Left-Wing Rhetoric Is Driving Violence in America
I believe the violence we see tearing through our country today is not random. It is the inevitable result of dehumanizing, inflammatory rhetoric coming from the left, from Congress, from left-leaning media, and from online mobs. These are not isolated acts. This is a culture built and sustained by those who refuse to accept President Trump or MAGA as legitimate.
Violent Acts That Cannot Be Ignored
We’ve seen the consequences in blood. The 2017 congressional baseball shooting, where James Hodgkinson targeted Republican lawmakers, was no accident. His hatred was stoked by the way left voices portrayed conservatives as enemies of the people. Rep. Steve Scalise nearly died in that attack.
Twice now, Donald Trump has been directly targeted. In July 2024, shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire at a rally in Pennsylvania, grazing Trump’s ear and killing an attendee. Then, in September 2024, Ryan Routh attempted an assassination at Trump’s Florida golf club and was later convicted of trying to kill the president. These are clear attempts, not abstract threats.
Just weeks ago, conservative leader Charlie Kirk was murdered by a rooftop sniper while speaking at Utah Valley University. That was no random act, it was a political execution.
Then yesterday in Dallas, an ICE facility was attacked. A gunman opened fire, killing a detainee and seriously wounding others. His ammunition was marked “ANTI-ICE.” That is not vague political violence; that is ideology transformed into bullets.
These events are not coincidences. They are pieces of a dangerous pattern: when radicals feel legitimized by rhetoric from the left, some will act on it.
The Words That Light the Fuse
The left talks about “words matter.” Fine, let’s focus on their words.
Hillary Clinton has repeatedly used language that delegitimizes Trump and his supporters. In a 2019 interview, she said:
“No, it doesn’t kill me because he knows he’s an illegitimate president.”
The Washington Post
“You know, Jane, it was like applying for a job and getting 66 million letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado.”
That language doesn’t just criticize — it declares an enemy. It paints Trump and his supporters not just as flawed, but as evil to be resisted.
In other cases, top Democrats and media personalities routinely portray MAGA and Trump supporters as existential threats, framing them as enemies of democracy, as fascists, as criminals. That kind of rhetoric doesn’t de-escalate; it escalates.
On social media, radicals and trolls take that rhetoric and magnify it tenfold: calling Trump supporters “Nazis,” urging “resistance” in the streets, celebrating violence as justified. Such violent language spreads in echo chambers and primes unstable people to act.
The Pattern Is Clear
I will not excuse this. I will not let it be spun as “fringe” or “isolated.” There’s a clear, dangerous chain: rhetoric from left-wing leaders → amplification by media → radicalization in social media → violent acts in the real world.
When you treat a president as illegitimate, when you demonize the movement of tens of millions as fascist or criminal, when you call your political enemies enemies of democracy, you are setting fire to the public square. And now we see the flames.
My View
I believe left-wing rhetoric is mainly responsible for the violence we see today. I point the blame squarely at the halls of Congress, the left-wing media spreading hate daily, and the social media mobs that treat conservatives as enemies to be destroyed. They designed a culture of “resistance”, and this is the harvest.
Until the left accepts accountability for the fires they’ve ignited, the violence will continue. And every time it happens, I will remind people: left-wing rhetoric is not mere talk, it is the spark for radical crime.May want to point JD to a mirror...Vance wants everyone to stop calling people who they disagree with Nazis...but most of us remember when he called Trump “America’s Hitler.”
Shar,
We saw the high level of violence the left is capable of during the George Floyd riots. It's not gotten any better. The left is incapable of engaging in honest political discourse because it requires a level of thinking and understanding that is beyond most of them. It would also require something unknown to the left, being honest.
In an open and honest debate the left will always get destroyed. The intense flaws in their ideas are always easy to illustrate.
Just watching a few simple videos of Charlie Kirk debating them proves that.
They don't have what it takes either morally or intellectually to participate in a debate of ideas. They say nothing the majority of Americans want to hear.
That is why they must resort to violence. It is all they have left to get attention.I couldn’t agree more. We’ve all witnessed how, when the left is faced with facts and reasoned debate, they fall apart because their positions can’t stand up to scrutiny. That’s why they so often turn to shouting, intimidation, and worse. Charlie Kirk is a prime example. Time after time, he calmly dismantles their arguments, and their only response is to lash out. Violence has become their fallback because they can’t win on ideas. The majority of Americans want common sense, not the chaos the left keeps pushing.
