Trump's Dream Team: Appointing for America's Success
As I watch President-elect Trump appoint individuals to key positions, I believe he is making deliberate and strategic choices that align with his vision for America. Trump’s appointments reflect his commitment to his core agenda: putting America first, strengthening the economy, securing borders, and ensuring that the American people’s interests are at the forefront of every decision. He understands that to bring his agenda to fruition, he needs to surround himself with people who not only share his values but also possess the expertise and determination to execute his plans effectively.
One of the key reasons Trump selects like-minded individuals is because he knows that a unified team is essential to making real progress. By appointing people who align with his vision, whether in the economy, defense, or public health, Trump can avoid the constant friction and opposition that often undermines a presidency. These appointments are not just about loyalty—they are about capability and shared goals. For instance, appointing experienced business leaders, strong conservatives, and individuals with proven track records allows him to implement policies swiftly, without the delays often caused by ideological clashes.
Additionally, Trump’s appointments often reflect his understanding that the political establishment in Washington has been ineffective at solving problems. He seeks out individuals who are not part of the entrenched political class, knowing that these fresh perspectives can shake up the system and deliver the change the American people voted for. Whether it’s choosing individuals with deep knowledge of economic policy, border security, or law enforcement, he is making decisions that prioritize the well-being of American citizens over political correctness or bureaucratic norms.
Another significant factor in Trump’s appointment process is his desire to push forward his American-first agenda. His picks are not merely about filling positions—they are about ensuring that the right policies are in place to protect American jobs, reduce unnecessary regulations, and hold those in power accountable. His focus is on securing a future where American citizens can thrive, and that requires leaders who are committed to defending American values and protecting the nation's interests, not globalist agendas.
Ultimately, Trump’s appointments are a reflection of his belief in a strong, prosperous America, and his understanding that the right team is crucial to achieving that vision. By surrounding himself with individuals who share his goals and have the experience to execute them, Trump is setting up his administration for success. His appointments speak to his broader commitment to creating a nation that works for all Americans, not just a select few.
I strongly support President Trump's appointments and the powerful team he has assembled. I’m fully on board with his agenda and believe he has made strategic choices to bring it to fruition. To succeed, Trump needs a loyal team that shares his vision and is dedicated to working hard for the American people. It’s evident that he has learned the hard way that Washington politicians can’t always be trusted. Many of them, unfortunately, are part of the establishment that opposes the kind of change necessary to expose the dysfunction and corruption within our government.
Share your thoughts on why you believe he is making the choices he has made, and how you think the team will perform. Will they be cohesive? Do you feel we will see greatness—or a great disaster? It's time to step up—make your prediction!" It's time to step up—make your prediction!"
Instantly, I thought of the song by Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention titled Fifty - Fifty. In the song the following chorus is repeated that would be my prediction at this time.
"I figure the odds be fifty-fifty
I just might have something to say"
Fifty-Fifty (Lyrics) by genius.com
https://genius.com/The-mothers-of-inven … fty-lyricsI predict great things ahead, a U.S. comeback like we've never experienced before! Everything will fall into place, just as it should. As Trump and his team invest in America, Americans need to be investing(.)
It is an exciting time and we can buckle up and enjoy the ride or get left behind... scowling, along with the ladies from the View!I am very impressed with your writing. I think you missed your calling. You should be Trump's speech writer or his Press Secretary. I really like how you used gross generalizations to rationalize Trump and his selection to make the world a better place. However you provided nothing specific or any supporting evidence to support your claims.
According to Psychology Today, Trump fits the profile of DM-5 person suffering from narcissism. That's why he is attracted to forceful individuals like Putin, Kim Jung un and many other dictators. I think all of the people he has selected and will continue to select have one thing in common and that is forceful personalities.
However none of them have any expertise in the positions they are assigned to run. If one replaces the word run with manage then it becomes clear that is what those job require is management skills, not a love of Trump's ideas.
Some of these departments like the DOD that they are going to manage have thousand of personnel in them. The person who is going to manage that department is a Fox News host with some combat experience and according to Trump, he has a nice look about him. Good luck when it comes to managing strong willed four star generals.
I worked for many years as a technical writing consultant and was employed by many high tech startup companies. These companies were formed by brilliant engineers for the products they developed. However when they started to scale up, some of them failed. The reason is they were great at designing and engineering, but terrible at running the company as a CEO. The ones that recognized that and brought in CEO's from other successfully companies were successful.
Elon Musk has Asperger's Syndrome and is known to be a terrible manager. RFK Junior has a brain worm and likes to pick up road kill and hide it in Central Park. He also has a terrible speech impediment that makes it hard to understand what he is saying. His sister says he is Koo Koo for Koko Puffs. Matt Gaetz has absolutely no experience as an AG which is one of the most powerful positions in the government.
However all of these people have one thing in common and that is forceful personalities. If you think that is what it takes to make America a better place to live in, I hope and pray you are right...Your glass is half full. My glass is half empty.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog … y-disorderGaetz practice law for all of 3 years before he became a representative in the Florida house. It appears that he has never tried a case. His law license was suspended at one point for non-payment of dues... I guess if you don't use it who cares if it lapses?
I wondered how long it would take for the Psychology quacks to set aside their oath and begin telling us that Trump and everyone he is close to has mental problems; is crazy in the common vernacular.
Guess it's time, isn't it?Thank you for the kind words! I have a passion for writing and am currently working on a book about my mother's life.
I aimed to share my perspective on how and why Trump selected his team. Hopefully, the original post came across as unbiased until the end, where I offered my personal take.
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts so thoroughly. I’m glad to see you view your glass as at least half full! I also agree that a common thread among this team is their forceful personalities. It will be fascinating to watch so many like-minded individuals involved in government. I’d call this a great experiment!
Once this show gets on the road, I think HPs political forum will sizzle."also agree that a common thread among this team is their forceful personalities. "
It looks like their common thread is being woefully unqualified for the positions there nominated to as well as a history of questionable statements and actions...
----- Great! why? Because I am an outsider.
Proximity to sexual abuse and scandal increasingly looks like a prerequisite for joining Trump’s upcoming Cabinet.
Share your thoughts on why you believe he is making the choices he has made, and how you think the team will perform. Will they be cohesive? Do you feel we will see greatness—or a great disaster? It's time to step up—make your prediction!
I can see you are hijacking my thread. Hopefully, no one offers air. Several threads address individual Trump picks for his team.
"Federal investigators have established a web of payments among Matt Gaetz and dozens of friends and associates who are said to have taken part with him in drug-fueled sex parties, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.
Among those who received money from Mr. Gaetz were two women who have testified that he hired them for sex, according to the document and a lawyer for the two women. The lawyer said payments to the women ultimately totaled around $10,000.
The document obtained by The Times was assembled by federal investigators during a sex-trafficking investigation into Mr. Gaetz, who is President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice for attorney general. It shows how Mr. Gaetz and a friend sent thousands of dollars through Venmo to dozens of people who, according to testimony that is said to have been given to federal and congressional investigators, were involved in sex parties from 2017 to 2020".
If the house won't release the ethics report then these witnesses need to be brought before a Committee for public testimony...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/20/us/p … s-sex.htmlJunior is a crackpot...
RFK Jr. says COVID is “targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people”: “COVID-19. There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately. COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., New York Post (July 15, 2023)
RFK Jr. believes that vaccines and Wi-Fi cause autism: “A mountain of scientific study links autism to early vaccination with certain vaccines.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr., NBC News (March 18, 2024) “I don’t think there’s any scientific question that vaccines cause autism if you actually read the science.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr., PatriotTakes (July 30, 2023) “Kennedy suggested that ‘wifi radiation’ could be causing autism, food allergies, asthma, eczema, or other chronic illnesses…. He also stated that it was rolled out to control behavior‘I think it degrades your mitochondria and it opens your blood-brain barrier.’” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Vice News (June 16, 2023)
RFK Jr. spreads misinformation that chemicals are turning boys transgender: “A lot of the problems we see in kids, particularly boys, it’s probably underappreciated how much of that is coming from chemical exposures, including a lot of sexual dysphoria that we’re seeing. I mean, they’re swimming through a soup of toxic chemicals today, and many of those are endocrine disruptors. There’s Atrazine throughout our water supply, and atrazine… it will chemically castrate and forcibly feminize…there’s a lot of other evidence that it’s doing it to human beings as well.” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Jordan Peterson (June 19, 2023)
Just another unqualified pick.Happy Days Are Here Again! I love the song! It so reflects my joy and excitement. I just know I will be singing this all day!
I’ve shared my thoughts in this thread and can’t wait to hear how others feel about Trump’s team and their potential. It’s always fun to make predictions and then look back in a couple of years to see how things played out. I truly believe we’re going to see great things from this team, and yes, I think many more Americans will be singing “Happy Days Are Here Again!” soon!
And the wrestler for DOE?
Linda McMahon is not qualified for the position. Like Betsy DeVos, McMahon has no significant background in public schools nor any understanding of what it takes to help every student thrive. She served one year on the Connecticut Board of Education after lying about having a degree in education. McMahon spent her career as CEO of WWE, an entertainment company that has been accused of shady business practices and the abusive treatment of employees.
She has pledged to push an extremist agenda. McMahon co-founded the America First Policy Institute, an organization formed in 2021 specifically to promote Trump's public policy agenda. Her chief goal for education is to promote vouchers, which drain resources from public schools and send taxpayer money to unaccountable private schools that are permitted to discriminate against students.
And let's not forget the requisite sex scandal.... Involving children no less!
The suit alleges that McMahon, along with her husband Vince McMahon, the president of World Wrestling Entertainment, and WWE’s parent company, TKO Holdings, knowingly allowed WWE ringside announcer Mel Phillips Jr. to sexually abuse children between the 1970s and the 1990s.
We have no better than this? Why she was nominated? I don't know, she's donated a boatload of money? I'm sure she will be looking for pardons for herself and Vince if they are convicted...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/edu … 451271007/Pete Hegseth...
What kind of extremist nonsense is this?
On Monday, Hegseth appeared on the "CrossPolitic" podcast, which is hosted by Toby Sumpter and Gabe Rench.
During the discussion about Hegseth's book "Battle For The American Mind," Hegseth said that he is working to create a system of "classical Christian schools" to provide the recruits for an underground army that will eventually launch an "educational insurgency" to take over the nation.
"I think we need to be thinking in terms of these classical Christian schools are boot camps for winning back America," said Sumpter.
"That's what the crop of these classical Christian schools are gonna do in a generation," Hegseth agreed. "Policy answers like school choice, while they're great, that's phase two stuff later on once the foothold has been taken, once the recruits have graduated boot camp."
"We call it a tactical retreat," Hegseth continued. "We draw out in the last part of the book what an educational insurgency would look like, because I was a counterinsurgency instructor in Afghanistan and kind of the phases that Mao [Zedong] wrote about. We're in middle phase one right now, which is effectively a tactical retreat where you regroup, consolidate, and reorganize. And as you do so, you build your army underground with the opportunity later on of taking offensive operations in an overt way".
And yes, the required sex scandal....
"A California woman told police that Trump Cabinet pick Pete Hegseth physically blocked her from leaving a hotel room, took her phone, and then sexually assaulted her even though she “remembered saying ‘no’ a lot,” a police report obtained by CNN shows.
The 22-page report, released by the city attorney’s office of Monterey, California, on Wednesday night in response to a public records request, lays out the competing narratives of what happened in new detail – including conflicting accounts of how intoxicated Hegseth and the woman were, and descriptions of video surveillance showing some of their movements that night."
Is there really no one better available then this man? This is the best America has to offer?
Why he was nominated? Because he's a fox talking head and looks good while doing it... Is Trump himself generally says... He's out of Central casting.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … 467112007/Shar, I am listening to Glen Beck's radio program, and he just said something pretty profound! He talked a bit about God sparing Trump from the two attempts on his life (that we know of)
Suggesting that God didn't spare him, only to leave him now.
He isn't finished with him, not by a long shot (no pun intended)
That alone should give us ALL, even the toughest critic, skeptic, hope!
But, then he went on to say, that we have a much different Trump than we would have had if 2020 had not gone down as it did.
It got me to thinking...
As a result, he is going to be a better President, a stronger Leader, the writer of a brand new success story... because he is, now, a much better man!
Trump has surrounded himself with a team which his multiple experiences, his renewed faith, etc., have taught him, have shown him, are right!
Welcome to the Golden Age!That’s such a powerful reflection, and I couldn’t agree more! It’s inspiring to think about how God’s plan is unfolding in ways we may not fully understand yet, but we can already see His hand at work in shaping Trump’s journey. The trials and challenges he’s faced, especially over the past few years, have been refining him, strengthening his resolve, and deepening his faith. It’s as if God is preparing him for something even greater—something bigger than we can imagine.
