Why wont Obama do Fox on Sunday?

1. 0

   A Texanposted 16 years ago

   He is ignoring the most watched cable news in the world for scrubs, why?

   replyreport
   1. 0

      girly_girl09posted 16 years agoin reply to this

      You know why, A Texan!
      
      I honestly can't hold it against him for not going on FOX right now.
      
      Remember the White House being pissed off last year for alleged 'editing' of Bush's MSNBC interview?
      
      I'm sure this administration is worried about that happening on FOX.
      
      Either way, Obama isn't currently a lame duck; he has to worry about his ratings, just like any President serving his first term. Obviously, FOX isn't going to help him right now. 6 or 7 years from now, he might possibly go on. Until then, I wouldn't hold my breath.
      
      To me, not a big deal - it's understandable.

      replyreport
      1. 68

         rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         What could he gain from appearing on a clearly biased and before an audience who never did or will accept him.  It wasn't this group that formed his base and it did everything it could to assure he would not be elected.
         
         If it is because he will not go into the lion's den for fear of being torn to shreds who would?  The topics to discuss would be the typical propaganda they have been espousing since he was elected ie. birth certificates, death panels etc.  What a waste of time it would be and what a childish game to play.  This is not a game people and we are running out of time to participate in it.  We have real issues before us and the more we are hung up on dribble the less is getting done to acheive those goals.

         replyreport
         1. 0

            A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            He is appearing on "clearly biased" networks! It was independents who put him in office not his "base" the independents are watching Fox not MSNBC or the others!

            replyreport
            1. 68

               rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               I happen to be an independent and I watch all the networks to for a clear understanding of all points.  If you have a choice of winning the minds of listeners would you go where you know you have no chance of being accepted or would you go where new ideas can be presented?

               replyreport
               1. 61

                  Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  I am a Centrist, according to tests. Many that discount FOX have never watched it. Most say horrible things about FOX saying; "The people I know would never watch them, they aren't a true news station."
                  
                  They are by far the most watched news station on cable. You can add MSNBC, CNN, and all other's. FOX beats them all, combined. The people know where to get their information now.
                  
                  They now beat Katie Courik on CBS but they aren't for real. And yes, OBAMA does lie!

                  replyreport
         2. 61

            nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            You mean dribble such as whining for more apologies from Republicans? Such as the Speaker of the House calling Tea Party participants Nazis? Such as why his wife shuts down blocks of Washington DC so she can take a limo to buy some vegetables?
            
            Such as why Obama neglected to limit lobbying as he agreed to do during his campaign? Such as why Obama hasn't pulled the telco immunity regulations as he agreed to do during his campaign?
            
            Just dribble.

            replyreport
      2. 86

         RooBeeposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         This is one of the many reasons gg is soo cool. I know you aren't necessarily a big fan of his policy proposals & what not, but you seem to come to your decisions through rational thinking rather than following someone's hype. You are testament to the fact that people can be sensible and rational about things - so diplomatic. I loves ya!

         replyreport
   2. 53

      IvanFigposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      The answer to this one is easy, because FOX feeds people nonsense. Their news information has proved to be inaccurate in the past. The FOX network is great for entertainment, but they're simply known for being good news-source. If you want more credible news try CNN or BBC. "Hell, you can even find more accurate news on Comedy Central." But if you want Scrubs or the Simpsons, watch FOX.

      replyreport
      1. 61

         nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Wow.
         
         So, you can find more credible news from a show that claims it's a comedy show? A show on which the *host himself* encourages his viewers to go elsewhere for real news?
         
         Gulp.
         
         Please provide examples of Fox feeding people nonsense. And remember to differentiate between a commentator and a reporter.
         
         Can you do that?
         
         Please keep in mind that only telling part of a story is not 'feeding people nonsense'. All the networks do that.

         replyreport
   3. 59

      dutchman1951posted 16 years agoin reply to this

      because they exposed him for what his hidden agenda really is, and he is arrogant and self ego centerd and does not want to look at himself in any oher light but what is in his head, that he is perfect!

      replyreport
2. 81

   bgpappaposted 16 years ago

   Because he doesn't want to answer more questions about his citizenship and ACORN.
   
   Why should he give Fox the ratings?

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Fox already has the ratings. Where on Fox is anybody questioning his citizenship?

      replyreport
   2. 71

      Ralph Deedsposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Because Fox declined to run Obama's speech last week which was played live by all the other networks?

      replyreport
      1. 0

         A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         How many times do we have to watch him say nothing? He appeared on all the Sunday shows and said absolutely nothing! Kind of boring Ralph

         replyreport
3. 61

   nicompposted 16 years ago

   1. Fox won't let him use a teleprompter.
   2. Obama apologists don't work for Fox
   3. Susan Rice's head would explode
   4. Michelle threatened to make him sleep on the couch
   5. It would conflict with his bowling league
   6. Fox isn't broadcast in Kenya
   7. Fox didn't get the talking points memo in time
   8. Eric Holder plans to have Fox shut down by Sunday afternoon anyway
   9. Obama thought he would be interrupting a Very Special Episode of the Simpsons
   10. He knows that Tucker Carlson will dismantle him with half his synapses tied behind his back.

   replyreport
   1. 68

      BJCposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      This is it for sure.  Great response!

      replyreport
      1. 80

         jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         You forgot to add: Acorn won't allow it.

         replyreport
         1. 68

            BJCposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            A BIG AMEN to that!!

            replyreport
   2. 60

      Army Infantry Momposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Your funny,...Thank's,..I needed a laugh !!!

      replyreport
      1. 61

         nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Thanks!

         replyreport
4. 59

   coryclarkposted 16 years ago

   Note: I am an independent. Fox is pretty biased. Having said that, it would be a good way for the Obama to engaged Republicans. It would be pretty entertaining.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Fox is biased, ok are MSNBC,CNN, and the rest biased?

      replyreport
      1. 61

         T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Yes, Fox is extremely biased for Republicans.  Yes, MSNBC is equally as biased for Democrats. No, CNN plays much closer to the middle than the other two.

         replyreport
         1. 80

            jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Wow, the middle of what?

            replyreport
            1. 61

               T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               Yeah, I know what you mean, if they're not with you, their against you right?  That's that Republican way.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  And this is the part where we wonder at how the country has become so darn divided, right? 

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                     We have the freedom to be divided. It's a human right.
                     
                     Just like health care.

                     replyreport
                  2. 61

                     T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                     Oh yeah, you hit the nail on the head...the entire country is divided because of me.

                     replyreport
                     1. 61

                        nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                        Wow. I wanna hang out with you. You're a powerful guy!

                        replyreport
                        1. 61

                           T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                           LOL

                           replyreport
                           1. 61

                              nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                              Have you divided the country into Tiger fans and non-Tiger fans?

                              replyreport
                              1. 61

                                 T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                                 Not quite...it's divided into Tiger fans and Lion fans.

                                 replyreport
                     2. 60

                        tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                        No, it's everyone else. It's always everyone else, right?

                        replyreport
                        1. 61

                           T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                           Nope...it's me.

                           replyreport
               2. 80

                  jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  I don't believe I ever bring up Reps or Dems.

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     T_Augustusposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                     You don't have to say the words to express the obvious.

                     replyreport
                     1. 0

                        sneakorocksolidposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                        Hows them feet?

                        replyreport
            2. 60

               tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               LOL! Good question!

               replyreport
   2. 81

      bgpappaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I actually agree with this.  It would be a good idea for him to do O'Reily or Shephard Smith.

      replyreport
   3. 0

      SalesScoopposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      My point exactly. Fox does not report fairly, about anything. I don't watch Fox and don't listen to any of their radio stations either.

      replyreport
      1. 60

         tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         If the latter is true how can you know the former?

         replyreport
         1. 80

            jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            

            replyreport
            1. 67

               Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               Do you have flashbacks from behind the iron curtain, too?

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  I was behind the bamboo curtain for a while...

                  replyreport
                  1. 67

                     Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                     LOL I bet not a big difference

                     replyreport
               2. 80

                  jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  All I can do these days is shake my head in disbelief, is history still being taught in schools?

                  replyreport
            2. 61

               Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               Great comment!

               replyreport
5. 0

   sneakorocksolidposted 16 years ago

   He may be smarter than we think.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      He is behaving true to form!

      replyreport
      1. 0

         sneakorocksolidposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Agree! Fox is not where he wants to go!

         replyreport
6. 73

   Eaglekiwiposted 16 years ago

   Fox is very Hollywoodish , least our local channel is and if that weather girl is constantly on repeat, wt?
   
   I prefer Andy Griffith

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Isn't that what the populace wants "Hollywoodish"? We fall for the comings and goings of stars who are only out to make a buck.
      
      Foxnews is actually real news, the commentators are not the news portion of the network, the news is much fairer than any other network!

      replyreport
      1. 73

         Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         No I dont believe that is what the populace wants ,but its what they have become accustomed too.
         
         And how long have newspapers been out of fashion? I know Im not from here ,but I was stunned that the city I live in has this ratty , overly small print newspaper-wierd to me.
         
         Do you like BBC (America) Texan? they leave out the hoop la and just report the news, leaving out their own opinions

         replyreport
         1. 0

            A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            I have never seen BBC America, I like some opinion with my news. I personally don't care about Brad and Angelina but a lot of these crackhead Americans do.
            
            Newspapers are not doing well because they are getting away from actual journalism and just throwing crap out to read, I am not interested in reading crap! Unless its my own crap then I love it.

            replyreport
7. 73

   Eaglekiwiposted 16 years ago

   Fox sucks
   
   Obama has way too much class

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Obama is like summer vacation, no class!

      replyreport
      1. 73

         Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Awww jealousy perhaps?

         replyreport
         1. 0

            A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            You bet I'm jealous, I have always wanted to be a know it all puppet for the Democrats. I guess I'm just not that smart.

            replyreport
            1. 73

               Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               Hell Im neither I just dont like Fox a whole lot

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Thats ok, they probably don't need your viewership.

                  replyreport
            2. 61

               Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

               No, you're just not corrupt enough. Though that does go for both parties. OU 45-0!

               replyreport
8. 73

   Eaglekiwiposted 16 years ago

   Fox is for people used to being spoonfed junk food.
   
   Drama with lots of trans fat

   replyreport
   1. 80

      jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I like to get spoiled by being spoon fed with the thruth..........taste so much better than ca-ca.

      replyreport
      1. 73

         Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

         Did you mean truth or thrush , yikes
         
         To each their own I guess
         
         I prefer something with a little ( no alot) more intelligent reporting, just me

         replyreport
         1. 67

            Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            And you are smart and educated, right?
            
            Terrible flashbacks, again

            replyreport
9. 60

   Jonathan Jancoposted 16 years ago

   I personally would like to see him do it. It would entertaining to see Hannity and O'Reilly succumb to severe symptoms associated with sharing the spotlight . . . also known as Barbara Streisand Syndrome.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I hate to admit that you may be right about that, at least Orielly loves himself a little too much!

      replyreport
   2. 61

      Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Obama cannot stand up to facts! Do you have one of those three million jobs the stimulus package will provide?

      replyreport
10. 73

    Eaglekiwiposted 16 years ago

    Oh dear misha youre an immigrant like me , what is your problem?
    
    having a bad day ?

    replyreport
    1. 67

       Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Absolutely no problem, just deja vu, that's all

       replyreport
       1. 73

          Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Yea but one of us IS smart and educated

          replyreport
          1. 67

             Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             Have no idea whom you are talking about

             replyreport
             1. 73

                Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                I rest my case

                replyreport
                1. 67

                   Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                   Can we rest together?

                   replyreport
                   1. 73

                      Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                      Oh ooook! , ya dont snore do ya

                      replyreport
                      1. 67

                         Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                         pretty loud
                         
                         Did not mean to sleep though

                         replyreport
                         1. 73

                            Eaglekiwiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                            I know , I know , swedish massage right?
                            
                            oops sorry off topic
                            
                            sorry officer ,it will never happen again

                            replyreport
11. 0

    A Texanposted 16 years ago

    I was hoping Minnesota would beat Cal, ain't gonna happen!

    replyreport
    1. 60

       Jonathan Jancoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Not a bad game . . . but, while we're completely off topic here I'm enjoying Oregon vs. Utah. Go Ducks!!!

       replyreport
       1. 0

          A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Yeah Go Ducks, just don't assault anyone!
          
          Tennessee and Florida is a good one too!
          
          Texas stomping Texas Tech tonight will be the best of all!

          replyreport
          1. 60

             Jonathan Jancoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             Yeah, that embarrassing . . . but no one's gonna hurt in the long run more than Blount will . . . what a career killer!

             replyreport
          2. 61

             Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             Did you check out OU?

             replyreport
             1. 86

                RooBeeposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                D'oh! The Utes are my home team, so it was on one hand very sad. However, my Granddad and Uncle are OU alums - so I cheered the Ducks on their win. Quack, quack.

                replyreport
                1. 61

                   Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                   I meant THE REAL OU, OKLAHOMA! Since 1936 the most wins and best winning percentage.

                   replyreport
12. 0

    A Texanposted 16 years ago

    I would go where the minds are! The little audience that these other networks have are not going to have their minds changed they follow him blindly now!

    replyreport
    1. 68

       rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       You say they follow him blindly now.  Who are They?

       replyreport
       1. 0

          A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Democrats and those who falsely claim to be independent!

          replyreport
          1. 68

             rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             You seem to have a clairvoyance in your answers by claiming you know who or what people believe because of an unsavory outcome.  I suppose you also believe that because someone who votes a certain way based on the facts is predisposed to always be associated with the "person" and not the issue.

             replyreport
             1. 0

                A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                ok

                replyreport
             2. 61

                nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Every voter who chose him because he was black was associating themselves with the person rather than any issues.

                replyreport
                1. 61

                   Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                   Very significant comment. H

                   replyreport
       2. 61

          nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          The flock who wants to be cocooned by the government and the high-minded folks who think they are better qualified to make decisions than the flyover people.

          replyreport
13. 86

    RooBeeposted 16 years ago

    Fox is pretty bad, and I have watched them. I am talking about Fox News - not the local affiliates. I actually like my local Fox news.
    However, the programs on the Fox News network are incendiary and are certainly biased. I agree that bias exist elsewhere, too, but to say that it doesn't exist on Fox...I dunno.
    
    My hubby, who has been a lifelong conservative, used to roll his eyes when I'd make comments about Fox. Lately, he finally watched Hannity and Beck. He shushed me so I wouldn't interject my snarky comments and he could hear it all and assess it in his own way. (He's highly analytical and precise with everything). Anyhoo- he ended up with the conclusion that they were not only biased but they were not presenting a full set of facts on the given topics of discussion.
    
    I won't go in to detail, citing each point that led him to concur w/ me that they are more hype than 'news source' (again, I must reiterate that there is bias elsewhere lest someone think I'm unaware of this). I don't want to make this any longer than I already have...sorry guys, just my (and now the hard-core logic-loving hubby's) two cents.

    replyreport
    1. 67

       Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Very pirate of you

       replyreport
       1. 61

          Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          You can't argue with facts, they lay them out for you. What is your objection to that? The facts Beck presented made Van Jones, umm resign.

          replyreport
          1. 67

             Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             Harvey, are you talking to me?

             replyreport
14. 60

    tksenseiposted 16 years ago

    I think he'd earn a lot of credit for going on considering the impression some people seem to have of the network. The constant comments from the presient and his staff about a particular media outlet smells a little too much like Chavez to me.
    
    Y'all notice what's been going on down there recently?

    replyreport
    1. 61

       Harvey Stelmanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Mi amigo, Hugo. Obama

       replyreport
15. 67

    Mishaposted 16 years ago

    Looks like no.

    replyreport
16. 68

    rhamsonposted 16 years ago

    The funny thing about aligning yourself with either a party or group is that the argument is very short. You save a lot of time bemoaning the facts and just put it out there.  The pathetic thing is some people think this is the way you discuss issues.  The us against them rhetoric can be the only logic that comes of it.

    replyreport
    1. 0

       Madame Xposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Not nesso - if I stand for freedom and you (not you in particular) want me to be your slave, then yeah, we are divided and my "rhetoric" carries more weight than your "rhetoric" because I'm right and you're wrong.
       
       Simple.

       replyreport
       1. 61

          nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Well said. Compromise for the sake of compromise is disingenuous.

          replyreport
       2. 68

          rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Your argument is out of context to the argument.  You are stating a fact rather than an opinion.  If I stated I wanted to enslave you there would no doubt as to my intentions.  But if I am associated through contact or knowledge with someone who ideed enslaved you am I notably  of that persons same opinion?

          replyreport
          1. 0

             Madame Xposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             How is it out of context?

             replyreport
             1. 68

                rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                I am sorry if I took you out of context but when I refered in my statement that assuming an opinion of a person is a direct correlation to a party you took it to mean an individual and not a party.

                replyreport
                1. 0

                   Madame Xposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                   Oh, I see. However, I see our current admin as wanting to enslave us. So if someone supports these views, in whatever form, then I see that individual as wanting my slavery. There is no difference to me.

                   replyreport
                   1. 68

                      rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                      Okay, now we are on a tract I can understand.  What makes you think there is a conspiracy to enslave us by the current administration?

                      replyreport
17. 0

    Poppa Bluesposted 16 years ago

    The Obama administration was just miffed that Fox decided not to run Obama's health care speech on their network station even though they carried it on their news channel. If you ask me the Obama administration is just acting childishly, and spokesman Gibbs has done so before with some of his comments. like maybe Fox would rather play dancing with the stars.

    replyreport
    1. 61

       nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       It's incredibly childish. Obama is the poster child for cultural warfare and this impetuous decision only perpetuates his image. He has attacked Wall Street CEOs, Boston police, retirement fund managers, "the rich", insurance companies, pediatricians, talk show hosts, and who knows what he says to his inner circle during private meetings.
       
       He needs to grow a skin. Evidently he has had it pretty easy for his adult life because he has no idea how to work and play with others.

       replyreport
18. 68

    rhamsonposted 16 years ago

    This is what a two party system gives you.  The choices are far from savory but we the American People continue to participate and bellyache about the fruit of our labors.  My father always said "We have the best government money can buy"  How could anybody think that the band of robbers and thieves on the hill can come up with or want to come up with a plan that looks out for us.

    replyreport
19. 0

    Madame Xposted 16 years ago

    Oh, I don't see it as a conspiracy, I see it taking place outright. Anytime there is a concerted effort on the part of a govt to restrict free market checks and balances what historically follows is less personal freedom. That is happening now in the form of healthcare.
    
    For example, regulations put in place by the democrats, which Obama is not removing, restrict insurers from offering their products across state lines. So if I've had insurance in CA for 20 years, and now I'm moving to Alabama, I can't take that insurance with me. I now have to apply for new insurance as a person 20 years older. I may have a condition that was covered under my previous insurance but isn't now because pre-existing conditions are not covered. Plus, I may lose my good rate because I no longer have an insurance "history".
    
    So the insurance companies in AL don't have to compete with those in CA and as a result can charge anything they want or not cover me at all. As a citizen, my freedom to obtain healthcare insurance is artificially restricted by the govt. It endangers my health and raises my costs.
    
    A simple solution to a big part of the problem of healthcare is to remove those regulations and let the free market compete to get my business. If Harry offers insurance in a way I don't like but Joe across the street does that makes Joe's product better and Harry better shape up or go out of business. That will happen to insurers if the govt backs off.

    replyreport
20. 68

    rhamsonposted 16 years ago

    Madame X
    
    You assume that there is a free market in place that will self govern by way of commerce.  The fact of the matter remains that this kind of coverage was set up to fleece us a long time ago.  The insurance companies bought and paid for this system going back to Nixon and beyond. I don't know to what extent this has a hold on Obama but the groundrules have been in place a very long time.  Instead of focusing on one person to change "Obamas Conspiracy" maybe we should concentrate on the paid slime on both sides of the isle to change it.  Let's revamp the system rather than getting rid of one person who can be made irrelevent through a sound congress.

    replyreport
    1. 0

       Madame Xposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       A free market system will balance itself out if allowed to, no matter what was put in place before it or who put it in place. Removing those obstacles should be the primary goal on our govt agenda. It is not. As a result we have a form of economic slavery.

       replyreport
       1. 68

          rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          My point exactly.  This free market system is not allowed to.  How many swetheart deals and no bid contracts are constantly beind awarded?  The system is set up to allow only the paid freedom of market exchange.  I agree that a totally free market system will adjust to whatever crisis occurs but there are too many actors waiting in the wings to take advantage of favor bought before hand.  How do you suggest we make it a truly "free" market system.

          replyreport
          1. 0

             Madame Xposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             If I had the answer I'd run for president

             replyreport
             1. 68

                rhamsonposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Touche!
                
                I think that we have proved that even though we came to a conclusion from opposite ends of the argument we indeed came to a conclusion.
                
                I would propose that we all put away preconceptions and look for answers within ourselves.  I still believe in "We The People" and have a system by which we can resolve hard problems for the betterment for us.  We have to overturn congress and make policy that they cannot pervert to their means. Us talking this out will make the difference and talking to each other is what the slime on the hill fears the most.
                
                While we don't all believe Obama was the answer enough people threw what they had at the situation and this is what we have.

                replyreport
          2. 0

             Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

             Thank you! ...sincerely.

             replyreport
21. 0

    Madame Xposted 16 years ago

    "slime on the hill" - great minds think alike

    replyreport
22. 0

    Leta Sposted 16 years ago

    Fox News HAS reporters?  Really?  Wow, again...!

    replyreport
23. 77

    mega1posted 16 years ago

    If you were the Prez would you go on Fox Sunday night? because I would consider it an entire and utter waste of time! But that's just my Humble Opinion

    replyreport
    1. 61

       nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Sure, he's only president of the citizens who agree with him. No need to reach out to anyone else. The debate is over, after all.

       replyreport
24. 68

    rhamsonposted 16 years ago

    The fact that television news shows don't report the news but instead feed us homogenized or sensationalized inuendo is nothing new.  I don't know how many times I have heard from a reporter "and this means" as a prelude to a fact being stated.  So many Americans are stupified by these ratings driven shows and put a great deal of stock in what they (the networks) report as news.
    
    We have a wonderful outlet available to us and that is the internet.  You can at the touch of a button explore and investigate a topic and find out for yourself the truth you seek.
    
    Fair and balanced is a great slogan.  But because that is the opinion offered is it correct?

    replyreport
25. 70

    lrohnerposted 16 years ago

    Because he's doing Michelle. OOPSIE!

    replyreport
    1. 60

       tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       I wonder if he uses the teleprompter for that.
       
       
       "Now, now let me make something perfectly clear. I'm going to take this and put it in there. I know some people have concerns about this course of action, and I'm willing to listen to any and all suggestions, but at the end of the day it's important that we move forward and putting this in there is the only way to overcome the same old stagnation that has prevented real progress in this area for so long. The same old excuses and inaction won't get us anywhere and I'm commited to making the kind of whoopie that the American people elected me to make. But I can't do it alone so we need to come together to realize the true potential of this booty call."

       replyreport
       1. 70

          lrohnerposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          

          replyreport
    2. 67

       Mishaposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Wow! I am jealous Lisa, what a one-liner!

       replyreport
26. 59

    Real Estate Ladyposted 16 years ago

    Could it be that he's too tied up doing more important shows like David Letterman?
    
    Jeeze. . .I can't believe this man is president.
    
    Couldn't believe Bush was president either.

    replyreport
27. 74

    Uninvited Writerposted 16 years ago

    If you don't want to hear him speak why did you start a thread complaining about him not...

    replyreport
    1. 0

       A Texanposted 16 years agoin reply to this

       Cause I can! What does one have to do with the other?

       replyreport
       1. 80

          jiberishposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Yup, still can!

          replyreport
28. 0

    A Texanposted 16 years ago

    And who was complaining?

    replyreport