you are quite the patient man. I admire your ability to remain reasonable in what would become "childish" conversation.
If I am not one of your fans yet, I am now.
sooner than later.
Hey pam, good to see you. I was down your way last week. Got a little hot there in Phoenix huh?
Yes he does owe you an apology. This matter came up before and he did not listen then either.
Very selective reading.
Yeah well, he speaks for god so I guess god does not apologize when he gets it wrong.
He has prompted me to write a book though. A hard book rather than an ebook.
He is a perfect example of why a belief in an invisible super being rots your brain and destroys your ability to think for yourself. He just is not capable of hearing what I am saying. He does not care if he falsely accused me or damaged me in some way. This is secondary to the Word. And they are proud that all that matters is the Word. I do not count. How I feel does not count. All that matter is spreading the hatred.
Just imagine how advanced we could be - morally and ethically - if we had gotten rid of this notion that the reward is in the afterlife and we need to shout "Jesus is Lord!" until the heathens believe what we believe.
Look at the spider woman - dumping the same thing over and over - all wrong - to try and prove that millions of scientists and millions of pieces of evidence are all a lie to stop her from beleebing in Jeebus.
Sad - that is what it is. I admire your tenacity in the face of so many of them telling ypu you are worthless and there is something wrong with you for not believing what they believe.
I am out of here until the religionist Low apologizes for making false accusations.
Bet he cannot - what do you think?
You've been "out of here..." many times before. Will you keep your word this time?
If Jim does NOT apologize, and you come back, that makes YOU a liar,NO? I mean, that's how you define lying!
Jim Low publicly accused me of doing something I did not do. Here on this forum. I guess in true drama queen christian matrydom I should have started a new thread away from the ridiculous beliefs forum. But I prefer to be honest and up front instead. I know I know - that is not the way people who believe in Jesus like to behave. Thank you for reminding me why your religion disgusts me and many others.
Me a liar? LOLOLOLO
No wonder you are despised -
You just cannot see that being a judgmental hypocrite is guaranteed to get people to despise you can you dj?
Oh well - as long as you get to be judgmental - that is what is really important huh?
But keep on calling me a liar so that I will prove what a liar I am by responding to you.
Then you are "right"
Like what it says in the bible about publicly judging others until they hate you.
That is what it says right?
That is what Jeebus taught you to do?
Now I am definitely out of here.
Call me a liar again and I will start a new thread just for you.
low jim may find apology too much for his massive ego. Like many other religionists he carries the only truth around with him and speaks without hearing others as they are not in agreement with his version of his god. Bloody hilarious! .
From what I am reading here, it is certainly NOT the religionists who have the best argument about God's existence. Considering the thread is about arguing, I suppose both sides have won. Then again, if the religionists have to argue about it, perhaps they haven't won anything, and lost much.
Whilst Mark Knowles needs no defense, he is big enough to defend himself, Jim Low is really out of line and ignorant not knowing that Mark Knowles doesn't need to lie. He has never wavered from his stand for one and is way too mature to stalk any hubs incognito. He would do it to your face, that's the kind of man he is.
Jim, if you are the kind of man you portray yourself to be (a God knower and lover), you perhaps would do well to lead by example, or be lead by the teachings of Jesus. Just a thought.
Mind you, if you really are just here to argue, go right ahead, you're doing a good job of it. Perhaps leave God out of it altogether, it's a bit off center regardless of what side you're on.
Now that I know what "specifically" you are talking about as far as my falsely accussing you, I will offer you an apology for that. While I didn't say specifically that it was you I did imply that I thought it was you who posted the comments I referred-to in the earlier post.
I do admit that I actually now don't believe it was you who posted the comments I referred to earlier. They were posted by a member "Hell-No" and the vile name-calling ones I had to disapprove were posted by an unregistered user named "Dan". I believe now that Dan and Hell-No were the same person. Some of the comments are still at the Hubs.
For those attack comments that I now know you would have offered directly toward me, rather than through another member name or unregistered name, I do apologise. <(no sarcasm, it's a sincere one.)
Now let's all move on.
Fair play, Jim - my reaction was nothing to do with religion. You are man enough to offer an apology - for me, the matter is closed. Obviously, I don't speak for Mark!
Dan/Hell-No enjoys a certain notoriety on Hubpages
Now, we can get back to the brawling
I think I have the best arguement about Gods existance, and since it is the best ,there is no need to argue it anymore
It is me
I am unique ,theres no one else like me, nobody, if ya searched the world top to bottom ,you would only find 'one me'
C'mon , do you really think I am an accident , that you you yourself just somehow ,magically formed ,evolved into somebody uniquely distinct from anyone else...?
Science is great!! but the one who thought of it first surely is the Mastermind
Kia Kaha Surfi
Hey Surfi , cool greeting that , now ya got me thinkin Souvlaki and whats that sweet sticky 'to die for' cake ?? baklava, naughty isnt it
Oh hormones , blame hormones
(What was God thinkin') lol oh now theres a hub , hehe
mmmm...Baklava. Might have to have one, now.
We are having a national holiday, although I still have to work
Hey don't laugh ......
God existence is true ......
I believe that as in mathematics quantity such as iota (i) solves many complex problems of mathematics ...... but it is an imaginary quantity, no proof for it's existence and without it many of the problems would be at halt .....
Same is with the God ..... problems around the world are been solved by him ..... but he is in our imagination ......
no proof for it's existence, but without it many of our problems would not be solved .......
Without him, we could be almost problem-ridden. One less topic to argue about, and get killed for.
More like without US, the world (and God) would be problem-ridden.
He's not the problem, NEVER has been. It's always us who create the problems.
Oh, and the killing too. We do that. (Humans, I mean).
Humans < God's creation. (according the believers, not me ) Sowho's to blame ??
I agree with you on the rest.
To put it another way, "we are our own worst enemy".
That's like seeing a rotten apple and saying, "what lousy fruit". It didn't start out that way.
If you read the Bible. since Adam & Eve, When this loving God decided to put the famous Tree in front of them and watch them fall.
He was created to fall. Created by a sadist God ,it seems.
I guess that would be your opinion.
Not mine. But we see things differently.
PS Man was not created to fall. He could have chosen wisely. Hope you and I choose wisely, with what we have to work with.
Sorry to disagree ,but he couldn't. The Tree was created for him to fall. God's all knowing . Remember ? So he knew what was going to happen.
A lot of contradictions in tha belief system.
Anyway, we will never agree, so lets forget about it.
you got your point. I go mine! We're Even
A complete joke more like. Science proved the Earth is well older than the Bible claims. Science proved 2 Million years of mankind existed......Bible goes back only 6,000 years.
Sounds like proof that the Bible is a man-made creation and only came from his mind.
And, I suppose that you also believe that man is as he is today. Which would also be wrong, because mankind walked the Earth many centuries no knowing who or what he(individually) was. The only reason for not knowing who or what he was, was because just like animals, humans were guided by nature.
It wasn't until mankind evolved his own consciousness that he was able to think for himself, instead of reacting to the world around him.
Somehow mankinds record doesnt quite show that we would all live peacefully if their was one less arguement sadly...
To be honest Im convinced it would be quite the opposite.
Just thinkin on some places that have no religion ,well no obvious religion , and um they probably still eating one another ...plus wheres theres no law , there is lawlessness...
I just dont like my household,society,world having 'no boundaries' I guess
Anyway I really only came to say anyone wanna have lunch with me tippy toes out.
An you big boys quit arguing and do some work
The sage Aryabhatta invented zero and mathematics by observing the laws of this universe or god.
Zero is a concept for enlightenment or god.
God do exist! need proof? God is nature. He lives in our heart. he is you and me because we are his sons. He is the truth and the kindness. He made this whole universe as his laws. You planted good things than you will dilatable good things and otherwise.
Existence exists. To think that it was created by a "god" or a "creator" is foolishness. Such foolishness could only be created by man.
If you're looking for an answer how LIFE came to be, including nature...the MOON orbiting the Earth is the only reason the Earth can support life-forms at all.
Ok great tantrum
Garden Salad and sirloin tip cheese burgers ( screw the diet)
I want meat!!
If ya see Justine around ,can ya hit her up for the blue vein dressing and maybe some of her home made bread
If Badco shows himself ,I know hes good for some Cab Sav
I said grace ,
Also without light there is no color only darkness.
No one can touch or see gravity but we know, that it exist!
Got to love a thread with all 634 posts so far when the correct answer was given in post number 2!
The argument against there being a god is flawed because if you have one strange event, something unexplainable then the pure system of evolution or chemicals in the brain does not explain all events in time and space. There are too many proven events that have no explanation. These type of "mystical" events point to a different reality. Physics begins to sound strange when you try to include all events in space and time. All you end up with is theories. Is light a wave or particle? How can it change when it wants to- seemingly random? So my arguement for something- beyond evoltion or what we have in place, begins here.
The narrowness of the point-of-view promotes the outcome. Quatum physics shows that the observer and the observed are interconnected. As soon as the western mind understands that their is no objective reality separate from human perception then many things will become clear. Their is more going on in this universe than our 10% brain activity is understanding. The brain activity is provable. The universe has not yet been completely explored.
Our western world view is flawed because we cannot include all experiences in our framework. Quatum physics is on fast forward and the western-Newtonian machine clockwork world view is obselete. Holographic experiments are already happening. The Eastern world-view is not so problematic because most of all experiences fit into their framework. I think it is funny that we use our technology, we are playing around with many new technologies but people think our consciousness is not moving at a higher rate.
Is it God or Consciousness? Are we vibrating balls of energy? How fast can I vibrate? Does the Dali Lama increase his awareness with his methods of mediation? Is this what we are talking about when we try to understand God? There is a lot more going on that meets the eye. Dreams, Promonitions, mystical experiences, medicine men, - all these things do not fit into the evolutionary-scientific point-of-view. You can explain it away like the Bible-obssessed believers- its the devil, it is chemicals- but they are all weak arguments because there are too many documented experiences everywhere, everytime, in all cultures. This is the problem with both sides.
In answer to your question no agument is good enough, IT'S NAME IS DIUS, AND IN THE BIBLE IT CLEARING SAYS THAT THE COMFORTER SEND BY JESUS CHRIST ITSELF AND AS IT IS SAID IN THE REVELATION THAT THE ONLY ONE THAT KNOWS HIS NAME IS THE ONE THAT HAS IT ON HIM,SO WE GO TO THE HEBREWS, AND THEY WILL TELL YOU THAT GOD COULD NOT LIE BY THESE TWO IMMUTABLE PROOFS, ONE BEING JESUS CHRIST AND THE OTHER THE COMFORTHER THAT HE SENT, AND TWO MORE IMMUTABLE PROOFS ARE FOUND IN THE NAME YAWEH,IF ANY ONE HAS WISDOM, CHECK TO YOUR HEARTS CONTENT WHAT THIS NAME IS
by PhoenixV 7 years ago
What Is The Best Evidence For The Existence Of God?
by alexandriaruthk 10 years ago
How can you use logic to justify the existence of God?Or it just boils down to faith?
by Jacob 10 years ago
No. Many people, from evolutionary biologists to important religious figures like Pope John Paul II, contend that the time-tested theory of evolution does not refute the presence of God. They acknowledge that evolution is the description of a process that governs the development of life on Earth....
by Vapid Maven 11 years ago
So I've been thinking a lot about this lately. I've been involved in a lot of discussions on the lack of any physical evidence to the existence of any god (no matter what the religion)and it is always countered with there is also no physical evidence that a god "does not" exist which is a...
by Luke M. Simmons 6 years ago
Does anyone have any evidence for the existence of God?I am an atheist, which to me only means that I haven't been shown requisite evidence to convince me of an omnipotent, all-knowing deity of any kind. If you would, please bring forth this evidence and deliver me from a fiery...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar 2 years ago
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So believers should prove the existence of God if he exists. But if they want to do it,...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|