jump to last post 1-18 of 18 discussions (83 posts)

Weiner admits to sending photo

60
DannyMaioposted 6 years ago
DEMOCRAT Anthony Weiner Admits to sending Photo's and other inappropriate behavior. Lets see all the far left who believed him and was sticking up for this fool come clean! Lets see how you far lefties spin this. The man is a dog and should resign! Could not have happened to a better big mouth a$$hole.
reply report
1. 60
  wbfreeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I know. Isn't it something how liberals always make up excuses for their lying, corrupt politicians and bring up someone else to take attention off of their filthy selves? As if that excuses or lessens the evil they've done. Amazing.
  
  This jerk Weiner, says he's not resigning? He might be changing that tune soon, because there are more pictures out there and they are way, worse. He doesn't know if any of the women who got those pictures were under-age or not. There might be women coming out of the woodwork from all over. This guy is so stupid. What a pervert.
  
  http://gawker.com/5809247/
  
  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … xpose.html
  
  reply report
2. 61
  Ralph Deedsposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Can I assume you're not an admirer of Newt Gingrich and that you've never viewed or forwarded anything pornographic on the Internet? Seems to me the media is overdoing the significance a bit. And, the biggest axxhole in the story is Breitbart. It will be interesting to see what his role in the affair actually was. I watched his performance at Wiener's press conference yesterday. He's the most obnoxious, evil person I've seen in a long time.
  reply report
  95
  habeeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  What Gingrich did is MUCH worse!
  reply report
  61
  Ralph Deedsposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Agreed. Gingrich is a truly evil man. Weiner was foolish but apparently not criminal or evil. Judging from emails I get from friends and from what I've read about the huge amount of porn traffic on the Internet most of us including myself aren't in a position to cast the first stone.
  reply report
  95
  habeeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  True, but I don't think viewing porn is as bad as sending pics of yourself to people - when you're married. I wouldn't be upset to find hubby viewing porn, but if he sent pics of himself to some woman, I might pull a Bobbitt!! lol
  
  I'm sorry and not trying to be mean, but why did he think women would want to view him?? I know that 99.9% of people on earth wouldn't want to see my unclothed bod, and I wouldn't want to see his, either. Heck, I just want to feed him and put some meat on those bones! No pun intended.
  reply report
  61
  Ralph Deedsposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  The answer might depend on their online conversation leading up to the emailed images. I doubt that Weiner just started off sending pics to random women out of the blue. There must have been some conversation leading up to the sending of the photo. The ladies conceivably gave some indication that they were receptive. Or they also may have sent him naughty pics. We don't know all the facts. I'm not condoning his behavior. I just don't think he should be crucified based on what we know now.
  reply report
  95
  habeeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I don't want to crucify him. I'm a lot more concerned about the last report on the economy. I think we all tend to get too bogged down in things like "weinergate" and "palingate." And I include myself in that. Seriously, we have a lot bigger problems than weiners. Pun intended. I do, however, feel bad for his wife.
  reply report
77
Evan G Rogersposted 6 years ago
OH MY GOD!! SOME DUDE SENT A PICTURE OF HIS JUNK IN UNDERWEAR TO SOME LADY!!!

WE'RE IN 4 WARS RIGHT NOW, WHO THE F*CK CARES?!
reply report
1. 60
  DannyMaioposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  would it not be a big deal if it was a conservative? Please... is not posting about this going to help the 4 wars? I actually thought it was 3? do you know something we don't?
  reply report
  96
  Akbokposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I believe it would be an equally big deal regardless of the wiener sender's political affiliation. Also, whereas not posting about this may not help us in any of our wars, it is focusing our resources in relatively less important matters. Instead of spending another 5 minutes writing about this topic, let's all write a letter to a soldier instead!
  reply report
  61
  KK Trainorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Actually you could not be more wrong. Research a little and you will see that Republicans in similar circumstances generally resign, while Democrats stay in office. It is a fact.
  
  And if you don't want to spend time on this topic, then why are you commenting?
  reply report
  67
  lovemychrisposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  REPUBLICANS have to resign, because they're always blustering about how perfect they are.
  How can they stay when they castrate others for the same?
  Dems don't do that.They know nobody's perfect.
  He said if the voters want me out--I'm out. What's the problem?
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Because he is a dirty Democrat.
  
  If it was Sarah Palin who did something like that they'd find a way to turn it around and make her the victim.
  reply report
  60
  Tom Koeckeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I wouldn't mind getting one from Sarah Palin, especially if it was a picture or, better yet, a video with no sound! She may be dumb, but she's also cute!
  reply report
  60
  DannyMaioposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  If they know nobody is perfect why do they call for their resignation?? hypocrites
  reply report
  96
  Akbokposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I said "another" 5 minutes silly, and I was talking about the level of offense, not the political consequences. If I get sent a picture of someone's junk I wouldn't care whether it belonged to a republican or a democrat. Time spent responding: 29 seconds.
  reply report
  77
  Evan G Rogersposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  let's see... Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, and Syria (we attacked them, and then their government took the blame for it).
  
  So it's actually 5. All undeclared.
  reply report
  60
  DannyMaioposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  We are not at war with Pakistan and Syria. so it is three.
  reply report
  77
  Evan G Rogersposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Here's part of the beginning of the war in Syria:
  http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JJ29Ak02.html
  
  And here's the report discussing how our military is hi-jacking their media in order to spread pro-US propaganda (we only know this because of Wikileaks):
  http://wlcentral.org/node/1257
  
  And here's numerous links talking about how we are at war with Pakistan:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpA6UUoqGdM
  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w … 036512.ece
  http://archive.slickdeals.net/showthread.php?t=913654
  
  ... so...
  
  Yeah, we're at war with Syria and Pakistan.
  reply report
  61
  Ralph Deedsposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Not to mention nearly 10% of the workforce unemployed and the economy about to go back into the tank before it even got out.
  reply report
76
Greek Oneposted 6 years ago
hold on a second.. his name is ACTUALLY Weiner?
reply report
1. 82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Yep, and boy are the one-liners flying around in my house right now, lol...
  reply report
2. 71
  Lisa HWposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  (See? That explains it all! How could anyone expect more of a guy with a name like that? )
  reply report
61
KK Trainorposted 6 years ago
Weiner is so gross I'm just glad I didn't see the photo. I agree that he should resign but I am pretty sure he won't because he's a democrat and they have no shame.
reply report
84
Mighty Momposted 6 years ago
Weiner showed incredibly poor judgment.
He has publicly apologized for his actions.
But says he will not resign.
IDK, seems comparable to me to the other NY congressman who sent the shirtless pic on the Internet.
Could there be yet another special election in New York's future???
reply report
87
Stacie Lposted 6 years ago
why do w men in power prey on women? why do powerful men do such stupid things?
Weiner, Schwarzenneggar, Kennedy,Clinton,and on and on....
reply report
1. 82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  
  It DOES take two to tango...if the women said no, there wouldn't have been a scandal, either, right?
  reply report
2. 77
  Evan G Rogersposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I love the idea that men in power "prey" on the women.
  
  No offense, but usually the chicks ain't protesting.
  
  We just hear about the ones that do.
  reply report
  59
  tony0724posted 6 years agoin reply to this
  And usually Gloria Allred is close by doing her best to get her share of the limelight.What I want to know is how is fellow Dem Charles Rangel still in office after he gave GE that sweetheart deal that allowed them to pay no taxes ?
  reply report
  77
  Evan G Rogersposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  what?
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  And here I was beginning to think that no one agreed with me...at least, I THINK you did, lol...
  reply report
83
Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago
Let's see:

Democrat sends inappropriate pictures over the Internet - poor judgement

Republicans dumps wife while she is in hospital for cancer treatments - Republican nominee for President

Did the governor who claimed he was "hiking the Appalachian trail" resign?
reply report
1. 67
  lovemychrisposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Oooooh--good point!
  
  And actually--they did have to resign once, because they were impeaching Clinton for the same thing they were doing!!
  reply report
2. 61
  KK Trainorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Sorry, which Republican are you talking about? I don't remember one with a cancer ridden wife. Who was that?
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Mark Sanford - I read up on it, he didn't step down, he was impeached
  
  Newt Gingrich
  reply report
  61
  KK Trainorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  No, which one was a Republican nominee for President? Is lovemychris talking about Edwards the Democrat? I'm confused...
  reply report
  61
  KK Trainorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I mean you, who was that?
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Newt Gingrich.......... Sorry if I confused you by listing them in the order I discussed them.
  reply report
  61
  KK Trainorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  well I was confused because I didn't realize Newt had been the nominee for President. He has run, but when was he our nominee?
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  He is currently running for the nomination, that's what I meant.
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  
  My first thought was John Edwards, but oops, he's a Democrat...
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Some men are pigs no matter what the party...
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  
  Exactly my point...and the women who agree to the affairs have their own nice name...
  reply report
3. 60
  DannyMaioposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Edwards was a democrat! get your story straight
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Edwards did not dump his wife while she was battling cancer...Newt Gingrich did. Not that Edwards was any better but he did stick around.
  reply report
  57
  Doug Hughesposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Schwartzneiger is a republican.
  
  BFD. Evan got this right. Who cares?
  reply report
  60
  DannyMaioposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Arnold is really a democrat! all his policies where democratic. he is extremely liberal and everyone knows it. look at his record.
  reply report
  83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  
  I guess Nixon was too...
  reply report
  67
  lovemychrisposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Well--that should make you happy, since you're a Democrat too!
  reply report
79
Chaotic Chicaposted 6 years ago
Just as a wee bit of a side note, CEO's and other big time business men & women have illicit affairs all too often {blatant or otherwise} and while people shake their heads they look at their success and shrug it off.
Politicians {notorious for failing the people regarding law making and enforcement} get caught with their pants down and everybody calls for their resignation. Not because of their poor ability to rule for the people but because they were "immoral".
Does anybody else see this as hypocritical or is it just me?
reply report
95
habeeposted 6 years ago
You guys know I'm no fan of Palin, but I am a fan of fair play, and I don't get this. NBC said they didn't have time to cover "Weinergate" because it wasn't important. Then they turned right around and covered Palin's Paul Revere stupidity. hmmm...can you say "hypocrite"??

Why is the press so fascinated by Palin? Maybe if they'd stop giving her so much attention, she'd go away...far, far away.
reply report
1. 83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  As far as I know, Weiner is not planning on running for president.
  
  I agree with you, I know what she says is entertaining but I'd rather they just ignore Palin.
  
  This whole argument is ridiculous...this has nothing to do with what party anyone belongs to. People are people and you find sleazy ones everywhere...
  
  I also agree that what they do in their private life is none of my business. If they commit a crime in office then I say they should step down. Sending pictures to women on the Internet is stupid and sleazy but it's not corruption.
  
  It's funny you say that liberals always try to deflect attention wbfree. Every single time anyone on this forum criticizes Palin or Bush or any other Republican, someone will bring up Bill Clinton or Carter or Obama. No one is exempt. Oh...and the links you provided are hardly to credible news sources.
  reply report
  95
  habeeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I don't take Palin seriously as a potential presidential candidate. Unfortunately, some do. I see her more as a sideshow.
  reply report
81
Onusonusposted 6 years ago
I knew he did it! what a loser.
reply report
1. 83
  Uninvited Writerposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Looser than what?
  reply report
  81
  Onusonusposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Better?
  reply report
59
BobbiRantposted 6 years ago
But somehow, Sarah Palin spending PAC donations for a fabulous vacation, via private bus no less, is okay?????????????? How is This?
reply report
1. 60
  Tom Koeckeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Seriously Bobbi, you think taking a bus on donated money, and sending porn pics to women who don't want them, are equally okay?
  reply report
2. 59
  tony0724posted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Or why is Charles Rangel giving a sweetheart deal to GE so they pay no taxes Bobbi ? Or why does a Kennedy not want a windfarm where he lives ? I thought he was supposed to be green.Or why does Nancy Pelosi give exemptions to this great new healthcare law to constituents in her district , huh ?
  reply report
3. 59
  tony0724posted 6 years agoin reply to this
  And to answer your question Bobbi. Weeniedog is currently in a position to vote on decisions that affect all of our lives. And he has proven not only to be a liar but irresponsible. Palin does not hold an office.
  reply report
61
Disturbiaposted 6 years ago
I have trouble keeping a straight face just thinking about this.

So what if Weiner likes to sext pics of his weiner over the internet. He should have just fessed up and admitted he's nothing more than a horndog. But with all the problems in the country these days, does anyone really care that he's sexting? A million other people are doing the exact same thing. The only reason anyone even gives a dang is because he's an obnoxious, loud mouth, and it probably feels really good to take him down a few notches.

The more serious issue here is his dishonesty in trying to cover it up. What else is he not up front about? The man just plain lied to everyone. Bad idea. How can anyone ever take this man seriously again, or trust anything he says?
reply report
1. 82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Boehner, when questioned, noted: "I always knew that Weiner was crooked"
  
  Obama..."No comment on how to handle Weiner problem."
  
  Pelosi vows to keep Weiner in!
  
  "Congress condoms Weiner"
  
  Weiner's wife commented: "He never was able to control himself... every time he sees a cute girl he just gets excited and tweets all over the place"
  
  Sorry, couldn't help myself.... No offense intended, of course...
  reply report
  79
  Chaotic Chicaposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  LMAO!!!! That's funny!
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Those were just a few of the one-liners that my husband and son were tossing out last night to each other...they just can't help themselves, lol...
  reply report
  61
  Disturbiaposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  LOL
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I had tears rolling down my face from laughing so hard, listening to those two last night. They are a handful, lol...
  reply report
  76
  Greek Oneposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  hold on a sec...
  
  a John named Boehner dueling with a Weiner?
  reply report
  82
  TamCorposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  lol...Which leads into another of my son's quips...
  
  I suppose that shoots down the distant vague possibility of a "Boehner vs. Weiner" presidential election in the future
  
  reply report
2. 71
  Lisa HWposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  I don't even really blame someone like that for lying about it (because - really - what a stupid thing for anyone to do). The thing that gets someone like that "points off" in my book is that they're in office. It doesn't take a "big genius" to figure out that sending pictures electronically isn't the most brilliant thing to do, and is likely to result in someone's at least telling one did it. And yet these clowns do this stupid stuff and then try to pretend they didn't.
  
  I mean, either do the stupid stuff and just own up; or else don't do stupid stuff and you won't have to worry about anyone finding anything out and making a laughing stock out of you (at best). So, to me, someone who can't or won't grasp that simple concept of either do what you want and own up, or don't do stupid stuff at all; is either too much of a little idiot to be having a say in office, or else is so much of narcissist he thinks he can do stupid stuff and that everyone else is too stupid not to be fooled by his lies.
  
  So, basically, I don't see it as being about what he did or even about his lying about it. It's about his showing a number of signs that he's yet one more clown who ought to resign (regardless of his party).
  reply report
76
Greek Oneposted 6 years ago
....even if he resigns, there would still be over 400 weiners in the House of Representatives

... Palin eager to devour Weiner in possible election contest

...wife was blindsided by Weiner

...tricky Dick had nothing on this Weiner

....When at his best, this Weiner is a Spitzer

....seems like Weiner was a congress man

...New York voters screwed by Weiner

...at his trial, Edwards to blame Weiner for giving him bad advice

...Weiner loses his funny bone in the midst of controversy

...Weiner cover up by Bush was never an option

....Congressmen try to put Weiner behind them

...Weiner rises up to occasion during news conference

..Weiner defense strategy... don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes

...once proud and rising Weiner now flaccid and shrinking in the face of public ridicule

...The question remains...Will voters find Weiner too hard to swallow now?
reply report
83
Uninvited Writerposted 6 years ago
reply report
1. 61
  Druid Dudeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Making the comments, pictures, whatever! That was stupid. Posting it to twitter, idiotic. Now, he'll be asked to or voluntarily resign, and then be asked to speak at this function or that graduation @150,000/ 200,000 dollars an engagement. Brilliant!
  reply report
  61
  Druid Dudeposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Actually, he and John Boehner ought to team up. Weiner and Boehner, attys at law. (I know it's pronounced BAYNER, but it's spelled BOEHNER)
  reply report
67
lovemychrisposted 6 years ago
"He's the most obnoxious, evil person I've seen in a long time."

Yeah--Fox sure knows how to pick 'em.
reply report
67
lovemychrisposted 6 years ago
aravosis:

"Tweet women, you should resign. Have a "wide stance" in the airport men's room, you get to finish your term."

lol. that one was funny. And I think he was set-up, just like Weiner.
reply report
65
I am DB Cooperposted 6 years ago
Like Eliot Spitzer, Weiner had thrown away just about any chance he had of climbing within the Democratic Party. They both appeared to be rising political stars, if only they could have avoided messing around with women they weren't married to.
reply report
1. 84
  Mighty Momposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Very true.
  In the Internet age it's a whole lot easier to get caught -- either people seeing you out or doing something stupid like Weiner because you don't really understand the power of the technology.
  The behavior is as old as man (and woman).
  But JKF was probably the last president who could get away with such indiscretions.
  
  But in the grand scheme of things, if my political representative has to screw around, I'd rather he did it with his own "weiner" than with taxpayer money!
  reply report
84
Mighty Momposted 6 years ago
In response to earlier post by Habee:
The timing of Weinergate overlapped with Palin's rewrite of Ameican History.
The comedians were having a field day with the weiner jokes and talking about what a good sport Rep. Weiner is.
Then the tone switched.
Palin's initiall gaffe was extended by her public announcement that she knows her American history and Revere DID warn the Britsh. And her apologists screaming to change Wikipedia to concur with her version (this I find REALLY SCARY).
Meantime, Weiner had his press conference.
It's still getting play. I'm watching NBC right now.
Weinergate is a top story. Nothing on Palin today.
reply report
1. 84
  Mighty Momposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Oops. Spoke too soon. After the break we will be hearing story about rewriting history.
  Details at 6 .
  reply report
  59
  tony0724posted 6 years agoin reply to this
  MM anything Sarah Palin does has no effect on yours and my daily lives. Weeniedog is an elected official , Palin is not. Weeniedog votes on bills that effect all Americans, Palin does not. And she has not even announced a candidacy for office. Weeniedog has proven and even admitted that he is a liar. Palin just makes verbal faux pas that end up with the cackling hens on " The View ". Bottom line Palin doesn't matter. Weeniedog does. Because he has proven himself to be a liar and without integrity. Big difference
  reply report
  61
  Ralph Deedsposted 6 years agoin reply to this
  Lying about an embarrassing sexual indiscretion is normal human behavior.
  reply report
  59
  tony0724posted 6 years agoin reply to this
  But we are supposed to hold congressmen to a higher standard. But I guess I should not be surprised since ,Pelosi, Rangel and Bawney Frank are still there. And Wasserman Schultz is no bargain either.
  
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/0 … 58216.html
  reply report