jump to last post 1-10 of 10 discussions (18 posts)

Rasmussen Poll Trump Leads Clinton by 2 Points Nationally - Is the Media Losing

  1. The Old Guard profile image73
    The Old Guardposted 18 months ago

    Rasmussen Poll Trump Leads Clinton by 2 Points Nationally - Is the Media Losing the Propaganda Wars?

    I'm feeling the news media, despite all the propaganda they're spewing about hilllary killary, is losing the war!
    The war being against democracy and for a socialistic cesspool. The average person sees through the lies by the media. Americans want a return to values of right and wrong. Scum like hillary killary and her pay to play schemes, her millions gotten from bribes, sucking of taxpayers her entire life.
    And it is a war - truth vs. propaganda. It is time to drain the swamp of scum we currently have in D.C.. Let's get rid of socialists like hillary killary!  Comment if you agree!


  2. greenmind profile image95
    greenmindposted 18 months ago

    Yes Trump is on the way to a major victory -- all the polls agree -- check out RealClearPolitics electoral map!

    1. lisavollrath profile image97
      lisavollrathposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      For those of you who don't get the joke: RCP has been showing Clinton over the top in electoral votes for over a week now.

  3. lovemychris profile image61
    lovemychrisposted 18 months ago

    but i thought the election was rigged. is it legit now? or only of he wins? can you SEE yourselves?

    1. lovemychris profile image61
      lovemychrisposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      "fascism did not rise in the 30's because it was so strong, but because democracy was so weak"--steve schmidt. so, who has been undermining our democracy? birthers, gvt haters, election deniers.....it is upon us.

  4. lions44 profile image99
    lions44posted 18 months ago

    Stick to the RealClear averages and Inv. Biz Daily. Sabato has a great site too.

    Stay away from Rasmussen. Worst pollster in America.

    1. promisem profile image98
      promisemposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      Great points. I follow Sabato and RealClear as well because they are objective, non-partisan and look at averages rather than individual polls.

  5. lisavollrath profile image97
    lisavollrathposted 18 months ago

    So, one poll showing Trump ahead by less than the margin of error is accurate, while all the polls showing Clinton ahead aren't? How does that work?

    (Also, the Rasmussen numbers posted this morning on Real Clear Politics show Clinton +1, not Trump. Still within the margin of error.)

  6. tamarawilhite profile image91
    tamarawilhiteposted 18 months ago

    Wikileaks revelations prove her team paid off the second in command at the FBI the day they said "clean it up".

    The same day that Cheryl Mills told Podesta they needed to 'clean up' the email scandal, Hillary Surrogate Terry McCauliffe met with the FBI agent who oversaw the Clinton email case and his wife and promised financial support ($500,000+) if she ran for office.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/com … ryl_mills/

    The TV stations giving Trump 90%+ negative coverage and not addressing Clinton's illegal actions are proof they are biased. What is worse is the social media bias that is now proven but also under-reported.

    Allum Bohkari: Leftists Rig Social Media!

    WikiLeaks Makes DNC Look Bad - Banned on Facebook and Shadowbanned on Twitter
    http://investmentwatchblog.com/twitter- … ebook-now/

    I hate having to go to British sites for less biased reporting on American politics.

    Apple, Twitter, Google, Instagram collude to defeat Trump
    http://observer.com/2016/08/tech-compan … eat-trump/

    1. promisem profile image98
      promisemposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      Just out of curiosity, what does this have to do with the Rasmussen poll question?

    2. lovemychris profile image61
      lovemychrisposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      propaganda war

  7. promisem profile image98
    promisemposted 18 months ago

    Rasmussen is known for producing results very favorable to Republicans. It is quoted on Fox News all of the time and hired by Republican candidates quite often.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the … mmon-poll/

    It badly over estimated the support for the last two Republican presidential candidates. Rather than winning, both lost.

    http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co … race/?_r=0

    It is so controversial and inaccurate that its founder just quit.

  8. Aime F profile image86
    Aime Fposted 18 months ago

    I'm just curious -

    All of the people touting their polls/info that show Trump winning as 'real', are you going to admit that you were drawing from flawed sources if he loses?  Or are you just gathering (flawed) sources ahead of time so you have something to refer to when you complain that the election was rigged if Hillary wins?

    1. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image61
      Dont Taze Me Broposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      Flawed sources? The polls that have Trump ahead or close are the ones that have historically been accurate for the last 3 elections. The flawed polls are the media polls, if you knew anything about polls you'd know that.

    2. Aime F profile image86
      Aime Fposted 18 months agoin reply to this

      So... that's a no.

  9. IslandBites profile image88
    IslandBitesposted 18 months ago


    Wednesday, October 26, 2016

    Hillary Clinton still maintains a slight advantage as support for the major third party candidates appears to be slipping away in Rasmussen Reports’ latest White House Watch survey.

    The new national telephone and online survey shows Clinton leading Republican Donald Trump 44% to 43% among Likely U.S. Voters. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson earns a new low of four percent (4%) support, and Green Party nominee Jill Stein has fallen to one percent (1%). Three percent (3%) still like some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

    Clinton edged ahead yesterday 43% to 42%.

  10. Julie Nou profile image58
    Julie Nouposted 17 months ago

    With the latest bomb shell in the HRC campaign, that is reopening of FBI investigation this lead will only increase.  DNC and main media used very creative sampling techniques: sampling 13% more of registered Democrats, around 7% more of Independents, than Republicans.  Similar techniques were used in Britain before Brexit.  You know how that ended up.

    This late into campaign, the best poll is the look at the size of crowds both candidates attract.  Main street media constantly fudging the footage about these facts.  The win by Trump will be resounding blow to the media party of this election.  That is why they counting on voting fraud to get HRC elected

    1. lovemychris profile image61
      lovemychrisposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      do you know what breitbart is? its a media outlet. they are running trumps campaign. did they tell you democrats are using voter fraud? cause that story of votes changing from trump to hillary was a lie. and in his epic win, should dems cry fraud?