For me, this isn’t up for debate. It’s non-negotiable. I see the left’s vile rhetoric as directly fueling the violence we’re seeing across the country. Their upside-down ideology has created a real violence problem. From the Catholic school shooting, to Charles’ murder, to today’s attack on ICE—it all points back, in my view, to the poisonous rhetoric of the left.Shar,
I think this article in the Atlantic puts things in perspective.
Left-Wing Terrorism Is on the Rise
For the first time in more than 30 years, attacks by the far left outnumber those by the far right.
No matter how hard ideologues try to exclusively blame their political foes for acts of political violence, the truth is that violent extremists today emerge from across the political spectrum. We have studied this problem and believe that our data can help illuminate an issue too often defined by partisan finger-pointing. As part of a study to be published this week by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, we compiled and analyzed a data set of 750 attacks and plots in the United States from January 1, 1994, to July 4, 2025. Our research focuses only on incidents of terrorism, which we define as attacks or plots by a nonstate actor attempting to achieve a political end and exert a psychological influence on a broad population. Among other details, the data set includes the types of weapons used, the intended targets, the number of fatalities, and the ideology of the perpetrators.
We found that left-wing terrorism has increased since President Donald Trump’s rise to political prominence in 2016. Indeed, 2025 marks the first time in more than 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumber those from the far right. Despite its recent increase, however, left-wing terrorism is not nearly as common today as it was in the 1960s and early ’70s. Those years marked the height of groups such as the Weather Underground and the Symbionese Liberation Army, best known for kidnapping the newspaper heiress Patty Hearst. In the ’80s and early ’90s, left-wing terrorism declined while jihadist and right-wing terrorism rose, particularly in the forms of anti-government and white-supremacist violence.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar … sm/684323/Mike, this is alarming, but it’s an important reality check. The fact that left-wing attacks now outnumber far-right attacks for the first time in over 30 years cannot be ignored. Violence isn’t confined to one ideology; regardless of politics, innocent lives are at risk, and our society suffers when extremism goes unchecked.
What’s particularly troubling is how much of this violence is fueled by toxic rhetoric. When political leaders or media outlets constantly demonize their opponents, it creates an environment where extreme actions feel justified to some. We can’t just track the numbers; we have to confront the culture and the words that drive people toward violence.
It’s also clear that our American values and ideals will not accept ideological shifts from the left, whether socialist-leaning or otherwise, that conflict with the principles we respect as truly American. In reality, there is no mending.
The question is urgent: how do we stop this? How do we hold those promoting hateful or radicalizing rhetoric accountable and prevent more attacks before more lives are lost?Shar,
It's time for the left to own this violence and do something about it.
I don't think that will happen.
They will choose to live in a state of denial and remain in their leftist rhetoric filled bubble.
Nothing destroys their bubble better than facts, truth, and reality.Nothing destroys their bubble better than facts, truth, and reality."
I must agree...Shar,
All of the violence against ICE agents are the responsibility of the democrats.
All the things democrat leaders have called members of ICE has only fueled the fire of the left wing lunatics. These democrat leaders are simply evil.
I hope there is at least a molecule of decency in them and they stop all of their dangerous rhetoric. I may be expecting too much of them.
Again, the two things democrats love more than anything are illegal aliens and criminals. They have no time for legal immigrants or law abiding citizens.
And they wonder why significant numbers of people are leaving their party.
What kind of person would want to be part of an organization that behaves like that?Mike, I completely agree. The violence directed at ICE agents didn’t happen in a vacuum — it’s fueled by the rhetoric coming from Democratic leaders who constantly demonize law enforcement. Their words give permission to the radicals and extremists, and it’s no surprise that people are leaving the party in droves. It’s hard to imagine anyone wanting to align themselves with a group that consistently puts illegal aliens and criminals above law-abiding citizens. Their actions and words speak volumes about their priorities.
Shar,
It's almost sad to watch what the democrat party is doing to itself.
The party is imploding like no other American political party before it. They simply are unable to see or comprehend what they are doing wrong.
National poll slaps Democrats with worst rating in key category
'This is the lowest favorability rating for the Democratic party
In what sounds like a broken record, the Democratic Party hit another historic low in a national poll this week.
Thirty percent of voters nationwide questioned in a Quinnipiac University survey said they have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, and 54% say they hold an unfavorable opinion.
"This is the lowest favorability rating for the Democratic Party since the Quinnipiac University Poll began asking voters this question in 2008," the survey's release noted.
The Quinnipiac survey was the latest poll this year to flash red alerts for the Democrats.
The Democratic Party has been in the political wilderness since last year's elections. Not only did the party lose control of the White House and Senate and failed to win back the House majority, but Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nation … y-categoryI agree completely, it really is sad to watch. What stands out to me is that instead of taking responsibility and adjusting their message, Democrats double down with the same leftist rhetoric that voters are clearly rejecting. Meanwhile, we’re seeing a strong surge of new voter registrations with the Republican Party. People are realizing that empty promises and constant division aren’t solutions, and they’re moving toward a party that speaks to their concerns.
And Trump saying he hates half of the country... That's bringing the temperature down? That's adjusting the message LOL???
He has the most hateful mouth out there...I don’t agree. I see him directing his words straight at the problem, and rightly so. Hopefully, they’ll take note and put an end to their hateful rhetoric. He’s the president, and I’d think less of him if he didn’t call it out and make every effort to push back against the radical language they use. They are clearly responsible for the violence we are witnessing. Hey, that's my view.
The reality? Trump has one of the most hateful mouths out there...
"The Words That Light the Fuse
The left talks about “words matter.” Fine, let’s focus on their words."
Do all words matter or just some?? Just the words of the left? Are you asking me to overlook this....
"I HATE MY OPPONENTS""On social media, radicals and trolls take that rhetoric and magnify it tenfold: calling Trump supporters “Nazis,” urging “resistance” in the streets,
But it's okay when Trump calls half of the country fascist, marxist, communist?
He's the president of the freaking United States not just a social media troll but it's okay for him?
The original post is condemning ONLY " the left". While completely ignoring the most egregious mouth on the planetTotal bovine excrement in the extreme. Relative to the mass murders committed from those motivated by right wing ideology, Antifa is harmless in comparison.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 … ning-trump
What is the body count for this loose affiliation, know as Antifa? All the more reason that I despise Trump and his tyrannical tirade. This is censorship pure and simple by a deplorable right wing determined to silence all opposition. All of this makes me like conservatives less, each passing day.
Does violence today include the slaughters at retail outlets within the last 4 years? I think that rises to the top of the bloodletting. The pattern is anything but clear on the contrary, you folks are making the left some unholy bogeyman when still everybody knows that the radical right is the most dangerous despite all the eloquent equivocation that seems to be the style to dismiss the reality of where we are.
What about the rhetoric from right wing leaders, Trump being at the head? Freedom of speech allows me to say what I want about anyone without the fear of being prosecuted. The First Amendment of freedom of speech has rare and few exceptions. What is it about sticks and stones? Trump is just using this to silence dissent and I promise 100 percent resistance to this, to him, and everything he stands for.
The conflict we all talk about wanting to avoid is all the more certain to come, just wait for it.
FBI and other law enforcement officials have stated that no definitive motive or ideology has been identified for Thomas Matthew Crooks, the gunman who shot Donald Trump at a July 2024 rally.
The motive for the Kirk murder? What has been determined?
Surely we know more about the ideology of Robinson by now? Right?
"That language doesn’t just criticize — it declares an enemy. It paints Trump and his supporters not just as flawed, but as evil to be resisted."
And what does this language do??
https://x.com/micah_erfan/status/1966667619148222843"I always say, we have two enemies,"
"That language doesn’t just criticize — it declares an enemy...
Like this?
Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries....Democrats I call him the enemy from within,"Maybe take some time to look into the woman he was referring to. I’ve done some research myself, and the context goes far beyond anything Trump has ever said. The video you shared, in my view, actually shows Trump describing Harris’s ideologies almost perfectly. On many occasions, Harris’s own comments have fit the very definition of fascism, as well as socialism and even Marxism. I mean, one can find all on YouTube. It's wonderful that we have great technology to pull up what one says in live settings. I am not adding examples; I see no reason to smear this woman. Anyone interested can do their own mucking about.
And regarding your post about the ideologies of those who picked up a gun to kill or attempt to kill… I believe it’s up to each individual to form their own opinion about motive. As for me, I see it as these men were influenced by the constant hate rhetoric coming from the left, from what I’ve witnessed in the halls of Congress, to the nightly media talking heads, and even the keyboard hate junkies online. That’s my view.His comment wasn't directed toward ONE person when he called Democrats" the enemy from within"
He has consistently used language that has vilified an entire group of people come on... Does it all have to be repeated??
"I HATE my opponent and I don’t want the best for them"In my view, Trump was speaking his truth. I believe the Democratic Party has become the “enemy within.” I’ve seen their terrible tactics for years, long before Trump. They’ve tried every ploy they can, and they’ve intensified those vile attacks against him, but he’s still standing. He’s exposed them, and I hope more people will see how ugly their tactics are when laid bare.
Ok...how do you reconcile that view with the OP???
"That language doesn’t just criticize — it declares an enemy.
But it's okay for Trump to do it???Shar,
I believer President Donald Trump is well within the realm of understanding to feel as he feels after what was done to him by the democrats.
They sunk to a level of low this country has never seen before and I hope never sees again.
They were so terrified of him getting back into the White House that they tried every dirty trick in the book and still came up short. They tried to put him in jail, bankrupt him, impeach him, all because he was connecting with the American people better than the democrats. Nothing they did stopped the American people from choosing President Donald Trump as president.
It is so beautiful he won the presidency by winning both the popular vote and the Electoral College. He overcame so much of the absolute disgusting tactics of the democrat party.Gotcha...so it's ok for POTUS to declare his HATE for half the country...
"Gotcha...so it's ok for POTUS to declare his HATE for half the country..."Willow
Yes, you’re damn right—it is okay. In my view, a president’s job is not to pander to everyone or avoid tough truths; it’s to stand firm for the country he believes in. If some of the country is actively undermining him, spreading lies about him, and attacking his agenda, it’s understandable for him to feel and express strong opposition. And he does a great job at giving back what he got. He says it like it is...and I so appreciate him doing so. He is pointing out the truth.Okay so I'm supposed to get worked up over everyone but Trump saying mean things but when Trump spews hateful shit he's got a pass....got it.
The original post is completely undermined... Not sure how anyone can complain about angry rhetoric when pure hate is flowing like a river out of Trump's big mouth .. sounds a lot like a double standard. Silly me for thinking a president should rise to a higher standard LOLTrump’s absolutely right to call out the radical left for fueling violence against ICE and conservatives. I’ve heard his words firsthand, and nothing he’s said strikes me as anything but plausible and relevant. He has the same free speech rights as anyone else. Funny thing is, just the other day you were defending a talk show host’s “right” to smear MAGA and even pin Charlie Kirk’s death on Trump supporters; that’s beyond off-base, and it exposes the hypocrisy. The left has been playing this game for years, backing censorship of American citizens on Twitter, Google, YouTube, and Facebook, while pretending they’re the champions of free speech. The reality? Trump’s words ring true to millions, and if that makes some people uncomfortable, too bad.
He said he hates his opponents.. and he said it with a real fervor in his tone... It would be a whole lot easier for some folks just to say that Trump professing hate for half the country is perfectly fine with them and that they don't see any harm in that... But I don't want to hear about what anyone else has to say then
Ugly rhetoric can be called out equally but there's really no excuse to make it one-sided...I see no harm in his words or his tone, especially considering what he’s dealing with and addressing. Like many Americans, I’ve had more than enough of hearing the left and the Democrats. It’s their own words and actions that have put them in the position they’re in today, with fewer and fewer people respecting anything they say or offer. They’ve had their chance to speak, and it’s clear that more and more Americans are rejecting both their message and their behavior.
If there is no problem in him declaring hate for people of this country then why would folks on here be calling out any type of rhetoric from Democrats or the so-called left? How do you reconcile this with the original post?
Trump is simply not willing to ignore the rhetoric and hate the left continues to foment. And it seems you can’t address the hypocrisy I pointed out. Just the other day, you claimed Kimmel’s free speech was violated, yet now you dismiss Trump’s right to speak freely. He has every right to use his voice, loudly and boldly, even if some find his words disturbing. Some of us believe words must be bold to drive the point home. The left’s rhetoric needs to stop; people are being killed because of their constant hate speech. Sometimes, strong words are the only words that will do when the truth needs to be heard. From where I see it, many on the left are hypocrites; they feel free to use horrific language, but act offended the moment it’s directed back at them.
So why did you condone Kimmel's free speech, but feel you can deny Trump the same rights?This has nothing to do with free speech. No one is questioning free speech... I would ask that you take a look at the original post that began this thread. Maybe an addition should be made to it...."except when Trump does it...."
" This has nothing to do with free speech. No one is questioning free speech... I would ask that you take a look at the original post that began this thread. Maybe an addition should be made to it...."except when Trump does it...." Willow
You diverted to Trump comments you found offensive. I reminded you that Trump has every right to free speech.
My article was not about Trump's words; it is essentially an article that argues that the recent surge in political violence in the U.S. is the direct result of dehumanizing and inflammatory rhetoric from the left, including politicians, media, and online communities, that portrays Trump and his supporters as enemies. This rhetoric, amplified by social media, creates a culture that normalizes hostility and primes individuals to commit violent acts, forming a clear pattern from words to real-world attacks.
You quickly shifted the focus to Trump and engaged in whataboutism. I already shared my thoughts in response to several of your posts. I can only share my perspective, which I have done, now several times. I see no need to add anything further to my piece. You’re free to start a thread on any subject you wish.If one makes a post targeting "the left" one can be certain that all of those statements will be applied to the right.... Why shouldn't all of the statements of the original post, it's premise be applied equally??
How would anyone expect anyone else to be outraged at any of the statements and examples of the original post and just blindly pass over Trump's rhetoric??
It's just such a clear double standard.You are free to post whatever you like in this open chat. I wrote the piece, and it’s yours to accept or ignore. I chose the topic.
In my original article, I intentionally avoided commenting on Trump’s words or tone. Had I addressed it, I would have said that I see no harm in what he has said, especially given the constant attacks, schemes, and falsehoods directed at him by the Democrats. From my perspective, he is speaking very truthfully when confronting the radical left wing of the Democratic Party. Like many Americans, I have grown weary of the endless rhetoric from the left and Democrats, which is why I focused on the subject I did. I feel he is simply giving back as good as he is given, and I have no problem with what he has been sharing lately.
I am not applying a double standard here; I am explaining my reasoning. I see no harm in Trump’s words in this context because of what he has endured, the attacks, falsehoods, and political ploys aimed at him. My view is based on context, intent, and truthfulness, not arbitrarily excusing behavior. Criticism should be measured and consistent, and in this case, I believe his words are justified and necessary. I do not believe the Democrats have the right or any valid reason to have pursued efforts to ruin him with ploys and untrue statements. In my view, those he directs his words at are deserving of the strong words he uses.No harm in Trump's words, no outrage to be had in him declaring hate for half of America but I'm supposed to be upset about the whatever Democrats say... Got it. Trump somehow deserves to say he hates people. Perfectly okay for a president to say he hates fellow Americans...my God.
I think you’re projecting here. Trump has never said he hates half the country. Yes, he hits back hard at Democrats, the radical left, and the media, but that’s not the same as declaring hate for half of America. It appears you are being hyperbolic. What you’re saying doesn’t line up with his actual words. Unless you can quote him, "I hate half of all Americans."
Honestly, it sounds more like you’re recycling Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” line and trying to pin it on Trump."I hate my opponents"
Hate
He hates them
Not sure that there is anything stronger that could be said in a negative way toward individuals other than HATE .
The sitting president of the United States stated that he hates his opponents....Do those statements really amount to hating half of all Americans? I don’t think so. Frankly, I believe he has plenty of valid reasons to despise his opponents, and I can understand why. In all my years, I’ve never seen a political party unleash such vile ploys against one man. And yet, he’s still standing, he’s exposed them for what they are, right out in the open.
In his latest public message to Attorney General Pam Bondi, President Trump explicitly called for the prosecution of three individuals he referred to as “guilty as hell”:
- **James Comey** – former FBI Director
- **Adam Schiff** – Democratic Senator from California
- **Letitia James** – New York Attorney General
Trump’s post on Truth Social expressed frustration that “nothing is going to be done” about these figures, blaming them for his impeachments and indictments. He urged Bondi to act swiftly, saying:
> “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility… JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” (The Statutes of Limitation run out next Tuesday}
He also ousted U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert for allegedly failing to bring charges against James and Comey, and nominated Lindsey Halligan—his former personal lawyer—as Siebert’s replacement.
This pressure campaign is part of a broader pattern where Trump publicly demands legal action against political adversaries, often without specifying the alleged crimes. Legal experts warn this could backfire by undermining due process and fueling claims of selective prosecution.
Trump has publicly named **George Soros** as a “likely candidate” for investigation under his new domestic terrorism directive. In a memorandum signed on September 25, 2025, Trump ordered federal agencies—including the DOJ, FBI, IRS, and Treasury—to investigate liberal groups allegedly tied to political violence. Soros was singled out alongside Reid Hoffman as a potential funder of what Trump called “agitators and anarchists”.
Strategic Context Behind Targeting Soros
1. **Symbolic Villain**
- Soros has long been a lightning rod in right-wing rhetoric, often portrayed as the mastermind behind progressive movements.
- Naming him reinforces a broader narrative of elite liberal orchestration.
2. **Funding Trail**
- Trump’s memo directs agencies to “follow the money,” suggesting Soros’ philanthropic network (Open Society Foundations) could be scrutinized for alleged ties to civil unrest.
-
No evidence has been presented publicly to support these claims.
3. **Political Messaging**
- Targeting Soros energizes Trump’s base and reframes the conversation around “left-wing terrorism.”
- It shifts focus from Trump’s own legal troubles to a broader ideological battle.
4. **Legal Ambiguity**
- The DOJ has not confirmed any active investigation into Soros.
- Attorney General Pam Bondi said “everything is on the table,” but declined to comment on specifics.
---
Soros’ foundation responded by condemning the memo as a “politically motivated attack on civil society” and reaffirmed its commitment to peaceful, lawful activity.
Because they will do anything and say anything that they think even might cause him even a tiny amount of grief. It doesn't need to be true, it doesn't even need to approach truth or reality - they will do and say it anyway.
Wow... So now we're into "intentions"
Of individual speech...
Call out the rhetoric on both sides that is unacceptable for those who hold the highest positions in the land... I certainly have a higher standard and expect more from a president then saying he hates half of the country... That was a sick statement. Especially the way he said it. He's a sick man.
The arguments to dismiss Trump's hateful rhetoric are getting really strained.... It seems it would be better for some folks just to say they agree with his statement about hating people or just state that they don't really care.... The other arguments really just aren't cutting it."Call out the rhetoric on both sides that is unacceptable for those who hold the highest positions in the land... I certainly have a higher standard and expect more from a president then saying he hates half of the country... That was a sick statement. Especially the way he said it. He's a sick man." Willow
You absolutely have the right to share your perspective. But you need to recognize that everyone else has that same right, too. You can call out rhetoric, you can share all of your thoughts, that’s fair. What you don’t have the right to do is badger others simply because they hold a different view.
"The arguments to dismiss Trump's hateful rhetoric are getting really strained.... It seems it would be better for some folks just to say they agree with his statement about hating people or just state that they don't really care.... The other arguments really just aren't cutting it." willow
I’ve already said that I agree with Trump hitting back with words just as strongly as he’s been hit; I’ve repeated this more than once on this thread. What part of that are you not understanding? It seems to me that you simply can’t accept what’s being said. Ultimately, that is your problem."But you need to recognize that everyone else has that same right, too"
Who says I don't recognize that right? Just because I don't agree? I have absolutely never stated that someone couldn't state their opinion or that they didn't have a right to state their opinion.... Disagreeing with many of the opinions on here has nothing to do with "right"
Mike, absolutely, I couldn’t agree more. My view on this is set in stone, not just from what I’ve read or heard, but from my own common sense and watching everything play out before my eyes. The lengths the Democrats went to in order to undermine President Trump were unprecedented, and yet he remained steadfast, resilient, and deeply connected to the American people. They have attempted to play the game of projection, doing all the things they accused Trump and his supporters of, and now they have to live with the consequences. To me, this shows a failed party, one that the majority of Americans are increasingly seeing for what they truly are: the horrific damage they have done to our nation through their ploys, deceit, and violent rhetoric. Watching all of it unfold in real time made it impossible to deny the extraordinary dedication and perseverance President Trump demonstrated in the face of such opposition.
Shar,
Megyn Kelly put things into perspective with someone from the left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdZQc-GgcxEThis video says it all. Who was the one yelling, cutting off Kelly, and refusing to let her speak? Who completely lost his cool as she calmly laid out fact after fact? He walked away furious because the truth was being exposed right in front of him. Kelly stayed composed, professional, and backed her arguments with solid research. Meanwhile, all he could do was spit out Google blurbs and left-wing media talking points. The contrast couldn’t be clearer.
This is the norm for most leftists: don’t listen, dismiss facts and common sense as lies, get angry, throw in some insults, and then shut it all down by diverting or walking away, just like the guy in the video did. The best part? Turning Point’s scheduled venues are still going strong, and Charlie’s show hasn’t skipped a beat.
So you support his statement, of pure hate for his opponent?
"That language doesn’t just criticize — it declares an enemy. It paints Trump and his supporters not just as flawed, but as evil to be resisted.
you mean like this?
"I hate my opponent. And I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry,” Trump said to laughter."
Never to be out done... Bonus points to him for spewing this at an actual memorial service....WOWTrump haw used the word "evil" to describe Democrats or journalists 11 times during the first six months of his second term....
Is this positive? A great quality for a POTUS ?
For Trump, Domestic Adversaries Are Not Just Wrong, They Are ‘Evil’ - The New York Times https://share.google/5g6fYMD3CRAmNH1dFEvery president of the United States has opponents, but have we ever heard a president declare his hatred for them?
By the way, still waiting on the details of the long-fought war between Cambodia and Armenia.... Please, I'm sure somebody wants to brag about the peace deal that was brokered, right??
I'm hoping that Armenia got everything they were asking for!
Just a real feather in Trump's cap huh?
Related Discussions
- 435
The Frightening Violence of the Left
by Readmikenow 9 days ago
During the last few months the violence of the left has been put on full display. A health care executive is executed outside his hotel, Tela's are firebombed, IVF clinics are torched, Governor Shapiro's house in Pennsylvania is set on fire.The common thread in all of these incidents is they...
- 277
NO SHOES NO SHIRTS NO CONSERVATIVES!
by Sharlee 8 months ago
This past week Maxine Waters asked her flock to harass our presidents Cabinet and those that support Trump. Some of the media has followed up on her discriminatory words and pushed the concept of harassing American citizens for their political views. It's amazing that this form of pure...
- 2
What will it take to end violence in America?
by realtalk247 10 years ago
What will it take to end violence in America?How are 10 killed and 55 wounded in a 8 hour time frame in the City of Chicago? Constantly we hear of death tolls in high murder areas such as Chicago, IL / South Central Los Angeles (CA)/ New Orleans, LA, and Camden, NJ. Among the dead, 7 year old...
- 38
Can We Say This is an Incitement of Violence Yet?
by J Conn 2 years ago
Trump between 1 a.m. and 2 a.m. last night:“What kind of person can charge another person, in this case a former president of the United States, who got more votes than any sitting president in history, and leading candidate (by far!) for the Republican Party nomination, with a crime, when it is...
- 87
Attempted Assassination: TRUMP Security Steps In to Take The HIT in OH
by Susie Lehto 9 years ago
He was sweating bullets after that attack. Trump used humor after the attempt to calm the crowd down. Scary moment! Donald Trump Has Close Call in Dayton, Secret Service Steps in to Protect - they were ready to take a bullet for Trump in Dayton, Ohio. Video: ...
- 43
The Great American Divide: Gratitude vs. Bitterness
by Sharlee 2 months ago
There was once a time, not so long ago, when Americans disagreed over policy but shared a common love for country. That time has passed. Today, it feels as though we are not simply two parties or political factions, we are two different nations coexisting uneasily within the same borders. The...