Why have the rich always been demonized while the poor have always been glorifie

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (17 posts)
  1. gmwilliams profile image81
    gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago

    Why have the rich always been demonized while the poor have always been glorified, even deified

    by some social & religious pundits?  What makes these social & religious pundits consider the rich to be immoral, even debauched while the poor are somehow viewed as more authentic, purer, & more wholesome?  Give analytical answers.


  2. kbdressman profile image92
    kbdressmanposted 3 years ago

    Social power and economic power (wealth) aren't independent.  There are exceptions, but those who have the means to get their voices heard are going to be heard more often than those who don't.  And, we question things we hear frequently less than things we don't hear frequently.  So, since the poor are usually exonerated and the rich are vilified, more people will automatically assume that is the truth, and perpetuate the idea, than if it hadn't been previously stated.

  3. Oztinato profile image51
    Oztinatoposted 3 years ago

    Those with a lot more than is necessary are open to corruption and ego. It is not impossible to be spiritual and wealthy just extremely rare. Usually the wealthy only look after themselves and forget about others. Most great religious teachers were quite "poor". Unecessary wealth can easily blind a person.

    1. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      There is NO such thing as unnecessary wealth.  Wealth enables one to live a civilized, cultivated life as opposed to a brutish animalistic life of poverty, lack, & constant struggle!

    2. kbdressman profile image92
      kbdressmanposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      gmwilliams....If there is no such thing as unnecessary wealth, how do you justify someone with hundreds of millions of dollars sitting in a bank account that they never use or do anything with?  'What do you call it?  Isn't that unnecessary wealth?

    3. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Oh dear, there is such a thing as socioeconomic legacy.  Wealthy people leave monies to their descendants so those descendants will always be socioeconomically advantaged.  You see rich people think ahead....WAY AHEAD.

    4. Oztinato profile image51
      Oztinatoposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      then why does JC criticize the rich? You know "eye of needle" etc. I knew a wealthy man who believed he was spiritual while lying and cheating. His spolit kids expected everything etc. A result of greed. Greed=too much wealth.

    5. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      This is an illogical premise you have presented.There is NOTHING wrong w/ "too much" wealth. Again,THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "TOO MUCH" WEALTH.The poverty mindset seems to permeate in the aforementioned commentary. Being poor ISN'T good, people!

    6. Oztinato profile image51
      Oztinatoposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      It's not about "being poor". How on earth did you get that out of a criticism  of being greedy? People have needs but it's the greed you don't seem to admit too.

  4. bradmasterOCcal profile image37
    bradmasterOCcalposted 3 years ago

    The real question is where is the middle class, while the rich get richer, and there are more poor people now?

    Great Britain has the Royal Family who live off the country at the expense of the people. The people probably don't mind as much as we would because it is tradition.

    The United States has a de facto Royalty, and they gain their wealth through the loop holes embedded in the Internal Revenue Code provided by congress for the last one hundred years.

    Take a look at the Internal Revenue Code that changes every year, and even the congresses that wrote the code never read all of it, nor do they understand it any better than the wage earners that have been left out of these benefits.

    The Tax Reform Act of 1986 basically wrote the wage earner out of the few deductions that they had in the code. Government workers have offsets to all of the burdens suffered by the average wage earner.

    They have FERS, Federal Employee Retirement System, and use SS as a bonus.
    They have FEHS, Federal Employee Health System.
    They have job security, and other benefits.
    FERS is a real privately, not government managed, Defined Benefit Retirement.
    The FEHS gives the employees the best healthcare benefits.
    All of this is subsidized by the taxpayer.

    My point is that Rich can side step the Income Tax, and the poor get government aid and don't pay income tax. That leaves the burden on the middle class wage earner.

    Yes, the rich ten percent pay 90% of the income tax, but that is still only a fraction of what they should have paid, if they didn't have the Internal Revenue Code to protect the bulk of their fortunes.

    Basically, the US has a modern day version of the Feudal System, with a president and a congress acting as a King, and maybe soon as a Queen.

    If I went off your expectations for an answer, please delete my comment.

    1. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      You have made some quite excellent points sir!  The middle class is getting hit left & right.  The middle class is THE AMERICAN BACKBONE!

    2. bradmasterOCcal profile image37
      bradmasterOCcalposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you.
      As the middle class shrinks, so does the country.

  5. Michaela Osiecki profile image75
    Michaela Osieckiposted 3 years ago

    I wouldn't say the rich have always been demonized, but I think in our current economic and cultural standings, they have demonized themselves by hoarding wealth and making it damn near impossible for others to climb up out of poverty.

    No one wants to be poor, let me tell you that. No one wants to struggle to make ends meet day after day and worry about whether their kids will be able to eat each day or what will happen if their car breaks down or they lose their job. That's not a comfortable way of life for anyone.

    But these people are also the ones who care most about their families, their communities, and their ability to keep their heads above water in the most dire of circumstances - qualities that are revered in American culture.

    1. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      There ARE people who WANT, EVEN LOVE to be poor.  They want to be victims in life.  Even though there is opportunity, they maintain that they do not want ANY responsibility nor do they want to work hard to be successful!

  6. GERALD-710 profile image61
    GERALD-710posted 3 years ago

    Until recently, most societies were composed of a poor majority, a small middle class and an even smaller elite who often owned as much as half the wealth in a country. Religion often panders to the poor masses who seek in it at least some form of relief, spiritually even if they couldn't get physical relief. On the other hand, the wealthy generally do not pander to the religious establishment(exceptions are those who want something in exchange or are wealthy and involved in politics where that category of wealthy has to pander to the poor masses too) since they use money for all their forms of relief. That has always been the case even in ancient times. The Roman elite were largely secular though the masses worshipped various gods like Jupiter. Thus in order for religion to look more appealing to the poor masses, the rich who have everything are villified while the poor are given hopes of a wealthier afterlife, prayer will bring prosperity or poverty is the True Path as a way of locking them in the religion.

  7. wba108@yahoo.com profile image77
    wba108@yahoo.composted 3 years ago

    Well in relation to politics, its politically advantageous to demonize the rich because of envy and that they're relativity few in number. For those who've failed in to succeed in America ( the wealthiest nation in world history), its easier to blame the rich than it is to ask the hard questions as to why they've failed. Most tyrants use this tactic of class warfare, Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Lenin ect. because to divide and conquer is a basic military tactic that is also an effective political one.

    1. gmwilliams profile image81
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      GREAT answer by the way, I LIKE your synopsis!


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)