What do you think of Paul Ryan and his nomination for V.P. on the Republican ticket?
I don't like it. I wanted Romney to choose someone more moderate.
he is a social Darwinist, that really scares me, I think Habee and pretty Panther might be right, tactically it was the wrong move, Romney already has the far right with him because they want anyone but Obama, he should be appealing to moderates.
My thinking, exactly. One thing I like about Romney is that he governed pretty much as a moderate, which is why the TP never embraced him. I see this as a move to get the TPers on board. That's not going to help him win the election, IMO.
Romney could have appealed to indies, but I'm afraid a far-right VP will lose that group.
josak....I thought Ryan was a roman catholic....you know,the religion that holds all life to be sacred.
He is an Ayn Rand fan, the quintessential social Darwinist. You may have heard that the US catholic church has repeatedly distanced itself from him and several major figures in it have said that Ryan embodies to opposite of the message of Christ.
Ryan is described as a "devout Roman Catholic."
However, simply aligning on one issue (anti-abortion) does not make him or anyone a Catholic.
BTW, Biden's Catholic.
Haven't heard the Church denouncing him!
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/06/03/pro- … with-pope/
http://www.time.com/time/politics/artic … 65,00.html
http://blog.beliefnet.com/godometer/200 … biden.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2 … tion_N.htm
http://www.tldm.org/News12/ScrantonBish … oBiden.htm
Biden has a long standing and very difficult relationship with the entire Catholic church from conservative Catholics, to his local bishop, his home town bishop, the USCCB and the Pope. This is just a small list of articles, spanning many years, that have been written about Joe Biden and his difficulty with Catholic teaching.
Yes. And he's very articulate and convincing to people who don't know any better.
I don't know if it is a bad move on Romney's part. He can create a huge diversion and throw the whole debate back onto the economy where Obama is vulnerable. This gets the heat off the Bain Capital controversy and the withheld tax returns and his foreign relations debacle in Europe. Ryan is a savy politician that has sold his plan to many and makes a good argument defending it. He might have some legs with this move.
I would have prefered Marco rubio but Ryan was my number two choice. I think it helps Romney remove the last vesitiges of "moderate" from his campaign. Moderate Republicans lose - Gerald Ford, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, John McCain are proof. George W. Bush had to run as a conservative and required Dick Cheney to convince some hold outs.
McCain was a liberal-to-moderate Republican and well known as such. he didn't stand a chance until Palin energized his campaign, McCain's indecision during the banking crisis and his smooching Obama's behind turned conservatives away from the polls. Romney is more conservative than McCain and naming Ryan as VP cements his support among conservatives. That means more money and more realiable votes. There should be a bump in the polls before the convention and once Ryan speaks at the convention there will be even more confidence in him as a VP candidate.
Ryan is brilliant and a brilliant choice.
I think the Romney camp just sealed the victory for Obama.
Definitely. What are they thinking? It will certainly have an impact on the Independents, Ryan is much too conservative.
I don't know what they are thinking. I'm watching Fox News right now. They're spinning it as a bold choice that will provide a jolt of enthusiasm from the base. They're speculating Ryan will play the attack dog and go after Obama while Romney provides the "vision." Also, they believe it will swing the conversation back to the budget deficit since Ryan has been so visible in that debate.
PP, if that's their line of thinking, they're crazier than I thought. The conversation needs to be on the issues. Attacking each other does not win votes. I look forward to the Presidential debates.
I hope it does swing back to Ryan's extreme budget proposal. It will give Obama a clean sweep with those approaching retirement and they are a large segment of voters.
HA, their new slogan. Vulture/Voucher 2012!
I hope it does come down to the Ryan budget proposal, I look forward to comparing it to the Democrat budget proposal. Oh wait, they do not have one.
What are you on about? of course the Democrats have a budget proposal it didn't pass the Senate last year...
And a new one for this year: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2ch … _blog.html
totally false... then someone +++++++ something totally false... wonderful.
For both of you here is the Democrat budget summary for 2012-2013.
http://democrats.budget.house.gov/sites … mary_3.pdf
Try actually checking the facts in future... it's depressing when you don't.
It is depressing when someone does not understand how Washington works. Do you understand what a proposal is? Currently, there is no Democrat proposal before Congress. There was a proposal the recieve ZERO ZIP NANDA Votes, not ONE Democrat voted for it, 0-535, So the motion failed and therefore there is no proposal since it was defeated. The Ryan budget is sitting the the Senate because the Democrats are obstructing it to be brought to the floor for debate. All I have to say is if it the Ryan budget is so bad, why are the Democrats afraid to bring it to the floor and vote on it?
So as I said, I look forward to the budget discussion since the Dems do not have one.
Yes there was a budget that received no votes, then there was another one which was defeated in the Senate by about 15 votes, then there is one being introduced now, a budget plan does not need to pass the houses to be considered a budget otherwise obviously the Ryan plan is also not a budget plan.
Really, please cite the budget that the Dems put forward that almost passed and the mysterious one that is introduced now.
DO I really have to explain to you how a budget needs to pass both the house and the Senate? Hence why Ryan's passed the house and is sitting in the Senate and is waiting, or should we be honest, obstructed.
http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/vo … enate/1/37
that is the one defeated in the Senate, the one for 2012 - 13 is already linked above.
Yes and the democrat budget was obstructed too by the Republicans, neither side can pass a budget. But both have a budget plan and you compare them whenever you like.
I think it all boils down to who can struck a chord at the masses, budget structures discussions wont do it, showing genuine concern at the debates and speeches will do it! Masses - middle class and those at the lower income bracket!
Romney and Ryan are elites - that is how they are perceived!
Market segmentation - women, youth and middle to lower income classes will still vote for Obama!
And the elderly to near elderly - depends about what they can perceive they can get from the Ryan budget proposal.
I do not think it is a good choice.
Anyone else watching right now? The music, the unshaven look, no tie, hair a little askew, obligatory flag lapel pin. All of it calculated, or just some of it?
Well if you vote as if Uncle Sam owes you some then I gotta say that that's the end of the section.
I would prefer Ryan/Romney, overall good choice, perhaps we can bring the discussion back to policy instead of mudslinging.
Ryan's plan cuts 4 million jobs from the public sector, which is disastrous for Romney's campaign promise of 12 million new jobs. Furthermore, his plan increases spending 13% over five years. This combined with Romney's proposed unfunded tax cuts will double down on the deficit and make Obama look like Uncle Scrooge. Paul Ryan is not a true fiscal conservative.
Cutting public sector jobs will increase private sector employment because public sector employment merely transfers capital and labor from the productive, private economy and regions, job sectors and economic sectors where they are needed to the public sector which is separate from the natural forces of economic demand and measures success solely by political rewards. There is pent up capital, physical assets, labor and consumer demand waiting for Obama's exit. It is likely that Romney's election will produce more than 12 million jobs in the first 4 years.
"The conversation needs to be on the issues."
And that's where Ryan will take it.
So far, we have been treated to a series of attack ads by Obama, creating controversy that takes our attention off Obama's horrible record.
I think it's a great choice. He's young, has a beautiful family and seems to understand our problems. For sure he's one of the brightest persons in Washington.
Reading all this hysteria makes me curious as to who those who are freaking out think "should" have been chosen?
My Republican husband's reaction to Romney's VP pick: "That's Bull$h!t!"
That would be my reaction too, as it is I am pleased that it increases Obama's chances but displeased that if the Obama campaign screws up horribly we are one heart attack/car accident etc. away from having our worst president, certainly in modern history.
I'm not "freaking out." I'm just disappointed. I prefer the old GOP - not the TP version. I don't disagree with everything about the TP, but I'm more of a moderate. I'm afraid Ryan will alienate moderates.
You prefer the GOP that talks trash on the Senate floor against the opposing party and then wines and dines with the same guys at night?
That's called status quo and it is why we are where we are.
I absolutely prefer politicians who are not idiots, being able to sit down with and be friends with people from the other side is a mark of maturity, what do you call someone who won't have friends from the other side? You call them a fanatic, I have plenty of friends from the other side and anyone who is incapable of separating politics and person hood is probably unfit to lead anyone. Throughout the history of healthy democracies people on opposite sides in leadership disagreed strongly politically but did not make it personal, hell yes that is better.
Tea party members who won't associate with the opposition are immature and probably hateful and the fact you support that is pretty sad. (same goes for people on the other side)
It's about saying one thing and doing another entirely. It's about a game that has been played for far too long. It's about not actually caring about the people who are your employers but about maintaining your position so you can keep having surf and turf together.
It's about not caring what is in a bill as long as your party or good friend put it forth you will vote for it.
It's about thinking you are the boss and not the people. That's what the status quo is right now.
The use of that term"hateful" is most always out of context. It is a tactic.
You mean the losers GOP of Ford, Dole, McCain?
Mr. Romney's choice of Mr. Ryan is evidence that Republicans can and should be serious about converting our economy back to private-sector productivity and innovation instead of government dependency and bureaucracy. Mr. Romney is off to a good start with his first major appointment. May there be many more like Mr. Ryan
The United States Conference of Catholic Biships said Ryans plan would take away benefits from the poor. Described by the Bishops as contrary to church teachings. More evidence that Romney is out of touch with the middle class and the poor!
So Ryan wants what? Kill the elderly, they simply get starved into oblivion? Stop those 'evil' women from being healthy? Stop those 'evil' poor children from being healthy? Sort of a cruel task master to say the least. If people do not vote Against this team with everything they got, well they will Lose just that: Everything they got! They get rid of unions to put poor children back to work as slaved like the Industrial Revolution? Sad state America has placed itself in. Destroying the middle class is the answer?
"So Ryan wants what? Kill the elderly, they simply get starved into oblivion? Stop those 'evil' women from being healthy? Stop those 'evil' poor children from being healthy? Sort of a cruel task master to say the least. If people do not vote Against this team with everything they got, well they will Lose just that: Everything they got! They get rid of unions to put poor children back to work as slaved like the Industrial Revolution? Sad state America has placed itself in. Destroying the middle class is the answer?"
It really bothers me that anyone would even make such baseless accusations, much less actually believe that sort of thing and want others to believe it too.
Willstarr...finally I agree with you.People have been talking out of their rear end when it come sto Ryan when all the man is trying to do is balance the budget for the best long term prospects of the U.S.yes,there will be pain in the short term but America is so far in the jam it's not even joking about.....
Well what about this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbzpuqWo … r_embedded
Boy everyone sure worked hard ignoring THIS!!!!!!
It was quite easy because that was a two minute endorsement at a redneck university by a hack of a hack.
Former Clinton chief of staff is a hack now huh?
That was a hatchet job that came from his bruised and oversized ego, JS. Bowles was resentful that Obama decided to abandon the Bowles/Simpson Report and let Ryan (who was about to become the House Budget Chairman) submit his plan first.
You obviously can't see how petty Bowles was and still is.
Simpson-Bowles isn't that the holy grail? He was part of the great save the country from the credit down grade Commission appointed by Obama. It is the Weiden-Ryan Plan anyway - a good bi-partisan bill - holy again.
by Susie Lehto 2 years ago
"This is the closest that we have come to repealing Obamacare."I am over joyed at the moment! I confuse that I thought Speaker of the House Ryan was another Republican Rhino like John Boehner. The Repeal is going to the presidents desk. Obama will veto the bill most...
by alexandriaruthk 6 years ago
2012 US Presidential Election - Is Paul Ryan a good VP candidate choice for the Republican Party?Today, August 11, 2011, Mitt Romney Announced his running mate Paul Ryan. is this a good choice for the Republican Party? Do you think their chances of winning is better against Obama-Biden?
by Ralph Schwartz 2 years ago
Is Mitt Romney, Glen Beck, or Paul Ryan the biggest sore loser in the GOP primary?Beck says God is punishing us. Romney is still sour on being rejected by the voters not only once but twice. Paul Ryan has dreams of being the white knight and now he's on the outside looking in and most...
by Mike Russo 6 years ago
Here is an excellent Website that will tell you 12 things that you wanted to know about Paul Ryan, but were afaraid to ask. Please comment on how you feel about Paul Ryan.http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/ … paul-ryan/
by Xenonlit 6 years ago
Paul Ryan contributed to the current deficit with these votes, yet stands there with a straight face and says Obama is "wrecking" the country. Remember these facts: Invade Iraq HR 114 Voted Yea $1.3 trillion and counting First...
by Dr Billy Kidd 6 years ago
From several exchanges, I learned why some people are voting for Romney. It is because Romney will launch a war against Iran. Generally, it is said that Muslims will attack the U.S. again. And that Iran will use nukes, maybe suitcase bombs. Muslim, socialist Obama won't stop it from happening.Now,...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|