP was an important part of my income stream, and when it fell off the map in September, along with several personal tragedies at home, I was left scrambling for new sources of income, as the pandemic and tariffs have slowly chipped away at my other pet supplies business.
I am confident that my thoughts on the subject of TAG and their "plans" for us are very unpopular. You could call them conversation killers. Never the less, since folks seem to be leaning in my direction a bit, I will repeat myself.
TAG has no plan for us. I actually think the management at Arena resents us and our trailing commissions, when they would much rather pay English-as-a-second-language folks to write reviews or "news" and have editors clean them up. $ 10-15 bucks an article and they are done with the cost for that.
Right now TAG stuffs ads into our articles at approximately twice the rate they do on Sports Illustrated. They apparently know the difference between tempting readers and suffocating readers.
TAG make 25-30 times we do for each read, depending on the length of the article. They are okay with that, and if they need more, they will add more ads.
We can add content to CrimeWire in the beginning for a meager return. But I don't think that the arrangement Paul and Paul setup originally to share equitably with the writers is anything the Arena folks want to repeat or even continue.
The new, oblique terms state we get paid 60% of a pageview. All other impression earnings plus 40%of that first impression goes to TAG. Not to make HP flourish, but to pay the bills for their flagship properties Sports Illustrated, The Street and Parade. They want those to flourish at all costs. They see those properties and other acquisitions as the future.
Traffic seems to be down today. Semrush is reporting increased volatility.
My traffic has been pretty constant recently. Neither down nor up. Just crap.
I've gone down slightly... I've lost about 200 daily views. Numbers overall are horrible.
I wonder is everyone using an electric lawn mower to cut their grass now or do they just not fix things? This troubleshooting guide gets less than 150 views a day peak now. I don't think I'll bother updating any articles this year to get a 2023 date because it seems to be a waste of time. There's nothing more I can add to guides anyway.
I think it's just HP and where Google has placed our articles. I use to have articles that would get 1,000 daily views, or even 500... it's rare now to have one that's pulling in 100.
Yeah, it's a rankings issue.
I would still keep editing at least once/year. Even if the edit made is trivial, it's necessary for freshness, I believe. That said, HP have recently been through pretty much everything (they seem to be on Turbofuture now).
My focus at the moment is driving traffic from other places, as well as trying some other strategies. I've more or less given up on search engine traffic to my HP articles improving in the near future.
It was an unpleasant surprise to log in today and see the drop in traffic. I hope it will recover again soon. I don't know why those updates always hurt us so badly.
It's as though Google want to eliminate sites by chipping away at them until they give up.
Yes, we're now past mid-Feb. Things should be starting to get a little better purely from seasonal factors, but instead, traffic's getting worse.
HP's still pushing for trying to improve the site(s) generally with editing and advice (e.g. latest newsletter), but that doesn't seem to be enough.
For sure, it can take months for improvements to reap rewards with the algo but a majority of a year has gone by since the editors went through Owlcation and Google still seems unhappy.
I used to say: "maybe low traffic is the new norm" but the new norm now appears to be slowly dying. I would be happy with just the crappy traffic and earnings of a year ago at this stage.
There is a saying in bodybuilding that goes: "You can't out-train a bad diet."
Maybe the HP version of this is: "You can't out-edit a bad user experience."
Until they fix the ad issues, I don't see how all the editing and updating in the world helps.
This is an accurate summation of the situation.
The sad thing is that I really want to write more here, but it's difficult to justify the time and effort if my views and earnings are going to drop lower regardless.
There was a time not that long ago when I felt that I was at least treading water, but that algo hit near the end of last year was a big one.
We've had a few crushing blows and a multitude of smaller ones. It's so dispiriting and there's currently no sign that it's going to end.
The only thing that seems to work, which is entirely unpredictable, is to write in a way that Android Google picks up your content. The surges from that tend to bring in nice earnings. I noticed it only happens for me with brand-new content, but it's hard to predict what will actually get picked up.
For me, it seems to be DenGarden articles that Android Google likes.
Other than that, I think writing only for the niches that have the highest traffic is the best way to keep things afloat. Owlcation, DenGarden, Pethelpful, and Spinditty seem to be the strongest ones. Every once in a while, I update a spreadsheet of traffic numbers based off Semrush.
I agree 100% with you, Eric. I have little to no incentive to write on this platform anymore with things as they are. It's just not worth my time.
This seed sowing guide is running at about 70% less traffic than last year, with practically no growth. The same for all Dengarden guides. I'm not sure who speculated about it, maybe Paul, but perhaps the way Google works is they only allow articles to be in the limelight for so many years then they're effectively dumped, no matter how much they're improved or how good the quality.
I think that's the overall trend recently.
SEM Rush generally shows the main niches as being in slow decline over the past few months.
SEM Rush authority scores for HP niches haven't improved. Ironically, Medium has a good score, despite large amounts of spurious health and financial advice. It doesn't seem to help Medium much though.
I'm not sure whether Google dumps older articles or not. I do think Eric is right that if a website has a bad user experience, there is nothing you can really do as a writer to work around that. Until the user experience is enjoyable for the niches, HP writers are going to struggle.
Another new week but traffic and earnings are as dismal as ever. I was actually getting more views a month ago.
Mine is up a bit this week, reaching mid November levels. Probably a home & garden surge. Still 40% down on last year though.
When I look at my top-earning articles, many of them sit at around #3 in the rankings. That sounds great and would be if they hadn't been at #1 at one point. You can lose around half the traffic with each ranking drop.
My earnings are simply a joke nowadays. Perhaps the only saving grace of this site is that the earnings are (to some degree) passive. Medium's worse in that the site's lost 2/3 of its traffic but the writers still have to run around on the hamster wheel for their diminishing returns.
Medium is dire for me at the moment. Probably because I can't be bothered to avail myself of the hamster wheel
My peak was $800 in a month, but now, phlumppp.
And that's the very reason why I gamble my time here on Hubpages and not Medium.
Of course, as soon as I moaned about the traffic earlier in the week, there was a new algo product update straight after. It gave me another 5-10% on this account.
That's really just clawing back what was lost at the last update and not life-changing. Essentially, I would need my traffic to double to get back to anywhere near what it was a couple of years back.
My traffic is down a bit today, but it generally peaks on a Wednesday anyway for educational stuff. I guess Thursday and Friday are lazy days in school and college.
It's a product reviews update. So one wouldn't necessarily expect a big impact on educational articles.
Traffic seems to be down a good bit today. There appeared to be an update on Thursday.
Yeah, it just keeps coming down along with the earnings. We’re still a sinking ship, it seems.
Normal Friday for me on this account.
Updates vary in their timing, though. I have ten accounts and there can be days between the effects on them.
We need either a big, benign boost or a sustained period of gradual gains. We've not seen anything like that for two years. On the contrary, we've had several major drops and lots of minor ones.
Don't expect any different, especially with the influx of AI generated content.
AI is definitely a serious issue and not just here but overall... I hope adequate steps are taken to minimize AI content as much as possible. Fingers crossed for better times.
AI is super useful as a writing aid. I'm discovering more uses for it all the time. The problem is when people just copy and paste the entire answer without any additional work to fact-check, and edit the language and structure. It creates articles that can be problematic and they're not easy to filter out.
There's a much bigger problem though. The system we've got used to, whereby people type something into a search engine and then get a bunch of websites to choose from is under threat.
The whole idea of search engines and websites and the business models that go along with them won't last long if the AI system is adopted, where people just ask a question and then an answer is generated by AI.
The threats are multiple and I think certain forms of (human) writing might be doomed, unfortunately.
AI helps give information about a topic but does not give the source. Once it does that, then we'll see some significant changes.
As far as the filtering goes. At present, HP has two layers of protection that articles have to get through.
The first layer uses software to weed out material that blatantly breaches rules (eg plagiarism) and/or is so obviously low quality that a computer can spot it.
The second layer uses human editors to assess what is good enough to go in the niches.
While the humans will still stop crap going into the niches, I suspect that the amount of stuff making it passed the software stage will now be absolutely huge, because most of the AI stuff won't be stopped by the current software.
It's the sheer volume of AI-generated material that will likely be problematic for HP, I suspect.
Coders will write code to assess and qualify AI.
There will certainly be an arms race but AI generates unique new material that is written in good English. It's already very close to indistinguishable.
There are a few patterns in the way that, say, ChatGPT currently expresses certain things, but those will likely disappear quickly.
Ultimately, the only thing that AI maybe won't be able to generate is a genuine sense of soul, personality, or consciousness. However, other AI won't be able to detect that.
HP doesn't really have to detect AI anyway. If something's of sufficient written quality, they can let it through regardless. The only problem then becomes the veracity of the content.
I think you tapped into an important topic. Of course, if one would only use AI as an inspiration and direction in its writing, then maybe it wouldn't be such an issue since it would still be the "human behind the keyboard" who would be the deciding figure.
But I think I know people way too well and their drive to make things as easy for themselves as far as it allows them to. If you give people one finger, they take the whole hand.
That's just how it works, which means that people won't only use it as a helpful tool but will make it work for them with time, and that's the point I am so worried about.
Technology was meant to make our lives easier, not replace human creation.
Writers could still hold an upper position if they attest their work is fully human-created. Like hand-made and organic goods, it could be a selling point for search engines.
I hope you're right about that. Let's hope for the best!
Hmm, how did the market for human-created clothing go after mass-produced manufacturing arrived?
Certain types of writing will be okay, I would think, such as opinion pieces and creative works, but I'm struggling to see how a lot of general info-based writing will be able to hold its head above water in the future.
Search engines and websites seem like they might be threatened by AI too.
I hope I'm wrong, but I think writing articles could go like music, where all the money is sucked out of it. You can still make music and sell it but the value sank to almost nothing (in most cases) following digitalization.
I've actually been writing a few articles with help from AI recently. But I think people may start going straight to the AI at some point for their info.
We're at an inflection point, I believe. However, it's impossible to predict exactly how it's going to go. For example, nobody really predicted that texting would become a thing when mobile phones became popular. Technology can have unexpected consequences.
You have a good point. I have found AI helpful in finding new ways to express an idea or look at a topic differently. It will never write the article for me.
AI is not sentient. Luckily, that separates us from electronically generated content.
I am really talking specifically about writing for an income.
I am also looking to the future, rather than focusing on the now. What's likely to happen over the next five or ten years.
We're moving from a situation where AI is basically functioning as a writing aid, for example, Grammarly, to where AI actually becomes the writer, for example, ChatGPT.
It's important not to confuse the influence of AI on the actual writing with the effects of AI on the writing and publishing industries. I am really more focused on the latter and what it means for writers who rely on their words for an income source.
But you do realize that AI will create an attestation for you to include at the end of the article so that your readers will be sure that it is human-created?
Many of my hubs are likely going to be hybrids from hereon. My intention is to write about what I know and fact-check. Whether others will be so scrupulous, I'm not so sure.
AI is the perfect tool for bullsh*tters!
My own feeling is that sites will have to rely more on *who* is writing the articles. Publishing something by a complete unknown seems much riskier now. It's easier to produce something that appears convincing, even when it might be inaccurate.
It feels like the internet might be entering another one of its "Wild West" periods!
My traffic is up, more than it has been in a long time. Fingers crossed for a continued upward trend. Anyone else?
None of my accounts have changed much, aside from one which is getting a lot of MSN traffic to one particular article.
Are you seeing a rise in traffic across all of your articles, Jan, or is it focused on a particular niche or niches?
Yes. I am up. Better than last month. Fingers crossed!
Up 8% for Monday compared to the previous Monday.
According to Search Engine Roundtable, the Google Products Update is causing a lot of volatility around the web.
Just not much for me at the moment, though.
My traffic's barely any different from what it was last Monday on this account.
I'm still not seeing much difference on HP stats.
If I go to GA for this account, then it looks like +11% for yesterday over last Monday. However, that seems to be because of an irregular dip last week, rather than a rise this Monday. Today, GA is showing -4.5%.
My overall feeling is that there's just some turbulence happening, rather than any real gains, but I hope I'm wrong. It's impossible to judge accurately from just a couple of days of stats.
I can't see other people's stats so maybe I'm an aberration, but looking through all my accounts, mine don't appear to have improved.
What is weird is Amazon product review sites. A few of mine are doing fine, but many have dipped almost out of existence. That's where the real turbulence seems to be for me. It's also a major cause of my loss of earnings.
I'll have to watch over the next few days and weeks to see, Paul. Your analysis is probably correct based on the trends. We can only hope. Maybe the little bump on Owlcation is due to college study at this time of the year.
Generally speaking, the trend over the past few months for me has been my traffic being pushed flat at a low level, like it's been sat on by an elephant(!)
I have a Bellatory piece doing super well. The others are up too.
I’m at my lowest. No change seen here. Only occasionally a bump from Google Android.
I'm still getting some bumps from sources like android, MSN, etc. but the sad thing is that they're nowhere near as dramatic as they were last year.
I'm still hoping to drive some traffic from Pinterest but although I'm getting thousands of impressions now, there's not much more actual traffic.
I've taken a break from Pinterest for the meantime. I've been slowly rehauling pictures on here. Looks like HP is going to be changing cover pictures based on another forum thread.
I only get bumps with Android for brand-new content. One bump made February about $100 better than January, so I'll take it. Otherwise, the earnings and traffic are all very low. It would need to jump about 6,000-7,000 daily views for me to say there has been a rebound. It's been a downward trend since September.
Glad to see some people are seeing an uptick, and sometimes my account is slow to adjust to changes in traffic.
Today, Wednesday's update seems to be pulling down traffic again.
It's difficult. I think all that can be concluded at present is that there's some volatility happening.
Every Wednesday, I get ten newsletters from HP, one for each account.
The most recent one showed some accounts up five or ten percent, some down five or ten percent, and some hovering around zero.
I interpret that as not much overall change in recent times.
If I only had one account and it showed a rise of ten percent, I'd think things were going well. If I had one of the accounts that showed a ten percent fall, I'd think things were going badly.
Even with ten accounts, it's difficult to figure out what's going on day-to-day when things are so tempestuous.
I guess I'm reserving any judgments until the dust settles. Maybe we'll have some vague idea by the weekend.
According to GA, the traffic for this account that I'm writing with wavered around for a couple of days and now it's back at the same level it was a week ago!
I'm thinking it was turbulence earlier in the week with little or no long-term effects on viewing numbers.
Traffic should really be creeping up now that we're into March. It all feels fairly stagnant to me apart from the waves a few days ago.
I'm just after taking a look at my 2020 traffic and this year's is actually at the same level (there's a phase shift in the graph because I didn't adjust for the days of the week to be the same) I know I've probably got more articles since 2020, but they haven't been terrible prosperous in terms of views. I think the higher traffic for 2021 and 2022 probably spoiled us.
I think you're confirming the stagnancy that I've experienced too.
I don't think I was "spoiled." I had just 5 months of good traffic in '21 and things have been dismal ever since.
Before that, there was another barren period lasting 18 months.
The site hasn't been good in any sort of sustained way since 2018/19, which increasingly feels like ancient history.
2018/19 was good for me, anyway, as Amazon was still a big earner back then.
For earnings generally, I can't really remember anything so dire for many years. It really doesn't feel like it's worth the effort.
That said, I have produced a few new articles, partly to experiment with AI and partly to experiment with Pinterest.
I don't see the new articles making any difference to my earnings. It's just pennies.
If we made your data statistics appear vertically, you would have what almost looks like a DNA strand.
Even though I'm publishing more, traffic is still falling. It seems to be a waste of time.
I still want to believe that it will turn around one day. I guess the hope is what drives me forward to continue writing here.
In the background, there are also changes coming down the pipeline brought by AI that will likely have a profound effect.
HP are putting out mixed messages with their fixes in some ways.
On the one hand, the editors are putting in lots of hard work to improve the quality of articles in the niches, which is presumably aimed directly at the search engines.
On the other hand, introducing the Rojo chatting seems to be pushing the site in a different and new direction.
I don't know that editing an article for the 12th time is hard work, or that it produces much if any benefit.
Rojo is taking the site in a new direct as are the "News" articles from TikTok. TikTok pays for views to new videos to those with large followings like any other content site. HP invites users to upload their own videos to HP, and HP will share these videos on their TikTok and Instagram accounts.
Free videos, for them to enrich HP on. RoJo, I assume, is there to further this aim. It is indeed a new direction for HP, and one that has little to no focus on the writers here, with the exception of Delishably.
The stagnation continues, but no volatility on the Semrush graph. Stagnation implies traffic fall in real terms, considering it should be rising at this time of year for me.
Feb/March '21 was during the 5 month "bliss period,".so it's a comparison of best and worst, in some ways. But still... It's sad how things have gone.
When things first began to go downhill 20 months or so ago, I thought the site might be able to bounce back relatively quickly. Instead, things just got worse.
Meanwhile traffic to this physics article has increased, maybe because it has a thumbnail in the featured snippet alongside a few other images. Google won't give me a SERP result because Ray already has a similar article.
I have one or two that have bucked the trend. I can't figure out why. I've tried tampering with others to make them more like the anomalies.
Of course, the success may just be to do with changes to the algo punishing rivals and the hub doing better that way. If rivals sink, you do better.
I've also been looking at what HP editors have been doing in Pethelpful with images and layout.
There was a 10% drop in traffic yesterday, no evidence of an update from Semrush. What's going on? Traffic still down by the hour today.
I don't know. I don't tend to get too concerned with day-to-day fluctuations unless they're huge.
My traffic's pretty normal according to Google Analytics. That's "normal" in the sense of being crappy.
It could be a Spring Break/Easter Holidays thing that's affecting you. It doesn't seem like a change to Google.
Traffic is down a bit this afternoon (Thursday) because of the latest major Google core update.
https://www.seroundtable.com/
Yeah, I think this one is bad. It’s actually impressive how bad my traffic is today.
It's difficult for me to assess. I've got a few individual hubs in various accounts surging dramatically, which tends to skew the overall figures. I'd just say there's some turbulence going on.
The last update, there was turbulence followed by a return to stagnancy. It's difficult to predict what will happen with this one. Rollouts can also last longer than they used to, weeks rather than days.
I’ve been progressively losing traffic since September. I’m down about 7,000 daily views now. I’m not very optimistic about a recovery anymore. I occasionally get a surge on an article and that’s about the only thing that’s keeping me going. SemRush for all the niches has been showing consistent downward trends.
It would be great for things to improve, but I suspect Google wants a very specific way for its navigation.
Perhaps there will be a wild twist when this new update is fully out in the next couple of weeks… it doesn’t seem like it though.
The previous core updates, certainly over the past 20 months or so, have affected us negatively. However, it's too early to draw any conclusions about this one.
Search Engine Round Table said something similar to what I was thinking:
"Remember, these updates can take about two weeks to roll out, and sometimes, the changes you see within the first few days are not where things stick. So be patient and wait for the roll-out to complete before panicking."
At the moment both my views and earnings are up 50% for this account. I expect that to be temporary, though, as it's due to one article surging.
Generally speaking, I share the sense of gloom.
I welcome the recent initiatives by HP to generate traffic. However, it could also be interpreted as them looking for alternative sources of traffic. In the past, for me, search engines were the only source that supplied sustained and substantial levels of traffic.
I like seeing that HubPages is at least trying to make changes. I have a hard time not being skeptical of some of the experiments. Some of them I think just need to be fleshed out better. Other experiments I think they've taken things in the wrong direction. I'm hoping eventually they'll find something that really does have a positive impact.
The odd thing about this seed sowing guide is that I'm down 90% in traffic, yet I have two featured snippet photos. Maybe I need to change them. Meanwhile the guide that gets the text featured snippet doesn't have any photos to accompany it, so it's time to give a bad feedback review to Google for what it's worth.
Is it possible that the drop in traffic is because of it losing traffic from related keywords rather than anything to do with the snippet photos?
If you're still getting featured snippets, the main keyword might be doing okay but the related keywords are in the dumps.
Most of my articles that do really well actually get more traffic from the related keywords than the main one.
So when the related keyword traffic goes down, the article loses most of its views, despite maintaining ranking for the main keyword.
I don't know. I'm just putting it out there.
I've seen you guys talking about surges before. I've just had one where a five year old article with a typical view count of about 30 a day out of the blue peaked out at about 1800 views/1400/750 over three days and now back to normal. That wasn't due to any editing on my behalf - I haven't touched it for years.
But the question is have you ever analysed why this could happen? I'm sure you have but have you then found enough answers that you've been able to maintain the surge, or, even better, start a surge? Cheers
Often this is referral spam where a false source is listed to get someone who is analysing their traffic to visit the source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referrer_spam
The reasons for why a surge happens relates to the source of the traffic. There is no one, universal reason.
The cause can be spammy like Eugene says but there can also be legit reasons.
For example: getting featured by MSN on their page can give you hundreds or thousands of extra views for a time.
Google will also often boost traffic around algo updates to test out pages and sites.
The most common time to get a surge is just after an article is published but it can potentially happen at any point.
I sometimes try editing articles to try to get them to surge. The jury's out on how successful that tactic is.
Yeah if only you could contact the spammers to say 'pick me - pick me.'
I've had it happen a couple times, Jerry. It's usually for the MSN reason that Paul cites or that new thing HP is doing with news stories that link back to your article. You can't control it, or make it repeat, it just happens. Enjoy it while it lasts. And the extra coins, too.
Yeah - back to normal sadly. But I knew something was up when there was no more than two or three Amazon clicks a day on the surge up to 1800 views - same as a typical 30 views a day. If this happens to most on HP from time to time it must be pretty costly for them with no real ad clicks, or maybe they bill the advertiser for the surges
I often wonder does editing articles too frequently piss off the the Google webcrawlers and put the articles on some sort of blacklist for wasting Google's resources. I've edited some articles hundreds of times. However, articles can no longer be force crawled, except by site owners, and I think they now just visit every so often, so maybe it's not an issue.
I doubt that it gets you blacklisted. Although "hundreds of times" does sound a little, urm, obsessive!
I normally edit a few times/year at most. At my most intense, it's still maybe only two or three times a month.
I have a handful of articles that have surged multiple times. Usually, they earn me not much more than the price of a coffee, though.
Of course, the other side of surges is that they can provide the potential for garnering more backlinks and improving SEO.
Well, the goodly gnomes in the editorial department have been zooming through my PH articles, with minor updates to almost all of them. One article, that has been out there for over a decade, still had a shameful typo in it. The horror. Thanks for finding and fixing it.
The net result is a 50% increase in traffic and earnings. That is encouraging for the moment, but I wonder how long it will last. Were the increases due to corrections in the Google Algo update rollout or the edits. I wish I knew.
I'm struggling to discern what effect, if any, this latest Google algo update is having. Some of my accounts seem to be doing slightly better. Others seem to be suffering.
Maybe that's a sign that not much has really happened.
Of course, the real change could come toward the end of the rollout. We've experienced "stings in the tail" before now. I don't feel a great deal of hope but surely we can't just keep sinking, there has to be some sort of respite or improvement at some point?
I just lost a photo snippet for a physics guide. Google won't rank it because of Site Diversity and a similar article on Owlcation, so traffic has dropped hugely as a result. What's annoying is that traffic was actually growing for this guide, now it's back to square one.
That sucks; is it a quality article that is on a different topic from yours? Can you change the title to make it a little more different from the other article.
It's pretty much about the same thing, but more recent than mine. Mine is 10 years old, but it was about a variety of related topics in a particular field of physics. I split up the article into four articles and this article was what remained. I can't really change the title, just add extra keywords.
I would say that is further evidence that Google prefers fresh articles to revamped ones. How are the other articles you spun off doing?
Not doing well. Typically from zero to a few views per day.
So much for evergreen articles, then. Do you think they've lost their value?
Probably, Google is fickle and dumps quality content when the new cool stuff appears, even though it's often of lesser quality.
From the moment TAG introduced their horrendous ad placement regime our articles have lost value yes Jan; there's no doubt Google sees the whole package as low status. Long-term side effects? Anyone's guess.
I'm still writing fresh material for Owlcation, albeit at a slower rate, and have noticed quite a mild leap in impressions and earnings the last few days since they introduced the new video?
Overall the outlook is gloomy, not so much doomy.
On the subject of AI - I personally wouldn't touch it with a proverbial bargepole! It's here to stay that's a no-brainer but at this moment in time I'm keeping well away. I'm a purist I guess. I don't want artificially generated prose undermining the creative impulse. Give me the human touch every time. Does that make me a dinosaur....?
It doesn't make you a dinosaur. I am 23 years old, and I totally agree with you. It's a scary development, and it isn't beneficial for humanity.
Where it can save lives, where it's necessary for us to evolve – fine, go ahead. But don't let AI take away people's jobs because today's economic model, as it is now, isn't ready to provide for it.
The ones who support AI should also find a solution to how it will work out with less labor force needed when the population continues to expand. I am so curious to hear.
I'll be a dinosaur with you, Andrew. Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
I think they like certain things for a while, then abandon them for some new trick. For instance, I have seen articles full of inaccurate information, but ranking well, because they have quick and easy comparison charts. Google likes them, so if you can find a way to insert them (Topic: Pros, Cons for example) do so about midway or towards the bottom. This will change when some new technique comes along.
They liked bullet points a lot before, but charts are preferred now, in my humble opinion.
I slightly changed the title image on this and added a couple more items and a few extra words to the infographic. Nothing major. I'm exploring the possibility that Google had some issue with OCR or it didn't like the extra detail and that's why it dumped the image. So I've changed back to the original one. Maybe they only like images with little going on in them.
A 16% drop in traffic yesterday for some reason. Probably because of Easter.
Same here. The bunny rabbit is busy, and churches are open.
Weekly traffic since the start of the year. This shows the stagnation with no improvement.
This is for the same period in 2019 with 44 less articles. Traffic by the first week in April was already double what it is in 2023. So I guess due to a combination of downranking of sites and dumping of evergreen articles by Google.
by Claudia Porter 4 years ago
Am I the only one seeing a fairly significant drop in earnings from Sunday, 9/20 to Monday, 9/21? My traffic stayed relatively the same during the same time.
by Eugene Brennan 5 years ago
According to @searchliaison on TwitterThey don't usually tell us beforehand?
by Rosheda Stephenson 4 years ago
I have seen a huge drop in both views and CPM for the past 2 to 3 months. I write mostly travel related articles so this was expected. However the drop is so steep that I am wondering if something else could be going on (i.e if it could be more than just people not planning or reading about...
by Ben G 13 years ago
I'm curious to see how long I can expect to be in the depths of Google's sandbox.I've noticed that people rise and fall in waves, depending on when you switched over to the subdomains, so I want to get a general idea as to how long most people are stuck in the sandbox.For me, the climb was slow at...
by Tessa Schlesinger 4 years ago
It might be coincidence, and it's possible everybody else's figures have also dropped by 500%. It's also possible that from being paid out every month for a good few years, I am suddenly not paid out at all.Is this happening to everybody?I told Matt after he banned me that I had no desire for a...
by x 11 years ago
For those who want to share. And possibly commiserate...HP comparing Monday-5/6 data versus Monday-5/13 data, HP is down 19.3%HP comparing Tuesday-5/7 data versus Tuesday-5/14 data, HP is down 15.0%PDS comparing Monday-5/6 data versus Monday-5/13 data, PDS is down 28.7% PDS comparing Tuesday-5/7...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |