jump to last post 1-10 of 10 discussions (72 posts)

Why Men love Women (Erotically)?

  1. profile image0
    PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago

    Except from the erotic-factor, what else is there? Buddha left home, and after he gained Enlightenment, advised everybody to say away from women ... .... was he another blind man establishing his subjective prejudice upon the world?

    1. CyclingFitness profile image90
      CyclingFitnessposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      The flowing nature of their body in contrast with ours and the pure difference within them.

      It may be within man's constant need for acceptance.

      It's true that a bad woman can lead a good man astray.

      1. Disturbia profile image61
        Disturbiaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        That's a bunch of crap.  No one can lead anyone astray unless they are a willing party to being lead.  A truly good man would not be lead astray.

        1. CyclingFitness profile image90
          CyclingFitnessposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          No- a weak man can be led astray very easily.

          And that is irrespective of him being a good man or not!

        2. Daniella Lopez profile image87
          Daniella Lopezposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          You can't force the willing... lol/

    2. Felixedet2000 profile image56
      Felixedet2000posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Remember that women were specially design and prepared for the enjoyment of men, yes women do make men to be high just like drugs. But when you want to do away with the addiction that comes via women, you abstain totally from them otherwise you'll be consumed by them.

      1. couturepopcafe profile image61
        couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        I'm not even going to touch this one.

      2. profile image0
        PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        Are you a psychologist or something? roll

        1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
          Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          I think you got the psych part right but it ends at the first o.

          1. profile image0
            PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Is that a joke? roll

    3. Dave Mathews profile image60
      Dave Mathewsposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      There is a gigantic difference between loving someone and being in love with someone. Being in love should translate to being in "LUST" with someone. It is not until we can get past the lust, that real love comes into the picture.

      1. profile image0
        PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        And what is  'that real love' Dave? roll

        1. couturepopcafe profile image61
          couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          ISTG you sound like the computer in War Games.

          1. profile image0
            PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            And you sound like a virus in the harddisk sad

            1. couturepopcafe profile image61
              couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

              Sorry, I was just referring to the way the computer talked to Dave in War Games.  Nothing personal.

    4. cenabcn1 profile image57
      cenabcn1posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      lolz

  2. Greek One profile image77
    Greek Oneposted 5 years ago

    they smell nice and are soft

    some can make a mean casserole... and others know how to raise your children

  3. Disturbia profile image61
    Disturbiaposted 5 years ago

    I think it's biology and the natural instinct needed for the survival of the species.

    1. ajayshah2005 profile image74
      ajayshah2005posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      I agree. It is a natural phenomena and also for the continuity of human existence on the earth.

    2. profile image0
      PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Good reply...scientific...though we still don't know what 'biological life' is. But does your point make Buddha's ideas invalid? That is...what if a man chooses to remain celibate throughout his life - isn't that a good choice?

      1. couturepopcafe profile image61
        couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        Buddha was very simply denying the flesh so he could concentrate on the higher plane of the spirit.  Nothing weird or mysterious there.  However, as the saying goes, it's easy to be a holy man sitting on top of a mountain.

        1. profile image0
          PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          So you are saying that the 'higher plane of the spirit' exists? Who said flesh has anything to do with mountains?

          1. profile image0
            PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            "Flesh is only and only important to those dogs who can not control it."

          2. couturepopcafe profile image61
            couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Yes, IMO the higher plane of spirit exists.  The reference to the mountain means that Buddha separated himself from others so as to meditate on what is.  It would have been far more difficult to do this had he stayed within the community surrounded by people who might otherwise influence his quest.

  4. stclairjack profile image81
    stclairjackposted 5 years ago

    because light loves the dark,... silence loves the loud,... sand loves the sea,... because life is ballance,... and woman ballances man.

    1. skyfire profile image73
      skyfireposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Eh ? neutral

      1. Greek One profile image77
        Greek Oneposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        I.E. our ying loves their yang

        1. couturepopcafe profile image61
          couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          I think it's the other way around.  Your the one with the ...yang.

          1. Greek One profile image77
            Greek Oneposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            ...lost it when i said 'i do'

      2. stclairjack profile image81
        stclairjackposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        it was just a bit of prose,... my romatic slipped out for a sec,... i real it back in and put it away.

        men love it,.... IT,... they aso like clean socks and cheese burgers.

  5. Greek One profile image77
    Greek Oneposted 5 years ago

    ... and don't forget the casserole

  6. skyfire profile image73
    skyfireposted 5 years ago

    Thanks. For the first time i missed Confucius type of post.

    1. stclairjack profile image81
      stclairjackposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      i am confucious now?,.... cool,.... an upgrade.

  7. skyfire profile image73
    skyfireposted 5 years ago

    lol

  8. cat on a soapbox profile image83
    cat on a soapboxposted 5 years ago

    In addition to sex, food, and offspring,I think men appreciate being needed in ways that balance the attributes of women. A man will often feel emasculated by an extremely strong-willed woman or trapped by a constant nag. Erotically, men love women because we are warm, soft, curvaceous, and mysterious. Women also have complex natural scents/tastes that attract men.

    1. couturepopcafe profile image61
      couturepopcafeposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      The same reasons they love a hot New York pretzel from a street vendor.

  9. Chaotic Chica profile image76
    Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago

    The 'christian' or 'religious' view on this is simply that that is the way God intended it to be; that he made woman for man, to entertain him (so to speak) and be his partner.

    The 'physics' view on this has to do with pheremones and hormones and the biology of humans as animals.  When everything boils down to the basics, we may be 'higher thinking' and 'higher functioning' (the credit so often belonging to that all-important opposable thumb) but we are indeed animals.  Men love women for the same reason women love men, it is necessary for species survival.

    The question you seem to be asking has less to do with attraction then in attempting to find validity in celibacy.  With a population threatening to overwhelm this Earth and a rampant spreading of so many viruses and STDs there are more pros to remaining sexually innocent than there are cons.  Whether or not that is a 'good choice' is a matter of personal opinion. 

    That said there is a reason so many monks, or other celibate societies, tend to establish living compounds in remote locations.  It is due to an effort to distance themselves from the temptations natural within themselves.  In other words, there is nothing wrong celibacy but your body will betray your mind when given the proper circumstances.

    *disclaimer~there are plenty of men whom embody the characteristics of a 'siren', leading astray an innocent woman despite herself.

    1. profile image0
      PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      "... but we are indeed animals"

      Can you tell me what is this thing that you call 'animal'?

      1. profile image0
        PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        If you don't know the definition of 'animal', then overthrow that idea.

      2. Chaotic Chica profile image76
        Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

        An animal by definition is any living organism, excluding plants and bacteria. Specifically, we are mammals whick, by definition, are any of a large class of warm blooded, sometimes hairy,  verebrates whose offspring are fed with milk secreted   by the female mammary glands.

        All animals essentialy follow the sam basic perameters when reproductive maturity has been reached, that being the standard goal of find a suitable mate and repopulate the species.  The only difference with humans is that we have the luxury of higher thinking though we do not always use it.
        And in regards to the time delay in geting back to you, it was not due to lack of understanding of what I wrote, as you seem to be insinuating, rather a call to responsiblity as I  had work to do.
        Additionally, an a brutish, debased, or inhuman person is referred to as an animal.

        1. Greek One profile image77
          Greek Oneposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          why does this post turn me on????

          1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
            Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            Perhaps you find intelligent thought processes stimulating.  Or perhaps your baser mammalion instincts are homing in on the mammaries...I 'll let you use your higher thinking to figure it out. wink

            1. Greek One profile image77
              Greek Oneposted 5 years ago in reply to this

              yeah.. i would go with the mammaries theory

              1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
                Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                Yeah, I kind of thought so.! big_smile

        2. Chaotic Chica profile image76
          Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          Please excuse my grammarical errors, my laptop has  crased and I  am using my son's tablet. I am not yet used to typing this way.  smile

        3. profile image0
          PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

          I genuinely appreciate you Chaotic Chica, for this reply. Thank you that you replied.

          I might have asked you what is this thing called  'living organism'; but leave that for another day!

          1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
            Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            I would say that a basic definition of living organism would be any living creature or being with an internal structure of organs and parts that work together to maintain it's life, without which it would cease to live.

            1. profile image0
              PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

              "to maintain it's life"   -Can you define this thing that you call here 'life'?

              1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
                Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                Life is the property that distinguishes plants and animals from inrganic manner, specifically the cellular biochemichal activity characterized by the ingestion of nutrients, the storage anduse of energy, the excretion of wastes, growth, repeoduction, etc.
                And yes, this time I decided to get you the Webster definition  smile

                1. profile image0
                  PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                  Does that definition say exactly what is the difference between a stone, and a human being?

                  1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
                    Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                    Well, unless a stone excretes waste and reproduces, I am fairly certain that the above mentioned Webster defintion clarifies the difference.  smile

                2. profile image0
                  PhenomWriterposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                  To put it simply - I want to make a dead human being alive. How can I implant life into his body again?

                  1. Chaotic Chica profile image76
                    Chaotic Chicaposted 5 years ago in reply to this

                    See Mary Shelley's Frankenstien.

  10. boby325 profile image61
    boby325posted 5 years ago

    I think god has given this feature to the men to keep His world full of human being. If the men had not any erotic feelings to women, no new life would born.

    1. ikechiawazie profile image59
      ikechiawazieposted 5 years ago in reply to this

      Women were created not just to help men but TO BE LOVED BY MEN. Its one mystery that you can only ask God

 
working