I believe Trump’s renewed sense of purpose and his ability to surround himself with the right people aren’t just coincidence—they’re part of God’s plan to use him as a vessel for change and restoration. The setbacks of 2020 might have been devastating, but they’ve also given him time to reflect, grow, and prepare to lead with even more wisdom and humility.
God doesn’t leave His work unfinished, and I truly feel He’s not done with Trump. He’s teaching us all a lesson in patience, perseverance, and trust. As Glenn Beck said, this should give even the harshest critic hope. The storms of the past few years have been setting the stage for something extraordinary—a true Golden Age where we can witness the fruits of faith, resilience, and divine timing.
Thank you for sharing this! It’s a reminder to stay hopeful and trust that God’s plan is always perfect, even when we don’t see the whole picture yet.
I remember that day in Butler so clearly. My family was on vacation, and we were all watching Trump’s rally live that afternoon. When he was shot, we each had our own reactions, but what stuck with me the most was my 10-year-old grandson. Without hesitation, he said, “God saved him.” He was so determined, so sure, and then he added, “Trump will win. God wants him to.”
His words hit me like a ton of bricks, and all I could think was, “Out of the mouths of babes.”Or maybe God is using Trump to show us how far we as a people have strayed from his principles?
How can Christians pledge support for a man is unchristlike as Trump?
This is a man who has sown division across the country ever since he began his foray into politics and we've all been reaping the fruit of that discord ever since. His primary impulse is to turn neighbor against neighbor, routinely describing opponents and anyone who disagrees with him as enemies or other variations of dehumanizing language. This is not the way of Christ.... Am I to believe Christ would have supported a "me first" agenda?
Nah.I respectfully disagree with your view, and here’s why I feel differently based on my own religious teachings.
From my perspective, many of the points raised regarding Trump’s actions don’t fully align with the broader understanding of Christian principles.
I see the concern raised about Trump’s divisiveness and his "me first" attitude, but I think it’s important to break this down from both a political and biblical perspective. The argument that Trump’s actions contradict Christian teachings overlooks several key aspects that deserve consideration.
First, the idea that Trump’s rhetoric has sown division isn’t necessarily unchristlike. Yes, he uses combative language, but Jesus himself wasn’t shy about causing division when it came to confronting injustice or defending righteousness. In Matthew 10:34-36, Jesus explicitly says, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother...” This passage suggests that sometimes the truth requires confrontation, even division. Jesus didn’t shy away from conflict when it came to standing up for what was right. Likewise, Trump’s strong stance against what he perceives as corruption and injustice may be seen as necessary to challenge the status quo, even if it’s uncomfortable for some.
Regarding the "me first" argument, there’s truth to the notion that Trump’s rhetoric often prioritizes his own success and the success of the country he leads. However, from a Christian viewpoint, personal ambition is not inherently sinful if it doesn’t come at the expense of others. Philippians 2:3-4 reminds us to “do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit,” but it also calls for looking out for the interests of others. Trump’s "America First" agenda, while focused on national strength, can be viewed as an effort to improve the well-being of citizens, not just himself. The balance lies in using personal ambition to benefit the greater good, rather than exploiting others for personal gain.
Finally, the idea that Jesus’ disciples were all meek and passive is not true. Jesus chose strong, outspoken individuals who were willing to fight for truth. Matthew 16:18 highlights Jesus’ words to Peter: “And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.” Peter was bold, passionate, and unafraid of conflict when necessary. He fought for righteousness and stood firm in the face of opposition, much like Trump does today by challenging what he sees as a broken system. Jesus valued strength and courage in his followers, traits that many believe Trump embodies in his political battles.
In conclusion, while Trump’s style may be harsh, his actions can be viewed through the lens of biblical principles, such as standing firm for righteousness, pursuing justice, and working for the greater good. This doesn’t mean his approach is perfect, but it aligns with some biblical truths about courage, strength, and fighting for what is right.
I see the concern you raised about Trump’s divisiveness and his "me first" attitude, but I think it’s important to break this down from both a political and biblical perspective. The argument that Trump’s actions contradict Christian teachings overlooks several key aspects that deserve deeper consideration.
The idea that Trump’s rhetoric has sown division isn’t necessarily unchristlike. This is in the eye of the beholder --- Yes, he uses combative language selectively, but Jesus himself wasn’t shy about causing division when it came to confronting injustice or defending righteousness. In Matthew 10:34-36, Jesus explicitly says, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother...” This passage suggests that sometimes the truth requires confrontation, even division. Jesus didn’t shy away from conflict when it came to standing up for what was right. Likewise, Trump’s strong stance against what he truly perceives as corruption and injustice may be seen as necessary to challenge the status quo, even if it’s uncomfortable for some.
Regarding the "me first" argument, there’s truth to the notion that Trump’s rhetoric often prioritizes his own success and the success of the country he leads. However, from a Christian viewpoint, personal ambition is not inherently sinful if it doesn’t come at the expense of others. Philippians 2:3-4 reminds us to “do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit,” but it also calls for looking out for the interests of others. Trump’s "America First" agenda, while focused on national strength, can be viewed as an effort to improve the well-being of citizens, not just himself. The balance lies in using personal ambition to benefit the greater good, rather than exploiting others for personal gain. He has clearly given of himself, he has been dragged through fire, over and over, and yet he stands and fights.
Jesus’ disciples were not all meek and passive. Jesus chose strong, outspoken individuals who were willing to fight for truth. Matthew 16:18 highlights Jesus’ words to Peter: “And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.” Peter was bold, passionate, and unafraid of conflict when necessary. He fought for righteousness and stood firm in the face of opposition, much like Trump does today by challenging what he sees as a broken system. Jesus valued strength and courage in his followers, traits that many believe Trump embodies in his political battles.
In conclusion, while Trump’s style may be harsh, his actions can be viewed through the lens of biblical principles, such as standing firm for righteousness, pursuing justice, and working for the greater good. This doesn’t mean his approach is perfect, but it aligns with some biblical truths about courage, strength, and fighting for what is right.Bending, misinterpreting scripture to liken Trump to Christ is blasphemous. There isn't much in Trump's action, the way he's lived his life, or his speech that is Christ like. "America First" agenda is a disgrace to Jesus-first discipleship.
Is lying over 30,000 times a Christian virtue? Is adultery a Christian virtue? Is trying to steal something as precious as an election from a duly elected president a Christian virtue? What righteousness do you think Trump has?
You say Trump is pursuing justice. I see him as one of the most unjust persons on this planet. Trump's saving grace is that he has never been caught, because he is super rich and can afford the best lawyers who know how to delay, distract, and defend him.
He and Matt Gaetz are two peas in a pod, they are both guilty of sexual misconduct and have had rich fathers who gave them money to use as a get out of jail free cards.. If Trump is not guilty of any charges, why does he need immunity. The same thing goes for Matt Gaetz, if he is not guilty of the charges, why doesn't he want his records released to the public? Matt Gaetz had Kevin McCarthy removed from office because he was about to uncover Gaetz's frolicking with drugs and under age sexual excursions."If Trump is not guilty of any charges, why does he need immunity."
That has to take the prize for the silliest question ever on HP. Trump needs immunity because he has been persecuted for over 8 years by those wanting him out of the political arena and don't care how it is done. Weaponizing the justice system is just another tool in the arsenal, just as immunity is.In the comment you responded to I simply shared my very PERSONAL thoughts. I didn’t misinterpret or commit blasphemy, as Willow shared; I simply shared scripture and expressed my PERSONAL understanding of what I’ve gleaned from the biblical quotes, and how I personally connect them to my views on Trump. I need not defend my religious beliefs to anyone.
in your comment, you immediately jumped into a Trump rant. Please take this kindly --- but honestly, it’s a bit late for what you’ve shared to matter. He won, and he is our president now. As a rule, I try to engage in meaningful conversation, but constantly trashing Trump at this point doesn’t serve any purpose. It just feeds the need to keep a vendetta going, and that’s not something I want to be a part of. The water’s under the bridge—he won. I can understand your disappointment, but is it really beneficial to anyone anymore?It is beneficial to God if there is such a thing. He is looking down from where ever he is and not liking what he has seen from Trump's actions. He knows what Trump and company is about and so do you, except you and all his disciples are in denial and doing the happy dance because he won the election.
If you believe in God then you believe in judgement day and there will be a price Trump and company will pay for what they have done. This is what you get when you mix politics with religion. It cuts both ways.
Scripture can be interpreted to mean anything you want it to. It has justified millions being killed throughout the ages because of interpretation of scripture.
Yes I feel a need to keep it going because it is about accountability. It is immoral to do what Trump has done without having any accountability. I don't forgive him for what he has done, just because he has won an election and we should move on.
Wait until he starts his mass deportation of those who have done nothing wrong. You haven't seen anything yet. Now I understand where you are coming from in your writings. You interpret Trump's actions just like you interpret scripture. That's why you generalize and rationalize Trump actions. It all makes sense now.
When Trump was questioned by the Evangelical Christians about his bibles, they asked him what was his favorite passage. His answer was, "There are far too many favorite passages for me to comment on." Translation= I never read the bible, I just sell them because they are made in China. I get 60 bucks for each one... what a deal!!!
To me Trump will always be a person who is suffering from acute narcissism and is a master con-artist who knows when to attack and when to play the victim.. I don't care if he won an election, he will never change because he can't.To be polite, I read your full comment. I didn’t find anything particularly new except for one sentence that we haven’t fully discussed. I don’t see much value in ruminating over everything you dislike about Trump. However, as I mentioned, there was one sentence that pertained to the subject at hand.
“Scripture can be interpreted to mean anything you want it to.”
Yes, that was my point. I shared my perspective on how I feel certain biblical verses relate to Trump and how he has been perceived. Since you mentioned that you don't believe in God, I understand that you may not fully grasp how my view in this case has been influenced by my faith.
It would have been wise to follow the entire conversation which began with AB and myself. You do not have the context of what was being discussed, and how it progressed into a conversation with Willow."He is looking down from where ever he is and not liking what he has seen from Trump's actions."
Just curious, but how do you know that? It's a pretty bald, plain statement for not having a single shred of evidence...I don't know that. I said if there is a God. If there is a God, I believe it is nature itself, just like Di Vinci believed. I don't believe mixing religion and politics is a good thing. There is nothing in the Constitution that says anything about God. Eisenhower in his effort to distance our country from the Soviet Union came up with the slogan In God We Trust. But that was a political action.
Questioning the existence of God, all while predicting the actions of God... although God doesn't exist... all while mercilessly criticizing, critiquing, belittling, questioning a true Believer, as not being good enough or measuring up...
You are some kind of special!Angie, I too found his statement to be all over the place. In my view, I’ve come to see him as a dogmatic person. He seems to dismiss others' views easily, leaving little room to respect the fact that others may hold very different perspectives.
"His word is his last word" he seems firm, unwavering, or inflexible in his opinions. Once he has made a statement, he is unlikely to reconsider or entertain opposing viewpoints. This implies that he sees his perspective as final and is not open to debate or discussion. I am not sure how to address this form of thinking.
Wow, kids are something else! His response will always stay with you. It obviously had an impact on your grandson, and he will someday tell his children about the day a President, came so very close to death.
Oh but that vital, initial document --The Declaration of Independence, set the stage for all other documents which followed. Our Founders staked their lives on it:
God is at the start, at the center of, and at the end.
P.S. In God We Trust was not a political action, it's a testament.
The fact remains, you, royally, disrespected Sharlee.In God we Trust was put on currency as a political action.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-his … t-into-law
This is Sharlee's reply to me. Where in here does she say I disrespected her? I think you like to twist things to get people in trouble if they don't agree with you. "The fact remains, you, royally, disrespected Sharlee."
The fact remains you, are royally disrespecting my right to voice my views.
"To be polite, I read your full comment. I didn’t find anything particularly new except for one sentence that we haven’t fully discussed. I don’t see much value in ruminating over everything you dislike about Trump. However, as I mentioned, there was one sentence that pertained to the subject at hand.
“Scripture can be interpreted to mean anything you want it to.”
Yes, that was my point. I shared my perspective on how I feel certain biblical verses relate to Trump and how he has been perceived. Since you mentioned that you don't believe in God, I understand that you may not fully grasp how my view in this case has been influenced by my faith.
It would have been wise to follow the entire conversation which began with AB and myself. You do not have the context of what was being discussed, and how it progressed into a conversation with Willow."
But I did read the entire thread with Sharlee and Willow. I just didn't comment until later.
The newest member to be considered for the dream team... Or the clown car depending on how you look at it..
Fun fact: When Pam Bondi was Florida Attorney General, her office was prepared to bring charges for fraud against Trump University, which had bilked a slew of Florida victims. Donald Trump gave her a $25,000 campaign contribution and she ordered the investigation closed.
Looks like the Department of Justice is shaping up to be the Donald Trump law firm...And I'm sure she'll have to explain this at her hearing...
https://x.com/harryjsisson/status/1859748999571591551Facts --- No, Donald Trump was never prosecuted for Trump University. The company, which started in 2005, faced accusations of fraud for misleading customers about its real estate seminars. In 2013, New York's Attorney General sued, claiming it was operating illegally and deceiving students.
In 2016, Trump settled the case for $25 million without admitting guilt, denying any wrongdoing. No criminal charges were filed, and the issue was resolved through civil lawsuits, not criminal prosecution.
Pam Bondi, the former Florida Attorney General, dropped the investigation into Trump University in 2013 after receiving a $25,000 campaign contribution from Donald Trump. The timing of the donation raised concerns and led to accusations of a conflict of interest, with critics suggesting the donation influenced her decision.
Bondi's office explained that the decision to drop the case was based on a review of the situation. They argued that the case was already being handled by other states, like New York and California, and that no further action was needed in Florida. Bondi herself denied any wrongdoing and maintained that the donation had no bearing on her decision.
Florida complaints related to Trump University were being represented in part of the broader settlement that was reached in 2016 in New York. The settlement, which totaled $25 million, resolved several lawsuits, including those from Florida.
While the settlement did not involve any admission of guilt from Donald Trump, it was designed to compensate the affected students, including those in Florida. Former students who were part of the class action lawsuit were eligible to receive monetary compensation. The settlement was intended to cover claims from students who felt they were misled by the company's marketing and its real estate investment programs. FACTS MATTER"FACTS MATTER"
Well the facts are that she closed up her investigation after getting a contribution...And correlation in time is always proof of causation, right? At least if one can use it to show evil by Trump or someone remotely connected to him.
Well it looks pretty bad. But I guess no worse than the scam of a "university" Trump ran
Of COURSE it looks bad! All you have to do is make a few minor assumptions, a few logical errors, and you have something to hang on Trump again! Wonderful, right?
What university was that? You mean the one he funded and founded, putting someone else in charge? Is that the one "that Trump ran"? Should not have happened the way it did, but that Trump was not charged for violations by underlings DOES say quite a bit, even if you don't want it to.Is he ever responsible for anything? Am I to believe he was that poor of a businessman that he was unable to run a legitimate university? Well, strike that... He was able to disprove the old adage " The house always wins" when he bankrupted his casinos lol.
What kind of ethics and judgment does a prosecutor, Bondi in this case, have in taking money from someone who's under criminal investigation?
It was entirely legal for Pam Bondi to accept a campaign donation from Donald Trump. Our laws clearly define the parameters for political contributions, and no laws were broken. Bondi, like Kamala Harris, decided to allow New York to handle the entire class-action case against Trump University, which streamlined the process and saved taxpayer money and resources.
Political contributions and potential conflicts of interest are a complex issue for any candidate. For instance, Kamala Harris faced criticism during her tenure as California Attorney General for not pursuing investigations into certain high-profile cases involving donors. Notably, Harris received campaign contributions from executives at Herbalife and failed to prosecute the company despite allegations of it being a pyramid scheme. This raised questions about possible conflicts of interest, although no legal wrongdoing was proven.
Another instance involving Kamala Harris that drew scrutiny for potential conflict of interest relates to her handling of cases against Planned Parenthood during her time as California Attorney General. In 2016, Harris’s office launched an investigation into pro-life activists who had secretly recorded Planned Parenthood officials discussing fetal tissue sales. Critics argued that Harris’s actions appeared politically motivated, given her close ties to Planned Parenthood, including substantial campaign donations from the organization and its affiliates.
When discussing these matters, it’s important to consider context and ensure consistency in evaluating all candidates' actions under similar scrutiny.I did not question the legality, only her judgment and ethics to accept money from someone who was under criminal investigation. She has much to answer for. Just as troublesome is her history of being an election denier. Bondi was one of several Trump lawyers who was spreading voting conspiracy theories and false allegations of election fraud. For me, that alone is disqualifying.
At any rate, the DOJ is stacking up to be a who's who of former Trump personal lawyers.I noticed that you overlooked the campaign contributions Harris received. Even though I provided two instances that I believe are far more serious actions she has taken, and the donations were far more lucrative, in the multiple millions. It seems like there's a degree of inconsistency in your response. (there are several more, but these two will suffice to make my point)
I believe it's important to include the research I’ve gathered to keep the conversation clear for other viewers who may follow this conversation.
Harris, for instance, made the decision to drop cases and accepted millions in campaign donations from businesses involved in these cases. These actions should be part of the discussion, as they raise significant ethical concerns.
1.Political contributions and potential conflicts of interest are a complex issue for any candidate. For instance, Kamala Harris faced criticism during her tenure as California Attorney General for not pursuing investigations into certain high-profile cases involving donors. Notably, Harris received campaign contributions from executives at Herbalife and failed to prosecute the company despite allegations of it being a pyramid scheme. This raised questions about possible conflicts of interest, although no legal wrongdoing was proven.
2.Another instance involving Kamala Harris that drew scrutiny for potential conflict of interest relates to her handling of cases against Planned Parenthood during her time as California Attorney General.
Yes, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) records show that Kamala Harris received a $15,000 donation from Planned Parenthood during her 2014 re-election campaign as California Attorney General. The donation, along with her office's handling of investigations related to Planned Parenthood, was a topic of scrutiny, particularly given her strong ties to the organization and its political support. This donation has been widely reported in news outlets such as Politico and The Sacramento Bee. You can access FEC donation records
https://www.fec.gov/data/
I would guess if you were aware of Harris's practice to drop cases for lucrative donations you would not have supported such a corrupt candidate.
Social Media Posts Push False Claims About Kamala Harris And Planned Parenthood
Popular Facebook posts claimed Kamala Harris tried to put “pro-lifers” in jail who “exposed Planned Parenthood selling baby parts.”
Planned Parenthood denied the accusations. Staffers in the unedited videos discussed covering costs for the legal donation of fetal tissue for medical research.
A dozen states investigated Planned Parenthood after edited videos released by anti-abortion activists accused it of illegally selling fetal tissue. No criminal findings were ever made for that activity.
While Harris was California attorney general, her agency investigated the anti-abortion activists. They were charged with violating state privacy laws after Harris left for the U.S. Senate.
And there are a boat load of references that address this false claim.
https://www.capradio.org/articles/2020/ … arenthood/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamal … arenthood/
To some, it may seem like a contentious issue, but many people today are quick to accuse others of indiscretions. However, the situation with Pam Bondi and the Trump University case is more nuanced. Bondi explained her decision to drop the case by pointing out that the people of Florida who had filed lawsuits were already included in a class action lawsuit in New York, which eventually resulted in compensation when it was settled there. By stepping back, Bondi saved Florida taxpayers from unnecessary legal expenses since the case was already being handled in New York.
Similarly, California, under Attorney General Kamala Harris, chose not to pursue further investigations into Trump University, deciding instead to allow New York to take the lead on the case. Despite the allegations of fraud, the claims were all addressed within the New York class action lawsuit, thus avoiding redundant legal actions in California. This approach kept state resources from being spent on a case that was already being processed elsewhere.
And the latest pick from "central casting" to join the dream team...
Trump's pick for surgeon general has previously sold "vitamins" on Fox News. Very Dr Oz of her.
He really is just picking people he's seen on TV isn't he?I'm so pleased to see yet another strong, intelligent, and principled Christian woman joining Team Trump. Dr. Janette Nesheiwat brings valuable medical expertise and public health experience, all while holding firm to her faith and conservative values. Her leadership will no doubt add strength to the team and continue to emphasize the importance of both personal responsibility and service to the nation.
Dr. Janette Nesheiwat brings a unique combination of medical expertise, public health experience, and strong personal values that could make her an effective Surgeon General. As a physician with hands-on clinical experience, she has worked in emergency medicine and public health initiatives, including playing a role in the U.S. government's Operation Warp Speed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Her background also includes working with organizations like the CDC and WHO, allowing her to approach health issues with both a domestic and global perspective.
In addition to her medical career, Dr. Nesheiwat is a committed Christian who supports conservative Republican values. Her beliefs likely influence her stance on healthcare, emphasizing personal responsibility, the importance of family values, and a strong moral compass. As a medical correspondent for Fox News, she has been a prominent voice in advocating for preventative healthcare, lifestyle changes, and wellness practices. Her ability to communicate complex health topics to the public in an accessible and engaging way would be an asset as Surgeon General, especially when addressing key health concerns and promoting national health initiatives.
With her leadership experience in both clinical settings and media, along with her strong values, Dr. Nesheiwat could bring a well-rounded and principled approach to the role of Surgeon General, focusing on public health education, prevention, and effective crisis management.I just hope she stands up to RFK, Jr. when the need arises.
I agree, and I believe RFK Jr. will benefit from having two well-educated physicians on his team, providing a balanced perspective. From my understanding, RFK Jr. is largely self-educated in the sciences, a field he has long been passionate about. Science, as we know, is both precise and complex, and it's important for someone like him, who has shared his views for years, to consider and weigh the input from experts in the field. A team dynamic often leads to better outcomes, as diverse expertise can offer more comprehensive solutions to complicated issues. It's crucial for him to remain open to the valuable insights that others bring to the table.
I believe Trump is being very strategic in the teams he's assembling, carefully selecting individuals with unique qualifications to bring to the table. What stands out is that he is choosing people from diverse backgrounds, many of whom are not traditional politicians. This approach could lead to fresh perspectives and more practical solutions, rather than relying on the usual political circles. It will be interesting to see how this dynamic unfolds and how these non-political figures impact his administration's decision-making."From my understanding, RFK Jr. is largely self-educated in the sciences, a field he has long been passionate about."
I'm sorry, Shar, but that just isn't possible today. Edison may have done it, but it isn't going to happen today. The equipment alone to become "self educated" in any specific field, such as biology, chemistry, physics, etc. will cost more than anyone short of billionaires earn.
The reason is that to become "self educated" in the sciences requires that you do your own experimentation. You must first learn the math, going back to Aristotle and working your way forward re-doing all the work of those old geniuses and only then begin with your work on science matters. One must also, without fail, learn and understand that one's own prejudices must be set aside; RFK has not taken this step at all, and obviously does not understand the statistics behind vaccinations. He has an awfully long way to go to be self educated in any science at all. As in high school level learning on up.I completely agree with your point that becoming "self-educated" in the sciences is no small feat, especially today. With my background in the science of human anatomy and the science of nursing, I know firsthand the rigorous process of learning that involves not just reading but conducting experiments and thoroughly understanding the underlying principles, whether it's math, biology, or chemistry. You don't just pick up a textbook and "figure it out" on your own. It requires access to resources, mentorship, and years of formal study, especially to understand the complexities of fields like biology and the processes of human physiology.
For example, mixing chemicals in a laboratory to create a usable additive for food isn't just about the chemical reaction itself; it's about the science of exact measurements to create a new substance, understanding how the human body processes that additive, what effects it might have, and determining safe consumption levels. Science is about evidence, reproducibility, and critical thinking—not simply following a theory or opinion.
RFK Jr.'s passion for the sciences is noted, but I agree that without formal training or proper mentoring, he may miss key aspects of scientific methodology and statistical analysis. Understanding the full picture—such as the role of vaccines in public health—requires a solid foundation in epidemiology and statistics, fields that are far more complex than some of the narratives he's shared.
I don’t want to discredit his interest, but the nuances of science—especially when it comes to human health—are far more intricate than simply being passionate about the subject. It takes years of dedicated education to understand and apply these concepts responsibly.
I believe that now RFK Jr. will have two highly qualified individuals to debate his views, and I think each of them will bring valuable expertise to the table. Their knowledge could be incredibly helpful in informing the American public about better health practices and the science behind them. With their combined insights, the conversation could move toward more evidence-based discussions that can truly guide health policies and decisions. Facts show we are not a healthy nation. What our FDA claims is safe to consume is banned in other nations. So in reality what could it hurt to have this team weed through the poisons they have us eating?So it's a plus that there will be others around that can moderate or squash his crackpot views? Why not just nominate a qualified individual for the position to begin with? Most of us will not feel any better that Junior will have babysitters around him, he shouldn't be there in the first place.
I don't understand why folks keep skirting around the absolute wacko things he has said."Most of us will not feel any better that Junior will have babysitters around him, he shouldn't be there in the first place."
Really, "most of us" --- I see that statement as arrogant. Speak for yourself, not sure if you have noted your group type think has become pretty much destroyed as of late.Destroyed how? By Trump's 49% "mandate"?! And yes, I do believe that most of us aren't on board with the idea that Wi-Fi controls behavior or that covid misses Ashkenazi Jews or that chemicals in the water make people transgender or gay.
How is maga not participating in groupthink?You have the freedom to believe whatever you please... I certainly have no interest in your views. They do not in any respect align with my own. I find them very leftist/typical. Nothing new... Always ruminating on what if or past, that at this point means zip.
It means nothing to you and all the Trumpers. But to the half of the country that didn't vote for him and saw Project 2025 coming, it means everything. We are now seeing P-2025 unfolding and the people he is appointing to vital government positions is frightening to me and others..
You may be able to rationalize and generalize all of Trump's actions into positive outcomes, but I see what he and his jolly group of unqualified misfits as a threat to the tenants of what our democratic republic was founded on. This country will never be the same and I don't mean that in a good way.I get that you're concerned about the direction things are heading, but it’s important to remember that democracy took place, and we have the chance to vote again in four years to choose a new president. The people who voted for Trump have every right to support his vision, just as those who didn’t are entitled to their opinions. That’s how our system works, and it’s healthy that we have such passionate debates.
As for the appointments, every one of Trump’s choices has had solid education and experience. These are people the president trusts to help form a strong, well-thought-out team to keep the promises made to Americans. While you might see it as a threat, I believe it’s a plan to bring change that many of us feel is needed, and a team that's going to work together to get things done.
In the end, we’re all part of this democratic process, and whether we agree or not, we have the opportunity to express our views and vote. That’s what makes this country great. The proof will be in the pudding. In four years will a majority feel it was good and tasty or not suitable for consumption?
I ask --- what if it is well-liked? Where do you go from there?
Shar,
I expected the left to melt down after President Donald Trump won the election. It is fascinating to see how their TDS is now in high gear. They are saying and projecting the most ridiculous things.
At first, I enjoyed their non-stop whining combined with their ignorance about President Donald Trump's second term. It was quite entertaining. Then it became annoying because they have learned nothing from their huge loss in the election. There was no self-reflection or taking responsibility. The only thing I saw was the left playing victim and blaming American voters for being bigots, racists, misogynists, and more.
They learned absolutely NOTHING. It was a huge defeat for the left. President Donald Trump overcame their lawfare, their constant daily lies about him as well as having 96 percent negative press coverage, two assassination attempts as well as two bogus impeachments.
President Donald Trump has shown courage, grace under pressure, focus on his goals, and determination that one can only admire. He has achieved the status of a living legend.
Doesn't the left realize the American people saw through all their nonsense? They took a good look at the left and didn't like what they saw. MANY people changed from democrat to Republican. President Donald Trump took EVERY swing state. He did better in such blue states as New Jersey and California than any Republican candidate has done for over 20 years. He's the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in over 2 decades. The demographic shifts toward him in the black community and Hispanic community were impressive. More blue-collar workers voted for President Donald Trump than a democrat for the first time in decades.
It was a resounding defeat for the left and they seem unable to accept the reality of it or don't have the mental ability to comprehend it.
I'm not complaining. I encourage the democrats to continue their behavior. It proves their serious disconnect with the American people. It only helps President Donald Trump and the Republican party. Their detachment from voters will lead to many Republican victories in the future.
Can you say, "President Vance 2028?"Nah we're just waiting for all the freebies Trump promised. Our cheap groceries, cheap gas, lowered rent, affordable housing, low interest rates. Low mortgage rates, Affordable child care. Big tax cuts for the middle class. Better health Care at a lower price or no cost at all. Capping my high credit card interest rates, making the interest on my car loan tax deductible. Increasing that child tax credit and of course cutting my energy bills in half. You know, just cheap everything. Just counting the days because he says it will all happen very quickly.
Then work for them. Work towards making America great again instead of becoming just another welfare state, with freebies for some and bills for the rest.
Unlike Harris, promising all kinds of freebies, up to a $25,000 gift per person (to be paid for by someone else), Trump promises that IF we work for it we can have it. So, work for it!I hope you realize you're proving my point.
Harris’s campaign leaned heavily on offering freebies through expansive social programs—things like free childcare, $25,000 for down payments on homes, free healthcare, and various other handouts. In contrast, Trump’s approach is about fixing what’s broken and empowering Americans to succeed through hard work. He’s not promising giveaways but focusing on enabling people to buy homes with lower interest rates, afford childcare that they are responsible for paying, and secure private insurance through their own efforts. The message is clear: the rewards come from working hard, not relying on handouts. And being assured he offers a government that will provide opportunities for all, a fair shake on taxes, and lower costs for Americans.
It’s about real opportunity, not dependence. It would seem you know little about Trump's agenda—no freebies. Now, your gal—freebies galore. I certainly realize some find freebies more attractive, but the people of America opted for Trump's agenda. It's called democracy.Harris didn't offer free childcare? And Trump's plan puts us trillions more in debt than hers did. After all of his giveaways I don't know where the revenue will come from to fund something like social security. Literally nothing he is offering has to do with work.
I'm already a responsible working person. So I will be looking for my mortgage rate to be cut, my insurance premiums, my energy costs cut in half as well as much lower prices at the grocery store and at the gas pump plus everything I mentioned previously that he has promised us working people. Especially that tax break for the middle class.You are going to have to wait as Elon Musk says that there will be pain before progress. The excuse for a Trump failure is already being well planned.
Oh I think I know as well as you that we are likely to get nothing but pain. I will remind them though, at every step of the way, when these ludicrous promises fail to materialize.
To correct my comment ----In her 2024 campaign, Vice President Kamala Harris proposed expanding the Child Tax Credit (CTC). She supports reinstating and enhancing the temporary expansion introduced during the pandemic, increasing the maximum credit from $2,000 to up to $3,600 per child, with a goal of making it permanent. Harris also suggested offering up to $6,000 in tax credits during a child’s first year to help parents cover essential expenses.
The rest of your comment is a diversion. I was discussing freebies and social programs. Trump has not proposed any at all... Zero.
It would seem Biden had no concerns about replenishing SS. Guess you might want to ruminate on that.
It is very apparent you know little to nothing about Trump's agenda. I have no intention of enlightening you.
"I'm already a responsible working person. So I will be looking for my mortgage rate to be cut, my insurance premiums, my energy costs cut in half as well as much lower prices at the grocery store and at the gas pump plus everything I mentioned previously that he has promised us working people. Especially that tax break for the middle class."
You do realize all of the above did increase due to the Biden administration. Yes, Trump will need to correct these problems. Not sure why you would use this strategy in a comment.
But Yes, it will be great to return when you had all that -- Trump's last turn.
What did Harris chant --- "We aren't going back!" Yeah, ya are, and hopefully, you will enjoy it as you did then. Facts show we all had all of the above mentioned under Trump --- Facts are facts. You sure put your foot in that one.Trump's plans give away more than they bring in. That's a fact. Where will the money be made up? Trump's giveaways add trillions more to the deficit than did the Harris agenda. That's a fact .
Covid disruptions were responsible for the economic difficulties over the past few years but the Biden administration has gotten us back on track, trending in the right direction. Those are the facts.
Don't look now, but the U.S. economy is outperforming all other richer countries and it has been for a rather long time. Oh, I know but EGGS....
trump has put himself in a corner to deliver on his agenda. He will most certainly not be allowed to ride the positive trend of the Biden economy. I will be looking for data related to policy to evaluate trump...not his bluster.
What I'm expecting though? Economic indicators that Trump currently uses to say we're a failing Nation will be lauded after he takes office, something he points to and attempts to take credit for. Just like he lied about the Mexican presidents phone call to make it appear his words prompted her cooperation...when Biden had already successfully gained that cooperation.
He's a con man.I am unaware of any Trump "giveaways". Who is he giving money to, and how much?
Where does the money come in to make up for the lost revenue due to his tax break plan? The revenue loss due to his plan to exempt overtime income from tax? Lost revenue due to ending tax on social security benefits? Revenue lost to lowering the corporate income tax rate?
How will the credits to first-time home buyers be funded? How will the higher child tax credit be paid for? Getting rid of the cap on salt? Where will that revenue be made up? No tax on tips? It's like there's a tax break in every pot huh? Where do we make up the Lost revenue though for all these freebies?
I mean he did offer, promise free IVF also...LOL
Given our debt problems, how does all this work? I'll give you one guess where they're going to go for the money...I see. What people earn actually belongs to the government, not the worker, so allowing them to keep more of what they earn is actually giving government money to the person that earned it. A giveaway, then.
Needless to say I disagree with that philosophy.
I understand and agree that the deficit may well climb with all the tax cuts, but disagree that they are "giveaways". The proper way to handle tax cuts is to have equal spending cuts to accompany them, but of course we're talking about politicians (whether Trump, Biden, Harris, Congress, or anyone else on the Hill), and politicians do not cut spending. It is their JOB, after all, to spend your money and they do it with gusto.Oh, Yeah?
We are not children, both Republicans and Democrats has know that the meat ax cuts proposed by Republicans would never be politically palatable. And, you know what, it never has been. Do we take the meat ax to wasteful military spending? Whose ox is to gored, that is the question? I invite the GOP to present such draconian cuts into services that effect real people and see the response for mid-terms in 2026.
"The lost revenue due to his tax break plan"
Actually, many economists agree that a decrease in taxes increases tax revenue.
"Do tax cuts pay for themselves?
At current tax rates, the direct revenue loss from cutting tax rates almost always exceeds the indirect gain from increased activity or reduced tax avoidance. Cutting tax rates can pay for itself. How much depends on how people respond to tax changes."
No reply, you repeat yourself time and again... Must be hard to dwell on all of "what Trump did, and what he will do"...
But where will the lost revenue due to the giveaways come from? His plans don't bring in more revenue than he will spend... That's a problem
Mike, To be honest, I felt like left-leaning Democratic supporters would go into overdrive—screaming at the sky, late-night hosts becoming tearful and outraged, and left-leaning media amplifying their indignation. I imagined The View would launch into relentless critiques, blaming Republicans for unleashing chaos. Looking back on the aftermath of Trump’s win, I wasn’t wrong or disappointed by what I witnessed—it unfolded exactly as I had anticipated.
I also enjoyed watching the liberal meltdown after Trump’s win—there’s nothing quite like that spectacle. I figured their attention would eventually shift to some new trend, allowing them to retreat with a shred of dignity from the chaos they had stirred. It’s clear now that some left-leaning media, like MSNBC, are starting to face the consequences of their missteps. With the network reportedly up for sale, and Musk cheekily hinting on X about buying it, you can almost hear the panic setting in. Yikes, indeed!
When it comes to social media, I think some people have learned their lesson and are moving on. But let’s face it—those with TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) are never going to find a cure. They’ll keep digging into all things Trump, stuck in a foggy, obsessive realm forever. Not that I’m complaining! Honestly, I encourage the Democrats to keep up their antics—it only accelerates the vital changes we need in America. Their hair-on-fire outrage? It’s the perfect torchlight for our cause.
At first, I tried to be understanding with those suffering from TDS—showing kindness and putting myself in their shoes. I hoped they’d eventually wake up, see that Americans aren’t on board with woke leftist ideologies, and simply move on. But it’s clear that’s not happening, and honestly, I’m over it. Now, I’m all about the tough-love approach—time to "snap out of it!" They need to realize the craziness they’ve clung to is behind most Americans. We’ve got a new president, and I can confidently say President JD Vance in 2028. The next four years promise to be uplifting and exciting!"and I can confidently say President JD Vance in 2028. The next four years promise to be uplifting and exciting!"
Oh we'll be closely watching his agenda and how much he accomplishes. What exactly is he in charge of?I am very sure JD will have many tasks, and be working on many issues.
Trump has consistently praised JD Vance for his leadership, articulate speaking abilities, and deep connection with working and middle-class Americans. Vance has proven himself to be an effective advocate, particularly in areas that matter most to Trump's base, such as economic revitalization and national security. Given Vance's strong record in the Senate and his background as an author and public speaker, he is likely to be appointed to a key role within a future Trump administration. Vance's experience makes him a natural fit for overseeing programs focused on bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., securing American industries from unfair foreign competition, and leading efforts in immigration and border security.
His military service and experience as a public intellectual also suggest he could play a vital role in handling national security and foreign policy. Vance is an articulate speaker who can handle any and all inquiries on the spot, representing the administration with confidence and clarity. His ability to speak to complex issues while remaining grounded in the needs of everyday Americans will make him a strong voice for the administration. Whether managing infrastructure development or advocating for rural communities, Vance will bring both his knowledge and his experience to the forefront, helping the administration drive the changes that are needed for the country’s future. He is brilliant... As are many that Trump has surrounded himself with.
Let's hope that RFK Jr is not confirmed. He's a crackpot
She is an author of "Beyond the Stethoscope; Miracles in Medicine" which highlights miracles in medicine and the benefits of faith healing. For covid she advocated hydroxychloroquine and spread misinformation about vaccines.
There is a strong anti-science, anti-expert and anti-education steak in MAGA.
I don't know, can we look forward to her telling folks "pray on it" when they're sick?
How many of The architects of project 2025 have been chosen so far? I think it's up to 6? An absolute menagerie of misfits. These picks are humiliating to our country.
Trump spent his presidential campaign running from Project 2025. Now, he’s using it to stock his White House and administration.
MGT will head the Doge subcommittee. God this is laughable. The most incompetent member of Congress.The only ones truly laughing right now are those of us who are watching this spectacle unfold, live, as we witness the collapse of the Democratic Party. A party that has been brought to its knees by a man they tried to tear down with every cheap, underhanded tactic they've used for years—and even more. They gave it their all and failed spectacularly, making themselves look like utter fools in the process.
More from the dream team...
Pete Hegseth’s Mom Said He Abused ‘Many’ Women in Bombshell Email
“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say… get some help and take an honest look at yourself,” she wrote on April 30, 2018.
“I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around and uses women for his own power and ego.
“You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.”
The stunning email was obtained by The New York Times and published in a report on Friday night.
Hegseth’s mother also condemned his treatment of Samantha during their bitter divorce, writing: “For you to try to label her as ‘unstable’ for your own advantage is despicable and abusive. Is there any sense of decency left in you?
“She did not ask for or deserve any of what has come to her by your hand.
And if that wasn't enough...
Pete Hegseth was reportedly forced out of leadership roles at two prominent nonprofit advocacy groups after serious allegations of financial mismanagement, sexist behavior, and intoxication on the job.
In one particularly egregious incident at a Louisiana strip club, Hegseth allegedly attempted to join dancers on stage and needed to be physically restrained.
According to the report, his reckless behavior extended beyond public settings, fostering a workplace rife with sexism and impropriety.
Female staffers reportedly endured a toxic environment under Hegseth's leadership.
The entire email from his mother is here... Really scathing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/29/us/p … -text.html
Yuck.Room for one more in the clown car...
Kash Patel to head the FBI... The car is jam-packed with unqualified, dangerous, and downright bizarre nominations but this is perhaps the worst. So embarrassed for America.Kash wrote a children's book...get a load of this
https://youtu.be/CwBIL8Sngg4?si=CVRt4SSvn5XfK_DoLooks like the Hegseth nomination is going down in flames. The man needs to go away and get some help for himself....gosh maybe these folks should have been vetted?
Who's next? Patel , Kennedy and Gabbard all need to go.Shar,
Look at what Pete Hegseth explain the situation.
Even his mother explains what happened.
Just when you thought the mainstream media couldn't get any lower, they prove us wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ramsl9vfYDo
I believe Hegseth is out by the morning. He's grotesque and the fact he would put his mother through this BS is pretty pathetic.
trump world is looking for his replacement... Desanctimonious?What did Hegseth put his mother through, other than being a bad person?
I don't think he released the 1st email. He might have pressured her to 'react,' but that would be a guess.
GAYes it was the obvious pressure for her to react. A very uncomfortable and cringe-worthy performance on Fox this morning. If your mother is going around calling senators to talk you up, you're not the guy for the job.
For all the yammering about "Fake News" and "enemies of the people," how much would we know about Pete Hegseth's mistreatment of women and his apparent problem with alcohol if not for probing by intrepid journalists, who have done the vetting Trump did not?
This is why a free media is essential to a working democracy--to shine a bright light in dark corners.I am very confused due to reading reports like this ---- "The 2018 email from Penelope Hegseth, accusing her son of mistreating women, was shared by The New York Times as part of an article discussing Pete Hegseth's personal life. The email had been sent to him during a contentious period of his divorce, but Penelope later disavowed the claims, stating they were false and not reflective of his behavior"
I have confidence that he will be vetted. It's reported Trump has Ron waiting in the wings.Why couldn't he do some vetting of these nominees beforehand? Everything we have found out on these people has been through investigative journalism... The type trump often rails against and threatens to shut down. Is he trying to pull a fast one on the American people or is his team just that inept?
I guess I might just offer--- you might have to speak with Congress regarding those they affirm for jobs. Because they will be doing the vetting.
And Oh and the President of Mexico caved---Dec 2 --- Mexican authorities break up migrant caravans as Trump presidency looms
https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/mexico … residency/The president of Mexico has been breaking up caravans before she spoke with Trump. This has absolutely nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the Biden administration as she has stated previously. Your response, is exactly what Trump intended... Having folks believe his bluster amounted to action. Biden has been working with the Mexican president. Trump deserves absolutely no credit
We can revisit her comment to him...
"You may not be aware that Mexico has developed a comprehensive policy to assist migrants from different parts of the world who cross our territory en route to the southern border of the United States.
"As a result, and according to data from your country's Customs and Border Protection (CBP), encounters at the Mexico–United States border have decreased by 75% between December 2023 and November 2024.
"Moreover, half of those who arrive do so through a legally scheduled appointment under the United States' CBP One program. For these reasons, migrant caravans no longer arrive at the border."
No caving .
"Mexico Goes into Overdrive to Help Biden-Harris Administration Slow Illegal Immigration..."
"How Mexico's 'El Carrusel' has helped U.S. border crossings drop to a four-year low"
"The Other Busing Program: Mexico Is Pushing Migrants Back South"
Trump will not be allowed to bloviate and claim credit when he has had absolutely no impact.
"Immigrants caught in Mexico's 'Merry-Go-Round'". The Mexican Government is routinely bussing immigrants to their southern states before they can reach the U.S. border.
https://www.latintimes.com/how-mexicos- … low-559463
https://www.fairus.org/news/executive/m … mmigration
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/14/worl … order.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/immigrants-c … 08086.htmlFirst of all, all of your links and articles outline a timeline starting in the summer of 2024. That’s pretty telling and honestly laughable that you would present them. The president of Mexico only seemed to start cooperating with Biden in the summer Aug, and Sept of 2024—really? LOL. Again, I don’t have the time, nor am I willing to feed into your endless rumination. In the end, your argument makes little sense. This Biden ploy, timed perfectly for the summer while his VP was campaigning, was clearly meant to allow him to say, "We’ve cut the numbers at the border." If you want to buy into that, that’s your prerogative. As for me, I see it as a cheap, silly ploy. That idiot let in 10 million migrants, and that fact bothers me. It’s clear you’re just making excuses for Biden.
And it is clear that the new president would have cooperated. She certainly would have done anything she could to help Harris win. She new what was to come if Trump won.First of all, all of your links and articles outline a timeline starting in the summer of 2024. That’s pretty telling and honestly laughable that you would present them.
My links are to show that caravans and efforts to break them up by Mexico and the Biden administration together were in effect before Trump's current comment.
Why was I trying to establish that cooperation between the current administration in Mexico have been established previously? Because you made the comment that the Mexican president only currently "caved"because of Trump's social media comment about their conversation. That she has recently as today or yesterday broke up a caravan due to Trump's words but that is not correct because Mexico has been breaking up caravans before Trump's commentary. My links show that to be the case. No credit due to Trump."My links are to show that caravans and efforts by Mexico and the Biden administration together were in effect before Trump's current comment."
I’m just pointing out that Biden did nothing for almost four years, and only took steps to slow the flow when the presidential campaign heated up. I’m not sure why anyone would even bring this up in a conversation. You provided four links to show he did nothing until the summer of 2024, but I’m asking—why then? Why not four years ago?
Here is the article I posted that reports
Dec 2, 2024
"Migrants rights activist Luis García Villagrán said the breaking-up of the two caravans appeared to be part of an agreement between the president of Mexico and the president-elect of the United States, the Associated Press reported.
The action came shortly after President Claudia Sheinbaum and President-elect Trump discussed Trump’s threat to impose 25% tariffs on all Mexican products entering the United States unless Mexico does more to stem the flow of migrants to the U.S. border.
While Trump insisted Sheinbaum had agreed to stop all unauthorized migration to the United States, Mexico’s president disputed that claim, saying “Mexico’s position is not to close borders but to build bridges between governments and between peoples.”
Instead, Sheinbaum wrote on her social media accounts, “migrants and caravans are taken care of before they reach the border.”
Blocking the caravans
Undocumented migrants have been detected in record numbers so far this year. Mexican authorities reported finding 925,085 migrants from January through August of this year, an increase of 132% over the 398,991 during the first eight months of 2023.
The AP reported that immigration authorities and the Army had dismantled the two caravans — comprising approximately 4,000 migrants — by bussing them to cities across central and southern Mexico while also offering 20-day transit documents.
Rights activists are warning migrants not to be deceived by the INM offer, reported the publication Infobae.
The National Immigration Institute (INM) responded by issuing a statement on Saturday saying the migrants voluntarily accepted bus rides “to various areas where there is medical assistance and where their migratory status will be reviewed,” and insisting the migrants “no longer wanted to face the risks along their way.”
The is a current report by AP --- The president most certainly is, as the article claims, working with Trump.I can see there were efforts back in 2021 between the two countries to address migration.
"Migrant caravan: Mexico presses US to reform immigration policies...In Joe Biden's campaign, he offered to finalise immigration reform and I hope that he is able to achieve this. That is what I hope."
He said his government would try to dissuade migrants from crossing into Mexico but added that the rights of all migrants must be respected."
"Biden and Mexico to Cooperate on Migration Despite Tension"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-and- … 1612889054
In the end, it is not Mexico's responsibility to address our immigration laws. Our Congress needs to do that. Continuing to put Band-Aids that are quickly ripped off by the courts is not a solution.The president most certainly is, as the article claims, working with Trump
Everything mentioned in the article is a continuation of what they had already been doing. Has absolutely nothing to do with trump. The articles I cited from earlier in the year show that caravans have been broken up prior to trump's bloviating. Where does the article state that the president of Mexico is reacting from the phone call with trump? Mexico is simply continuing to do what it has been doing for the past several months... Actually before trump even won the election. He can absolutely not take credit.
Who nominates someone without knowing what skeletons are going to be drug out of the closet?
"And Oh and the President of Mexico caved---Dec 2 --- Mexican authorities break up migrant caravans as Trump presidency looms"
No. The Mexican government has been breaking up caravans for months now.
Shar,
We've been down this path before.
They are trying to do to Pete Hegseth what the did to Brett Kavanaugh for his confirmation hearing. They've done the same thing to President Donald Trump. They've done it so many time, people are no longer taken in by their allegations.
There really are no true journalists who pursue the truth in the mainstream media.
It's all yellow journalism. It's a shame, but when the left is down this far, it's all they have.Yup.
The Mainstream media is not interested in digging for facts, its 100% propaganda these days.
The conflicts globally are beginning to escalate out of control, North Korea, South Korea, Russia, Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Israel... half of Africa...Seems like the facts were laid bare on Hegseth... Accused of sexual assault, drove 2 vets organizations into the ground, public intoxication, climbing on stage with strippers, Fox colleagues saying he rolled in to work smelling of alcohol and his own mama telling him he should clean up his ways. Media did the job trump didn't want to do.
The current Administration is fast tracking WWIII into existence...
You realize a third of the world is either at war or threatening war right now?
You think it matters what Hegseth, who hasn't even been confirmed, is accused of?
We might not make it there as a civilization... Nuclear War could be an hour from now... with Biden and Harris at the helm for 40 more days... chances are we don't make it to a Trump Administration.
Yes, Mike, I was using a bit of sarcasm in my comment to Willow. We have seen these ploys too many times to count. I agree, today we have very few true journalists. I was just pointing out in another comment that CNN and MSNBC are on the last leg. The ratings are breaking all time low records.
I disagree.
This is because the misinformation of journalists, telling a grain of the story that fits their narrative and excluding all the important details of the story.
It's called yellow journalism.
In journalism, yellow journalism and the yellow press are American newspapers that use eye-catching headlines and sensationalized exaggerations for increased sales.Nah, Pete is a flawed candidate and a troubled human being. His mother, his colleagues have told us so, along with the police report detailing sexual assault. But it's not like the man is even qualified for the position in terms of skill or experience. He is simply a man that Trump pulled from central casting because he saw him on TV and liked his look.
Why isn't Trump vetting these people? He doesn't want us to know of the skeletons in their closets? Thank goodness for journalism. Nothing "yellow" about the coverage of pete.There is no public evidence that Pete Hegseth was criminally charged with sexual abuse. A woman accused him of sexual misconduct during an incident in Monterey, California, in 2017. The police reportedly investigated the claims but did not pursue charges. Hegseth later paid the accuser as part of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), citing concerns about the impact on his career. Hegseth has maintained that the encounter was consensual and denied all wrongdoing. The details remain contested, and no legal action was taken against him
The man is, deservedly, circling the drain..
Shar,
I believe what Senator Lindsay Graham said covers the allegations about Pete Hegseth.
“I’m not going to make any decision based on an anonymous source. If you are not willing to raise your hand under oath to make the accusation, it doesn’t count,” Graham told Sean Hannity. “None of it counts, no rumors, no innuendo.”
That is all they have are rumors and innuendos. NO facts.
I bet if I was sent to do a story about anyone on the forum, and I focused on people who did not like them for some reason, and published what they said anonymously, as if it were fact, not give them a chance to respond, and treated what was said about them as fact, THEN they would better understand what is being done to Pete Hegseth.
I have a special understanding for him. He is a combat soldier. He served in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as earing two bronze stars for bravery. Few people understand what is takes to endure these experiences. I get upset when people have NO actual evidence to defame such a man. He is to be admired and respected for what he has done.Well his mom did go on the record...
Son,
I have tried to keep quiet about your character and behavior, but after listening to the way you made Samantha feel today, I cannot stay silent. And as a woman and your mother I feel I must speak out..
You are an abuser of women — that is the ugly truth and I have no respect for any man that belittles, lies, cheats, sleeps around, and uses women for his own power and ego. You are that man (and have been for years) and as your mother, it pains me and embarrasses me to say that, but it is the sad, sad truth.
I am not a saint, far from it.. so don’t throw that in my face,. but your abuse over the years to women (dishonesty, sleeping around, betrayal, debasing, belittling) needs to be called out.
Sam is a good mother and a good person (under the circumstances that you created) and I know deep down you know that. For you to try to label her as “unstable” for your own advantage is despicable and abusive. Is there any sense of decency left in you? She did not ask for or deserve any of what has come to her by your hand. Neither did Meredith.
I know you think this is one big competition and that we have taken her side… bunk… we are on the side of good and that is not you. (Go ahead and call me self-righteous, I dont’ care)
Don’t you dare run to her and cry foul that we shared with us… that’s what babies do. It’s time for someone (I wish it was a strong man) to stand up to your abusive behavior and call it out, especially against women
We still love you, but we are broken by your behavior and lack of character. I don’t want to write emails like this and never thought I would. If it damages our relationship further, then so be it, but at least I have said my piece. [Redacted]
And yes, we are praying for you (and you don’t deserve to know how we are praying, so skip the snarky reply)
I don’t want an answer to this… I don’t want to debate with you. You twist and abuse everything I say anyway. But… On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say… get some help and take an honest look at yourself…
Mom
Yep. Get yourself some help Pete."Penelope Hegseth, appearing on "Fox & Friends" Wednesday morning, said her son and his wife at the time were going through a "very difficult divorce" when she wrote the email in 2018, noting that she wrote it "in haste" and with "deep emotions."
"I wrote that out of love," she said. "And about two hours later, I retracted it with an apology email, but nobody's seen that."
Hegseth's mother said in the email, published by The New York Times, that she was writing on "behalf of all the women (and I know it's many) you have abused in some way," telling her son to "get some help and take an honest look at yourself."
But Hegseth's mother said she was appearing Wednesday on Fox to "tell the truth" to the American people, and to Republican senators on the hill — "especially our female senators."
Hegseth's mother encouraged the senators to "listen to Pete," noting that part of the reason she appeared on Fox was to "discredit the media." She added that she called Fox on Tuesday saying she wanted to speak out on the issue, noting that "I would do anything for my son."
Hegseth's mother repeatedly defended her son during the appearance on Wednesday, saying he has changed and noting that "if we all went back seven years, we would see that maybe we are not the people we are today."
This is from CBS news.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pete-hegse … ald-trump/
Fox news did an even better job with his mother.
One Email from his emotional mother from SEVEN years ago really amounts to nothing.Where is the email where she takes it all back?
trump’s nominees are without an iota of doubt the most appalling collection of choices any president has made to lead federal government departments...Well... now you know how many have felt about the incompetent corrupt cabal that has been destroying our country for the last 4 years.
The most appalling collection any Administration had put together in living memory.Yellow journalism is not interested in getting the story. They are only interested in getting items that get headlines and support their goals. His mother's retracted Email...if there is one...she could have called him is of no interest to the failed left journalists of the NYT. It would be mentioned if they were interested in getting the story and not supporting an agenda. The NYT has NO real journalists.
Why is the New York Times the only one who can get the story? Is Fox not capable of publishing an email where she supposedly took back everything she said? Or such an email just not available? Where is fox or oann or newsmax or any of the other right wing outlets in pursuing the story? You would think that they would want to back up her claim during her fox interview... Guess not.
You need to read Fox News, Newsmax and see the many stories they have done about this.
His mother is not the story.His mother claims she takes it all back and she wrote an email stating so but she doesn't want to show that email? It would certainly lend a little credibility to her statement but oh well... Followers don't seem to require credibility.
I offered her a link to Fox's interview with Pete's Mom where she explained the email, as well as another email she sent her son two hours after sending the scathing email. Can't get a better explanation than from his mom lives on the tube.
Where is the transcript, the actual follow up email? She says she followed up her first scathing email where she apparently told Pete exactly what she thought of him with some sort of retraction? Where is that?
Well the first one where she roasted her son was easily found, but not the second one where she takes it all back?
I must say, you very easily assume this woman is lying. -----What about your guy Joe? He lied over, and over, and over about pardoning his son. Oh, I should have picked u by now, you don't see lies if they are inconvenient to your narrative.
Oh no, not suspicious at all that she talks about a follow-up email but doesn't want to produce it.
As far as Biden's pardon, faced with the zealots potentially coming into positions of power in the Trump administration.... A change of mind is is completely understandable.
When JD Vance called Trump America's Hitler, when Rubio called Trump a con man, when RFK Jr called Trump a “threat to democracy,” a “bully,” and, as recently as July, a “terrible president.”. when Tulsi called him "Saudi Arabia’s bitch”. Since a shift in perspective or change of mind is not possible... Were they lying then or now?She owes no one anything. She stepped up and verbally explained the email. Your mindset escapes me. Whatever
I have found nothing in regards to anyone even asking her to show the second email. Where did you find that?
It's challenging to engage with your approach as it often redirects the conversation or creates negativity. You contradict yourself, such as justifying a shift in perspective for Biden’s pardon due to fears of potential Trump zealots. But when figures like JD Vance, Marco Rubio, RFK Jr., or Tulsi Gabbard reversed their harsh critiques of Trump, it raises the question: were they dishonest then, or are they now? Acknowledging all people can change their minds without selective judgment might lead to more constructive discussions. I find your comment hypocritical.
Was Biden lying now or the other 10 times he lied about the Biden word?
Your comment illustrates the inconsistency in political rhetoric. It's a tactic often employed to shift narratives depending on the situation, which I find characteristic of certain political strategies. Hopefully, this example clarifies what I meant about the up-is-down, down-is-up mindset.my post pertaining to people changing their stance or opinion on an issue was a direct response to your post calling Biden a liar for previously stating he would not pardon his son and then going on to change his stance on the issue
I was only pointing out that it seemed okay with many that kennedy, tulsi, vance and others have most certainly done an about face from opinions of the past but for some reason they're not called liars.
You contradict yourself, such as justifying a shift in perspective for Biden’s pardon due to fears of potential Trump zealots. But when figures like JD Vance, Marco Rubio, RFK Jr., or Tulsi Gabbard reversed their harsh critiques of Trump, it raises the question: were they dishonest then, or are they now? Acknowledging all people can change their minds without selective judgment might lead to more constructive discussions. I find your comment hypocritical.
Again... Biden is labeled a liar but your advancing the idea that Tulsi and the others should be cut some slack and people should acknowledge that their opinions, very harsh opinions could change?
Yes, it does seem a bit hypocritical.Calling someone a name is not the same as pardoning a crime. There is a significant difference between expressing an opinion, however rude or untrue, and taking official legal action like issuing a pardon. Sharing a view or calling someone a derogatory name, while potentially harmful or offensive, doesn’t carry legal consequences. Pardon, however, involves an act of executive authority to forgive a crime, often after legal processes have taken place. Your analogy isn't quite appropriate because it conflates two very different actions—one a matter of free speech and the other a formal, legal decision.
As for the second email question, I'm not sure who asked Pete's mom if she could "cough up" the second email. Could you provide where you heard she was asked for the second email?The mother's follow-up email does not exist, otherwise it would have been found, just like the first one or she would produce it herself to try and lend some credibility to her story. Absolutely any and every outlet would be willing to publish the follow-up email.
The truth is in the details.
She never said she put it in an email. It could have been done with a phone call.
I take her at her word.She never said she put it in an email.
Yes she did... "I retracted it with an apology email"
https://youtu.be/ypF0DfZJbMU?si=6BbakM71CdEYNSPq
Joe is a liar... Not allowed to change a stance or opinion but Tulsi, Vance, Rubio, Kennedy and many others can reverse course on their previous very foul statements about Trump?
Her statement was made live on Fox --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zInPLEM33WA
Also ---- Penelope Hegseth made her statement disavowing the contents of her initial email and defending her son in an interview with The New York Times. She explained that the email was written in anger during a stressful time and described her son as a good father and husband. She also criticized the publication of the private email as "disgustingWhy doesn't she provide the email though?
If you actually listened to her, she was straightforward in her explanation. She doesn’t owe you or anyone else anything beyond what she felt comfortable offering. Honestly, who keeps old emails for years anyway? Since you’re so fixated on lies, what’s your take on Joe Biden blatantly lying at least 10 times about not pardoning his son? How do you feel about his outright falsehoods?
In 2018, Pete Hegseth's mother, Penelope Hegseth, sent him an email accusing him of mistreating women and urged him to reflect on his actions. She later clarified that the email was written in anger during a stressful period in her son's personal life. Penelope subsequently apologized, disavowing the contents of her initial message and defending her son's character. She described him as a good father and husband and criticized the publication of the private email as "disgusting"
Lindsey Graham and I share the same frustration when it comes to baseless accusations. I have no patience for anyone who accuses someone of a crime without evidence and then scrambles to find proof while smearing the accused. It’s unacceptable. Pete wasn’t charged because the woman clearly had no evidence of a crime—otherwise, charges would have been filed. We’re in a dangerous era where people can make accusations without facts or evidence, and it’s deeply troubling.
A prime example is the two Trump impeachments, which highlight how a certain segment of society operates with a skewed and sick mindset, embracing a "whatever it takes" mentality. Trump’s victory seems to have triggered them, and frankly, they should be ignored, not given a platform.
On a broader scale, we’re witnessing the downfall of left-leaning media. CNN and MSNBC are either heading for collapse or a complete overhaul. It’s time to replace the extremists with people who have some common sense. I take satisfaction in seeing the talking heads from these networks nervous about their jobs—it’s a long-overdue reckoning.
I, too, have faced the harsh realities of war and have come to understand the resilience it takes to endure and return home with challenges that many cannot fully comprehend. My husband served in combat during Vietnam, where he not only fought a brutal war overseas but also came back to face another battle—a war waged against him by certain individuals who had the audacity to call themselves Americans.
MSNBC And CNN Ratings Slashed In Half Post-Election---- ask yourself why? https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2 … -election/
https://www.yahoo.com/news/msnbc-posts- … 29232.html
The lights will soon go out on fake newsI'm speaking to journalism, investigative journalism. The outlets mentioned in your post and fox would be in the same category are what I would call "infotainment". Yes they attract a lot of people because they are simplistic in their approach. But they are not journalism and certainly not investigative journalism.
I didn't realize that he signed up for Gitmo after receiving an Ivy League education.
He then went on to Iraq, and then to Afghanistan. That's admirable! He is a war fighter and fully understands what that means! He is perfect for the position, and just what our Country (and fighting men and women) need right now!
As far as his past (outside of the bogus claims) he admits his mistakes and his testimony is that his current wife, and Jesus Christ, changed him!
I believe him, and believe that he will have the fight of Trump, to stand up to the battle which is ahead of him.
https://youtu.be/Ramsl9vfYDo?si=9iX3ZMFXgwQTwX_IAmen---
I hope you had the chance to watch the Patriot Awards last night—it was truly uplifting to see such genuine joy and positivity in that crowd. Even when I’m out and about, I sense a shift in the atmosphere. It feels like people are breathing easier, perhaps relieved by Trump’s win. Personally, I feel as though a tremendous burden has been lifted off my shoulders.
Hegseth resigned from nonprofit groups after sexual misconduct and financial mismanagement allegations... trumps nominee for secretary of defense, parted ways with two nonprofit veteran organizations due to allegations of drunken sexual misconduct and draining one of the organizations’ finances, according to a whistleblower report.
Hegseth was forced out of the organization due to a pattern of drunken behavior at work events and lewd and sexual misconduct toward women in the organization.
The seven-page report was sent to CVA senior management in February 2015, which includes accounts of Hegseth having to be restrained while attempting to get onstage with strippers at a strip club in Louisiana, sexually pursuing women in the organization, and dividing them into “party girls” and “not party girls.” All the while, he was married to his second wife.
Between 2013 and 2015, Hegseth was “seen drunk at multiple CVA events,” even after the organization had implemented a no-drinking policy in October 2014. This decision followed a Memorial Day incident in which Hegseth was seen “totally sloshed” at a CVA event in Virginia Beach and needed to be carried to his room. His behavior was witnessed by several high-profile people who were “very disappointed to see this kind of public behavior,” according to the report.
Despite the no-drinking policy implemented at work events, Hegseth was “noticeably intoxicated” at a Christmas party at the Grand Hyatt in Washington in December 2014.
Another report not included in the seven-page report accused Hegseth of screaming, “Kill all Muslims,” multiple times at a bar in Sheraton Suites Hotel in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio. The incident allegedly occurred on May 29, 2015, while Hegseth was traveling with the organization’s Defend Freedom Tour.
just two years into Hegseth being installed as the organization’s leader. By 2008, it was reviewed that the organization was unable to pay back its creditors. This came at a time when donors were concerned that funds were being used to fund parties and “trysts.”
Hegseth took responsibility for the financial mismanagement of the organization and said the group would need to file for bankruptcy....
And this is the guy who should lead our Department of defense? My God.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli … legations/The majority of these claims are via anonymous sources. As to the drinking and womanizing in his past (watch the interview I've shared) he gives full credit for the man he is TODAY to his wife and to Jesus Christ, his Lord and Savior.
Is there no one available in the Trump orbit who doesn't have a closet full of gross skeletons? Is that too much to ask? But beyond that, isn't there anyone in Trump World who has even a modicum of experience for the jobs they're being nominated to? I'm beginning to think that his ego is driving these picks. No one should look smarter, more qualified or have fewer scandals than he does.
My neighbor found Christ also but I sure as hell don't want to see him in the government..."My neighbor found Christ also but I sure as hell don't want to see him in the government..."
Did your Christian neighbor also serve at Gitmo, in Iraq, and in Afghanistan?
Is your neighbor a born leader?
If not, you really can't compare the two, can you?A born leader? How is Hegseth a born leader? Because of his military service? Plenty have served longer than he has, in more difficult circumstances than he has. The man has also shown poor leadership skills as he was driven out of two vets organizations that he ran, one of them going into bankruptcy...
Again,
"A seven-page whistleblower report"
This is known as hearsay.
There are no facts here. Just second hand information from an unknown source.
It's nothing and anybody who wants the truth would ignore it.
We've seen this too many times before.Oh my, the view of whistleblowers and their credibility sure was a whole lot different in the days of Jordan and Comer's parade of whistleblowers. Lol
And certainly the senators could bring these whistleblowers in to question... The American public absolutely loves a good whistleblowerLet them take an oath to tell the truth and testify in front of the Senate committee.
Then, I may think it is something worth considering.
I don't think it will happen.
And let's not forget about tulsi
Nearly 100 former national security officials signed a letter to Senate leaders raising concerns about President-elect Trump's nomination of former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard to serve as director of national intelligence.
The former officials urged Thune and Schumer to hold closed-door hearings to review "all information available to the U.S. government" regarding Gabbard.
The former officials added that if confirmed, Gabbard would be the "least experienced" person to hold the position since the role was created, noting her lack of executive branch and managerial experience.
https://www.axios.com/2024/12/06/trump- … ngs-letterYou have made this a full time job haven't you? I don't have that much time on my hands.
I've no doubt that the dinosaurs and the RINOS are meeting behind many a closed door over Trump's picks.Actually it really doesn't take any time at all
Another letter signed by the professionals? It should go in the book, right next to the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation letter.
GAHas professionalism, experience and expertise really come to mean so little these days? Sure does seem like it. Throw science onto that ash heap also. Why visit my doctor when I may be able to consult my plumber who's up on the latest "alternative medicines"? Or tune in to an old episode of Dr. Oz touting the green coffee bean? Or better yet.. shut down my Wi-Fi because it might be controlling my behavior as Kennedy suggests...geesh!
I must ask--- how are these 100 former national security officials?
Not sure why you would bring this up--- I mean you had to know this was coming. Or did you forget the Dems frequently send letters signed by FORMER whoever? This is a ploy out of their book 'Silly Little Ploys We Try To Pull". How does one support such a party? No Really
Let me refer to a letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials in October 2020. These officials, including former CIA directors and high-ranking intelligence figures, suggested that the discovery of Hunter Biden's laptop had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."
This letter was released during the final weeks of the 2020 presidential campaign and was widely cited to cast doubt on the authenticity of the laptop's contents, which included emails and other materials reportedly implicating Hunter Biden in controversial business dealings.
The controversy deepened when it was later revealed that the laptop was not part of a Russian disinformation campaign, as some reporting verified its authenticity. Critics accused the signatories of political bias and attempting to influence the election by casting doubt on a story damaging to Joe Biden, Trump’s opponent at the time. This led to accusations that intelligence officials had misused their authority to sway public opinion against Trump indirectly.
Please explain why they did this.Again I'm not sure why you would bring this up--- I mean you had to know this was coming. Or did you forget the Dems frequently send letters signed by FORMER whoever? This is a ploy out of their book 'Silly Little Ploys We Try To Pull". How does one support such a party? No Really
It doesn't matter, she says she did. It was a personal email to her son, attempting to get through to him!
I, too, have written such emails to one of my sons, when he was going through a rough patch.Like the old saying goes, "Those who know him the best support him the most."
I am confident Pete Hegseth will be confirmed. You can let anonymous sources dictate who gets to hold office.
"Dozens of prominent veterans sign onto letter supporting 'outstanding' Hegseth nomination amid controversies
EXCLUSIVE: A growing number of prominent veterans are signing onto an open letter endorsing Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth as he battles back allegations that may stymie his confirmation.
The Heritage Foundation began collecting the signatures on Thursday and garnered more than 74 in that short time, a foundation official told Fox News Digital.
"As military veterans and patriotic Americans, we are pleased to see an outstanding veteran nominated to lead the Department of Defense," the letter begins.
"Hegseth is a decorated combat veteran who served as an Infantry Officer in the Army National Guard, deploying overseas to combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan, earning two Bronze Stars and a Combat Infantryman Badge."
The veterans state that Hegseth has "worked tirelessly" to support U.S. troops and that his experience and drive will lead him in rebuilding the military back to a "fighting force . . . capable of defending the national security interests of the American people."
They cite Hegseth’s long-held stance on "depoliticizing" the military and his rebuttals of "DEI"-type policies and other "toxic ideologies" they claim have been foisted upon troops in recent years.
"Ending wokeness is just the start. The Pentagon is also bloated with bureaucracy and waste. The defense industrial base is failing to deliver," the veterans wrote.
"Cost overruns and delays have become the norm. The Department of Defense needs a Secretary of Defense willing to confront both the entrenched bureaucracy and the defense industry and force them to deliver the ships, planes, and munitions our troops need to confront America’s adversaries."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dozens … troversiesThese are the people whose opinions should really be valued when it comes to picking a Secretary of Defense.
"Navy SEALs, Veterans to March for Hegseth Confirmation
There are more than 100 Navy SEAL veterans and war fighters reportedly planning to march to support him on the first day of his confirmation hearing.
The Navy SEAL Foundation's Bill Brown is organizing the event akin to his annual Navy SEAL Hudson River Swim.
"Pete Hegseth has been a monumental part of promoting that Navy SEALs Swim," podcast host Alec Lace said this week. "He swam across the Hudson River a number of years in a row. And so he's been a big advocate for the Navy SEALs, and now that he needs help, the Navy SEALs and Bill Brown has turned around, and they are going to be helping Pete Hegseth in any way that they can."
The march plan began with an email blast from Brown to his Navy SEALs Swim participants and "the response was immediate and overwhelming," according to Lace.
"Now the veteran community and, in particular, the SEAL community is going to be there to have Pete's back," Lace said on "The Alec Lace Show."
Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, has come under fire among Trump backers and Hegseth supporters for not coming out unequivocally to say she supports Hegseth for defense secretary, but she is now at least saying she is willing to listen.
Ernst is one of several Senate Republicans who control the fate of Hegseth, an infantry combat veteran and former TV weekend host who spent the past week on Capitol Hill trying to win the support of Republican senators who would need to confirm him to lead the Pentagon.
Trump told NBC's "Meet the Press" in an interview recorded Friday that he believes Hegseth will be confirmed and that senators have called him to tell him that Hegseth is fantastic.
"Pete is doing well now," Trump said in the interview airing Sunday. "I mean, people were a little bit concerned. He's a young guy with a tremendous track record."
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/defen … d/1190824/The leader of the dream team...
The posts after midnight are the most inane.
"The Democrats are fighting hard to get rid of the Popular Vote in future Elections. They want all future Presidential Elections to be based exclusively on the Electoral College!"
What is going on here? Sundowning? Or does he really not understand the election process?
The delusion continues.
A criminal president in 1976 was replaced by a genuinely good person.
Is there someone out there to repair the damage already being done by the new criminal president?
What is being written on this site by some of the most delusional people I've encountered in my 71 years is a sad commentary on our once great nation. And I'm sure it will only get worse.WATCH LIVE: Pete Hegseth testifies at Senate confirmation hearing for defense secretary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2LqUvjWHoYPainful, preposterous, insulting, degrading, incompetent. The list of words to describe this horror story of a candidate to lead our DOD is so long it staggers the mind. I'm deeply horrified at the whole idea of this unqualified man leading the proud institutions that we rely upon to defend us.
Trump's choice of Hegseth was solely meant to demonstrate to Congress just how abjectly subservient they are and to then rub their noses in it...
The hearing was a sh*tshow...and the fact that Hegseth did not find the time to meet with Senate Democrats on the committee speaks volumes.
He couldn't answer whether he would shoot protesters in the leg, accept military orders to invade Greenland or if someone should resign if drinking on the job....
What else does anyone need to know.
Next up from Central Casting... Pam Bondi.As of January 26, 2025, the following individuals nominated by President Donald Trump have been confirmed by the Senate for key positions in his administration:
Secretary of State: Marco Rubio
Secretary of Defense: Pete Hegseth
Secretary of Homeland Security: Kristi Noem
John Ratcliffe: Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)It'll be very interesting to see how Little Marco performs. He is one of the few that has experience
Secretary of State Rubio will impress like all the rest!!
Well fingers crossed for Pete hegseth that he can keep his promise of not drinking while on the job... Might be important.
I watched the full hearing last night, and I thought he did really well. He answered every question, and his responses seemed very honest—nothing like the usual political BS you expect from these types of hearings. The Washington swamp, though... they clearly see him as a big threat. I’m sure the political donations from the food, farming, and pharmaceutical industries are making them nervous right now. I really hope he makes it. I believe he’d be a huge asset.
Another in the menagerie of misfits... He didn't understand the differences between Medicare and Medicaid..
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did voice his opinions on healthcare in the hearing. Putting his focus has generally been on broader issues like vaccine safety, environmental concerns, and corporate influence on public health. While he has expressed criticism about the healthcare system and pharmaceutical companies, he did not specifically address the detailed complexities of Medicare and Medicaid abuses. However, given his background in environmental law and public health, it’s possible that he would understand the larger concerns surrounding these programs, especially regarding their sustainability, fairness, and effectiveness for vulnerable populations.
It is clear you are picking up blurbs from media, and did not watch the hearing.
"Another in the menagerie of misfits.." Willow
I don’t appreciate your casual way of insulting strangers. It’s not acceptable in the way I communicate. As I’ve mentioned before, I understand that many on the left speak this way, but I find it a turn-off for any meaningful conversation.Maybe you could remind us of posters on this forum "casually insulting" Biden? And others on the left? There are many, many instances. They would certainly be a stranger to them... I don't think my speech comes across any differently than those of the posters on this forum under the Biden administration... But there's a problem if I take the same sword y'all used to carve him up and turn it on Trump? Sorry I'm not buying it.
RFK was woefully unprepared for his questioning. His honesty is also in question because he attempted to deny so many statements that are on video or have been recorded otherwise... Wasn't a great look for him.
"It is clear you are picking up blurbs from media, and did not watch the hearing."
LOL watched the whole painful thing. Folks probably shouldn't make assumptions.
I’ve been watching the U.S. confirmation hearings, and something has really shifted—something deeper than just the usual political drama. It’s not just about the kinds of people being appointed or a simple ‘vibe shift.’ There’s something bigger happening, and I finally put my finger on it.
The movement is turning on itself.
Even Democrats are starting to wake up as they watch their heroes from the past few decades turn on the very people who could’ve breathed new life into their party—the ones who should’ve been the next wave of Democratic leadership. RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard stand out as prime examples, and yet seasoned power players like Bernie Sanders are pulling every trick from their old playbook to tear them down. The same tired smear tactics, the same worn-out weapons they’ve used for years—except now, it's backfiring.
Now, they spew out nonsensical questions, their voices scratching and strained, faces contorted in frustration and desperation as if the very act of asking them is a battle they’re losing. The lines, obviously rehearsed, lose all power, falling flat with every utterance, like hollow echoes of a narrative that no longer resonates.
The old revolutionary guard is trying to devour its own, but instead, they’re the ones getting swallowed up. They have become nothing but shadows no one notices, even when they are snarling and screaming.
These hearings are making one thing clear: MAGA isn’t just a Republican movement. It’s a unity movement—bringing together the best of both sides to push the country forward while leaving the corrupt establishment behind.Amen Shar, I would add, MAGA is a common sense movement!
If you can't think outside of the political box or bubble, you'll be left behind, making excuses and continuing to play... the blame game.It's not that the democrats are turning on themselves. It's very simple. The majority of congress in both the house and the senate is republican and Trumpers.
It does not matter what grilling is done my by the democrats and what they uncover about Tulsi and JFK and others who are totally unqualified for the jobs they have been nominated for.
They will be confirmed by the majority of the GOP. And if they are not, there will be hell to pay from Trump himself. They run scared, so they will do whatever he wishes.I agree, I think it’s important to highlight some of the positive actions the new administration is taking. There are a lot of great things happening that aren’t always being reported. With so much being accomplished, it’s hard to keep up. In just 10 days, a lot has changed, and in my view, Trump has jumped right in, working quickly and decisively to get things done. His team is also working hard alongside him. I believe he’s surrounded himself with people who share his passion and strong work ethic. We’re definitely on the path to draining the swamp and making America a better place.
My faith remains very strong.
Draining The SWAMP!
Making media fair again...
BREAKING: In a move to diversify media representation within the Pentagon, the Department of Defense has introduced the "Annual Media Rotation Program." This initiative aims to provide various media outlets the opportunity to operate from within the Pentagon, thereby enriching the spectrum of journalistic perspectives on defense matters.
Under this program, established media organizations such as The New York Times, National Public Radio (NPR), NBC News, and Politico will vacate their office spaces by February 14, 2025. These spaces will then be allocated to The New York Post, One America News Network (OANN), Breitbart News Network, and HuffPost. The Department emphasizes that this rotation is designed to allow new outlets the unique opportunity to report as resident members of the Pentagon Press Corps. OH YEAH!
Making America Safe Again
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has indicated that the U.S. military may conduct special operations against Mexican drug cartels. This follows President Donald Trump's executive order on January 20, 2025, designating these cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. In a recent interview, Secretary Hegseth stated that "all options will be on the table" when addressing the threat posed by these cartels. --- Long over due.
Way to go Pete...Let's hope the man is maintaining his sobriety and keeping his promise not to drink while on the job... Way to slant the coverage all in one direction.... Absolute trash. With Trump's tariffs, weaponization of the FBI/DOJ we've got a lot more to focus on than the BS coverage Breitbart is going to be putting out from the Pentagon...
"Annual Media Rotation Program."
hmmm . . . could the key words be 'Annual & Rotation'? Doesn't sound like any epic win to me. It is just a matter of being the first period of a 'Rotation'. Besides the HuffPost is progressive. Maybe I got it wrong.It was announced that 400 journalists would be considered for inclusion in the White House Press Department's new initiative. These will include journalists from all ideological groups, which seems to be an effort to bring a diverse range of perspectives to the table. By including reporters with different viewpoints, the administration likely aims to create a more balanced and open dialogue during press briefings.
In my view, the number 400 is a significant effort to broaden the pool, ensuring that a variety of voices—both new and established—have the opportunity to report on the administration. It’s a step toward reshaping how the White House communicates with the public through the media.Yup, that is what I got out of several articles I read. Seems fair to me. It comes down to office space from what I understand and has no bearing on reporting or affecting audience reach. A matter of convenience? Correct me if I am wrong.
They’re rotating people, which will probably upset some of those who have already been in the pool.
I’m curious if we’ll start hearing more relevant questions as a result. It’ll be interesting to see how this all plays out. It is frustrating to hear the same question being asked over and over.From my understanding the Press Corps isn't changing. It is coveted office space usage only that is affected. So, I imagine questions will be from the same reporters.
“To be clear, the outlets that vacate the spaces loaned to them” by the defense secretary “will remain as full members of the Pentagon Press Corps,” Ullyot [Pentagon spokesman] wrote. “They will continue to enjoy the same media access to the Pentagon and will be able to attend and cover briefings and be considered for travel with civilian and military leaders in the Department as they have previously. The only change will be giving up their physical workspaces in the building to allow new outlets to have their turn to become resident members of the Pentagon Press Corps.”The Pentagon Press Corps is likely to remain separate from the White House Press Corps, as their primary focus areas—military and defense versus the president and executive branch—are distinct. However, the White House introducing changes to its press policies that involve increasing access to the media or restructuring how the press interacts with the administration may have influenced the Pentagon Press Corps as well, their desire for greater transparency or expanded media shows this.
During the Friday White House press briefing, several new faces and voices were present, reflecting the administration's initiative to diversify media representation.
Making America Solvent Again (MASA) Savings of one billion in 10 days on the job.
Impressive! Is it the froth on top of a cappuccino? BTW . . . who gets credit? Trump or Musk?
Hopefully, Gernell will make progress on immigration problems, and Venezuela will agree to take back their citizens who are being deported.
Yes, it is true that six Americans detained in Venezuela have been released and are returning to the United States today. This development follows a meeting between Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, President Donald Trump's envoy for special missions. The discussions in Caracas focused on issues such as migration, sanctions, and the status of U.S. citizens detained in Venezuela. The Venezuelan government described the talks as respectful and emphasized the need for a "new beginning" in bilateral relations.
President Trump announced the release, expressing his pleasure at the return of the "six hostages" and commending Grenell for his efforts
The six Americans recently freed from Venezuela had been held for various lengths of time, with some detained for years. Details of the exact duration for each individual aren't all public, but most had been held for several months to several years before their release. The Americans were reportedly involved in cases linked to various legal issues in Venezuela, though the exact reasons for their detention have not been fully disclosed.
On their way home---
I find it a bit surprising that the topic was quickly diverted from without any attempt to address it. I, for one, detest vague slander just because a keyboard allows it. I realize this is the nature of some on social media, but in my view, it is nonproductive and just harbors discord. I do hope that some who visit will engage with my posts directly, rather than veering off-topic. It would be appreciated if the discussion could stay focused, rather than diverting and baiting.
The release of the American hostage in Venzuala, is a success. Trump's Dream Team, is a success, and is on the go.
President Donald Trump ordered the airstrikes against Islamic State operatives in Somalia. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed that the strikes were directed by President Trump and coordinated with the Somali government.
On February 1, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he had ordered military airstrikes targeting a senior Islamic State (ISIS) attack planner and other operatives in Somalia. The operation aimed at individuals hiding in caves in the Golis Mountains resulted in the destruction of the caves and the death of many terrorists, without harm to civilians.
REUTERS.COM
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed that initial assessments showed multiple operatives were killed and emphasized the goal was to degrade ISIS's capacity for planning and executing terrorist attacks against the U.S., its partners, and civilians.
REUTERS.COM
In his statement, President Trump emphasized the precision of the strikes and the commitment of the U.S. military to eliminate threats to the nation and its allies. He stated, "The strikes destroyed the caves they live in, and killed many terrorists without, in any way, harming civilians."
APNEWS.COM
This operation underscores the ongoing efforts of the U.S. military to combat terrorism and protect national and international security. Trump promised to stop the newfound growth of ISIS--- Looks like he is wasting no time. Promise keptReally, applauding military action in another country? I thought the idea was to focus on America and not about using our money and resources to kill a few people in caves halfway around the world?
“The message to ISIS and all others who would attack Americans is that ‘WE WILL FIND YOU, AND WE WILL KILL YOU!’” Trump said in a post.
Most of us are interested in lower grocery prices and inflation in this economy he has a suffering under (according to maga)... Not interested in finding terrorists around the world and killing them. People didn't vote for this and don't care about this. Why isn't the war in Ukraine over yet? Look here not there.. I killed some people in a cave...
I'm thinking this was essentially like shooting fish in a barrel ... To make any sort of dent in ISIS he would have to bomb out or shoot up thousands upon thousands of other caves. Is that the plan? I mean what's the point of taking out a couple of terrorists?
Meanwhile, he's got people terrified to fly after blaming the DC collision on DEI...people nervous that their pilots, crew and controllers may be DEI hires....A fine example of AI at work with military weaponry.
It is a good example. I appreciated the reputable sources it offered upon request.
Okay, I guess.
"I appreciated the reputable sources it offered upon request."
What is 'it'?" Okay, I guess " Expresses in my view a vague disagreement of some sort. Your response "What is it"? I can only assume you are questioning AI using Reuters. I have no problem with Reuters. The reporting regarding my topic is at multiple outlets. Any interest in the subject of my comment?
Okay . . . I'm not in disagreement with anything that I know of.
Seems you left off the words "I guess". "Okay, I guess" certainly conveys something other than Okay, context matters. Perhaps I did not understand the context you meant to share. My apology.
At any rate, if you choose to respond to my comments I prefer if you address the subject at hand. Just makes for a better more cohesive conversation.Sharlee . . . I'm getting lost. Call me dense I don't mind.
My comment post was . . .
Me: "A fine example of AI at work with military weaponry.
Sharlee: "It is a good example. I appreciated the reputable sources it offered upon request."
I interpreted "It is a good example" as being related to AI Weaponry. Was I wrong?
I did not understand, "I appreciated the reputable sources it offered upon request."
I interpreted to being related to the sentence before it. Was I wrong? I did not understand what 'it' was related to.
I ask your forgiveness for even posting anything at all, though the targeted caves of Somali were targeted using AI weaponry. In your original post about the mission your wrote, "In his statement, President Trump emphasized the precision of the strikes . . ." I was replying to that part of your original post.
Once again, I learned.My mistake—I initially thought you were referring to my comment, which I had pulled from AI. I had no idea AI weaponry was involved in the strike and don’t recall reading about it in the Reuters article. I should have asked for clarification. I sincerely apologize for the mix-up. I’m not well-versed in weaponry of any kind.
Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., demanded answers from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent today following a report that personnel affiliated with Elon Musk have sought access to a highly sensitive Treasury Department payment system. That system, which is maintained by non-political staff, disperses trillions of dollars each year, such as Social Security and Medicare benefits, tax credits for individuals and businesses, grants and payments to government contractors, including those that compete directly with Musk-owned companies...
What on earth is Musk up to?
Reporting just in...Elon Musk’s Team Now Has Full Access to Treasury’s Payments System...
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gave representatives of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency full access to the federal payment system.
The new authority follows a standoff this week with a top Treasury official who had resisted allowing Mr. Musk’s lieutenants into the department’s payment system, which sends out money on behalf of the entire federal government. The official, a career civil servant named David Lebryk, was put on leave and then suddenly retired on Friday after the dispute, according to people familiar with his exit.
The system could give the Trump administration another mechanism to attempt to unilaterally restrict disbursement of money approved for specific purposes by Congress, a push that has faced legal roadblocks.
They are subverting the legislature? There is no scenario in which this man should have access to this kind of information and power.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/01/us/p … ystem.html
https://katu.com/amp/news/local/wyden-d … ury-system
Related Discussions
- 104
Did Trump's picks prostrate themselves at Trump's Altar?
by Mike Russo 3 days ago
Trump didn’t recruit his nominees They recruited him.Every one of his nominees campaigned for these jobs by engaging in conspicuous displays of submission and flattery directed toward Trump.Elise Stefanik, whom Trump has nominated to be US ambassador to the United Nations, repeatedly boasted that...
- 645
To all that America was and stood for, I say goodbye
by Credence2 13 days ago
Excerpt from a commentary from Mike Lodgrum of Salon Magazine, most appropo in my opinion:No one can say that Trump ran a stealth campaign. He clearly told the American people his agenda. Now imagine if any politician told the electorate the following:I will lower your standard of living by putting...
- 555
Tracking Donald Trump's Promises Kept and Promises Broken
by Scott Belford 12 hours ago
Donald Trump, in order to get elected, promised a whole lot of things. This forum is to discuss whether he was able to our not. Here is a short list of Promises we can follow:Here are his Day One Promises (that would be Jan 21, 2025, I believe):Immigration and Border Security: Trump will...
- 45
Colonialism is back:Trunp and Panama: stupidity=ignorance squared
by Credence2 5 weeks ago
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-t … es-2024-12So this attitude is making America great again? Has it occurred to Trump that taking property from a sovereign nation constitutes an act of war? Trump speaks of exorbitant? He is the very epitome of the word. What sort of 19th century...
- 9
Trump's Picks Continue to be a Who's Who of Dumpster Fires
by Willowarbor 2 months ago
Trump picks former WWE executive Linda McMahon for education secretary...A former Senate candidate in Connecticut, McMahon is the former executive of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), which she co-founded with her husband, Vince McMahon.In October, McMahon was named in a new lawsuit involving...
- 129
Is President Trump Turning Out to an Existential Threat to America?
by Scott Belford 6 years ago
This is really two part question. The first part is the above question. The other is a slight twist, to wit: "Is President Trump Turning Out to an Existential Threat to Ideals Which America Represents?"The reason I ask is because consequences are becoming evident from his nine...