Hi everyone, I had this one suggestion to prevent stolen hubs, how about making hubs cannot be copied by restricting selection using javascript or any script? This is kind a simple script. Or give the authors the ability to add this script to their hubs?
Or when someone is copying a hub, a script will include the link of the hub, like myanimelist.net does. Or the RSS hub backlink and copyright in the beginning or end of an RSS Feed hub? Just suggesting
The reality of online publishing is that if someone can read content in a web browser, then they have a copy of the content on their computer.
While it is possible to eliminate a users ability to copy text via JavaScript, this most impacts readers and has the effect of breaking the reader experience.
Consider if a reader wanted to copy a sentence from your Hub and then share it on Twitter or Facebook with a link. If copy was disabled for a Hub, then they would be unable to do this.
A more technically proficient person could simply disable JavaScript or view the page source, so it would mostly inconvenience a legitimate reader.
I added this information to a FAQ entry to help others going forward.
http://hubpages.com/faq/#disablecopy
Hi Matthew, shouldn't a reader click a social share button if they want to share? If they're being so pedantic they want to copy sentences to put into their own share option, I think HP are pandering to a few people at the expense of the majority of authors by not putting on disable right click. Plus don't they get to add their own comments as they post on social media anyway?
Also, I can't say I've ever shared anything by copying and pasting sentences etc. I just click share buttons. So I don't know if there's massive amounts of people doing it.....
Please consider no right click. I really don't see how it would interrupt anyone's reading experience at all. They can still read it and they can still share it. Hubbers are annoyed at having to report tons of stuff and this would help a little bit. Please reconsider!!!
Plus, added benefit is that HP will no longer be seen as a go to site for copying for amateurs, only for those with serious software.
PS - no right click could just be for text. I know a lot of people have photo hubs that would have to move if images were disabled.....but disabling text would help everyone.
I agree with Susanne - if someone wants to copy only a sentence, they can type it our, or share a link. Disabling the ability to simply copy a sentence does NOT interfere with the average reader's experience. The experience here is reading, not copying.
Sure, if someone really messes with things, they can figure out how to copy text, but why are we making it easy for anyone to copy content on the site? I have one hub that's been copied at least six times (still shows all six sites have it) the site has a URL ending in ZA (???) I can't find a way to contact them, and clearly, they don't care. Several others are copied, too. Some are bloggers, and even some of those are hard to track.
WHY is Hubpages refusing to do anything that might help even a tiny bit? It takes time for us to handle any copied content issue. Perhaps that small amount of time could be spent tracking down and fighting the real thieves (the ones using bots and stealing massive amounts of content). Instead, we have to spend time addressing even the smaller operations.
Writers here are the ones who have spent hours creating content. Are you telling us you're not going to support and protect us, because it might create a minute of annioyance for a reader, when you can implement legitimate ways to satisfy both parties?
Meanwhile - I've reported a New Hubber who posted a link here on the forum to 'his' hub. The entire content is copied from a textbook. The 'Hubber' cannot write clear English. I've included links to the textbook. Why is this person still on the site?
We seem to have counter-productive practices regarding copied content. It's okay for people to steal our work, and it's okay for people to publish hubs that are stolen content.
I agree with you Marcy Goodfleisch. Is it not better for us writers here at HP if this site will do something against the thieves? Like making this site hard to be copied and pasted?
Yes!!
I've noticed things that were clearly copied, and I've reported them.
I've never actually gone back to be sure they were gone later. Perhaps I should start checking back?
I might have been incorrect about some of these things, but you can kind of tell when something is from a pamphlet or brochure.
Hi guys, I'm back.... just wanted to add this... what if instead of disabling anything, why just include the hub link? when someone wants to copy a phrase from a hub... Like for example, a hub about a tutorial of making a paper aeroplane..
So if a reader wanted to copy the phrase "Prepare a piece of paper..." then a link back to your hub will be included..
then instead of just..
"Prepare a piece of paper..."
it will be:
"Prepare a piece of paper... Read more at: http://joween18.hubpages.com/tut-paper-airplane"..
It would be convenient if the user wants to share it to a social nerworking site like Facebook, coz Facebook interprets the link automatically.. or in our case we wanted to share a lot of our hubs, then it would save a lot of time..
I think including the link leads copiers to believe that it's okay to copy and paste... because they're citing their source.
Good point, but maybe a copyright notice could be included in the link?
Giving users this kind of capability is exactly why I'm glad MySpace is dead.
Although you have only been on this site for five months, this is an ongoing discussion that has been taking place for nearly the entire time this website has existed. You may also note that content copying is a widespread problem across the entire internet, and not just here.
I have some questions for you.
1) Do you really think that no one has ever suggested your same suggestion before in the history of HubPages or the Internet?
2) If that would really work to stop content thieves, don't you think that there would already be something like that here? If something like that would really work don't you think it would be in place all over the entire Internet?
Well, my answers are as follows:
1. I have no way of knowing.
2. HubPages is particularly vulnerable, I would think, because there are many different authors, posting many different articles (Hubs), all of whose content is the original work of one individual person, not a corporate entity.
Corporate entities have a lot of -- what do you call it? --- like, templates, cut and paste, "prefab" I guess, which is not original in any event, on their websites.
But, corporate entities also have unlimited resources to go after any plagiarism they find anywhere in the universe, basically.
{My first You Tube video is of me sitting in a coffee shop web camming myself trying to figure out how to make a You Tube video. LOL
{ YT removed it, saying "plagiarism" --- because of the background music that was playing in the coffee shop at the time. It took me a really long time to figure it out. The message said something about music, which baffled me because I didn't have any music ---- or so I thought :-) Proving that we really DON't pay attention to background music.}
These variables might make Hubpages an especially ripe plagiaristic field.
Or, to put it more politely, since we all get started on the web at different times:
Most content thievery is not done by humans manually using the copy/paste functions of their web browsers.
Instead, it's done by bots, mini computer programs written by the thieves that scan the web and "scrape" all the code and content (or text content) from webpages they encounter. It's automated, and there's no point at which a human ever selects "copy" and "paste" from a pulldown menu.
Why can't we block bots? Because, unfortunately, bots are also how search engines like Google find our content and list it under search results. If we blocked the computer programs responsible for copying our content, it would prevent hubs from showing up in Google or other search engines. That would make Hubpages practically invisible to the entire web, and our traffic would drop to almost nothing.
I still believe that disable right click would get rid of some copiers. Not the article spinning idiots, but the ones starting wordpress and blogger sites with only a few pages, who obviously just copy and paste manually.
No right click would get rid of these people, which would be roughly 1/6 of people I am reporting. Anything that helps with the copier war should be considered....
I think Suzanne is right. Disabling right click would help.
Some people do just copy and paste. One lady on a Yahoo group thought that when she saw the Share buttons, it actually meant that she could copy and paste it and share with anyone. If she thought that, there are lots of people out there that naive. If she would have shared the link instead, it would have helped the site owner.
Reminds me of that commercial, "...I'm saving a lot of time by pasting my vacation photos to my wall..."
The sad part about that is, there really ARE people that dumb out there...
But those people are probably never going to be a threat to you anyway, as their blogs are too small to ever get any attention from Google.
I am finding on a blog of mine that people are copying and pasting to legitimate blogs, that get good readership, my content as their post. Then they pepper their posts with links to sales sites. I guess they are in the SEO game, and if they get away with it they are boosting the site they are promoting.
Hi Marisa, probably as you say, except I found one hub had 40 duplicated copies on Wordpress and Blogger sometime back and this all could have been prevented with no right click. Luckily they're all gone now!
At least the writer here has been banned from the site. I don't get why they can't disallow right clicking though.
Barbara - the one I'm referring to is still on the site. Another one was banned recently. The one I reported posted a day or two ago, asking people to read his/her hub. They now have two hubs published. But their OP is practically illiterate. I'll make a new comment to bring the thread to the top.
I thought this guy was banned, but you are right. I think I might have gotten two threads mixed up.
I dont understand why more sites don't add that feature to protect themselves to some extent. I know that I have worked on websites where disabling right clicks was super easy. I think this is a great suggeston.
You can't disable them from using keyboard shortcuts, though. Most people know how to copy/paste using those.
If you can't select the text with a cursor, how can you select it using keyboard shortcuts? Apart from print screening it?
There are keyboard shortcuts for selecting text, too.
I'm going to try that. I didn't know that one. I like to keep a copy of my own stuff in Word.
Oh yes, it selects everything, including what you probably don't need.
Why do people do that? why do they want to steal original written content when they know it does not belong to them? humans are quite something!
Because they are lazy and greedy at the same time. I never knew there were so many dishonest people in the world until I started to use the internet.
Well, perhaps we should not characterize them like that.
Some of them might be trying to escape a very desperate situation in a Third World country, or they might even be forced physically. They might be victims of human trafficking, and their kidnappers are using them for forced labor.
I hadn't read this thread prior to posting my own similar question in a forum today. Relache replied with the link to Matthew's FAQ about not interfering with the reader who wants to copy and paste ONE sentence to Twitter and Facebook. I could hardly believe what I was reading!
The refusal of the HP Administrative Team to at the very least stop those WordPress and BlogSpot so-called 'bloggers' who steal from everyone because they're too lazy (or illiterate) to write copy themselves is disappointing. These thieves ARE draining our traffic. I can't believe all of them are super-techs who wouldn't be stopped or at least slowed down by the right click disablement. I agree with Marcy that HP should make some effort to support and protect the site's writers and am dismayed that it is apparently not a priority.
Have you noticed that almost none of the major sites do this? Have you considered that Hub-bosses are not doing it for a reason other than to be mean to us?
Like it interferes with honest users and does not impede a dishonest one? I am not any kind of online tech geek and I know how to get around 'no copy' scripts in less than 5 seconds. And the extra script has also kind of potential to slow pages loading and generally screw things up. That is why I do not use it on my own websites and would not want it to be used here.
H m m m - Well, that does make sense also.
I'm inclined to agree, although I really don't even understand the tech aspects of this.
by LindaSmith1 9 years ago
I decided to see how easy it was to prevent content from being copied. I did a quick search and found sites with codes to copy and paste onto your site. It took me 15 minutes to do one of my sites. Now neither my content or photos can be copied. I am not computer saavy, so...
by Ben Guinter 12 years ago
I've gone to many sites where the second you try to highlight text and then right click you get a little error pop up that says, "Sorry this function is disabled"... why do they do that? To keep people from copying their text (or other content) and pasting it somewhere else as their...
by Audrey Selig 13 years ago
There is so much of this going on that it may not be worthwhile to mention. Since I know that this site is not cooperative, I sent my DMCA complaint to Google. My hub is copied word for word with all the lovely photographs and even a link to another similar hub. It probably is my best hub with lots...
by Adele Cosgrove-Bray 10 years ago
Is there a way to block the ability to Copy articles on Hubpages? Some websites have this, so that when anyone tries to left-click their mouse to Copy, the process is blocked somehow. The reason I ask is because I've had to report one website for the second time in little over a week...
by Mary McShane 9 years ago
If you have noticed your traffic decreasing lately on some of your hubs, this Facebook page is copying content from several hubbers and publishing it on their FB page. The Facebook page is called OHealth atwww .facebook .com /pages ...
by Jaye Denman 10 years ago
I've spent hours today tracking down a blogger on WordPress who has numerous blogs and stole one of my best hubs. This impacts my traffic and, thus, my earnings capacity. It happens so frequently (and to so many other hubbers) that it is not only time-consuming and frustrating, but makes me and...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |