This is an interesting article. It infers that atheists are more intellectual than believers. What do you think?
What article is this?
Although - I already agree with it.
Imagine that. Quick to assume anything that agrees with your faith and pride.
Hereis the story:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/science/scientists-investigate-if-atheists-brains-are-missing-a-god-spot/article1521557/
Hmm, I thought the agnostic folks were the most dazzling when it comes to overall cognitive function!
There are a few articles around positing the existence of a "God spot" in the brain of believers.
If there is one, then it doesn't imply atheists are more intellectual - because that would mean they had a God spot but were rationalizing it away.
What it would mean is that if someone has a "God spot", they're powerless - they don't get a choice, their brain is wired to believe in God. And if someone doesn't have a "God spot", it's impossible for them to believe in one.
However, I do take issue with your presumption that there is a single God (viz "believe in God"). But that is probably just semantics.
Can we postulate that if a "God spot" is proven to exist that there must have been a God that made it exist?
Also, if there are more atheists now (in percentage terms) does that mean that evolution is removing the "God spot"?
If so, does it follow that the God that made it exist is now no more, as "It" is not ensuing that the "God spot" is not evolved away?
'Twasn't too long ago that some men believed the g-spot was in a woman's throat too.
What a crock!
On a lighter note, coolbreeze---have you been listening to Mark? 'Cuz he dunno how to spell Christian either.
Zoinks! lol Brenda, do you believe everything you hear or do lack a sense of satire. I am laughing at the g-spot thing in the throat. lolololol
If you're trying to allude to the 70's porn "Deep Throat," it was actually her clit, not her g-spot, that was down her throat. And she was an anomaly, even in that film--never made out to be the norm.
I stand corrected. (My post was mostly a sarcastic comparison anyway). I think the rumor was that her clit was in her throat....
And she supposedly was pressured at gunpoint to perform in the porn films, and later became a fervent advocate against pornography.
Do you reckon maybe a better comparison woulda been if I'd said I have ocean-front property in Arizona to sell to those who believe there's a "God Spot"?
I saw deep throat in New York. The heckler was priceless!
without reading the article, maybe because some people actually think on their own, asking questions, pondering, reasoning... instead of simply accepting?
If they're missing something in their brain how can they infer they are more intellectual.
It's not that they are missing something in their brain, it's to study if there is any PART that differentiates believers vs non-believers. It's that while studied under times of prayer and meditation no "special spot" lit up, only expected areas of memory and emotion. Depending on what side your on, it's either functioning correctly or malfunctioning.
In Rorschach ink-blot studies, for instance, believers tended to see images that weren't there and non-believers tended to miss images that were present.
make of that what you will, I have yet to form an opinion.
An article can't infer anything. Infer means to draw a conclusion.
An article can imply something, though.
If the article is implying that atheists are more intellectual, I won't disagree. I've read several recently that draw the same conclusion.
It's a question of cause and effect. Are intellectual people more likely to question things in general? Or, do atheists become more intellectual by way of study?
Chrishtans analyze the bible from cover to cover, and that is a lot of reading.
But, atheists analyze all the other books. That's REALLY a lot of reading.
Good post Jen, but I was thinking....
Christians rationalize the Bible from cover to cover.
I know many incredibly smart people who are devout in their faith (which always beat the hell out of me).
I think nonbelievers have a common need for logic present in our brains.
The missing "God spot" is not in the brain but the heart.
They do have one of those don't they.
(Oh, fyi, I do not refer to the blood pump!)
Wow, that's the most god-like statement I've heard all day. Where's the smiley for sarcasm?
Yea, a little. Many atheists don't believe they have one. (I mean ARE one).
have what? A god-spot? Obviously not, otherwise that would make being an atheist counter-productive. I looked into some of these articles and the retort to "god-spot", was called a "gullibility spot".. I'm not judging, and don't want to step on toes here but I just wanted to point that out.
The whole thing is sort of impertinent, if there is or there isn't is an individual choice that is probably contingent on your level of consciousness. On that note in my life I have found many atheists to be more spiritual and more aware than many Christens. I had a guy not to long ago tell me he didn't believe in God and would never lie cheat or steal from anyone. On the other hand I have been around Christens that never walk the walk. If you know what I mean. Smart Dumb? Its over rated folks!
The ability to receive and give love unconditionally might be something that would be more pertinent. The if there is of if there isn't is so well droll. Aloha
wtf ? no way believers invent sht . atheists are a stagnate pond
I think this is the most important piece of the article:
"Dr. Zuckerman says, the research on atheism is just getting started. “We'll never fully understand religion until we can understand secularity,” he observes. “There are intellectual questions needing to be answered, because they have real-life, political consequences.”
Our dear Habee has two humongous God spots on her chest and she is very intelligent. I adore her god spots.
“There is a lot of evidence that religious beliefs flow very naturally from the way the mind is designed,” Dr. Shackelford says. It has long been believed, he says, that atheism is a harder position to maintain because it goes against the natural instinct to want to attach some kind of meaning to phenomena we can't explain. “Perhaps religion is natural, but not inevitable.”
I would say being spiritual is more natural and doesn't imply being religious. Depends on your take on religion as dogma.
Maybe this is why religion started to collapse with the Industrial revolution - the science that fired it provides an alternative to attach meaning to phenomena with the advantage that it can also explain some of them.
Yes, it is true, atheists are missing a 'God Spot' - it has been replaced with a brain.
Which, unfortunately, many use to distance themselves from their own humanity.
I thought they used it to distance themselves from having to spend an eternity in damnation and hellfire.
I know it's been working for me.
from their humanity?!? haha, that's hilarious. I think the people who are distancing themselves from their "humanity" are the people who aren't trying to be better people. Are you telling me that just because an atheist doesn't buy the outdated stories in a book means they are living their lives in a way that brings them further from their humanity? Ever notice that atheists supply less that 1% of the prison population?Christians supply 81%. Think about that and then lets talk about "humanity".
by PhoenixV 3 years ago
Why Don't Atheists Believe In God?
by John Harper 6 years ago
If scientists found proof that God existed, would you atheists then believe it?http://witscience.org/first-scientific-proof-god-found/
by Tessa Schlesinger 4 years ago
What do studies show about Atheists that Christians don't know?Only answers with a verified reference to a study will be accepted. This is because, quite often, people accept urban legend as fact. So Christians might not, for instance know that atheists know more about religion than religious...
by Claire Evans 8 years ago
Atheists often ask for proof of Jesus being the son of God. If Jesus came to earth and everyone realized He is the son of God, would you still reject Him as your saviour?
by Dwight Phoenix 5 years ago
What are the most annoying responses Christians give to questions atheists ask?I'm a christian and I think that it would be helpful in ministry, if Christians new a bit more about how atheists felt about a Christian's rebuttal
by Claire Evans 17 months ago
It's easy to deconvert to atheism because they are disappointed, hurt or because they have lost their faith due to God making sense. It's harder to suddenly make a rational atheists convert to Christianity, which is faith-based. How does it happen?
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|