Hate-Mongering Liberal Speaks Ill of the Dead

Jump to Last Post 1-39 of 39 discussions (233 posts)

0
Longhunterposted 11 years ago
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2 … itbart_com

Just another hate-filled, loud-mouth Liberal proving his complete and utter stupidity.
reply report
1. 0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yup, he's speaking from his own hate-filled evil heart.
  Malloy's mouth needs taped and he needs sued, him and/or whatever media that is that allows him to be on the air. Reckon that's coming, at least I hope. There's a fine line between airing one's opinion publicly, and spouting such slanderous vileness.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm just sitting back and waiting to see how many HubPages Liberals think Malloy's comments were okay but scream and cry about what Limbaugh said.
  
  The double standard of the left is very telling about the people they really are.
  reply report
  64
  I am DB Cooperposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Malloy and Limbaugh are both pigs and what they said was disgusting, but from a legal perspective there is a clear distinction. Saying "I'm glad somebody is dead" is vile and hateful, but it's not slander. Saying "this person is a slut" could be considered slanderous.
  
  I would hope Malloy and Limbaugh would both have the decency to step down and fade into obscurity as a form of self-punishment for their comments. I know that will never happen, but I can hope.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm sure a lot of Liberals would just love to see Limbaugh step down. I doubt it will happen.
  reply report
  59
  American Romanceposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I normaly believe we should be civil to each other but I am flabbergasted the excitement of Limbaughs statements by the left? Sandra Fluke said she needed $3000 dollars a year for birth control? It can be purchased from Walmart with a planned parenthood prescription for $5 dollars a month?........Now in trying to be politicaly correct here I admit we cannot call Fluke a WHORE because she seems to be giving it away and a whore would have to be getting paid for her services!.........so can we call her a NYMPHO?..........while on the subject why doesnt she just run an add saying all boys who bring their own condoms can have sex with me?......I honestly believe this would solve her money woes! My lengthy point here is to say if Bill Maher can call a nice woman like Palin a slut or cunty with no basis whatsoever then certainly we can all call Fluke a whore for needing 3000 dollars worth of pills, condoms, and whatever else she must need for her huge shopping list of sexual tools!
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You're almost as hateful, inaccurate and ridiculous as Limbaugh.
  reply report
  69
  bgamallposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The advertisers spoke and left Limpaw. He is a beast and they were smart to leave him. I quit listening to Limpaw when he said that the housing bubble was a figment of the liberal drive by media's imagination.
  
  I wonder how much that cost his listeners over the years! He is a putz.
  reply report
  89
  livelongerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That hasn't been demonstrated. Care to eat your words?
  
  But the fact that you and Brenda, if you are to be taken as examples of the right, have called Malloy hate-filled, loud-mouthed, and evil-hearted, while not using the same sort of language to describe Limbaugh or any of the right-wing shock jocks, means you should be directing your invective closer to home.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As I stated below, LL, what Limbaugh said was childish and inappropriate.
  
  What Malloy said was directed at a man who's dead, can't defend himself, and at the dead man's family.
  
  I can only assure the cute, little girl in the photo is yours so I'll ask. Would you want her to hear those words spoken of you if, God forbid, you died?
  
  As the father of three children myself, I somehow doubt it.
  reply report
  60
  Josakposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  On behalf of liberals I would like to apologize for that stupid comment by Malloy, it always disgusts me to hear people taking the political agenda beyond someone's grave when they can no longer respond, regardless of who does it, it's not right.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Very well put, Josak, but be careful. I can only imagine there will be some who will now be mad at you for apologizing "On behalf of liberals."
  
  Sadly, some will agree with what Malloy said while in the next breath, scream for Limbaugh's head.
  reply report
  89
  livelongerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, I see the distinction.
  
  Limbaugh for calling a living woman a slut & prostitute: childish and inappropriate (isn't that what Romney said?)
  
  Malloy for saying he's happy a dead man is dead: hate-filled, loud-mouth, evil-hearted.
  
  No liberal Hubber has defended Malloy's comments, and yet you hope & pray that they will so your claim that "this site is a wing of the Socialist Party" will somehow make sense.
  
  I really do see a distinction.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The distinction is Breitbart isn't around to defend himself, having only his grieving family left behind to hear Malloy's vile words.
  
  What Limbaugh said, while childish and inappropriate, wasn't said about someone recently passed, with a family left to hear. For what it's worth, she's now getting her 15 minutes of fame and the money to go along with it.
  
  I hope and pray when you die you have no enemies that will say the same about you within ear shot of that little girl, LL, but, of course, you won't be around to endure it. Only she will.
  
  Have a good evening, LL.
  reply report
  89
  livelongerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Another person, unsurprisingly a right-wing partisan, who's claiming that I'm defending Malloy. I'm not, and no one else is in this thread.
  
  What I disputed is the double standard: condemning Malloy in harsh terms, but giving the mildest reproof to Limbaugh.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's more than a little obvious where you stand, LL.
  reply report
  0
  Brenda Durhamposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Indeed. You got your demonstration when livelonger posted!
  He compared apples to oranges. Seems he doesn't realize it's okay to label people by the way they act, but it's NOT okay to disrespect the dead in such a vile manner, nor the loved ones of the dead, like Malloy did.
  reply report
  89
  livelongerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I never said that.
  
  Why would you say that I wrote that when it's clear I didn't?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Breitbart called Ted Kennedy a steaming pile of sh*t on the day of his funeral....
  
  He deserves no respect nor sympathy. His wife and kids, yes. Him...NO!
  reply report
  61
  mio cidposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  love how the right wing loons are outraged by the comments on the left I guess as the good bullies that they are they don't like it when they get their ass kicked.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No--it's the crime of the century when it happens to them...little do they remember the load of dung they've been heaping for years.
  
  Can't wait til we get to the real race, and call Mrs Romney trash...or compare her to a gorilla.
  
  Then they'll see red. But what about when they said that about Mrs. Obama?
  
  Oh..they were entitled. And they're not racist or mean.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  
  Oh, wait! Wait!!! (Deep Breath)
  
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  And yet his wife and kids are the only ones left behind to hear Malloy's words.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Same as Kennedy's were left behind to hear Breitbarts. AND the 40 years of never letting Chappaquidick go.
  
  "Did you know your grandpa's a murderer?"
  
  pffffffft.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Am I to understand the great LMC doesn't think leaving a woman to drown in a sinking car is murder?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Laura Bush ran her boyfriend down when she was 17. Does anybody throw that in her face?
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. Here's one. Negligent homicide or manslaughter. I believe murder requires intent.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Amen. How evil does somebody have be for it to be okay to revile them after they are dead? How about Adolph Hitler, James Wilkes Booth, Jared Loughner, James Earl Ray, Lee Harvey Oswald, Osama Bin Laden? I don't think dying should immunize anyone from criticism. I'm not suggesting Breitbart was in the same league with the above assassins, but he was not a very nice or very honest guy. Actuallly, he was an assassin, a character assassin.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Right...and he does not deserve the respect he was not willing to give.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  But yet you mention them within the same post. That explains a lot, Deeds.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I was merely pointing out the fallacy in your unqualified statement that it's flat wrong to criticize or demean the dead.
  
  The U.S. has a long history of political invective, smearing and cartooning.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Again, but yet you mention them within the same post. Very telling. Very telling, in deed, Deeds.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  What is it telling? I specifically didn't equate Breitbart with any of the assassins I named. However, it's accurate to say that he was a nasty, dishonest CHARACTER ASSASSIN. I said it before he died and his death didn't change that fact. I agree that Malloy's video was over the top. As Romney said about Limbaugh, "I would have chosen different words." Malloy's words were inappropriate.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "That explains a lot."
  
  Like what?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Think about it, Deeds. Surely a bright man such as yourself can figure it out.
  reply report
  61
  Repairguy47posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Ted Kennedy is a what? That is doing a disservice to piles of stinking shit!
  reply report
2. 60
  Josakposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It must be said though that when Limbaugh made his comments many comenters on hubs rallied around him and supported them where as we have all decried Malloy's, anyone who supports either of their comments needs to have a good hard look at themselves.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Agreed, Josak.
  
  I was not one supporting Limbaugh. It was beneath him to have said it in the first place. He apologized. I know that's not enough for many here on HP but at least he did. It should have never happened to begin with.
  
  Has Malloy done the same? I doubt it, for as a Dem, he'll get a pass.
  reply report
  59
  American Romanceposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  you guys keep saying maloy? wasnt it Bill Maher???
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  AR, what Malloy said can be heard at the link at the top.
  
  Here's what Maher tweeted: "Hate to defend #RushLimbaugh but he apologized, liberals looking bad not accepting. Also hate intimidation by sponsor pullout."
  
  http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/03/ … &or=tn
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yeah, but Maher is a hate-filled liberal, so he must be wrong, right?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As I stated, Jeff, I didn't support what Rush said. It was childish and inappropriate.
  
  As for Maher, no one could be more surprised than I what he tweeted about Rush. I was simply presenting it to make a few Liberals' heads explode that one of their own was calling them down.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  So is Maher merely a hate-filled liberal or is he more complex than a stereotype?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Maher is a lot of things. Complex is NOT one of them.
  reply report
  0
  Sooner28posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Apologizing after advertisers run from your show is not a real apology; and it was his second "apology" that was actually one. If he was sincerely sorry, he would not have taken so long to change his tune.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yeah, it'll kinda be like Liberals apologizing AFTER Obama completely screws up the country. Get ready. We're well on our way to the Obama Crapper.
  reply report
  0
  Sooner28posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  We shall see come November my friend!
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It is my hope and prayer Liberals everywhere are horribly, horribly depressed.
  reply report
  0
  Sooner28posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  On a more objective note, it isn't looking good for the GOP. In hypothetical match ups, Obama is beating all the Republican challengers.
  
  Also, the young, minority, and college educated are all in the bag for Obama. There is a question of who will get the female vote, but with the Republican attacks on abortion and contraception recently, I'm going to be curious which way it swings.
  
  However, the election is a few months away, and in politics that is almost like an eternity, so Romney does have time to repair his image as an inauthentic flip-flopping candidate. The only question is, can he pull it off?
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's because the republican challengers are a Mount Rushmore of fail.
  reply report
  76
  Uninvited Writerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  To me it looks like people like Limbaugh and Santorum will make a lot of people angry enough to show up at the polls in droves.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Especially young women. I keep thinking of this story I saw once on tv....
  
  It was about some country in Eastern Europe...can't remember. But they had this tradition of kidnapping young girls from the villages and making them wives.
  
  And this one girl was shaking, talking about how she had a close call...some men tried to snatch her from a bar, but she escaped. And she was going to college, had plans for her future...and all I could think of was her forced into a marriage, "consumating the wedding night" (rape), cooking, cleaning for him and his family, having kids....the life of a slave basically.
  
  And all her dreams down the tubes.
  
  My daughter's friend had a baby, and though she's happy--she will not be going on to college like my daughter. She is moving in with the fathers parents....taking care of her boy.
  
  And you can say, "well just don't have sex." But why? Why can't we have sex with the comfort of knowing we won't get pregnant until we want to and are ready?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "My daughter's friend had a baby, and though she's happy--she will not be going on to college like my daughter."
  
  Do the words "suffering the consequences of your own actions" mean anything to you?
  
  Just think, for the price of a $2 condom, this girl could be heading off to college with your daughter.
  reply report
3. 0
  Sooner28posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Speaking ill of the dead is wrong? Do we not speak ill of Joseph Stalin and Hitler? Irrational biases are not an argument against an action.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Will I be glad when my ex-wife is gone? Not glad but not unhappy either. Here's the distinction. Our children won't know it.
  
  Malloy spewed his hate for Breitbart and couldn't have cared less about his wife and kids, even saying as much.
  reply report
  0
  Sooner28posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I would venture to say you ex-wife did NOT try to slander an African American named Shirley Sherrod by selectively editing a tape about a white farmer, making her look racist when she wasn't, and costing her a job and temporarily her reputation. I think that was his most despicable action.
  
  He also was alive when this event with Sherrod happened, so he had ample time to attempt to defend his immoral actions. I don't think much is gained in the public debate by going after someone who is dead though, because he will no longer be introducing ideas into the marketplace.
  reply report
4. 69
  bgamallposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Breitbart was a very disturbing individual. He remained so until the day he died. Sorry for his family but that is how he was.
  reply report
5. 71
  The Frog Princeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The problem I see is that the Lame (Main) Stream Media feeds the garbage said by one side and excludes the garbage sometimes fed by the other side. There should be political discourse allowed in this nation. It is healthy. Outright hatred is not. To speak ill of the dead isn't good political discourse.
  
  I'm just sayin...
  
  The Frog
  reply report
6. 59
  Thinking Allowedposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Conservatives are astonishing creatures. You guys CONSTANTLY post things like this like you're daring people to point out your hypocrisy and blatant projection. I don't know what parts arrogance to ignorance causes this, but you seriously need to be cut off regardless. You're attacking someone for hate mongering in order to defend someone who dedicated his life to hate mongering? Seriously? You're like NBA refs that turn a blind eye to a flagrant foul but call a technical foul on the player reacting to that flagrant. You guys are truly unbelievable creatures.
  
  Andrew Breitbart spoke ill of the dead (Ted Kennedy), didn't care if he ruined innocent people's lives (Shirley Sherrod), and sought to destroy organizations (NAACP and ACORN) and didn't care how he did it. Lies were perfectly fine with him:
  
  From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart - "Subsequent criminal investigations by the Brooklyn District Attorney's office and the California Attorney General found the videos were heavily edited in an attempt to make ACORN's responses "appear more sinister", and contributed to the group's demise."
  
  This all never even registered in your brain before you typed what you typed? Seriously?
  
  You revere this man. A man that dedicated his life to spreading hate, anger, and fear. Poisoning the well is not the problem, the person pointing it out is to you. SMDH.
  
  Death doesn't give someone's legacy a pass. How people speak of you when you leave is determined by you. He dedicated his life to spreading hate, anger, and fear and left the world worse off because of that. He'll be spoken of with that in mind. Why should he not be?
  
  http://thinkingallowed.hubpages.com/_hu … -Said-Good .
  reply report
7. 76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  This was a horrible thing to say.
  
  I'm no fan of Breitbart, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al, but this is one of those times when you have to follow the rule that says, "If you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything."
  
  The man just died, for goodness' sakes, have some respect for his grieving family at least.
  
  My favorite moment was when he accused Breitbart of bullying people who can't defend themselves. Okay, smartypants, how does a guy defend himself from beyond the grave?
  
  Again, no fan of Breitbart. But not going to go dancing on his grave, either.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I would spit on his grave if I knew where it was.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  WOW!!! No respect at all.
  reply report
69
IntimatEvolutionposted 11 years ago
Double standard of people in the left??? lol

How about double standards of people period. Right and Left.

One sided arguments like this are incredibly dangerous, hypercritical and out and out lies.

So let's do be truthful here Longhunter...

Double standards are boundless on BOTH sides of the aisle. It's not just a right wing thing, and it certainly isn't just a left wing thing. They are all equal participants in the BS game of politics, just like you and me.

Honesty is the best policy.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I agree, IE. I guess I should have made myself more clear by saying the double-standards of the Leftist mainstream media will see nothing wrong with what Malloy said but are raising $900 worth of hell over what Limbaugh said.
  
  I don't agree with what Rush said either. It was childish and inappropriate but I don't hear anyone screaming for Malloy's head on a silver platter as they're doing now with Limbaugh.
  
  I am interested to see what the liberals on this site say about Malloy after complaining about Limbaugh.
  
  Maybe since I spend so much time in the political forums, I'm beginning to think this site has become nothing more than a wing of the Socialist Party.
  reply report
  69
  IntimatEvolutionposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you for the clarification.
  reply report
  59
  Thinking Allowedposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Conservatives love buzz words and cliches: socialism, communism, marxism, brown shirts, lame stream, yadda, yadda, yadda. Get a new schtick. You love false equivalence too.
  
  Rush defamed a private citizen, calling her a slut and a prostitute.
  
  Malloy spoke of a public figure and did it pretty damned accurately. Breitbart was a liar, the doctored tapes prove this, he did not care if he ruined people innocent people, Shirley Sherrod or organizations with those lies, Shirley Sherrod and ACORN are examples, and he spoke ill of the dead himself, calling Ted Kennedy hours after his death "a pile of human excrement".
  
  Now, can we be completely honest here? No rhetoric, no other bs, just speaking to you not as one citizen to another, you genuinely don't see the difference?
  
  Wasn't Ed Schultz blubbering and apologizing on air for what he said about Laura Ingraham? Wasn't Rick Sanchez fired from CNN? Didn't Ron Schiller leave NPR after his statements about republicans and tea-partiers? Wasn't Juan Williams fired from NPR?
  
  My point of listing those few things is just to show, whether minor or major, regardless of how you feel about the actions taken, whether the person is liberal, conservative, or other, if they're not working for a conservative outfit, there are consequences to things these people said and did. On the conservative side however, you can lie, you can defame and nothing happens other than getting a job on FOX "news".
  
  Give me a list of righties that have lost their jobs or were even made to apologize BEFORE they got hit in their wallets.
  
  Andrew Breitbart presents and edited tape and ACORN goes down. He presents an edited tape of Shirley Sherrod and she gets fired by who? Lefties. It's proven that Breitbart is a liar and do the righties turn their backs on him? He spoke ill of the dead and do you condemn him for it? Of course not, you praise him and put him on a pedestal. When the lefties point this out about him however, "OH MY GOD! The left are filled with such horrible hate filled people!" Spare me.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Breitbart was an extreme partisan who would lie, cheat, steal on behalf of the right wing.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If anyone knows about lying, cheating, and stealing, It would be your president, Barack Hussein Obama.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
"the double-standards of the Leftist mainstream media" -
OK smarty pants. Since the national leftist mainstream media seems to be universally for war with Iran, it would follow that war with Iran is a lefty socialist cause.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Smarty Pants?"
  
  Easy there, Sweet Thing!
  
  If the national leftist mainstream media is universally for war with Iran, they're crazy. We don't need to go in there any more than we should have gone into Iraq.
  
  There's ways to cut off the head of the snake without getting bitten.
  reply report
0
Longhunterposted 11 years ago
Some Liberals in these political forums are just as sick as Malloy. Sad. Very Sad. And VERY telling as well.
reply report
1. 75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Tell me about it...do you think it's cool to call Mrs. Obama trash?
  
  It happened on Ingrahams show. Tammy Bruce said it. Can we get a condemnation?
  
  Can we condemnd Breibart for his words to Kennedy while his family grieved?
  
  Or is the right wing always the victim?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I've never called Michelle Obama trash so perhaps you should direct the question to someone who has. I don't like her but would not call her trash.
  
  To speak ill of the dead when only the family is left to hear is wrong, period, LMC.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I just told you who did!
  I asked for a condemnation of Ingraham and Bruce.
  
  And if it is wrong for a hate-mongering liberal, it is wrong for Breitbart...
  
  Why don't you condemn him too?
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Do you condemn Obama?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No. She speaks of him as an enemy of America..She should be tried for insurrection.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  This is the problem.
  
  You want those on the right condemned, but when the left does it, it's ok because the right does it too.
  
  I'm saying, it shouldn't be that way. We should condemn anyone for behavior that merits it, no matter what side.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Then I suggest you tell the Right to stop doing it.
  Let the change begin with you.
  
  ...because after these past 5 years.....there is a lot of hate to make up for.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  What did I say?
  
  You say I should condemn the right... what did I say?
  
  "It's wrong no matter what side it comes from. NOBODY is justified in this kind of behavior 'because the other side did it 4 years ago!'."
  reply report
  59
  Thinking Allowedposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Condemn Obama for what exactly?
  reply report
2. 59
  MelissaBarrettposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  LMAO! Yep all those invisible liberals that are carrying on the argument you seem to be having completely in your own head...
  
  Sick twisted evil voices... that really aren't here.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I rest my case, Mel.
  reply report
  59
  MelissaBarrettposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'd rest it too if I were you. Lack of sleep seems to have stunted it.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  !!!!!!!!!
  
  OMG, the name is Melissa! Not Mel! Sorry, dude, I mean dudet!!! I think.
  reply report
60
Ron Montgomeryposted 11 years ago
reply report
1. 76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
0
JaxsonRaineposted 11 years ago
It's really simple. It's wrong no matter what side it comes from. NOBODY is justified in this kind of behavior 'because the other side did it 4 years ago!'.

Politics should not be this way... it's ridiculous that the Leaders of Free Men and their constituents are so caught up in personal attacks and finger-pointing.
reply report
1. 75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Let's be like Obama then.
  
  When Romney said he was the most feckless president since Carter, what did Obama say in return?
  
  Good luck in your primary tonight.
  
  We can all take a lesson from Obama.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yeah, just like Obama's lipstick on a pig comment.
  
  No, we really shouldn't be emulating our politicians.
  
  We should be expecting more of them.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  See? It never will end!
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  There's a lot of people I try to emulate. Barack Hussein Obama is no where on the list, LMC.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I know. The disrespect for the president is obvious.
  
  Just don't expect better in return. You will get what you give.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The office I respect. Just not the current inhabitant of it.
  
  ABO 2012!!!!!
  
  Right back at you, LMC.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, that's the point!
  
  We're not supposed to try and justify our politicians poor behavior because some politician on the other side did something similar.
  
  That's the entire point.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That WAS my point!
  
  Obama returned a compliment for an insult...he practiced what you preach..and still it's not good enough!
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  He did it this time, apparently, but not before.
  
  I was saying, I don't want to emulate the example of Obama. I don't want to be nice sometimes and horrible other times.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, let's just be horrible at all times like Romney.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Horrible?
  
  I really think you just let your political ideology speak.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Same to you....it doesn't matter what Obama does...it will never be good enough for you.
  
  And here's a little clue: The one who starts the bad behavior is on the hook to end it.
  A person has the right to respond to an assault.
  Stop the assult,and the response will stop as well.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  There is no 'start' to these things.
  
  Again, you seem to think I'm something I'm not. I'm not happy when someone on the left is disrespectful, and I'm not happy when someone on the right is disrespectful.
  
  I don't like Obama as a president because of political ideology. That doesn't mean I hate him as a person because of his political ideology.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It'll never be enough, LMC. Respect is something earned and Obama has done anything but.
  
  ABO 2012!!!!!
  reply report
76
Uninvited Writerposted 11 years ago
I heard a lot worse after Whitney Houston died.
reply report
1. 80
  Mighty Momposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  And Amy Winehouse. Let's not forget the rousing sympathy of the HP forums for that untimely demise.
  reply report
  62
  logic,commonsenseposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Didn't she bring it on herself with her behavior?
  For the most part we are all the lesser for it when someone passes, but when people refuse to sway from a path of self destruction, even after they have been warned, there is not a whole lot of sympathy for them. Nothing personal, just the way it is.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No more than Breitbart brought those nasty comments on himself.
  
  If it's wrong to speak ill of the dead, it's wrong to speak ill of the dead, whether they're your favorite right-wing pundit or your someone else's favorite pop-star.
  reply report
80
Mighty Momposted 11 years ago
Mike Malloy ain't the only one optimistic about the post-Breitbart world:

As news broke this morning of the tragic death of conservative journalist Andrew Breitbart, liberals celebrated the news on Twitter.

The most influential tweet came from Slate's Matt Yglesias (@mattyglesias), who tweeted: "Conventions around dead people are ridiculous. The world outlook is slightly improved with @AndrewBrietbart dead."

AlmightyBob ‏ @AlmightyBoob : @AndrewBreitbart haha youre dead and in hell being a gay with hitler

Jeff Glasse ‏ @jeffglasse : Andrew Breitbart now enjoying afternoon tea with Hitler #goodriddanceyouhack

@darrenfiorello: Andrew Breitbart died? Is it wrong that I'm happier about that than when they got bin Laden and Saddam?

Kellie Allen @thirtyseven : Breitbart helped destroy the career of someone I know. Good riddance, scumraker.

Scott On Da Rox @ridinchillwaves : RT GOOD RIDDANCE..fascist prick @Gawker: Andrew Breitbart Dead? gawker.com/5889586/

Josh M ‏ @TheSocialest : Good riddance Breitbart. Hopefully they put James O'Keefe in your casket.

John Kapp ‏ @johnkapp : Andrew Breitbart was a racist, sexist, homophobe. Good riddance.

Gabriel ‏ @gabriel0923 : Andrew #Breitbart has died having been finally consumed by his revolting hatred! The world is better off without him!

Dufus ‏ @dufus : Did we cry when Hitler died? No.. #Breitbart see you in hell asshole

Natasha Yar-Routh ‏ @xiomberg : Andrew Breitbart is dead, good riddance to bad trash. He was a vile excuse for a human being

Dave Lartigue ‏ @daveexmachina : Andrew Breitbart has died. Honestly, good riddance. He helped poison the country where I live and we are better off without him.

Lalo Alcaraz ‏ @laloalcaraz RT @Mfusion66: RIP Breitbart? Nah, too good to be true

vtred ‏ @vtred1 : Good riddance to Andrew Breitbart - a McCarthyite nutcase.

Sean Paul Kelley ‏ @seanpaulkelley Andrew Breitbart has died: bigjournalism.com/lsolov/2012/03… If so, good riddance.

CpG ‏ @Crow1138 : I know it's wrong, but good riddance “@cnnbrk: Conservative blogger Andrew #Breitbart has died, attorney says. on.cnn.com/wkDt4g”

TahitiNut ‏ @TahitiNut : Forgive me, God, for I have sinned. I err on the side of being pleased with a death ... of Andrew Breitbart. Good riddance.

michael mayer ‏ @prisonforbush: Breitbart dead? D Good riddance. More republicans should follow his lead.

DAC ‏ @dac2527 : Satan calls Andrew Breitbart home... Good riddance!

Kate Witko ‏ @katewitko : Andrew Breitbart is dead at 43 from "natural causes". hrm yes I suppose wine is pretty natural. good riddance, asshole.

WeirdArchives ‏ @WeirdArchives : Looks like it's official. Andrew Breitbart is dead. Personally I don't like the guy, so good riddance to bad rubbish.

Scott On Da Rox ‏ @ridinchillwaves : RT GOOD RIDDANCE..fascist prick @Gawker: Andrew Breitbart Dead? gawker.com/5889586/

Mike Hightower ‏ @MikeHightower1 Good riddance andrew breitbart.

Nick Huinker ‏ @towndrinker good riddance to bad rubbish. no reason to mourn someone who made it their business to make this world a less pleasant place. #breitbart

Michael David ‏ @renmiked Good riddance Andrew #Breitbart.

@Sttbs73 It is very hard to have sympathy for an evil person like Andrew Breitbart! I am done being NICE.

@CleverTrousers: Andrew Breitbart died! Today looks like it's going to be a GREAT day. #deadgasbags

@crmlqt: Andrew Breitbart is dead....one less racist!!!!!

@jawillie: The saddest thing about Andrew Breitbart's death is that he died such a douchebag.

Inglorious Basterdz ‏ @TheLibertyLamp : Andrew Breitbart destroyed lives based on LIES, I will not be some phony liberal and pretend condolences. ROT IN HELL ANDREW U BASTARD!
reply report
1. 66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As you sow, so shall ye reap. RIP Breitbart.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Breibart spewed his hate for Kennedy and couldn't have cared less about his wife and kids, even saying as much.

And???
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Are you trying to say that since Breitbart spoke ill of the dead, he must be a hate mongering liberal?

Or are you trying to say that when conservatives speak ill of the dead, it's not hate mongering?
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, he was wrong tosay what he did about Kennedy and, since the man is dead, I won't insult him now by calling him a liberal of any kind.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  So, you admit...you use the term liberal as an insult.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Hmmmmm, in some cases, yes, but not all. Sometimes it's just a label, descriptive, shall we say, same as Conservative.
  
  It really depends on who I'm speaking to or about as to weather or not it's an insult.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Calling Kennedy a liberal is a compliment, not an insult.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Not in the context in which it was said.
  reply report
60
Cassie Smithposted 11 years ago
Now would be the time for the Democrats to take Frum's recommendation about turnabout is not fair play. Let's see if the libs will do it.

Nope, I didn't think so.
reply report
1. 75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Noooo, now's the time to call Cons on their hypocricy and ENDLESS victim status.
  reply report
2. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Do you have a link, Cassie? I would like to see more.
  reply report
  60
  Cassie Smithposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/05/opinion/f … index.html
  
  Basically it's a hatchet job about how Limbaugh is more influential than Maher and all the other lib talking pinheads because he's more successful and therefore his comments should be taken more seriously
  
  Then Frum comes to "Point 4: Most fundamentally, why the impulse to counter one outrageous stunt by rummaging through the archives in search of some supposedly offsetting outrageous stunt? Why not respond to an indecent act on its own terms, and then -- if there's another indecency later -- react to that too, and on its own terms?"
  
  Some hubber was responding about how we should take Rush's situation at its own merits and ignore liberal hypocrisy -- it's on that long Fluke's slutty behavior thread.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/05/opini … index.html

courtesy of Uninvited Writer, Fluke is a sl*t thread.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I tend to agree with Bill Maher, something I NEVER thought I would say, when he tweeted:
  
  "Hate to defend #RushLimbaugh but he apologized, liberals looking bad not accepting. Also hate intimidation by sponsor pullout."
  
  Maybe liberals will end up cutting their own throats by protesting as they've done about Limbaugh. Please hold that thought while I grab a chair and a drink.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Really? This is what I got out of it:

"After David Letterman for example made an ugly joke about Sarah Palin's daughter, he delivered an abject seven-minute apology on air. (To which Palin responded by refusing the apology and insinuating that David Letterman was a child molester.)"

He apologized, she said waaaaa, and then insulted him even worse!!

Endless victims.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Limbaugh apologized twice and Fluke has yet to accept, to the best of my knowledge.
  
  For as much as you dislike Limbaugh, do you really expect anyone to take anything Letterman says as serious. He only apologized to keep from loosing sponsors just as Liberals say Limbaugh is doing.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Please post his apology...never mind, I'll find it...somehow, I think the apology is just as insulting as the smear. Knowing Russsshhhhhhas as I do. Something like this: I apologize to the Femi-Nazi....
  
  FLUSH!
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, Lord, here we go. LMC is about to launch into another one of her famous, mind-numbing, anti-Russsshhhhh tirades.
  
  Everybody!!! Get something to drink and be sure to take a piss! We'll meet back here in two minutes!
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Fluke has yet to accept, to the best of my knowledge."
  
  Indeed, she should have said something by now on her nationally syndicated radio show, or perhaps called a press conference from her congressional office, or maybe mentioned it at one of her campaign speeches...oh, wait, I forgot--she's not a public figure, talk show host, or a celebrity of any kind.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Moreover, Limbaugh's "apology" was pretty lame.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  She may not be a public figure but she opened herself up when she decided to testify at the request of Pelosi.
  
  Where are all the screams when people like Maher and Letterman say things about Conservatives and their children. They get a pass. Palin I can understand but her kids?
  
  Seems like more than a little of a double standard but that's the Liberal Way.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Neither Letterman nor Maher spent 9 hrs and 3 days raging against Palin or her kids.
  
  And btw--Palin called Letterman a child molester!! Did she apologize? Noooooooo, she dint.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Where are all the screams when people like Maher and Letterman say things about Conservatives and their children. They get a pass."
  The heck they do! When Letterman made that crack about Palin's daughter, there was a huge outcry, and he (rightly) made a public apology. A proper one: he apologized for making the joke about the girl, full stop. He didn't apologize for the "words he chose" when making the comment.
  
  You're acting like a partisan scoundrel, Longhunter. You jump at the chance to gleefully pretend that all liberals are bad people whenever one liberal acts badly.
  
  I'd be tempted to say "that's the Conservative Way," but I know many conservatives who consistently act like gentlemen.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "She may not be a public figure but she opened herself up when she decided to testify at the request of Pelosi."
  You miss the point completely, the point being how on Earth would you or anybody else know whether she had or had not accepted Rush's apology, her not having 24/7 access to the end of national media that you're meant to talk into?
  
  Nobody heard of her before her testimony before congress, and except for Rush's hateful tirade, nobody would know her name now.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Come on, Jeff. She went on The View then said in an interview afterward she would not accept a call from Limbaugh but she did accept a call from Obama.
  
  That was all over the news.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As a woman, I would not want to talk to Rush Limbaugh after that extended on-air assault. It doesn't matter what he would say to me, I would not accept an apology from such a stupid, hateful person.
  
  A one-time slip can be overlooked; a three-day tirade of ugly misogyny and disgusting sexual insults cannot be forgiven.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Really? I don't watch the View. But I'll take your word, and stand corrected.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Neither do I. I saw something about it on the news, either Yahoo or Drudge Report.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If it was on the news, probably Yahoo. If it was on the "news," probably Drudge.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I look at a lot of different news outlets, Jeff. My locals are liberal as hell especially the rag known as The Tennessean newspaper. It's great for a new puppy or if you have a bird but not much else. Drudge is just another view and sometimes links to CNN, Fox, as well as Huffington.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Sorry--you call women sl*ts for using birth control? That apology is moot. Maher is a man, and has no daughters. His view on the matter is like turds in a toilet bowl.

FLUSH!
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Women that use birth control are far from sluts, LMC. Responsible would be a much better word.
  
  Oh, I see. Maher says: "Hate to defend #RushLimbaugh but he apologized, liberals looking bad not accepting. Also hate intimidation by sponsor pullout." Basically telling liberals they're looking bad.
  
  "He disagreed with us. Throw his butt under the bus!!!"
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nope...liberals can be misogynists too.
  
  Thank God Obama isn't.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, no, he's not a "misogynists," LMC. He's just arrogant and narcissistic.
  
  Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's really more of what Obama is, arrogant and narcissistic.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Not to me and my daughters..He was brave enough to take a stand for us, against those like you.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Ahhhhhh, no, LMC, I don't have a problem with birth control.
  
  I do have a problem with Liberals/Socialists trying to make religious organizations pay for it through insurance for their employees or otherwise when they don't believe in it. If you nor your daughters work for a church or any other kind of religious organization that doesn't believe in birth control, you have no beef with me.
  
  I've always had the impression you were an Atheist, thus not a church employee, but lets not go off on that again.
  
  As for Obama standing FOR something . . . That's a good one, LMC.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
http://www.bnd.com/2012/03/08/v-print/2 … ology.html

allright...now i HAVE to find the audio!
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
http://edition.cnn.com/video/?/video/us … pology.cnn

Ahahaha! KNEW it! He's the poor victim, and his real problem was descending to "their" level, which he never does.
aha....

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=loo … ORM=VIRE1#
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I agree. Limbaugh did descend to the liberals' level in saying what he said - childish, immature, inappropriate.
  
  Wouldn't you agree with that, LMC? God knows, I do.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nope..he's on a level all of his own...federal subsidy to have sex....
  
  Man oh MAN....he would be funny if so many people didn't take him so seriously, and if the R's weren't all so afraid of him.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Oh the absurdity!!!
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, quite the opposite. His remarks about fluke were more or less routine for Rush. The difference in this case is that he wasn't targeting a public figure or politician; he was picking on a private citizen who doesn't have a talk show, syndication column, high political office, or cadre of reporters following her to let her reply in the media.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
"they want to bomb Iran, but they're afraid of Rush"....

RW commentator.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, he's not afraid of Rush. Obama is afraid to piss off one of his Muslim buddies.
  
  Anti-LMC Rant Disclaimer: NO, I DID NOT JUST CALL OBAMA A MUSLIM. I REPEAT . . . I DID NOT JUST CALL OBAMA A MUSLIM.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You don't even understand the man, or what he is trying to do.
  
  I just geuss I'm glad you freed me from ever having to be decent in respect to the R's.
  
  All of you R's here on Hubpages have.
  
  everything is fair game...their religion, their wives, their kids...no matter what they say on the matter: I can smear to my hearts content.
  
  Thank you Lords, for freeing me!
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I understand Obama wants to change this country into his version of a Socialist State, the U.S. Constitution be damned. That's all I need to know to be against him, LMC.
  
  ANYBODY BUT OBAMA 2012!!!
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
You don't even know the issue LH...you just take the oppposite side.

It had NOTHING to do with birth control! That is why the Dem women wanted Fluke to testify...because contraceptives are a health-aide---not just birth control.

Issa thought it was a 1st amendment issue, and refused to let her testify...HE brought religion into it.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If you want birth control, LMC, by all means, go get it. Just don't expect others to pay for it.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Do you say the same to those who need blood pressure medication?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, it's a medication. If you want or need birth control, buy a condom.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You see----right over your head.
  
  58% of contraceptive use is for reasons other than birth control. Or is it 42%?
  Either way, you are discriminating against women because you think they are sl*ts, right?!
  
  Here are the facts, Jack....Russsshhhhhh has made a BIIIG booboo.
  
  Facts on Contraceptive Use in the United States
  
  June 2010
  
  • There are 62 million U.S. women in their childbearing years (15–44).
  
  • Seven in 10 women of reproductive age (43 million women) are sexually active and do not want to become pregnant, but could become pregnant if they and their partners fail to use a contraceptive method.
  
  • The typical U.S. woman wants only two children. To achieve this goal, she must use contraceptives for roughly three decades.
  
  My my my...there are a LOT of sl*ts in America!! Who knew?
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "My my my...there are a LOT of sl*ts in America!! Who knew?"
  
  You're the one calling them sluts, LMC. Are you now a Limbaugh wannabe?
  
  I know some birth control medications help with other things. That would make it a medical reason thus covered. Otherwise, again, buy a condom.
  
  See, Everybody!!! I told you the Anti-Russsshhhhhh rant was coming! I hope you got yourself a drink and took a piss! It was a little late but IT'S HERE!!!
  
  Wait, should I use the words "late" and "birth control" in the same post?
  reply report
  76
  Uninvited Writerposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Check this out if you don't know why women take birth control.
  
  http://hubpages.com/question/158338/why … swer451699
  
  I'm sure many women would rather birth control be left up to men, did you know they are working on a male birth control pill?
  
  On the other hand, a vasectomy works better than a condom or a pill...
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As stated above, UW, I know some birth control medications help with other things. That would make it a medical reason thus covered.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Except that's not how it works. If the drug is covered, it's covered whenever a doctor prescribes it, for whatever reason he prescribes it.
  
  If it's not covered, it's not covered whenever a doctor prescribes it, no matter the reason he prescribes it.
  
  When your doc writes you a prescription, does he note on the form what the medicine is for? No? Didn't think so.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Simple enough. Ask your doc to note the medical reason for the prescription.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Except--and this is the important bit--it. Doesn't. Work. Like that.
  
  Your insurance company doesn't get to make that distinction. They either cover the drug, or they don't cover it. If they withhold it under certain situations and not others, what they're doing is practicing medicine, which is what doctors are meant to do.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  My wife's birth control pills were covered and we only paid $4, the rest covered by insurance. They were only for birth control.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Right, that's what happens when a drug is covered. You pay your co-pay, and insurance pays the rest.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
And the sl*ts vote.
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
On the other hand, I geuss erectile dysfunction is a serious medical condition that we need to pay for because men can't live without sex.
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
FACT: The abortion rate in the U.S. is lower than in countries where abortion is illegal http://thkpr.gs/yuTJOt

So--it's not about abortion at all.....it's what?
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Good! You'll be voting for Rosanne then? Cool!!!
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'll vote for her as Obama's VP right after she sprouts wings and they lift her fat butt off the ground.
  
  If Obama were to walk up to me and want to shake hands, I would simply turn my back and cross my arms.
  reply report
61
Xenonlitposted 11 years ago
Breitbart was a libelous slanderer who destroyed an innocent organization, ruined the career of an innocent and dedicated public servant, and walked away with his finger up his nose.

He was and is the enemy and he was not us. He deserves the disrespect and contempt in death that he did not get when he lived.
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Condom? That's on the guy....point your judgement at him!

And do the words mind your own business mean anything to you?

Birth control should be cheap, available and more of it!

And when people have sex, and it makes others cringe....oh well.

We are human beings. Sex is in our DNA.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "And do the words mind your own business mean anything to you?"
  
  You're the one who brought it up, LMC. That makes it fair game in a forum.
  
  "Birth control should be cheap, available and more of it!"
  
  Liberals shouldn't expect others to pay for them to have sex. The American taxpayers are not their pimps.
  
  "And when people have sex, and it makes others cringe....oh well."
  
  Liberals having sex doesn't make us cringe, LMC. It's like when we see two stupid people together. No one wants them frumping up a whole new generation of little, bitty, stupid people.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Pathetic.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, Liberals are VERY pathetic, LMC.
  
  Perhaps you can all participate in the Liberal Women Sex Strike to show your support for this Fluke woman. Maybe if she can find the time to get herself vertical, she can participate. Maybe your daughter's friends should consider it as well.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Great idea....since men like sex just as much. They'll feel that pain.
  
  It's when they suppress their sexuality that the warping occurs.
  Instead of letting it flow naturally....they get all up-tight.
  
  And, in return, they hate women!
  
  It's sad really....and a shame. I will tell my grandsons to let their sexuality fly!
  
  Just be careful, use precautions and don't hurt anybody.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Great idea....since men like sex just as much. They'll feel that pain."
  
  Counter Protest? Peeing with the Seat Down without Aiming Protest
  
  You never know. Your husband may like the idea. He may want it to be expand.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I have a 6 year old for that.
  
  My Hunny is all for women's equality. He loves HIS mother...*snark* *snark*
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm all for women rights as well, LMC. My mom owned her own business back when people thought she should have been staying home with my brother and I. She was very successful and a great mother at the same time.
  
  What I have a problem with is people that think others should pay their way.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Really? Where's the congressional hearing on Viagra?
  
  This is all about SEX.
  
  Females can't have it...unless they do it a certain Patriarchal way: Missionary, and married, and planning to have children as a result of it.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Ask your daughter's friend about how much better it would be to plan for a child. You remember her, right? The one YOU mentioned wasn't going to college because she got knocked up.
  reply report
2. 75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The eternal victims...always.
  
  But love you John!
  
  http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/hea … g-victim-c
  reply report
59
Druid Dudeposted 11 years ago
Getting back on subject: I've seen more footage of hate mongering coming from the "Moral Majority" which is right wing than I have from the liberal side. The behavior at the funeral services for our war dead is done by "christian groups" Despicable.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As a Christian, I can tell you the Westboro nuts that protest at soldiers funerals are more a crazy cult rather than Christians.
  
  As for Liberals, lets start here:
  
  http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ … sland.html
  
  http://news.lalate.com/2009/06/11/lette … e-youtube/
  
  This is just a start, dude.
  reply report
  59
  Druid Dudeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Funny, those nuts think you're the one that is nuts.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  My guess would be they don't think too highly of you either unless, of course, your a member of their cult. I don't get that impression but I never know.
  reply report
0
alexsaez1983posted 11 years ago
Andrew Breitbart was a scumbag. Conservatives can't even be bothered to see that his "exposees" on ACORN and Shirley Sherrod were just heavily edited videos taken out of context. Just because someone is dead doesn't mean they're immune to criticism, otherwise speaking ill of say, Hitler, should be just as offensive based on those criteria.
reply report
1. 59
  Druid Dudeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I think criticism is the least of the dead's problems. After all, dead is dead, and criticism can be defended, but not if you are dead.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
"Rush complaining media "launched an all-out attack on your host." Says attacks on him are why Obama's poll #s are down"

a
aha
ahaha
ahahaha
ahahahaha
ahahahahaha
ahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Pyramid of Platitudes.

Poor me! Poor me! Poor me!

I dint do nothin!
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Limbaugh just called a meeting of the National Association of Women, the "NAG convention" -- National Association of Gals.

We are 1/2 the population of the country, and mothers to all of it.

Is he TRYING to give cons a bad name?
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Head NAG: Rush is God's Gift to Women
  
  http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/ … t_to_women
  
  Just a little gift to make your day, LMC. I sincerely hope you enjoy it.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Won't bother listening...his voice gives me a rash.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Something told me you wouldn't. God forbid, you listen to anything that remotely deviates from the Liberal talking points or the words of the idiot, Barack Hussein Obama.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I read the transcript. Have you heard of "a blessing in disguise"? The head of NOW is well aware of the ongoing assault on women's issues that has become a top priority of the Republican party ever since they let the crazy right-wing become the voice of the party. Rush's three-day marathon of stupidity, while offensive and hateful, had the unintended side effect of bringing attention to the backward direction of the current GOP. Women who might not otherwise follow politics heard about it and had their eyes opened and are horrified at what they see.
  
  A blessing in disguise. Recent polling has shown women favoring Obama over any Republican by as much as 20 points. Imagine that.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "80% of women don’t report rape or sexual assault, survey claims"
  
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ … laims.html
  
  If they are sl*ts for just having sex....imagine trying to call rape: It would be as my attacker said: "You enjoyed it."
  
  Rush is a cancer on the world.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Rush is a cancer on the world."
  
  So is 'hate', LMC, but your hate is your own private cancer.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  What about yours, Longhunter? Try taking a long look in the mirror.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Nice try, Deeds, but I hate no one.
  
  What about yours, Deeds? You're a Liberal. What do you hate? Hate is a part of being a Liberal. It's just a matter of how much one hates as to how big a Liberal they really are. LMC's own words bare that out.
  
  I'm an American and, as such, have a tendency to speak out against unpatriotic people like Barack Hussein Obama and others have a problem with that. Guess what, Deeds. I don't care.
  
  This is a free country and anyone has a right to disagree with me. Just don't expect me to roll over and take it anymore than I expect you to.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You hate me LH. THAT is obvious in every post of YOURS.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Not 'hate,' LMC. 'Pity' would be the correct word to use.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I am the one receiving you words...it's hate.
  
  And you have a lot of nerve to pity anyone! What makes you so superior?
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "Hate is a part of being a Liberal." Both you and LMC have a tendency to demonize by political affiliation and philosophy. In my opinion, you should both tone it down.
  
  Hate is a part of some liberals, just as it is a part of some conservatives. It is not, however, a characteristic of all liberals or conservatives.
  
  I notice you are eager to go back and forth with LMC, but ignore my response to your link about "NAG," as you call it. Your wife must love your willingness to jump onto the female stereotype promoted by that lovely human being, Rush.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm simply doing two things, PP.
  
  1. Pointing out (Okay, some) Liberals' and LMC's hate for EVERYTHING.
  
  and
  
  2. The fact that I believe Barack Hussein Obama is unpatriotic. He may be an American by birth but not in his heart or beliefs.
  
  If you don't like my two points, I could not care less. Point one is proven by LMC's own words. Point two is proven by Obama's desire to change this country into a Socialist Utopia.
  
  "Hate is a part of some liberals, just as it is a part of some conservatives. It is not, however, a characteristic of all liberals or conservatives.
  
  You're right, PP. Not all Liberals are as hate-filled as LMC, again, as demonstrated by her own words. Good point. I apologize to the Liberals that aren't as hate-filled as LMC, again, as demonstrated by her own words. However, you shouldn't mistake my words as hate when I simply don't like and disagree with the unpatriotic Obama. You may not like my words but I have not said I hated anything or anyone as LMC has REPEATEDLY.
  
  When it comes to what Rush said, I have no problem with women getting all the contraception their little hearts desire, especially Liberal women. I would prefer they didn't reproduce. I just don't think the American people should be forced to pay for it. I also don't believe the president should be trying to force it on religious organizations or churches that don't believe in it either.
  
  As for my wife, she is free to believe what she wants. She has stated she dislikes Obama's attempt to force birth control on anyone. I did mention this little protest Liberal women are putting together of holding out sex for a week. She said we would not be participating.
  
  As for toning it down, I'm just giving as good as I get. For those that can't handle it - OH, WELL!!!!!
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You say we shouldn't construe your words as hate.
  
  If I said to you that you "are not as hate-filled" as someone else, how would you interpret that?
  
  If I said to you that I would prefer you didn't reproduce, how would you interpret that?
  
  If I referred to your "little hearts desire" how would you interpret that?
  
  "I have no problem with women getting all the contraception their little hearts desire, especially Liberal women. I would prefer they didn't reproduce."
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  LMC and I have had several discussions about the word hate. You're welcome to look them up for yourself. I was simply pointing HER words.
  
  I said 'I would prefer they didn't reproduce." meaning Liberal women. I'll stand by that.
  
  I said "I have no problem with women getting all the contraception their little hearts desire . . ." I'll stand by that. I don't have a problem with it to "their little hearts desire". I just don't believe the American people should have to pay for it.
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  There's a lot of this "Conservatives don't care if you use birth control or have abortions as long as you don't expect anyone else to pay for them" going around, but I call shenanigans.
  
  Maybe Longhunter personally doesn't care if people use birth control or have an abortion, but there's no way anyone with over half a brain would believe that conservatives in general are in favor of reproductive freedom: they propose law after law (and often pass them!) to further and further restrict women's access to contraception and to abortion services. Fetal personhood? Abstinence-only sex ed? All of the various (silly) legal ideas from the right relating to human reproduction have had the sole aim to limit reproductive freedom.
  
  So while certain individual conservatives might be for freedom (as long as they don't have to pay for it), the GOP as a whole is against it.
  
  (Also, I have to wonder, would conservatives or the GOP support the right of people who do not think it's such a hot idea to go to war for no good reason to be not required to pay the portion of their taxes that go to support the war effort? No? Then shut the heck up about "as long as I don't have to pay for it.")
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  And then there was this:
  
  "OMG, the name is Melissa! Not Mel! Sorry, dude, I mean dudet!!! I think."
  
  No hatred there, nope, none to be seen, nuh-uh.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You're right, Jeff, no hatred there at all.
  
  I don' t hate Melissa any more you do. I don't know Melissa. I was simply providing a come back after being insulted as we've both done in other cases.
  
  Call it what you like. I know how it was meant and I sincerely hope she does as well. Give and they shall receive in like kind.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Well, then, don't you worry; you can keep on not hating to your little heart's desire. I'm sure you are not as hate-filled as other conservatives. And as long as you don't care who uses contraceptives, then I'm glad, because many people would prefer that conservatives don't reproduce.
  
  report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  See below.
  report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Hey, PP, I just wanted to say thank you. I just read to my beautiful bride your comments concerning her as well as my response. She informed me that not only would we not be participating in "the stupid no sex protest, we will be doing the opposite."
  
  I LOVE MY WIFE!!!!
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Well, good for you, although I didn't say a word about your sex life but hey, if it makes you feel good to share...
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
I don't watch slasher movies either...I try not to fill my head with poisonous hate.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  
  "I try not to fill my head with poisonous hate."
  
  Let me guess. There's enough there already. Overflowing. Right?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  For people like Limbutt? Yes. And then some.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That doesn't surprise me in the least, LMC.
  reply report
0
Longhunterposted 11 years ago
LMC wrote: "I am the one receiving you words...it's hate.

And you have a lot of nerve to pity anyone! What makes you so superior?"

I pity anyone who has the level of hate within them that your own words demonstrate is within you, LMC. Yes, I pity you.

I'm not superior, LMC. I just don't carry the hate around that you do for the whole world to see.

Here's an idea. Count how many times in one day you say you hate something then you figure it out. You're not stupid, LMC, just obviously filled with hate.
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Don't address me anymore, and I'll do the same.

Or I will report.
reply report
1. 0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As I've stated NUMEROUS times, LMC. I'm just pointing out what your own words say.
  
  As for reporting, that's a two way street, LMC.
  
  Good luck and God Bless.
  reply report
66
Ralph Deedsposted 11 years ago
Doonesbury Strip 3-14-12 Which my local paper declined to carry.
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
YES!!

US army drops Limbaugh!!

Hate speech towards women soldiers serving the country no longer allowed.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=tap … ;FORM=LKVR
reply report
1. 76
  rlbert00posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  He's still on the air, Armed Forces Radio too, are you ready to concede?
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
"They then released a list of 50 additional companies who have since requested all advertising be pulled from Limbaugh's show. Listed among those additional 50 just released is the United States Army.

You read that right. The US Army has pulled all advertising spots from Rush Limbaugh's show."

Oh hecks no!

This is JUST starting!
reply report
0
Longhunterposted 11 years ago
PrettyPanther wrote: ". . . you can keep on not hating to your little heart's desire."

Obviously you have me confused with someone else that hates everything.

PrettyPanther wrote: "I'm sure you are not as hate-filled as other conservatives."

Why, thank you, PP, as I've said on here several times, I don't hate anyone or anything. I can assure you, I'm not hate-filled at all. Unlike others on here, of course.

Hate is an all consuming thing that can turn one's heart black toward life and those around that person. I was that way a long time ago but decided the hate and the person I felt it for weren't worth my time. Some on here haven't learned that hard lesson yet.

PrettyPanther wrote: "And as long as you don't care who uses contraceptives, then I'm glad, because many people would prefer that conservatives don't reproduce."

That's great, PP, but, just to let you know, this Christian Conservative has reproduced three time. Perhaps that upsets you and other Liberals. Oh, well.

As for birth control, I don't have a problem with anyone using contraception. If they want to use it, by all means, go for it. Just don't expect me to pay for it.

Since Jeff brought up abortion, I'll repeat what I've said on HP numerous times. No, I don't agree with it. However, I believe it's not my right to tell a woman what to do with the baby unless that baby is mine.

I, personally, would prefer to see the baby put up for adoption as I've seen the benefits of adoption first hand. I also know people who would love to have kids but can't. Again, that's a tough decision that should be left to the parents alone.
reply report
1. 0
  PrettyPantherposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Do you really not get what I did there?
  
  Whoosh!
  
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No, I got it. You were being condescending. I have an ex-wife so I understand condescending.
  
  Obviously you didn't catch the smart ass tone in which part of what I wrote was intended. That's reminds me of someone else on here. Lets see. Who could that be? Oh, well, never mind.
  
  That's okay, PP. I'll be more blatant with it next time.
  
  The rest was to let you know up front I'm not the typical Conservative. I have several views that are left-leaning and one has put me at odds with people in my church.
  
  Longhunter - Conservative. Longhunter - BAD!!!!
  
  It's not that simple about me and I'll admit I was wrong in lumping all Liberals into the same boat as another un-named hubber. We all make mistakes, PP. At least I can admit mine.
  
  Take it for what it's worth but you just might find me agreeing with you on some points. I hope that doesn't scare you.
  reply report
2. 76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "I don't have a problem with anyone using contraception. If they want to use it, by all means, go for it. Just don't expect me to pay for it.
  Since Jeff brought up abortion, I'll repeat what I've said on HP numerous times. No, I don't agree with it. However, I believe it's not my right to tell a woman what to do with the baby unless that baby is mine. "
  
  Glad to hear it.
  
  How do you feel about the trans-vaginal ultrasound requirement they implemented in Texas?
  reply report
  76
  Jeff Berndtposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Y'know what? Never mind--that question was waaaay off topic for this discussion, and I withdraw it.
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  The forum is mine, Jeff, and I answered it below. No need to withdraw it.
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  As you may have noticed, the Detroit Free Press made an egregiously bad editorial decision in declining to run the Doonesbury strip this week that is dealing with the Texas transvaginal sonongram issue.
  
  http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/03/1 … nd-comics/
  reply report
  0
  Longhunterposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If it's used to dissuade an abortion? I don't agree with abortion, Jeff, but if the woman is deliberating having one, she's probably under enough stress already.
  
  For the sake of the woman, I would have to say I don't agree with it. It's not considered a medical procedure at that point but rather a form of intimidation to stop the abortion.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
A true American Patriot. And a true Catholic. He used his religion to engender compassion and faith, not hate-- like so many who will remain nameless.

God bless Kennedy's--who gave a lot, both in public, and away from paparazzi eyes.

https://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/20 … lic-Faith/
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 11 years ago
Serious question:

http://my.firedoglake.com/davidalove/20 … ate-group/
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Hate-Mongering Liberal Speaks Ill of the Dead

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Hate-Mongering Liberal Speaks Ill of the Dead

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies