10 Questions To Ask A Christian.
If you ever find yourself in the unfortunate postilion of having to spend time next to a christian it's important that you have things to say. Often at times when the christian feels the conversation is drying up they will start quoting passages from the bible in an attempt to indoctrinate you.
So what I have done is compose a list of questions you can put to the christian to keep them on their toes. or if you are already a Christian, Try these questions on your priest, Minister or Pastor.
1. Why does god hate amputees? - There has never been a case of a single amputee growing back an arm or a leg yet god (supposedly) sees fit to regularly cure cancer sufferers and the blind.
2. Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word. Why don't they? And why do they actively disregard the parts of the old testament which they don't agree with or which are socially unacceptable these day, Like child slavery?
3. Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus? why is it the goal of nearly every single christian to become rich? And why do TV evangelists always want your money?
4. Did god create Cancer and aids - Did he? If so why? And why do good Christians also get them? Or was it a mistake? And if it was, Why not do something about it now?
5. Bible Revisions - The bible read by Christians of today differs by many chapters and thousand of paragraphs from the original. Which one is the word of god and why does man edit it?
6. Second Commandment - If the 2Nd Commandment is "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image" why do Christians wear crosses, Have statues and make films with Jesus' graven image on them?
7. Jesus Loves? - If Jesus loves why did he say "I will kill her children. Then all the churches will know that I am the one who searches hearts and minds." in Revelation 2:23. Is Jesus really a child killer?
8. Allegory - The bible states that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years old, that it was created in 7 days, and that Man is made of dirt and Woman a piece of Man. The modern church says this is allegory. Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
9. Witch trials, Inquisitions and crusades - Historians estimate the total number of people executed in the name of Jesus is as high as 15 million (mostly Jews, "witches" and pagans). How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
10. The only real SIN. - In Mark 3:29 it says "but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin". Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers can't?
Source:
http://godbegone.blogspot.com/2007/06/q … tians.html
The Bible as with the Koran are stories written by men during times when there was a more primitive appreciation of the World around us. They express a wonderment of what people would have discovered from a then incredibly sophisticated Egyptian civilisation whose stories went on to became fabricated into symbolisms like Chinese whispers. Those who are indoctrinated are brainwashed and do not see any illogic in its changing interpretations. Did you hear about the minister who had his congregation doing all sorts of silly things like leaving their jobs in the wake of the World ending on 21st May. Well he was nowhere to be seen on the 22nd. I suspect the only World that ended was his...
10 Questions To Ask A Christian.
1. Why does god hate amputees? - There has never been a case of a single amputee growing back an arm or a leg yet god (supposedly) sees fit to regularly cure cancer sufferers and the blind.
Answer to 1.
God doesn't hate anyone... except, of course, Australians. If blatant 'in you face' miracles occurred, then millions more would believe, and that would take the fun out of web forums
2. Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word. Why don't they? And why do they actively disregard the parts of the old testament which they don't agree with or which are socially unacceptable these day, Like child slavery?
Answer to 2
The Old and New Testaments should be interpreted through a consideration of the following...
And Jesus said.. "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets"..... and... A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another
3. Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus? why is it the goal of nearly every single christian to become rich? And why do TV evangelists always want your money?
Answer to #3
TV Evangelists are crooks. It is difficult to be rich and be ready to give it all up if need be.. not impossible though. Just as it is difficult to be a very attractive Greek male, and abstain from sexual relations with hot young office colleagues
4. Did god create Cancer and aids - Did he? If so why? And why do good Christians also get them? Or was it a mistake? And if it was, Why not do something about it now?
Answer #4
Review the Book of Job. (and Aids was created when Barry Gibb made love to a monkey while on tour)
5. Bible Revisions - The bible read by Christians of today differs by many chapters and thousand of paragraphs from the original. Which one is the word of god and why does man edit it?
Answer #5
The original Greek version is the correct version.
6. Second Commandment - If the 2Nd Commandment is "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image" why do Christians wear crosses, Have statues and make films with Jesus' graven image on them?
Answer #6.
Such images are not worshiped as Gods or idols
7. Jesus Loves? - If Jesus loves why did he say "I will kill her children. Then all the churches will know that I am the one who searches hearts and minds." in Revelation 2:23. Is Jesus really a child killer?
Answer #7
Again, only the Australian Children will suffer.
8. Allegory - The bible states that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years old, that it was created in 7 days, and that Man is made of dirt and Woman a piece of Man. The modern church says this is allegory. Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
Answer #8
Which modern Church are you referring to?
9. Witch trials, Inquisitions and crusades - Historians estimate the total number of people executed in the name of Jesus is as high as 15 million (mostly Jews, "witches" and pagans). How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
Answer #9
I don't believe Jesus gave instructions, implied or otherwise, to kill any of these groups. In fact, he said "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
10. The only real SIN. - In Mark 3:29 it says "but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin". Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers
Answer #10
There are plenty of explanations of this particular verse which explain that the "blasphemes against the Holy Spirit" in the context of how it is written does not equate with 'disbelievers'.. except, of course, if they are Australian
You learn new made up things every day. I must have totally missed written parts where Australian is like the Jews. Canadian water will be more important to the USA than oil soon, maybe we will be the next evil doers.
Not even the End of World gags will stop the Canucks from winning the cup...
Hey Earnest, I never got to read your questions. Sorry but I was blown away by your preamble. I think this is because I never considered myself unfortunate to be spending time next to a Christian. Nor have I ever found all Christians try to indoctrinate me with passages from the bible when the conversation dries up. And finally, I never felt the need to keep Christians on their toes when it comes to their personal beliefs.
Maybe I live in a different world. My world seems to be filled with believers, atheists, and agnostics all of whom, like me, are capable of error, misjudgments, and false conclusions. Naturally, I think I’m always right and others who don’t agree just don’t understand or just don’t get it. But, I’m pleased when people show respect for me and for my belief system. That’s why I respect the beliefs of others even when I think they may be wrong. When it comes to logic and the existence of God, I believe four things to be true:
1. No one has ever proved God exists.
2. It is impossible for humans to prove logically or scientifically God does not exist.
3. Therefore, it is possible that God does exit and that humans may never be able to prove it. And,
4. It doesn’t bother me if some people think pigs can fly.
Hi Quillgrapher. I live in much the same way as yourself, and don't impose my view on others that treat me likewise.
The questions asked here are not my questions, I did provide the source though.
I do see much of what is believed by religionists as complete rubbish as you would know, and thought I may catch a few answers that made sense of what looks to me to be nonsense beliefs, and challenge those who would parade myths as fact and reality.
Unfortunately sir, that is not logic, that is actually a logical fallacy and one that is often used here. If one were being logical, they would not rely on using fallacies to support their indoctrinated beliefs.
Of course, you're free to base your life on a logical fallacy, no one will ever take that away from you, only logic can.
Hi Beel. Unfortunately, I miss your point. I did not state logical arguments. I stated four truisms I believe are obvious. Therefore,
1. If you know of someone who proved God exists, please tell us about it.
2. If you know a way to logically prove a negative, I would welcome the information.
3. In the absence of proof, it is not reasonable to accept the possibility (not the probability) something exists?
4. In the absence of proof, it is not also reasonable to accept the possibility (not the probability) humans might never be able to explain all the mysteries in the universe?
None of the statements in my comment were arrived at from indoctrination. Therefore, I wonder why you assumed that they were?
Thanks, Beel. I would be grateful to you for expanding your comment just a little.
And yet, you did use the word logic in your claim:
"When it comes to logic..."
Those are fine as they relate to anything and everything. However, when one invokes that which obviously violates the physical laws of our world, such as gods, one is not proving a negative, they are showing positively how gods cannot possibly exist in our world without violating those laws or invoking magic, and that is where the logic resides.
Those are your logical fallacies. Science deals in possibilities and probabilities in the absence of proof. And if we turn to my previous point about violating the physical laws of our world, the possibilities and probabilities of gods existing are nil. In fact, there are higher possibilities and probabilities unicorns and dragons exist then there are gods, as those do not violate any laws.
And, with statement no.4, you invoke the possibility that "humans might never be able to explain all the mysteries in the universe" yet you completely ignore the fact that even our current knowledge of the universe prohibits the existence of gods.
Usually, one who is religiously indoctrinated would invoke fallacies as logic when it comes to their religious beliefs. These forums of full of such truisms which they believe are obvious.
Thanks, Beel. I really appreciate your taking time to respond.
I am pleased that you and I agree points 1 and 2 are obvious truisms:
1. No one has ever proved God exists.
2. It is impossible for humans to prove logically or scientifically that God does not exist.
To use your own words, “Those are fine as they relate to anything and everything.” Since I made no claim that violates physical laws, your next sentence is a strawman of your own making and, therefore, does not apply to me or to my points 1 and 2. Besides, every scientific law constructed by humans is subject to repeal whenever someone comes up with a better one, so let’s not pretend they are infallible.
You go on to label points 3 and 4 as logical fallacies.
3. In the absence of proof, is it not reasonable to accept the possibility (not the probability) something exists?
4. In the absence of proof, is it not also reasonable to accept the possibility (not the probability) humans might never be able to explain all the mysteries in the universe?
Here, it seems, you ignore my words in both points and rely on a prior argument about violating physical laws that I believe has no bearing. Offering your opinion is not presenting a logical proof my statement is a fallacy. It doesn’t seem logical to declare a statement is false unless you can prove it is false. If you have a logical, verifiable proof, I am anxious to hear it. Again, I believe, in the absence of proof, it is reasonable to accept the possibility something exists, and it is also reasonable to accept the possibility humans may never be able to explain all the mysteries in the universe.
Thanks again, Beel. I admire you ability to have an open mind.
Whoa! I never agreed those were obvious truisms. And besides, you've changed those two points, here are the actually points that I commented:
"1. If you know of someone who proved God exists, please tell us about it.
2. If you know a way to logically prove a negative, I would welcome the information."
True, no one has ever proved gods exist. No one. Ever.
As to the second point, many have shown gods logically and scientifically could not exist.
I can't see how it is a strawman as it follows logically to those who have shown gods cannot exist scientifically, which is positive evidence that has no requirements to prove gods don't exist. Big difference.
That isn't true at all. There is no law that has ever been repealed once shown to work. Your free to show any that have been repealed. Even Newtons laws are still in effect today despite the fact Einstein came up with relativity. In this case, a couple of points Newton assumed were wrong, which Einstein cleared up that made relativity more precise and accurate. We still use Newtons laws to send probes to Saturn.
How can it have no bearing when it IS the proof you refer, our current knowledge that prohibits gods from existing. I did not ignore your words, I referred to them by showing they were fallacies.
As I already explained, our current knowledge of our world prohibits gods from existing as they would violate those laws, just like any other assertion or hypothesis presented that would violate those laws. What other proof do you require?
A believer who makes the claim that gods could possibly exist must first understand those laws before making that claim and then show how it is possible they could exist without violating those laws.
If I claimed I could flap my arms and fly, I would have to show how that can be achieved without violating the laws of gravity, just like if someone claimed we could travel faster than light would have to show how relativity wouldn't be violated.
Hahahahahahahohohohoho....
Now this one broke me up:
"God definitely doesn't hate amputees. I know several people personally who've seen legs and arms grow out. One man actually held a child's feet out and heard cracking and popping as the shorter foot grew out to the same length as the other."
I gotta get up off the floor! whoooeee!
Qwark
grabs a few cases of soda and plenty of popcorn to watch the fireworks
I have a fresh cup of tea and toast. Settling in for the answers.
I was going to answer them, but then I considered the time needed and found that regular chatting with other people was more valuable with regards to my time. Hence, my last post.
Cool!
I know most of your answers anyway Cags!
We have both been around long enough to draw a few conclusions.
I imagine we have a few fundies running through the good book looking for excuses as we speak!
when you get there, ask the big guy. Text me what he says.
Alright Christians, this poster has already called you "religiously impaired" so you will give him a reasonable answer to his inanities and he will just berate you more. All of his questions have been answered.
So, if you have a martyr's complex, go ahead and engage him, but if you want a reasonable discussion, you'll have to go elsewhere.
Lets be seeing the answers then!
Yes the forum thread title was borrowed from the constant "Are you still beating your wife" style of the religiously impaired.
Ah, the old "better to be silent and be thought a fool than open one's mouth and confirm the fact" reasoning! Good advice for the fundies, Bibo!
I just love that "all of the questions have been answered"
I suppose he is speaking only for himself. Some never ask questions because they are afraid of the answers.
I would like to see replies that are honest! That would be a first!
You want honesty from something that is purely based on dishonesty to begin with? Good luck with that.
Looks like you were right, not overloaded with replies from religionists so far!
Your a Baaad man Ernest...and God and Jesus and Moses and Paul and lets see,aaa Oh! That Abrahooo guy are gonna come to your house tonight and give you a Blanket party and spank you with a hair brush till your bottom is all sore and RED!!So there!You wanted reasonable Biblical arguments...this is about as close as your gonna get to reason from today's bible bro.Hope your having a great week end.
You're a bright glow on a dark night cheaptrick!
I got a bit of pleasure out of your post, and that is about as good as it gets here.
in other words, you don't have any decent answers for perfectly reasonable questions
1. Why does god hate amputees? - There has never been a case of a single amputee growing back an arm or a leg yet god (supposedly) sees fit to regularly cure cancer sufferers and the blind.
= = = = = =
This isn't a real question; IS IT ?
-------------------------
2. Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word. Why don't they? And why do they actively disregard the parts of the old testament which they don't agree with or which are socially unacceptable these day, Like child slavery?
= = =
Neither of us think much of the bible was translated 100% correctly. But such as it is .... whatever this verse is supposed to mean; the answer to your question is contained within the verse itself.
" ... one dot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled". "I am not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it"
"Till all be fulfilled" I have come to fulfil it".
======================
3. Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus? why is it the goal of nearly every single christian to become rich? And why do TV evangelists always want your money?
- - - - = =
I can say that I am a ball player or a mountain climber ! And maybe i am ? but am I good at it ?
Many people say that they are Christians! But not all o them are, even acording to their own deinition!
=============================
4. Did god create Cancer and aids - Did he? If so why? And why do good Christians also get them? Or was it a mistake? And if it was, Why not do something about it now?
= - = - = -
I don't think God created Aids! I'd blame it on poor dietary practices and poor heighine.
And then, ater it got out of hand, colateral damage became common from blood transfers etc.
===========================================
5. Bible Revisions - The bible read by Christians of today differs by many chapters and thousand of paragraphs from the original. Which one is the word of god and why does man edit it?
= - = - = - = -
The origional bible (canon) was a product of editing.
Hundreds of different writtings were rejected and only a few were chosen; most of which were authored by a Roman citizen, BECAUSE the Roman population was the target for this marketing campaign.
I am not saying that the product is flawed (Belief in God being the product) just because the campaign is corrupted.
And maybe many people have tried to fix it by continued editing and rewrites. To little avail.
======================================
6. Second Commandment - If the 2Nd Commandment is "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image" why do Christians wear crosses, Have statues and make films with Jesus' graven image on them?
- = - =
i ask that question many times myself.
=======================================
7. Jesus Loves? - If Jesus loves why did he say "I will kill her children. Then all the churches will know that I am the one who searches hearts and minds." in Revelation 2:23. Is Jesus really a child killer?
= - = - = -
That verse is speaking o the "woman" as a false prophetist or false theology and whatever ofspring that is produced will be destroyed.
This is not talking about actually killing actual children.
=================================
8. Allegory - The bible states that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years old, that it was created in 7 days, and that Man is made of dirt and Woman a piece of Man. The modern church says this is allegory. Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
= - = -
The only thing written as being time specific is Adams genology.
Yep, approx 6000 years on Adams Family tree.
But the age of the earth is not specific.
First day and second day could have been and certainly was not consecutive days.
I am not disrespecting your questions. They were good questions.
And I just tried to answer them. Thanks.
9. Witch trials, Inquisitions and crusades - Historians estimate the total number of people executed in the name of Jesus is as high as 15 million (mostly Jews, "witches" and pagans). How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
10. The only real SIN. - In Mark 3:29 it says "but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin". Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers can't?
Thanks Jeremy. You did pretty well I would think. I don't agree with the answers but appreciate your good intentions in answering them as honestly as you can.
....."Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers can't?"
Is that an answer?? Perhaps you could clarify.
The preceding bit about sin and blasphemy leads me to think that what you're saying is o whatever you like, but dont speak ill of the lord, and all will be cool. Yeah, verily, if you just want have a little fun (excuse the pun) at little children's expense, go for it. Just don't exclaim "Omigod" at the wrong moment... is that what you mean?
Sorry, I realised I'm a bit unclear there. my question is for Jeremy, re:
"The only real SIN. - In Mark 3:29 it says "but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin".
No I didn't say that.
There are numerous problems.
One ... No one can properly define what God is. Everyone has their own understanding of what he seems to be judging from their own personal experiences.
Some people may have had NO experiences that they can relate to. In that case, all that they have to go by is the written word. They have to ask; Which book should led them. There are Sooo many to choose from. I think that
When I was a teenager I was told that if I was going to LIE about some insident that I was going to get in trouble over, that I must tell as much of the truth as posible, leaving out chosen details and create just enough doubt concerning the truth of the other guys story. This creates a stalemate where everyone looses.
It seems to me that this is the foundation upon which "Religion" was built upon for the past 1600 years in order to build a political system which says it is GODS representive on earth.
How many political systems are there here on earth that says that they are Gods representive here on earth?
Can they all be correct?
Truth is a precious thing that can not be destroyed. But it can be hidden under a mountain of counterfits.
Now to try to answer your question.
Can paedophile be forgiven and enter into heaven? I would think so!
What does it mean to blaspheme the holy ghost?
I think that it would have to mean something different than what we suppose.
"Can paedophile be forgiven and enter into heaven? I would think so!"
Any lingering doubt I may have had about the twisted morals of (surely, only some) believers disappears with that response from you. Do you have children yourself? NOT in the biblical sense; seriously, can you imagine holding that opinion if a child of yours was abused by a paedophile?
I see what earnestshub meant when he addressed this question to the religiously impaired. I guess he only left out 'morally bereft' to avoid offending the (surely, greater number of) religious people who can balance belief and behaviour... for god's sake.
I have a theory about the paedophiles that seem to haunt all religions.
The way they see it is the way they see all abuse.
It's not abuse or paedophilia when a believer does it.
I have 6 beautiful grandchildren and live with 5 of them.
No blokes in funny black dresses get to go anywhere near them!
Jerami wrote
"Can pedophile be forgiven and enter into heaven? I would think so!"
== -- - =
writeronline wrote
Any lingering doubt I may have had about the twisted morals of (surely, only some) believers disappears with that response from you. Do you have children yourself? NOT in the biblical sense; seriously, can you imagine holding that opinion if a child of yours was abused by a paedophile?
===== ------
Me
If any "Sins" are to be forgiven; who gets to draw the line between those that are forgivable and which are not? Not me for sure.
There are many crimes that I believe the only answer to is for the perpetrator to be expelled from the face of the earth, for the good of mankind. This would be Old Testament justice.
Yes, I believe in the death sentence when applicable, and
pedophilia is one of these instances.
When a weed grows in my garden and starts choking my tomatoes I will eliminate the weed. I will have no ill will against the weed. I will not carefully transplant it (as in putting pedophile in a prison) but exterminate it.
As far as what happens to the pedophile after they are exterminated, is not up to me to say. I do not have the understanding to make that judgment.
Many people, possibly even you, cry that the death sentence is wrong under any circumstance; and then turn around and criticize the possibility of that criminal being allowed entry into an after life; that they do not believe in.
That seems to be double minded in my book.
= --
writeronline wrote
I see what earnestshub meant when he addressed this question to the religiously impaired. I guess he only left out 'morally bereft' to avoid offending the (surely, greater number of) religious people who can balance belief and behaviour... for god's sake
= \ = \ =
I also understand what earnest meant in this subject and many others. I even agree with his statements much of the time though I disagree with his overall conclusions. Earnest, I apologize or talking about you in the third person.
I agree with some of what almost everyone here in the forums are saying, though I can not agree with the overall and final conclusions.
I agree that the bible is "THE Most" misunderstood Book on the planet. There are more interpretations of it than there are pages in it. Who's fault is that?
Ok that is enough rambling
By CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
In the United States: • it is estimated that 3 million children were victims of.... hospital or similar institution, coroner; clergyman; social worker; ..... Approximately 100000 cases of child sexual abuse are confirmed annually
I there is one child molestation by a. Clergyman, there are 9 other not out there hiding. Even criminal look at it as the worst crime man can ever commit and animal do not even have sex with their young
Would you follow a clergyman like this to the gates of heaven?
the monkeys actually engage in sex play ...bonobos. and there is a lot of aggressive hostile guy on guy action among gorillas.
i personally wouldn't follow a pedophile to heaven. but i frankly think a lot of clergymen are running from something, homosexuality is fairly common reason, then also they kind of snap at some point but don't know how else to live. so they live a lie.
clergymen are people.
ceciliabeltran
I did not say homosexual acts, not into that gay sex also, I mention gay sex to earnest he thought I was talking rooting, in which animal eat in Australia
I do support gay marriage and know of a gay priest that marries them. For myself I couldn’t imagine the pain and the crap and than being stuck with pal-o-money payments too.
There are 5000 species of animal that have gay sex act. What animal has sex with their young? I have never heard of a case in my life time.
Religion has made gay sex dirty by making gays sex illegal in 76 countries and the death penalty in some. The Church have turned around and protects these paedophiles and molester clergymen on up to the Pope.
What kind of people, would you say these people are, do you know of a very nice name for them?
how about crazy? pedophilia ofcourse is the externalization of a desire to unite with childhood since they missed it.
but it does exist in the animal world, although not abusive but instructive. An ape would mount his mother and would be tolerated, although no real coupling would take place.
My goal is to inform you that things like groping and all that exists in the animal kingdom.
That said, just because dogs sometimes eat their poop, doesn't mean its natural for us to do it too.
These men are sick and need help. They are forcing sex or having sexual relationship with these kids. Then many of these kids become damage goods or commiting suicide.
Like often the churches turn a blind eye, business as unequally
they don't want to lose their jobs. politicians do it too, after being caught robbing us blind.
people are people. some are weird, some are okay. that said, saying that ALL clergy do that is also wrong.
I did say all clergy do that
I gave USA stats info a few posts above this post
I guess they got away with rape, child molestation and like Adam and Eve incest family within their Bible rights made up from thin air too. I guess that give them the right today too,
Why not ? their murder and war tactics have not change much ethier.
coffee? double expresso? typing while driving?
i don't think i can explain to you what adam and eve means even if I tried. Just say, you're just scratching the surface on that one and sadly, it will remain the same given your lack of interest.
The practice of Taoism is 500 year older than the bible, I get Taoism, it's not so difficult,. I know kungfu, gone through some hardships and rode horses and deeply love nature.
I don't bite like the mosquito or snakes I am interested, try me, but not if your right now too much in the fast lane.
ceciliabel
I am interested in how you can explain much of the rape, child molestation and incest family of Adam and Eve in the Bible . Its more your not interested in telling me.
I'll go with this statement of yours for now
clergymen are running from something, homosexuality is fairly common reason, then also they kind of snap at some point but don't know how else to live. so they live a lie.
Although why are clergymen living a lie, if they gay , again?
I have read that two of every five women were sexually abused in their youth by a family member and/or a friend of their family; … and one out of five boys.
What does that say about family and friends of the family?
You ask ; Would you follow a clergyman like this to the gates of heaven?
I am neither a follower nor a leader, though there are many that precede me and many that come after.
Are you so sure of your beliefs that you would want to be responsible for those that you convince to follow you?
To be honest, I'm not. I am sure that my experiences did happen to me! Am I sure that I have the right perception of those experiences? I only know that these are my perceptions which are subject to change. But I won't change them for the purpose of following any other person.
So I would say in answer to your question, NO, I wouldn't follow such a person. If such a person happens to be a few steps ahead of me on the path that I travel; so be it.
Here is one answer from one of the religiously impaired.
There are others, most are typically misspelled.
"God definitely doesn't hate amputees. I know several people personally who've seen legs and arms grow out. One man actually held a child's feet out and heard cracking and popping as the shorter foot grew out to the same length as the other. God does miracles to prove His love and power."
I chose this one, as my father was an amputee.
How about this one?
Why, according to the Bible, did God have so many people killed ~ including little babies, having given a commandment not to kill / murder?
Note that the suckling babes of the Amalekites were specifically mentioned.
Yes, I don't know why, maybe because of the bonding between mother and suckling child, but I find that particularly insane. Of course killing anyone is insane, but that bit sticks. I am surrounded by young children as I write this.
earnest - most of the question are sound and solid
Jerami like most often you give a good try, just not good enough answers
Religiously impaired best describes those 100s of unanswered religious question I’ve asked
I asked my pastor (my real brother) 50 hard biblical questions and he tried to answer two of them, which he got incorrect and has been horrified and angry with me ever since. There is not one question I have ever refused to answer in my artist profession history; sometimes I gave the odd incorrect answers yet always seek for better answers.
I’ve come to a semi understanding that all people are very social creatures like Wolves. There is no such thing as a lone wolf because he will die without the pack. We create our own circle of relationships like packs and one big difference in my pack is I like to share with all other kinds of packs to love and learn by.
A religious pack truth has become a casualty in this culture war. It is more important to be right than be honest. Integrity has been sold to the highest bidder. All major religious packs call themselves most holy and the only way. Conversation do dry up fast if you are not in enough agreement with their indoctrinate belief and it makes a less friendly world.
My only rule in my pack is be honest and do not harm, you break those simple rules you’re out, only got rid of one person ever, name me one group or pack that can do that?
_______________________________
The Amalekite people descended from Amalek. Scripture tells us of constant struggle between the Hebrew people and the Amalekites. They attacked the Jews as they made their way through the desert from Egypt. Once out of Egypt, they continued to raid the Israelites camps making life even more difficult. Their name literally means "fallen ones" but was incorrectly translate as "Giants" But they were very tall. The Bible tells us that the children of the fallen angels, or Nephilim, were also very tall. The Nephilim were considered evil and there is some speculation that some of there offspring are the Kenites, Caanites, and Amalekites. Amalekite
They were cannibals and murders.
The reason God wanted lo kill them
God gave the Amalekite people multiple warnings and plenty of time to repent. They did not.
So, God commanded Saul in 1 Samuel 15:1-3 to kill all of the Amalekites including men, women, animals, children, and babies. Saul reported to God that he had done so but had lied. He had not fulfilled God's command and the Amalekite line continued. Many people get hung up on these verses especially the part about killing the babies. But you have to remember that if these people were descendants of fallen angels then they therefore were evil, demons, and false prophets. Given to their own devices they would destroy every good thing in the world by misleading people and causing abandonment of their belief in God. Many people want to charge God with war crimes such as genocide because of this information. However, they fail to take into account that God knew that the Amalekite people would continue to raid Israel and would try to kill King David not once, but twice! This is another important point because Yahshua (Jesus) came from the lineage of King David which gives him the right to claim himself "King of Israel." If David had been murdered Yahshua could not have come from this line.
Hello Deborah
Thanks for commenting
Yes, I know that story very well, and I know the excuses given.
But that does not really answer my question ~ because there is no answer. Basically, my question is rhetorical.
According to the Bible, God ordered a whole tribe to be annihilated ~ specifically children and sucking babies.
It is an atrocity.
This, from a God who supposedly created us all and loves us all.
This story is dreadful ~ setting a bad example.
Saul was encouraged to murder babies, in spite of 'thou shalt not commit murder!'
If he was a man, and he did this today, he would be arrested for war crimes.
It cannot be explained away; it is horrific.
Castlepaloma, I can't get past the sort of hate that is directed at people not only from the bible, but the very thought that anyone could justify killing or harming children is abhorrent!
That the object of worship is such a threat is quite crazy isn't it?
Even a reasonable human being makes the gods of religion look like a monster who is not simply psychologically naive, but a complete sociopathic.
The christian gymnastics performed between OT and NT to deny the OT laws is over the top as well.
1. Why does god hate amputees? - There has never been a case of a single amputee growing back an arm or a leg yet god (supposedly) sees fit to regularly cure cancer sufferers and the blind.
Miracles are a poor criteria for judging whether God loves someone. Besides, does an ear count?
2. Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word. Why don't they? And why do they actively disregard the parts of the old testament which they don't agree with or which are socially unacceptable these day, Like child slavery?
Jesus summed up the whole law with two commands. Love God and love your neighbor. Christians don't disagree with these two laws.
3. Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus? why is it the goal of nearly every single christian to become rich? And why do TV evangelists always want your money?
It's difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven because he depends on himself and his wealth. He is proud. In contrast to the rich man, Jesus says that the poor in spirit are to be blessed. In other words, those who recognize their insufficiency are willing to depend on God. They are humble.
It is not the goal of nearly every single Christian to become rich. TV evangelists want your money to buy new cars and bigger homes.
4. Did god create Cancer and aids - Did he? If so why? And why do good Christians also get them? Or was it a mistake? And if it was, Why not do something about it now?
No, God did not create cancer and aids. Disease, suffering, and death are the result of sin. Often you cannot trace one particular sin to any one outcome. And the reason there is sin is because God gave man personhood so we could make our own decisions, and we choose to rebel. The alternative to personhood (free-will, love, beauty, significance, etc.) given to man from God is naturalism. And suffering poses a bigger problem to naturalism than theism because naturalism concludes that the mind evolved by natural selection and truth is just what works. In other words, truth is just an illusion. There is not absolute truth. We trick ourselves into thinking that suffering is bad and that life has meaning.
God did do something about suffering. Jesus suffered and died, and then rose again, proving that God has power over death and giving us hope.
5. Bible Revisions - The bible read by Christians of today differs by many chapters and thousand of paragraphs from the original. Which one is the word of god and why does man edit it?
The Bible we have today is the same as the Bible thousands of years ago (with just a few inconsequential changes). There are more ancient manuscripts of the Bible than any other book, and they are found all over the place. For example, they can look at manuscripts found in Europe and compare them with manuscripts found in Africa, and they are basically the same.
6. Second Commandment - If the 2Nd Commandment is "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image" why do Christians wear crosses, Have statues and make films with Jesus' graven image on them?
There is a difference between an idol and symbol. Christianity has many symbols that communicate ideas and remind of us of past events, but that doesn't make them idols.
7. Jesus Loves? - If Jesus loves why did he say "I will kill her children. Then all the churches will know that I am the one who searches hearts and minds." in Revelation 2:23. Is Jesus really a child killer?
No. He is not a child killer. Revelation is a difficult book to understand because it is full of symbolism. You could use a few online commentaries to figure out what the scholars say about this passage.
8. Allegory - The bible states that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years old, that it was created in 7 days, and that Man is made of dirt and Woman a piece of Man. The modern church says this is allegory. Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
There is disagreement in the church about the creation account so the 'modern church' doesn't hold any one stance. The Bible doesn't say that it is allegory.
My personal opinion is that God made animals according to their kind, but prior to the creation of the sun, stars, and moon, I don't know how time was kept and what constituted a day. The alternative theory of purposeless, naturalistic evolution doesn't seem to fit because of (1) the evidence (irreducible complexity in biology, information in DNA needing an author, and the exactness of the cosmos) and (2) the lack of evidence (50 years of fruit fly experiments and still just fruit flies, 50 years of amino acid experiments and no DNA, the gaps in the fossil record) and (3) the only evidence that we all remember from biology class in support of macro-evolution is mostly fraudulent (dead peppered moths glued to trees, misleading embryo diagrams) and (4) some of the biggest backers of evolution admit that evidence isn't necessary to them to accept it as fact. Consider Richard Dawkins who wrote, "Even if there were no actual evidence in favor of the Darwinian Theory...we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories." So, that is why I don't think naturalistic evolution is a satisfactory explanation for the origin of life.
9. Witch trials, Inquisitions and crusades - Historians estimate the total number of people executed in the name of Jesus is as high as 15 million (mostly Jews, "witches" and pagans). How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
First of all, your math is off. Hitler is responsible for killing around 11 million (and that's if we don't blame him for WWII) so 15/11 is approximately 1.5.
Second, Jesus came to serve and told his followers to do the same. If someone uses Jesus's name and religion to do something that is not in line with what Jesus taught, that isn't Christianity and it doesn't make Jesus the culprit.
10. The only real SIN. - In Mark 3:29 it says "but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin". Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers can't?
Yes. It is difficult to accept that God's love is so great as to forgive someone the most heinous crimes and even begin to change them, but the good news is that it is open to anyone who will repent and ask for forgiveness. A more difficult question though is, if naturalistic evolution is true, how can we even say authoritatively that pedophile, child killing, rape, and genocide are wrong? Naturalism leads us with nothing other than 'might makes right.'
____________________________
_____________________________
#2. There are not two laws. He did not say the laws were summed up. He said all the laws hang on these two..meaning the other laws can be achieved if you love God and others. A person who truly loves would not do wrong to others.
Matt 22
40.On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
#5 Today's bible is so different from the Hebrew bible (which it was taken from) many words are translated wrong and some are left out. Today's bible does not convey the true meaning.
#6. And yet the Christians say the Jewish Star of David is of the devil.
#8. Evolution fraudulent? You're kidding. We see evolution in everything,. even plants.
I have to say, I have never read such an inaccurate unsubstantiated pile of misinformation before in my life!
Where do you get this stuff? Was it bible class?
Which part would you like to have substantiated?
Start at the start. Your answer about amputees. Will an ear do?
Did your ear grow back?
Or are you referring to the science that grew an ear on a rodent?
If you want to do this point by point I will be happy to oblige.
Unfortunately I will not accept "It's god's word" or goddunnit, as that would involve the old circular logic of "The bible said it, and that's the word of god" as arguments.
I am referring to the recording of Jesus' arrest when Peter cut off the ear of the Chief Priest's servant's ear, and then Jesus promptly healed his ear. But the main point was that the performance of miracles was a poor criteria to judge God's love for someone.
OK, now I'm with you!
I would have thought it would be valid in the light of claims made.
By the way, this is not a list I compiled.
I will not argue strongly on this, you have a valid point. I think there are more important criteria.
jcnasia
Miracles are a poor criteria for judging whether God loves someone. Besides, does an ear count?
You stated that an ear count is when Jesus demanded to cut off an ear and then he healed that ear, most anyone can heal an ear from a fresh clean cut of an ear because no bones or other complex body part involved
Christian has been the world champions of murder in a uniform ever since the Roman’s. Hitler thought was doing Christ work by stamping out Jews, atheist and etc. I wonder if the terminator (like the fiction movie ) went back in time and killed a whole pile of people in order to save Jesus, do you think Jesus could heal that whole pile of bodies.
More people have die in the name of God then for any other reason. For what reason is there to kill anyone.
Is it not the absences of reason is pure evil?
The problem with your second question is that it assumes that all the laws in the Bible are to be universally applied, but in reality the Bible needs to be understood in its historical context. Some are just to be used in that particular context--namely within the historical nation of Israel. If we want to know which laws we still need to follow today, we sort it through the grid that Jesus gave us--loving God and loving our neighbor.
The problem is, that despite constant "adjustments" in the bible text, the magnitude of which you have not acknowledged, and the thousands of differing opinions as to the meaning of what remains is the common theme amongst believers.
I can go to the Hebrew or Greek if you like, but the problems remain. It is a lot of hearsay to begin with, it is fragmented, and what remains is only a portion of the information from that time and times before, where the biblical god stories were lifted from by a few goat herders.
Religion is a psychological condition that has no easy cure. I beat religion and cancer, it's been a great life.
I'm not sure what your response has to do with what I wrote about the second question.
That's OK, I thought I would save you some time is all.
Could you repeat the part of what I said you disagree with, and could you do it without quoting scripture?
Your second question from the list of 10 assumes that every aspect of the law is universally applicable. That's the part I disagree with. The Old Testament law can be divided into cleanliness laws and moral laws. The cleanliness laws don't apply anymore. They were given to the nation of Israel to help them understand that they must be respectful and intentional in their approach to God.
The passage you refer to, Matthew 5:17-18, is found within the Sermon on the Mount, and in this sermon, Jesus only preaches about the moral law. That is why I summarized the moral law as loving God and loving your neighbor.
The problem here is the disconnect between OT and NT. I wrote a hub called "The biblical god is a psychopath" which explains a bit of it.
The bible is divided and sliced by it's proponents in to what is myth, what is not..... using selective reasoning.
This is done by all who have approached this in any of the major religions.
Most of the christian religions hate each others guts by the way, with catholics being separated as "not christian" by some, baptists by another group etc.
It's also worth noting the atrocities in the quoran that christians love to scream about could be seen as out of context as readily as the biblical threats and neurosis.
I don't see a disconnect between the OT and the NT, and I haven't used selective reasoning to divide the Bible into what is myth and what is not. Typically, when I study the Bible, I try to figure out what was the author's original meaning to the original audience (which isn't me), then draw timeless principles from this meaning, and lastly apply these principles. I also consider what type of literature a book of the Bible is. For example, I'll interpret a book full of prophetic imagery like Revelation much differently than a historic account like Acts. Maybe this method could be called selective reasoning, but it seems to be a common sense approach to the studying the Bible.
The Bible to me is a seamlessly woven masterpiece, written by over 40 different authors from high and low positions and spanning 1,600 years. It begins with creation (how things used to be and how they ought to be), and then the fall (how things are now). The OT is consistently hammering home the fall and its effects while at the same time providing prophecies and real life pictures of redemption. Think about Noah's Ark, the ram that was sacrificed by Abraham in place of his son, the Passover Lamb that was sacrificed the night before the Hebrews left Egypt, the bronze snake that healed the Hebrews while in the wilderness (that has now become a symbol for medicine). Stories like these are throughout the OT, and they are all pointing to a future Savior. In the OT, it is like God is wooing the Hebrews back to himself, but they continually prostitute themselves with false gods, so finally God comes in the NT and gives up his life for the people. He wins them back, and not just the 'Chosen' Jews but all mankind. After all, he originally chose Abraham for the purpose of blessing the nations through Abraham, not just to bless Abraham.
Misinformation. The symbol of medicine is the rod of Aesculapius, Which was taken because the father of medicine, Hippocrates used it as he worshiped Asclepius.
The bibile is not a masterpiece, may be violent but not a masterpiece, but yo are right in saying that is a collection of books written by various authors over centuries. Even single books were authored by many, and edited and re-edited by so many.
If you really want to see a masterpiece of that size, see the Indian book The Mahabharata.
The so called prophecies were written long after it has taken place, so no price in guessing.
Noah's ark? Try the epic of Gilgamesh by the Babylonians long before OT is written. And my uneducated neighborer can come up with more creative ideas, than the drowning thing brought by all powerful god. (I wonder, why kill animals?)
The great plan of god, to give permission to himself, for not sending humans to the hell, he created for them, by coming as his own son and killing himself, just to get resurrected after three days-hilarious. I agree, all powerful or not, none can top him in foolishness
Now purpose of life. What purpose you got, going to heaven, hardly worthwhile pursuing.
Morality is defined by societies. It changes and are continuously evolving. Just compare your OT morality with NT. If you were born in a cannibalistic society, what morality would you be preaching?
Truth,Right Wrong good bad and all are human concepts developed over time to maintain a society and has biological basis for humans as a species.
I think you might be right about the symbol of medicine, but that's not central to the discussion.
I used the bronze snake, Noah's ark, the Passover lamb, etc. to point out the common theme that runs throughout the Bible. Men have fallen, deserve death, but instead, God rescues them whether it is through a bronze snake, an ark, an animal, or something else. I think these stories are not just real, but also pictures of the coming Savior. Jesus became our bronze snake lifted up (John 3:15), our ark (1 Peter 3:20-21), and our Passover Lamb (John 1:29). This is a masterpiece. How could these redemptive themes be woven so seamlessly through a book written by many authors over so many centuries?
The prophecies were not written long after the events took place. In fact, the entire Old Testament translation from Hebrew to Greek to form the Septuagint was finished by 132 BC (according to Wikipedia). So any prophecies about the Messiah had to have been written before the time of Jesus.
My purpose in life: to do what I was created for--to live in community with God and with my fellow man, to take care of creation, and to use my talents, abilities, and creativity to both restore and create culture.
If truth, right, wrong, good, and bad are just human concepts, then they are just figments our imaginations. A naturalist who knows they are just illusions takes an irrational leap of faith when he decides to live as if they are reality.
"The prophecies were not written long after the events took place. In fact, the entire Old Testament translation from Hebrew to Greek to form the Septuagint was finished by 132 BC (according to Wikipedia). So any prophecies about the Messiah had to have been written before the time of Jesus."
Just to illustrate I take only two prophecies that are fulfilled.
He will be called Immanuel- When was he ever called Immanuel?
What about Nazareth, which was a misquote of the word Nazarene?
"My purpose in life: to do what I was created for--to live in community with God and with my fellow man, to take care of creation, and to use my talents, abilities, and creativity to both restore and create culture."
I'm doing it without any god, or gods help. I help others, I live in society harmoniously.... What is the difference?
"If truth, right, wrong, good, and bad are just human concepts, then they are just figments our imaginations. A naturalist who knows they are just illusions takes an irrational leap of faith when he decides to live as if they are reality."
We love in a society with some sense of right and wrong. A good number of it are innate. Do you know that with out any religion lioness help there injured?
A naturalist is one who try to explain nature rationally, why thing work the way they work. It means they do not use magic for there explanation.
Is it wrong to kill a human or what to do with a killer?
Your first answer might be no(Initial answer to 2nd Q may vary depending on your culture and society), but if I point out to you different situations your answer change. Like I already told, if you are brought up in a cannibalistic society, or the ancient OT society , your question will be which human!
Surely social inter action was an integral part of Evolution ?
Evolving is about trial and error and learning. As an animal species Man was a pretty pathetic example, it's a wonder we made it at all.
From that I would hypothesise that social cooperation including the sharing of knowledge was one of the first primitive steps but by watching and learning from other species was also high on the education trail to learn skills. Watching pack interaction must have helped to learn bonding skills.
It doesn't take a degree in rocket science to work out what is nice and what is nasty and which one you like no matter what stage you're at in the evolutionalary ladder. It only gets classed as morality when you work out a word for the behaviour, but behaviour evolve just like everything else.
Jomine and Merlin,
Evolution at a behavioral level takes on pragmatism. If it works and rewards the participants, then they keep doing the behavior and pass it on to their descendants. This seems like a good answer to explain morality, but it has a flaw. It doesn't explain morality; it explains the current behavior, whatever that might be.
A book published in 2000 titled "The Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases for Sexual Coercion" argued that rape is not a pathology, biologically speaking, but evolution finding ways to maximize reproduction. The author Thornhill went on to claim on NPR, "every feature of every living thing, including human beings, has an underlying evolutionary background. That's not a debatable matter." To me, this is an outrageous claim about rape, but if you accept evolutionary naturalism, there is no logical way to oppose the author's conclusion. Evolution and evolutionary ethics are a packaged deal.
Someone else might claim that not-raping is much more common, but don't worry, evolution will also account for that. Evolution psychology is so elastic that it can explain any phenomenon and its opposite. Thus, in reality, it doesn't explain anything. Evolution can't explain morality.
Seamlessly woven with at least 3 scriptures known but not included? Seamless after being shredded by the church of Rome?
If you were born in Bangladesh you would be quoting the other book just as all religions reflect culture.
Surely you jest!
I'm going to put my two cents worth in. Because this is a good thread, and your debate with jcnasia is interesting. He/she seems pretty reasonable and so do you. From opposing sides.
I don't think your question number ten focuses on the most important aspect; that could stop most of the arguments, if people would give each other credit for their thoughts. I've heard it before and that's why I believe Jesus was pretty smart.
It says ' Say what you will about me or god, but don't talk bad about the Spirit'. That sounds to me like he knows everybody will disagree about the concept of God and we'll never see eye to eye about who he was. And he's saying there's nothing wrong with that and it is to be expected; but don't lose sight that the spirit exists. It's the only real thing in the conversation.
I think he was trying to point out that religion is off base, but there was a core reason it would always exist. They were aware of something quite simple, but could always be counted on to go around their elbow to focus on their a** in the process of explaining it.
___________________
That scripture simply means don't attribute something of God's power to the devil.
They had accused Yahshua (Jesus) of using the power of Satan to cast out Satan.
this statement sums it up
Mark 3
30. Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
Today the Christians accuse other religions of using the power of Satan, when in reality they are seeking and are of God. I wonder how many have blasphemed, and think they are of God.
I'm not a theologian or a Bible scholar, so I wouldn't argue the point. I will say that from what I've seen many verses have multiple levels of meaning, which is why even the scholars disagree. But we are in agreement that those who 'blaspheme' the spirit are, many times, the religious themselves.
If I sat down with a evolutionary naturalist, I would ask the following questions:
Since naturalism can be logically extended to say that the mind evolved by natural selection and so truth is just what works (pragmatism), how can life have any meaning or purpose? Is an evolutionary naturalist being irrational to claim that life is the result of purposeless chance and then to live like life matters?
How do you determine morality? How can you authoritatively claim anything is right or wrong, good or bad?
If you cannot see morality without religion and understand that, I have nothing to add.
I'm not saying that evolutionary naturalists are immoral. Instead, I'm arguing that this belief provides no basis for morality. Morality to an evolutionary naturalist is an irrational leap of faith that goes against evolutionary theory.
You wrote:
"Morality to an evolutionary naturalist is an irrational leap of faith that goes against evolutionary theory."
No, this is an irrational leap of faith.
http://www.break.com/usercontent/2008/7 … oor-532172
It' has always been easy to establish morals starting with the idea of ownership which dates back to caveman days.
If you stole his food, your neighbour would teach you some morals really quickly.
In these days, some of us have become a little more sophisticated and recognise that doing good things for people and being helpful is very pro survival for body and mind.
Some have gone even further and recognise that giving love helps ourselves to understand love, receive it and live a great life with others because of it. We are all dependant on each other in the modern world, so it makes sense not to abuse relationships with others, or act without morals toward them.
First came the understanding, then the laws to enforce them, not the other way around.
" How do you determine morality? How can you authoritatively claim anything is right or wrong, good or bad? "
First Do No Harm. If you deliberately set out to do harm then I would say with a degree of authority that morally that would be wrong and I'm fairly certain if you claim any different then you seriously need some guidance.
Please let me know how you determine this rule 'do no harm.' Do you accept it by faith even though natural selection would suppose 'the survival of the fittest' or 'might makes right'?
First of all I think you need to define a timeline of some sort to determin at what point you wish to look at to decide where in evolution man discovered or invented a moral code of conduct.
Early on in man's evolution The Law of the Jungle ruled, and yes it was the survival of the fittest. You would survive if you could run faster than the last person to see the danger creeping up on you.
You seem to be avoiding the point that mankind is just another animal species on the planet and some how pure basic instict of survival doesn't apply to us.
What is they say, you don't stop running when you get tired you stop when the lion gets tired...
Wolves are highly social animals in their pack, but they do have a pecking order and rules, and transgressors will be dealt with. Just as they will kill other wollves from other packs who try to invade their terriory. Does that demonstrate a moral code or just years of wolf evolution ?
All animals have an ablity to think and reason, most don't use it because they have little need of it to live but man developed his powers of reason and therfore you could say started down a different evolutionary path.
Either way you are talking about millions of years and little steps. You are leaping around all over the place looking for an abstract which may not be there.
YES! so God is a Frog! YOU are my true messiah,
I know because I have followed a few
What God ?
I'm sure somewhere in the world there are those who hold the frog in high esteem, why not, over the centuries every other animal has held the position at one time or another. Makes as such sense as a non existant one.
To me it made more sense to worship the Sun, at least it actually does something and you can see it at work.
Anyway thanks for the promotion but I hope you don't mind if I decline, my duties as Guru keep me very busy and I don't think I'd like all the adoration.
So exactly what point were you trying to make ?
That God Dun It in 6 days ? Is that it ?
Your totally right!!! You are the Sun of God!!!
I'm just messing with you Merlin
Great article! Very insightful, but I fear, as with most religious, there will be no true thought put into it, they will just spit what they've heard from others. That is (ironically) the same way they became religious in the first place!
"If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people." -Dr. House
I am not a Christian. I am a Hindu. But I believe Bible contains spiritual wisdom for those who seek it "earnest"ly (not "earnesthub"ly!)
Personally, I found many of these questions shallow, intent on teasing rather than willing to understand.
Since I could not answer them briefly, I have made a Hub: <link snipped, no self-promotion in forums>
Those who are interested to know my answers to the queries in support of bible, with a fair doze of comparative wisdom from Hinduism, are welcome to read it.
I look at some of it, read the rest later
It's pretty much Earnesthub questions, why would you go through the trouble of writting a hub on his questions. When you think these questions were shallow and more of a joke than an understanding?
If I thought that it was weak, I would of pass the whole thread by and not waste my time. Often enough I am very serious when I am joking, it's called funny logic. It’s better to laugh than to cry and suffer.
Very valid points you brought up. I agree with a lot of them, especially the part about the editing of the bible, it has been proven yet many Christians still treat the bible as the word of God.
Greek One, I love it, when I first saw Earnest's post I thought to actually answer it seriously, but you have excelled in your answer, both factual and humorous, great stuff, poking fun at Earnest's attempt to muddy the waters!
Those anwers were not good enough, I guess we still can't throw out rhe baby along with the deep dirty bath water
I enjoyed the Greeks humour, I usually do. The serious answers were all wrong though:)
Maybe your right, Australians have become the new Jews of today.
You know Earnest. If more people would bother to actually research the bible itself and use more than the bible to research itself. They would be shocked at the information they would find. The sad part...There is actually free complete classes out there for both the Old and New testaments from the professors at Yale University...And I have offered the link to a few people and I was told, in not so many words, that their understanding of the bible was all they needed to know the truth. Those who wish to learn all they can about their faith will look regardless of the information found...and those who wish to live in the "religious dark ages" will never get past the inaccurate interpretations they claim as truth.
I'm aware they had such classes, but did not notice that they are free.
I was very serious as a religionist, and learned the whole darn thing, did a full bible study course in Hebrew Greek and English, joined the worlwide christian businesman's committee, argued with church leaders about doctrine and generally got in to it.
I am seeing arguments from some who don't know their own belief system, they just believe it with "faith" because it is a helluva lot easier than knowing about it and then deciding what they believe.
Here is the link. For yourself if interested...as well as someting to pass on to others if they are so inclined to expand their minds..
http://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies
Also there is other classes on the left hand side...
Thank you, that is an authoritative source and worth keeping.
Don't expect many to wish to use it...
I have a friend who may wish to use it, or more precisely a family member who is looking at the clergy as a potential career path.
He seems serious about it.
As an aside, a great friend of mine became a priest. We were in fits of laughter when he told us. We really thought it was one of his jokes! John would make an Australian shearer blush! He could swear like a trooper could our John.
He has been happily ensconced for about 20 years now.
He wanted to help kids, and found a niche in a church owned and run kids home.
I don't hear from him often these days, but we have had some great battles about religious belief in the past.
I am not a theologian, but I am pretty sure that indicating any of my answers are wrong violates the religious texts of all the major religions
That would not be a first for me I guess.
One wonders what people avoid to do when they participate in these discussions. Root Canal? Laundry? Cleaning the bathroom?
Another hilarious post earnest
1. Why does god hate amputees?
First you have to assume that god actually hates amputees and that would be wrong. Amputees can be saved like anybody else. As to their missing limbs growing back well we have to blame human nature for that. As Jesus walked, his signs and wonders were to illuminate the Jews, the miracles backed up his messiahship and played a role to convince the Jews that messiah had come. Nicodemus hits the nail on the head when he says, "no man can do the miracles you do unless he come from God". Signs and wonders (miracles) were necessary in Jesus time for different reasons than would happen today. Today we live by faith and curing cancer may not be a tactile a miracle as a growing appendage. If all christians were in perfect health and had limbs growing back all the time, it would be a sign of God, yes, but then people would come to christ for all the wrong reasons. I have a completely circumferencially scarred right leg with lymph edemia, If God were to heal that my faith would be altered in a negative way. Coming to God should never be a reason to be healed.
2. Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word.
I don't know what cult you were in but im glad you are out of it.
Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Jesus while he lived the law was still in effect after he died it was not in effect any longer. Jesus came to fulfill, yes! and that's it. Fulfill. The "all be fulfilled" has not occurred yet and God has promised to keep watch over his book.
3. Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus?
Matthew 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Mark 10:25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Luke 18:25 For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Jesus did not say impossible. He said it was hard. If we read further we find this man had his faith in his money not in God.
4. Did god create Cancer and aids
No he did not. Lets go back to the garden shall we.
...cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
Genesis 3:18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
Nature itself was subject to the dismissal of Adam from the garden. What God would have blessed and caused to be fruitful; Adam declined. Paul goes on to say:
Romans 8:22 For we know that the whole creation groans and travails in pain together until now.
Biblically where God does not bless, is cursed. If people stray from the natural way or Gods chosen way, then the blessings of God are not found there and where God is not actively blessing, bad things happen. There is also some dispute that aids was manufactured in some lab somewhere by the government (america i think) to control population. I think you've heard that story but you do like to blame God for everything, dontcha
5. Bible Revisions
There are lots of translations, some are just stupid ones, others are cleverly devised (NIV) but we today have access to the original scriptures and personally i don't see such a huge digression as you like to purport, but i don't have lots of faith in what you purport either. Get a king james, its a difficult read but it makes ya think.
6. Second Commandment
You keep misquoting.
You shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not BOW down to them nor serve them.
the graven images were not to be worshiped. A cross is not in the earth or the water or in heaven above.
7. Jesus Loves? in Revelation 2:23.
Again you have conveniently grabbed one verse and used it out of context. Until you correct this programming malfunction i will not debate these topics with you. Context is so important. Do you remember the lake of fire, the second death? If you read the other scriptures around the one you took out of context the answer is in verse 24. People who are involved in the depths of satan will go to the lake of fire.
8. Allegory - The bible states that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years old, Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
You will have to read Genesis chapter 1 and 2. As to allegory. The bible never states that this is allegory, allegory is only found by allegorical usage.
9. How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
First off, Jesus is not responsible. Why do we blame Jesus for this war and not the others? We need to ask why is Jesus responsible for the massacres incurred by Genghis khan? and all the others who had an unjesus agenda. Come on. Give this one up already.
10. whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin". Is it true that paedophiles and child killers can be forgiven and get in to heaven but disbelievers can't?
Even people who rant against God and call him a sky fairy can repent and be forgiven in Gods eyes, although the human race may never forgive them. People who are on the right track with God will never commit pedophilia nor kill a child, if they do, their connection with God is poor, a lie or a deception. True faith in God and living for God does no evil but loves all. So just to be clear, God will forgive everyone but they have to actually be a christian in the witness of their lives fruitfulness.
Hope this helped. It was pretty much a no brainer. Not much of a standard for one who studied in one side of the bible and out the other.
Would this be one of those appropriate times to sound the buzzer, brother?
Jeremiah 30:17
For I will restore health to you And heal you of your wounds,' says the LORD
Hosea 6:1
Come, and let us return to the LORD; For He has torn, but He will heal us; He has stricken, but He will bind us up.
eremiah 17:14
Heal me, O LORD, and I shall be healed
Psalm 30:2-3
LORD my God, I cried out to You,And You healed me.
That makes no sense considering there are many believers who do not stray from your god, yet "bad things" happen to them, like cancer. How do you explain that?
We'll make sure to remind you grab verses and use them out of context, too.
Perfect.
Beelzedad,
You bring up a good point. The Bible says that God heals people, but the death rate is still 100%. So bad things must be happening to good and bad people. In fact, if being crucified is a bad thing, then 'bad things' even happened to Jesus.
So how does Christianity explain this?
First of all, we can rule out the possibility that mankind suffers because God doesn't love us. We can rule this out because Jesus gave up his life for us, and if this isn't sacrificial love, I don't know what is.
Second, the Bible explains that sin is the cause of our suffering and death. It even causes suffering in nature (think pollution). Sometimes we can link someone's suffering with their sin. For example, that guy has aids because he slept with 100 prostitutes. But other times we can't link someone's suffering with their own sin. The gal who is the faithful wife to the previous guy also ends up with aids.
Third, the Christian hope is not near-sighted. Jesus' resurrection gives us hope, and Paul wrote in one of his letters something along the lines that we don't grieve as those without hope (but we still grieve). We have something to look forward to (resurrection and perfect healing).
So, that's how Christianity makes sense out of 'bad things'. How does naturalism make sense out of 'bad things'?
No, you're just dismissing that out of hand.
Your Jesus did not "give up his life" - the myth goes such that he was crucified by the Romans, in other words, they took his life. That had nothing to do with "sacrificial love".
A person who committed a crime and is sent to the gas chamber does not "give up his life".
You still haven't explained why good, god fearing Christians get cancer? Or, why good, god fearing Christians might get aids from a needle or blood transfusion.
You are simply stating that whenever anything bad happens to good, god fearing Christians, some sin must be involved that you cannot account, but you'll believe it anyways.
I saw only belief in your explanation, no sense was evident at all.
You're joking, right? Do you actually believe nature makes choices as to what will happen to certain people and not others? Hilarious.
Ya cant take the life of someone who is God. Is this what you believe?
Matthew 26:53 Think you that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Matthew 26:54 But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
Jesus died to fulfill the scriptures. That was one of His many reasons.
Garden of Gethsemane before the crucifixion when the cohort came to arrest Jesus.
Roman floggings are meant not leave survivors. Bits of glass and metal were attached to the ends and those pieces just tore the guts out of people, usually. The power of God kept the body of Jesus alive for 6 hrs after that. He was flogged 3 times. His blood dripped to the ground for 6 hrs. His forehead bled. He had nails through his wrists and feet. Could any mere mortal live that long? The ones next to him were tied, not nailed and they were not whipped either. Crucifixion was meant to be a slow death, the life just ebbed away, drained slowly. Near the point of death the person had no strength left, eventually their legs couldnt hold them up and they suffocated.
BUT
Mark 15:37 "And Jesus cried with a LOUD voice, and gave up the ghost.
Mark 15:38 And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.
Mark 15:39 And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he SO cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God".
Why did the centurion think that.. because he had seen many crucifixions and the life ebbed away and none had strength, but this mans death was unusual.
AND
John 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.
When people die the head drops after death. This head was bowed and then he died.
No, it would appear that is what you believe. But, if that's your rationale, then it isn't any more valid than saying, "God did it." And, if that is the case, that is your one and only argument for everything. Now that you've made your one and only argument, you can bow out.
I think you're trying to make a point there, somewhere. You're trying to say that some people die sooner than later after being crucified, is that right?
Or, is your point such that we are to believe someone was right there, Johnny on the spot, quoting a centurion?
Beelzedad,
You asked us to explain how bad things can happen to good people, and I gave you the Christian explanation for suffering.
If nature doesn't care who suffers and who doesn't, and you're a part of nature, do you care?
Perhaps, but it didn't explain reality, hence it is full of holes and begs the question.
I did not say that, what I said is that nature does not make choices as to who will get cancer and who will not when compared with the religious belief that sin is a deciding factor in those choices.
Yes, I am part of nature as are you, however we don't decide who will get cancer and who won't, do we? Does any other part of nature make those decisions?
hahahahahahaha beelie.... sound of the buzzer dude
jer 30:17 is out of context
Jeremiah 30:15 Why criest thou for thine affliction? thy sorrow is incurable for the multitude of thine iniquity: because thy sins were increased, I have done these things unto thee.
The key contextual word is RESTORE in verse 17.
Hosea 6 the key word is RETURN
Jer 17:14 you did not even finish... "for you are my praise". There are no blanket promises. Each condition for prosperity is attached to a condition. IF God is not their praise, shall they be healed?
You are really in wayyyyyyyyyy over your head.
as to me pickin verses out of context ----------- PROVE IT! i just did to yours neener neener.
I grow weary of your lies and mistruths and posts that just aim to demean and slander
Nice post jncasia the folly of mans ego is so easily witnessed in these atheist spewings.
So what? Jeremiah 30:17 states quite emphatically that god did in fact heal and restore his health, which would appear to refute your claim:
"Coming to God should never be a reason to be healed."
Again, so what, it still refutes your claim.
That doesn't matter at all, it still refutes your claim that believers do come to god to get healed.
Refuting your claims is as easy as drinking water while swimming in a lake.
But, I do understand why you would say such a thing when your claims are refuted.
again you miss the context. I was gonna erase my asking you to prove it because i thought.. oh sheesh, this will just be a war of context.
and i was right....
coming to jesus (for salvation) healing must never be the goal. In this context we come to jesus because we realize our need for God AS sinners. This was the context of the sentence you took out of context.
Once saved WE CAN ask Jesus to heal us, no problem, but when becoming christian, when needing salvation, we cannot come to God expecting our illnesses or missing limbs to be miraculously healed.
My claims can only be refuted if taken out of context.
One more shot and make sure you get the context correct this time.
In other words, if we don't accept YOUR interpretation of context, then it isn't valid.
Yup, exactly as I suspected. YOUR interpretation. Funny how it still does not support your claim, though, because those quotes and more just like them do indeed show that people were coming to god to be miraculously healed, whether you believe they should or shouldn't is irrelevant.
_________________
He even contradicts the bible he says he believes in.
James 5
14. Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:
15. And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.
Not only that, fair maiden, he does not even acknowledge the fact there are all kinds of threads on these forums alone in which many have asked for prayers to god to miraculously heal there sick kids, spouses, friends, whoever.
I think he has come up with his very own personal religion.
So glad you were entertained.
I must say I enjoyed this whitewash of the hate filled biblical entity.
The bone ignorant superstitious sexist goat herders who wrote this dribble would have been delighted!
It being a no-brainer would have been helpful.
Now now don't go gettin all angry because what you thought was a good post turned out to be crap again.
But do keep trying i enjoy showing you the light of context and proper interpretation, you need it.
In view of the Unsuccessfulness of your post i am surprised you racistly insult goat herders. I dare say they could teach you a thing or two.
I be thinkin you be feelin pretty embarassed over this ruined post of yours
I am so embarrassed!
My life is now in ruin due to the mess I have made of all my posts.
If only I had learned all the deep and meaningful things you tried to teach us all about the truth.
You are obviously one of the greatest minds of all time!
Over flattery is just another compensation device y'know, like the small man who rides a big truck.
Dig deep, speak the truth. I can tell the difference.
Yes I know! I have been on the wrong side of your brilliance before!
Formidable! A legend in your own mind.
Good.
Now that you agree
Perhaps you are fertile soil and not rock anymore.
Like I said... a legend in your own mind.
Aren't you fed up with being wiped out every time you make one of your proclamations yet?
Half the people in this forum have had you for breakfast..... it has been more like a feast!
When all is said and done, the world today is no better than at any time in history. Whether God exists or doesn't exist, he is impotent or reluctant to make the world a better place.
Evil is and has always been dominant. No one has to be taught or reminded to be evil, they do however have to be taught or reminded to be good.
Punishing people for an eternity as the believers believe is cruel if true. Demonic would be a better word.
Genesis and the Garden of Eden rank right up there with Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Punishing two newbies, with no life experience of training, and allowing the evil to be in their garden puts the blame on God not them. To create billions and billions of humans just to punish the act of two is also demonic.
Many believers are looking forward to going to Heaven, yet they have no idea what or where is Heaven. They also have no idea what they will do there for Eternity.
One thing for sure it won't be a continuation of your earthly life, friends, family etc. There will be only one TV station and it would be the pray to God channel. You could win the duty to clean and polish the throne, but billions of people would be also trying to get that privilege.
Now if you go to Hell, you would be forced to watch porno, do drugs, and do all the things that would put you in jail.
you talk of making the world a better place. How much of the world follow Gods ways? Lets think corporately for a minute. I have a company and i have rules to be abided by in a company but nobody follows them. Have i failed at making my company better? If i don't get rid of those who rebel, i have, but God is more merciful than me. You apply 'God makes no difference' but God has instructed ways to make a difference but people don't follow them.
Should you really then say God has made no difference?
What about the people that God has made a difference in? They go about trying to make a difference in others and their world, sorry the impact is not enough to make a difference in the world but today God makes a difference in people, one at a time and when the numbers of believers out number the number of unbelievers a different sentence will be formed that will read like this, "wow, God has made this world a better place".
Also you subscribe to a belief in the garden of eden that you cannot believe. There are other interpretations. A literal snake who tricks eve into eating of the apple is not an interpretation i subscribe to. I believe there to be much allegory and metaphor in this chapter.
You can read more about the serpent here
http://hubpages.com/hub/Tet-shtn-and-the-garden
Hell is also a catholic doctrine to inspire fear and control and keep the masses in the church. Again a doctrine that i do not adhere to:
You can read more about this here:
http://hubpages.com/hub/why-I-chose-not … ve-in-Hell
This is not to purport my own hubs, score is irrelevant to me. I just wanted to show you that there are other interpretations that are just as allowable. God bless the person who can live believing in a literal snake and keep in the ways of God, but if you can't do that then consider other options before blasting your laser gun.
1. Why does god hate amputees? -Because growing limbs back would be a much too vulgar display of power.......
2. Biblical Law - Matthew 5:17-18
Unfortunately so called liberal laws prohibit us true Christians from exercising our God given right to child endangerment.
3. Eye of a needle
Money makes the world-go-round, I prefer to sit on the stretch limmo shaped horsey!
4. Did god create Cancer and aids
Yes, to punnish the bad people who secretly act good all the time but inside are just a bunch of meanies.
5. Bible Revisions
The bible was never revised, it was origionally written in english.
6. Second Commandment
I honestly have no Idea, I never have, but rest assured all the ones who do will burn forever.....
7. Is Jesus really a child killer?
Yeah, he was a gun toting meat eating, republican. But historically speaking he only went on a few murderous rampages.
8. Allegory - Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
What the heck does allegory mean? That's a look up.
9. How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
Jesus is actually responsible for every death that ever happened since the begining [7000 years ago?]. Shame on you for underestimating his power.
10. The only real SIN.
This is a misinterpertation of what is being said, the only real sin is me not finishing off this plate of chocolate covered bon-bons sitting in front of me.
Onusonus
Mmmmm,
1. Growing limbs back would be a much too vulgar display of power.......
I may convert to Christianity if they could grow back a limb rather than blow up limbs in holly wars.
2. Biblical Law - Matthew 5:17-18 Liberal laws prohibit us true Christians from exercising our God given right to child endangerment.
Many Christians are not Christ like; anyway, Are liberal Christian anti children? US liberal are mostly Christians and their leader too, I would vote them out of power too, try atheist for change and hope, they can't do worst.
3. Eye of a needle
Money makes the world-go-round; I prefer to sit on the stretch limo shaped horsey!
Be fair, give everyone a stretch limo and eat cake every day, why wait for heaven?
4. Did god create Cancer and aids
Yes, to punish the bad people who secretly act well all the time but inside are just a bunch of meanies.
Where, How and What are all these bad people, are they the poor people. Or lesbians.
5. Bible Revisions
The bible was never revised, it was originally written in English.
T
hen Hebrew and Creek are all originally written in BS
6. Second Commandment
I honestly have no Idea, I never have, but rest assured all the ones who do will burn forever.....
Then will you set the Vatican on fire or wait for God to do that
7. Is Jesus really a child killer?
Yeah, he was a gun toting meat eating, republican. But historically speaking he only went on a few murderous rampages.
Like Christian soliders burning villages in the Middle East
8. Allegory - Where does it say in the bible that it is allegory?
What the heck does allegory mean? That's a look up.
You were the only one who voted that the Earth is between 6,000 and 8,000 years on my survey
9. How does it feel knowing that Jesus is responsible for 3 times as many deaths as Hitler?
Jesus is actually responsible for every death that ever happened since the beginning [7000 years ago?]. Shame on you for underestimating his power.
Then it is not safer to run away from Jesus rather than to always live in fear, murder and quilt
10. The only real SIN.
This is a misinterpretation of what is being said, the only real sin is me not finishing off this plate of chocolate covered bon-bons sitting in front of me.
Is it not better to adjust our mistakes in life? rather than to keep fattening up on sin.
Sorry answers are not good enough as it went over like a die cow,
Someone else give it a try.
I can't. Apparently I am one of the bad people who got cancer.
My religious friend got cancer, but he must be even worse than me, cos he prayed and died, whereas I am still here.
I do however realise from some of the posts that some religionists would like me to have been the one who died to support their beliefs.
Not all of them think this way, some will say he got "called home" whereas I stay to suffer here in life!
I wonder if their lives have been so bad that they think death is a better alternative?
That would explain a lot.
I am sure, fear of Hell is the greatest motivator for Christian membership, and their up side is for social reasons.
Fear is really about the unknowns, once people understand living and death surround them continually, then health and what we can forget, (for example like hell) will bring us higher energy and happiness within.
And you saw all this first hand right?
No jesus, no god, no fairies at the bottom of the garden, just one psychotic book written by the morally challenged.
It would be hilarious if not for the loons who believe it then foist their hateful junk on the rest of us.
I cannot answer any of these questions to suit you I'm sure.
I will say the cross for me is not an image I pray to.
I do not like images of the Virgin Mary or Jesus as many of the Catholic churches do.
I only look at the cross as a reminder of Jesus being crucified on the cross.
I do not own one. I remember when the big WWJD movement was going around. Everybody wore those stupid bracelets. I looked at them as advertisements that the wearer was in fact a Christian and one would think they would let their actions be a witness to others. Such was not the case. I never wore one of those bracelets, because I am sure many could find flaws in my actions at certain times.
Sorry I could not answer any of your questions if I tried. I only know I believe there is a God thats all. I believe. I cannot prove nor do I want to, I believe faith is all I need.
If you want answers you will never find them, because thats not what it is about.
So Dianne you will hold to those beliefs even if the evidence for it being wrong was stacked to the ceiling even though you seem to be saying you can't answer the questions?
With that amount of biblical knowledge I would not even post, let alone try to defend my beliefs, I would be questioning them if in that position myself.
I don't know I would have to see the evidence is it accurate and tangible. Is it scientifically proven without a doubt.
I suppose I could be wrong, just I suppose you could be wrong.
The truth of the matter is we will not know till we die, or Jesus comes back, do I think I stand a better chance than you to get "into heaven" no I do not.
I think it would be easier to prove their is a God than to prove there isn't, just because it is easier to prove something exists than it is to prove something doesn't exist.
what I mean by that is, many years ago, science has proven many things, such as atoms, molecules, etc, Something that at one time no one knew existed.
I actually believe in science, and the scientific method. But I also beleive anything is possible, because science finds new things all the time that was once thought impossible.
And sorry I did not post to show how much knowledge I had, I can't answer those because I am not in the mind of God.
Nice post Dianne, you have been very reasonable.
I agree, science is moving very fast and discovering new things all the time.
I'm not so sure dying will tell us anything. Once blood supply to the brain stops, so does having a brain to process with.
To me, religion is a function of that very brain. A mechanism as old as the human race, and a direct response to the subconscious fear of death from the amygdala.
And who knows you could be right, or wrong. As for myself, not everything is so cut and dry.
There are so many unexplained questions, and I look forward to the answers however that may come. Dying won't tell us anything you are right if there is no God, as you've said once the brain stops thus so does the brain process.
However, if there is a God then there is a "spirit world" then we will know. Of course, some of us would not be happy with that, because that means there is a judgement. Myself included.
One question if I may, Did you ever believe at some point in your life or have you always been a non-believer?
Just curious....
Like yourself and I feel many others, I would love to live on, it is the biggest attraction to belief.
In answer to your question, I was bought up with a very religious mother, but thought from an early age that it was not true.
Indoctrination is hard to shake though, and when I was a young I became a born again christian through being told about religion again by an evangelistic Baptist (Australian variety,) not like the American version)
I was selling children/'s life insurance at the time, and I joined him in a partnership. He hammered on religion all day when we were travelling in his car and in the office.
He was most unusual, in that he and his brother and father had owned a building company that went belly up before completing the houses they were building.
He went without half the floor in his house, while he went and finished all the work they had started on other peoples homes.
My Dad was a big influence on my life, so I had inherited his morals, and admired this guy for his grand gesture.
He also impressed me with how he used his money.
He would add up how much he needed for the month, then get on his worldwide radio and locate charities to give ALL the rest of his money to them.
I was totally in to it! I not only became a christian, I also joined the christian busineman's committee, studied the bible in 3 languages for 2 years and pushed my religion on others.
We were motivated, selling a million dollars worth of insurance and joining the million dollar "round table" which is for the big boys of insurance.
The story is very long and convoluted, but to make it brief. the minister and he absconded with a million bucks they had raised for an old folks home!
I went into my own business and hit the front quickly, making a lot of money in a short time. The money worried me, as I had never been rich before, so I decided to do 6 years of psychotherapy with the best shrink in the country. It was strange! I was supposed to wait 2 years for an appointment, but someone cancelled so I got started straight away as money was no problem by then. I tackled it with as much enthusiasm as I did religion culminating in reading ALL of Jung, Hillman, Von Franz and other post Jungians. I have literally hundreds of books on the subject as I still read the latest info till today.
That is a quick glance at how I overcame my indoctrination.
I just realised I have written a helluva lot. I should have answered the question with brevity.
whoa, sounds like you were not only in the religion so to speak but ate slept and breathed it, literally.
well I was not brought up that way I guess my parents were only mediocre Chrisitans at best, and I am much the same way. I believe but am not interested in pushing it onto people I try to answer if I can but I know I am ill equipped really to do much good.
Funny story though, My husband went to work one day and was assigned to train a new guy. This new guy was all religious going on about how good Jesus is and was very annoying as my husband put it. Now my husband believes but is by no means a "good christian" by any standard. I was really surprised he didn't tell this new guy where to go. He held his tongue, and got through the day.
I myself have had much the same experience with people coming up to me trying to push it on me telling me to read my bible, pray, etc.
I have found that the best response is to say I am not interested and walk away. If I was forced to be around them in his situation, I have been known to ask them to respect my wishes not the continue and if not then go straight to management. That has thus far stopped any unwanted pushers.
I know you are well versed in the bible. I am not, nor do I want to be, because I am not entirely convinced that it is completely true.
Anyhow thanks for answering my question.
as for your ten questions. Well, somethings are just not for us to know.
And why would we want to know everything? I kinda like a little mystery.
Once surfed a huge wave in Hawaii and had a bad crush, my first thought reincarnated as a sand crab. Still not know what end was up or down I started dealing with God if he helps me live, I will give him lots lots of money. Of course my fearlessness won out and surface again. If I was planted in sand my afterlife would have continue into some other life form or another, much like being buried into the soil. I was not imagining living in some extreme happiness heaven smile down on earth and hell forever
Point is, God can be everything and afterlife dose continue in nature in some way. Why pay some bully big white man in the sky some sand dollars from his own sea banks, just like another wizard of OZ trick.
I was at Waikiki a few years back, and got scared spit-less when I saw all the blood in the water from coral cuts the surfers had. I didn't go in!
And yet, there are so many, many more questions that have been explained and the ones that haven't been explained yet have nothing to do with the existence of gods, they are questions that are extensions to other explanations.
Science does not prove things without a doubt. Science provides the very best explanation for a phenomenon with supporting evidence.
A religious belief does not have any supporting evidence and does not offer the best explanation. And, when we try to make predictions based on science or a religious belief, the belief fails almost every time.
So, it is the intelligent mind that can decide if it wants to accept the very best explanation based on supporting evidence or the religious belief based entirely on faith.
Agreed. However, in this case we can do neither. Hence, we need to rely on the very best explanations based on supporting evidence as faith does not offer proof of existence, non-existence or an explanation. It offers nothing but faith.
Perhaps, but science has found absolutely nothing that would support the existence of gods. So, if you believe that gods are impossible and science will find that they are possible, what does that say about ones faith and their religious beliefs?
Earnesthub,
I think she has some good company. I found the following quote, "Even if there were no actual evidence in favor of Christianity...we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories."
Actually, I made that quote up. The real quote is by Richard Dawkins, and he says, "Even if there were no actual evidence in favor of Darwinian theory..we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories."
Your ten questions are both funny and witty. They just might shut up those obnoxious (over-the-top) Jesus freaks. It's too bad, however, that Christians in general are being perceived as a bunch of superior-position taking fanatics. There are some very intelligent and thoughtful and humble Christians. Late Mister Rogers comes to my mind.
Thank you. I believe there are good people in every walk of life, but some of their beliefs?
I like reality. I have had to deal with a lot of it in my life.
I spent a lot of years as a people observer in my own businesses, and have needed to be broad minded as I was dealing with the Hells Angels, Coffin cheaters, Road Rebels and many other bike gangs for many years in my motorcycle shops. I also had to deal with the god bothering bikers for god or whatever they called themselves.
Later I had other businesses including an International business consultancy I started in the late seventies and owned the company until recently, which took me to America and South East Asia, where I saw a lot of religion and poverty.
Unlike you, I have to know all the facts.... part of my make-up I suppose.
It is difficult to deal with bike gangs if one has a fixed position, so I change with what I learn.
Nice hearing your story, and getting to know you a little better!
Hi Deborah. You told that very well, and once again I find the information to be accurate.
I don't agree with it, (I hardly need to tell you that.) but that is what was written as I understand it too.
Give your little man an extra cuddle from me.
__________________
Hi Earnest
I know you don't and you don't even have to say it.
As a matter of fact,. I just interpret what is written,. but it doesn't mean I necessarily believe it.
I could write many hubs on different subjects,. but when I do people say I am a witch or evil.blah blah blah. Yet if someone writes a murder mystery they are not accused of being a killer.
Pretty stupid for people to judge someone for what they write about or sell.
Thank you for your kind words. I will hug my boy for you.
Thank you! I bet he is the apple of his mommy's eye!
I am with my three little one's as I write, so plenty of love around here at the moment!
It is strange that people make assumptions about other people's morals based on their own beliefs about witches etc.
You know me... publish and be dammed, I write a lot of things that get me in to arguments, but I write them anyway.
I would love to read a hub that was controversial enough to bring on a good old fashioned witch woppin! That would amuse me no end.
Deborah Sexton
I trust the witches more than the snow white type
Not much for blond thinking, I don’t mean hair colour
The definition I have of blasphemy would mean 30,000 or so religions christanity would need to "accept" to avoid blaspheming against one of them
What are the chances of you, in your limited culture choosing the right one and only religion?
This is not aimed at any particular person or belief system.
Here are a few momotheistic Abrahamic ones to consider.
Bábísm
Bahá'í
Bahá'í Faith
Orthodox Bahá'í Faith
Islam
Kharijites
Nation of Islam
Shiite
Alawites
Ismailis
Jafari
Zaiddiyah
Ghulat including
Alevi / Bektashi
Ahl-e Haqq
Yazidi
Druze
Ahmadi
Sunni
Berailvi
Deobandi
Hanafi
Hanbali
Maliki
Mu'tazili
Shafi'i
Wahhabi
Sufism
Naqshbandi
Bektashi
Chishti
Mevlevi
Zikri
Judaism (see also: Jew; Hebrews)
Contemporary divisions
Karaite Judaism
Rabbinic Judaism
Orthodox Judaism
Haredi Judaism
Hassidic Judaism
Modern Orthodox Judaism
Reform Judaism
Conservative Judaism (Masorti)
Reconstructionist Judaism (arguably not a religion)
Humanistic Judaism (arguably not a religion)
Historical Sects
Hasmoneans
Essenes
Pharisees
Sadducees
Zealots
Sicarii
sects that believed Jesus was a prophet
Ebionites
Elkasites
Nazarenes
Crypto-Jews
Marranos
Conversos
Christianity (see List of Christian denominations)
Eastern Orthodoxy
Roman Catholicism
Oriental Orthodoxy (Monophysitism)
Nestorianism
Protestantism
Anabaptists
Anglicans
Baptists
Lutherans
Methodists
Pentecostals
Reformed
Calvinism
Presbyterian
Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)
Unitarians
Waldensians
Latter-day Saints
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Community of Christ
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Seventh-day Adventist
Jehovah's Witnesses
Messianic Judaism (not actually Judaism but rather Jewish-rite Christianity)
Samaritans
Mandaeanists
Rastafarians
Black Hebrews
Hebrew Christians
[edit]
Dharmic religions
Religions with a concept of Dharma, also major religions of historical India
Hinduism (see also Contemporary Hindu movements)
Agama Hindu Dharma (Javanese Hinduism)
Shaivism
Shaktism
Smartism
Vaishnavism
Gaudiya Vaishnavism
ISKCON (Hare Krishna)
Sri Krishna Chaitanya Mission
Six major schools and movements of Hindu philosophy
Samkhya
Nyaya
Vaisheshika
Purva mimamsa
Vedanta (Uttar Mimamsa)
Advaita Vedanta
Integral Yoga
Yoga
Ashtanga Yoga
Hatha yoga
Siddha Yoga
Tantric Yoga
Ayyavazhi
Shramana Religions
Buddhism (see Schools of Buddhism)
Mahayana
Nikaya schools (which have historically been called Hinayana in the West)
Theravada
Vajrayana (Tantric Buddhism)
Jainism
Digambara
Shvetambara
Panth Religions
Sikhism
Kabir Panth
Dadu Panth
[edit]
Other revealed religions
Believers in one God, also called classical monotheism, who follow an Indo-European culture of belief, philosophy and angelology.
