Many women find me sexually attractive and exciting. I have no explanation for this as I consider myself just an ordinary guy. But I am a master of the art of seduction and satisfaction. I understand what women want, and so I am ready to answer your questions , and provide valuable insight that will bring you much happiness in the years to come.
Women do not want illusions. They want power. If they want (what) you (have to offer) they give up their power momentarily, but today (as ever) they will always try to get it back again. So beware.
Unless that is fine too …
or even better.
Ok. My meds (olanzapine) have caused my sex drive to reach zero. To top that off, it also causes sexual interactions to be very unpleasant as well due to oversensitivity. I would like to feel normal again, especially for the sake of my partner (I have been avoiding sex for months). I do not want to stop taking olanzapine because it controls my hallucinations/delusions with out any other unwanted side effects. it's the only antipsychotic that doesn't have side effects for me. I haven't tried them all yet, but I really don't want to try anything new and risk side effects.
What should I do?
Disclaimer: I am not a trained physician, nor do I have experience in the field of medicine. However, in many ways I am something better. I am a very sexy man , and I am very intelligent. I am also very kind to those with good hearts, and I am hateful toward those who have been corrupted by arrogance, greed, and materialism. And I would never let anyone suffer, simply because they cannot afford the price of admission. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need". This is the way of the superior intellect. And this is the way of the civilized, and sexy man.
First of all, I would seek the advice of a trained, and qualified nutritionist. Take your time and shop around. There are many pretenders who are simply looking for a payday. If you are someone who eats meat, I recommend that you explore the possibilities of a vegetarian diet. If you are having pain during sexual intercourse, it is not good to continue such activity until you solve the problem. But this is only a stumbling block, and it is not the end of your sexy life. I often use adversity as a catalyst for new ideas, and different approaches to a particular problem. If intercourse is currently a problem, then instead of giving up altogether, I would focus on oral sex, and other means of clitoral stimulation. I am assuming you are a woman, but if you are a man, I am not aware of how you could achieve orgasm while experiencing pain with Mr. Johnson.
And now, I will share my sexy life with you:
I was married at one time for a very short while, and it was a very bad thing for me to do. A sexy man should know better. Although this was not my intent, my sexy ways destroyed our marriage. I caused my wife to suffer a great emotional pain. When you wake up in the morning to the muffled sound of a woman weeping in the basement; a woman who did nothing but show you the kindness of her heart, it is a sound that you will never forget. And it is a great shame that will follow you like a shadow.
During my marriage I began to suffer from panic attacks, and they were becoming increasingly severe. While having an attack, my heart would start to beating very fast, and it would become difficult to breath. I was in fear for my life. And so, I went to see a doctor. I sat in the waiting room for approx. 45 minutes. After the doctor finally called my number, I was in her office for less than ten minutes. I explained the problem. She asked if I was having any difficulties in life that might trigger the attacks. I explained that I was a very sexy man, and of course, as I was sitting right there in front of her, I am sure that she already knew. She prescribed Paxil, which is an antidepressant. She also prescribed a faster acting tranquilizer, but I cannot remember the name.
Several weeks later, my wife and I were discussing my problem. During our conversation, she related that she had recently heard on a news program about the negative effects of caffeine, and how it can trigger panic attacks in some people. We began to talk about my diet. And here is what we discovered: I was binging on chocolate! Almost daily I would go to the IGA and buy those big Hershey Bars, and other kinds of chocolate as well. I was drinking coffee all day long in the recording studio. I was also drinking almost a 12 pack of Coca Cola, or Pepsi everyday! On top of that I was chain smoking cigarettes. All totaled, that is an excessive amount of sugar, caffeine, and nicotine. We agreed that I was poisoning myself.
Although I have since quit smoking, I was not able to do so at that time. However, I immediately removed all caffeine from my diet. During the 2 weeks after my visit to the doctor, I had never taken the Paxil because I was afraid of it. But I did take the faster acting tranquilizer, and it did seem to ease the attacks and provide some relief. However, about a week after removing the caffeine from my diet, I no longer had a need for the tranquilizer, as I was no longer having the panic attacks. That was over 15 years ago, and I have not had a panic attack since then.
It is then that I became very angry. Had I blindly followed the crooked path, I would have continued taking the drugs, as I continued to poison myself with sugar and caffeine. And the doctor, and the drug companies, would have continued sucking my blood and taking my money, as my condition would have only continued getting worse. Being a doctor, the first thing she should have inquired about was my diet. But many doctors are no better than the drug pushers who sell illicit drugs on the street. They are all drug pushers, and we must never forget this rule of thumb: for many Americans, the face of God is printed on a dollar bill.
A nutritionist may be able to offer suggestions about certain foods you can add or remove from your diet. And if you are eating a lot of junk food, I would immediately cease all activity in that area. Please, do not let greedy people ruin your life. There are many examples of how food can adversely affect our health. If we can find a way to health without the use of drugs, that is always the better way. And do not be deceived by ignorant people. When you refer to the fact that you are having hallucinations, which is why you need the drug, I am interested to know what you are seeing or hearing. Although it is true that people are susceptible to delusions, due to disease, or a physical malfunction of the brain, it is also true that there are people who have psychic abilities. I am such a person, and you must understand that ignorant and fearful people, many who have college degrees, will dismiss anything that they do not understand, or that has not been sanctioned by a ruling authority.
If you shared with me the specifics of these apparent delusions, I may be able to direct you toward information that may be of use. In summary, continue to follow your doctors advice, while exploring alternatives such as I have mentioned. Be smart ... and be sexy.
Even though I agree on much you say. I must point out some downsides I've heard repeated. One is your hatefulness toward a way of thinking.
My wife tried to convince every single person I know that I hated her. I have never hated anyone in my life because hatred turns into revengefulness, then you better dig two graves. One for them and one for you. I just get rid of negative people by ignoring them.
To say your very intelligent means your more likely not. What do any of us know about the 99% unknown world. You know alot yet overall no better or worst than any one else.
Upsides - I do sense you do have something important to contribute to the world. From being a world class athlete and artist, don't let it blow up your head.
I doubt he harbors animosity toward anyone. Nothing he says could be said with sincerity. He is actually a very funny guy.
From hiring thousands of artists in my day, he has the desire and the abilities.
My concern is going over the top with hate. The people will win in the end anyways.
I believe love is stronger than hate. I think hate is usually a desire for love, unfulfilled.
As to him being an artist? I will say he does excel at creative writing.
A Brief Introduction:
Today as I was composing this piece, I walked out of my fromt door, half naked in the shining sun. I immediately knew I was secretly being watched and admired by a lonely female. I have seen her watching me from her window before. But I cannot fulfill her fantasies. This is where I live, and I would only break her heart.
Love and Hate: A Sexy Perspective
Many do not understand the meaning of love and hate. Neither love nor hate can be seen as strictly a negative or a positive, as the door swings both ways. As an example: If you are a woman with children, and you have a clear way out, there is no virtue in staying with the man who beats you everytime his girlfriend goes on vacation with her husband. One day he may accidentally kill you; leaving your children to grow up as orphans, with many bad memories to spare. This is a negative kind of Love, because it rarely ends well.
On the other hand: Hate can be a positive force in the world, and it appears that many have been deceived by evil men and their false teachings. For instance: If we did not hate the pain in the human body, then we would not see about the pain. Our limbs would rot and we would surely fall apart. Everyone hates pain, and through hate ... we are delivered. And it comes in that order: pain + hate= deliverance from evil; whether it be the evil of disease and infection in the human body, or the evil of an invading or occupying army, or force.
However, we cannot say pain + love= deliverance. This would be a false teaching. Because if we love the pain, it will never go away! If we love our enemy, we will never fight back. We can now see that "Love and Hate" both serve a dual purpose. We should not be concerned about the existence of either, but only the application.
And as far as your comment : "To say your very intelligent means your more likely not."
What effect do you hope to achieve here? Look around you. Are you living in a forgotten paradise insulated from the rest of the world? If we are living in the same world, and you are truly a sexy man, surely you can see that the whole thing is falling part. Considering the current state of the world, if Don Quixote is out fighting windmills, why would you even care? Of course he has gone mad! But who is he hurting in his make believe world? He has already lost his mind? Must we also destroy his illusions? And what do we gain by rendering him naked, with nothing real or imagined, but simply nothing at all?
Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. My aim is suffer less and be happy more.
A Christain girlfriend took me to church to hear a speech on love your enemies for God is a jealous God. Jealousy is the shadow of death and greed. I have no business with greed, anger, hate and jealousy. I have no attachment nor do I think it exist in my DNA.
Love has degrees and different kinds of love. I can even deatttach myself from other negative feeling in order to give love more freely.
I dreamed 5 years ago about the violent collaspe of America. I did attached my love for my daughter too much to the point I did not escaped to Bolivia. My Daughter cried and said she is heart broken I am leaving for Bolivia to live now. I must love myself first in order to survive for in my dream I will die if I stay.
I'm determined to convince her to come to Bolivia once I'm set up and hope it is not too late.
Can't imagine running out of ideas to kill anyone in my life time, another reason to go, for this love of money will kill too many.
North America is 6% of the World's Population and carries 45% of the World's wealth. That is about to change rapidity.
Hello? Hate is a positive force? And you claim to be intelligent? Hate is a choice that eats away at the spirit of the person who engages in it.
I'm sad to say a truly sexy man would already be aware of this. Put your shirt on, go back into your house and ponder this.
To be fair, he said hate can be a positive force. And I'm inclined to agree. There are times we ought to hate. The events in Nice certainly make my blood boil.
I disagree. Hate caused those events. Hate in response does what?
Hate can be a motivator for change. For instance, I hated being a messy person and made strides to eliminate that behaviour. But perhaps the more apt word is anger:
Modern psychologists view anger as a primary, natural, and mature emotion experienced by virtually all humans at times, and as something that has functional value for survival. Anger is seen as a supportive mechanism to show a person that something is wrong and requires changing. Anger can mobilize psychological resources for corrective action.
What emotional response do you recommend regarding these events, if not anger and hate?
Anger, to me, implies a short lived emotion. Hatred, long lived. Perhaps for a life time. I can see where anger can be positive but not hate.
That semantic distinction is probably true. But when does something turn from "anger" into "hatred"?
It took us the better part of a decade to defeat Hitler. Is that enough time to turn anger into hate, or were we just angry at him and the Nazis? To this day the world generally views Hitler and Nazis with intense dislike. Are we still angry at him, or is it hatred? Is there no benefit to hating Hitler and Nazis?
I would say that the negative effect of hatred on the individual spirit outweighs any positive that might be obtained.
Momentary anger, followed by action to change circumstances which caused the anger makes sense. I suppose hate might have been a useful thing to a soldier on the ground. It's easier to point a machine gun at someone you hate than someone you are angry with. Hatred blocks all possibility of discussion, any hope of compassion and frees the individual to justify all manner of atrocities.
But, hatred couldn't have helped to rebuild Germany or Japan. Hatred wouldn't allow us to hope for better relations with many countries in the Middle East. Hatred has a sense of hopeless finality to it which breeds more hatred.
When I say I hate the guy who ran over and shot hundreds of people yesterday, I'm under the impression that any possibility of discussion was forfeit by none other than that individual. For obvious reasons.
I never said I hate him in isolation, though. I feel compassion, in the sense of pity and sorrow, that he was so troubled and brainwashed into committing those atrocities. Many members of ISIS are themselves brainwashed. We can empathize with their condition and hate their actions and beliefs at the same time.
You asked what hate does in response to such an event. What does compassion do? What good will it do empathizing with these perpetrators' conditions, at this moment in time?
We helped rebuild Germany because we had compassion for Germans. We didn't hate Germans. We hated Nazis. I never said hatred could do everything. But before we could rebuild Germany, we had to defeat their authoritarian regime. Discussion would not have done that. Compassion would not have done that.
You're right that hatred can free the individual to justify any and all atrocities. But so can empathy. It's very easy to be altruistic to the point of pathology. This is why I'm not advocating for uncontrolled hatred or empathy.
We are mostly in agreement. I'm what is best classified as an empathetic b#tch. Tough love. I think everyone bears some responsibility within events. Although we are all ultimately responsible for our own actions. If that makes sense.
So you can do wrong, even heinous wrong. And, although I may have failed you at some point and, in my failure, contributed to the chain of events which led to your action you must pay the price for it. Because we can't blame others for choices we make. But, if we fairly look at it we may be able to avert future tragedy by changing our own behavior patterns also.
Incidentally, you might be right that hate caused those events. But not all forms of hatred are equal. Was that hate justified in targeting innocent civilians? Was it controlled and measured?
I don't know. I don't know all the details. Honestly, I can't help but wonder where, as a global society, we have missed the opportunities to make a positive difference in the lives of these people bent on carnage and destruction. Because I do believe we all begin our lives with the same potential for good and evil. Why some turn so violent is very sad and troubling. I don't think it has to be so but even here we have those who have every opportunity but they turn to hatred which spawns violence. I have no idea what within a free society could case us to be hated so much. But if I turn to hatred in response, they win.
Did the Nazis think they won because most of the world hated them?
That was a totally different scenario. What was the end goal of the Nazis? What is the end goal of radical Islam? I don't think it is the same.
Worldwide Sharia, with prescribed punishments like beheadings, flogging and stoning for gays, women and apostates? I'd say it's at least just as bad.
Some claim to want that, yes. I've also read some are pushing hoping to trigger an end time scenario, also. But, I don't think many of these suicide scenarios involve individuals hoping for what you, or I, are suggesting. And until we understand what is compelling them to such violence it won't stop.
We can understand what's compelling them but it still won't stop. People want power over others even for a brief moment before they blow themselves up. It's an intoxication and a high which they think is spiritual. Combine this with high tech and pills and you get a power crazed loony who thinks he's on a spiritual high. Humanity is letting itself down.
Combine all of this with a full frontal culture clash and buckets of "culture shock" and we get an endless supply of loons. The left goes way out so the right goes further. It's all a predictable mess.
Those individuals are killing themselves (and as many as they can take) for martyrdom. They believe they'll be rewarded after death because they fought the infidels.
You might be right that some of these individuals aren't specifically hoping to bring about Sharia with their actions, but like a Kamikaze pilot many are seriously dedicated to their cause. It still ties back to establishment of Islamic rule, if not by the individuals who engage in these suicide scenarios, then by their leadership.
Either way, "being hated" is not a victory condition for them, just like it wasn't a victory condition for Nazis.
I disagree about the victory condition. If the individual is martyring himself in hopes that their actions will move us closer to an apocalyptic showdown then they do hope to make us hate them. Only through making us (the West) unreasonably hate Islam they could create a scenario where all of Islam might stand on their side.
Now, does the individual engaged in the act of violence reason it out this way? Probably not. But the powers that be which push them toward this may. Whatever circumstances have pushed them to the edge, where they are willing to die, are probably wildly different. They are suicidal, not necessarily driven by religion. Religion is just a convenient excuse to move forward with these actions.
I don't see how it's unreasonable to hate an ideology that advocates for beheadings, flogging and stoning for gays, women and apostates, I really don't.
Even if I accept your unrealistic premise that these individuals are making the West unreasonably hate Islam (yet manage to not make non-fundamentalist Muslims hate them, somehow) and that they can succeed in unifying all Muslims against the West, that would not be a victory condition for them. We've been at war against an enemy who we haven't even properly identified because we're too busy worrying about offense. What will happen if they remove such concerns by making it clear that all of them are the enemy?
They are not suicidal in conventional terms. Someone who is suicidal does not typically use religion as a "convenient excuse" (an excuse for what, exactly?). Someone who is suicidal does not typically try to engage in Kamikazes. Someone who is suicidal does not typically try to kill as many people as possible while shouting Allahu Ahkbar. Let's not disparage the suicidal by lumping them in with these lunatics as if it is the norm for suicidal people.
It was not my understand that you had.been advocating the idea of hating an ideology, but the person who adhered to it. So if that was your argument from the beginning you have no argument with me, other than to reiterate that the negatives.associated with hatred outweigh the positives. And there are more productive ways to be 'anti' something than to engage in hate.
And, in case you weren't aware of this, being suicidal is a mental disorder. So you using the term lunatic for one and not the other is odd, to say the least. Any type of suicide does harm to others, is inconsiderate of one's fellow man and is self centered and selfish.
I suppose it is more correct to hate ideologies and actions than it is to hate people as individuals. But that's a fine distinction to make. If people hate Hitler for his actions I wouldn't hold it against them.
I made this word choice deliberately. Regarding Islamists, my use of lunacy is not of a technical, medical term for insanity. It is unlikely that such a number of clinically insane people exist. Ideological lunacy can brainwash perfectly normal people into doing insane and terrible things. A majority of Germans and perhaps even a majority of Nazis weren't clinically insane or lunatics, yet many were complicit or actively participated in atrocities.
My comparison should be clear when you understand that not all mental disorders are related to insanity or lunacy, for instance epilepsy (funny enough, the word lunacy historically referred to epilepsy caused by moonlight). More pertinently, not all suicidal people are lunatics, unless you consider people who are depressed or suffering from alcoholism to be clinically insane. To me, that'd be a a dilution of the term.
Maybe even more eye-opening, some suicidal people are not suffering a mental disorder of any kind. Would you categorize the people who killed themselves in Nazi concentration camps to be harmful to others, inconsiderate and selfish? There are plenty of bad reasons to commit suicide, but to call any type of suicide inconsiderate and selfish is narrow-minded in my view.
I'm afraid I do believe that all suicide is selfish. I suppose extenuating circumstances could make suicide to be a reasonable choice and those circumstances would outweigh the selfish nature of the act. So, although you think me narrow minded I see your argument as failing to take all things into account.
As to hating someone like Hitler. I still think it is unhealthy. Hating actions is not the same as hating an individual. That involves putting yourself into the position of being judge and jury of the totality of the essence of another human being and, unfortunately once we do that our own humanity is diminished. If you think you are good enough to do that with one, others come easily. I'm not certain any of us are all that.
If those extenuating circumstances 'outweigh' the selfishness how can you conclude it's selfish at all? I suppose if you consider any action that provides some benefit to an individual then suicide can be considered selfish, along with any other action (reminds me of a conversation in Friends, that there's no such thing as a selfless deed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DowJfUm … l=TimHelen I'm surprisingly inclined to agree with Joey).
Wouldn't thinking that suicide is selfish put you as being the judge and jury of the totality of the essence of another human being?
Not at all. I think you are looking at things as if there is only one factor or that the most prevalent factor is the only one that should be considered. I don't. It's like people talking about being altruistic; as if they are somehow doing something wonderful for others. The truth of the matter is that one gains more, or as much, for themselves (the good feeling you get) than the person they claim to be showing a selfless concern for. So, in a way, any act of kindness has an element of selfishness involved.
Basically, every action has a multitude of motivating factors. The 10 percent, the 50 percent and the 2 percent are all motivating factors. All are of some importance and should be analyzed to better understand what motivates us. Think about it. If the 2 percent were only 1 percent; would the 50 percent be the same?
Don't get me wrong. I feel pain for someone who is compelled toward suicide. It is sad that they feel so disconnected from others that they have to bear that pain alone. I knew a guy who committed suicide and I have a niece who is emotionally scarred for life because her boyfriend committed suicide in front of her. I have an uncle who contemplated it. He called my father and asked for a revolver. My father took it to him. Not because he wanted him to end his life, but he knew how much pain he was in and how hopeless the prognosis. He loved my uncle enough to give him the choice. He didn't do it, thankfully. But, it was his choice to make.
But, if the person contemplating the act were thinking it through; if they considered how their actions would affect those around them they wouldn't do it. The guy sent his mother into a spiral down of depression that she will never recover from. His father is still heartbroken that he didn't see the signs. My niece will never be the same. How would my father have felt had his brother followed through with the act? The living deserve as much consideration as the dead.
"Not at all."
Yes you are. You are judging all of them to be selfish and inconsiderate based on their decision without knowing what the majority of them are going through, their factors and circumstances. I have no problem with you judging people's actions, but you should know that that's exactly what you are doing if you don't want to be judge and jury.
"I think you are looking at things as if there is only one factor or that the most prevalent factor is the only one that should be considered."
I don't know how you can conclude that given how I've just outlined that there is no such thing as a [completely] selfless deed. That's because every action is composed of selfish and selfless motivations. Arguably you are the one making that mistake by painting all suicidal people as selfish. There are other factors, and selfishness is not the only one, and arguably not the main one unless you consider the desire to be free from suffering to be selfish.
"Basically, every action has a multitude of motivating factors. The 10 percent, the 50 percent and the 2 percent are all motivating factors. All are of some importance and should be analyzed to better understand what motivates us. Think about it. If the 2 percent were only 1 percent; would the 50 percent be the same?"
Mathematically, if the 2 percent went to 1 percent, then the 50 percent, the 10 percent and the 38 remaining percent would all increase by .33 percent. I'd need a relevant example because I have no idea what point you're trying to make.
"The living deserve as much consideration as the dead."
Sometimes a suicidal act is out of consideration for others, whether perceived consideration like a depressed person thinking that it's better that they don't burden anyone, a tangible consideration like an elder killing himself to allow more food for a community, or whether it's directly saving lives like a soldier jumping onto a grenade.
Sometimes a suicidal act can't be out of consideration for others because there are no others to consider. Yes, there are people who don't have families or friends or loved ones. Would you judge them to be selfish?
?? The act of being selfish is an action so I'm not sure I follow your point here.
That's funny. Here you've pasted me saying exactly what you are arguing in defense of.
That's what I said. I'd think, at this point, we weren't bothering to read what the other wrote but I'm obviously reading your comments. Maybe you should read mine prior to responding?
I haven't argued that point. See my previous comment.
I can only assume you are being willfully confused here. If I put half of a particular ingredient called for into a dish I would not have the same dish. The ingredient I'm changing could have a negligible effect or a major one. The same is true with life. If 10 percent of what motivates me is altruistic and 5 percent selfish my actions may be completely different than if it were the other way around. It isn't a simple add to one subtract from the other. Especially during the course of a lifetime of action. One way the outcome could be that I could live the life of a Mother Theresa. The other I could reason a justification for running a truck through a crowd.
First. Sacrificing your life to save another is not classified as suicide.
Second, if it's a financial thing can you argue that all parties involved would rather see the person dead, than to deal with the financial burden of a loved one being ill? Would you argue the suicide victim was factoring this in?
The one you claim might not have any loved ones. With billions of people on this planet they couldn't find someone they cared enough about? One can love, without feeling loved. Does the person who swings a hammer for Habitat for Humanity know the people who will benefit from this act? Does the organ donor personally know the recipient?
Sorry. Most suicide is, ultimately, about being lost in your own perceived problems. Whether it be 1%, 5%, 10% or 100% there is an element of selfishness to the act. Self absorbed is another way to put it. Wrong or right, good or bad, it is what it is.
"?? The act of being selfish is an action so I'm not sure I follow your point here."
There is no such thing as an "act of being selfish." There are actions, and you are assigning a qualifier to the action, that being "selfish." I am suggesting that qualifying all of a given action as "selfish" when there are a multitude of factors in play and when you can't be aware of every individual circumstance is acting like a judge and jury.
"That's funny. Here you've pasted me saying exactly what you are arguing in defense of."
I will repeat what you said and evaluate what I'm really in defense of:
I think you are looking at things as if there is only one factor or that the most prevalent factor is the only one that should be considered.
Am I looking at things as if there is only one factor? No, that should be obvious by now given how I've said, twice now, that there are several factors going into an action.
Am I suggesting that the most prevalent factor is the only one that should be considered? No. Where did you get that from? If you are "obviously" reading my comments, you are reading them incorrectly.
"That's what I said.
I'm aware of what you said. You've said two conflicting things:
a) all types of suicide is selfish
b) every action has a multitude of motivating factors
You need to reconcile these two stances with clarification: do you consider any % of selfishness enough to classify something as selfish? Or do you consider suicides to have a greater than 50% selfish factor? If it's the former, then your classification is moot because any action will be considered selfish by that standard. If it's the latter, then you are making a significant judgement without possibly having evidence.
"I can only assume you are being willfully confused here."
Odd assumption on your part. Why are we talking about actions being dictated by motivating factors? That is obvious. What point are you trying to make by saying "if something went from 1 to 2%, the 50% would not be significantly changed"? Yes, that is true if you change your % altruism and selfishness your actions would change. That's obvious. What is your point? Was I contesting this anywhere?
"First. Sacrificing your life to save another is not classified as suicide."
Yes it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide#Rational https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruistic_suicide
Or perhaps you mean to say it's not classified as suicide by conventional terms, namely of despair, suffering and hopelessness. Which is what I said of the Nice terrorist. But you still classify that as suicide. Or at the very least, suicidal. Which is what jumping on a grenade would be, even if it were done to save people.
Here's an example from Enemy at the Gates:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhFHM6V … MUNISTBEAR
"Second, if it's a financial thing can you argue that all parties involved would rather see the person dead, than to deal with the financial burden of a loved one being ill? Would you argue the suicide victim was factoring this in?"
I didn't bring up finance. I brought up food, as in, there is a starving Inuit tribe and an elder kills himself to save the tribe. The Inuit do factor that in and consider it a sign of courage and respect.
But yes, when dealing with illness there are cases where all parties involved would rather see the person not suffering. That amounts to them being dead. This death isn't necessarily due to suicide or euthanasia and it doesn't have to be due to financial reasons. They can simply let the disease run its course, like a cancer patient opting to not undergo chemotherapy to enjoy the last few months of life without the complications of treatment.
"One can love, without feeling loved."
Not the point. This is the point: if they considered how their actions would affect those around them they wouldn't do it. Whether or not they love someone is irrelevant to whether or not that loved person is meaningfully affected. If they have nobody that loves them, their death will affect nobody.
Whether it be 1%, 5%, 10% or 100% there is an element of selfishness to the act.
This is true of any act. There's also an element of selfishness to eating, or sleeping, or having discussions on the internet. What is your point in classifying suicide as selfish for having x% selfish motivations, if any other act will have x% selfish motivations?
<bangs head against wall>
I have, repeatedly, said that there are a multitude of factors in play. My first comment 34 hours ago was Any type of suicide does harm to others, is inconsiderate of one's fellow man and is self centered and selfish. There I named it as inconsiderate, self centered and selfish. You chose to focus on the selfish part.
24 hours ago I stated this I'm afraid I do believe that all suicide is selfish. I suppose extenuating circumstances could make suicide to be a reasonable choice and those circumstances would outweigh the selfish nature of the act. So, although you think me narrow minded I see your argument as failing to take all things into account. Since this appears to be unclear to you I'll explain. Since extenuating circumstances would result in suicide being a reasonable choice then it is assumed I am saying that there are other factors because I said the selfish nature of the act would be outweighed. Outweighed. More significant than. Whatever compelled that person outweighed the selfishness of the act. Which means (I hate to be so redundant but you are forcing this on me) other factors were more compelling than selfishness. But, I still believe selfishness is a factor.
21 hours ago I stated I think you are looking at things as if there is only one factor or that the most prevalent factor is the only one that should be considered. I don't. If you were confused up to that point, that statement, alone, should have clued you in that I did not, or never intended to, say that selfishness alone was the motivating force.
10 hours ago I attempted, again, to make sure you understood we were in agreement on the fact that there can be any number of factors. The fact that you are still arguing a point we were in agreement on prior to the beginning of this conversation is, to be quite frank, mind boggling.
If you review my comments you will see that I have (on at least one occasion) pointed out that I thought we were in agreement on this point. It is obvious to me. I'm not certain why we are still discussing that as if we are not.
I have said (again, repeatedly) that there are many motivating factors for our actions. Claiming that suicide is selfish does not conflict with that statement. Example;
The apple is red.
The apple is red and juicy.
Apparently, the apple is still red. Does that make the first statement conflict with the second? Is the apple less red, or more red? The same amount?
I have no idea what percentage selfishness is involved in the individual case. How could I? But, I stand by the statement that suicide is selfish. Even if judged to be 1%, then it is still selfish in nature.
You said Mathematically, if the 2 percent went to 1 percent, then the 50 percent, the 10 percent and the 38 remaining percent would all increase by .33 percent.
That appears to be implying that a slight change in one motivating factor could only result in a slight change in action. If that was not your intent then explain, please.
Honestly, I think you are splitting hairs here but, OK. If you want to call sacrificing your life to ensure the survival of another as suicide then I'll leave it at that.
That isn't suicide. I'm surprised you would equate the two.
I've always argued in favor of that point so no argument there.
"<bangs head against wall>"
You misunderstood me. When I said you qualified all of a given action to be selfish, I was not referring to you qualifying any specific act of suicide as 100% selfish. I was referring to your estimation that all suicides have a degree of selfishness to them. At that point I was not sure if you were assuming that suicides are greater than 50% selfish (making them mostly selfish) or if any degree of selfishness is enough for you to label it as selfish. Evidently, you think any degree of selfishness is enough for you to label all suicides as selfish. As I alluded to, thinking any amount of selfishness in an action is enough to label it selfish dilutes the term to the point of meaningless, because now every action can be considered selfish, selfless and everything in between.
By the way, I shortened it to "selfish" because that is the main umbrella topic. Self centered and inconsiderateness are either highly related or synonymous with selfishness. In that sense you are using three different synonyms to emphasize the point of selfishness, not to focus on a different motivating factor. Using your apple example, it would be like saying the apple is red, scarlet and wine. That's just a minor point because I never accused you of assigning only selfishness to suicide. I was just baffled that you used that as an example, it's terribly weak.
"If you review my comments you will see that I have (on at least one occasion) pointed out that I thought we were in agreement on this point. It is obvious to me. I'm not certain why we are still discussing that as if we are not."
You seemed to say that I was arguing in defense of looking at things as if there is only one factor. Forgive me if that wasn't your intent, but you can hardly blame me given that you directly stated that I was looking at things as if there is only one factor when that was never the case.
The apple is red.
The apple is red and juicy.
This is a poor analogy because we are now measuring something on two different metrics: juiciness and redness. The apple can be 100% red and 100% juicy. An action cannot be both 100% selfish and 100% selfless. An action can be both 100% selfish and 100% dangerous, for instance. If we were discussing actions in those terms your analogy would make sense.
I have no idea what percentage selfishness is involved in the individual case. How could I? But, I stand by the statement that suicide is selfish. Even if judged to be 1%, then it is still selfish in nature.
Let's stick to colours and use your example of an apple. We'll take a look at this one:
The apple is red. But the apple is also white, and brown, and green, and black, and a multitude of colours in between.
Would it be useful to say that this and other red apples are white in nature, even though red apples are 90% red?
That appears to be implying that a slight change in one motivating factor could only result in a slight change in action. If that was not your intent then explain, please.
I don't see a problem in stating that a slight change in one motivating factor could result in a slight change in action. But my intent was to facetiously explain how percentages work, because I have no idea what your point was. I still don't, in fact. There are motivating factors, and changing them will change actions. This is as self-evident as the colours in an apple.
Honestly, I think you are splitting hairs here but, OK. If you want to call sacrificing your life to ensure the survival of another as suicide then I'll leave it at that.
I am not the one splitting hairs. I do not consider such things as suicide by conventional terms. That's the third time I've said that. The point of the comparison is because you consider killing 100+ people and then getting shot and killed to be an act of suicide when it's clearly distinct from a mentally disturbed person wanting to end their suffering.
That isn't suicide. I'm surprised you would equate the two.
Are you not reading what I said? This is what you captured of my quote: This death isn't necessarily due to suicide or euthanasia and it doesn't have to be due to financial reasons. Followed by an example where it was not suicide or euthanasia.
Again, to remind you, it is because you said: can you argue that all parties involved would rather see the person dead, than to deal with the financial burden of a loved one being ill?. Yes, I can argue that. I can argue that without it needing to be based on financial burdens and without it needing to be suicide or euthanasia. In other words, there are situations where all parties involved would rather see the person dead (i.e. not suffering) period, regardless of financial situation and regardless of whether it was a direct act of suicide/euthanasia or whether they simply let the disease run its course.
I've always argued in favor of that point so no argument there.
You didn't answer the question. What is the point of classifying everything as selfish because everything has some % of selfishness? This is the fundamental point being disputed. What is the point of classifying apples as white, brown or black because there is some % of those colours in apples?
I'll simply address your final point because most of the rest are (in my opinion) piddly points. It really all boils down to my calling suicide selfish.
Selfish, in my opinion, is the catalyst. You can add anything you want as justification for the action but, unless one is putting oneself into the position of saving another life (such as falling onto a grenade) suicide would not be an option taken if all other factors were taken into account. We all have something valuable to contribute to the rest of humanity. Selfishness compels us to ignore this.
Is it 1% or 99%? Does it matter enough to argue about it? I don't think so because it is one factor, no matter how large or small the percentage of its presence which can move us into a direction of taking an action that can adversely affect others without taking their needs into account.
As with all things, there are no absolutes. So, I will concede that there can be the odd incident where no selfishness is involved although as I believe you agreed, there is an element of selfishness in all human action.
You have still not answered the question. What is the point of singling out suicide as selfish if every action is selfish?
I wasn't aware that I was singling it out. It was a simple comment. But, the living can always strive to overcome this tendency. The dead? We can never know.
Personally, if you ask me, I think you have too much time on your hands to devote so much inquiry to this.
I'd like to know how many other things you've accused of being selfish at their slightest mention. Not many, I imagine. Maybe you are just oblivious that suicide has been regularly singled out as a selfish act, not just by you but by other people who make ignorant, simple comments.
Ironically, your accusation of selfishness is itself selfish:
If suicide is considered selfish, is it not also selfish to demand that the person continue living, often in physical or emotional torment, just for your sake? To guilt someone into living in constant pain (again, this could be physical pain caused by a disability, or emotional pain, both of which may or may not be treatable) every day just so you aren't sad is an even more selfish act than that person ending their life.
The choice that person made, for their own life, isn't all about you.
People do not have an obligation to live in suffering because of your whims, even if they are worthy causes. We put down our dog because she was suffering, the prognosis was poor and even with a successful procedure she'd continue suffering and remain with a poor quality of life. We would have fought tooth and nail for her, but we didn't want to potentially keep her alive for a few more months in suffering just for us. That would have been the epitome of selfishness. Now imagine demanding that of another human being.
It takes time to make a meaningful inquiry into any given thing. If such inquiry prevents marginalization of vulnerable groups I will continue to do so. Perhaps you haven't dedicated enough time which is why you're limited to simple comments. Some might accuse you of being selfish for it.
On this we can agree. And from whence does this mindset come? It comes from the mind being manipulated by religious dogma, and from the social customs that are promoted and perpetuated by oppressive governments; from the same sources of manipulation that have caused me to suffer an amazing amount of verbal abuse, simply for displaying a level of narcissism that, compared to common standards, has reached near toxic levels.
Sexy Names For Sexy People
You do not need my approval, nor do I suspect you would ever seek it. And after receiving your unwarranted criticisms, I am not inclined to hold hands and go skipping through a quiet meadow of timothy, and sweet clover. And so, upon this firm and immovable foundation, I can understand that the name you have chosen suits your character, as it appears you are interested in learning and personal growth.
Furthermore, it is apparent that you, as well as many others, are not comfortable expressing your sexy ways through a digital medium. But I have seen much of what many believe lies hidden from the public view. However, "seen" is only there for the flow, and to make it pretty. It is actually a feeling, and of course you understand. Everyone can be sexy, but they cannot be sexy like me. Please, I do not pity those whom I will never touch, or those who might never ascend to this elevation. They could never miss what they have never known. And so for me ... there is no shame.
I sense excess emotion here so I'll assume this is a sensitive topic for you. I apologize if I've hit a nerve.
I've never suggested someone should go on living on my account. I believe I mentioned a family member who contemplated it and was given the means to do it. I supported that decision.
And since I have repeatedly stated that there is an element of selfishness in all of our actions I can unequivocally say that it is your emotional bias turning this into an issue.
Suicide is selfish. Deal with it, or not. It isn't an accusation, just a simple statement of fact.
The "excess" emotion you sensed was annoyance at being levied unfounded accusations, the latest of having "too much time on my hands" for talking about this topic. Life and death are topics that many dedicate their entire lives discussing, and you accuse me of having "too much time" to discuss it. It's a stupefying deflection.
You've proven incapable of understanding the point. The more you repeat yourself the more you undo your claim. If we define everything as selfish, then suicide is selfish, not-suicide is selfish, and everything in between is selfish. Your standards dilute the word to the point of meaningless.
I could define, like some have, any mention of race as racist. That would be an arbitrary standard. Both you and I have mentioned race in our posts. We are not racist by any reasonable interpretation. But to those using that arbitrary (and questionable) standard, we'd be racist. For them to then say something to the effect of: "You're racist. Deal with it, or not. It isn't an accusation, just a simple statement of fact." would be nonsensical, especially if such standards are so weak as to be applicable to just about anything and anyone.
There are obvious implications for being accused of selfishness, racism, sexism etc. Such accusations are meant to silence or shame people into not doing an action. If you honestly weren't attempting to guilt those considering suicide, then what were you trying to do?
Silence or shame? Guilt those considering suicide? What do you think people are? Sheep? Unable to think for themselves, or ponder the reasons for a statement? I have more respect for others than that.
LOL. It was a comment. You took offense. Don't attempt to project that onto others.
The fact that the American people still believe in a two party system, when both parties are actually the same party, and where what is championed as a democracy is actually an oligarchy, can only indicate that a great majority of Americans are not very "educated". Consequently, it is not unfair to compare the majority to a herd of sheep, or goats.
I have spent my entire lifetime attempting to ensure my nose stays short enough that I don't have to look down on people. No small feat considering the family I come from.
People are not as dumb as some find the need to believe.
Succinct, and poetic. Now that we have a firm foundation, how do you explain the condition of the world? If you are suggesting that a majority are intelligent, then the majority must also be sado-masochists. And I have never found pain to be sexy on either end of the stick.The average IQ is between 85-114, which amounts to 68% of those who have been tested. My IQ is in the 2.3% bracket above that. Above my level is the genius level.
Here are the facts:
A majority say they believe in things that they don't even understand, which cannot be considered intelligence. Many Americans will say they believe in Democracy. Yet, they don't know the difference between a democracy, a republic, or a democratic republic. And they know even less about communism, socialism, or anarchy. Yet, they will take a certain position, and raise arguments on issues they truly know nothing about. And we can see this played out in every aspect of American life. Wealthy, powerful, and intelligent people have used their intellectual superiority to oppress, to exploit, and to enslave a majority who are of a lesser intelligence. There is simply no other way to look at it.
If a majority were at my level, I can't imagine that the world would be in such a mess. Just look at what happened to Edward Snowden! The people did not stand behind him. He is a true patriot. He put is life on the line for the American people. He exposed the evil being perpetrated against us by our own government. He is not a terrorist, or a murderer, or a thief. But what did the ignorant majority do? They threw him under the bus! And he is a very sexy man.
I've never been a fan of using IQ as a gauge for intelligence. I test very high on IQ tests also. Does that make me smarter? Sure. I am smarter in some ways. But even those who seem the simplest make profound observations. I've had people who appear to be dumb as rocks astound me.
It isn't a lack of intelligence which has landed us here. Call it a lack of compassion. We judge most things by how it affects us, personally. We close our eyes to the bigger picture. If you make someone relatively comfortable they ignore many things which, although might be highly beneficial to others, may jeopardize their own comfort level.
I've talked to people who question the value of interest in the plight of people in other parts of the world. 'It doesn't affect me' they say. They aren't interested enough to think how it does. It isn't a lack of intelligence, in my opinion. It's a lack of interest. A lack of compassion.
Which brings us to Edward Snowden. People don't want their happy little bubble shaken up. It doesn't make them ignorant.
As long as the powers that be convince the majority that they are better off here they will not ponder the value of the there.
Obviously you see the problem. It seems you just don't want to go that extra mile and admit it. I am aware that it's not socially acceptable to publicly acknowledge such things, but it's not helping to make the world a better place by pretending the Emperor has new clothes, when he's actually standing there naked!
Now, based on your previous commentary, I'm a sure that you get the metaphor. But I have been accused of going off topic, or being out in left field for making such comments in the past. In this case, people aren't ignoring the truth,they simply don't get it. And if that's not ignorant, stupid, or just plain dumb, then I truly don't know what is. But there are many more examples: Another example is the state of Hawaii. I'll bet that 90% of Americans don't know that Hawaii was invaded by the United States in 1893, and only became a state at the point of a gun. I'll bet that most of them also don't know that President Bill Clinton apologized to the Hawaiian people in 1993.
But one of the most overlooked examples of mainstream stupidity is how the human body, and sexuality have been defined as "indecent" and "obscene". The human body, and human sexuality have essentially been outlawed in the United States, with nudity and sexuality only being allowed within certain social parameters. We can clearly see how an ignorant society has perverted human sexuality.
Yesterday I read a Hub about breast feeding in public. It is unfortunate that women have to fight for the right to nurse their children in public. But I take it ten steps further, as I am of a superior intellect. I am greatly offended that it is "illegal" to be nude in most public places, and I am also offended that it is also illegal to have sexual intercourse in public places. This will sound bizarre to many. Why? Because they are not so intelligent, and they cannot see the bigger picture. And so I deliver another great teaching:
People will gather around a boxing ring and watch 2 men, or 2 women beat the hell out of each other; sometimes until one of them is knocked unconscious, or until they are beaten unto death! People will even watch such brutal spectacles with their children; two people inflicting pain upon each other. And how do the spectators respond? When a man is knocked down, and lies there like a broken rag doll, the people will jump up and cheer like barbarians.
However, if two people jumped into the same boxing ring, and started having sexual intercourse; making strange sounds while moving in a vigorous circular motion, in front of millions of people, they would promptly be arrested for indecency and lewd behavior! The contrast I have provided clearly illustrates the perverse nature of American society. What is good and holy has been held up as obscene. But brutality,and violence has been accepted as the norm. We live in a society that champions sado-masochistic behavior. We can hurt each other in public, but we cannot provide sexual healing in public. We can give and receive pain in public, but we cannot give and receive pleasure in public. This is a gross perversion of human nature.
Just like the bootleggers profited during prohibition, the porn industry has capitalized on this perversion by flooding the internet with pornography. As a result, millions of men have become addicted to cyber-sex. And the detrimental aspect of cyber-sex is as follows. Cyber-sex provides an easy outlet for men to relieve their sexual frustrations. The human male has a very active libido, and at the age of 25, it was not uncommon for me to engage in sexual intercourse 3 or 4 times a day, 7 days a week. But when men are engaged in cyber-sex, they are destroying their motivation to seek out a "real" sexual partner. Once they reach the "happy place", the sex drive has been tamed, and so they will move on and attend to other matters. Men who become addicted to cyber-sex will begin to lose their ability to connect with real women. And young men who are still developing their sexuality, can be seriously crippled by such behavior. They will never master the social skills that have allowed me to have a healthy and vibrant sex life; a sex life not inhabited by digital images of hot and sexy women, but with real 3 dimensional women; sexy women who break a sweat , make funny noises, and smell like real women. I'm sure that many who are offended by my whelming sincerity, superiority, and sexiness, have never experienced such a free and sexy man. But just like the lottery, there is a possibility that some of you might win.
Out of kindness, and goodwill toward the majority, you will not say what you know in your heart is true. But I am done trying to appease them. I have unceremoniously kicked them to the curb. Let the gravity force them down, and far away from me. I have delivered the medicine. And my medicine is strong and true. And the world must go the way of almighty God! For if not, the level of servitude and oppression for your children, and your children's children, will be much greater than our own. Stupid people must step aside; the majority must step aside. The dimwitted man must get out of the way and allow the superior man, the Ubermensch, to break the shackles and the chains that have securely bound us all. The window is about to close, and there is no time for us to hold hands and sing Kumbaya. It's time to "Strike Up the Band!"
I think one of the primary things keeping us from breaking the shackles is fear of one another. Fear that some will think themselves superior to others and attempt to enslave them to their ideas and ideals.
I think it is a valid fear. I do believe it is time to 'Strike up the band' as you put it; but we need some unifying force we trust enough to move in that direction; as a whole. Even then, the way is fraught with danger.
You're aware that those who are suicidal suffer from mental disorders, you said so yourself. This is not applicable to all but generally, this is true. In that sense, saying that those people are "unable to think for themselves, or ponder the reasons for a statement" is very close to the mark. They are unable to think for themselves because their mental disorders prevent them from thinking clearly. For you to expect clear thinking from the suicidal shows how shallow your understanding of suicide is.
Did I accuse you of being offended, or anyone else, for that matter? How am I projecting offense onto others if I haven't even mentioned offense? The only one here attributing offense to anyone is you.
OK, if you weren't offended I will apologize for reading your remarks as such, but you were coming on more strongly than seemed warranted.
As to your statement about me expecting clear thinking from a suicidal shows shallowness in my understanding? Out of curiosity, have you ever been suicidal? I've had suicidal thoughts. I used to suffer from serious depression. So, my understanding of suicidal thoughts comes from experience. From looking back at those moments and attempting to understand what put me there, what kept me there, and also analyzing the thoughts which pulled me away from it. Now, when depression starts to move in that direction I remind myself of things I have been through, conclusions I have come to and actively remind myself that what I am feeling isn't how I truly feel, it will pass. So, even though you cannot think clearly when in the grips of it there are always ways around that. For someone to claim that there isn't is a cop out on the part of the individual and unwarranted excuses made by others. You may think you are doing someone some type of favor by insisting that they cannot deal with their own life and need someone to make excuses to make them feel better about their shortcomings, but I have enough faith in others to believe they truly have no shortcomings, if they take the time to think about it and can deal with their own lives and can take the time and effort to analyze the whats and whys in their lives.
Mine is one experience. I know that this doesn't cover the entire gamut of suicidal scenarios but having been there and done that I can assure you that I did think at the time, and think now, that suicide is (on some levels) selfish.
I have heard many people express such sentiments. But I have also found that many of these people have never dealt with life under the most extreme circumstances. No matter what trials they go through, they have always had a safety net. But there are many who have fallen through the cracks who do not have such a safety net. All of their family and friends are either dead or have abandoned them. No one cares if they live or die, and so suicide for these people is pragmatic, and a positive form of selfishness.
What good is it for them to continue to suffer in an indifferent world? It is better to move on to the next. That is what I will do if necessary. I will not sit tied to a chair in a nursing home with a stupid party hat placed on my head. This I have seen with my own eyes. And it's not very sexy. Nor will I slowly die of cancer while the doctors, the technicians, and the pharmaceutical companies, all profit from my misery. There are many valid reasons for suicide that do not point to a negative form of selfishness.
Many Christians will say that a person who commits suicide is going to hell. But the Bible also says that it is a sin to steal, to murder, and to worship money over God. This is clearly stated throughout the Bible. But Christians in America, for the last 500+ years, have not been standing in line to return the land and the resources that their ancestors stole from my people ... after they raped and murdered them! Why? Because they want to hold on to the land, their money, and their possessions. But even under the current laws, it is illegal to possess and trade in stolen property. So it looks like there will be a lot of Christians going to hell, whether they commit suicide or not.
I firmly believe if heaven exists a suicide victim would be taken straight in because they need to know that love the most.
But, you are right. For some it would be a sweet relief and that is their choice to make.
I think Mr popo sees calling the act selfish as somehow critical of the act. It isn't. As you said, selfish can easily be the right thing to be for the individual.
Had to add an edit. I'm sure you'd still be sexy as an old man tied to a chair with a stupid party hat. Never doubt yourself.
Somehow this is the fourth or fifth time I find myself in agreement with you. I thought a broken clock was only right twice a day.
I kid of course. But I will challenge you on a minor semantic point:
"No one cares if they live or die, and so suicide for these people is pragmatic, and a positive form of selfishness."
Selfishness is lacking consideration for others. If there are no others to consider, you can't be acting selfishly.
I'd also argue that a basic requirement of the human (or perhaps the living) experience is to be free of suffering. I won't judge those who seek relief from that suffering, just like I don't judge the thief who robs an apple to relieve his hunger.
And so now you stand sorely rebuked! Now you are guilty of what you accused me of doing before. Your conclusion is based on only one element of a definition, to the exclusion of all else. Yes, when it is applicable, that one element correctly defines the subject. But under different circumstances, that particular element may not apply. In many definitions, various elements can function independently, as well as a whole.
Selfishness: Two Definitions
devoted to or caring only for oneself; concerned primarily with one's own interests, benefits, welfare, etc., regardless of others. (Dictionary.com)
having or showing concern only for yourself and not for the needs or feelings of other people. Source: Merriam-Webster's
And on your last point there is no argument here. I agree that it is a basic human right to be free of suffering, whether that suffering be physical, mental, or brought about by religious, or political oppression.
I understand that the definitions I have provided both include the element "regardless, or in spite of the needs of others". And I also understand the word is generally used as a negative. But I am promoting a more useful, and realistic method of defining the emotion. Just as with "Love" and "Hate", I think it is more appropriate to define selfishness as either a negative or positive. From my perspective, every act I commit is a selfish act. For instance, if I help an older woman, or a woman who has been crippled, across the street, it is a selfish act on two different levels. First and foremost, it makes me feel good about my self, and so in this way I am receiving a certain pleasure, or benefit. On another level, I understand that if the woman is intelligent enough to see that I am sexy, and if I feel that she is sexy too, then I have only helped myself to a new and exciting relationship . And so, we can see that helping a woman across the street is never a bad idea.
Or imagine that I am standing at the train station, and a little boy runs into the path of an oncoming train. Of course, the world will cheer, and the newspapers will proclaim that I am a brave hero! And of course that would be true. But the world will not know that before the near tragic event, while standing there at the station, I observed the same little boy standing there with his unmarried mother, and she was very sexy. Yes, if the little boy had been an orphan, I would have still saved him from a most terrible fate, but the knowledge of his sexy mother made the risk even more worthwhile. And do I need to explain? We have all seen Forrest Gump, and we are all aware of how gratitude for a great kindness bestowed upon a child, can kindle the deepest passions of a sexy woman.
Neither definition disagrees with me. However, I did say it was a minor semantic point. In the hypothetical instance where someone is completely alone, it is impossible for them to be selfish or selfless, because there is nobody else's needs to consider relative to their personal needs. If nobody cares for a person they are at their closest to being completely alone, thus that should reflect how "selfish" their actions are.
"From my perspective, every act I commit is a selfish act."
I've beaten this to death and back again. If you define every act as selfish independent on the primary motivations of an act then it becomes a meaningless term. It's not useful to classify everything from "talking" to "eating" to "saving a child" as selfish. If 99% of your motivation for rescuing that child is to save its life, and the other 1% is to potentially start a romance with its mother, then your actions are still primarily selfless.
Your premise is correct based on the common usage of the word. And so, there is no disagreement on that point. Perhaps I did not make myself clear. My argument is that the definition needs to be refined to avoid such confusion and debate as we see here. This is another reason the world is getting ready to explode. The language itself is lacking, and often leaves too much room for interpretation. Hate,Love,Selfish,Racism: These are just a few of the words that are open to various interpretations. Refining the definitions, or creating new words with more specific definitions would allow us to better communicate, and to express our ideas.
There's been no disagreement about the definition of selfish. The disagreement is on the subjective evaluations on things that we consider to be selfish or not. I don't find it useful or accurate to evaluate actions as selfish because the action has a greater than 0% of selfishness, just like I don't find it useful to describe apples as white because of a few white specks.
I find it very useful. As to selfishness, it is very useful to understand what motivates. An individual who spends no time attempting to understand the why can't grow. We have to know what the impetus behind our actions is. If we like the action it is helpful to know what motivates. The same holds true for the opposite.
As to being accurate? It depends on what angle you are approaching it from. If someone asks 'What is the single factor which is the highest motivator to making a person commit suicide anyone would say 'it depends on the individual'. If you ask what factors are present in all suicide scenarios selfishness would have to be included in the list.
And an apple with 1% of its surface containing white spots may be of little interest to the average consumer. Someone in the apple industry may see it differently. They may understand all factors which contributed to and resulted in that variation. I prefer to be the person who attempts to understand the whys not the individual who believes nothing is of importance unless it is the most prevalent trait. Or, worse, the one who considers the 1% of variation to be somehow a negative.
I never said it was not useful to find the motivations behind our actions. Of course that’s important.
Right now you’re conflating two different things. Assuming all actions have some % selfishness is potentially useful to know. Identifying specific actions as selfish (when selfish is defined as any % selfishness) is not useful because it doesn't distinguish the action from any other one in any meaningful way since literally every other action will have some % of selfishness, and ignores the other predominant characteristics of that action. Some actions may be significantly selfish whereas some actions may be barely selfish at all.
My argument is that singling out a base universal motivator as characteristic of a given action is:
a) not useful in distinguishing that action, because literally every other action will also have this characteristic
b) can ignore the other predominant characteristics of said action
If we were to use your summation of suicide for other actions we’d get this:
- All suicides are selfish
- All child rescues are selfish
- All eating is selfish
- All murders for money are selfish
- All sacrifices are selfish
- All protection of loved ones is selfish
- All hoarding of resources is selfish
- All acts of charity are selfish
Ad infinitum. These statements are not distinctive from one another, despite each of these actions having significant variance of selfishness even within those subcategories.
Another universal in actions is danger. Literally everything has some degree of danger involved, some % of threat or harm attached to it. Using your summation:
- All guns are dangerous
- All chewing gum is dangerous
- All baby carriages are dangerous
- All roller coasters are dangerous
- All sleeping is dangerous
- All hugs are dangerous
- All talking is dangerous
- All jumping off ravines is dangerous
- All bombs are dangerous
- All plastic bags are dangerous
- All thumb tacks are dangerous
When you first described suicide killers, you said they were pushed to the edge; that they were desperate because of the powers that may be (which isn’t necessarily true but I won’t go there). When you described suicides (which are distinct from suicide attacks) you opted to say that all suicides are selfish, instead of saying that all suicides are desperate. If you were to say all suicides are desperate I’d have no issue, because most suicides are probably primarily a result of desperation.
But your primary summation of suicides was that they are selfish. That was how you chose to describe all suicides. I see this as analogous as stating that all chewing gum is dangerous, or that all sitting expends energy, or that all dogs are made of iron. All of those things are technically true, but those summations are not distinctive, unique or quantitatively significant. All actions are slightly dangerous, all actions require a certain amount of energy and, aside from a couple of unique bacterial species, all life forms are made of a small % of iron. If you were to say all bombs are dangerous, or that all running expends energy, or that all steel is made from iron, that would be more appropriate. That’s because we know bombs are significantly dangerous, we know running expends significant amounts of energy and we know that steel is 97%+ iron.
Again, this is not to say those universal traits are not important. It's useful to know that all actions are slightly dangerous, all actions require energy and that all (most) life forms are made up of iron. But using those universal traits as distinguishing characteristics of a given thing is not useful unless you think those universal traits are particularly prominent in a given action or thing. If you were to say bombs are dangerous, it'd suggest that bombs are particularly dangerous, not that bombs have some % of danger.
The angle one ought to approach this from is of highest motivator on average. Obviously things vary at the level of the individual, so saying “it depends on the individual” is not helpful. You should be asking "what is the highest motivator for suicides on average?" Then we'd look at the motivations across all suicides and determine which one is the highest motivator on average. I’d bet desperation would be at the forefront, not selfishness.
Again, I never said it’s not useful to know that an apple has 1% of its surface containing white spots. I said it’s not useful to characterize that apple as “white” because it has 1% of its surface covered in white spots. I don’t classify this Hubpage as “green” because there is a small green notification at the top right corner, even though it’s useful to know that there is a small green notification at the top right corner.
It is useful to know that suicides have some degree of selfishness, but it is not useful to state that suicides are selfish unless you think suicides are particularly selfish.
I think it is important primarily because of the finality of the act. Whatever all other motivating factors may be, the individual needs to remember that there are others who this action affects. That this action will forever prohibit the individual's ability to correct this part of their relationship. There may never be a time where those affected will be able to come to grips with this action because it is final. I am very sorry that this is a difficult thing for you to understand, but even at 1% it is a very big part of the act. A small percentage does not necessarily mean something is of negligible importance.
Even though everything we do carries a percentage of selfishness we have the ability, through our actions, to ensure that those we interact with understand that their wants and needs are of some importance to us also. We can be selfish and selfless in unison. We can vary the percentage of selfishness in our actions over the course of time so that those we interact with are negligibly effected by this ubiquitous human trait. Suicide is a final act. It ensures that there are no subsequent interactions. So, sorry, the presence of selfishness in this act no matter how small a percentage is important enough to be aware of.
If finality is the distinguishing factor any motivator of suicide would be important. You only chose to identify the potential explanatory factor of selfishness. You did not choose to identify other more significant and tangible factors like desperation, unclear and compromised thinking, drug abuse, mental illness, emotional or physical suffering etc. all of which are far stronger motivating factors than a nebulous and assumed % of selfishness.
So let's put it to the test and see how important selfishness is in terms of predicting suicide. What is the correlative strength between selfishness and suicide? Can you predict whether the most selfish people on the planet are more prone to suicide than the least selfish people? If you have any evidence I'd love to see it.
I will say that you continue to mischaracterize my position, which is odd given your accusations that I am the one having difficulty understanding. I never said selfishness in suicide is not important enough to be aware of. I said it is not significant enough to be a distinguishing trait for that particular action. This is despite the fact that I dedicated several examples and an entire paragraph to avoid that conflation:
Again, this is not to say those universal traits are not important. It's useful to know that all actions are slightly dangerous, all actions require energy and that all (most) life forms are made up of iron
I apologize if it isn't sufficiently clear, but I am not dismissing the importance of selfishness even if it is a small percentage. I am dismissing it as characteristic of suicides given that every other action has a base % of selfishness.
I didn't say I was not offended, I said I was not projecting my offense onto you, something you brought up out of thin air. I don't care whether someone is or is not offended, in some cases it can be a benefit to offend people with novel ideas. WB is actually a good example of that in some odd way. Whether you or I are offended is meaningless to me.
And yes, I've been suicidal from depression. You admit you cannot think clearly in the grips of it. I don't accuse those of selfishness for suffering an outcome under a situation where their thinking was compromised. The fact that there are ways around that doesn't mean that everyone is capable of finding those ways.
You personally might not be using selfishness as critical of the acts (though I still have trouble believing that) but you'd be the exception, especially in the context of suicide. Generally speaking people do speak critically of selfishness, from ancient philosophers to Christians to criminologists. At the very least it is not something that is typically desired or praised. Compare that with selflessness.
Whether it is praised, or not; doesn't change the fact that it is a part of life. I might as well criticize the sun for burning my skin.
Either way. I don't really care what you believe. I am not inclined to feel compelled to convince anyone of anything. Your choices of what you think reflect more about you, than me. I am secure enough in myself to know what I think and other people's complaints don't have much effect. Now, if they present a valid and reasonable argument that is different.
We are talking about the effects of human actions, not of the effects of inanimate objects. We don't criticize the sun for burning people because that would be nonsensical. We do criticize people who don't take necessary precautions while out in the sun and get themselves burned.
The point in stating that selfishness is primarily seen in a negative light, especially in the context of suicide, is to give some clue as to why I doubt your assertion that you did not mean to criticize selfishness. I am not asking you to convince me otherwise, I am simply being honest with my doubts.
Lickety Split ... Here We Go !
"But, if the person contemplating the act were thinking it through; if they considered how their actions would affect those around them they wouldn't do it."
Conditionally, a sexy man will agree with your sentiment. Of course, that condition is whether or not the person contemplating suicide has close friends and family. The suicide of a homeless person, or a Syrian refugee whose entire family has been killed by munitions provided by western forces, would hardly affect anyone at all. Who would even know? Who would even care?
Let us consider the homeless veteran: On any given night there are approx. 50,000 U.S. veterans sleeping on the streets here in the United States, and it is nothing less than an outrage! Many of these men and women have no one to turn to; not even the hypocrites who wave their flags, and sing their patriotic songs. They do not care if the veteran lives or dies. The fact that the American people allowed us to be sent to fight wars in Vietnam and the Middle East, wars that should have never been fought, gives us a clear indication that a majority of Americans haven't cared about veterans in the first place. And so, for any of these who commit suicide, I cannot consider it to be a selfish act; at least not selfishness as defined in a negative sense. From such a perspective, suicide is simply pragmatic.
I have often considered suicide, as I am of a superior intellect. Many have expressed that suicide is the result of unbearable emotional pain, and in doing so equate suicide with weakness. But I have found this to be generally false. It takes a very brave, and resolute individual to put a gun to their head and pull the trigger. There are several reasons why I have not committed suicide. One reason is the fact that I am not so brave. The other reason is because I am constantly chasing a muse, and I am not ready to give this up. But my thoughts of suicide have nothing to do with weakness.
Being very intelligent is very similar to being an imbecile. The imbecile, as well as the man of superior intellect, is essentially cutoff from the mainstream. It is very difficult for them to communicate their thoughts and ideas, because the mainstream simply cannot understand either one! Even when I surround my self with intelligent people, it hardly mitigates the foggy materialistic notions that permeate every aspect of modern life. Over the years, this becomes very tiresome, and debilitating. I am standing in the middle of a lost paradise, and for years I have seen the light at the end of the tunnel. But the world has gone mad, and they are all running lickety split in the opposite direction.
I'm reading this discussion. Your discussion seems reasonable and productive. The actual discussion topic itself (separate to your own reasonable talk) is totally bizarre.
Can I ask what made you settle into your rational talk in such an overtly bizarre title here??
I think the OP is simply having some fun with us. No one could be so far out there. He's actually very funny when you think about it.
But he made some comment about hatred which started this exchange.
Yeah it's funny but OP isn't allowing humour in this discussion. It's serious!? Is he serious!??
It's rare to come across something that is so off the planet. Posting pics of dead bodies at a time of global tragedy is way out there.
I saw the picture. It was rather creepy. I thought it was from a Civil War reenactment.
I keep imagining he is this really really old lonely bald guy living in a shack with weird stuff like body parts in the place! You know, with coke bottle thick glasses etc.
I'm happy to go along with humour but seriously is this for real? Wow
Things he's said in this thread pale in comparison to things said elsewhere. So, I'm happy to laugh here. It makes me believe his other statements were just staying with this bizarre part he's playing on hub pages.
I, too, imagine some old guy. But just one with a really quirky sense of humor.
There are no words in the English language that I am aware of which denote the duality of Love and Hate. Thus, I have had to create new terms that are unfamiliar. "Negative Hate", "Positive Hate", "Negative Love", "Positive Love". Although I find the terms I have coined to be cumbersome,I do not have the luxury of time. I suggest that someone who is so inclined, and who is at least half as intelligent, and half as sexy as I, should create a more petite terminology. Anyone familiar with various languages understands that there may be a word in one language that expresses a particular feeling or circumstance, whereas in another language there may be no appropriate translation. Often, we cannot solve a problem if we do not have the proper words to define it.
As you can see in the formula I have presented in the images, Love has no power over negative hate. Throwing Love at Negative hate is like spitting into the wind. And throwing Negative Hate at Negative Hate is like throwing gasoline on a fire. You have often heard the phrase "Fight Fire with Fire", and so you have heard the truth. Only Positive Hate can Destroy Negative Hate. Once the negative hate is destroyed, it is then that the emotion of Love can be applied as a creamy, sweet scented balm, to prevent the recurrence of Negative Hate. When comparing Martin Luther King to Malcolm X, people will commonly make the distinction that King was all about Peace and Love, and Malcolm was about Violent Resistance. But such conclusions are at best incomplete, and misleading. These two men were fundamentally the same in their views on racism. It was simply a difference in technique. Yes, it was "Positive Love" for their people which motivated them to devote, and to sacrifice their lives for freedom. But it was also their "Positive Hatred" of a system of racist oppression that also drove them forward. Positive Love and Positive Hate are not mutually exclusive, as they are inseparable.
This is the formula that has heretofore never been presented to mankind. This is the secret sauce of almighty God revealed. I am the first to present it. And so, let the world marvel at this great teaching; this great truth delivered to me by the Holy Spirit of God; the bounty of prayer and long-suffering that I have so humbly delivered to you in these darkest of days. When we consider the formula "Pain + (p) Hate = Deliverance From Evil", some might argue that we could also substitute "Love" for "Positive Hate". But this would be incorrect. Without a positive hatred of a particular human condition, Love, and Love alone is not enough. Anger begets Hate, and Hate is what motivates Love into action. The "Black Lives Matter" movement is a perfect, and most recent example.
Overall, the white American people are filled with Love for each other, but for nearly 100 years after the end of the Civil War, the African in America continued to suffer persecution. I am not suggesting that white Americans necessarily hated the African people. I feel the majority have simply been indifferent to a system of white supremacy. And here we arrive at the beating heart . The general "Love" of the American people for one another has not been enough to motivate the majority in a direction of positive change; a change that would empower the black community . The Civil Rights Act of 1964, in many respects , is only a paper tiger. We see that the KKK have used "Negative Hate" to infiltrate Police Departments across the United States, (as revealed in a 2006 FBI report) but the average white American does not harbor enough "Positive Hate" to create a movement like "White Lives Matter". And this is remarkable. Racism notwithstanding, statistics show that more innocent white Americans have been murdered by the police than any other race. Yet, the white Americans overall have not risen up in protest. But please, I will now reiterate this concept in other words:
An important purpose of the Love emotion is to prevent the rise of evil intentions; evil intentions that create a ripple effect of anger, negative hate, and misery in and around the Earth. But once negative hate has taken root and multiplied, the Love emotion has no power over it. Just as the swollen and infected tooth must often be pulled out of a mans head, we must cast out the evil that has descended upon us, and that seeks to lead us into a perpetual state war. We must lift the yoke of racist oppression that has seeded and cultivated hopelessness, and misery, throughout the nation. And the majority must reclaim the wealth and resources of this great continent; the great riches that are being hoarded and held captive by a rich and powerful minority. But as we have witnessed, this cannot be done entirely with the Love emotion, or "Positive Love". A man with a gun who is already filled with Negative Hate, will not hesitate to shoot you in the back, just as the world witnessed when Walter Scott was shot in the back as he was running the other way! And an evil cabal of men bent on world domination, will not hesitate to provoke another World War.
As a sexy man, I have reaped a bountiful harvest, and so I stand as a witness before God and man. Today I have praised God for my many blessings, and tomorrow I will wake up and praise God again. For it is only God who has taught me the true meaning of Love and Hate; of the application, and of the appropriate measure.
America has been brainwashed with hate in which is attempted murder. Hate is a crime like murder, you can convince American people it is OK to kill a million children and support the troops for doing it. Hate and murder is why America will get their karma return to themselve three fold as ground zero for war to come very soon
If there is such a thing as karma I'll take my fair share. As long as everyone involved gets theirs. Those who lie for effect, also.
News Flash: You are not a sexy man and everybody knows it. Furthermore, you have not been inspired by God. You are just being Ronnie, the crazy guy. But I give you credit for marketing. You've got people talking about anarchy, your all-time favorite subject. That's something...
I'm going to be honest with you. When it appeared he was serious he was just a crazy guy. Once it became obvious this was a giant joke, his comments in other threads lost their edge and he became more interesting. There is something attractive about someone who can run with something like this and convince people he is serious.
I'm still not convinced that this is a giant joke. I've been told that people like him really do exist.
Either way, I give him credit for being entertaining, unintentionally or not.
It is very strange when others seem to believe that they have the authority to decide whether or not I am sexy, and whether or not I am inspired by God. I would love to know the source of this information. I have made no such grand proclamations concerning others, as I understand that such proclamations are worthless and serves no real purpose.
What is sexy, and what is not sexy comes down to a matter of personal preference. I am a sexy man because I have chosen to be. And there are many women who like this kind of sexy man. Did you not know that there are approx. 320 million people in the United States? And did you not know that there are approx. 160 million females! Even if all 160 million females believed that Ronnie wrenchBiscuit was the sexiest man alive, what would I stand to gain?
Here are calculations based on a certain number of sexual partners per year (S.P.P.Y.) over the period of 60 years, from age 20 to 80 years:
A. 1 different sexual partner a day for 60 years= 21,900 Lifetime Total Sexual Partners
B. 3 different sexual partners a day for 60 years= 65,700 L.T.S.P.
C. 3 different sexual partners annually for 60 years= 180 L.T.S.P.
D. 1 different sexual partner per month for 60 years= 720 L.T.S.P..
it is obvious that "C" and "D" are the most realistic choices for men seeking a high level of sexual activity. And so, what we learn from this exercise is that the average male who wants a variety of sexual partners, really only needs to appeal to approx. 200 to 700 women throughout their entire lifetime! This is great news for young philanderers, sex addicts, Bill Clinton, or married men living on the down-low. This really puts things into perspective, and I am sure that even Jim Morrison, a very sexy man who has now been dead for almost 50 years, could get up, strike a pose, and still be sexy to at least 200 women!
Because my delivery, or my experiences do not fit within the parameters of the current social paradigm, it appears that some feel I have a problem to overcome. This is quite remarkable, since I clearly, and at length, explained how I overcame the problem when I was still in high school. Sexy is a state of mind, and it is humorous that anyone would suggest I am "pretending". But there are many in this world who seek to deceive us, and make us feel that we need their approval before we can attain any level of self-confidence, perfection, or success.
For instance: Older women are led to believe that they must get a face lift in order to be sexy. DON'T BELIEVE IT! This is a terrible lie, and a very expensive con. Please, I am speaking to all women over the age of 50. Remember who you are! You are not a teenage girl. You are a senior citizen, and it is only natural for your hair to turn gray, and your skin to wrinkle. This is God's plan. Forget about the opportunists who seek to exploit your fear of growing old, as they do not have the inside dope on sexy. I know what sexy is, because I am a sexy man. When I was only 17 years old, I had a 55 year old girl friend in San Diego. And of course, she looked like a 55 year old woman. She was a Romanian Gypsy, full figured with ample bosom, and very wide hips. She was very sexy, and I am not exaggerating when I say "... and over the course of a few short weeks, she was the love of my life ..." I was very young and emotional, and when our relationship ended, I sat at the bus stop .. . I hung down my head, and just like in the song "Tom Dooley" ... I began to cry . She used me all up, and then I was discarded like an empty box of Russel Stover's Assorted Chocolate Candies.Those were dark days for the sexy man. I did not want the young Barbie Doll. I wanted that older woman with all of her imperfections, as these made her even more appealing. Yes, I have always liked the older women. Older women who look like older women are sexy!
Another big con, is the sale of Feminine Hygiene Sprays. Many women have been deceived into thinking that the natural scent of a woman is unappealing, but this is just another lie that has been concocted to exploit women and make large green. Ironically, for a normal man, the absence of this feminine odor reduces the sex drive. In fact, I have been with women who were so "unnatural" due to the use of Feminine Hygiene Spray, that I had to call the whole thing off. Make no mistake about it, Feminine Hygiene Sprays are a perversion of nature. Yes, I have known men who do not like the scent of a woman, but I have also known men who like to abuse women as well. And I can tell you, they are all freaks of nature. Women who smell like women are sexy.
We can all be sexy if we want to be, and if we move in a sexy direction. Being sexy is a state of mind. No one can truly say that I am not sexy. I am the one who is living my life, and I am the one who has been admired by sexy women across the United States, and throughout the Pacific Regions. In fact, a sexy woman asked me today if I would write a song for her. And since that's what I do, I believe that I will. But I know what she really wants, and if she is lucky, and if I am so inclined , trust and believe ... I will deliver.
This is a great teaching, because women across the United States will collectively save millions of dollars, while improving their sex lives. No cash or credit card required. All that is required, is just a little bit of faith ... in a very sexy man.
The average person has 10 sexual partners in their lifetime. Don't you think your numners are too duty.
You lost me at positive hate.
The numbers are only there to make a point. I did not provide the numbers for them to be taken literally.And so I have demonstrated that any man can be sexy and have lots of girl friends. 200 girlfriends is all that he would need for a lifetime, and if he was really a hard core womanizer like Bill Clinton, he should clearly be satisfied with 700. When we look at 200 or even 700 out of a pool of 160 million females, we can understand that it should not be so difficult for any man to find at least 200 females in the whole United States that would consider him to be sexy. And with online dating, if a man so chooses, he could cover the entire waterfront. Every one can be sexy. People need to boost their self-esteem and know that they are sexy. When people feel sexy, and can release their sexual tension, the world becomes a much better, and a much safer place.
But there are too many uptight people who want to make up stupid rules.In fact, they are addicted to rules. And the media has made up ridiculous rules of fashion and beauty that have caused millions of men and women to feel less than zero. All for the sake of making money, to the detriment of mankind. Many men who feel that they are not sexy, become easy targets for online pornography, and the sexy chat rooms. Over a period of time, some of these men spend thousands of dollars for a perverse form of pleasure, and even become addicted to it. But it is a great tragedy, for I believe that most of them could have a real sexy life like mine.
Many men are afraid of women because they fear rejection. But they must come to realize that "no" simply means no! No is not the end of the world. Look at all of the people who ridicule me online. I could care less. They are not paying my bills, or doing sexy things to make me smile! They are like flies from a dung heap that land on your baked beams and potato salad when you are trying to have a picnic. I believe that this is the key to becoming a sexy man. A man must reach the point when no opinion matters but his own. And this must be his mantra," The World Does Not Revolve Around Me!". This is very important. When we truly understand this one simple idea, it can change our life. For example, if you go to a bar and try to score with 5 different women, they may all turn you down. In this case, the timid man will take it to heart. It is here that he will give up the fight, as he has now been rejected 5 times in a row. But this is not the way of the sexy man. The sexy man is like the little skunk on the Bugs Bunny show who never gives up.
The sexy man realizes that 2 of the women may be lesbians, one of the women may have a real bad headache because she ate the wrong food, one of them may have just found out she is pregnant without a clue, and two of them could be married, waiting for their boyfriends to arrive. In other words the sexy man knows"The World Does Not Revolve Around Me!" And so, understanding the various possibilities, he takes the rejection in stride. Furthermore, the sexy man understands that he is only looking for "one woman". If it takes him 8 hours, and if he is rejected 25 times, when number 26 says "yes", the little bell rings, door number one opens, and soon thereafter, his greatest desire shall be fulfilled.
wow some ppl think *i* take trolling to far. i tip my hat to you ranch biscuts.
This is the most ridiculous thing you've said, to date, Ronnie. I asked a question about online dating which anyone can verify under Hot Questions and this is what you said:
"Yes, dating has never been my forte. I have never been comfortable with being manipulated, by man or nature. I'm not interested in being a sex object, a piggy bank, or a fair-weather friend. Anyone over the age of 40 should get over the hump"
And you said this:
"Of course,during the last 100 years, if this monolithic, moronic mass of humanity had been seriously schooled in social interaction: dating, and mating, from K through 12, we might now be looking at the light at the end of the tunnel. Instead, we are staring down the darkness of materialism, and ultimately the extinction of the entire human race."
"I'd say it's going real well for Jake. He's not wasting his time and money on women who have nothing to offer but an expensive headache."
So everyone here, spare yourself. Ronnie hates dating and he thinks women are users. With that attitude, he has zero sex-life. Not sure why he posted this claim that women flock to him. It's anyone's guess. But at least this time around, he is telling people to respect women. He is right about that. But given what he said before....well, you can come to your own conclusions.
http://hubpages.com/relationships/answe … ine-dating
Lol, yeah I saw that. To be fair to him, it might be possible to avoid dating and still have a good sex life. And given his anecdotes it's less that he's dating and more that women are throwing themselves at him.
Still ridiculous, but at least not blatantly contradictory.
Something tells me that women are not throwing themselves at him.
Some women can throw themselves at ugly musicians. Yet not like movie stars.
… strange, isn't it? Once, in an interview, Barbara Walters told Tom Hanks to his face that he was not sexy! I think this hurt his feelings. He did not seem pleased. I think sexyness has to do with the solar plexus and the energy that emanates/flows from the depth and center of one's body. A good reason not to overeat / over-fill the stomach. Americans might proclaim outwardly that they do not want to be sexy or appear as such, but of course they do, inwardly.
(Musicians do exude androgynous qualities as a matter of balance.)
It is quite remarkable how the naysayers will always look for the smoking gun! I am of the superior intellect; not only because I proclaim it, but because my strong and sexy words have demonstrated this to the world, over and over again. And so, I have been challenged once again. My accuser seeks to reveal a contradiction. But this is not the first time I have been confronted, and challenged by a beautiful woman.
As you can see above, she has listed comments I have made as contradictions. Here is one of them:
"Yes, dating has never been my forte. I have never been comfortable with being manipulated, by man or nature. I'm not interested in being a sex object, a piggy bank, or a fair-weather friend. Anyone over the age of 40 should get over the hump"
Please, where is the smoking gun? A short statement such as this is only a placeholder for an experience, or an idea, and it serves as nothing more than a "label". But often in daily human discourse, we do not have the time, or the motivation to give a detailed account of our emotions, our experience, or our opinions. There is a lifetime of experience behind my brief commentary. But now, I have delivered a detailed account. Let the world marvel at this great teaching:
First I will lay the foundation, and then I will explode the fiction of these alleged contradictions.
A Superior Foundation
Mentally, the American commonly operates in a confined space, which can be likened to a cage. Parameters, or rules, are defined by an authority, and the citizen is expected to operate within those parameters. For instance, as we have seen here in this thread, I have been ridiculed by many for exercising my free speech. Here, I have sought to slander no one, but to only reveal the truth, and to make the world a sexier place. I am not asking for money, nor fame, nor adulation. I do not require the superficial satisfaction of being recognized for my superior intellect, or my very sexy ways. I am proud of what God has given me: I am good looking, I am intelligent, and many years ago, I was also blessed with the gift of sound an vision.
I have heard many proclamations concerning freedom of speech here in the United States. But in practice, this is not the kind of freedom that exists in a truly civilized society. Yes, as a rule, you can speak your mind here in America. But many citizens are gently persuaded not to do so. They witness how those like me are ridiculed for expressing our unconventional ideas, and they feel intimidated. Though some may possess a superior intellect, many do not have the strength to sustain a stream of negativity. As a result, many will remain silent. But please, the whole of humanity suffers when talented people are intimated; talented people who might otherwise provide valuable insight, and contributions to society. But I am a rock, and I stand steadfast in my convictions.
Now that I have laid the foundation, I will proceed to explode a terrible fiction:
On The Banks of the Wabash River
Dating here in America is a mating ritual that is expected to be performed within certain parameters. As such, conventional dating as is commonly practiced has never been my forte. But that is not because I originally desired it to be this way. I am in the Earth, and I am moved and shaped by the Earth, as the tides are moved by the force of the moon, and the sandy beaches are shaped by the rolling tides.
I grew up in a racist society. There were hardly any native people where I grew up. And so, I did not have the luxury of mainstream acceptance. In other words, most parents were not accepting of a mixed-race child (Aniyunwiya/German) dating their daughter. Because my skin is dark, and my cheek bones are high, the white racist mind did not recognize my German heritage. And although I found the young African girls to be quite attractive, they were not accessible, as I lived in the country, and so I was surrounded by white people.
Under such circumstances, when I became a teenager, I was unable to "date" in the traditional manner. Yes, many of the little girls wanted to be with me. Of course they did! I was very smart and very sexy, even at the age of 14, but their parents would not have approved. They would have been ashamed, and disgraced, had their daughters carried on with me in public. To the racist I was not a human being. In their twisted minds, I was a half-breed, and something far less than human. But this did not affect my self-esteem as one might expect.
My parents, who were active in the Civil Rights movement, were well aware of what I was up against, and so they spent a considerable amount of time teaching me at home. By the age of puberty, I had already read "A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies" by Bartolome de las Casas, and the essay "A Plea for Captain John Brown" by Henry David Thoreau, along with many other works. I was also expected to discuss what I had read with my parents, and to express my opinions. And although my parents would help to explain things that I was too young to grasp, they never tried to force me into a box. Instead, they encouraged critical thinking, and allowed me to develop my own ideas.
By the age of 14, I clearly understood the options afforded by this evil society; the evil racism I had been forced to sustain. I could cower like a whimpering dog, and develop a fondness for self-gratification, or I could be sexy, fulfill my ever growing desire, and declare war on my oppressors! Of course, I chose the three latter options.
I would secretly rendezvous with my little girlfriends. Sometimes, we would take a sleeping bag and explore the wonders of life in dark, and secret places: wooded areas, deserted park pavilions, and on the banks of the Wabash River. It was not possible for us to be seen together in public: to go to a movie, to go strolling through the park, or to hang out at the public square.
And so, this was not dating within the prescribed, and accepted parameters. In fact, it was not dating at all. It was wild and passionate; a revolution; it was primeval, and it was filled with excitement and danger. If I would have been caught, I could have been beaten very badly by an angry racist, or even killed. Such things were not unusual.
But I was "The Gangster of Love", and I had declared war on the evil forces that sought to deny my rite of passage. And so, even though there was a lingering bitterness, in the final analysis, it was I who prevailed. I fulfilled my desire while making a mockery of those who sought to tower above me, only to land squarely beneath my feet. Let all praises be to God; he who hath created me, and he who hath suffered for me to explore the many wonders of this magnificent creation.
Dating As An Adult
My adult life was greatly influenced by these events. And so, only for a brief while, during my early twenties, did I "date" women in the traditional sense. Since that time, my interaction with women has always been based on my own terms, or on creative terms mutually agreed upon; not the conditions or parameters predicated on customs and beliefs that pervert the natural order. And just as I stated, I do not allow myself to be manipulated by customs, or my own libido. I do not chase after women as a rutting stag, or as a dog in heat. I am of a superior intellect. When I speak of being sexy, and a master of seduction, many falsely assume that I am simply referring to sexual intercourse. But reducing the male/female interaction to such a base level blinds us to the much broader scope of human sexuality. I have enjoyed long lasting and meaningful relationships without ever having sexual intercourse. I am no cheap imitation ... I am the Real McCoy ... Truly, I "am" The Gangster of Love, and I get about my business.
A man cannot master such a fine Art by painting with a broad brush, because all women are not the same. And so, a man must take time to know and "learn" the woman. Only then can he truly fulfill her particular need; whether that need is of a sexual nature or not. And so as I have previously commented, I do not want to be treated as a sex object; a sex toy used simply for sexual gratification, nor do I commonly treat women in such a way.
As I have indicted, when I was a child I initially focused on sexual intercourse with the female. But this was only because of my naivete, my expanding libido, and the social pressures I was forced to endure. But we all have a place to begin, and from that beginning, we begin to move forward into a deeper understanding of human sexuality. Yes, as an adult, there have been instances where a woman has either forced herself upon me, or has requested a sexy one night stand. But such encounters have become fewer and far between, as God has continued to elevate my condition. These days, I do not go seeking these exciting, yet superficial sexual encounters. And so, just as I suggested in my previous commentary. Since the age of 40, I have gotten over the "hump", and moved on to bigger and better things.
I believe that people must be educated about sexuality from an early age. Not the kind of education that comes out of a box, but by those who not only have the technical knowledge, but also the sexual experience; a real world understanding of the physical and mental aspects of human sexuality. Furthermore, I am offended by women who have reduced human sexuality to a matter of dollars and cents. Yes, years ago, women were not allowed to work, but in the most menial occupations, and they were sorely discriminated against. For many, it was only through marriage that they could realize comfort and security. But today, overall, this is no longer true.
A woman addicted to materialism will seek out a man based on his income, even when she has a comfortable income of her own, and this is nothing but greed. For instance, years ago I perused an online "Christian" dating site. I was troubled, but not surprised at what I found. In their profiles, many of these so-called Christian women were actually posting the income bracket they were looking for. For example: " ... and I am seeking a man who makes $50,000+ annually..." etc.. This is an outrage! To say the least. Ironically, we can rest assured that none of these good Christian women would have ever considered dating Jesus. Jesus was an unemployed carpenter; a man who had to borrow a donkey in order to ride through Jerusalem! This is just another prime example of why I have a strong distaste for hypocrites; those who spend their entire life pretending Jesus, as if no one can see through their unholy facade.
Finally, as I have now revealed, the whole world can see that there are no contradictions in my previous commentary. A fiction was created to render a false narrative about my character. Of course, before claiming that I was a hypocrite and a liar, my accuser could have politely asked for a further explanation before responding in such a derogatory fashion. But let us be of good cheer! I was born on this continent.I was raised in an imaginary state that lies within the imaginary borders of the United States. Thus, I am not sorely offended, nor am I surprised. I am a sexy man, and I will continue to be so until the day I die ... and after that, I will simply start all over again. Osiyo!
A Sexy Man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGt5UCl-rB8
but I have a question: In what way is p r o v i d i n g "overly-familiar"?
Of course, a man can provide for a woman from a distance, but as a rule, people who are married,or involved in long-term relationships, live together 24/7 + 365. The provider of material things can be sexy in the beginning of a sexual relationship. But it is impossible to escape the old ennui of married life, or a constant, 24/7 companionship.
I feel that the best thing in life for any individual is to first understand who you are, and then to set about perfecting that image of yourself. Any man or woman seeking a long-term relationship must understand and accept the Law of Gravity. The Law of Gravity is neutral, as it is neither positive or negative; good or evil. It is simply a natural law written into the fabric of time by God. If all is well, a man's love for a woman can only continue to grow, while his lust, or sexual desire can only continue to fade. Perhaps it may be different for a woman. And this I cannot be sure of, but I suspect it may be the same eventually.
But a woman will always welcome the sexy man, as she will hate him for leaving, but always welcome his return. But there is a price for everything, and nothing is free. The provider of material things will often die surrounded by his family and friends, whereas the sexy man will often die alone, with no one to shed a single tear. Pick your poison.
Lol. Does he "win" because he lies better than the average Joe, not unlike certain politicians who change their story to suit the changing worldview of their constituents, even if they have a history of corruption? Ronnie is playing you and everybody here, with the exception of Oztinato, and one other, who can sense a lie from the get-go.
We have in Ronnie, a man who posts pictures of scantily clad women (which is not sexy) as well as pictures of dead people (also not sexy, but which is instead, quite sick and horrifying.)
Ronnie is troubled, to say the least. Sexy people do not say they are sexy or "Master's of Seduction." Not do they express their contempt for women on one post and then do an about face on another post. Ronnie is the last person anyone should take some advice from on the subject of sexiness since he is not sexy. Creepiness is not sexy. Seriously, Ronnie's sex diatribe has gone from being somewhat funny to being weird and rather alarming. One cannot get honest answers from someone who contradicts himself at every turn.
It is not enough for you to censor and moderate your own threads. Now you come over here and attempt to censor and moderate mine. LOL! Good luck with that.
Matthew Brady was the man who captured these images for the world to see. There was a good reason behind it. It is the same reason that we were shown images of dead people killed in MVC's during drivers education. The idea is to "prevent" needless death and suffering, by reminding us of the consequences of reckless behavior. I, and many other sexy people, have been talking about the evils of this society for many years. I have been doing this on Hubpages for 3 years.
Our purpose is to raise awareness, to stop the killing, and to put an end to this madness. People need to be reminded daily, that if changes are not made, the dead bodies in those pictures will soon belong to someone that they love, or perhaps even themselves. If the people of the United States would have listened to people like me 20 years ago, there would be no proxy war in Syria today. If they would have listened three years ago, 9 black church members wouldn't be dead in North Carolina, and 5 cops wouldn't be dead in Dallas. Evil begets evil, and as long as it continues to grow, the pain and the suffering will also continue. If you truly believe that your Political Correctness can save us from a nuclear winter, please proceed. I would love to examine such a beautiful mind.
I am flattered that you seek my attention. But apparently, you do not understand how to attract the sexy man. If you want a sexy man to notice you, this is not the way. Yes, I have noticed you, but the feelings you have inspired are not sexy feelings. Of course, it is true that you must engage the man, but at the same time, you must be careful not to offend so very much that he will push you away! My sexiness is a gift from God, and so it is wrong for me not to share this wonderful gift. But I cannot share my gift with someone who is screaming for my attention, while at the same time beating me relentlessly over the head with verbal abuse. Please, I would suggest a more subtle approach.
I wonder what I would do with so much time on my hands.
When I date women in South America.
It seem I need a crowbar to separate them from their family in order to have sex. Any tips on how to get my senorita alone from her family?
pobrecitas son putas so just through a bunch of pesos at them and give them a couple of chickens. if you switch to muchachos you can save a little money. they all look the same from behind.
Your comments are not clever, and they would perhaps be humorous to a male adolescent, but I find them to be very disrespectful. This is why you will never have a happy sex life. I would guess that someone has sorely mistreated you, abandoned you, or made you the subject of ridicule.
But you do not have to continue in this way. Everywhere I go, women want to be near me. Although our intentions in this physical life cannot commonly be seen with the naked eye, an alert female can "feel" or sense our intentions from a mile away. In effect, you are pushing them away from you with your intentions, and lack of respect. Even a prostitute is deserving of respect, as she is providing you with pleasure, at an agreed upon price. Even a prostitute is the image of God. And when you disrespect and defile the image of God, you defile yourself.
nah dude i don't think so. its super lame to brag about banging those nasty pobrecitas anyway i'd rather get a nice firstworld woman who doesn't look at me like an atm and isn't on a strick regiment of antibiotics antivirals and antiitchy cremes if you no what i mean wink wink . gimme a sweet pennsylvania amish farm girl over a colombian puta bangkok hoar any day of the week
You seem to misunderstand, I have had a wonderful sex life for many years. I am sharing my knowledge to help, to encourage, and to enrich the lives of my brothers and sisters who follow in steps I have left behind. It is simply my responsibility to do so. I know, just as you know, that you do not have a happy and active sex life. I am showing you how to change things for the better. Your disrespect of women, and your refusal to accept the truth that I have delivered, will not have a negative impact on my sex life whatsoever, but only on yours. In this moment , your defiance invigorates you. But tonight, when you are all alone, it will only be a question of the right or the left.
Oh man, Will,
Maybe you hang out too much on the street corners. Is a woman a life support system for a pussy?
First of all, in order to have a happy sex life your primary goal must not be sexual intercourse. This is why the families are being so difficult. They do not want their daughters being treated as prostitutes and whores. Your intentions appear to them as disrespectful. And based on your language, I believe they are correct. You must first respect the woman, and then she will give you everything, and all that you desire. This is the great secret that has created many wonderful memories that I will cherish, even unto the next life. You must look first for the beauty of a womans soul. If this does not suit you, then I suggest finding a real prostitute.
Then perhaps you are torn between two worlds: the past and the present. If this is the case then you must understand that the past is not static and immovable as many have led us to believe. We can still shape the past, just as we can shape the future, as time is cyclical, and does not move in a straight line. All of these events that you are remembering are perpetual, and still occurring. We have been taught that we can only affect the future, but that is a great misconception. And it is just one of the many lies and deceptions that was been imported and perpetuated by the European Colonizers.
Yes ,we can only affect the present, but by doing so we help to bring the time-line into balance: that which lies in both directions. Because of the cyclical nature of time and experience, the sexual maturity that you achieve in this lifetime will ultimately manifest itself back into the past, or that point along the time-line that you perceive as being "behind you", and untouchable. You will ultimately experience the same events all over again, but hopefully with a better understanding of how to navigate through the minefield of adolescence. This will bring about a better outcome, which will continue to have a ripple effect until you are released from the wheel and absorbed into the collective soul.
I ask a silly? I get a silly answer like from will.
I married an Aztec that did not turn out well, yet my daughter is the love of my life.
Women and and the Sun I worship most in life and attracted more to brown women and their cultures more than my own white tribe.
The real ? Is I'm moving to Bolivia where sex before marriage is illegal. Even if I do marry' I would want to try before I commit an intentional lifetime of marriage.
Or is it like Marijanna where half of the people have tried it, regardless it's illegal.
When I was a very small child, it seemed silly to me that my Father would argue with other men over the price of various commodities. It was quite boring as well. And until I seriously studied American History, I was embarrassed, and also thought it was silly when native people would publicly refer to the Colonizers as rapists, murderers, and thieves. But that was before I studied, and learned of this evil system, and the legacy of colonialism. And it was well before I understood the cyclical nature of time.
As far as moving to Bolivia. I was not aware of this law. If it is true, then I would suggest that you should choose not to go if you have a choice. Otherwise I would be of good cheer, as a man can survive without an active sex life. And it may be good for you, as it will force you to explore the deeper aspects of the woman that you desire. The anticipation, and the sexual tension will continue to build throughout your courtship. By the time you are married you will be as a raging bull. You will experience a volcanic eruption of carnal delight that will leave you breathless and broken, like a porcelain doll that has been tossed to the pavement from a vehicle moving at a high rate of speed.
It always baffles me when men say they respect women. Especially the way they are today. They are increasingly self-oriented, demanding of freedom, refusing to cater, refusing to cook and clean, refusing to self-sacrifice anything on any level and spurning any sort of subordinate position. I mean what's in it for men these days ... REALLY?
( And, on top of all that, women today are totally fine with dropping off their babies at Daycare from day one / month three.)
Go ahead and try to improve MY sex life , would ya wB
Of course, as you know, I find you to be a very attractive woman. And so, if I were living in that part of the world, I would gladly attend to your needs, should you be so inclined. But since I am here, and you are there, I will try to help as best I can.
Some of this is quite easy to do. First you need to honestly look at what you are dealing with. It appears that you already realize that a great majority of men "do not" respect women. Yes a woman wants to have a hot and heavy sex life, just like a man, but she does not want to be treated merely as a sex object, as if that is the sum total of her worth. But as you know, it is difficult to find a man who will truly respect you. Here is my plan for you Katherine:
I want you to take a journey. I am going to show you how to pray in a particular way that may seem very strange. This will not cost you any money, although it will require time and effort. Prayer is not simply a matter of speaking (thinking) to God, and then waiting for the results. God is real. We cannot escape God. Many say that God does not exist, but when a man is standing next to a sexy woman and he receives an erection, at that very moment, he can see and feel a clear manifestation of God.
Prayer involves mental visualization as well as action. What does this mean?
It means that I want you to pray for a sexy man to come into your life, but I do not want you to necessarily look for this sexy man. Yes, God will send you a sexy man, but if you are out there looking; when your prayers are answered; when that sexy man of your dreams arrives, you will not be home!
It means that I want you to go to various dating sites on the web. I want you to look at the pictures and read the various profiles. Treat this as you would study for a college exam, and take notes. Do this at your leisure over a period of days, or even weeks. This will enable you to better visualize the physical and mental characteristics that you find most appealing. Once you feel that you have created a good composite of all that you have seen, then I want you to visualize this composite throughout the day whenever time permits, and as you visualize this beautiful man that you have created, do not just ask God to send him to you. You must be forceful and demand it!
This may seem like a disrespectful thing to do, but it is not. God is not a man. Man is a creature created by God. And being a creation is not unlike being a pet. When the little dog barks and demands his treats, or because he needs to be let out into the backyard, we may be annoyed at times if we are busy, but we are never offended. We love the little dog, and his boldness only further endears him to us. Demand your happiness. Tell God what you want. Tell God what you need. Show God the vision that you must realize and make manifest in the flesh. Let your faith be strong, and with all of your heart believe it to be true. And if you do these things, I am confident that this man will eventually present himself to you, and you will share many happy moments. This is what you deserve, and if it were not so, you would not have been made into a woman. You would be a rock, or a tall tree overlooking the Pacific Ocean.
I believe in the Power of Prayer. I have seen prayer work in all aspects of my life, and belief is the key to the city.
Yes, as Jesus said, the harvest is abundant but the workers are few.
Luckily, for all men, I do not like sex.
However, I thank you for your compliment and appreciate your effort to help me!
PS That was a very happy life time: being a " tall tree overlooking the Pacific Ocean."
Not liking sex would limit your choices because most men like sex.
Oh yeah! Remember that football game the other day.
women like love more than sex. That alone limits the choices.
The human mind is in a constant state of flux. And so I reveal yet another secret of the sexy man. By understanding this, we can master the art of seduction. A woman does not always want the same thing. When I joined the military, my recruiter told me something about women that I will never forget. Of course, because of the evil people who seek to censor the sexy man, I must change a particular noun commonly used to describe those who participate in the world's oldest profession. This edit will add a "kinder and gentler" sheen to his original remark.
My recruiter told me concerning women:
" Respectable women want to be treated like the "women of the night", and the "women of the night" want to be treated as respectable women. You are a good looking young man, If you follow my advice, you will get most of what you want, and everything you need!"
Of course, I was initially offended by his statement, as it appeared to be very crude, and I was not accustomed to thinking in such terms. I was only 17 years old. But as I grew older, and through my travels around the world, I discovered that his assessment was close to the mark, if not right on the money. And I have tested this theory over and over again, with women of all races, and from all walks of life.
I remember a young nurse; a pretty woman that I dated briefly while I was playing in a very popular band in New York. The band was only popular because the women all thought that I was very sexy, and they wanted to be with me. We were young, and really didn't sound that great. I was interested in having a relationship with the young nurse. And so, on the first date, I focused on conversation, and tried to be respectful. At the end of the date, when we arrived at her apartment, I did not ask to go in, as I did not want to seem too eager. Remember, I was hoping for a relationship. But before she got out of the car, she told me she did not want to see me anymore! When I asked why, she quickly explained that she found my behavior to be insulting, because I had not tried to touch her, or ask to go inside. And I will never forget her last words, as she slammed the door and ran to her apartment. She said: "What have I got, some kind of F------ contagious disease?"
I have to admit, I was dumbfounded, and it is terrible I know, but I laughed to myself all of the way home. Because I remembered my old recruiter, and those words of wisdom; words he had spoken so many years before,that had once again rang true. In other words, the sexy man not only has to "learn" the woman as I have already stated, but he must also understand that she is always changing, and the sexy man must be able to roll with the changes. This young woman had presented herself to me as very soft spoken, polite, and "proper". By today's standards she would have been considered very politically correct. And so, I had attempted to treat her according to the image she had presented. However,as it turned out, she was only looking for sex. When I did not seem interested , it apparently bruised her ego.
And when I think of rolling with the changes, I am reminded of the old Creedence Clearwater Revival song "Proud Mary". Many people do not realize that the chorus is actually a sexual metaphor:
When a man and a woman are engaged in sexual activity, they are collectively like a river boat going up the Ohio River. The woman is the boat connected to the smoke stack, as within her is a raging fire, and the man is the wheel that goes around and around in a vigorous motion; pushing the boat further and further up the river of sexy love.
"...Big wheel keep on turnin'
Proud Mary keep on burnin'
Rollin', rollin', rollin' on the river..."
I have encountered this before, but it is something I cannot understand, as I have always been very sexy. Even when I was 6 years old, I was sexually attracted to my sisters teenage girlfriends, as well as my teachers. But because I was very shy, it wasn't until I was 14 that I actually had the nerve to move in that direction.
it must be true if you say it on the innernet! we are so lucky to be grased by the presents of a sexy 6 year old sheezus christ.
I can relate to anger on other levels, but I have never experienced your particular problem. Yes, females have always been attracted to me. And I am thankful, because I love being around them. They are much prettier than men, they smell better, and as a rule they are not as arrogant and as stupid as men.
I maintain that you would be much happier if you would focus on getting to know females as opposed to seeing them as merely sex objects. Females are not aliens, or from another planet. In fact, all men are part female. How could they not be, since it was in the female body that we were all created. This puts the female closer to God than the male. This is one reason that many men hate women and mistreat them. In spite of their machismo, and their ability to violently control and oppress women, there is one thing the woman has that a man could never possess, and that is the power to create life.
You must accept that you are a man, and that you are subordinate to the female. To suggest that women should have equality with men may perhaps be well intentioned, but it is actually an insult. To suggest such a thing is no different than suggesting I should have equality with a dog, or a donkey. Why should women seek to be equal to that which in many respects is so far beneath them?
The hilarious thing is the OP claimed about a week ago, on another thread, that he had risen above the desire to 'copulate with human females'. I guess he's changed his mind.
Thats exactly what he meant!
When issued forth with love and respect, its all good.
I suppose I could attempt to enlighten, but since you apparently don't understand the definition of the word copulate involves sexual intercourse (which is the sex life the title refers to) I will assume the OP suffers from the same lack of understanding.
?? If he has risen above the need to copulate, that means he has no further interest in sex. Yet, in this thread, he is offering advice and claiming a healthy sex life.
Can't have it both ways. My money is on the OP not having it either way.
maybe he has risen above loveless sex. That is easier said than done.
Maybe. But, by definition of the word and the term he is now contradicting himself.
what do you think his point is in all of this?
He said: …" I am a master of the art of seduction and satisfaction. I understand what women want, and so I am ready to answer your questions , and provide valuable insight that will bring you much happiness in the years to come."
Seems pretty confident.
I used to tell the kids that almost everything is 50% swagger. But, that was just to help build their confidence so they would feel better during their learning curve. Swagger does not skill make. I've met plenty of people who were totally confident that they could do things reality proved they couldn't.
Plus, when it comes to sex, men believe themselves to be more than adequate. One would need verification from at least one woman to validate the claim. (in case the OP reads this, a woman we could verify was real)
Once again, it is apparent that you are using words and phrases as placeholders for your own preconceived notions. There are no contradictions here, as it is true that I have risen above the need to copulate with women. If you look at my introduction to this most enlightening thread, you will see:
"Many women find me sexually attractive and exciting. I have no explanation for this as I consider myself just an ordinary guy. But I am a master of the art of seduction and satisfaction. I understand what women want, and so I am ready to answer your questions , and provide valuable insight that will bring you much happiness in the years to come."
Where in this do you see a current "need" or a "desire" to copulate? I am a master of seduction and satisfaction. That does not necessarily mean that I am putting smiles on the faces of lonely women 24/7, or even once a year! It simply means that at some time in my life I have gained mastery over something. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
You would have to be a man to realize that by the age of 12, it becomes increasingly difficult not to think about sex. Sex is on your mind from sun up to sun down. And I know this is normal because I have grown up in this world, and many men I know have had a similar experience. Of course I am sure there are exceptions to the rule, but these are a great minority. This can be verified by the success and proliferation of pornography on the internet, as well as in the world of brick and mortar. It can also be verified by the worlds oldest profession. And the worlds oldest profession was preceeded by the worlds oldest pastime, which is masturbation.
After becoming a professional musician I literally became addicted to sex, because it was so readily available at every watering hole, yacht club, or Tiki Bar I played. One night I was playing at a little roadhouse in New York. I took a break and went to the mens room. It was a small one seater. As I was closing the door a woman pushed open the door and then locked it behind her. She then forced herself on me. I was in shock, but I found her aggressiveness to be quite appealing, and so I just went with the flow. But that was many years ago. And that's what I mean when I say I have risen above this. Today, I would not do such a foolhardy thing. It was a white woman in a redneck bar. What if she had been married, and her husband would have needed to use the mens's room? How do you think he would have felt about seeing "Tonto" coming out of a one seater with his wife, both dripping sweat? I assure you, I was all alone there in a sea of rednecks, I would have never lived to tell the tale.
Overall I want people to be happy. And it is important that we have a healthy sex life, and not go to extremes, whether it be total abstinence or an addiction to sex. Many people who totally abstain become freaks of nature, such as the many Catholic priests we have heard about. And many people who become addicted never have a meaningful relationship.
You stated, inthis thread have had a wonderful sex love your many years. .
So, you might want to work harder to remember the part you are attempting to play. And stay in character at least within the thread.
You don't even make sense. So what? Yes I have had a great sex life for many years, and now I have risen above the need and the desire to jump every woman that turns on the green light. I fail to see any smoking gun. Are you drinking?
I remember that. It was the comment where he proclaimed himself to be "more human than human."
If you can say anything about him, it's that he's modest. Threads like these exemplify that.
… well, he was shy when he was six!
Luckily, we all were!
At six, I fall in love.
Love a the pain when she kick me at school.
Yes, I had never seen so many girls in one place until my first day at school. I was very excited, and I fell in love, but was afraid to say it. That little girl became a woman, and she will die never knowing that the little boy who sat next to her, and who later became a very sexy man, was madly in love.
There is no virtue in false modesty. Muhammad Ali said he was the greatest, and in his day, he surely was. He also said he was "pretty", and anyone could see that he was a handsome man. There are too many liars, hypocrites, and PC people in the world today. Many people are also suffering from a low self-esteem. And this is no good for anyone. America has become the land of the sheeple, with very little originality. And many who have done great things are afraid to proclaim their own greatness for fear of ridicule. I am not such a coward. I have done great things in the world and I continue to do so. And I am proud that I did not become a monster in a uniform; a miscreant with a badge that goes around killing men, women, and children. I thank God I am not that person.
You readily mock and ridicule, but you have nothing good to say about yourself. And if you have done great things, why are you afraid to speak it? I have learned long ago the art of seduction. And for a young man, this is very important to know. And it is a phase of life that will come and go, never to come again. A young man must make the most of it, and so I did. I assure you, it has been a bountiful harvest, but now I am on a different path, as I am preparing to die. And just like the rest of my life. My death will be a glorious death. I will die looking out at the ocean, with the wind and the salty spray upon my face, while the sandpipers scurry along the sand and the pelicans mingle about near the docks. I assure you, I will die a very wealthy man.
There is no virtue in false modesty.
Good thing I didn't accuse you of false modesty then. If only you'd noticed that, you might have avoided going into another needless tangent.
If you are unaware of the distinction, Muhammad Ali could quite easily have been modest without being falsely so.
The reason few would hold his lack of modesty against him is because he made a good case for himself with his actions. His wins and records are readily apparent.
You, on the other hand, have a record of incoherence and contradiction.
You readily mock and ridicule
I'm only returning the favour.
but you have nothing good to say about yourself.
I don't? That's odd. I always thought I had great calves.
I'm sure you know what I do or do not have to say about myself better than I do. Especially when such questions have not been prompted.
And if you have done great things, why are you afraid to speak it?
again, accusing me of not doing something that hasn't been prompted.
But alright, let's talk about the great things I've done:
- I've had 5 girlfriends at the same time, when I was 6 months old
- I was always sexy, even as a zygote
- I am of a superior intellect, with an IQ of over 300
- I am more human than human than human than human than human than human
- I am a master of the art of seduction, capable of sexually attracting women, men, and animals alike
- I am a master of the art of satisfaction, sometimes accidentally killing people from orgasmic pleasure (their spirits later told me it was worth it)
- despite all of the above, I have no explanation for why women are attracted to me
- I am also an ordinary guy
You love semantics, and I must admit it is quite annoying. It's like a broken record that I have come to expect. And if you feel I have insulted you, then rest assured, I have no remorse whatsoever. If you want to be successful with women you must learn how to listen to what they have to say, and stop trying to critique every word and every syllable. And most of the time you are wrong anyway. For instance, you have made the ridiculous assumption that I know not the difference between modesty and false modesty. I cannot speak for Ali, but I am not a modest person. If I expressed modesty at all, it would be "false modesty". Thus, my comment, "There is no virtue in false modesty", was quite correct.
This is where you always fail. You miss what is real by trying to figure everything out in your own mind, when it's not happening there in the first place. It's happening out "here", and you are simply an observer. Your intentions,interpretations, and opinions are insignificant. If the tree falls it "will" make a sound , whether you are there to hear it or not. People often speak with humor or sarcasm. They don't always add the "LOL", or alert the reader that what they have just delivered is tongue in cheek. Another problem you need to address is originality. Everyone is born with a unique personality, but you persist in covering yourself in a generic grey lacquer.
A woman wants vibrant colors, and not colors painted with cheap watercolors, but colors painted with rich exotic oils. And along with those rich vibrant colors, a woman likes an element of danger. If you have never seen 9 and 1/2 Weeks then you really need to watch the movie. That movie explores the way of the sexy man. And it is all true. Sexuality can be approached in a practical or utilitarian manner, or it can be treated as an art form. I am an artist, and when I am making love to a woman , I am painting the picture, and writing the song, as if I am standing at the threshold between life and death, as if there is no past and no future , but only that one moment in time; that one moment when our identities merge into one complete and inseparable being; when the flesh gives way to the naked essence of the woman; and when the dust cradled and animated in the hand of God quivers beneath me and moans, I know that I have done God's work, and that I have done it ... oh! so well.
Of course I love semantics. Meaning is quite important in communication; as one user puts it, it is "indeed the one single matter that is of undeniably paramount importance." But perhaps you are accusing me of "playing semantics," where one utilizes a technicality to ignore the essence of a topic. So where have I played semantics? Did I dismiss racism if the act was only based on hatred or preference of a race, instead of a belief in superiority? Oh wait, that was you. Silly me.
But semantics are not what I am here for. What I actually love, Mr. Ordinary Guy who is also a Master of Sex and is More Human than Human, is pointing out your contradictions, of which you have a seemingly endless supply. I'm not insulted by you. I'm just entertained.
For instance, I did not assume you don't know the difference between modesty and false modesty. I said "if you are unaware of the distinction." The word "if" expresses uncertainty, or a possibility, and nothing more. In other words, it is more of a question than a statement of fact or opinion. The correct and educated response from you would have simply been: "No, I was not aware" or "Yes, I was aware". Sound familiar? The thing you falsely accused LtL of doing, of not understanding the English language, is the very same thing you ended up doing, in near-identical fashion.
Thank you for elucidating that any expressions of modesty from you will never be sincere. Prior to your clarification I could have assumed, for your benefit, that you are mostly egotistical and without merit, but still show some occasional hints of humility. Now I know better the extent of your humility, or lack thereof.
Of course, this is still neither here nor there. I will remind you, again, that I did not accuse you of false modesty. Let me spell out my accusation for you: you are egotistical and without merit. That separates you from someone like Muhammad Ali, who was egotistical but had merit.
Which is fine either way, really. I don't care that you are who you are. I just find it entertaining, especially because of the manner of your self-appraisal: unabashedly bragging about your unconfirmed sexual prowess while deluding yourself to think that you are helping your 'brothers and sisters' be successful with the opposite sex, in a slow-moving Hubpages forum of all places. Is your target demographic the dozen or so Hubbers who regularly frequent these forums, are largely married and/or retired, and have little to no interest in learning "the art of seduction and satisfaction"? Surreal.
Oh, and just to clarify for your sake, I am not interested in the art of seduction and satisfaction, nor am I interested in having success with women. But if I were interested, I would not seek Hubpages' threads for advice. And I would most certainly not seek advice from the likes of you.
By all means, carry on doing God's work. If by God's work you mean giving me a hearty chuckle.
Your vitriol is like the little snowflakes that collide and melt against a cold steel rail. But unlike iron and steel, I will never rust. You, like many others have been deceived by celebrity and materialism. There have been many great men and women who have walked this Earth; men and women whose names have been long forgotten, but whose works were magnificent and divine. Just yesterday I thought of Ida B. Wells. It appears that you and others think that this post is some kind of a joke, or just something nonsensical I have dreamed up because I am bored. But on the contrary, I am a very busy man. I am changing the world, and if I am lucky, with the help of many other talented people, I will save it for future generations.
I have many talents, and I have always been a magnet for women. Even women who do not like me have succumbed to my seduction. This is why I found the movie "Witches of Eastwick" to be such an enjoyable movie. The scene where Cher viciously insults Jack Nicholson, and then succumbs to his charms, is not just a Hollywood script. I have lived this scene many times over. And it is most rewarding to overcome her defiance,only to be welcomed into a raging inferno of feminine desire. It appears that you are timid, and not so aggressive with females . But be of good cheer. There are also females who prefer men who are less threatening, and who can more easily be dominated. It appears that you already have a fan! I see that she likes your personality on the monitor. If she likes your picture, then you may have found a love match on Hubpages. Looking at her profile picture, I see that she is very attractive, and so, this could go very well for you.
And this is what it's all about my friend! My methods and understanding of the human female, and human sexuality, have helped you to find a potential partner in Love. Let the world marvel at my great works! I am destroying a system of white supremacy, while at the same time teaching the people how to love one another, and how to get the satisfaction that they so richly deserve.
But I do not expect your gratitude, or any kind words from you. Just as in all publications, there are many perversions and falsehoods that have been included in the Christian Bible. In fact, it is a virtual minefield that only a superior intellect can safely traverse. Having that superior intellect, I have found many great truths in the teachings of Jesus. In Matthew 5:45 Jesus says: "... for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sendeth rain on the just and the unjust." And I am in agreement with this teaching. This is why I suffer the abuse of the ignorant and the angry, and bring them the light in spite of their evil words. For my greatest reward is not here among men, but my reward is in Heaven, where the Ghost Council awaits my glorious return.
have you noticed that the less you are able to argue a point, the more you go off on irrelevant tangents?
At times I find myself wondering if you're some elaborate character creation. Mostly I'm astonished that an oddity like yourself exists.
Either way, keep doing you, Don Juan. If nothing else, you are entertaining. Like a jester or a village idiot.
There are many astonishing things coming your way. And since I am a great entertainer I am not surprised that you are entertained. As I said, I have many talents. And now you have confirmed my greatness. There are a majority of people who are weak, and who do nothing but sit in their gated communities and commiserate about the problems of the world ... for at least 5 minutes. But I am not one of these.
Jealousy is a terrible thing. Many people are jealous of me because of my many talents, my good looks, and the fact that I have mastered the art of Love and seduction. They feel cheated that God has given me so much, while it appears God has given them so very little. But that is why I have come. The people have only been deceived into believing this terrible lie. The talents of many have been hidden away and covered up by false religious doctrines, stifling social norms, oppressive governments, and material pursuits. I am ready to answer all questions pertaining to this topic, as I am an authority, and I am ready to assist you.
"From each according to his ability,to each according to his need".
Here is a verse that I wrote about a man I once met in Wisconsin. There was nothing special about this man, and so he was very jealous of me, as I am a very sexy man, and women love to be near me.
Something About A Fool
Only a fool would go fishing with a cinder block. A man who is not seeking understanding, looking to improve his own life, or to share information that can be helpful to others, is like the rust that collects around the fence post.
"Something About A Fool" © 2016 wrenchBiscuit
LOL. That's the best post I've read on this site in weeks. Thanks for sharing.
On my.....WHAT A THREAD, what will one think of next.............Well, this is MUCH BETTER than some of the usual thread. HAVE AT IT!
This is such a .....FUN thread. Right up my alley........Why didn't I THINK OF THIS.......Well, at least I'M IN.....
Count me in too. About time........
DELIGHTFUL, this is so DELICIOUS............
NO, This HAS got to STOP......& NOW.........
It is COMMANDED that THIS stops......You all are on the road to.....PERDITION......You have been warned.
We concur. Stop this.......this is pure licentiousness.............
Oh man, ROCK it baby, rock it anyway you can.........The world would be better if people made love instead of war. ROCK IT!
IGNITE one's passion............Life is TOO SHORT not to...........
The image of Mark Wahlberg reminds of my own physique, except that my complexion is slightly darker, and more appealing to the average woman. I can tell from your post that you have a healthy attitude about sexuality. And I suspect that you also have a vibrant sex life, but if not, at least you are comfortable with your lifestyle. And that is what I have found lacking in many people's lives. They are not content with their lifestyle. For instance, a married woman can be very dangerous. Many of these women have married men with money, position, and power, but who are sorely lacking when it comes to fulfilling the needs of a mature and fully functional female.
Such women stalk sexy men like myself, and can easily deliver us to ruin. Although it can be very exciting, I would not recommend dating a married woman for any reason. If a man and a woman are that attracted to each other, then the man should wait, not until the woman is separated, but until she is legally divorced. Even during a period of separation, men can become like wild animals, barking and foaming at the mouth. They cannot stand the thought of their wife enjoying the intimate caress of another man. It drives them crazy, and this puts the sexy man at a very great risk. Especially if the sexy man is of a different race than the husband.
There are millions of single women who are looking for Love. A majority of these would be more than happy to have have a man like me, as I would never take their affections for granted. However, I am only one man. And how can one man Love so many? Furthermore, I am currently on hiatus from any sexual activities. Although sex can be invigorating, it also reduces our motivation in other areas. I have experimented and found this to be true, at least in my own life. And now I will reveal a great secret I have known for many years: Sexual tension can be used to enhance creativity. If you are an artist, such as a painter, musician, songwriter etc., the sexual tension can help you to focus on your creations, as it seems to act as some form of catalyst. In my own experience, the moment I begin satisfying a woman with regular sexual activity, my motivation to create is diminished.
And so, even though many may think that the grass is always greener on the other side. As a sexy man I can tell you: It is not so easy ... being a sexy man.
I agree. Such a person also fits the definition of a TROLL. He did not come to this thread seeking assistance about matters of sexuality. Nor did he come to share any experiences of great conquest or failure. He came for the sole purpose of demeaning my character, and making a mockery of my purpose. And that is the way of a TROLL.
But this is the way of many Americans. The Taino people met Columbus at the shoreline with gifts, welcoming him to the New World. But he returned their hospitality by enslaving them, raping their wives and daughters, and stealing all that they possessed. The words in the image I added here are from the journal of Columbus.
I've already had a "great conquest" in this very thread, thanks to my great calves. That's more than you've done, Casanova.
Oh, and mockery is not equivalent to trolling. What is that now? 0 for 5 on definitions and word meaning?
I agree, women are more often over worked and under appreciated. Maybe WB has a tip or two.
"Why should women seek to be equal to that which in many respects is so far beneath them?"
We are equal on a soul level. It is best to remember that.
I have my doubts. How many women do you know that go out in woods on the weekend, in the dead of winter, to kill little furry animals, simply for the "sport" of it? I am sure that some do, but they are in the minority. Are you suggesting that your soul is on the same level as these Neanderthals? And when is the last time you had a "spitting contest"?
wB: Do women want to be in a dominant positon? no. Do they want all the power? no. Do they want a certain amount of power? yes. Why are many generally angry?
I think it is because fathers were rather aloof in their upbringing. Women are looking for something no one really understands. I thinks that thing is regard. Plain ol' simple regard.
And men want acceptance.
Its really is as simple as that.
Would you agree?
Excepted is good, other words men's biggest complaint is they don't want women to change them except changing the sheets on the bed.
Women want to be appreciated. Often they don't know what they want, just love them anyways because without them, were nothing.
Then we have sex, the greatest pleasure on earth or at least second to most things. Being in love romanticly is about the strongest high ever.
The longest love realationships has been my artist work. For no one can master life without loving your work. Luckly more women would perfer to be with an artist than a lawyer. Lucky in love, lucky in life and happy all over. Now to find a bigger and better romance out there, just have to gracefuly wait.
… we're all 33 at heart! We can't help it if the body ages, but our souls don't!
If a child falls in love at six, (or in my case, 8, and every two years after that,) isn't that proof of having had a past life or two? Personal tendencies and soul memories are expressing themselves on a subconscious level in children, but of course, the tendencies can't be acted upon until the appropriate age / situation.
I see the human life, and life in general , as a microcosm of a greater reality. I believe that what is true and observable in the physical world provides us with a map of eternity. And I see this as being more of a topographical map, as opposed to a political map. We may not see or understand all of the various details, but we can get an overall glimpse of the terrain.
For instance, everything we do here serves a purpose. We study so that we may learn, and what we learn always has a particular application. I can't imagine anyone having a completely meaningless life. When we look at the life of Nelson Mandela, we can understand the best years of his life were spent sitting in a cage, but inspite of this, those years were not meaningless, as we can now understand the purpose.
And it does not follow that God would begin such a wonderful creation, only to have it end in the blinking of an eye; that God would raise up great men and women only to deliver them back into the dust. A man does not build a house only to tear it down on the day that it is completed! I have understood since I was a child that my life in this time is only a continuation of what has come before. And I do not know from whence this knowledge comes. I only know it is real.
When speaking of the metaphysical, I find it amusing that many people will ask for proof of this. and for proof of that. But I cannot prove to you what a bowel movement feels like. We can only imagine that because we are both human, our bowel movements would feel the same. But we can never know this for sure. Even if my spirit could possess your body, and yours could possess mine; mine being a different spirit, your bodily functions would be interpreted in my own unique way. And so, how could I know for sure? Thus, there are many things in this life that can never be proven, and it is folly to linger there. With knowledge, there is no need of any proof. You have expressed that you have knowledge of a previous life, and I accept that it is true, since I also have that kind of knowledge. But I don't think it is important for us to remember all of the details. I believe the important thing is that we have been shaped by that previous life,and that the process of creation is building upon the past; always improving upon the original design.
This is why I have always looked forward to death, and I will welcome death as an old friend. For with each passing I begin a new life, and a new adventure. In this life I am a very sexy man, in the last life I may have been a very sexy woman, and in the next life I may not be sexy at all. The love that you felt as a child most likely was carried over from another time and place. Otherwise it would not have such significance after all of these years. We will die again, and then perhaps again we shall be reborn. But this time, I feel I will not be coming back to this place. I am too good for this world, and my love is too strong. If I must return again to the physical universe, I want to return to a place where the creatures there ... love each other, as much as the creatures here ... love their money.
The creatures there will truly relish their existence.
and in that world they will have free love with no consequences and all children will be happy even though no one is married …. and one day you will wake up in that world and wonder who is going to take care of you … but thats okay because in that world you will be having sex at six and who needs parents anyway?
PS and right before enterng that world you too will be a sexy zygote!!!
PSS and everyone buys everyone lunch in that world.
People can have sex addiction yet I don't think there is a love addiction because there are so many kinds of love and there is just enough love in the world.
love addiction … hmmm maybe that is God
If people were addicted to love, no one would sell the harmful drugs.Because it is not possible to sell harmful drugs to someone you love.
If people were addicted to love, they would not go to Church on Sunday. Instead of pretending Jesus, they would become Jesus, and perform great works.
If people were addicted to love, there would be no marriage, and there would be no prostitutes, because sex would be free
If people were addicted to love, only the very sick would be in hospice, and nursing homes, and families would care for their parents unto their passing.
If people were addicted to love there would be no protected sex, or busy abortion clinics,or orphanages. A child would be a blessing, and not an inconvenience.
If people were addicted to love, there would be no Aids Virus, because the government would not have infected the population.
If people were addicted to love their would be no Syrian refugees, and there would be no Palestinian struggle.
If people were addicted to love, the bones of my ancestors would not cry out for vengeance.
:All you need is love:
Just don't get the song
:Can't buy me lunch:
I love this. If everyone felt this way, the world would live in peace.
For perhaps the first time in your three years you did good WB. At least up to the pretend government conspiracy and the vengeance thing.
For those bones are but inanimate remains of your ancestors. It is not the dead calling for vengeance, it is the living and instead of love, for vengeance on those that were innocent of wrongdoing.
When I was a child, my peers would ridicule the retarded kids, and laugh about their affliction. But I could never understand why? Of course, it was apparent to me that the retarded children could not think and reason like the so-called "normal" children. It was difficult for them to grasp even the most basic concepts of arithmetic and language. But such awareness did not bring me pleasure. It was painful for me as a child to know that I had been given so much , while others had to struggle so very hard. And the pain was only multiplied by the fact that they were often openly taunted and ridiculed, simply for being that which God had made.
It is not uncommon for a normal child to hide him/or herself away in a closet, beneath a bed, or beneath an old rusty bridge and cry. They cry because they are not big enough to be brave, and they are not old enough to understand. And even when their Mothers cradle them in their loving arms, and even when their Father's carry them high upon their broad shoulders, these expressions of love cannot erase the cruel and evil images; still frames moving in quick succession ... welded fast into their new hearts and fragile minds.
I did not create myself. I was created by God, and then shaped by the world. The superior intellect allows me to see what others might miss. It is counter-productive for anyone to focus on whether or not I am arrogant ... when I am shouting: "A train is coming!", as their feet are planted firmly on the tracks with their back against tomorrow.
When I speak of the Aids Virus being introduced into the population, I am speaking as a prosecuting attorney might speak in a court of law. I do not need to remind that throughout the history of the United States, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of people have been falsely accused and convicted of crimes. Some have even been put to death, only to later be exonerated. This is fact, not fiction. Many such people are convicted on circumstantial evidence. It only follows: When we look at American History, and when we consider the atrocities committed by the colonialists, and then later the U.S. government against the African and the Indigenous, we begin to see a pattern. And although it has been delivered in a different measure, we must not forget that the poor and working class whites have also suffered at the hands of a corrupt government.The Great Depression was one of several catastrophic events orchestrated by the ruling elite. Just like in a criminal investigation, we may not have the smoking gun, but we are able to gather enough circumstantial evidence to make a credible case.
I do not have time to provide a history lesson, but the facts and information that have led me to this conclusion are readily available to anyone. To understand the depth of cruelty at the highest levels of authority, we need only to study the past and the present. I have devoted a good portion of my life to the purpose of achieving such an understanding. If you want to know ...what I know ...then you can know it. And in that knowledge you will have your proof.
Furthermore, you said that you have a son. I am sure that as a small child, he did not run and play across the busy highway, or the busy street. In fact, I am sure that a deserted highway, or a deserted street, would not have been acceptable as a playground. How do I know this? I know this because I am living in the world, and there is no need to further explain. But I also know that a child could play out in the street from the age of 5 to the age of puberty, and by luck of the draw never suffer an injury, or be killed by an automobile. But who in their right mind is willing to take that chance?
When I speak of the governments role in spreading the Aids Virus, the circumstantial evidence is enough to make us proceed with caution. Blindly believing that world governments would never commit such heinous acts, is simply not worth the risk of another diabolical scheme. Whether my accusation is true or false, rest assured,it will not prevent the needy greedy from paying their dues at the yacht club, attending celebrity events, or going to and fro across the Earth.
And finally, concerning the bones of my ancestors: Your outlook concerning the issue of Manifest Destiny is tainted by your false belief that time is linear. Time is cyclical, and the events along this time line are perpetual. But there are many secrets that I cannot reveal. Even under torture I could not reveal them, because I am only a sexy man, and there are no words that exist to explain such things. It is like a failsafe built into the mechanism. How many words would it take to explain to a little donkey the lyrics of the old Charlie Pride song," Kiss an Angel Good Morning"?
I can but stand in awe of your imagination and ability to rationalize whatever you want into a "personal truth".
Yes, imagination is a powerful force. When coupled with dis-information it can be deadly. For insatnce, the men in wigs, and their brethren thereafter, created an imaginary place called America. If you look on a political map you will see all of the nice divisions and borders. But of course, none of these are real. They only exist in the world of imagination. There is no natural earth, or stone, or river, or stream, or lake, or mountain on this continent that has "America" written on it, in it, or around it. But the signature of God is branded on every grain of sand, and upon every living thing. And we are only as real, or as sexy,as God has imagined us to be.
People want to be sexy, and I am showing them how, because I am a master of seduction, and I truly came to put out the fire. Imagination, and self-confidence are the cornerstones of sexiness. A man with limited imagination, who keeps his head down, and hides in the shadows, may be a good provider, but he is not very sexy. And this thread is about being sexy; not about being a good provider.
I've never understood the sex appeal of Mark Wahlberg. He just doesn't do it for me at all. I don't like super muscley guys though so maybe that's it.
I can relate to this feeling. Because I am very sexy, all types of women seek my affections. When I was a teenager, I would only date the "very sexy girls"; those who had the "Barbie Doll" look. But this was only because of peer pressure. It was during this time of my life that I began to understand the insidious evil that exists in this world. I was confounded by a lie, and I was made to believe in a stereotype.
I had always found the chubby, full figured girls just as appealing, and many of them wanted to be with me in very sexy ways. But they were not as fashionable to be seen with, and my ignorant, and hateful peers would commonly make fun of the boys with the plus size girls. It wasn't until years later that I realized I had been cheated, and made a fool of. And this is why I am so against conformity, because conformity and ignorance usually walk hand in hand.
I like the slightly less conventionally attractive types. Those with little quirks or things that make them stand out. I'm always told I have very strange taste in men and I'm okay with that!
It's good that you go your own way. Many people are very jealous also. And as you know, they will often tear someone down simply because they are very lonely, but not very sexy. This is another reason why I am letting my hair down and speaking candidly about sexual intimacy. Because people have such varied tastes, as you have pointed out, I believe that everyone can be sexy if they try. It is the stereotypes that discourage many people. For instance, I have a big nose. But John Lennon also had a big nose, and the women thought that he was a very sexy man. In the past, men who have been jealous of my popularity as a singer of songs, have made fun of my nose, but they never say anything about my big feet. Perhaps they are jealous that I wear a size 12 1/2 to 13 wide. But I refuse to be be timid or apologetic for the many gifts and talents that God has bestowed upon me.
Today we have everything, and tomorrow we will turn to dust. But what a wonderful world it has been with you! That's what the lucky man will say, because that is what you made him feel: breathless, dumbfounded, and lifted up by the hand of God.
I'm surprised at how many people here on this thread do not accept what you have to say. You are graciously trying your best to help all special-needs men and women who are challenged in the area of sexiness.
A sexy man does have many advantages. Take Hillary Clinton for instance. It is possible that she has the women's vote not for what she promises women but for the value of who she is married to! A "Sexy" Man!!! (He could be back in the saddle and not all thanks to Hillary!) Are you as sexy as Bill Clinton????
I am blown away by the dazzle of your brilliant sexiness based on what you have explained and don't be surprised if I show up at your door there in Florida. But, I am wondering … what will you do with me after a night of passion? (Men have to pay call girls to leave because sexy bed romping could otherwise lead to love.)
Have you ever had a stalker? or a paternity suit?
I am not surprised with the negative responses. I grew up near the Mason Dixon Line, and so I take it in stride. I have anything but a low-self esteem, and so I don't know why they bother, as it is only dogs barking.
It is remarkable that people would criticize something they are getting for free that has more potential value than what they would get if they spent $150-$200 for a counselor or sex therapist. Most of these "professionals" are paint by numbers people. What they tell you, they will tell me, and then they will tell the next guy the same thing. It's all very generic, and all about money. But if something doesn't have a price tag on it, many consider it to be worthless. But that's because people have been blinded by money and materialism. It is very strange indeed that they would pay someone with a degree; someone who has had very few sexual partners, and who has not lived the life of a sexy man, to improve their sex life. That's like paying someone who has never flown a jet airplane to teach you how to fly. It is absurd. The whole educational system is ass backwards, and also all about money. I have no respect for it at all.
No I have never had a paternity suit, but I have had a stalker. She was a girlfiend of mine that I nicknamed "Sweet Jean". She was nearly full blooded Irish; a very tall and skinny blonde; very sexy, and very intelligent. But she was anything but sweet. In fact that is why I named her "Sweet Jean", because she was nothing but the devil. She would show up at my gigs wearing hot pants and half shirts. I would be playing on stage and I could see the men at the bar descend on her like fruit flies. She did this on purpose because I had asked her not to come to my shows for this very reason. Please, I am not an extremely jealous person, but it was very annoying to be singing songs while watching horny men hit on my girlfriend. To make matters worse, she would tell them I was her half brother, just to stir the pot.
Finally after a couple of years, I decided that it was time to pull the plug on Sweet Jean. But she did not take it too well. She started calling my house leaving hateful messages. She would even on occasion have one of her old boyfriends call and harass me. She continued to show up at my gigs in sexy clothes, and flaunt herself to annoy me. But by then I really didn't care. Finally one night while packing up from a gig, I was walking to my car with my guitar, and out of nowhere I was blinded by the high beams. I heard the roar of a car engine, and then saw the little red car speeding directly toward me. It was Sweet Jean. It all happened very fast, but I will never forget the look of her face through the windshield. It was a very demonic, and determined look .I jumped out of the way, but she circled in the parking lot and came at me again, spinning her tires on the asphalt. By this time people had come running out of the bar to see about the commotion. She then panicked, and left the scene. I truly think she only wanted to scare me. But she could have killed me if I had fallen under her car.
That was the last time I saw Sweet Jean. Sexually we were 150%, but when we weren't having sex, we really didn't care that much for each other. And her violent actions were not because she loved me so much, but only because I was a prize possession. After all, I am a very sexy man. She could not get over the fact that I dumped her first, and it nearly drove her insane. Her skin was very pale, and when she would become angry, her face would become as a red hot oven. Her veins would swell and pop out of the side of her neck, and it looked as if her face was going to bleed! Sometimes I would provoke her on purpose, just so I could enjoy the spectacle. And these are all memories that I will cherish forever. But please, many people think that I am only joking when I say, " It is not easy ... being a sexy man".
I am sure that much of what you have said is tongue in cheek, but I see rejection as only a greater challenge to overcome. Bill Clinton was a handsome man in his day. But now that day has passed, and I am a much sexier man. In order to "make" love to a woman, you must first "love" the woman. This is where many men fail, and I can tell that many of you misunderstand what it means to be a sexy man. The sexy man does not jump in and out of bed with women. Yes, there are ocassions as I have already mentioned, when women have literally forced themselves upon me. But what could I do, except to fulfill their desire? But as a rule, the sexy man will stay with one woman until it runs it's course. And so, the sexy man is like a rolling stone, but it is often a very slow roll.
I had two stalker, one I dumped my ex wife who wrote $10,000 fraudulent checks to herself. I had many child custody battles.
The other women was hooked on cocaine and attempted suicide when I dumped her. I can not Ultimatly love someone who can not respect or love themselves.
Mine was not so serious overall, and it did not cost me any money. But both of these were very serious. I am sure it was very emotional, and as you know it could have been a lot worse. Some women can be just as destructive as men. It is really sad when a woman who has enjoyed the sexy man; the man who has taken her to that special place where time stands still, becomes corrupted with drugs and money. If I ruled the world, the first thing I would do would be to collect all of the money, and then put it to the torch. As the evil paper illuminated the night, the citizens would stand around the blazing bonfire, and holding hands they would sing in unison; just like the little Who's in Whoville. And Love would be the new national currency. I would not have to worry so much about collecting the guns, because without the money, the guns would no longer serve any purpose. Here are some other benefits:
• Married couples would no longer kill each other for the insurance money
• Without money there would be no need to fight over oil or any other natural resource
• Without money the illicit drug trade would literally dry up overnight
• Without money the pharmaceutical industry would no longer produce, promote , and sell addictive drugs such as oxycodone
• Without money greedy people would not become doctors, lawyers, or judges
• Without money there would be fewer abortions, as there would be no incentive to sell fetal tissue. Nor would their be a need to decrease a growing black and brown population that poses a threat to the economic and political supremacy of white America.
• Without money there would be no rich people to enlist poor people to kidnap and kill other poor people in order to harvest organs
• Without money politicians like Hillary Clinton would not be able to steal an election
• Without money Donald Trump would have nothing to brag about
• Without money everyone could get a quality education
• Without money there would be no Industrial Military Complex
• Without money there would be a cure for cancer
• Without money greedy people like Dick Cheney, George Bush, and the Clintons would become addicted to opium, and would no longer be a threat to world peace
• Without money, and all of the accompanying distractions, wrenchBiscuit would be a household name; a sexy man would be widely recognized for his worth
• Without money, everyone could enjoy the worlds oldest profession
Thank you for the interesting anecdote, wB. What is the main reason for romances running their courses, I am wondering? I suppose it is different for each one. I guess it is a natural thing for romances to run their courses. How long is the average span of time? I would guess five years.
(We need an advice feature. Call it "Dear Sexy Man." Lately I have been thinking HubPages should really print up some of this stuff in their own newspaper or something:" HubPages Herald Explorer".
Yes, I have always thought that 5 years was the average limit. After that the old ennui often leads us astray. But I have met people who swear that the excitement is still there after 20 years or more. I would like to believe that this is true, but it seems to contradict the Law of Gravity. Please, I never stop loving a woman once I have made the bond, and that love continues to grow. But the sexual excitement always seems to fade.
For me, I have found that familiarity is what destroys the sexual excitement. This is why I would recommend ( another bit of free advice that would cost over $150 and hr) separate bedrooms for people attempting to make the romance last. That also includes seperate bathrooms, for obvious reasons. Although not practical for most, those with disposable incomes should live in separate quarters; limiting your sexual activity to once a week or staggering it even more if you can. The more time in-between the greater the increase of sexual tension. Sexual tension is the sexy man's secret weapon. Having sexual intercourse everyday is the quickest way to kill a romance.
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Good Sex can save the world.
My My. Things we just did not know! A lady from India told me that In the west, sleeping together in the same room/bed is a "sacred cow" and that separate bedrooms is much better.
I would agree!!!
Thanks for your (free) wise counsel.
I am raising my hand with some other questions:
1. How do we provide for children created in love and passion without money?
2.) Would you say that lifetime commitment of lovers who produce children is unnecessary even though children need a loving, secure foundation?
3. Without this commitment many children would not know one parent or the other or grandparents!
A. Do you believe a two parent family is valuable in raising human offspring?
B. Do you believe grandparents are valuable in children's lives?
The Return of A Sexy Man
To answer your question about money:
I am very sexy, and so I can tell you that it is next to impossibe to prosper in an evil system of money while trying to live without it. In America freedom is measured by money. Money allows the citizen to afford the price of admission. Because people in this society suffer without money, it is commonly mistaken that the evil can be defined as a lack of money. But that is a lie. Poverty exists because of the gatekeepers who have forced the population to live within the confines of an oppressive monetary system. An industrious man can no longer stake claim to a plot of land, build a home , and raise a family, as it were in the day when men were truly free.
Today, this evil system has erected many barriers that require the citizen to pay a toll, or tribute, in order to get around them. We could easily create an ordered system without the perversion of "Real Estate"; where every citizen at birth, instead of being branded with a social security number, would be branded with the right to possess what was needed for him or her to prosper. In a truly free society, the citizen would not pay a greedy gatekeeper for the land. The land is our birthright. The citizen would only be required to build and properly maintain his own home within the prescribed parameters set forth by the community. Homelessness could not exist in a free society. This is because, fundamentally, homelessness does not necessarily mean "without four walls around you".
For instance, I grew up on a 200 acre farm in the mid-west. Rolling hills, fields of corn, wheat, and clover were surrounded by thick green forests. If our home would have burned down, we would not have been homeless. Even without the modern conveniences of a refrigerator or a stove, we would have survived until my Father built another house. It is not necessarily the "house" that defines a home. Fundamentally, it is "the land". When a man has possession of the land, he can never be homeless. Even if he must pitch a tent, at least he has a place where he belongs, where no man can challenge his right to be there. And so I have delivered a great teaching that heretofore has not been expressed in such a manner.
Sexy Ideas On Marriage:
You are an intelligent and sexy woman. I have lived in L.A.,San Diego, and Santa Cruz , and so I am aware that there are many sexy women living in California. As a child I loved the Beach Boys song "California Girls" , and because I was so sexy, I knew that I would be welcome there. However, in spite of your sexy ways, your assumptions about marriage have already been proven to be false; not by my superior intellect, but by the superior intellect of the Icelanders. Iceland leads the world in unwed mothers. And so, they are pointing the way to the future. Here in America , many things have been perverted by religious fanatics and an oppressive social paradigm. It is a common stereotype here in the United States that a family outside the traditional framework of marriage is a "broken family", but their are few broken families in Iceland, and the children are loved and well taken care of.
The high divorce rate here in the United States is not necessarily an indication that the people are morally corrupt and irresponsible. Anytime you seek to pervert human nature through oppressive customs, and laws, you will start to see cracks in the pavement. But the important video I have provided to supplement this thoughtful commentary explains the difference much better than I can. What exists today in Iceland is a perfect example of the "Ubermensch" at work. This is what can happen when the superior intellect is allowed to creatively direct the social and moral evolution of a society, as opposed to outdated, oppressive, religious doctrines. Marriage in America is simply an industry. It is a cash cow for corrupt judges, lawyers, insurance companies, marriage counselors, and a host of other greedy opportunists riding high on the gravy train.
Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crr1wppZvqY
Find some ways to look after the children.
If it was for love and passion, you should have taken every possible care.
And no, i wouldn't say that lifetime commitment of lovers is unnecessary.
If children need a secure foundation, you must take proper care in every way possible.
Yes, a two parent family is very valuable in raising an offspring.
Hell yes! Grandparents are very valuable in Children's lives. Trust me, they are.
Wow this is by far the funniest/most revolting discussion on HP at the moment. God given erections, misogyny, racism, confusion, ego, androgyny (?spelling), utter mayhem.
Look at it this way: we are all better at sex than sex gods like Elvis, MJ, Jim Morrison or Prince cuz they all dead.
I wouldn't trust someone who wants to share their sexual secrets of "power" as they sound very creepy in a Freddy Kruger kind of way.
It's a con right? It's meant to be a joke I hope, otherwise there is a some kind of Cletus-like snake handling hillbilly out of the movie "Deliverance" soiling our HP.
LOL, I can't think of anything less sexy than a disquisition on one's sexiness.
No, I am afraid this is no joke. But I wish it were. The world is dying, and many lies have been delivered; fashioned into grotesque monuments of stone. People want to be sexy,and I am showing them how.
If God did not give man an erection then from whence does that erection come? Was it you who created it? Or was it some evil diabolical force? But these are only rhetorical questions. It is clear that your purpose here is to injure and to ridicule.
There was a time in America when white women were tied to a stake and burned alive by white people; perhaps because they had talents misunderstood, or perhaps because they were simply beautiful and sexy women who were branded with a lie. But as a student of history, and a very sexy man who has mastered the art of seduction, I am not deterred by your pedestrian insults. If you should need my help in the future to untangle your life, then I will expect a formal apology ... posted online for all to see. Let the world marvel at this great teaching.
Yep that's a snake handling Cletus/Freddy Kruger- cross "Deliverance squealing" in the land of make believe. Nice pic, so appropriate; no doubt taken from a bizarre collage taped to a dirty shack's wall in the deep woods. Who-wee!! Yum yum might just fry up some possum innards out by the ce-ment pond while I belt out a tune on this here old hill billy banjo. That'll get the ol missus movin and a gigglin like a sow in tha mud. I'll just be a sittin and a whittlin and a picken the leftovers right outta my teeth a marvellin at my enormous sexual power healed by the power of the great almighty mouse. Hey what's this ahere padded cell a doin in my lil ol fantasy!! Hey now this a haint my lil ol mountain shack this now ahere a downright men tal hos pit hal. Get me outta here.........
His true goal is to promote anarchy. His sexy man role is merely to promote his ultimate end.
And as you have revealed, its not a climax.
although to be fair he did explain this:
"… a man can survive without an active sex life. And it may be good for you, as it will force you to explore the deeper aspects of the woman that you desire. The anticipation, and the sexual tension will continue to build throughout your courtship. By the time you are married you will be as a raging bull. You will experience a volcanic eruption of carnal delight that will leave you breathless and broken, like a porcelain doll that has been tossed to the pavement from a vehicle moving at a high rate of speed."
(PS I don't think I have ever had this effect on a man. ! )
"High rate of speed." How dramatic. I guess that could work the first time around, but after that the high speed thing gets old real fast.
WB stated that to me because I ask about sex with Bolivia woman. Bolivia make it illegal to have sex before marriage.
At my age I can't imagine being doll toss around from a raging bull over the absence of sex. Just thought something in between from being over sexed person would be worth more patient for heighten pleasure.
Yes it's obvious. People who remove love and consideration from life have been scientifically analysed and found to be sociopathic. That's the definition of sociopathic. Compulsive rapists see themselves as "great seducers" to justify what they do. Often they use drugs to immobilise a victim.
Further musing: I suppose in the Garden of Eden, Eve did her own gathering of fruit. Adam never had to provide for her. (Edit: or vice versa) God did. Don't you think sex itself is being a little overly-familiar?
I believe being overly-familiar is wrong on many levels. Parents toward their children, siblings toward each other, teachers, politicians, jail wardens, judges, police, shop keepers, presidents, bosses, talk show hosts, neighbors, pet owners, relatives, husbands, wives, boyfriends, girlfriends, friends, etc.…
But what defines this behavior?
There are a number of ethical dilemmas with WBs philosophy.
Firstly presenting one's own personal philosophy as a mish mash of "other's " philosophy plus one's "real" philosophy is dishonest and is technically trolling. Ethically speaking this process is not a discussion. Hence adding to the general dishonesty.
The mish mash adds to the feeling of talking to a possibly unstable identity. The theme of misogyny is inexcusable on every level. Misogyny is a sociopathic tendancy.
Secondly, there is a very clear egocentric tendancy to brag about alleged sexual superiority. Admittedly I have not taken the time to read the very long rambling justifications for this allegation of egocentric sexual athletics. It's just too boring.
Thirdly when "the subject" feels threatened there is a tendancy to use shocking images. In one case dead soldiers from the civil war etc. This reveals the enormous anger of "the subject". Such seething anger is of concern and adds further to the profile of a possibly highly unstable person. A real ladies man is a happy man not an angry man.
In plain language it is impossible to have a "discussion" with someone who uses misrepresentations, anger, misogyny and hidden personal agendas.
Ergo this is not a discussion as required.
It did start out interesting, as we went along it seemed move all over the map.
I'm more interested in his anarchy way of thinking then his hog posh of confusions about sex and love.
When a man can have sex at age 107. Or keep a sexual relationship with one woman for over 40 years and tell her he loves her. Then that is pleasure impressive or ultimate love.
When WB talks about positive hate and saying it normal to have 60 to 600 sexual partners in your lifetime. That is not a vision of a healthy sexual relationship. That is a frog jumping from Lilly pad to Lilly pad.
I have covered the issue of positive hate ad nauseam. I cannot account for the fact that you have misinterpreted my meaning. And so, there is no need to "beat the horse". But I will take issue with your comment "... and saying it normal to have 60 to 600 sexual partners in your lifetime." Some people would call your assertion a fiction, some would call it a distortion, others be would simply call it a lie. I have never in my life said that it was "normal" to have 60 to 600 sexual partners in a lifetime.
And considering the higher number, it is well known that the only men who enjoy such a variety are wealthy men of power: Kings, Sultans, and Bill Clinton. Such a condition is anything but "normal". In fact, I haven't commented that a sexual relationship with"one" woman is normal. This is a perfect example of how hyperbole is used to slander someone. Why does it bother everyone so much that I am sexy? Perhaps they are jealous because they do not feel so sexy. And perhaps they are also jealous because they are locked in a prison, and they are afraid to break the lock, open the door, and climb over the wall.
If you are interested in Anarchy, here is the link to my audio-book, which you can listen to for free in its entirety. I have also included a soundtrack that would also be good for sexy moments.
Anarchy: http://wrenchbiscuit.blogspot.com/p/ana … obook.html
It is obvious that you are seeking to passively censor my viewpoints by using various keywords like "concern" and "unstable". Your goal is to silence my rich commentary; an expression of truth that has provided a powerful glimpse into the insidious censoring mechanism which operates here in America; a mechanism designed to silence any, and all opposition to the status quo, and any variance thereof. Even a man who openly speaks of sexuality is chastised if his views do not fit those of the muted majority. You have even admitted to the fact that you have purposely ignored my thoughtful commentary. This clearly reveals that your primary goal is not to further your understanding of the superior intellect, but only to further your own narrative.
Much of what you have said is the standard vitriol, and warrants no special consideration. However, if you want to have a discussion, and you are even capable of doing so, then please start by addressing the issue of misogyny that you have raised. I find this remarkable since I have always admired women, and have always been a champion of womens rights. Furthermore, how could I dislike women when I have provided them with extreme pleasure, and total satisfaction, since I was 14 years old? Please reveal to the world, with your great intellect, how I have demonstrated a dislike for women. But be forewarned, you are dealing with a past master, and I take no prisoners. Let the games begin!
I work for a living and cant spend these huge amounts of time chatting. Brevity is wit not long winded strange verbosity. I've scanned your words and am not impressed at all. Yes I believe you could be very unstable.
If you don't have time to read someone's commentary, then that means you don't know where they stand, or what they are talking about. So how on God's green Earth can you form an opinion about an unknown? That is absurd. And your suggestion that "brevity is wit..." betrays a covetous emotion. My purpose here is to help people to understand sexuality, and to be sexy.This is not a course in creative writing, or a methodology such as "How To Be Witty In Three Easy Steps". And not only do you feel the need to censor the content of my speech, but you also want to moderate the length of my commentary. Furthermore, I have no need to impress, or curry favor with my subordinates. No more than I should have a need to gain the approval of a cricket, a snail, or a bag of rusty nine inch nails.
I don't care about your other comments. You didn't answer my question. Why? Because you can't? You claimed I was a misogynist.I asked you to explain your justification for such slander. Surely, if you have any command of the English language you could do that in less than 300 words. I have no problem with people disagreeing with my comments. But there is a distinct difference between disagreement and slander.
You made the first move, and I have not slandered you in the least, before or since. When you publicly challenge someone you should be prepared to back it up. All of my words are here for all to see. Where is the misogyny? If you cannot answer my question, then it appears that you are the one who is unstable. Being sexy is not easy. but I would rather be the sexy man that I am, than someone filled with jealousy, and self-loathing.
a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.
Love is when two people or thing are stronger together than apart. With many acts of kindness and there is many kinds of love and degrees. The ultimate love is romantic love and sex is in part of the bond. This love is like a rose that dose happen over night. It takes time to blossom and to flourish as I gave an example of a couple of over 40 years can contained.
I'm not an example of this most beautiful love accomplishment on earth, yet better than most. My sacrifice was a love realationships with professional art work spanning nearly 42 years and will have traveled in my next tour a 100 countries. Yes many of my love realationships crumble like my sandcastles.
I've entertained 10s of millions of people, and woman flock to me anywhere I go. Yet the dream of satisfaction of keeping just one woman happy for decades has not been fulfilled. Out of 32 sexual lifetime partners only 3 were true loves. I was more at fault for not physically being around enough. It"s my time to do what ever it takes to make a long lasting relationship happen now.
WB your delusion of 60 or more sexual partners maybe a truckers wet dream. Yet look the adverage person dissatisfion with 10 sexual partners in their lifetime. Add to that most people are dissatisfied with their work for most waking hours of their lives. The single most greatest wasted time in a humans existence. Add any kind of hate with that, you will not master life or have a successful life.
At least most likely you love your work because most veteran artist do. Yet overall for much part your miss guiding the average persons sexual affairs. Yet do agree most people are not getting enough good healthy sex into their lives
I would know where my narrative boarders are. It's 50℅ about me and 50℅ about the world. You were offering your insight into our sexual life. It is not my business to judge your own personal sexual desire, for I don't know what gose on behind your eyeballs, whatever works for you is good.
I given you more praise overall than most on this thread and to most hubbers. To state that I'm Slander you is nonsense. I only Slander clearly Corporatism where we are more agreeable on. Strongly disagreeing on things I can do with my very best of friends and family. I have only personally Slander GW Bush and my ex wife due to most damage to my life. Some said you were trolling. I said you were not, he has much to offer. He just needs adjustment like all of us.
Yet if you are too superior for us , a know it all, it's what you learn afterward is what counts. If your wanting to win true friends, you need to adjust.
You are the one who needs to adjust. You completely evaded the issue. And so I will raise the issue once again. Show me where in this thread, or anywhere else online, where I have said it is normal for a man to have "60 or 600 girlfriends". That was your accusation, which should be easy for you to prove. Where is the smoking gun? Either you misunderstood, or you purposely told a lie. But regardless of your motivations, you created a fiction. If you want to be my friend, it is not necessary to always agree, but I do expect people to be honest.
My only two simple rules in life.
1. Be honest
2. Do not harm
You had a level of sexual partners list from A to D. A being beyond Wilt Chambertin world record for sexual partners. Then you said a realist choice was answer would be C and D for a high sexual active life span of 60 years. No other choice below 60 sex partner s given.
You got an IQ of 300, beyond any human i have ever heard of. You figure it out.
I do build fantasy fairytale in my sandcastle and sculpture. Yet my animals don't really talk for real like in Bible.
Those were simply realistic numbers that someone might shoot for if their goal was a high number of sexual partners in a short and sexy lifetime. Of course, some men have had many more, but I am not talkng about one night stands (O.N.S.). I was looking at the situation more conservatively. You are the one that added "normal" to the mix. What is normal is for people to be sexy, regardless of how many partners they tally in one lifetime. The quality of sexiness is very important. Yes it is true that some women may not prefer my good looks, my personality, or my bohemian lifestyle, but they seldom deny my sexy ways. I give them the special things that women dream about, but rarely realize with men who have become good providers, but who basically live out their lives as pack animals; like the little Burros.
But there are a few here on Hubpages who are afraid of sexy people. Perhaps they have had bad experiences in the past. Sexual frustration can also cause people to lash in anger. But I have not been sexually frustrated since the age of 14.
As you can tell, I chastise people when they must be corrected, but I do not "blow my top" as you see them doing here. I do not call people by vicious, nasty, and derogatory names, as I am of a superior intellect, and so I would not embarrass myself by acting in such a childish manner. I often refer to humans in general as monkeys,baboons, sheep, or goats, but I never single someone out and suggest that they are a baboon, even though I realize that a baboon may be even smarter. And I can prove to you that the average human is not very smart:
It has been widely accepted for the last 50 years that a high percentage of people, world wide, will die in Motor Vehicle Collisions annually. In the United States alone, approx. 40,000 people die each year as a result of MVC's. This is quite remarkable. They actually predict how many sexy people are going to die, and their predictions come true every year, give or take a few thousand. Yet, a majority continues to drive a killing machine! How smart is that? The average American plays Russian Roulette everyday when they get behind the wheel of an automobile. If this is not stupidity, then it must surely be outright insanity! Many U.S. citizens claim that the United States is "by the people for the people" but of course that is a grand fiction. In truth, it is "by the rich, for the rich". If this country was truly "by the people" then steps would have been taken long ago; important steps to set up an economic system that does not require the automobile in order to function at an optimum level. Efficient, nation-wide, mass transit systems would already be in place, and the automobile would only be necessary for police, emergency , public works, freight,and special occupations: plumbers, electricians, contractors, etc..
The death toll from the automobile amounts to nothing less than a modern form of human sacrifice. A death toll of 40,000+ is simply considered by many to be the cost of doing business. This is how they look at human life; as nothing more than percentages. Only people of superior intellect have recognized this unfortunate truth, and many are now trying their best to educate a populace that has been "dumbed down" by materialism, and greed.
Well you have the highest QI in human history. You almost double the IQ of Einstein and Hawkins. I Don't know how the blood ever gets down to your little head.
Rather than apologize for a fiction, you continue with more insults, when a man in your position should be seeking my advice. Once again, I exhibit the superior intellect by not responding in kind. And once again, you have demeaned yourself.
And are you so naive, as to actually believe that the greatest , and most intelligent men who have ever lived, have all been revealed to you by world governments? The purpose of world governments is to control. And much of that control is achieved through deception. Men like Tesla, and Einstein, have been held up to the light of the world as the exceptions. But that is just another lie. Yes, it is true that people of average intelligence outnumber sexy people like myself, but in spite of this, we are legion.
However, world governments do not want the people to know this. Such knowledge would only empower the people, and bring an end to tyranny. If you want to be sexy, you must have self-control. Lashing out in anger is childish, and not sexy at all.
And so God, through his humble servant, has delivered another great teaching. Read,Learn, and Prosper!
Since my sexual partners are 3 times greater and very satisfying than average. I don't really need advice for sex. Yet, we all can always use some tips for improvement our lovers relationship, like a good lube job.
Being a Artist/entertainer I'm child like not childish. Actually I'm more adult like about life than most people.
Going by this thread I find many ridicule you and how can I take you seriously when you tell us, you have an IQ of 300. Then suggest to increase their average sex partners by 6 times at least.
If hear another... I'm sexyyy
..I'm sexyyy I'm going to get an image of fat bastard.
I don't get angry because it is inefficient. I don't get insulted because if it's true I'm learning something,. If it's not true for most part it's ignored.
Being honest and love myself most, how can I demean myself? Any tips on that?.
I'm not religious, atheist are more obsess with it than me..America made atheist a religion in America. So I'm certainly not obsess or clouded issues with God, America are world champions of sins
they don't need to bless me.
If I were another religion. Rule no. 1 .We don't talk about the flight club.
I am sexy. If that troubles you then that is your problem not mine. And as far as my IQ is concerned. I don't recall telling you my IQ is 300. If so please show me the comment. In fact, I suspect it is much higher. I say this because the human is not far removed from a monkey. In fact, we can understand the human to be a talking monkey. And a human who goes more than several days without soap and water, will often smell worse than many other animals.
The human is slowly beginning to understand basic concepts that have existed since the beginning of time. But human arrogance is perhaps the most developed aspect of the human character. When children are tested at a young age in order to determine IQ, we must not forget that they are being tested by a primitive race. Consequently, the tests are only as good as our society's current level of intellectual, and technological development. For instance, I am not aware if any IQ tests currently being administered to children that test for psychic abilities. I know that I was not tested for psychic abilities as a child. If psychic abilities are not included in measuring the intelligence of an individual, then we are not getting an accurate assessment of that individuals intellectual potential.
You could have some psychic ability but you have probably not mastered it, 100%.
If I had mastered it, or at least developed it to a high degree, I wouldn't tell you Kathryn. But there are many different psychic talents. Psychokinesis,Telepathy,Pyrokinesis, Precognition, Psychometry, etc.. I will tell you that my precognitive ability was manifested at an early age. I would have visions, and then those visions would be made manifest; days, or even weeks later. The worst precognitive experience I had was when my daughter was aborted. It was a terrible experience. I was attending college , and had become involved with a young woman. We were engaged to be married, but the day before Christmas she returned the engagement ring.
These were very dark days for the sexy man. I was very upset,and I became very depressed. I could not understand why she had pushed me away. Please, before I go any further you must understand that I have never wanted children. And so, I was not getting married to raise a family, but only to have a sexy companion. And this is important for you to understand, because it helps to verify the authenticity of the vision. It is not uncommon for us to have night dreams about things we desire, but seldom do we dream about events that have no place in our lives, only to see those events later unfold.
One night, about a week after she had broken our engagement, I dreamed of a beautiful little girl. But this little girl was not a newborn baby. She reminded of a 2 or 3 year old child, and she had a beautiful head of medium length coal black hair, and she was crying, she was speaking to me with her spirit, and it was a scream for help. And even unto this day, I try very hard to block it out of my mind. This is the first I have thought of it in a while. I awoke the next morning and vividly remembered the dream, but I could not understand. I did not connect the dream to my ex-girlfriend because she had never expressed the desire for children, and she was also taking the pill. Several weeks after winter break a girl friend of my ex, a real busy body, approached me on campus, took me aside, and told me that my ex-girlfriend had an abortion. She explained that's why the engagement had been broken.
At that very moment, I understood that what I had previously considered a dream, was actually a vision. And so, it was at this point that I lost all of my sexy ways. I began scouring the campus looking for her, I interrupted classrooms, and lectures that were in session looking to see if she was there; causing quite a stir. I finally found her in the school common, and that is where the explosion occurred. There must have been 200 kids in the common that day during lunch time. She was standing in line with a tray of food, and I began to scream at her. I called her a murderer, and then she threw her tray to the floor and started screaming back at me! The entire school common fell silent. It was a very bad scene. She stood there shaking with anger, and she did not look very sexy. I was angry, and very embarrassed. After the screaming ended, which I am sure lasted for less than a minute, I turned away and left the common. To this day she does not know I had this vision, and she will never know the reason for my anger.
This is why, even though I am very liberal, I believe that abortion should be avoided at all costs. My ex-girlfriend became pregnant; not because she was raped, or a victim of incest. She became pregnant because we were both careless and irresponsible. As a result, a child did not just die, but a child was murdered. I have no idea how far along she was, but it really doesn't matter. Had I not realized the vision, I would not feel this way today.
Since we are being so frank here, I will tell you a true anecdote as well.
I met a man at the local Y in the jacuzzi who went on and on about his job as a male prostitute.
He was paid by women to act out their fantasies. He was actually a kind of sex therapist. He said most women wanted their husbands to be more creative and more into it. They wanted to be held afterwards too. Husbands rolling over and snoring to sleep was a major complaint.
He had a vasectomy and had shaved off all his body hair, (to avoid catching germs.) I told him he was lucky that he never caught anything bad. He explained these were very upscale ladies. Anyway, my point is that to this day he enjoys being a sexy man. He is in his early seventies. Here is the clincher to his story: In Vietnam as a young soldier he had experienced many horrors. One of the horrors was witnessing fellow soldiers raping the village women. I said maybe on some (subconscious) level he was correcting that evil he witnessed as a young man.
PS he offered to "help" me, but I told him I did not like sex. This allowed us to speak freely.
I felt sorry for him because he could never be a husband. He had no desire for a wife. He was happy as he was: Alone. Free. But I felt (psychically) that he wanted what we all want: A romance to last. He had actually given up hope.
If your girlfriend had kept the child you might have married (even if only spiritually) and been happily ever after.
No, we would not have lasted very long. I was too sexy, and she was too materialistic. I am only sorry about my little girl, and even though I did not want children, if she had been born, I know I would have changed my mind. Otherwise, I would not have became so angry and depressed. By the time I found out about the abortion, I had started to untangle myself from the relationship, and so my anger had very little to do with the break up. I was ready to move on.
The gigolo is an interesting character, and of course, they all must be sexy. Otherwise, they will go hungry. I can also relate to the pathos as you described. And his story about the crime against humanity is all too familiar. This is a perfect example of why I get so angry with these war mongers, and the arm-chair warriors who perpetuate this misery with their tax dollars. It was never just soldiers dying on a battle field. The deluxe package of carnage and mayhem always comes with the extra horrors, as you have described. It is unfortunate that the majority cannot see the real enemies of mankind.
But I was never interested in that profession, although I would have done quite well. I'm sure I would have made more money than I have as a professional musician. But there is another side to the male gigolo that is not often revealed.
While living near Anaheim, in Orange County, a friend of mine who played bass started working for an escort agency. He was playing full time in a local cover band, but he needed the extra cash. At first, the escort agency sent him to call on older females, and being sexy like me, he said that it was exhilarating to do what came natural, and then get paid high dollar for it. But after a month or so the agency began to insist that he also start servicing a male clientele. But because my friend was straight, he couldn't do it, and so he had to quit. He was very sad, because for a short while, he had dreams of being an "American Gigolo"; wearing expensive suits, and driving sexy cars. But instead, he was back on the chain gang with the rest of us; playing for drunks in seedy nightclubs, and local bars.
"Lashing out in anger is childish, and not sexy at all."
Sometimes it gets the job done, though.
Maybe seeming sexy is overrated.
Were the revolutionaries on the American front who were fighting the Red Coats worrying about their sexy-ness?
… and OUR government was established to provide boundaries when the people themselves don't know how to govern / protect themselves. Especially against foreign enemies.
If the "Indians" had control of the whole country (area of the US) in a unified way they could have fought off the colonialists. So we worked toward unification through establishing individual states and you who benefit from our system of govt. criticize it. Not all governments aim for tyranny. Well, maybe they do, but The (OUR) Constitution aims to prevent it from happening.
Power to the people.
Some hate the Founding fathers.
Don't hate the founding fathers.
They had OUR backs.
That is where you are mistaken Kathryn. Any student of history can tell you that many of the men in Washington's army did not want to be there. Many were forced under threat of execution to participate. The first American war was like all of the rest. It was a rich man's war to further empower the rich. On top of that Washington and Jefferson were slave-owners. If you studied the history you would understand this to be true. Furthermore, the United States is still a British Colony!
Read it and weep: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/socio … obalbankin
led me here: HTTP Error 404.0 - Not Found
got another one?
"Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the militias.
The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2).
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire."
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/ha … colony.htm
The America Constitution is almost flawless. Much of the ideas came from the Native people.
Soon as the today leaders treated the Constitution and the dollar like toilets paper , America crumbles.
boredom, tedium, listlessness, lethargy, lassitude, languor, weariness, enervation; malaise, dissatisfaction, melancholy, depression, world-weariness. T
Joy can only come from within. Don't depend on that girl or guy to satisfy you. It has to come from within even when you are with them. If you find joy within you, you will be irresistible.
My opinion is this: If you love your job and are a happy provider it does not necessarily contribute to over-familiarity.
What contributes to over-familiarity is not respecting yourself, your devoted partner, people in your family, life and people in general. All people need space and quiet. They need kind regard and they need ... did I mention this: SPACE. Let them come to you. Don't bombard them.
The Federal Constitution of the United States of America was established and ordained by the convention of states in September 17, 1787.
order or decree (something) officially:
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Gandhi said it is best to believe a man…. all these men. Have you read their words and taken note of the kind of people they were? I really doubt it.
BTW Alexander Hamilton died in debt.
I have studied this evil cabal since I was a child. Not only at school, because that is where the children are taught the Pollyanna version of American History. My parents also taught me at home, and took me to the library on weekends. I learned at an early age about the lies and the deceptions.
What a Woman Should Know About A Man ... and Marriage Counselors
Your method of attack is more cunning and creative than many of those who have dared to challenge my authority. And so, instead of responding to your succinct and mordant soundbyte with vitriol, or denial, I will pleasure you with more of my superior intellect.
A man has the capacity to love a woman forever, and for many men, the love they have for a woman will only continue to grow with each passing year. However, that is only one half of the truth that the politically correct "Don't Worry Be Happy" - "We Are The World" crowd has been promoting. But here is the other half of the truth: The high divorce rate, the continued popularity of the world's oldest profession, and the proliferation of pornography, all point in the same direction. After a certain period of time, which may vary from one man to the next, a man will invariably lose sexual interest in his partner. And there is nothing a woman can do about it. Nor is there anything a man can do about it. This is simply a fact of life, and we need to accept the facts of life. Once we accept the inevitability of the ennui, we can then move forward in a positive direction.
I once had an acquaintance who thought that I thought he was my friend. (and I have had many of these) But of course, he was just another meat puppet; someone I took the time to study. He told me once that in order to keep his sex life alive (he had been married over 15 years) he would have his wife rotate a variety of wigs! For one sexy session she would be a red head, and for another sexy session she would be a brunette, or a blond. I remember looking at this man and trying very hard to keep a straight face. Having a very vivid imagination, I was whelmed by the imagery of his pathetic narrative. This man was obviously in a state of denial. And these are the men and women that marriage counselors shamelessly exploit. But it is only God who has revealed to me this great teaching: When that aspect of our relationship is over ... IT'S OVER! There is no other truth, and there can be no turning back. THE ENNUI IS THE END! At that point, the only options are to remain in the relationship, or to move on to greener pastures. But the wisdom I share with you here today is not widely promoted. Of course not! Otherwise, the greedy marriage counselors would have to find an honest occupation.
This is why I have remained single and sexy. I grew very tired of being made to play the role of the villain, simply for being what God hath created. I am a man, and so my sexual behavior is determined by my design. To condemn a man for his sexual nature is a condemnation of almighty God! This is another reason why women so easily succumb to my charms. Even though it breaks their hearts to know that they could never possess such an intelligent, and sexy man, they know that my love is real. I do not patronize, nor do I seek to subjugate the woman. I fulfill her wildest dreams, and then I am gone, like a thief in the night.
Her temporary "wildest dreams." For some reason, I (and maybe just me in the whole world) would like a friend for life. In the final analysis, sex wouldn't even be important. After all, after a certain amount it is "been there done that."
For you, (and most men?) sexual allure is everything. Thanks for your honesty. I hope girls, (those who are like me) are paying attention.
And don't have sex with a man until you are married. Otherwise, after the egg and the sperm eventually unite, you will be forced to
1. kill your child,
2. be a single mother, or
3. rely (unpatriotic-wise) on the government / People.
Because as you know, attempts at birth control CAN and WILL fail.
But of course, suit yourself, its a free country.
ha ha hah ha…. (That unpatriotic attitude is why we have so many problems today!)
Yes, that is a superior work of modern art. I have performed that song many times, and I subscribe to the message. They are of the superior intellect. But I see that you, as many others, cannot abstain from hyperbole. Sex is not everything in my life. Nor have I have I ever indicated such nonsense. I am more interested in art than I am sex. If you look at my YouTube channel or vist my SoundCloud channel, you will notice that I am a prolific songwriter, and a producer of short music videos. And what I have presented online is only a fraction of my overall output. I also have done quite well as a ghostwriter, which can be quite lucrative; the downside being you must legally forfeit any public recognition.
If sex were everything to me, I would be having sex right now, instead of corresponding with you! It is you who have focused on the sexual aspect of seduction. Seduction does not necessarily imply sexual intercourse, or any sexual activity at all. Here I have picked two of my songs for you to enjoy. They are both very different, and possess an anthemic quality. You must understand that I am on the cutting edge of a new art form that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. A man who simply thought about, sex, money, or fame would not follow such a muse.
Hand Me Down Easy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9kSOsIAwlM
Sweet Funky Love: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx7MUJQ38mk
An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good. It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants. The Federalist No. 1 Alexander Hamilton
Even then people did not want government.
Hamilton and all argued for a controlled govt. / a leadership working FOR the people.
* The govt. has become overbearing and we need take back control.
Under the Constitution ... not without it.
Indigenous people are 6℅ of the Worlds population. Spanning in 90 countries and represent 90℅of the cultural diversity hold 20℅ of the land mass on this planet. They control 80℅ of the plants and animal biodiversity. No wonder they are nature's Ultimate dream.
From building dozens of indigenous sculpture displays in theme parks and museums. Rediscovering these early civilization in North and South America could mean the actual survival of this planet from the clutches of the synthetic world.
well Good. What can we learn from them?
They taught us many new ways to farm and hunt.
The greatest threat to mankind is the damage we have done to the natural environment.
What we need more than anything is to relearn biodiversity, they are the greatest masters at it.
so many S words:
sin, sex, seduction, selfish, snake, satan
Self, salvation, solace
Jesus mentioned, in heaven there is no marriage.
Bring heaven to earth, he said.
He did not say seduce, be seduced.
(He was just looking out for our best interests, but we comprehend them not. For instance wouldn't you say making music or other creative pursuits is more fun than seducing / being seduced?)
No Kathryn. That is like saying water is better than green beans, or chimichangas. Both apples and oranges serve a purpose in this world. As I have mentioned in other words, we are in an ever changing universe; a state of flux. Even magnificent stars fade, and then turn into black holes. What it comes down to is this: People are afraid of growing old, because at the end of the rainbow there is no pot of gold, but only a funeral urn filled with ashes. Many cannot embrace the concept of immortality, and thus falsely believe in oblivion. I am here to restore faith.
And so, they cling to a relationship, not only as a means of financial security and comfort, but also as a means to generate "noise". Then , at least for a while, they cannot hear the march of death; the clear cadence and the steady beat, or feel chill that always approaches from the east.
Self Guided Free Will is one's birth right. Choosing what makes one happy is a personal matter. You can share what makes YOU happy and whoever agrees can benefit. As Jesus said, those who have ears to hear …
For instance, there is a 57 year old man who lives at the Ralph's complex up the street from me. He is homeless as he has wasted himself and abused his nervous system over the years. He is recovering, I think. The shop keepers let him sleep in a corner of the area with the justification that he can potentially act as a night watchman.
So, I see him on occasion when I shop there and chat. He has expressed great resentment over his father, (who was a high school PE coach) and has many issues left over from as young as five yrs. old!
This is a person who has seen great highs and great lows throughout the years. I was walking my dogs one day and he contemplated my pups saying: "You have some great friends there." He is right. My dogs are very devoted to me. My cat is also a very loyal and devoted friend. What is natural in the animal world seems so difficult in the human world. Why is that?
The cat, (all black w green eyes) is fed by my neighbor as well as by me. My neighbor tells me Rikki will not let her pet him. He is bonded to me because I have had him since he was young.
I have heard that some dogs when given to new owners die from heartbreak over loosing their original master.
My brother turned in his dog to the pound because the dog was causing so much trouble. My brother eventually went back and paid $200.00 to rescue his own dog. That is friendship and loyalty for you!
( PS the dog finally grew up, (the smarter dogs remain puppies longer,) and is now a great dog.)
Yes Kathryn, I also love the cute little animals. But we need to realize that they are essentially a captive audience, and we are feeding them. If I was always sitting on your lap, eating your good food, and sleeping in your warm bed, I think I would be your best friend too.
Improve Your Sex Life Through the Art of Seduction. Would this become a best seller? Probably.
Would I keep such a book? Depends on whether it delivers ...
This is what the seducer wants.
"Brass In Pocket" is one of the sexiest pop songs every recorded, and her delivery alone is enough to get you at least half-way up the mountain. She is very sexy in the video you posted, and if you have listened to much of her music, or read various interviews, you will understand that she is of a superior intellect. Of course, she has aged since then, but she has always had a very raw and aggressive sexuality, and I am still very attracted to her. I am sure that if she knew the sexy man, she would want to be with me.
Ohio (My City Was Gone): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W1PnI7QGS8
In India, I hear, early marriage is encouraged. Maybe there is something scientific and natural about marrying in early adult-hood when bonding to one's spouse is strong and deep. When naive romantic love is possible, when the beauty of youth still blooms and the water of early infatuation turns into wine as it ages. Maybe there was a (scientific) message when Jesus turned water into wine at the wedding.
Anyway, it is something to think about. Its too late for those of us who have totally blown it, but maybe the youth will benefit, if we elders encourage what is natural,
which I, for one, do ...
It is natural for animals to get along or create a bond. Their can recognize what they are as an species meaning without one another. The other wouldn't last. I seen many occasions where different breeds of animals got along and it wasn't always survival of the fittest.
On the contrary, humans are taught and persistent in staying in their ways and not trying to see the greater good. It always come down to a race or an particular ethnicity is superior than the next. Where it is completely false, we all came from the same orgin, just the thought process or behavior towards one another are taught differently.
Perhaps it is true that all humans originated from the black man in Africa. My studies have lead me to this conclusion. However, somewhere along the line, certain races, and nationalities did not become very sexy. For instance, I have friends who live in England. And being a musician I have always admired many of the musicians and bands that have come from that small island. Yet, it is well known that the English subjugated, and committed atrocities against the Irish for over 800 years, and they also set about the Earth seeking to subjugate the entire world! This is commonly known, and there have been other European countries as well, namely France and Spain who have sought world domination, and have participated in the evil of Colonialism. The Zionists also have this dream of domination, and many have suggested that they are at the head of it all.
And I do not believe that all races or nationalities would have necessarily taken the evil course of Colonialism given the opportunity. I have heard many Europeans suggest that my people were weak and backward, but if not for the biological weapon of smallpox that was used against us, we would have driven them back to Europa. Furthermore, many of the Indigenous First Nations who survived the smallpox sought for many years to be at peace with the Invaders. To seek harmony with those who have came uninvited to steal, murder, and destroy your world is not weakness, or savagery. On the contrary, it signifies a greater humanity. But the Invader's lust for land and resources was insatiable. They were like a herd of locust covering the land, and devouring everything in sight! Here is some information from MintPressNews that helps to illustrate the current Imperialist, and Colonialist aspirations of Israel and the United States.:
"...The US has provided more aid since Israel’s creation in 1948 – $250 billion adjusted for inflation – than to any other foreign country according to unclassified government figures adjusted for inflation. These figures do not include separate funding flows from state and municipal governments that Israel affinity organizations quietly lobby in order to provide even more aid to Israel. The quarter-trillion-dollar figure also excludes classified US federal government support.
American military and intelligence aid is now at “unprecedented” levels according to President Obama in a 2015 speech delivered at American University. If true, secret intelligence support may now have reached an additional $1.9-$13.2 billion annually depending on whether Obama adjusted for inflation..." http://www.mintpressnews.com/62-percent … el/215475/
It is remarkable that so much of the American taxpayer money has been spent on developing and maintaining a country that is only slightly larger than the state of New Jersey, the 5th smallest state in the U.S.!
Somewhere along the line between our emergence in Africa and the present, something went terribly wrong. And so it seems, this needs to be corrected. Raping, and pillaging, and murdering to satisfy an Imperialist ambition is not a very sexy thing to do. And anyone who agrees with such madness has forfeited their membership in the human race.
Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence
through diplomacy or
Its the violence and the forcefulness you hate. The injustice, the lack of love, compassion, non-exercise of the golden rule … sometimes in the name of religion.
Is there a way to address the injustice and suffering we caused the original inhabitants of this land or a way to rectify the past? What would they like?
The first thing they could do is to stop celebrating Columbus Day as a national Holiday. The accounts of his atrocities are well documented. This is no big secret. This is an outrage to all people, not just the Indigenous. And there were many great Italians who were not rapists, who were not murderers and who were not thieves! I have German blood, but I do not celebrate Adolf Hitler, as I despise such men. I will not provide a litany of the horrors here, but one of the most despicable things that Columbus did, was to force native people to turn their 9 year old daughters over to him to be used as concubines; little girls turned into sex slaves to satisfy the sick fantasies of his crew. Ending such a celebration of evil would be a good start. The passage of time will not make a wrong into a right. The least that could be done to honor the memory of those millions who suffered, and their descendants, is to not celebrate the murderer who raped, who tortured, and who killed them.
But what is most important is a re-distribution of wealth, beginning with a returning of stolen lands and resources to the Indigenous, and then following with reparations to the descendants of African slaves. But included in these would also be economic parity, and the ability to prosper without hindrance from a system of white supremacy. These needs should be addressed first, after which a re-distribution of wealth among the white majority should follow.
Many racists, and others who are sitting on the fence scream bloody murder whenever such issues are brought to the fore. They claim that we are living in a free society where everyone can succeed as long as they make an effort to do so. But this is just a convenient lie. First of all, as I have said before, Capitalism is nothing more than a giant ponzi scheme. In order for a few people to stay at the top, a certain number of the majority must remain in the middle, or at the bottom, and this is not very sexy. There is no other way it can work. Let's forget about minorities for a moment. There were masses of poor white people in 1776, and there have been masses of poor white people throughout the last 250 years, unto the present. If Capitalism truly worked for the majority, then poor white people in the United States would either be a very small minority, or simply non-existent. But we can clearly see just the opposite is true.
There is a great myth frequently used by the apologists that goes something like this: "Poor people (white and black) are just lazy! If they stopped expecting that the world owed them something, and got off their lazy butts, stopped drinking and using drugs, and did an honest days work, they would be able to rise above their condition!" And this is essentially how the ridiculous argument usually goes.
But now I will tell you what appears to be a very well kept secret. Most people want to stand on their own two feet. Most people "do not" want handouts or public assistance.They have dreams and ambitions they want to fulfill. They are not looking for a free ride, but are simply looking for an open door of opportunity, so that they can make their own way, and be self-sufficient. The way in which the system is currently structured does not allow for greater numbers to succeed, and the reason is as I stated before. If nobody is at the bottom, the pyramid falls down. And you can understand it also in the following manner: If everyone in the United States was a millionaire, then nobody would be rich! In order to have the rich you "must" have the poor. But in order to have economic parity you "do not" need the rich. This is why under this current Capitalist system, the minorities, the poor, and the working class whites will never achieve economic parity.
When we add the reality of white supremacy and racism to the mix, the situation we are in begins to appear even worse. The ruling elite are afraid of people like me. But we are under the protection of almighty God, and we are legion. I am teaching the world to be sexy. And there is no place in a sexy world for tyrants.
I understand you now. I watched your video about anarchy on You Tube. I am done mewing my pitiful tidbits of archaic and fanciful thoughts.
No-where has there been an anarchistic society. Why is that? THROUGHOUT TIME as far as we know. Always there are stronger men ready to be leaders. Some lead no matter what is going on because they were born with certain advantages. I am quite sorry but on this earth anarchy will not work. If you do not choose leaders they will choose themselves whether Y O U like it or not.
~ you think people will chip in of the goodness of their hearts to help one another, help feed the poor, care for the ill and the elderly. You think with their cell phones men and women will network to get roads built, etc. You think people will be able to defend themselves against those who take advantage of others for their own gain just because they can. You think women and children will just somehow have men around willing and able to defend them. You think leaders will not be needed and will not be created and supported? You think leaders will not be needed when Russia and China or whoever comes to wipe us out? Who will be in command of the tanks and the military men who will be needed in such defense? You think the goodness of human nature is strong and stable and that it is basically unfailing. If you think I am naive, think again ….
Anarchists are the naive ones.
Take a look at Our Federal Constitution. Freedom is the aim. Ever hear the word Liberty??? or the phrase "Give me liberty or give me death?" Anarchy cannot defend liberty. Our Constitution, rightly understood, does.
I do not know what you watched. But if you watched the video I provided , then you did not understand it. But you cannot expect to completely understand Anarchy without a certain amount of study. Many Americans have not read the U.S. Constitution. They do not understand the machinations of a two party system, or even the difference between an oligarchy and a democracy. We cannot expect to understand any political ideology simply at a glance. There are different kinds of democracies, and there is more than one Anarchist philosophy as well. You keep looking for a magic pill to imbue you with great knowledge, but there is no such pill. You will have to study like the rest of us if you truly want to know.
Until the Mercury and Apollo space programs, as far as we know, mortal man had never ventured into outer space with the aid of giant rocket ships. And so, for thousands of years someone like you could have been saying. "Men cannot go into outer space, or to the moon, as it has never been done in the history of the world!" "And if they could do it, why hasn't it already been done?" Just like they say,"There is a first time for everything!"
Furthermore, a system of Anarchy also operates with leaders and with a rule of law. You are still confusing Anarchy with chaos. And this confusion has been seeded by the tyrants of the world to confound the people. Anarchy simply means "without government". You can have leaders,and a rule of law without the government we have become accustomed to. Government exists solely to levy taxes and fines as a means to extort money from the citizens, and to manipulate and control the citizens in various ways for the enrichment of a ruling elite. In an Anarchist society, you simply would not have a central or state government forcing you to do things against your will, or to pay tribute under threat of punishment. Roads and bridges would still be built, criminals would still go to jail. And there would be a militia, or military force to protect the people from those who would seek to enslave them, as we are enslaved now.
In an Anarchist society, the tragedy in Flint Michigan would have never occurred, as the people living there in the city would have been in control of their own water supply, and they would not have been at the mercy of a state bureaucracy, state governor, or other indifferent state authorities; people who had everything to gain, and nothing to lose by cutting corners to save money. In an Anarchist society we would not be at the mercy of a government bent on Imperialist aggression and world domination. The people themselves would make their own decisions, and there would be no war machine , only a force to defend the people. In an Anarchist society we would not need "Black Lives Matter" because the Police would truly behave as servants of the people, as opposed to behaving as their masters. Citizens review boards consisting of members of the community would determine department policy, and would have the power to fire, fine, or imprison any law enforcement officer who betrayed the public trust. It would simply be a society controlled by the people, as opposed to a handful of tyrants.
Of course there would necessarily be a period of transition, but it not only can be done, it must be done if the citizens of the world ever hope to free themselves from the tyranny of world governments. You probably haven't listened to my audio-book, but I spent over two months of my life composing the soundtrack and putting it all together, and currently I have posted the entire audio-book online. It can be listened to in it's entirety for free, as I am demonstrating Anarchy in my own life. Even though I have posted it for free, there are a number of people who chose the option to purchase the book. And they did so because they received a benefit. At some point I may post it strictly for sale, but for the time being it is free. "From each according to his ability - To each according to their need". I am my brothers keeper. I am a sexy man.
http://wrenchbiscuit.blogspot.com/p/ana … obook.html
Constitutionalists and anarchists are not at odds. We also subscribe to freedom, independence, self-reliance and self-sufficiency and the right to bear arms to defend ourselves. I wish we could try out anarchy in a certain portion of the country to see what happens. I think eventually the anarchists would come to realize they would need the wisdom of The Constitution to bail themselves out of a chaotic mess.
What caused the miserable conditions of the early W i l d West? Or maybe you don't think they were so miserable.
Would you not say that the early Wild West was anarchy? Where the only "law" was that provided by your own rifle? Where settlers took land the Indians needed, where the big ranchers controlled the towns and miners lost their mines (and lives) to claim jumpers? Was that not anarchy in operation?
In reference to the "big ranchers" what you are referring to is more akin to a fiefdom:
the estate or domain of a feudal lord. 2. Informal. anything, as an organization or real estate, owned or controlled by one dominant person or group.
A fiefdom is more akin to a Fascist state than Anarchy. In an Anarchist society the people are governed by laws,rules, and regulations just as we are today. But there is no government to demand and levy taxes, impose a draft, or any other conditions that might result in punitive actions against the citizen.
As far as claim jumpers : you are referring to Chaos, and lawlessness. Criminal activity would be handled by law enforcement and a justice system in the Anarchist society.
Interesting thread about anarchy. But, I must say, as sexy as you proclaim to be, I have yet to be convinced of either the truth of your statement that you could show anyone how to improve their sex life.
You have some interesting thoughts on anarchy, hatred and leadership, and I respectfully disagree with most of what you say.
Thanks for writing though. It seems like an interesting statement. And you seem to have a lot to say.
Yes, Thank You! It is an interesting topic, multi-faceted, and very sexy. It is unfortunate that so many must live and die this way, when they are holding the key to their salvation in the palm of their hand. But even on the day that they are born, they are branded with a number, and transformed from a human being into a commodity. Out of frustration, I have mocked the timidness and the complacency of the majority. But in all fairness, how could a little bird who has lived his entire life in a cage understand the freedom of flight; unencumbered, and soaring up into the heavens? But since I do understand, I must be a very strange bird indeed.
For most part Jesus was an anarchist, except the part where he wants your soul.
Even though I think WB dose not know what he talking about with number of sexual partners and his IQ. Then when you disagree with him. he accuses you of slandering and jealousy of him, which nonsense.
I do agree with much of WB history and anarchy knowledge. I did a pirates museum in Florida and had main feature of Columbus who started North Americas gold rush, slavery, Christainity , piracy and genocide of native people.
I thought he was being factious, and that's how I take him...with a grain of salt.
I'll tell you right up front: Too much salt in your diet is not good, especially if you suffer from high blood pressure. Many people are incredulous when they encounter something mysterious and challenging for the first time. They are inclined not to believe, simply because they do not have a point of reference.
I have encountered many women who are shocked, and dismayed, when they discover I am not interested in them sexually. Women who consider themselves to be beautiful have an especially hard time with this. They cannot believe that a sexy man like me would refuse their hot and sexy invitation. Young women dream about sexy men like me. But I must be true to myself, I have always preferred the older women. Furthermore,I prefer the more full figured woman; a woman with wide hips, a big bosom, a protruding Buddha belly,and a fondness for cooking sweet meats and other tasty tidbits.
"I do not know what you watched. But if you watched the video I provided , then you did not understand it. But you cannot expect to completely understand Anarchy without a certain amount of study. Many Americans have not read the U.S. Constitution. They do not understand the machinations of a two party system, or even the difference between an oligarchy and a democracy. We cannot expect to understand any political ideology simply at a glance. There are different kinds of democracies, and there is more than one Anarchist philosophy as well. You keep looking for a magic pill to imbue you with great knowledge, but there is no such pill. You will have to study like the rest of us if you truly want to know."
I posted YOUR video:
All can watch what I watched. All can see this video does NOT explain how GOOD leaders will come about. You really don't have to come across as you do. So DEFENSIVE, so criticizing, so hateful and so DISDAINFUL. How do you really plan to attract supporters???
Perhaps we HAVE come to a time in this society based on technological advances involving communication/networking capabilities where a new form of governing is feasible. The video talked about the cell phone. It did not mention the PC!!!! Perhaps we have come to a point in time when mankind IS good enough, smart enough, compassionate enough, to adopt anarchy as prescribed by YOU.
However, if you have noticed, you are not being the kind of person we would want to lead us into it. You might want to think about that.
~~~~~>If there are no more politicians who care about us and our liberty then we may be forced to study, contemplate and CONSIDER what you are talking about.<~~~~
But look at the comment of Ms Bejabbers. "I thought he was being factious, and that's how I take him...with a grain of salt." You have turned her off.
(I remember relishing the brief interval of time when Bush had left the White house and Obama had not entered it yet. It was a about six minutes. And I did relish it.)
Maybe we need a new word for the system of government you are actually in the process of designing. The word Anarchy is tainted. As it stands, (and you don't help much,) it brings forth anger and resentment: a total turn off. Civilized people do not whoop and holler like the original people here did on their horses wearing their war paint to settle disputes. No, we come from a civilized society of very deep thinkers. Maybe you need to embrace that side of yourself to deliver this new way which could be the way of the future for the civilized men, women and children of this country. (But I do think discounting The Constitution is grave folly.)
PS Good teachers / leaders encourage. They do not flaunt themselves, criticize and demean. Just to let you know. Its okay to behave like John the Baptist, but you are not doing that at this point. You are mostly demeaning. But carry on. What is good for this site is good for this site.
< "But what is most important is a re-distribution of wealth, beginning with a returning of stolen lands and resources to the Indigenous, and then following with reparations to the descendants of African slaves. But included in these would also be economic parity, and the ability to prosper without hindrance from a system of white supremacy. These needs should be addressed first, after which a
*re-distribution of wealth among the white majority should follow.* ">
WHY and HOW?
(You are really shocking!)
What should really happen is this:
We all go back to our original countries. I will go back to Scotland, Joan will go back to Africa, Amir will go back to Turkey. Joe will go back to Italy. Yes, one by one we will go back to whence we came. We will give back the land to the original people we stole it from. OKAY?????
Someone suggested that they always take my words with a grain of salt. But please, they can take my words with,50,or 100 grains, or even an entire bag. This will not shape my destiny, nor will it erase the beautiful memories of the lucky women who have come my way, and who have had the presence of mind to recognize a golden opportunity.What do I care if a man denies the sunrise, or the sunset, when I am standing here with baited breath, staring straight into the crack of dawn?
Behold the way of the sexy man. This is why women fall down at my feet, like the juicy fruit that falls from the peach, the pear, and the persimmon tree. But I cannot let them lie there too long, as they will begin to rust. So I must be quick about my business, while being careful to push all of the right buttons. God has given me these talents, and so I shall use them, as only God has validated my purpose.
Here is a sexy poem I wrote today. It is about plastic people offering condolences. What more can I give you, when I have nothing but love to give?
BTW I hope the link explains these issues in depth:
http://wrenchbiscuit.blogspot.com/p/ana … obook.html
<"In an Anarchist society, … Roads and bridges would still be built, criminals would still go to jail. ... there would be a militia, or military force to protect the people from those who would seek to enslave them, as we are enslaved now.
But what is most important is a re-distribution of wealth, beginning with a returning of stolen lands and resources to the Indigenous, and then following with reparations to the descendants of African slaves.
But included in these would also be economic parity, and the ability to prosper without hindrance from a system of white supremacy.
These needs should be addressed first, after which a re-distribution of wealth among the white majority should follow.
Capitalism is nothing more than a giant ponzi scheme."> wB
People will not follow the link because many are dimwitted and slow. But if I was giving away 100 dollar bills, or a new car, they would all be standing in line. Throw the dog a bone, and he will surely fetch it.
What is most interesting about this thread is how it exposes the mindset of the majority. Here, I have offered free of charge, something that is actually priceless. I have offered something that sex therapists, marriage counselors and other "specialists", will only offer at a very high price. Yet, they rarely deliver. Rather than asking important questions about their own sexuality, and how they can improve their sex life, many have focused on my delivery , and my sexy style. The main thrust has been to challenge my authority, and to assassinate my character. And to what end? I have had an active sex life since the age of 14. And I continue to engage in sexual activity whenever I please. In fact, this Thursday I have scheduled a sexual encounter with a beautiful and mature woman. After attending to her needs, I will trim her palmetto trees. Apparently, it is alarming to some that I would be so bold as to acknowledge my good fortune.
Rather than asking questions of a provocative and sexual nature, or sharing their own stories of conquest, and sexual fulfillment, they have satisfied themselves by insisting that I must be a pretender. In their twisted way of thinking, they argue that people who are truly sexy, and truly intelligent, do not see a need to boast about it, or to convince anyone of their superiority. But Donald Trump is the perfect contradiction to such nonsense. He is a handsome man, and he is filthy rich! He has no need to boast, or to convince anyone of anything. His accomplishments, and his bank account speak for themselves. So why does he do it? Why does he puff himself up in public? I will tell you why, and this is a great teaching. He brags on himself because he can! He boasts about his accomplishments because it makes him feel good. He has delivered a great teaching to the world but many are too ignorant to see it. In his behavior he is telling the people to lift up their heads and to stop looking down at their feet. I will not vote for Donald Trump, but neither will I throw the baby out with the bathwater.
A man cannot be sexy without being self-confident. A man who is afraid to acknowledge his greatness is no man at all, and not worthy of a woman's consideration. This is why the cock crows in the morning. He is asserting himself and his masculinity. He is shouting to the world,"Look at me! I am here! Now deal with it!" And it does not matter when the farmer comes calling with a butcher knife, lops off the little red roosters head, and then throws him in the pot. The little rooster will know that he was sexy unto the very end!
You really are shocking wrenchBiscuit: If this is your aim you have been successful, in my estimation:
<"And I continue to engage in sexual activity whenever I please. In fact, this Thursday I have scheduled a sexual encounter with a beautiful and mature woman. After attending to her needs, I will trim her palmetto trees. Apparently, it is alarming to some that I would be so bold as to acknowledge my good fortune."> wB
cocks in the barnyard behave in this manner.
(cock 1 a male bird, esp. a rooster.)
But it sounds like bartering in this case. "After attending to her needs, I will trim her palmetto trees." (you can bet her top priority is trimming those trees.)
Was America built on this type of bartering?
Is this type of bartering part of Anarchy?
If so, you can keep it.
No thank you, very much.
Most gents prefer ladies to have trimmed their palmetto trees beforehand.
Disco Sex and Good Vibrations
Once again someone has taken my words and created their own narrative. Like most Americans, it appears that you are accustomed to being around so-called "modest" people. But I understand that modesty is most often false modesty. The sheer number of "selfies" that we see in many Facebook posts, and on other social media sites, is a testament to the passive narcissism that we see all around us. And I say it is passive because they do not come out and express their love for themselves in their commentary. But such love is evidenced in their incessant posting of images.
Currently, I have only three images of myself posted online. I understand that the intellect is the sexiest thing about the human. A man or a woman may be physically attractive, yet dumb as an ox. There is nothing sexy about an ox! This is why I do not have sex with women who possess a low IQ. Such behavior is improper and disgusting, and it is only one short step away from bestiality. Of course, I do not have an "IQ meter", but there is a way to judge the intelligence of a woman through observation; not only by listening to what she says, but by listening also for what she "does not" say. This is very easy to do. And so I reveal, yet another great teaching:
When I was younger and living in New York, I went to a local disco with the intention of seducing a female. But I digress: (Of course I went alone, and the younger men reading this should take note that it is always best to fly solo when looking for females. Often young male lions will travel in pairs to hunt for females, but we are not wild beasts, and the human female is not comfortable with men who run in packs. It is always best to approach them alone.)
The disco-tech was located in a very large building, and consisted of 2 levels. The dance floor was huge, and the upper level was open in the middle, and outlined the perimeter of the dance floor. As was often the case, when I entered the vast meat market; bass frequencies throbbing to the sounds of Prince and Michael Jackson, I was inebriated with the smell of sex, alcohol, and the faint,sweet odor of cannabis. These were glorious days I will never forget.
While standing at the bar nursing a rum and coke, I became engaged in conversation with a very sexy female. I immediately sized her up as a materialistic moron, but I wanted to be sure, since she was so physically attractive. At the time, I was operating a recording studio with a friend of mine, while also working as a professional musician. I knew that if I told her the truth about my occupation, she would most likely be impressed, as women often were. But I made a bet with myself. I bet that if I told her I worked at a menial occupation, she would soon disappear. Of course, I won the bet! I told her I was a janitor at a local hospital, and although I had done such work in the past to make ends meet, it was not my primary means of employment. Shortly after I told her I was a janitor, I looked around and she was nowhere to be found! She had completely disappeared into a sweaty, pulsating sea of humanity.
I do not have time for such ignorant materialistic females; not when there are intelligent and sexy females available. Of course, the ignorant females are always in the majority, and so the sexy man must look a little harder to find a woman who is worthy of his attention. Also we must not forget that intelligence is not only measured by scholastic achievement, or how well someone can add, subtract, and multiply, but also by an individuals ability to separate the important things in life from the superficial,and the trivial pursuits.
Concerning your fiction about "barter": It is you who have created the fiction that I have bartered for sex. I did not indicate such a thing. And besides, women have begged me to have sexual relations with them in the past, and as I have also explained, some have even forced themselves upon me! But I do not consider their actions to be a matter of sexual assault. Who can really blame them for wanting a real man; the kind of man that is as rare as a Tazmanian Peacock?
No I do not have to barter for the kind affections of the female. I am trimming her palmetto as she is a mature woman, and so she is not physically able to perform such a demanding task. She is a beautiful woman, with a very hot temper, as she is a redhead. When she was younger she was offered the chance to pose for a Playboy centerfold, but her father found out and would not allow it. Sex notwithstanding, I am a kind person, and I am also a man of God. It is my duty to help her, whatever her needs may be. You have attempted to sully my good works with a terrible fiction. But because I care for you, I am not offended, and so, I will only send good vibrations.
Thanks for the good vibrations, even though you think I have offended you by "sullying your good intentions." In the interest of looking out for your best interests I advise you to test this chick-a-dee as well. Tell her you do not have time to trim her trees. See how she reacts.
First of all, if you read my post you will see that I clearly stated that I was "not offended". Furthermore, I do not need to test your theory, as I already know the outcome. She would not care if I postponed the trimming of the palmetto. In fact, trimming the palmetto was my idea, not hers. But as far as attending to her intimate needs, I dare not tease her, as this would bring about a raging fury that I have witnessed on many occasions.Please, it is not unusual for me to provoke an argument. I have always enjoyed a good tongue lashing from a beautiful woman. I find it to be great sport, and quite invigorating. After all, in spite of being a sexy man, I am also a provocateur.
And this is a very important lesson. It is foolish, and even dangerous to endear yourself to a hot blooded, and temperamental woman, only to later deny her the "goodness", and the satisfaction she has come to expect, and so richly deserves. A man should never do such a foolhardy thing, especially with a red head, as they are the most temperamental, jealous, and possessive. Before breaking the bond with such a woman, it is best to discreetly change your address, and then vanish, like a thief into the night.
Perhaps you should recognize good solid helpful advice when it is offered rather than seeing it as "offense." You completely misunderstand where I am coming from, but I am quite used to this type of reaction by now. Common sense and common decency, it turns out, are not so common. However, if I see one more wretched poem with a "death to offender" type message I shall never offer my wisdom to you again. EVER These last two poem submissions are very inappropriate. They are ban-able offenses if you ask me.
PS I think it is very miserable of you to say:
Whoever is nice to me
without agreeing with me
No Kathryn, what is most offensive, is the people who claim to champion free speech , and then seek to suppress it at every turn. I am free, and there is nothing that anyone in this world can do about it. Let the world marvel at how I have once again exposed the hypocrisy of the American mainstream.
In fact, to protect myself, I shall cease posting here. Good bye.
Most people are aware of mainstream media and Government lies, murderers and corruptions. What they don't know is what to do about It.
The answer for myself to move to Bolivia and be self sustainable with natives and encourage my entire family to move with me. The general karma of people with run over the Dogma of greedy gang in time as they have throughout human history.
A terrible storms of America collapses is upon you WB , ? is, what are your answers for safety for youself and your circle?
Education and Knowledge are my weapons of choice, and these are the only weapons which can prevail against this insidious evil; an evil force that now permeates our entire existence. And there is safety in vast numbers of people who are educated. I have already provided over 26,800 words on this thread.These 26,800 words can lead to a greater understanding. What you can also gather here is a wealth of information from others as well.
I have also provided links to information that can help educate and enlighten those who seek to grow. Here is even more information. Each and every American citizen, even if they are as dumb as an ox, should at least attempt to read written works, and to listen to lectures and speeches provided by the following authors, and by doing so they will begin to see the true shape of the world they are living in. Until a majority realize the true shape of the world, they will not be motivated to seek change.
A Few Selected Authors and Speakers:
These are just some of the great people I have studied. They have only increased my awareness, and have helped me to see the shape of the world.
Ida B Wells
Henry David Thoreau
Bartolome de las Casas
Vine Deloria Jr.
Words won't matter when they come for you. If you think there are too many zombies and robots now, wait until you physically experience the slavery they have in store for you next. Even with a my fighting and survival and permaculture skills. I would be on their kill list anyways for no good reason and could not handle the suffering about to come.
They cannot kill me. What you are talking about is a system that is being controlled by talking monkeys who do not have a clue. There is a failsafe here in the Earth: a mechanism that evil world governments simply cannot override. We do not control Nature, as we are subordinate to God, and Nature. This ignorance and evil has only lasted a few thousand years, and it will soon pass away. Any harm they may inflict is only temporary. Further along the time-line, you will find that these kingdoms and squatter nations are far less than a memory.
These talking monkeys from when I young were alright only paid $45 a month for an apartment and made $20 an hour. Today 500pound apes have disallowed our wages to go up since the. Mean wail our basic cost of living has gone up more than 10 times.
Have you just ignored what most top economions have been warning of the dollar collapse and military and nuke build up. The most private debt and national debt for most of us can never pay yet must pay one way or another.
Yes it may pass after ten or 15 years of suffering first as I have had clear dreams about.
I have ignored nothing. Yes, evil men are not sexy like me, and they have created a great misery in the world. But they are not omnipotent, and can be likened to a life threatening disease. When we consider such a disease, we understand that it can only move in one of two directions. The disease will be sent into remission and the patient will recover, or the disease will become terminal and the patient will die. Either way the patient wins, as both options allow the patient to renew himself either physically or spiritually. It is the same with the greater man, or mankind.
God has created us to move toward perfection, and I am an example of the superior man. If the majority is unable to move in this direction, then the disease that has manifested itself through violence,indifference, materialism, and capitalism, will ultimately destroy the host. If it goes to that extreme, then the greater man will either be redesigned and set back into motion, or this particular model will be discontinued. And so, there is good reason to struggle against the machine if our goal is to preserve the human race, but if we should fail, it is not the end of the world. Just like the extinction of the Dodo bird, it will be a loss that the universe will easily sustain.
When you are incapable of having immense pleasure with your soul mate, it’s really a high time for you and your partner that make a sense of guilt about your inability to participate in physical activity. The problem may be because of soft erection that does not offer sufficient rigidity. This is commonly known as erectile dysfunction or simply impotency that affects most of the men, especially the people of middle age or people who are above 50 years of age.
Men who suffer from erectile dysfunction are not sexy men. They are usually good providers, and function primarily as a pack animal. It is these type of men who commonly fall prey to sex therapists, marriage counselors, and other opportunists who exploit their weakness. Except for those who truly are suffering from a physical disability, I am confident that the majority of such men are suffering from a mental illness.
You have expressed the notion of a "soul mate" , and it is this very notion that leads many men down the path to erectile dysfunction. Such men are living in a world of make believe. In the west, this notion has been encouraged through a religious perversion of nature. And that perversion invariably finds it's way into the bedroom.
The concept of a soul mate is just as appealing as Willy Wonka, Snow White, Mary Poppins, or any number of fairy tales, but it is a fiction that can also put out the fire quicker than a bucket of water and a Jimmy Swaggart Compilation on DVD. In a nation of over 300 million people, over half of which are female, it is absurd to suggest that there is a woman so special that no other can compare! Yes, this is a romantic notion that plays well at the movies, but in the real life, there are any number of partners that a man may be compatible with, and vice versa. A prostitute will tell you that the majority of her customers are married men. And the reason for this is very simple. These are men who for various reasons wish to continue their marriage, but who also want an exciting sex life. It is not possible to have an exciting sex life with the same man, or woman, over the course of a lifetime. And the human body will always tell us when something is wrong. A person who smokes cigarettes will at some point begin to cough. This is the body alerting the smoker of a dangerous situation. Erectile dysfunction often serves the same purpose, and this condition is simply telling the man that it is time to seek a new partner.
If this were not true, men would not have mistresses, or seek the kind and loving affections of a prostitute. But a sexy man requires neither a mistress or a prostitute, as he accepts the will of God. Many have sought to pervert the will of God with religious dogma. But the truth is hardwired in our design. When a married man begins to suffer chronic erectile dysfunction, he should by all means consult with a physician. But if he is found to be physically fit, then he must accept the inevitable ennui. Here is a good rule of thumb: When Mr. Johnson goes south, a man can either follow, or learn to live without.
I agree the disease will kill the host, in about 10 to 15 years. Meanwhile in Bolivia the high risk of struggling too much or suffering won't be so bad.
I"m too sexy for suffering.... too sexy for suffering and I'm too sexy for death by far.
by Anamika S Jain 8 years ago
How to improve Sex life?
by deecoleworld 5 years ago
Define a woman who sleeps with a lot men. Now define a man who does the same? What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a woman? What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a man? What do you think of these labels? What about your personal experiences?
by insanebutright 7 years ago
Here's the deal.For the women who withhold intimacy to see if the guy will respect you for "who you are" instead of as an 'intimacy object' which he can then seek from other girls once he gets it from you...How is he going to respect you for 'who you are' when you withhold intimacy?No...
by Gizmo Prodigy Publishing 3 years ago
Its very stuck up when a lot of women put this image on a man thats hes always wrong and shes right.
by freecampingaussie 3 years ago
Sex is supposed to be enjoyable for both the Man & woman . Why don't so many females enjoy it ?I was really surprised when I read a hub the other day & all the comments that indicated that a lot of females do not enjoy sex, talk about putting up with it ? I prefer it to shopping well ,...
by These eyes 2 years ago
Why do men hurt the person they love? If they love a woman why they do crazy things?I have a good relationship with this man and he just admit that he was having an affair that he wants to continue seing that person. I never see this coming since everything was so great with us. We never have a big...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|