Do you foresee a world government in the near future?

1. 61

   thirdmilleniumposted 15 years ago

   And, will it be the US at the helm?

   replyreport
   1. 0

      WizardOfOzposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      
      
      No and definetly no.

      replyreport
   2. 82

      Urbane Chaosposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Nope.
      
      Think about history when you think about this.  The US really hasn't been around all that long in the grand scheme of things, so it really doesn't have the maturity yet to be "at the helm", so to speak.
      
      And really, as fast as the world is changing, there's no government that can rule that many people at once without having disastrous consequences.
      
      But, if you asked about a true global economy, now I can see that happening in the future..

      replyreport
   3. 57

      colemirandaposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      we already has started the process of the world govt. in the form of world bank, UN, and the internet

      replyreport
   4. 76

      aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Absolutely no doubt....all we need is to read what the Council of Rome said about how they will create a universal problem in order to unite the sheeple behind a one world government.
      
      Sheeple like three square a day and sports TV with a beer, and anyone who will give them that BACK (for the powers that be will first remove all those little things)will be tolerated.
      
      So we get our chaos first, then when the breakdown is complete, the sheeple will DEMAND order and security..... welcome in NWO, welcome in complete control.
      
      After that if you want to eat, trade,work, travel.... heck if you want to stay free to breath, you'll need to make the pledge of allegiance to the NWO, and take the mark, whatever that is, it may just be accepting the bondage in return for living a while longer, rather than standing your ground and refusing to play by their rules.
      
      Either way you end up dead, just sooner with refusal to play.
      
      
      
      Cheery huh!

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Mark Knowlesposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         LOL
         
         And how does this fit with the return of baby jesus which is absolutely guaranteed and any minute now?
         
         Who will get here first? Baby jesus or the NWO?
         
         Not that I see much difference between the two......

         replyreport
         1. 76

            aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

            Back to the scorn again....
            
            This lot happens, or starts happening dependent upon your viewpoint, just before His return.
            
            Keep looking towards the East, but wherever you are you won't miss the event, just try to cover it up afterwards.
            
            "Not that I see much difference between the two...... "
            
            I'm sorry for your myopia.
            
            But Christ does cure blindness, physical and spiritual, so have a word with Him and get restored.

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Mark Knowlesposted 15 years agoin reply to this

               LOL
               
               But if He is coming back - why are you so upset about it?
               
               Seeing as you are Preying "Come Soon Lord Jesus."
               
               I mean - this HAS to happen for him to come back - right?
               
               Lovely condescension though. Well done.
               
               Not that that could be considered scorn.

               replyreport
               1. 76

                  aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

                  Mark Knowles said:
                  
                  But if He is coming back - why are you so upset about it?
                  
                  I'm not at all upset, just reporting the times to those who may be asleep.
                  
                  I mean - this HAS to happen for him to come back - right?
                  
                  Correct, but not as you say it.. it will happen in order to separate the wheat from the tares, sheep from the goats, wise virgins form the foolish ones... you get the picture.
                  
                  Carry on Mark, I could not ask for a better questioner to give me the opportunity to get the word out!
                  
                  Sorry it took a while to get back to you, I was finishing my new hub 'The Satan whisperers..."Did God really say that?"'

                  replyreport
                  1. 60

                     Mark Knowlesposted 15 years agoin reply to this

                     Ah - so you are gloating then. Thanks for clearing that up.
                     
                     Very christian thing to do I gather.
                     
                     Pity you are such a sheeple you are unable to see why you have been sold a bill of goods and persuaded to sit back and let it all happen on the promise of a savior afterward. And you said you were wise. Tut tut. All on what King James told you. No conflct o interest there.
                     
                     And please do not give me any nonsense about reading the original ancient Greek -
                     
                     I assume you would rather die than submit to the NWO.
                     
                     Good sheeple. Baaaah!
                     
                     

                     replyreport
      2. 76

         aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         PS... the photo comes from my hub "Armageddon at Megiddo" which deals with some of this, and the data on the council of Rome can be found on my hub about the Copenhagen Treaty... just for inof!

         replyreport
   5. 83

      Tom Cornettposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      The NWO began 200 years ago with wonderful intentions.  Who was and is still the New World?  Who has it's nose in every nation's business today?
      
      Try to buy sell or trade (major transactions) without a SS# or tax ID#.
      Who has leaders constantly kissing up to them?
      I'll bet Bush still has a hickey on his ass from Tony Blair.
      Who has leaders that wallow in luxuries and absolute security?
      
      The New World Order has been centered within the U.S. government for years now.
      
      The best way to control people is to make them think they are free.

      replyreport
      1. 76

         aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         Amen...

         replyreport
   6. 80

      Springboardposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      I think the most recent (and granted it was not the forming of a government body) forming of the European Union is somewhat telling in that, major powers are not ever so apt to give up their powers. When the European Union was formed, Great Britain, certainly one of the super powers, of course opted out.
      
      Americans are not as patriotic nowadays as I think we were a couple of decades ago, but I can tell you one thing for sure, no American would give up his America.
      
      So to summarize, the answer is no. Even if the US were at the helm. No.

      replyreport
   7. 59

      qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      ...it's too late.
      A 1 world gov't is the only way humankind can be controlled so that it might have a chance to evolve into all it can be.
      Human population is headed for a drastic and necessary diminution in numbers.
      There is not enuf time left for a 1 world gov't to be created.

      replyreport
      1. 65

         Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         Just out of curiousity, are you an alien and related to Mork?

         replyreport
         1. 59

            qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

            ..WAyne!
            I'm in "cloak" form!  How'd you see me? WARP SPEED! get me the hell outa here!!

            replyreport
            1. 65

               Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years agoin reply to this

               LOL!

               replyreport
   8. 61

      tobey100posted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Maybe for Europe, possibling including the eastern and asian countries.  Not here.  The American spirit would never abide it.  We are more independent than most realize.

      replyreport
   9. 59

      Instrumentallyposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      yea no doubt and no the U.S. will be destroyed.

      replyreport
   10. 59

       qwarkposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       The only chance man has to survive is to be controlled by a 1 world gov't.
       Unfortunately, there is no chance of that happening.
       Humankind is much too fragmented in too many ways to be able to come together to work in concert for its survival.
       I wrote a "hub" about the need for a 1 world gov't months ago.
       http://hubpages.com/hub/qwark19
       I explain why we will, most probably, not survive until that can be realized.
       If you read it , pls leave comments..thanks.  :-)

       replyreport
   11. 61

       sannyasinmanposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       The very question you add to your thread means that you probably don't understand what the NWO is all about, because in the NWO, there will be no USA as such. There will be "superstates" like the European Union, controlled by an unelected, totalitarian,  World Govt.
       
       Have you read 1984 by George Orwell? Are you familiar with DoubleThink and NewSpeak? 
       
       WAR IS PEACE
       FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
       IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
       
       A world with the population under complete control and constant surveillance, spoonfed propaganda via the media, and divided into 3 superstates, fighting a permanent war against in invisible enemy, whom he calls Emmanuel Goldstein. The equivalent today would be . . . now let me think . . any ideas?
       
       Do you see any parallels, any "coincidences"?

       replyreport
2. 65

   Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years ago

   Nah, there will be an Armageddon situation first.

   replyreport
3. 64

   ChapmanHesterposted 15 years ago

   No the US Will not be at the helm people! Nor will any other government... NEW WORLD GOVERNMENT means just that new... well to us atleast... The rights and freedoms that we have become accustomed to will be revoked.  Concentration camps will enslave all those who resist.  For those who are accepted into this new world RFID Chipping will be mandatory and if you don't have one you won't be able to buy, sell, work, or survive!  Look UP...
   
   DEPOPULATION
   REX 84
   FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS
   NEW WORLD ORDER
   THE AMERO
   NORTH AMERICAN UNION

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Ghost32posted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Not a bad post, but I'd have to say:  Concentration camps will enslave all those who resist UNSUCCESFULLY.  It ain't over till it's over.  And I don't just mean U.S. militia-minded types.  You really think folks like Al-Qaeda are going to lie down and roll over for "bosses" running around with RFID chips?  The conspiracy to cram us all under one governmental umbrella is without question real...but so is the tendency of groups of people to fly apart as fast as they're compressed together.

      replyreport
4. 59

   The Ropeposted 15 years ago

   Eventually yes, near - no, probably not in my lifetime, and I've a few prime years to go (if I'm lucky).  US or any other government, probably not.  To jump start your module, think of federal vs state government and then improve on it...

   replyreport
5. 72

   earnestshubposted 15 years ago

   It is hard enough to get consensus on trade issues let alone to ensure that there is world government. Who would agree to it?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Earn:
      "Who would agree to it" would not be the concern.
      If the population were to be reduced to level that could be managed well, only those who understood the inevitability of extinction, if change was not instituted, would be acceptable and allowed to exist.
      The kind of 1 world gov't that would be needed would be one that would be TOTALLY dedicated to survival as a species.
      Humans would be selected for their genetic aptitudes.
      Genetic engineering would be utilized to guarantee dedication to the goal and to necessary esoteric function.
      Belief in supernatural divinities would be crushed and eliminated by education/training. If any displayed an affinity for such beliefs they would either be destoyed or assigned to the gov't for genetic re-programming.
      The 1 world gov't would, necessarily, have to be "Machiavellian" in it's efforts to govern and control. Opposition would be immediately and permanently ended.
      it is my opinion that a 1 world gov't cannot be created. It's much too late.
      Man is headed for a cataclysmic reduction in population and once that has begun and ended. No one can prognosticate the future of all life on this planet.
      Evolution will continue, in a slow and tedious movement toward who knows what.,

      replyreport
      1. 76

         aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         My case rests... this is a classic example of NWO/New Age double think and gobbledegook...
         
         Quark will probably volunteer to guillotine those pesky folk who had "Belief in supernatural divinities"...
         
         Amazing, we are soooo very close!

         replyreport
         1. 59

            qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

            hey quick"
            I'd kinda take the attitude of roman catholics during the dark ages...if I couldn't convince one to change to our way of thinking, drawing and quartering" would be my choice of execution...lol :-)

            replyreport
6. 68

   Arthur Fontesposted 15 years ago

   When the economy is globalized which it pretty much is with the World Bank, the IMF Along with centralized banks all over the world. 
   
   The world will be controlled by international bankers.  Being able to provide credit as well as take it away will keep the countries in line.
   
   If a country refuses to participate credit is frozen, food or seed sales stop and the country will be starved into submission.
   
   Military will be given funding as the bankers decide.
   
   Those that control currency control the world.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Cagsilposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      This depends completely on the fact that the "status quo" doesn't change.

      replyreport
      1. 68

         Arthur Fontesposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         Absolutely the pieces are not all in place yet the climate agenda must also be included in the policy.

         replyreport
7. 0

   Brenda Durhamposted 15 years ago

   People like....Henry Kissinger maybe...
   People like... Hilary Clinton, who became a fervent supporter of Obama after she saw he was gonna win the Presidential nomination.  And Obama.  And any other liberal socialist tyrannical power-loving jerk.
   
   Didn't anyone notice how stilted and robotic her speech was when she told everyone to "If you were gonna vote for me, now place your votes for Obama"?
   Doesn't anyone notice still how stilted and unfeeling Obama is?
   It's like some entity has power over them;  they're puppets on strings;  at least that's how it looks half the time.
   The other half, they're simply....liberal socialist tyrannical power-loving jerks....

   replyreport
   1. 68

      Arthur Fontesposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      During the campaign both Hillary and Obama announced they were going home to rest at the same time.
      
      They both attended a Bilderberger meeting during their rest.
      
      Hillary made the decision to support Obama shortly after that.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         SirDentposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         if I am not mistaken, both Bushes attended Bilderberger meetings also. A lot of those who we read about are members. No one really knows what goes on at those meetings. I know there are many reporters who tells us what happens, but how do we know they are reliable?
         