Zoroastrianism
Magus (see Three Wise Men)
Gnosticism
Basilidians
Bogomils
Borborites
Cainites
Carpocratians
Cathars
Marcionism (not entirely Gnostic)
Ophites
Valentinians (see Valentinius)
Hinduism (Vaishnavism)
[edit]
Indigenous religions
The orally transmitted canon of indigenous peoples, many involving some variant of animism and many defunct
African religions
Akamba mythology
Akan mythology
Ashanti mythology
Bushongo mythology
Bwiti
Dahomey mythology
Dinka mythology
Efik mythology
Egyptian mythology
Ibo mythology
Isoko mythology
Khoikhoi mythology
Lotuko mythology
Lugbara mythology
Pygmy mythology
Tumbuka mythology
Yoruba mythology
Zulu mythology
African religions in the New World
Kumina
Obeah
Santería (Lukumi)
Vodou
Candomblé
Macumba
Umbanda and Quimbanda
Xango
European religions
Anglo-Saxon mythology
Basque mythology
Druidry (Celtic Religion)
Finnish mythology
Germanic paganism
Norse mythology
Greek religion
Greek mythology
Mystery religions
Eleusinian Mysteries
Mithraism
Pythagoreanism
Roman religion
Roman mythology
Slavic mythology
Asian religions
Babylonian and Assyrian religion
Babylonian mythology
Chaldean mythology
Sumerian mythology
Bön (Indigenous Tibetan belief)
Chinese mythology
Shinto
Oomoto
Tengrism (Indigenous Mongol, Tartar & Kazakh belief)
Yezidis (Modified indigenous Kurdish belief)
Native American religions
Abenaki mythology
Aztec mythology
Blackfoot mythology
Chippewa mythology
Creek mythology
Crow mythology
Guarani mythology
Haida mythology
Ho-Chunk mythology
Huron mythology
Inuit mythology
Iroquois mythology
Kwakiutl mythology
Lakota mythology
Lenape mythology
Navaho mythology
Nootka mythology
Pawnee mythology
Salish mythology
Selk'nam religion
Seneca mythology
Tsimshian mythology
Ute mythology
Zuni mythology
Oceanic religions
Australian Aboriginal mythology
Balinese mythology
Maori mythology
Modekngei (Republic of Palau)
Nauruan indigenous religion
Polynesian mythology
[edit]
Neopagan or revival religions
Modern religions seeking to recreate indigenous, usually pre-Christian, beliefs and practices
Church of All Worlds
Dievturiba
Germanic Neopaganism also called Ásatrú or Odinism
Hellenic polytheism (modern revivalist forms)
Judeo-Paganism
Maausk
Neo-druidism
Summum
Taarausk
Wicca
Alexandrian Wicca
Dianic Wicca (Feminist Wicca)
Gardnerian Wicca
Faery Wicca
Feri Tradition
[edit]
Non-revealed religions
Philosophies not transmitted by a divine prophet
Carvaka
Confucianism
Deism
Fellowship of Reason
Spiritual Humanism
Mohism
Taoism
[edit]
Left-Hand Path religions
Faiths teaching that the ultimate goal is separating consciousness from the universe, rather than being absorbed by it
Dragon Rouge
Satanism
LaVeyan Satanism
Church of Satan
Order of Nine Angles
Setianism also spelled Sethianism
Temple of Set
The Storm
Quimbanda
[edit]
Syncretic religions
Faiths created from blending earlier religions or that consider all or some religions to be essentially the same
Arès Pilgrim Movement
Cao Dai
Falun Dafa (Falun Gong)
Huna
Konkokyo
Law of One
Manichaeism
Unitarian Universalism
Universal Life Church
Tenrikyo
Theosophy
Seicho-No-Ie
[edit]
Entheogen religions
Religions based around divinely inspiring substances
Ayahuasca-based beliefs
Church of the Universe (marijuana sacrament)
Peyotism
THC Ministry
[edit]
New religious movements
See List of new religious movements for a list based on other sources
See hereunder for religions founded since 1850 with small followings
Monotheistic NRMs
Direct Worship of the Actual God
Indigenous NRM's
Burkhanism
Cargo cults
Ghost Dance
Native American Church
African Diaspora / Latin American NRM's
Rastafari movement
Umbanda
Candomble
Kardecist Spiritism
Hindu-oriented NRM's
Sai Baba/Sathya Sai Organisation
Hare Krishna
Transcendental Meditation
Sant Mat
Swaminarayan
Vedanta Society
Osho/Rajneeshism
Meher Baba (actually a Zoroastrian)
Oneness University
Aum Shinrikyo (Aleph)
Eckankar
NRM's with Islamic Roots
Subud
Ahmadi
Dances of Universal Peace
Nation of Islam (Black Muslims)
Christian-oriented NRM's
Unification Church
Jesus People
Children of God
People's Temple
Pentecostalism
Holiness movement
Iglesia ni Cristo
Buddhist-oriented NRM's
Soka Gakkai
Won Buddhism
Hoa Hao
Friends of the Western Buddhist Order
Chinese-oriented NRM's
Way of Former Heaven sects, including
I-Kuan Tao ("Way of Unity"),
T'ung-shan She ("Society of Goodness"),
Tien-te Sheng-chiao ("Sacred Religion of Celestial Virtue"),
Daoyuan ("Sanctuary of the Tao"),
Tz'u-hui Tang ("Compassion Society").
Falun Gong ("Dharma Wheel Work," a qigong meditation group)
Japanese-oriented NRM's
Tenrikyo
Seicho no Ie
Johrei (Johrei Movement - Sekai Kyusei Kyo Izunome Kyodan)
Reiki
Oomoto
Soka Gakkai
Aum Shinrikyo (Aleph)
Korean-oriented NRM's
Chondogyo
Jeung San Do
Juche (The personality cult of North Korean leaders)
Unification Church
Vietnamese-oriented NRM's
Caodaism
Hoa Hao
Malaysian-Oriented NRM's
Sky Kingdom
Western Magical / Esoteric Groups
Kardecist Spiritism
Theosophy
Agni Yoga
Anthroposophy
Arcane School
Association for Research and Enlightenment
Church Universal and Triumphant
Golden Dawn
Gurdjieff Work
AMORC
Spiritualism
Eckankar
Thelema
Argenteum Astrum
Fraternitas Saturni
Ordo Templi Orientis
Typhonian Ordo Templi Orientis
Process Church of the Final Judgement
Order of the Solar Temple
White Supremacist Religions
Church of Jesus Christ Christian
World Church of the Creator (Creativity Movement)
Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan [1]
Black Supremacist Religions
Nuwaubianism
Alien-based religions
The Aetherius Society [2]
Raelism
Scientology
Church of Scientology
Free Zone
Urantia, Book of
Universe people
Other NRM's
Antoinism
Breatharianism (Air cult)
Brianism
Elan Vital
Faithists of Kosmon
Virus, The Church of
Tony Samara
[edit]
Parody or mock religions
Groups that poke fun at other religions or religion in general
Discordianism
Church of the SubGenius (The cult of Bob Dobbs)
Church of Jesus Christ Elvis
Fictional religions turned Parody
Bokononism
Jedi census movement
Flying Spaghetti Monster (Pastafarianism)
Invisible Pink Unicorn
Kibology
Landover Baptist Church
Church of Emacs
[edit]
Fictional religions
See List of fictional religions
[edit]
Forms of religion or alternative beliefs
Agnosticism
Animism
Atheism
Ditheism (Dualism)
Henotheism
Monolatrism
Humanism
Secular Humanism
Kathenotheism
Maltheism
Monism
Monotheism
Panentheism
Pantheism
Cosmotheism
Polytheism
Shamanism
Suitheism
[edit]
Nonsectarian and trans-sectarian religious movements and practices
[edit]
Esotericism
Alchemy
Anthroposophy
Esoteric Christianity
Freemasonry
Gnosticism
Kabbalah
Occultism
Rosicrucian
Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
Confraternity of the Rose Cross
Rosicrucian Fellowship
Surat Shabda Yoga
[edit]
Mysticism
Christian mysticism
Gnosticism
Hindu mysticism
Tantra
Ananda Marga Tantra-Yoga
Yoga
Bhakti
Vedanta
Kabbalah (also part of Judaism)
Kabbalah Centre
Martinism
Merkabah (also part of Judaism)
Meditation
Spirituality
Sufism
Theosophy
[edit]
Magic (religion)
Astrology
Divination
Prophecy
Exorcism
Faith healing
Feng Shui
Hoodoo (Rootwork)
New Orleans Voodoo
Magick
Chaos magick
Enochian Magic
Grimoire magick
Goetic magick
Miracles
Pow-wow
Seid (shamanic magic)
Vaastu Shastra (Hinduism)
Witchcraft
[edit]
Ritualism
Prayer
Sacrifice
Animal sacrifice
Human sacrifice
Worship
[edit]
Organizations promoting Ecumenism
Dances of Universal Peace
Inter-religious Organisations
Source(s):
www.skeptic.com
www.csicop.org
Still prepared to die for yours because you "know" and your god told you you are right?
I don't like your odds. All these people feel as you do!
Wait a second, Are you saying that yoga is a religion? I thought it was just something girls do to make their butts look nice.
You're right, I didn't make the list as you can see, and in truth there are a few in there that don't belong. A few missing too!
I thought Yoga was for tightening wiggly bits and relaxing myself.
Yoga has historically been associated with India’s three great religious-cultural traditions—Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.
Thanks for that! I needed a connection with religion at least!
Put it onto a dartboard, take a shot.
Anything you hit will be no better than all the rest you miss.
So many of them do not impress me much
yet
Can't find anything inTaoism to rip apart, .
It was written 500 years before the bible
A lot of Taoism is stongly based on Nature, it's like a exciting ride flowing down the river
Can't beat Mother nature
Just went over Revelation? Good grief..!
all it is is is one punishment after another, like a CIA Torture Brief!
Gotta wounder, why Paychologicaly do we need God in our heads at all? Create it, and love it so much you punish it to death?
This is a Happy ending?
absolutely nuts..?
It is a major bun fight isn't it?
More torture rape and murder than the taliban handbook!
yep. got to agree
The Taliban got nothing on this Guy!
I think that several deciples said that Jesus told them to go out and heal the sick and cast out demons and such.
But did anyone except Paul say that everyone could do it?
Honestly .... just asking.
I think he told them to Spread the Gospel, not miracles.
I reckon we should write a new religious tome, one where believers all get their clocks cleaned for having the wrong religion would be a good place to start.
by Captain Redbeard 9 years ago
I just read a post from someone stating that Christianity is based on the Bible which stands to reason, "If Christianity is based off the bible then that means it would have never come to furition since the book would never have been written because no Christian would have existed before...
by Peeples 8 years ago
Can someone explain to me if most Christians follow Leviticus.It is my minimally informed belief that most Christians do not follow Leviticus because it was either A) part of the old testament or B) Was not written for Gentiles. I know that the majority of the laws in it are not followed by...
by Julie Grimes 7 years ago
I think that the Christian religion would have been entirely different, if Apostle Paul hadn't screwed things up. It is my firm belief that if Christians really want to be Christ-like, they need to have a dual faith based, religious, belief system. As it is, how can any of us Christians...
by Mark 13 years ago
I haven't been on HP for very long, but I have read through quite a few of the threads on here...I often see someone who claims to be "Christian" saying that "this is wrong" or "that is wrong" based off of a quote from the OT. But yet, I hear also that Jesus died for...
by Yoleen Lucas 10 years ago
You guys - I posted this in the Questions section, but because it turned into a full-blown discussion, HubPagers advised me to move it to Forums. Here it is:"Cult" is defined as a system of beliefs that doesn't work, but people cling to it because they fear "eternal hell"...
by ii3rittles 5 years ago
Is the bible against or okay with homosexuality?I have read scripture that goes both ways (no pun intended!) and I am honestly confused. Can some please quote scripture that shows God is against homosexuality or okay with it. And is it okay (with God) that I view it as wrong? I try not to in...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |