Newt Gingrich said Assange should be treated as an enemy combatant.
Max Frankel said "The threat of massive leaks will exist so long as there are massive secrets."
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates: Is it embarrassing? Yes. Is it awkward? Yes. Consequences for US foreign policy" I think fairly modest."
Sec. State Hillary Clinton: "It puts people's lives in danger, threatens our national security and undermines our efforts to work with other countries to solve shared problems...Disclosures like these tear at the fabric of the proper function of responsible government."
Security expert Bruce Schneier: "Secrets are only as secure as the least trusted person who knows them..."
It's interesting to see a staunch Republican taking a more reasoned and considered stance than Clinton.
Hillary Clinton seems a lot more aggressive than Bill Clinton, may I say... more like... well, Bush.
I honestly think that statement by Hillary Clinton has a lot to do with her wanting to retire. I think she abandoned the principles of the Democratic Party, for a one world financial system. Her corruption is complete, and now she knows we know it.
If the government didn't do underhanded things then it would have no reason to keep secrets from the public.
I'm not sure what Julian Assange is?
He's a passionate journalist who didn't want to sell himself down the river to liars such as Murdoch and instead pursued a mission to get the truth heard.
Journalists worldwide are killed for telling the truth, and that is what America wants to do to Assange, kill him.... or drive him insane like Bradley Manning. The same happens in Ireland, you out an IRA member of a drug dealer and you get hunted down and killed.
We don't live in a free world, none of us, nowhere. Assange hasn't broken any laws, he has passed on information that was passed on to him.
Bradley Manning has broken a law, but not one which should see him treated inhumanely, tortured in fact, no human being should be tortured. Yet, the Americans are quick to point out human rights crimes in China? Pah. I would sooner get a quick bullet to my head than to have to sleep naked in 23 hours a day of isolation in a tiny cell which is barely big enough to take two steps in.
Hey Ryan, I know what's what. You didn't need to go through the spill of your post.
With the amount of distortion, distraction tactics and misinformation done by politicians, I only stated that I didn't know "WHAT" Julian Assange is. I didn't say I didn't know "WHO" he is.
Yeah I answered your question:
Question: I'm not sure what Julian Assange is?
Answer: He's a passionate journalist
Ryan, that only tells me what he did for a living. Which is common knowledge. It is part of "who" he is.
His book is out in April, buy it and find out
Britain of all the western countries have bought the least war criminals to trial ,yet they get upset with Julian.
Yea he was irresponsible,and so?.
Time should match the crime is my opinion.
Britain are upset with Julian Assange?
He is living a lap of luxury about 30 minutes away from my house, I saw him the other day.
Chauffuer, mansion, swimming pool, parties, champagne. It's Americans that want his blood.
Hey well thats going the other extreme,maybe ...nah good for him.
Look its no accident we never see any Poltician or Lawyer in prison ( for any significant time).
Ryan there was a doco here recently ..and Julian was under house arrest or something and not allowed to leave the area he was in.
I didnt like it.
If youre a notable Politician in the US,you can lie to your constituients ,cheat on your wife ,and never be fired.
Now theres a job with great benefits
Britain arrested Julian Assange because Interpol accepted a Swedish request for an international arrest warrant to be issued.
If Interpol want somebody arrested you have to do it. He then got remanded in custody for a few days, before a judge let him out on bail.
Basically he is fighting extradition to Sweden, who want him on rape charges. A British court will decide whether to extradite him to Sweden or let him be.
If the British refuse to extradite him then he has a choice, which is a) stay in Britain forever, or b) go somewhere else and risk being arrested again. Unless Interpol recinder the warrant.
Whilst a criminal trial is being undertaken in the UK you are not allowed to leave the country, yet gave an Australian address at his trial, which is why he is has been put under "house arrest". He has to sign on at a police station once a day.
But the house happens to be a huge 10 bedroom country mansion, owned by a rich descendant of the aristocracy, with a cool 600 acres of land which he walks around shooting pheasants:
He can leave the house between 2am - 10am and then 2pm - 10pm.
So basically, he gets 16 hours a day to go wherever the bleedin hell he wants! And he is allowed to run Wikileaks from the house!
If anybody wants to put me under "house arrest" in a 600 acre country estate, from which I can still run my websites, then feel free! Yes please!
Julian Assange KNEW that there was an arrest warrant out for him, and that is why he booked a flight to the UK, where he knew that he would get a fair trial. The same can not be said of America, where (in contrast), Bill Manning is spending 23 hours per day in isolation with the lights being left on all day, completely naked.
Landing in Britain was the safest thing for Assange to do Unfortunately it looks like he WILL be extradited, and then he will probably be sent to America, where he will be tortured in isolation like Bradley Manning.
Unless the US can prove he paid or otherwise got Manning to give the documents, he is a journalist and has first amendment rights.
Some of your prominent figures called for charges of "treason"!!!
That really is evidence that America thinks that it IS the world, treason can only be brought against US citizens, which Assange is not.
Others called for his hanging. Eric Holder seems to think that he can charge him for something, Pete King wants him branded a terrorist.
Of course, he doesn't have to be charged with anything to be tortured by Americans, just like Guantanamo Bay detainees. And if he is charged with something he could spend a long time in a 23 hour per day isolation cell.
Bradley Manning hasn't been found guilty of anything yet. America can, and would, torture him. And I think that is sad. Very sad.
Good explanation -Thanks
Sweden ,well dont know anything about their judicial system ,but its gotta be more objective -right?
The alleged crime was committed in Sweden, it has nothing to do with the British police. The only reason that we are involved is because Sweden got an International arrest warrant, and because we are obliged to comply with that we arrested him as he touched down in the UK.
The reason that he is still in the UK is because his lawyers are fighting his extradition to Sweden. A British judge has decided that he should return to Sweden to face the allegations, Assange is appealing against the decision, if he loses his appeal he will be sent on a plane to Sweden.
A little like if you shoplift in Canada, you aren't going to court in America. Only, the allegations are rape, which is more serious. I have no idea what the legal system is like in Sweden, but the Swedish don't seem to like him very much.
Ok ,well he should answer to the rape charges.
And the Wiki leaks are a separate charge right?.
All this Government crap is dodgy to say the least.
I keep thinking about when those two French spies blew up the Rainbow Warrior peacekeeping activist boat Greenpeace,while it was docked in port(NZ). Activists had been protesting France and her nuclear testing in the Pacific. Anyway the French didnt relise someone was sleeping on board ,and the short and long of it deals were done....
Those two French Spies never did jail time in New Zealand, and were extratited to an island somewhere off the coast of France to do time-yea right.
Looked similar to Julians crib
He isn't charged with any WikiLeaks stuff.
The Americans want to screw him, but many of us believe that he has done no wrong, which he hasn't.
The reason that he doesn't want to return to Sweden for the charges is because he believes that they will then send him to the US, for them to torture him like they are Bradley Manning.
As Kay said in Men In Black:
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
Some people are able to handle the truth. Most people aren't - and most prefer their ignorance.
The Army's treatment of the young soldier who leaked the cables has been shameful, bordering on torture.
They would do the same to Assange if they could get hold of him, which they probably will now that it looks like he is heading to Sweden.
He has an ace up his sleeve.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2 … ear-option
What's amazing to me is that so many of the teabaggers who want to execute Assuage for spilling US secrets think they should be present at every meeting President Obama conducts.
I hope that this non-sense shows everyone the idiocy of "enemy combatants".
Even Obama was demanding we treat "Enemy Combatants" differently than "humans". And now the definition changes with the political winds.
This is how gulags are made.
by Zubair Ahmed 7 years ago
Why does the US want to silence Julian Assange?Julian Assange is the founder and spokesperson for the now infamous website Wikilieaks. This man and his website has become synonymous with government blunders. Being under house arrest for more than 500 days and still no conviction...SOMETHING...
by Singular Investor 8 years ago
I thought it would be a neat idea to award Julian Assange the Nobel Peace Prize for 2011 - if he's still alive of course - but it seems I was not the only one to have the same thought - the Russian government has suggested it already - 2 Peace Prize Winners imprisoned - 1 in the USA (he ain't there...
by andycool 8 years ago
WikiLeaks is involved in uncovering many hateful activities of the US government. In this respect would it be justified to restrict their activities by the US government?
by alexandriaruthk 7 years ago
Should Julian Assange be extradited to the US?Now that Julian Assange application for asylum was granted by Ecuador government, what should be done about his case in Sweden. Is it possible he can be extradited in the US?
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter 2 years ago
NYT article: posted by Donald Trump Jr. on Twitter on July 11, 2017To everyone, in order to be totally transparent, I am releasing the entire email chain of my emails with Rob Goldstone about the meeting on June 9, 2016. The first email on June 3, 2016 was from Rob, who was relating a request from...
by pisean282311 8 years ago
WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange said in an interview published Thursday there was a "high chance" he would be killed in a US jail if he were to be extradited from Britain on espionage charges.The Australian is on bail in Britain fighting a bid by Sweden to extradite him over sex assault...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|