         To establish a New World Government, population must be decreased dramatically. There are just way to many people to control and keep a consensus on.

         replyreport
   2. 72

      Cagsilposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      All politicians are puppets on strings of business, which are mostly controlled by bankers, of course they in it for the money.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         SirDentposted 15 years agoin reply to this

         I almost completely agree with this. I think about .001% of politicians are legit.

         replyreport
         1. 59

            The Ropeposted 15 years agoin reply to this

            What's the old saying?  "Anyone who is qualified to run the country, is too smart to want the job".

            replyreport
   3. 84

      donotfearposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      
      

      replyreport
8. 0

   Brenda Durhamposted 15 years ago

   Population is already being decreased by the touting of abortion and same-sex "rights".

   replyreport
   1. 0

      SirDentposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      That isn't nearly enough to do what needs done. Population needs to decrease by about 80% or so. Of course a good conspiracy theory could come from all this. Oh wait, there are a lot of those already.

      replyreport
9. 68

   Arthur Fontesposted 15 years ago

   If our current science czar could implement his dreams.  The population would be sterilized through the food and water supplies.

   replyreport
   1. 77

      Bard of Elyposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      This is underway with all the fluoride in the water supplies leading to infertility!

      replyreport
10. 61

    saltposted 15 years ago

    If you watched the presidental swearing in, George Bush interfered and tried to pretend that it was his election. There was alot of energy being channelled, projected etc.. thats what people have to understand and work with.. you can create the negative with fear.. feel no fear and it cannot happen.

    replyreport
11. 0

    khmohsinposted 15 years ago

    A single world government had been a dream of many in past, but it never got fulfilled by anyone. And it is much more difficult nowadays to do so. And even if anyone will manage to form such a government it will never last long.

    replyreport
12. 75

    cheaptrickposted 15 years ago

    God bless the Militias.

    replyreport
13. 0

    Audreveaposted 15 years ago

    Maybe Australia should be in charge for a while, 'cos we really haven't had a turn.
    
    You can run the world drinking beer & watching cricket, right?

    replyreport
    1. 76

       aguasilverposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       Oh Please DO let the Ozzies have a go, beer and cricket.... they'd get voted in as world rulers, wouldn't need the intrigue!

       replyreport
14. 69

    akihanposted 15 years ago

    we'd never learn to live with each other. that's the sad fact of all history. perhaps until we have aliens appearing attacking us then will we unite as a species.

    replyreport
15. 68

    AdsenseStrategiesposted 15 years ago

    Imagine this was 1910 and not 2010, and then ask someone to predict what would happen over the next, say, fifty years.
    
    Lots of insane predictions, like:
    
    - the Fall of Czarist Russia and its replacement by a never-before-seen "Communist" government
    
    - women getting the vote (as if!)
    
    - almost everyone (in the West) owning a car
    
    - hugely wide access to radio and telephones
    
    - two world wars
    
    - nuclear weapons
    
    - the fall of the British Empire.
    
    I could go on.
    
    The point is that trying to predict the future is a pretty hit-and-miss business. As someone wrote somwhere recently, five or six years ago there was no such thing either as Facebook or Youtube... so try predicting things twenty or thirty years from now...

    replyreport
16. 0

    shazwellynposted 15 years ago

    I think there will be.  If we want world peace there has to be some common rules under one power.  I only hope that it will be ruled as empowerers rather than controllers.
    
    Campaign for a utopia! xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    replyreport
17. 60

    Jeramiposted 15 years ago

    I am truly curious as to which scripture people are referring to when "The One world government" is being discussed.
       Is this found only in Rev 13 ?

    replyreport
18. 67

    Daniel Carterposted 15 years ago

    I think the only way to be free is to be self governing based on taking full responsibility of our lives. Instead of expecting a government to take care of us, we should learn to care for ourselves. However, there will be times when we may be unable to do that for ourselves, and if we are of similar mind-set, compassion can help make up the difference.
    
    But as humans, this utopian environment is likely not going to happen. In history, it can only occur for brief periods and then dissolves quickly based on new comers, or youngsters who don't want to live by the hogwash they believe has been perpetrated on them.
    
    So we are pretty much stuck with an "equalizer" to enforce fairness and equality instead of we ourselves being able to live by it. The lesser of the evils, we thought in the US, was capitalism and the free-market system, with a democratic government. But as of late we can see that foundation has all but crumbled completely and we are teetering, ready for collapse.
    
    Still, I say it's all the more reason for us to look inward instead of outward to find the answers we need.
    
    Whether or not we have a World Order Government, our lives will not really get any better until we do the dirty work of reaching inside ourselves and deciding what our values and principles are and living by them, instead of this horrible greed/opportunist/put-each-other-down attitude that seems to prevail now.

    replyreport
19. 65

    Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years ago

    The NWO is supposedly the financial institutions. Everything will be to keep those who are rich even more powerful, and those that aren't will basically become slaves. Like I said before though, we'll destroy ourselves or something before this ever comes to light.

    replyreport
    1. 61

       sannyasinmanposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       The NWO want complete control. For example, there will be no cash money at all. Instead, they will insert a chip under your skin with which you will pay for everything. However, this chip is programmable and so if you are a bad boy, or step out of line in any way, they can switch it off. This means you can't buy ANYTHING, even food. How is that for keeping you in line!
       
       And, as we know the chips (RFID chips) are already here and being inserted into humans right now.

       replyreport
20. 59

    TradePlumbingposted 15 years ago

    See if this sounds familiar...
    
    Manufacture a universal and immediate threat that people barely understand but can be terrified of, and they'll allow those in power to do whatever they like as long as they commit to dealing with that threat?
    
    The Bush Administration and the Patriot Act?  Nope. I was actually thinking of Chancellor Palpatine in Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith
    
    The only way I can ever see that happening on a world-wide scale would be in the event of an alien invasion. Even then, I highly doubt those "in authority" would be able to agree on anything in time to put up any sort of resistance.
    
    I love the Roddenbery theory that the discovery of intelligent alien life "unites mankind in a way no-one thought possible when they realise they're not alone." but sadly I can't see it happening

    replyreport
21. 65

    Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years ago

    Ok, for arguments sake, if it were going to happen, we wouldn't just allow it to happen. The financial institutions would make us all so poor, there wouldnt be much we could do to stop it.

    replyreport
22. 84

    donotfearposted 15 years ago

    I pray not........

    replyreport
    1. 59

       qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       Donotfear:
       ..praying is not gonna help!
       The "wheels" are grinding. Too much momentum to stop.

       replyreport
       1. 61

          tobey100posted 15 years agoin reply to this

          I seem to remember that's what was said of Hitler and Japan in the 30's and 40's.  Both were stopped DEAD!

          replyreport
          1. 59

             qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

             tobey.
             In no way relative.
             Re-think and try again...:-)

             replyreport
             1. 61

                tobey100posted 15 years agoin reply to this

                Re-think?  Ok, try this...one world government is nothing more than a 'they're out to get us all' theory (ranks right up there with the Jews control all the banks) that's been around since the mid 1700's.  Ranks right up there with the Masons control the world and designed Washington DC as a giant secret symbol that transmits a message to the aliens that populated this planet as a 12th grade biology assignment and when it comes time to turn in their work we're all done for.  Better?

                replyreport
                1. 65

                   Wayne Orvisburgposted 15 years agoin reply to this

                   Do you mean to tell me that Jews don't run all the banks and the Masons don't control the world?? Damn! I've been dooped again!

                   replyreport
                   1. 61

                      tobey100posted 15 years agoin reply to this

                      Sorry, thought you knew?

                      replyreport
                2. 59

                   qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

                   tobey:
                   Funny :-) but not relevant.
                   Re-think and try again.

                   replyreport
                   1. 61

                      tobey100posted 15 years agoin reply to this

                      No thanks, rather not.

                      replyreport
23. 59

    qwarkposted 15 years ago

    BRB..:-)

    replyreport
24. 62

    alexandriaruthkposted 15 years ago

    nation will always be govern by the subdivision geographically,
    
    economically we will be as one, but then politically we will still be subdivided

    replyreport
    1. 59

       qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       Hi alexandria;
       Ya can't think in terms of how mankind is contemporarily governed.
       Ya gotta think in terms of what is necessary for the human species to survive.
       Imagine! Based upon what is happening in terms of "macro" management.
       What you speak of is "micro" management and as man currently exists, "micro" management is not functional when referencing the broad scope of "survival."
       It's too late tho to consider that there is a possibility a that 1 world gov't could be created and operated successfully.

       replyreport
       1. 62

          alexandriaruthkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

          I understand, could it be just a dream?

          replyreport
          1. 59

             qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

             Alexandria:
             At the moment it can be nothing but a "dream."
             Humanity is so fragmented in so many ways, most involved with abject, global ignorance, that with an exploding human population (we'll reach about 9 - 10 billion within 2 generations)mankind cannot gain global control b4 human population is reduced to a level of managability.
             Just my opinion. If ya have another, pls share it.

             replyreport
25. 66

    awareposted 15 years ago

    we must act like a planet of people . but thats light years away

    replyreport
    1. 59

       qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       Topic:
       Wait! We are acting like "people."
       We evolved as earths prime predator. We are genetically programmed to "kill."
       Don't'cha mean we should sublimate that "need" for the kill and replace it with a kinder and more socially responsive programming?...'course that'll take many many tens of thousands of years..eh? :-)

       replyreport
26. 66

    awareposted 15 years ago

    must imply s start.

    replyreport
    1. 59

       qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

       what does this mean: "must imply s start.?"

       replyreport
       1. 59

          qwarkposted 15 years agoin reply to this

          Aware:
          This was meant for you;
          "Wait! We are acting like "people."
          We evolved as earths prime predator. We are genetically programmed to "kill."
          Don't'cha mean we should sublimate that "need" for the kill and replace it with a kinder and more socially responsive programming?...'course that'll take many many tens of thousands of years..eh?" :-)

          replyreport
27. 84

    donotfearposted 14 years ago

    NO to World government. Period. It would mean the end.

    replyreport
28. 73

    Reality Bytesposted 14 years ago

    There is already a global government controlled by international financiers.  They lend enough to a country until it defaults on payments.  Then they move in to confiscate the real property.  Lend money on a fractional reserve basis.  Create loans out of air.  Then recoup your interests in material wealth.  Air for gold, good deal.  Every country is indebted to this global monstrosity of world governance.

    replyreport
29. 69

    MikeNVposted 14 years ago

    Whomever controls the money controls the world.

    replyreport
    1. 77

       wildernessposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       And when the Wal-Mart/Toyota merger is complete............

       replyreport
30. 60

    Dominionmaster2posted 14 years ago

    We are standing on the verge of a global economy, and thus a global government, but you can't really call it a government, it's basically the removal of your sovereignty and being placed in the hands of the global elite who already run this country to begin with. To me this is scary, through my research into this subject I have come to discover that it is very real as well. If the G8 succeed in removing the us dollar and going to whatever monetary system they choose, we will all be in deep shit!

    replyreport
31. 56

    Sab Ohposted 14 years ago

    Also, Big Foot and the Loch Ness Monster are members of this evil global elite!

    replyreport
    1. 60

       Dominionmaster2posted 14 years agoin reply to this

       Sab, I would not leave anyone out at this point, I'm Just sayin!!!!!!!

       replyreport
32. 0

    ericsomethingposted 14 years ago

    OK, call me a conspiracy nut, but I do see it happening.
    After the U.S. has its butt handed to it. I really see that happening, too.
    Hope I'm wrong.

    replyreport
    1. 0

       china manposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       History tells us that countries with plans of world government - just a new name for world domination - usually get their asses kicked. Though it is usually bankrupt countries with no way else to go that try, and the US is drifting in the general direction. But it also takes cash, even the US cannot gear up without the money and most of the opposition can call in their loans to collapse the US economy if it tried to kick off.  Not paying would have the same general effect as its world trade would collapse if its credit is no longer good.

       replyreport
33. 78

    brimancandyposted 9 years ago

    No. I don't see there ever being a world government. Mainly because there are still too many cultures that don't understand each other, and don't wan to understand each other.
    
    Than there are people like the United States who attack other countries based on a humanitarian crisis, when millions of people are living in cardboard boxes in our cities, or starving to death, freezing to death just because they can't afford shelter or food. Why isn't there a country coming to rescue us?
    
    The most disturbing new trend is ethnic fighting, where people in Iraq are killing their own people because they assume they are better than the people they are killing.
    
    How can we have a world order when people in one country can get along?

    replyreport