|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Is the Constitution fine the way it is or do we need new amendments to it?
Term limits for Congress comes to mind when I read your question.
Our constitution will always require very careful updating as time and change make their mark on our country.
Our big constitution problem since I've been around is clarity.
Just one example of what I mean if our right to bear arms. Our founding fathers new nothing of assault rifles and other killing machines generally available these days.
The legislation, the time, and the money wasted arguing these points to no avail is staggering and can only be eliminated by re-clarifing our constitutional amendments. This is a critical issue that must be made clear as many innocent people die every day as a direct result of our contemptuous apathy
Agree with Frog Prince and Credemce2, for the most part it just needs to be followed. I'm not a big gun guy, but the type of guns made today would have had no bearing on the 2nd amendments intention.
The US Constitution has been watered down by the SCOTUS over the last one hundred years. They have found in favor of using the Interstate Commerce Clause to expand the size and scope of the federal government.
When doing this the federal government takes away rights and powers left to the states under the 10th Amendment.
The 16th amendment was also passed by them as constitutional even though it circumvented apportionment for income taxes. The power to tax was already in the constitution but this amendment took away the apportionment between the states.
The 14th amendment didn't give Black men the right to vote, nor did it give Women the right to vote. These were given by the 15th, and 19th amendment. The latter was 55 years after the 15th.
The constitution is silent about the validity of the simple majority vote of the SCOTUS. The constitution was also silent on the details of creating the SCOTUS, because the founders left it up to Congress to setup.
Same sex marriages should have required an amendment, as the SCOTUS didn't give any real reason why it should be forced upon the states. These were states rights that were trampled by the SCOTUS.
As I mentioned, the 14th amendment didn't even operate with clarity, and equality for the right to vote, which is an inherent right in a democratic republic.
The structure of the three branches of government needs to be changed as it has clearly failed us this century. We need these amendments to catch up with technology, and all the changes it has created for elections, campaigning, etc.
The continuing gridlock of congress, and the de facto legislative actions by the president need to be addressed by amendment.
The political system has failed due to the divergent goals of the two political parties, and I doubt the founders anticipated this when they created the constitution. Having the 3 branches of govt seemed like a good check and balance, but it didn't really work this century.
I could go on but I am running out of characters for comments here.
Short answer, the Constitution is leaking, and it needs amendments to stop those leaks.
by tbHistorian4 years ago
The Georgia state legislature passed a measure calling for a Convention of States to amend the U.S. Constitution. This would establish a Continental Congress composed of citizens that would work to achieve...
by Charles James7 years ago
As some fellow hubbers will know, I am involved in writing hubs for a Socialism 101 series.There are a few issues raised by the conservatives where I do not fully understand what they are saying. Before I address these...
by ptosis6 years ago
It has been said that "Immigration is a federal issue and we can't have 50 states making 50 laws." but we have 50 different rules for voting for the president which is also a federal issue.I'm not asking if...
by Doug Hughes6 years ago
The 14th AmendmentSection 4. "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or...
by Ralph Schwartz18 months ago
Should Government employees be disallowed from using the Fifth Amendment?Recently Attorney General Loretta Lynch took the 5th p, declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama...
by Poppa Blues8 years ago
Don't take my word for it listen to an expert!The Truth About the Health Care BillsPosted August 12, 2009Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.