Rich and fame sometimes are closely related.For famous people its easy to stay rich both mentally and financially.One can retain both fame and richness if one's intention is clear and stay positive and focus in life.
How does fame mean less freedom? ( as opposed to being rich ,that is)
See if I was famous , Id automatically be rich anyway. So ya got the best of both worlds Maybe it depends how youre famous too See I was thinking famous like a "New Invention" or "Cure for Cancer" and the patent and all that comes long term
seems like apeksha started reading the thread from 2nd post...hehe nevermind... but darkside repeated one only many times Come on its not that difficult to leave 1
Frankly for me.. NONE Both are Addictive, Ego feeding, kinda Materialistic, Time dependent & need hell lot of "Down to earth" attitude to control them (Esp when they are in plenty) without which i dont feel its worth to anyone. But to choose one, i choose RICH That can fetch materialistic happiness and one can enjoy life to an extend depending upon his/her requirement.
Kinda...Yes it is ,out f these 2. Society means a lot in this world and to participate & be its part...one needs Moolah... & the requirement is more when one is a part of a family or those who dont believe in Singlehood ..hehe
P.S. now thank me for some traffic to this hub ..lol
Rich - as long as you could guarantee my riches wouldn't bring me any kind of fame. Can't think of anything worse than dodging paparazzi, worrying about my kids security, and having the tabloids pick my life, morals and fashion choices to pieces (my morals and fashion choices don't stand up to much scrutiny at the best of times).