I have been off the computer a couple of months, but just read some e-mail, was told that Rom. 10:9 was the only requirement of christians,
what about James 2:10if you keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, you are quilty of all.
the word law comes from greek word nomos, which means, { law, rules, principles} we must live by all principles of being a christian. we have requirements of living a christian life, or we are guilty of breaking all
Ia gree that we must do the commandments Jesus gave us. What many fail to realize is that the gospel when first preached was the kingdom gospel preached to the Jews. The Jews had to reject it before it would be preached to the gentiles.
That is off-hand, sort of, without pondering it.
I don't believe this scripture is referring to keeping any Laws. Rather, it's saying that all people are guilty of sin, not just those who murder, steal etc, as is often cited. "I don't kill, steal, rape etc. I am a good person" type of thing.
What James is saying is, even if you tell a small lie (for example) you are guilty of breaking ALL the Law, because the same Lawgiver gave it, along with the "big" sins.
We are clearly taught, that under the New Covenant, we are no longer under the Law, but under grace and mercy. Which is what we should be "dishing out" to others.
I defy ANY Christian to keep any or all Law. They can't. They're not expected to.
Jesus gave us the last Commandment(s) Love God, & love your neighbour as yourself!
Jesus brought no new Law; he was a Jew and he adhered to the teachings of Torah of Moses; it was Paul who gave the concept of new law; unauthorised though.
I agree. Christianity would have been better off without Paul. He was just a self proclaimed apostle who was more guilt ridden and schizophrenic than anything else. But then, he was half Roman so the Roman Church identified with his sentiments perhaps more than with that of apostles that were supposedly actually there at the time Jesus was alive.
So what if he hated woman even though they most often acted as host and priest in traditional Christian community meetings in the home? The Romans were a patriarchal society and didn't believe in that nonsense anyway.
I think they should have kept Thomas instead, and thrown Paul out, but after all, they were building a Roman church, not a Christian one. lol...
No, that is wrong. Christ fulfilled the law of Moses. But Paul revealed that the new Law of Christ was the law of record after his ressurrection. See Heb 7:12 "For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law."
The change of law is to the new Law of Christ, the law of faith to the end.
The Law was of the Old Testament- it was meant to make a point that no matter how hard we tried, we couldn't keep all of the law all the time. That point was made so we would truly understand: Jesus came to redeem us from sins that we can't escape. He is the only way for us to be saved, because we simply can't do it through our power alone. Jesus' sacrifice replaced the Law of Moses.
This is why your religion causes so many wars. We can escape, we can change, we can be better than we have been. Your constant barrage and the majik pill does not work. You do not understand at all.
Please do not destroy my world with this thinking. Please try and be a better person instead of giving up and letting your imaginary friend do all the work. You can be a better person. You can choose not to sin. You can improve - you just have to do some work instead of taking this lazy "some one else dunnit for me." approach. Please at least try and be a better person? Try not to sin and break teh law all the time because you have been saved. At least try and develop some ethics and morals. Please.
Thank you.
Mark, I have to comment as I have watched you go on these boards and make claims. I want to clarify one thing for you as you rightly hate the public wars and killings in the name of Christ.
But Christ said his kingdom was not of this world,
"My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight" John 18:36.
So, what passes for Christian, be it Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, the crusades, the inquisition, the reformation, are all false. They all violate the command of Christ, that his servants will not physically fight for him.
All of so called Christian history is a lie and is opposed to the words which impact only a few.
I know. Once you read the bible and imagine the characters are aspects of your self - it makes complete sense.
All the time you imagine Invisible Super Beings and some one else doing all the work for you - you get what we have seen for the last 2000 years - money and politics.
I gave up trying to get these guys to understand that many years ago, That would mean introspection instead of finger pointing.
That is not entirely true now, is it Mark? You know perfectly well that people see this and you continue to harass them in exactly the same manner. Anyone who believes in anything, other than bottom line atheism appears to offend you, unless there is another point to your posts, in which case you might want to rethink them. They all look the same to the casual observer.
They can spot troll-like behavior as well. Sorry you are so angry - I don't blame you. I would probably spend my time harassing and persecuting innocent atheists if I believed in an Invisible Super Being. Thank you for reminding me why I decided to start using my brain instead. You should try it.
Ok.I don't believe in a Super being. I don't think. Not by your definition of it. But I do apologize. I was in a foul mood this morning and I posted snippily. I deserve to be chastised for it. But, if I am honest, I still say your shtick is fairly consistent throughout. Mine too probably. I need to learn to bend a little. Something I plan to work on.
I just wanted to set the record straight, Mark.
I'm sorry, but that reply bites for me. Seriously. T_T
"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." III John 1:11
There was another verse that my pastor used in a sermon last year that came to mind, but unfortunately its reference escapes me. I was positive it was in Jude, but apparently it isn't.
Jesus dying for my sins isn't a reason to let myself go and do whatever- it's all the reason I need to do everything I can together with the Holy Spirit to walk in the ways of God, instead of the ways of man. Please don't automatically assume someone is a carnal Christian. It hurts, honestly.
Why would what a complete stranger says hurt? You are a carnal Christian. You would not be here spreading the word and claiming to be saved without doing any work if you were not.
If you were walking in the ways of god - you would not need to do this or interact with me.
... WOW. You like totally missed the whole point. That's amazing. Go attend a sermon next Sunday at an Independent Baptist church and PLEASE fix your theology. No, I will not reply even if you reply to this post- apparently you have a reputation, and I have someone looking out for my sanity. Thank the Lord, and praise be to God.
And spreading the Word is the great commission- it's featured at the end of Matthew, Mark, Luke AND John, the four Gospels. ^^
Have a Blessed day~ <3
Bye. Bless you too, you carnal christian you.
You do know what "carnal" means - right?
Sorry to ruin your fun with the independent baptist. But, I don't know if you noticed, she called me lord and god. Amazing. I'm a pantheist for less than 24 hours and, BAM, I'm promoted. Must be the cats. You should change your avatar. Give me a week and I might have a cult following.
Yes, we do understand your level of "common courtesy" which is why we are fed with it as all it ever does is cause conflict and wars.
"all it does is cause wars and conflict".
Do you think if anti-Christians keep spouting that long enough, it will make it true?
Well, you would be wrong about that.
Hey, I was attempting to diffuse a volatile situation..I'm a peacemaker between warring factions and I get maligned. Viciously. A pantheist never gets a break. That's what Einstein always complained about anyway.
Is that what you view yourself as, a pantheist?
I think it fits my view on the nature of God better, yes. I don't believe God is actively involved in our world, other than as spirit, to share enlightenment. I lined up what I know to be true, with what the organized church espouses and there isn't enough agreement to keep me tied to it. I have been touched by the spirit twice before, and neither at a time when I was associated with any church. As I told you previously, the only evil I have ever felt was in a church. So since it is all that I know, I believe it fair to say only this which I know to be true.
I apologize, if this, in any way offends you. I do strongly believe in the bottom line, message of Christ, but I do not agree with the teachings of the church. I find them offensive on too many levels to post. I can imagine no God, of any form, who would be that callous towards creation.
It's not a matter of offending me. I was just wondering. I don't understand what you mean by "that callus", since Jesus actually died for mankind....
And yes of course one can feel the Spirit without being in any church!
But I don't think your views line up with the Bible....am I correct?
And, you're taking that on faith, because of the Church. Remember, the Church controlled what was put into the Bible to begin with.
I have no intention of having a theological discussion. I believe the church has either mangled a poignant message, or they haven't. Either way, I will no longer pretend to agree with the church. I believe God is spirit. I believe Jesus had a message to share with us that was given by this spirit. I know no more than that. I honestly believe that message is all we were intended to gain from this. I believe that all of the fighting, all of the competing dogmas, all of the laws lain upon people within the church has wrung the message completely from any church. Do you honestly believe the nature, or essence, of Jesus was meant to be argued? He gave you a message. If you don't follow that, all the rest is pointless and empty.
All I care about is what I believe to be the message that Jesus shared. I no longer believe it is the only one we can use to gain an understanding of what lies beyond.
So, is Hubpages paying you to referee these forums or something? I don't recall anyone asking you to be a peacemaker?
I was not looking for remuneration. Is that an option? I was trying to be nice to a poor girl that was being eaten alive. Messing with Mark was payment enough. Having you jump on me for it negates a great deal of the entertainment value, but I would do it again, were the opportunity to present itself. Sue me.
Might of make a suggestion? Run away. Unless you like to argue. This guy's tenacious, and the argument never changes.
... You're helping me a lot today. *hugs for good measure*
Keep your chin up. These guys can be murder. They don't seem to have the same understanding of common courtesy as what most of us consider to be the norm, but they're just voicing an opinion. Even if it is somewhat rudely. I think they're going for shock effect, so if you keep your emotions in check they get frustrated and they'll eventually go bother someone else for a while.
I don't know about that. I spent four days on debate with that Beelzedad guy... -_-; I finally told him that even if he replied, I wouldn't. He was being very mean sometimes. TT_TT You're a God-send. Light from above. *hugs again*
What are you rolling your eyes for? She seems like a sweet person, well, maybe not when she's preaching, but we've all been a little pushy with our ideas on whatnot, don't you think? I'm pretty sure you and I have, at the least.
I'm not pushy. That's only your perspective.
I only spread knowledge and experience I've managed to accumulate. You push beliefs. My beliefs are not your concern.
But, if you want to play martyr then I guess you have that right.
I'm not sure how I'm playing the martyr. I'm a realist. And, believe it or not, it is a proven fact that nobody knows everything. I usually find opinions fascinating. Yours.....I'm still working on finding the fascinating angle. You seem too young to be so firmly set. It's interesting, on some levels. Others, not so much.
Do you realize how foolish this statement actually is? It is humanly, mentally and physically possible to know all that is already known. Yet, you fail to understand even this most basic thought.
Not completely unexpected.
How old does one need to be firmly set? And, what would one be firmly set about? Explain if you can.
I'm sure.
You are hilarious. I wonder if you honestly believe the stuff you post. I think you do, which makes it even funnier. I would stay for a few more laughs, but I am in the middle of a book by the Dalai Lama and it is more interesting than this. So, on that note, I will yield the floor.
Hey cags. I'm bored now, so I decided to answer this, since you said I couldn't.
Let's see, you claim it is possible for someone to know everything. My response
To the second point. Just try harder. You can do it.I have faith.
You are firmly set. Or, at the least that, that is what I get from your posts. I find rigidity droll. Sue me.
Your last comment, I'll be honest, I'm on agreement with.
It is possible for one individual to have the mental and physical capability to know all knowledge already available. All knowable knowledge accumulated to the collective of humankind is possible for one individual to learn, know and comprehend.
You are mistaken, in thinking that I am claiming to also know of knowledge yet learned. Do try to get with the program.
I'm sure you have faith.
Cagsil, please name one person that knows everything there is to know about everything and I will concede this point. Please do not name yourself. The claim must be believable.
Talking to you is like talking to a wall. Since you choose to not make the correct distinction in your question, I guess the point is moot.
So, are you willing to make the correct distinction or what?
Know everything? Meaning?
Everything there is to know, which means nothing more has to be learned.
OR
Know everything already known, which means knowing/comprehending all knowable knowledge available.
Pick one? It isn't difficult.
Cagsil, for the love of pete. What is the deal with you? Either or. Anyway you want to define it, within reasonable bounds. No human being has the capacity to retain all of the knowledge already attained by man. To truly know everything is impossible. Sheesh. You are obviously headed somewhere with this, or you wouldn't be arguing. Cut to the punchline already. I need a laugh.
Interesting statement. Haven't heard that said, since I was a kid. My aunt used to say it.
Either one? One isn't achievable and the other is. That's the point.
Really? That goes to show you lack faith in yourself and every other person on the planet. Not to mention, it also proves you lack any understanding of the human brain.
That is why I asked for the distinction between the two, so as to figure out what exactly you knew about the human species. And, now we both know, you're clueless.
I don't need a punchline and I wasn't arguing, as you put it. I wanted you to make the distinction, because one is/was possible for humans and the other is obviously not possible altogether. But, since you're looking for a good laugh, I guess you now have it.
Hey cags. Golly gee whilikers is another personal favorite. I find it helpful to use silly phrases, instead of the few choice words I would be prone to, at times.
Yes the point is, you consider yourself a bit of a wordsmith. I get that. If we attempt to understand intent, as opposed to causing conflict, we might accept the fact that we agree with another once in a while, if that is our goal. To understand where our fellow man is coming from is, to me, becoming more and more important as the world grows.
Cags, what the brain is capable of achieving, and what we have the ability to do with it, are not yet the same.
Oddly, since your goals and mine are different ones, I find you clueless too. I can actually embrace this cheerfully.
And I disagree. You are in serious need of a punchline.
Sorry about the preaching. TT_TT It's totally not intentional.
I know. I realize you love to talk about spiritual things. These guys do confuse one, and make you think it's what they want. They're just setting you up to harass you. The hard core ones are completely blind to the spiritual. I'm still trying to figure out why they do it. I'm not of the same mindset as you, as far as faith is concerned, but I enjoy hearing people joyfully discuss their faith and spirituality. I wish it was left to that only in the religious forum.
I'm not exactly confused, and I'm generally not the type to look for debate where it isn't. I just can't stand it when their twisted view if what I believe is being thrown in my face as MY fault and something *I* do. It isn't, most of the time. TT_TT It's like... please learn what you're talking about before you rail on me, because I just can't let it stay the way it is... and yet they insist that's how it is even when I tell them it isn't. TT_TT Stubbornness is irritating sometimes...
That's the whole thing though. They don't know you. There are certain obvious trip spots within the church teachings that they take advantage of. I honestly think they believe they are doing something good. I have to believe that, simply because I can't imagine anyone being that difficult, just for the fun of it.
Hi kajitaka, Welcome to hubpages. Some of the unbeliever's stated I was preaching at them. I was only discussing my faith and about the love of God.
I'll allow for them to say I was preaching. I was, just a little. But preaching is what some people need to hear, in the good sense of the term. ^^;
I agree with you. I were thinking the same thing. Preaching is what some people need to hear. I don't try to sound preachy intentionally either. God bless you!
Hi WOC. You do accept that this is probably what motivates the other side? A belief that they must preach their message? I realize there will always be opposing views. I simply wonder, if we are not interested in the other view, why we talk at all. If we don't listen, it is preaching, whatever the angle. Spirituality is an internal search. Some simply don't get this point, for whatever reasons. I would hope that one day the blinders come off of all of us and we all find the truth in the light. The answer lies within the reach of all. Not a chosen few, in my opinion.
Actually, what motivates the "other side" is a desire to not be preached at. This is why your religion causes so many wars. You preacher ladies stop with the holier than thou preaching - I do not say a word about your irrational beliefs.
Deal?
Morning. I used to think you were an early riser. I couldn't remember that you were the guy across the water.
In fairness to them, they are on a religious forum. It isn't far fetched to expect to find religious people there.
I don't mind your preaching so much. I think you have an important message, but I think anyone that attempts to shove their opinion down another person's throat in a confrontational manner, is probably going to meet with confrontational resistance.
But, you know me. Oh, that's right, you don't. I think the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
Hey Mark. I want you to know even though I don't think much of your technique, I do admire your tenacity. Whether you enjoy your job or not, you provide a valuable service. People need to talk, and think. Hard stances are dangerous in our society. History shows this. On some levels, you are fighting the good fight.
I really wish I could return the compliment.
Awww, was that an attempt at insult? You can do better than that. Hit F1. That always rankles.
No - it was honesty. Sorry - I know you are not a big fan, but it is true - all you are doing is the same as the other religionists. Pretending not to hold absolute values and then actually doing the opposite.
This is why your religion causes so many wars. I will keep telling you in the hope it gets through, but I am very much beginning to doubt you can break out of that little box you have put your mind in.
The truth hurts I guess.
Ok preacher man. I see the point. Do you? Not yet. The truth does set you free. Even small degrees that you find along the journey. Thanks for the help you've given me so far. Keep preaching. The internet is probably more comfortable for you than the street corner, unless you've got a droid, or something. Then I guess you could do both at the same time. But I would think that would be draining. Which would certainly explain your testiness at times. Go ride your bike. Clear your head.
And back to condescending. True to from at least. Glad to see I am slowly getting through to you - I will keep plugging away - maybe one day you and your ilk will stop spreading your religion and I will not need to ask you to stop causing conflict? Who knows? I'll keep at it. One day - you may even understand that you are the problem. I see you did not take my deal. No one does.
Going for a run today actually.
Mark, in spite of the sarcasm, I do think you're a decent person. I realize it is not within your ability to rise above your hatred and try to see that in another. This has ceased to be a problem for me. As long as you continue to post replies to my comments to others, I will continue to read them and respond. If this forum frets you, then perhaps you could alleviate your stress by simply walking away. I don't believe it does fret you. I think you like the fact that there are people to pick on. Just an opinion. I can't help if it is in my nature to pick back.
Aww. Sorry. I have made you angry again. I understand - I would probably lash out angrily the way you do if I found out there were people who did not believe in my Invisible Super Being. This is why your religion causes so many conflicts.
Is it that you just don't understand or you actually like the conflicts? Because I can help with the former, but the latter is all you.
I see you are cutting and pasting again.
How many times have you used these few sentences?
1,000? Maybe 2,000?
I recon certain keys on your keyboard are warn clean.
Please stop bearing false witness against me. I thought the Invisible Super Daddy burned you for that?
No false witness here.
A slight exaggeration to illustrate a point.
You do like wise, no? (sometimes).
You must be getting angry, being caught out, and all.
No - I don't. So - the Invisible Super Daddy does or does not burn you for it?
See - simple logic tells me that you do not actually believe dj. You know what this makes you?
Burn me? Where do you get this from?
"you know what this makes you? "
What. A nuisance?
I am sure you can work it out dj. Clever bloke like you.
I know what I am.
What I don't know is what you think I am.
I think I have worked it out, but you are wrong.
BTW, I still havent started a war, killed infidels, raped any women or defiled any boys.
Ah, but you did bear false witness - and that is just as bad according to your religion.
Is it not bad even according to anyones standards?
No. I consider raping a woman or molesting children to be worse than lying about some one. I know you think there is no difference becoz of wot god sed.
I find your kindgergarten speech very immature,perhaps by putting someone down is your way of elevating ones self.
Hows it working for ya?
Did you just ask and answer your own question?
But in case I misunderstood, God will judge ALL things, not me and not Mark God the Alpha and Omega of ALL things.
LOLOLO There is no god. Sorry. I see why you are so angry.
Does it make you feel good to say this? Like maybe u no sumfink wot god sed an I int gettin it?
Now you know what I hear when you say this nonsense.
LOLO
Just a mirror. No wonder your religion causes so many wars.
Bearing false witness is bad according to ANYONE.
Including you.
Do I come off as angry? Sorry. That is, in no way, a reflection of how I feel. I always think you're angry. Go figure. Now, I see you are back to the argument against something different from what I believe. Seriously, you need that run. It will clear your head. Help you think of something pertinent to say. You are too smart to use function keys for a crutch.
Don't let him wear you down.
It's all stock standard arguments, used ova & ova & ova & ...well, you get my point.
Hi just_curious, Yes I accept different views.I find many viewpoints quite interesting. When an atheist say, "There is no God, and believers are irrational". I will not accept it. Listening to that is ridiculous. I understand you may disagree, but the truth in the light of God's word is what we all need. Spirituality to me is when a born-again believer allows the holy spirit to lead his or her life.
I know. Their argument falls very short of reasonable, in many many many ways. I know we don't see eye to eye as to interpretation of the meaning, but rest assured we are in agreement that the message of Jesus was meant to be a light for this world.
exorter, this is the dilemma faced. It ties back to the Old Testament which many Churches are trying to go away from! Modern eclectic church, or actual Biblical testament. They water it, change it and adapt it for the majority of folks who tithe to that particular Church. They are sincere in their faith, and well intended, but blinded in mental re-enforcements to follow without questions.
it is a warning that if you act as you are under the "Law" as given by God, you will in the end be judged by the Law. The Implied meaning is we all will fail as we are Human, not Gods. The law turns on us to bite us in the end!
It is more of the catch 22 people fall into as Christians. Rules that human people can not possibly meet,. He made us this way, knows we can not keep those laws as humans, yet He will judge all of us with it? Psychotic at worst, confused meanings at best. And all of it un-proven with word of mouth testimony some 80-500 years after it happened.
Plus there is no clarification of its meaning, except by the Sunday school Teacher or Preacher who is interpreting it their way, with literary license. The way their one particular sect of the belief think it should be. Read one passage, ignore the rest of the chapter, then make up everything God said and intended to be understood, and make it for others to follow, YOU… like they have the inside track to Jesus.
And that’s were the Verbal wars and insults come out of. My way is the ONLY way. Your way is not right!
All self serving B.S. so you do not notice the lack of conviction or upholding the life, when the back door never matches the Front one!
If you really want to feel that guilty, just live with your mother for life..!
I agree there are a lot wrong with the churches today, it is called the great falling away, but that does not mean to not try and speak to other christians about what I feel to be wrong, sometimes we get into great discussions that may open my eyes or another's. most of the time speaking to someone does no good because we as people do not want to see our own shortcommings. but if we are willing to listen, we may be surprised what we may learn
By this form of logic, if you jay-walk across a deserted street, then you are a murdering child rapist committing genocide. Obviously ridiculous.
If you break A law it is that law you're breaking, and you are guilty of that offense and only that offense.
My Opinion.
If you worry about the law, you fall into the same trap the Jews had falllen into. You focus on the message. Try to internalize the example of Christ. That's the bottom line message he preached. Change your heart. If you get too mired down in Paul's philosophy you lose the message of Christ. Just an opinion.
Be awesome if that was what you did instead of just preaching the message.
Why is it do you think that so few actually do it - and instead preach it - as you are doing?
Give me a break, preacher man. Didn't you see the disclaimer? Just an opinion. I'm only here as an observer at this point. I've moved along in my philosophy, so to speak.
It was a serious question. Why do you preach it instead of do it? I genuinely want to know. All the other Christians refuse to answer this question. I thought you might be different. Fat chance.
Off for my therapy session now - I will see what you manage by the time I come back, because - if you loved me - you would have answered this question instead of defending your beliefs - as usual.
Mark, you misunderstand everything. Which, explains your swing to atheism. I doubt anyone will ever have the aura of enlightenment glowing as if a halo. It's a journey. No one can reach the destination. Anyone who claims to have is deluding themselves. I realize you don't get it, but hey, neither does anyone else. Which is why we talk. To listen to other opinions, reflect on them, and if there is a valuable message contained we learn something we can use on our journey. You should try it. Or, just keep preaching. I'll enjoy your posts either way.
And hey, if you run short of funds for those therapy sessions, let me know. I'll contribute, but I might suggest a new therapist. I'm not sure you're making progress with the one you've got. Just an opinion.
Of course - and back to condescending while avoiding the tough questions. Oh well *shrugs* thanks for reinforcing my opinion of religious people. Sorry I cannot crush enough brain cells to believe the nonsense you pretend to believe and never follow. Little wonder your religion causes so many wars.
My therapy is mountain biking in France and I could do with some new tires, so head on over to my Amazon wish list if you want to contribute.
That's actually a very valid question. and I think it has to do with the way that people learn. While attending school the best way to learn something is to practice, and I have found that if you teach the things you havelearned to others, you gain a better understanding of it yourself. I think we can all agree that this is a very effective mode of learning.
But - you do not seem to have learned anything. Actions speak louder than words - all you guys offer is the latter. Guess you are too busy preaching to actually read what your book says about this. Pretty much proved to me it was garbage - thanks.
Hey Mark, you seem like a smart guy, with an overly developed definition of what constitutues a Christian. Could you share? And, be real specific. I think it would be good for everyone, not just people that identify with Christianity. Then everyone on the forum could be on the same page as to what constitutes sin, a godly manner and sundry other concepts it seems you, alone, might have the answers to. I am curious. So please, be as detailed as possible. Thanks.
Too late, preacher man. I've moved on. I really need the advice though, since I do consider the bottom line message of Christ and other enlightened ones important. I think they were all pointing at the same thing. So, since I have accepted the fact that the Bible is simply a group of thoughts trying to share a message, I'm very confused. I need your help. Have some mercy. Tell us all what it is we need to know.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
But, you see, there in lies the problem. I like people to be contrary with their ideas.
What has that got to do with the price of fish? But - at least you are beginning to understand why Christians cause so many conflicts.
No Mark, that is why the world is in conflict. Not just Christians.
No - Christians start a special kind of conflict. What a shame. Don't you think? What value your religion?
Mark, your posts are coming off as being thick headed. It isn't my religion. I realize this. I think, I'm better defined otherwise, although I will always believe that the bottom line message of Christ is important. Yes, Christians do start a special kind of conflict; but to throw all conflict off on them is a ridiculous stand and cannot be argued with any type of integrity. I like the idea that we are all responsible for our part. That makes me as guilty as everyone else, which is the bottom line truth. Maybe not for Gandhi, or someone like him; but you and me? We're in on it.
I never did that. And - once again - you are defending it because other people cause conflict. Round and round we go - back to defending your religion.
Apparently - you do not believe that the "bottom line message" is important - other wise you would follow it. Wouldn't you? So - as you do not - this prompts an interesting selection of questions. I have asked and answered them to my satisfaction. Have you?
I don't know. Are we in agreement as to what the bottom line message is?
If you are saying that the bottom line message is do unto others as you would have them do unto you, we are not in agreement as to the message, and probably not in agreement as to how that works out, in a diverse world with diverse opinions on what you want. But, I would certainly say that I live this concept. I want people to challenge me, if they think there is a need, so therefor that is what I do. Doesn't make them, or me, right or wrong. Simply voicing their opinion.
If we are talking about my belief that we should strive for Love of all things, then I really am trying. Not attaining the fullness of it, but I'm trying. If I ever think I've gotten there that will be nice.
That is certainly part of the bottom line message - you disagree?
You are not challenging me in the sense that you are helping me to learn and grow. You are simply being condescending. If you actually loved me - you would not cause conflicts with me.
The only challenge there is to not react badly to it - but - this is why your religion causes so many wars.
Deleted
Hey Mark. Newsflash. I've learned that I can delete, and edit a post. Just like you can. Cool. Since you edited your post after i had replied to it, I saw the need to edit mine too. But then I accidentally deleted it instead, so now I'm reposting. New concepts. I'm slow to incorporate them into my actions.
I am challenging you because I am doing unto others, as I would have them do unto me. Sheesh.
Love of all things does not mean I have to be all fuzzy and sweet. I can love the argument. I can't challenge you and help you grow unless it is something you want. That's your choice, not mine. If I try to force you to grow, by what I think is right, then I am making a choice for you. Which is wrong.
You are not challenging me. You are being passive aggressive in your attacks and asking questions in order not to learn, but defend your absolute belief whilst laughing at people who do not believe the nonsense you believe and at the same time being dishonest in claiming not to have an absolute belief.
This is what Christians do - to a greater or lesser degree. This is what your religion teaches you to do. This is the message in the Majik book. You know something that I would not understand because I do not have the Majik Juju - faith.
This is why your religion causes so many wars. Not getting it are you?
Beg to disagree. See? That's a challenge. I challenge you all the time.
OK, maybe I am passive aggressive. But as to the rest of this, I believe that applies to you as well.
My absolute belief is very very simple. There is something more that has a consciousness. THis is all I know. I will claim this, until someone can prove otherwise. Unfortunately, this fact has already been proven to me. So sorry.
What religion would that be Mark? Look at my claim and tell me. What am I?
First, let's agree on the religion I am and then we can talk about all the wars my people have caused.
Sorry I upset you. I can see you are getting angry again. I don't blame you. Good fight. No atheist has ever bested you.
Kristians Kausing Konflicts.
Excellent that you no longer believe in god or call yourself a Christian though - at least we have persuade you out of that.
I knew you would see that line about no atheist ever besting me. I also knew it would irritate you. Bonus for me. That guy was being a bit of a twit, I thought.
I have a different definition of the word God than you do, I guess. I think something conscious on that scale deserves some type of name. I'm not sure what it is, but the word God suits me. Is there a better one?
Not to interrupt- but by your own words, you admit to distorting the word "god" in and of itself- considering the definitions any dictionary.
From Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/god
–noun
1.
the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.
2.
the Supreme Being considered with reference to a particular attribute: the God of islam.
3.
( lowercase ) one of several deities, especially a male deity, presiding over some portion of worldly affairs.
4.
( often lowercase ) a supreme being according to some particular conception: the god of mercy.
5.
Christian Science . the Supreme Being, understood as Life, Truth, love, Mind, Soul, Spirit, Principle.
6.
( lowercase ) an image of a deity; an idol.
7.
( lowercase ) any deified person or object.
8.
( often lowercase ) Gods, Theater .
a.
the upper balcony in a theater.
b.
the spectators in this part of the balcony.
If your definition isn't the same as the above definition, then it is YOU who is wrong in changing the definition.
Free Miriam dictionary defines pantheism as:
a doctrine that equates God with the forces and laws of the universe.
I don't know cagsil. You tell me what to call the knowledge that there is a conscisousness that is able to interact with you. Don't say crazy. I know you think that. I'm looking for a definition of my insanity only. Thanks.
I don't have a definition. I leave that to you. Of course you knew it would irritate - that is your intention. This is why your religion causes so many wars.
So we come to the bottom line belief of Mr. Knowles. It isn't organized religion you have a beef with, it is any belief that isn't a mirror image of your own. I would say 'To Arms', but the mouse in my pocket doesn't have any weapons. I don't either. We'll just have to continue to cross our figurative swords.
No - it is not. Sorry you do not understand. I genuinely don't care what you believe. Honestly. What bothers me is your need to fight and argue and defend and push this belief. I would not have to say a word if you kept your beliefs where they belong - in your head.
But - at least you are being honest now. You do not want to learn or understand anything - you just want to cross swords and push your ridiculous belief.
This is why your beliefs cause so many wars.
Oddly, you appear to believe that you, and any that share your belief structure, are the only ones with the right to share your belief. I don't really get that concept, but it's well within your rights to want total control of any situation. I know the fact that you can't attain it causes undue stress. How'd that therapy session go, by the way?
What belief structure is this that I am sharing?
I had a good ride - thank you.
Non belief. Lack of belief is, believe it or not, a belief structure. Simply because only 8% of the world shares it doesn't give you some special minority status. If you espouse your belief that there is no God, then you are doing the same thing you are whining about others doing. Buck up and deal with the fact that anyone that does not share your belief will be curious enough to respond to your posts.
Oh, and since your therapy has to do with recreation, I take it back. I won't contribute to the cause. You'll have to just continue to pay for your own fun, out of your own pocket.
Dear me. So - not believing the moon is made of cheese is a belief structure? Some one tells me the moon is made of cheese and I tell them that is nonsense is espousing my beliefs? How silly. Now ask yourself if you really think this - or are just defending your ridiculous beliefs?
Little wonder your religion causes so many wars. Like what Jesus wanted.
Mark, Mark, Mark. Arggh. OK. For you, simply because I do like you, I'm going to stop calling atheism a belief structure.
Let's change the conversation, maybe I can get my stance on this through from a different angle. We are, say, polar opposites. On the one end of the spectrum is you, 'there is no god'. On the other is me, 'there is something with a consciousness that can interact with us.' (I realize I could have simply said God, but that leaves too much room for confusion)
If you say no, then I have a right to say yes. If I say no, you have the same right. Is this not a fair thing to believe?
Silly. You are the one making the claim in the first place. I would not have said - "don't be silly," if you had not said anything. There is nothing with a consciousness that interacts with us. That is just the rest of existence and you have given it a personality.
This is why your belief causes so many wars.
So, let me get this straight. And I am, truly, trying to see your point. You say that the rest of existence interacting with me is my idea of a miracle? Like, I don't know, the fact that you posted a message to me is a sign from God? I don't get that. I'm pretty sure that's just you. I could be wrong.
And as to you saying 'don't be silly'. You do have that right. Most assuredly. On this side of the Atlantic anyway. I am curious. Does the UK not believe in freedom of speech? I honestly wouldn't have known that before this moment. I'm so sorry for you. You should come on over here, or maybe find a forum on a site that is dedicated to oppressed people. That might alleviate the confusion.
I apologize for not believing what you believe. I know it must make you angry - but your belief that the moon is not made of cheese is a little hard to swallow.
But - I forgive you for being so obtuse. You are just incapable of rational thought. Sorry.
ciao
I did not realize it was a competition. Oh - that is right - you were not wanting to learn anything. This is why your religion causes so many wars.
ciao
I'm so confused. I thought ciao meant bye. Oh. I stand corrected. Your purpose, in my life, is to challenge my beliefs. I realize this. I have learned something about myself, but I only learn something if there is a lesson to be learned. Otherwise, your challenge is simply a need for conflict, on your part. Not mine. This is a simple lesson I would have thought you might have learned by now.
I forgive you for being so angry. I understand why you are - considering your beliefs. Is this the message you are trying to share? LOLOLOLOLO
Little wonder your religion causes so many wars.
ciao
I'm not angry Mark. I do wonder though, why you always post that. It is very odd. Do you have that sentence set up on one of your functions keys? Evey time you post to someone who believes in something more hit F1 for you are angry? F2 you cause war? Maybe F3 for caio. That might explain the spelling problems when you type something different than what you include in every post. I don't know.I'm still trying to figure you out.
No. That's no good. What if I don't like having done to me what you like? So maybe we could make it: Do unto others as they would have you do? No that's no good either. What if I'm a masochist?
The golden rule doesn't work.
The real golden rule is the one the Pagans came up with: Do no harm.
Cleaner, simpler and much harder to follow. I'd add: Do no intentional harm.
That does not mean that pagans have not harmed anyone.
No. But it's a goal. Golden rules are just preferred and mutually beneficial ways of behavior. The reason they don't perfect the world just by existing was explained by Einstein: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
You are just seeing what you want to see. If you don't like something you will never see any good in it.
No - I am seeing what actually exists. You just think you are being loving by waving a gun around, attacking all scientific knowledge and causing constant fights - I simply see this differently to you because I do not consider this to be emulating Jesus. This is because you damaged your ability to think rationally when you started believing in Invisible Super Beings.
This is why your religion causes so many wars.
I don't attack all scientific knowledge. I completely agree with fields such as Math, Physics, Geometry, Geology, most of Anthropology, Biology, Chemistry, Economics, Linguistics, Psychology, Geography, Political Science, Sociology, Computer, Statistics, Systems, Agronomy, Architecture, Engineering, Education, Health, Managment, Military, and Spatial Sciences.
It seems to me that your definition of science is limited to what? Evolution? Yeah, I don't buy that one. And so what if I'm a sports man? Is it morally incorrect for atheists to eat meat?
You are right in your thinking; religion is mostly for guidance in things ethical, moral and spritual; one should respect sciences in temporal issues.
Good grief. You think you completely agree with chemistry, geology and biology? Don't make me laugh. Oh wait
This is why your religion causes so many wars.
Welcome to the forum; enjoy the discussions and be free to add your good input if you may like to do so. It is an opne forum.
My take on that scripture is that we live with sin in our hearts. And if you are a sinner it doesn't matter what law you broke. The key is to ask Jesus Christ into your heart each day and TRY not to repeat your sins.
Jesus was a human being, as he said he was a Son of Man; he did not died on the Cross; he was saved a cursed death on Cross by the Creator-God; he never resurrected as he did not die on the Cross in the first place. He was not a god or son of god so he cannot peep into one's heart. One should ask forgiveness of one's sins from the Creator-God and resolve not to do sins again.
Will you PLEASE get your story straight. You have NO idea what you are talking about.
If you want to tell us about the Koran, please do so. I won't quote it to you, knowing I will look as ignorant about that as you are about the Bible.
You keep quoting the Bible, yet you are clueless about what it says.
THE MESSAGE of Jesus resurrection is central to the New Testament.
That IS the Gospel.
Jesus did not write the Gospel; it was written by the sinful scribes unauthorised by Jesus.The scribes wrote mythical stories and fiction that has got nothing to do with truthful account of Jesus.
This is what is truthful and what I believe; others could believe differently out of their free will; yet they should believe with rational arguments.
Did Jesus write the Gospel?
"Did Jesus write the Gospel?"
Jesus did not write ANYTHING.
Should we throw the Bible away because of this point?
If all the Gospel writers lied, they did a wonderful job at inventing the "lie".
Why do you quote the Bible then, if it's all lies.
Please quote the Koran, and stay with what you know.
You are showing great ignorance quoting the Bible.
I never told anybody to throw the Bible; it is not even as accurate as a book of history as the historians write events under some principles; the sinful gospel writes hid the truth and posed as if they were the eye-witnesses; they never were eye-witnesses. They fled away from the scene of the Cross leaving their master alone to suffer.They were not even believers in Jesus.
One should read Bible with utmost care and warning; only believing what is rational and is not mythical.
Dude - if you paid me the $65,098 you owe me - I would not need to.
As Einstein once said - "The most powerful force in the Universe is compound interest."
thats the same complaint I heard about the exchange rate!!!!!!!
cagsil, the only thing larger than your mind is your head. You`re always good for a laugh. Nothing like a paper philosopher.
I deleted my first post to your post, because I gave you a little bit of time to respond to my first post, which you didn't, which was surprising you didn't have a sarcastic response. However, if you're implication is to claim that my 'ego' is in my way, then you couldn't be more wrong.
You know there is a good explanation for why you laugh? And, that would be because YOU are Over The Hill. Go figure huh?
Are you trying or attempting to insult? I'm not a philosopher and never claim to be one. So, with that said, if you actually have anything meaningful to say, feel free.
Actually Cagsil, you do impress me. I happened to be away for other matters and I certainly apologise for not being able to respond to your post. However, I find you to be a lonely individual,quite intellegent,yet miserable and lonely in your life. Actually, I would like to be your friend and hope to have more correspondance with an individual with your intellect. I ask your forebearance and patience with my triteness.
You appear to be an incredibly insightful poster. I believe you just got a follower.
Thank you Just Curious and may God richly bless you out of His unending abundance. He gives life and love to those that earnestly seek him. I ask your forgiveness for my sometimes sharp and seemingly snappy replys. May God forgive me.
One should read Bible with utmost care and warning; only believing that is rational and is not mythical.
I think you should read the whole passage instead of fixating on one sentence because you would lack context. In this passage, James was essentially saying that you should treat everyone with fairness and if you favor one over another, you're basically breaking the spirit of the law which says Love your neighbor as yourself.
Jesus asked the question 2,000 years ago:
"Who do you say I am"?
It seems he knew us better than we know ourselves ,since that question slices through mans pride and straight to the heart,
In reply to Marks statement along the lines of this scripture
,Text: James 1:22-23
22. But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
23. For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass
Jesus is speaking against hypocrisy.
Yeah - I know.
Sorry u r so angry I int gettin wot god sed. Change your tune - I go away.
Oh - right - U wont to spred wot god sed innit.
Little wonder your beliefs cause so many conflicts.
Christians are good people; they don't know that sinful Paul, sinful Church and sinful scribes did deviate from the truthful path of Jesus and Mary.
When they will realize this thing; they will be reformed.
I assume you would concede the obvious errors in the Quran also? You sound as if you are someone looking to ensure the facts are straight.
Suggets one such error, please, quoting from Quran the first and the foremost source of guidance of Muslims whatever the denomination. While quoting from Quran please remember to provide some verses preceding and some verses following for the context, to understand the correct meaning.
I went to a site started by disgruntled muslims. I assume they have the best take on your text. I found quite a lot, but any discrepancy between the Biblical text and the quran would, I'm sure, be explained away as mistakes in the former. This one stood out, in that creation took a little longer, the second time around.
11:7 And it is He who created the heavens and the earth in six days
41:9- 49:12 Say, "Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days”And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction - for [the information] of those who ask. Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly." And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with lamps and as protection. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing. (8 days total)
I suppose, if I'd been interested, I could have found more. Anyway, I'm not trying to argue; simply trying to point out that there isn't a lot of reason to be disrespectful of the text of one religion, when there are just as many problems with another that you choose to follow.
by johnb0127 14 years ago
CALLING ALL CHRISTIANS ON HUBPAGES! FOR ALL WHO KNOW THAT THEY ARE GOING TO HEAVEN WHEN THEY DIE TO BE WITH THE LORD AND OTHER BELIEVERS FOR ETERNITY!!
by Eric Dierker 9 years ago
OH!! No not your kind. Sorry not your kind. Oops not your kind either. Calling all Christians that think just like me!!That is the kind of Malarkey we are seeing these days. Wild assertions of "then you are not a real Christian". A notion that one or two verses in the Bible determine our...
by Brittany Williams 3 years ago
Atheism only means the lack of a belief in God. Why is it so hard for Christians to realize that we dismiss their religion for the same reasons that they dismiss all other religions? It doesn't make us horrible people, immoral, or mean that we are going to hell. It just means that we think the...
by ALL4JESUS 11 years ago
Any idea of who created that great graphic? I have seen in bumper sticker but know nothing of its origin.
by Cheri Hutson 8 years ago
I'm just wondering... I've only been on HubPages a few short weeks, but I've noticed from the Forums and the Religious section that it seems like the majority of people on here seem to be anti-Christian. I just recently posted an answer in a forum in which I mentioned the love of God. What I wrote...
by Don W 10 years ago
When someone is passionate about a cause, they try to persuade others to join it. Indeed that's often what demonstrates they are passionate about it. So why shouldn't Christians who are passionate about their cause, try to persuade people to join that cause, just like political parties, charities,...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |