Weiner admits to sending photo

1. 61

   DannyMaioposted 9 years ago

   DEMOCRAT Anthony Weiner Admits to sending Photo's and other inappropriate behavior. Lets see all the far left who believed him and was sticking up for this fool come clean! Lets see how you far lefties spin this. The man is a dog and should resign! Could not have happened to a better big mouth a$$hole.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      wbfreeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I know. Isn't it something how liberals always make up excuses for their lying, corrupt politicians and bring up someone else to take attention off of their filthy selves? As if that excuses or lessens the evil they've done. Amazing.
      
      This jerk Weiner, says he's not resigning? He might be changing that tune soon, because there are more pictures out there and they are way, worse. He doesn't know if any of the women who got those pictures were under-age or not. There might be women coming out of the woodwork from all over. This guy is so stupid. What a pervert. 
      
      http://gawker.com/5809247/
      
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … xpose.html
      
      
      
      

      replyreport
   2. 73

      Ralph Deedsposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Can I assume you're not an admirer of Newt Gingrich and that you've never viewed or forwarded anything pornographic on the Internet? Seems to me the media is overdoing the significance a bit. And, the biggest axxhole in the story is Breitbart. It will be interesting to see what his role in the affair actually was. I watched his performance at Wiener's press conference yesterday. He's the most obnoxious, evil person I've seen in a long time.

      replyreport
      1. 92

         habeeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         What Gingrich did is MUCH worse!

         replyreport
         1. 73

            Ralph Deedsposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Agreed. Gingrich is a truly evil man. Weiner was foolish but apparently not criminal or evil. Judging from emails I get from friends and from what I've read about the huge amount of porn traffic on the Internet most of us including myself aren't in a position to cast the first stone.

            replyreport
            1. 92

               habeeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               True, but I don't think viewing porn is as bad as sending pics of yourself to people - when you're married. I wouldn't be upset to find hubby viewing porn, but if he sent pics of himself to some woman, I might pull a Bobbitt!! lol
               
               I'm sorry and not trying to be mean, but why did he think women would want to view him?? I know that 99.9% of people on earth wouldn't want to see my unclothed bod, and I wouldn't want to see his, either. Heck, I just want to feed him and put some meat on those bones! No pun intended.

               replyreport
               1. 73

                  Ralph Deedsposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  The answer might depend on their online conversation leading up to the emailed images. I doubt that Weiner just started off sending pics to random women out of the blue. There must have been some conversation leading up to the sending of the photo. The ladies conceivably gave some indication that they were receptive. Or they also may have sent him naughty pics. We don't know all the facts. I'm not condoning his behavior. I just don't think he should be crucified based on what we know now.

                  replyreport
                  1. 92

                     habeeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                     I don't want to crucify him. I'm a lot more concerned about the last report on the economy. I think we all tend to get too bogged down in things like "weinergate" and "palingate." And I include myself in that. Seriously, we have a lot bigger problems than weiners. Pun intended. I do, however, feel bad for his wife.

                     replyreport
2. 61

   Evan G Rogersposted 9 years ago

   OH MY GOD!! SOME DUDE SENT A PICTURE OF HIS JUNK IN UNDERWEAR TO SOME LADY!!!
   
   WE'RE IN 4 WARS RIGHT NOW, WHO THE F*CK CARES?!

   replyreport
   1. 61

      DannyMaioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      would it not be a big deal if it was a conservative? Please... is not posting about this going to help the 4 wars? I actually thought it was 3? do you know something we don't?

      replyreport
      1. 88

         Akbokposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         I believe it would be an equally big deal regardless of the wiener sender's political affiliation.  Also, whereas not posting about this may not help us in any of our wars, it is focusing our resources in relatively less important matters.  Instead of spending another 5 minutes writing about this topic, let's all write a letter to a soldier instead!

         replyreport
         1. 60

            KK Trainorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Actually you could not be more wrong. Research a little and you will see that Republicans in similar circumstances generally resign, while Democrats stay in office. It is a fact.
            
            And if you don't want to spend time on this topic, then why are you commenting?

            replyreport
            1. 68

               lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               REPUBLICANS have to resign, because they're always blustering about how perfect they are.
               How can they stay when they castrate others for the same?
               Dems don't do that.They know nobody's perfect.
               He said if the voters want me out--I'm out. What's the problem?

               replyreport
               1. 81

                  Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  Because he is a dirty Democrat.
                  
                  If it was Sarah Palin who did something like that they'd find a way to turn it around and make her the victim.

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     Tom Koeckeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                     I wouldn't mind getting one from Sarah Palin, especially if it was a picture or, better yet, a video with no sound! She may be dumb, but she's also cute!

                     replyreport
               2. 61

                  DannyMaioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  If they know nobody is perfect why do they call for their resignation?? hypocrites

                  replyreport
            2. 88

               Akbokposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               I said "another" 5 minutes silly, and I was talking about the level of offense, not the political consequences.  If I get sent a picture of someone's junk I wouldn't care whether it belonged to a republican or a democrat.  Time spent responding: 29 seconds.

               replyreport
      2. 61

         Evan G Rogersposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         let's see... Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, and Syria (we attacked them, and then their government took the blame for it).
         
         So it's actually 5. All undeclared.

         replyreport
         1. 61

            DannyMaioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            We are not at war with Pakistan and Syria. so it is three.

            replyreport
            1. 61

               Evan G Rogersposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               Here's part of the beginning of the war in Syria:
               http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JJ29Ak02.html
               
               And here's the report discussing how our military is hi-jacking their media in order to spread pro-US propaganda (we only know this because of Wikileaks):
               http://wlcentral.org/node/1257
               
               And here's numerous links talking about how we are at war with Pakistan:
               http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpA6UUoqGdM
               http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w … 036512.ece
               http://archive.slickdeals.net/showthread.php?t=913654
               
               
               ... so...
               
               Yeah, we're at war with Syria and Pakistan.

               replyreport
         2. 73

            Ralph Deedsposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Not to mention nearly 10% of the workforce unemployed and the economy about to go back into the tank before it even got out.

            replyreport
3. 71

   Greek Oneposted 9 years ago

   hold on a second.. his name is ACTUALLY Weiner?

   replyreport
   1. 81

      TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Yep, and boy are the one-liners flying around in my house right now, lol...

      replyreport
   2. 67

      Lisa HWposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            (See?  That explains it all!  How could anyone expect more of a guy with a name like that?  )

      replyreport
4. 60

   KK Trainorposted 9 years ago

   Weiner is so gross I'm just glad I didn't see the photo. I agree that he should resign but I am pretty sure he won't because he's a democrat and they have no shame.

   replyreport
5. 83

   Mighty Momposted 9 years ago

   Weiner showed incredibly poor judgment.
   He has publicly apologized for his actions.
   But says he will not resign.
   IDK, seems comparable to me to the other NY congressman who sent the shirtless pic on the Internet.
   Could there be yet another special election in New York's future???

   replyreport
6. 88

   Stacie Lposted 9 years ago

   why do w men in power prey on women? why do powerful men do such stupid things?
   Weiner, Schwarzenneggar, Kennedy,Clinton,and on and on....

   replyreport
   1. 81

      TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      
      
      It DOES take two to tango...if the women said no, there wouldn't have been a scandal, either, right?

      replyreport
   2. 61

      Evan G Rogersposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I love the idea that men in power "prey" on the women.
      
      No offense, but usually the chicks ain't protesting.
      
      We just hear about the ones that do.

      replyreport
      1. 60

         tony0724posted 9 years agoin reply to this

         And usually Gloria Allred is close by doing her best to get her share of the limelight.What I want to know is how is fellow Dem Charles Rangel still in office after he gave GE that sweetheart deal that allowed them to pay no taxes ?

         replyreport
         1. 61

            Evan G Rogersposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            what?

            replyreport
      2. 81

         TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         And here I was beginning to think that no one agreed with me...at least, I THINK you did, lol...

         replyreport
7. 81

   Uninvited Writerposted 9 years ago

   Let's see:
   
   Democrat sends inappropriate pictures over the Internet - poor judgement
   
   Republicans dumps wife while she is in hospital for cancer treatments - Republican nominee for President
   
   
   Did the governor who claimed he was "hiking the Appalachian trail" resign?

   replyreport
   1. 68

      lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Oooooh--good point!
      
      And actually--they did have to resign once, because they were impeaching Clinton for the same thing they were doing!!

      replyreport
   2. 60

      KK Trainorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Sorry, which Republican are you talking about? I don't remember one with a cancer ridden wife. Who was that?

      replyreport
      1. 81

         Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         Mark Sanford - I read up on it, he didn't step down, he was impeached
         
         Newt Gingrich

         replyreport
         1. 60

            KK Trainorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            No, which one was a Republican nominee for President? Is lovemychris talking about Edwards the Democrat? I'm confused...

            replyreport
         2. 60

            KK Trainorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            I mean you, who was that?

            replyreport
            1. 81

               Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               Newt Gingrich.......... Sorry if I confused you by listing them in the order I discussed them.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  KK Trainorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  well I was confused because I didn't realize Newt had been the nominee for President. He has run, but when was he our nominee?

                  replyreport
                  1. 81

                     Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                     He is currently running for the nomination, that's what I meant.

                     replyreport
      2. 81

         TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         
         
         My first thought was John Edwards, but oops, he's a Democrat...

         replyreport
         1. 81

            Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Some men are pigs no matter what the party...

            replyreport
            1. 81

               TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               
               
               Exactly my point...and the women who agree to the affairs have their own nice name...

               replyreport
   3. 61

      DannyMaioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Edwards was a democrat! get your story straight

      replyreport
      1. 81

         Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         Edwards did not dump his wife while she was battling cancer...Newt Gingrich did. Not that Edwards was any better but he did stick around.

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Doug Hughesposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Schwartzneiger is a republican.
            
            BFD.  Evan got this right. Who cares?

            replyreport
            1. 61

               DannyMaioposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               Arnold is really a democrat! all his policies where democratic. he is extremely liberal and everyone knows it. look at his record.

               replyreport
               1. 81

                  Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  
                  
                  I guess Nixon was too...

                  replyreport
               2. 68

                  lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

                  Well--that should make you happy, since you're a Democrat too!

                  replyreport
8. 61

   Chaotic Chicaposted 9 years ago

   Just as a wee bit of a side note, CEO's and other big time business men & women have illicit affairs all too often {blatant or otherwise} and while people shake their heads they look at their success and shrug it off.
   Politicians {notorious for failing the people regarding law making and enforcement} get caught with their pants down and everybody calls for their resignation.  Not because of their poor ability to rule for the people but because they were "immoral".
   Does anybody else see this as hypocritical or is it just me?

   replyreport
9. 92

   habeeposted 9 years ago

   You guys know I'm no fan of Palin, but I am a fan of fair play, and I don't get this. NBC said they didn't have time to cover "Weinergate" because it wasn't important. Then they turned right around and covered Palin's Paul Revere stupidity. hmmm...can you say "hypocrite"??
   
   Why is the press so fascinated by Palin? Maybe if they'd stop giving her so much attention, she'd go away...far, far away.

   replyreport
   1. 81

      Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      As far as I know, Weiner is not planning on running for president.
      
      I agree with you, I know what she says is entertaining but I'd rather they just ignore Palin.
      
      This whole argument is ridiculous...this has nothing to do with what party anyone belongs to. People are people and you find sleazy ones everywhere...
      
      I also agree that what they do in their private life is none of my business. If they commit a crime in office then I say they should step down. Sending pictures to women on the Internet is stupid and sleazy but it's not corruption.
      
      It's funny you say that liberals always try to deflect attention wbfree. Every single time anyone on this forum criticizes Palin or Bush or any other Republican, someone will bring up Bill Clinton or Carter or Obama. No one is exempt. Oh...and the links you provided are hardly to credible news sources.

      replyreport
      1. 92

         habeeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

         I don't take Palin seriously as a potential presidential candidate. Unfortunately, some do. I see her more as a sideshow.

         replyreport
10. 0

    Onusonusposted 9 years ago

    I knew he did it! what a loser.

    replyreport
    1. 81

       Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Looser than what?

       replyreport
       1. 0

          Onusonusposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          Better?

          replyreport
11. 60

    BobbiRantposted 9 years ago

    But somehow, Sarah Palin spending PAC donations for a fabulous vacation, via private bus no less, is okay??????????????  How is This?

    replyreport
    1. 61

       Tom Koeckeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Seriously Bobbi, you think taking a bus on donated money, and sending porn pics to women who don't want them, are equally okay?

       replyreport
    2. 60

       tony0724posted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Or why is Charles Rangel giving a sweetheart deal to GE so they pay no taxes Bobbi ? Or why does a Kennedy not want a windfarm where he lives ? I thought he was supposed to be green.Or why does Nancy Pelosi give exemptions to this great new healthcare law to constituents in her district , huh ?

       replyreport
    3. 60

       tony0724posted 9 years agoin reply to this

       And to answer your question Bobbi. Weeniedog is currently in a position to vote on decisions that affect all of our lives. And he has proven not only to be a liar but irresponsible. Palin does not hold an office.

       replyreport
12. 61

    Disturbiaposted 9 years ago

    I have trouble keeping a straight face just thinking about this.
    
    So what if Weiner likes to sext pics of his weiner over the internet. He should have just fessed up and admitted he's nothing more than a horndog. But with all the problems in the country these days, does anyone really care that he's sexting? A million other people are doing the exact same thing. The only reason anyone even gives a dang is because he's an obnoxious, loud mouth, and it probably feels really good to take him down a few notches.
    
    The more serious issue here is his dishonesty in trying to cover it up. What else is he not up front about? The man just plain lied to everyone. Bad idea. How can anyone ever take this man seriously again, or trust anything he says?

    replyreport
    1. 81

       TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Boehner, when questioned, noted: "I always knew that Weiner was crooked"
       
       
       Obama..."No comment on how to handle Weiner problem."
       
       
       Pelosi vows to keep Weiner in!
       
       
       
       "Congress condoms Weiner"
       
       
       Weiner's wife commented: "He never was able to control himself... every time he sees a cute girl he just gets excited and tweets all over the place"
       
       
       
       Sorry, couldn't help myself....   No offense intended, of course...

       replyreport
       1. 61

          Chaotic Chicaposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          LMAO!!!!  That's funny!

          replyreport
          1. 81

             TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

               Those were just a few of the one-liners that my husband and son were tossing out last night to each other...they just can't help themselves, lol...

             replyreport
       2. 61

          Disturbiaposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          LOL

          replyreport
          1. 81

             TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

             I had tears rolling down my face from laughing so hard, listening to those two last night. They are a handful, lol...

             replyreport
       3. 71

          Greek Oneposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          hold on a sec...
          
          a John named Boehner dueling with a Weiner?

          replyreport
          1. 81

             TamCorposted 9 years agoin reply to this

             lol...Which leads into another of my son's quips...
             
             I suppose that shoots down the distant vague possibility of a "Boehner vs. Weiner" presidential election in the future
             
             

             replyreport
    2. 67

       Lisa HWposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       I don't even really blame someone like that for lying about it (because - really - what a stupid thing for anyone to do).  The thing that gets someone like that "points off" in my book is that they're in office.  It doesn't take a "big genius" to figure out that sending pictures electronically isn't the most brilliant thing to do, and is likely to result in someone's at least telling one did it.  And yet these clowns do this stupid stuff and then try to pretend they didn't. 
       
       I mean, either do the stupid stuff and just own up; or else don't do stupid stuff and you won't have to worry about anyone finding anything out and making a laughing stock out of you (at best).  So, to me, someone who can't or won't grasp that simple concept of either do what you want and own up, or don't do stupid stuff at all; is either too much of a little idiot to be having a say in office, or else is so much of narcissist he thinks he can do stupid stuff and that everyone else is too stupid not to be fooled by his lies. 
       
       So, basically, I don't see it as being about what he did or even about his lying about it.  It's about his showing a number of signs that he's yet one more clown who ought to resign (regardless of his party).

       replyreport
13. 71

    Greek Oneposted 9 years ago

    ....even if he resigns, there would still be over 400 weiners in the House of Representatives
    
    ... Palin eager to devour Weiner in possible election contest
    
    ...wife was blindsided by Weiner
    
    ...tricky Dick had nothing on this Weiner
    
    ....When at his best, this Weiner is a Spitzer
    
    ....seems like Weiner was a congress man
    
    ...New York voters screwed by Weiner
    
    ...at his trial, Edwards to blame Weiner for giving him bad advice
    
    ...Weiner loses his funny bone in the midst of controversy
    
    ...Weiner cover up by Bush was never an option
    
    ....Congressmen try to put Weiner behind them
    
    ...Weiner rises up to occasion during news conference
    
    ..Weiner defense strategy... don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes
    
    ...once proud and rising Weiner now flaccid and shrinking in the face of public ridicule
    
    ...The question remains...Will voters find Weiner too hard to swallow now?

    replyreport
14. 81

    Uninvited Writerposted 9 years ago

    

    replyreport
    1. 60

       Druid Dudeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Making the comments, pictures, whatever! That was stupid. Posting it to twitter, idiotic. Now, he'll be asked to or voluntarily resign, and then be asked to speak at this function or that graduation @150,000/ 200,000 dollars an engagement. Brilliant!

       replyreport
       1. 60

          Druid Dudeposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          Actually, he and John Boehner ought to team up. Weiner and Boehner, attys at law. (I know it's pronounced BAYNER, but it's spelled BOEHNER)

          replyreport
15. 68

    lovemychrisposted 9 years ago

    "He's the most obnoxious, evil person I've seen in a long time."
    
    Yeah--Fox sure knows how to pick 'em.

    replyreport
16. 68

    lovemychrisposted 9 years ago

    aravosis: 
    
    "Tweet women, you should resign. Have a "wide stance" in the airport men's room, you get to finish your term."
    
    lol. that one was funny. And I think he was set-up, just like Weiner.

    replyreport
17. 71

    I am DB Cooperposted 9 years ago

    Like Eliot Spitzer, Weiner had thrown away just about any chance he had of climbing within the Democratic Party. They both appeared to be rising political stars, if only they could have avoided messing around with women they weren't married to.

    replyreport
    1. 83

       Mighty Momposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Very true.
       In the Internet age it's a whole lot easier to get caught -- either people seeing you out or doing something stupid like Weiner because you don't really understand the power of the technology.
       The behavior is as old as man (and woman).
       But JKF was probably the last president who could get away with such indiscretions.
       
       
       But in the grand scheme of things, if my political representative has to screw around, I'd rather he did it with his own "weiner" than with taxpayer money!

       replyreport
18. 83

    Mighty Momposted 9 years ago

    In response to earlier post by Habee:
    The timing of Weinergate overlapped with Palin's rewrite of Ameican History.
    The comedians were having a field day with the weiner jokes and talking about what a good sport Rep. Weiner is.
    Then the tone switched.
    Palin's initiall gaffe was extended by her public announcement that she knows her American history and Revere DID warn the Britsh. And her apologists screaming to change Wikipedia to concur with her version (this I find REALLY SCARY).
    Meantime, Weiner had his press conference.
    It's still getting play. I'm watching NBC right now.
    Weinergate is a top story. Nothing on Palin today.

    replyreport
    1. 83

       Mighty Momposted 9 years agoin reply to this

       Oops. Spoke too soon. After the break we will be hearing story about rewriting history.
       Details at 6 .

       replyreport
       1. 60

          tony0724posted 9 years agoin reply to this

          MM anything Sarah Palin does has no effect on yours and my daily lives. Weeniedog is an elected official , Palin is not. Weeniedog votes on bills that effect all Americans, Palin does not. And she has not even announced a candidacy for office. Weeniedog has proven and even admitted that he is a liar. Palin just makes verbal faux pas that end up with the cackling hens on " The View ". Bottom line Palin doesn't matter. Weeniedog does. Because he has proven himself to be a liar and without integrity. Big difference

          replyreport
          1. 73

             Ralph Deedsposted 9 years agoin reply to this

             Lying about an embarrassing sexual indiscretion is normal human behavior.

             replyreport
             1. 60

                tony0724posted 9 years agoin reply to this

                But we are supposed to hold congressmen to a higher standard. But I guess I should not be surprised since ,Pelosi, Rangel and Bawney Frank are still there. And Wasserman Schultz is no bargain either.
                
                http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/0 … 58216.html

                replyreport