Why are you angry about Christians preaching?

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (59 posts)

83
Don Wposted 11 years ago
When someone is passionate about a cause, they try to persuade others to join it. Indeed that's often what demonstrates they are passionate about it. So why shouldn't Christians who are passionate about their cause, try to persuade people to join that cause, just like political parties, charities, businesses, environmentalists, advertisers and anyone else with something to promote? And why shouldn't Christians lobby politicians to ensure their interests are considered like any other social group?
reply report
1. 59
  Mark Knowlesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Do they want to start burning witches again? Or just make abortions and divorce illegal?
  reply report
  61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Burn the Brits, too!
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No idea. But whatever is on their agenda, they have to go through the same social mechanisms as anyone else, i.e. public opinion, political process etc. Those mechanisms are also open to those who disagree with the Christian agenda.
  reply report
2. 80
  pennyofheavenposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  A third of them might like your cause, a third of them might not, another third might not care either way. So what is the problem?
  reply report
3. 60
  Dustin Staplesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's all the sensationalism that bothers me. Specifically needing to evoke emotion to make a point; it's expected of politicians and marketers, but those fields aren't based off ethics. Sensationalism is used to be logically incosistant or obfuscatory for a point that is not sound enough to be based out of logic alone. It's the difference between an Evangelist (whose preaching i dread) and a Sheperd (whose preaching I admire), as defined here: <link snipped>
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Emotion sells. Advertisers learned that long ago. That's why they don't sell you a sports car. They sell you the chance to be a racing driver that you always dreamed of when you were 9.
  
  Sensationalism is also prevalent in politics. I'm guessing you saw the election that just happened, right?
  reply report
4. 0
  Emile Rposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I think it irritates me because Christians pretend to speak for a cosmic power. You read a book and suddenly you are the Metatron, in your own mind.
  reply report
5. 58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Unlike your other examples, Christians don't attempt to persuade, they state quite emphatically they are commanded by God to demand you become Christian or else your everlasting soul will burn for an eternity.
  
  Is that really the same thing?
  reply report
  61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You can'rt generalize that way. It is unrealistically bigoted.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Your behavior here does not preclude the generalization, it supports it.
  reply report
  61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  There is a lot of that going around.
  reply report
  72
  getitriteposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  More like Al Qaeda.
  reply report
  60
  Dustin Staplesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's nearly the same thing, except religion has more sensationalism. I need to listen to some loving god who has demanded that I follow him, or i'm sentecned to an eternity in hell?
  I need to be afraid of what's going to happen, rather than rationally conclude that following God is reasonable.
  It's like telling me I need to buy a jacket because i'm scared of not fitting in, versus realizing I need one because it's cold outside.
  reply report
  59
  Mark Knowlesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Especially when it is warm and sunny outside.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  This.
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Sure the message is different, but the techniques are the same. Political parties, advertisers, charities, news media, corporations and other groups all use people's fears, sympathies, aspirations etc. to sell their 'product'. Christianity is no different. Why should Christians be singled out for this behaviour?
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Simple, we can find hard evidence to refute or accept anything claimed by political parties, advertisers, etc. There is nothing Christians have other than their good book.
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I can't buy that. Claims that can't be substantiated with hard evidence, or even false claims, are often made by one group or another, whether it be political parties, corporations or advertisers. Why does there seem to be less tolerance for Christians making unsubstantiated claims?
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Excuse me? You don't accept the fact that if for example, an advertiser claims a product can do something, we can't find hard evidence to know whether or not the product works? Or, if a politician claims they can lower taxes, can we not see hard evidence to the contrary when taxes go up?
  
  What is it you're not buying here?
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm not buying that the availability of hard evidence is the reason people seem more tolerant of corporations, charities, political parties lobbying, advertising and promoting their messages. I'm wondering why people seem less bothered about insidious messages telling them to buy things they don't need, and more bothered by someone preaching to them about Christianity. Evidence suggests allowing corporations to influence public policy too much for their own interests can be detrimental to society, yet people seem more afraid of the Christian influence on society than the influence of corporations on society. I'm not defending Christian politics, I think church and state should always be separated, but people seem more prejudicial about Christianity influencing society, especially through politics, than other groups. Why is that?
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Perhaps, when advertisers and politicians begin banging on our front doors demanding we accept their doctrines or face eternal damnation, folks would probably start becoming more bothered with them than the preaching Christian.
  
  Corporations influencing policies is something altogether different. And, there most certainly are folks who are quite vocal about it, far more than complaining about a preaching Christian.
  
  Just look at the group, Anonymous, as an example.
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Perhaps, when advertisers and politicians begin banging on our front doors demanding we accept their doctrines or face eternal damnation, folks would probably start becoming more bothered with them than the preaching Christian."
  
  The words are different, but the technique is exactly the same. Christians, politicians and advertisers use fear to try to influence others. Why is using the fear of [insert political boogeyman here] to try to influence people, more acceptable than using fear of god? Why is using the fear of [insert social angst that product X eliminates here] to try to influence people, more acceptable than using fear of god?
  
  "Corporations influencing policies is something altogether different. And, there most certainly are folks who are quite vocal about it, far more than complaining about a preaching Christian."
  
  I perceive more negative public discourse about Christianity than about corporate influence on government. That's entirely subjective of course, but I consider myself fairly up to date on current social and political issues.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Sorry Don, I don't buy that.
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Fair enough. Although I think it's quite reasonable to say many people (including myself) would be able to name Dawkins and Harris off the top of their head, but might struggle to name two anti-corporate-corruption activists, or any books they've written. This indicates that either many people are poorly read, or that the anti-theism message is 'louder' than the anti-corporate-shenanigans message. Also in the news media, I think the influence corporations play in various public debates, e.g. gun control, is less widely discussed or reported than the role religion plays in various public debates, such as abortion. The methods used by the likes of the Westboro Baptist Church to influence the debate on abortion, are widely reported on while the methods used by foreign corporations like Benelli Corp. and Sig Sauer to influence the gun control debate in the U.S. (their biggest market) go unmentioned; Even though those methods are more influential than anything the WBC could hope to achieve. I think that's a double standard.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That merely indicates ones interest in one topic over another. So what?
  
  Could it be that perhaps the corporation in question has no where near the influence over a huge mass of people compared with Christianity and the rest of the world?
  
  Do you even think for a moment I can accept such a ridiculous comparison? Westboro?
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The fact I know the name of Kim Kardashian, doesn't indicate that I have more of an interest in her than others. It indicates that she gets more exposure (so to speak) in the media than others.
  
  It could, but I don't think that's the case. I think corporations and banks now wield much more influence than organised religion. Indeed I think both religion and politics have become tools used to further corporate interests.
  
  You're right it's not a fair comparison. A fairer comparison would be between one of the Christian lobby groups, and a corporation like Binelli. Both spend large amounts of money trying to influence domestic politics and policy. Both have front organisations that obscure the sponsors. Both use fear and intimidation as a tactic to further their cause. Don't see many references to Binelli and its influence in the gun control debate. Seem to be more references to Christian advocacy groups and their influence in public debate. Double standard?
  report
6. 0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's not just a "cause".
  No, Christians shouldn't lobby like a social group. Christianity is about people's souls, not about simply getting numbers to "join" a social group or political group.
  They shouldn't have to lobby anyway. America was built on Christian principles, survives on the concept of repentance and forgiveness (yes, even in our legal and criminal system), and should never be remanded to a "caucus" or some such nonsense as though we're a civil rights group or something.
  
  If our leaders would've continued to do their jobs correctly, standing on those Biblical principles which are echoed by the Constitution, there wouldn't be a problem. We should never fall into the trap of becoming politicized in such a direct fashion, and we won't as long as we recognize the Left's tactics for what they are---------to get us to be just another "cause" or political group is the only way the Left can get us on level playing grounds with their own agenda; they think they can handle us there and tackle us there; and indeed it's started working amongst those of us who fail to see the intent.
  
  Just like the title of this thread........it's a good question! And I can answer it with that same reply as I just did. People get angry about Christians preaching because they don't like to hear the words "repentance" and "forgiveness" etc. They'd much rather keep us on a playing field where they think they can hold us to discussing "rights" and legalities, as though we're just another political group. Fervent honest Christians will always end up speaking at some point about repentance and forgiveness; they will speak about Christ instead of touting a particular Church; they will speak about eternal life versus eternal death instead of just earthly legalities.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Actually our legal system is based on Viking mythology. Thor was thier God of justice, and courts were held on Thorsdays(Thursday to you and me)
  
  Seen a gavel ever? That's Thor's Hammer.
  
  Our wonderful country was started by Masons, not Christians, by the way.
  reply report
  0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I don't care what props or ways have been incorporated into, or brought from, other influences. The fact is that our laws are based on Biblical laws for the most part. Even our bankruptcy laws echo the laws of debt forgiveness in the Bible. It's called the year of jubilee. Not to mention, even, the Ten Commandments being the basic set of laws that our Nation's laws are based upon.
  So, whatever, let the Judges use "Thor's hammer" if that's what they wanna bang down in the name of justice. lol. It matters not. Myths should be good for something, even if it's just entertainment, and even if it's just for special effects. ha.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  And the Ten Comandments are based on the Egyptian ten commandments.
  
  Why don't you do a little reseach into history and mythology, you might actually learn something interesting.
  
  There is not one single aspect of Christianity that wasn't taken from another source.
  reply report
  0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Okay, who are you and what have you done with janesix?
  reply report
  0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Good question.
  
  I'm wondering if it was the words "repentance" and "forgiveness" or "Christ" and "eternal life and death" that did it...........
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  All religions are based on the same thing.
  
  Excep perhaps for islam, I can't figure that one out yet.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No different - it's still about power for a few and using that power to control the rest of the plebes.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Most, if not all, religions have been hijacked and twisted beyond all recognition of the original intent.
  
  The basics are still the same, the true kernals of wisdom are still there, in a disguised form.
  
  I agree that religion is used for control of the masses, but that is never the original intention.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, they were all twisted beyond recognition from the get go.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Oh? How, exactly?
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Uh, because they're just myths and superstitions based on other myths and superstitions. You said that yourself in another thread. Or, was that you?
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I said Christianity was based on other myths.
  
  All myths and religions have the same core truths.
  report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You mean the same core lies.
  report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  What lies would those be, and who is doing the lying?
  report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The lies about facts and evidence in reality that conflicts with those myths and superstitions. The liars are those who deny and reject facts and evidence.
  report
  61
  Disappearingheadposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Brenda, it seems that you vision a past utopia and yearn for a future one where Christians and Christian doctrine derived policies determine the path of America. Although I believe in Jesus, I can think of nothing worse than the Church being involved in politics or the running of a country. History tells us religious politics only leads to suppression of truth, freedom of speech, the rights of the individual to self determination, and a brake on scientific and technological progress.
  
  How do you suppose that believers like myself who refuse to accept Christian manmade doctrines will be treated? You already call people like me who reject trinity doctrines and the existence of satan, demons and hell heretics. Under your your utopia, would I be arrested and put in prison?
  reply report
  83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Whether you consider it to be more than just a cause or not, the point is that Christian groups use the same techniques as advertisers, political parties, charities and corporations to deliver their message and persuade others. Whether you think they should or not, the fact is that Christian groups are lobbying, advertising, publicising and promoting Christianity. My question is, why do people get angry at Christians for preaching and lobbying, but don't seem so angry about corporations, political parties etc. doing the same. Is that a double standard?
  reply report
  0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, it's a double standard.
  But as I said, we shouldn't have to lobby and all that. But I stand by the right of Christians to do so! I just think there's a danger of Christians becoming and being seen as JUST a part of a political group.
  It's kinda like my view on the law that people can get a tax break on giving to charity and tithing. ....If you're gonna give, give, but don't do it for the purpose of nor the expectation of, getting a deduction on your taxes! That's how I see it. Churches can become way too business-like and get deterred from the real reason they exist----to preach the Gospel.
  reply report
71
Renee Abbottposted 11 years ago
Some Christians spend a lot of time on their causes. I understand their passion for Jesus. How would they feel if I have the same causes and passion for the Goddess I follow. Woulld they listen without complain? Would they wish me to shut-up? The Christian truth is not mine. I though am not made to get people to listen to me and believe. The Goddess is not an immature god who needs people to follow. Goddess, as did Jesus preached love your neighbor. Love is the answer. So Christianity makes no sense to me. Jesus said love is the answer, so why would he toss very good people into hell?
reply report
71
Renee Abbottposted 11 years ago
..and please dont tell me it is in the bible. I dont really want an answer, since I have heard them all. I just stopped by to answer your question.
reply report
83
psycheskinnerposted 11 years ago
When people advocate in a way that harasses me or endangers my interested I do tend to get energized about it. This is not specific to those who do so for religious reasons. But very few people do so for non-religious readers.

Clean coal or safe nuclear power, for example, is to my mind dangerous nonsense--but their advocates don't knock on my door, call me, tell me solar power is sinful or that they are the one true energy.
reply report
1. 61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yet, you will be harmed by their passionate cause.
  
  (Quick, go to edit "harasses me or endangers my interested." before time runs out. Your translation program let you down.)
  reply report
2. 83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Clean coal or safe nuclear power, for example, is to my mind dangerous nonsense--but their advocates don't knock on my door, call me, tell me solar power is sinful or that they are the one true energy."
  
  Political parties do all those things. Charities do too, to an extent (ever been stopped in the street by a charity mugger?). Corporations certainly evangelise. Apple would have you believe that the iPad is the one and only electronic tablet worth buying. All others are (literally) pale imitations. So why should Christians be singled out for this behaviour?
  reply report
61
Getridameposted 11 years ago
How come Hindus never post here?
reply report
1. 83
  Don Wposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  How do you know I'm not Hindu?
  reply report
90
peeplesposted 11 years ago
While attending a local festival Christians lined the streets screaming scripture, carrying signs saying homosexuals would burn forever and spouting nonsense about how parents should disown their children if they turn away from God. My children were subject to this. I had to explain to my children that the great thing about the USA is that even idiots have the right to free speech.
Christian preaching often teaches to hate, to disciminate, to dislike and treat people badly simply because they live different. That is what angers me not the fact they want to preach, but the fact they use their preaching to hold down or look down on others. I have nothing wrong with anyone who believes they don't have to look down on others to feel like they are doing right by their own beliefs.
I am passionate about my beliefs, however I do not go out in the streets screaming believers are idiots or put a sign in my yard saying God is like Santa.
reply report
1. 61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I hear you. Please, don't get the lunatic fringe confused with those who love you.
  reply report
  90
  peeplesposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I do my best not to since I am married to a Christian, however far to many of the lunatic fringe exist here in the south of USA.
  reply report
  61
  Getridameposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Tell me about it.
  
  Come to the promised land! Fifty bucks a pop.
  
  See Romans beat Jesus . . . four times daily
  
  Beating Jesus really works up an appetite!
  reply report
61
AlexandraOlynikposted 11 years ago
I don't get angry when Christians preach, but I get annoyed when they keep going after I tell them I'm not interested.

What upsets me more than anything is the hypocrisy. A Christian will tell you that they do not judge, but isn't it judgment when they will tell you that your beliefs are wrong? I try to live a life where I don't hurt or steal from anyone. I am a moral individual, yet according to the Christians I have encountered, I will be going to Hell because I am a Pagan, however, the mass murderer who accepts Jesus just before being put to death will be going to Heaven and all its rewards. It makes no sense to me.

I believe there is a higher power, but is that higher power the God of Abraham in the Bible? I don't believe so. I believe that all gods exist and watch over us. Even the Bible acknowledges there are other gods..."Put no other gods before me". But, the Bible is a book. It's not fact. Sure, there are some historical facts in it, but there are historical facts in all books of mythology.

When it comes to religion, Christianity is the new kid on the block. If you read up on the gods of ancient Egypt, you will see that Jesus was not the first to rise from the dead. Osiris did that long before Jesus. Christianity is a mixture of earlier religions, including the "borrowing" of Pagan holidays like Yule and Ostera.

I do not judge those who believe differently than I and I don't expect to be judged for my beliefs by others. We need to realize that we are all different and if no one is hurt by another, it should be live and let live.
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Why are you angry about Christians preaching?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Why are you angry about Christians preaching?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies