What do you think of 1 Timothy 2:12? (NIV)

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (39 posts)
  1. dashingscorpio profile image88
    dashingscorpioposted 3 years ago

    What do you think of 1 Timothy 2:12? (NIV)

    "I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man;[a] she must be quiet."
    Do you find any parts of the bible to be sexist? or Do you believe God has his reasons?

    https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/12194076_f260.jpg

  2. Sri T profile image80
    Sri Tposted 3 years ago

    The bible was written by men. Need I say more? Man always wants the edge over others. In this case, he uses religion or his interpretation of what "God" wants. Women are equal but they have been conditioned by words and violence since ancient times to see themselves as not equal or greater than men. Some women do break free of it.

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Very true! The Bible contains a variety of 66 books written by approximately 45 different writers over a span of about 1200 years. All written by (men). Clearly this had some bearing on how most women were portrayed.

    2. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Of course, the bible was written by men.  Men who reflected the particular prejudices of the day, no more no less. No reasonable person believes that the bible was written by God. God is beyond all artificial boundaries, H/She .....is UNLIMITED.

  3. FatFreddysCat profile image97
    FatFreddysCatposted 3 years ago

    If I told my wife to shut up because the Bible sez she "must be quiet," she'd kick me square in the nuts. Haha

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      FatFreddysCat, There's also Proverbs 21:19 (NIV)
      "Better to live in a desert than with a quarrelsome and nagging wife." LOL!

    2. FatFreddysCat profile image97
      FatFreddysCatposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Does it say "thou shalt not kick thy hubby in the stones" anywhere?

    3. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      No, but there's Ephesians 5:22
      "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord." Some husbands may be into having their "stones" kicked now and then! smile

    4. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, the bible has so many sexist passages, especially the one by St. Paul.  I argued this w/my mother decades ago.  She BELIEVES in the bible, I stated that I DIDN'T because it was sexist. I am against any form of religion for this reason.

  4. Karen Exelby profile image80
    Karen Exelbyposted 3 years ago

    There is a historical reason behind this verse. In the early church women sat on one side of the church and men on the other. Women would shout questions across the church to their husbands and disrupt the teaching. When taken in context with the preceding verse "A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet." 1 Tim 2:11 the meaning becomes clearer. Looking at Heb 5:12 "For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat." it becomes even clearer. Those who are not educated enough  to teach should be quiet and listen. In this case, the women were not educated and not seeking instruction from the teacher, but from their husbands who were in need of instruction themselves,
    The Bible does not discriminate against women. Deborah was a judge who ruled Israel, Esther delivered her people, Ruth, along with many others including Rahab, the Harlot, are in the lineage of Christ. The Proverbs 31 woman was a business woman.
    Misogynistic males try to slant Biblical passages to suppress women, God does dot suppress women .

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      In most religions (women were not allowed to be educated). The vast majority of women are regulated as helpmates, mothers, or harlots. You'd never hear of a queen with 700 husbands and 300 boy toys via King Solomon. Women are better off today.

    2. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      God is all encompassing. H/She is beyond gender boundaries.  Gender boundaries & roles are man-made constructs made to subjugate women.

    3. wba108@yahoo.com profile image79
      wba108@yahoo.composted 3 years agoin reply to this

      There were female prophets in the New Testament, the four daughters of Phillip in Acts 21. I agree with you, Paul was simply addressing a specific issue in a church.

    4. Perspycacious profile image79
      Perspycaciousposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      This is strange coming as it does at a time when there were women who were regarded as prophetic.  How would one know unless they spoke?

  5. Say Yes To Life profile image80
    Say Yes To Lifeposted 3 years ago

    That's their particular take on it.  Other religions have other opinions.  Anyone who doesn't like this is free to follow another religion.

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Or (follow) no religion at all. smile

    2. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you, Mr. Dashing.  Religion is a man-made construct anyway, instituted to suit the particular POWERS THAT BE at that particular time.

  6. profile image0
    AC-DCposted 3 years ago

    This verse, along with other verses around this certain verse means that a woman should have no authority over a church. Women are not to be pastors, reverends, preachers, etc. Saying this, a woman can be very active in church. They just cannot be the head of a church. This is what the Bible says. NOT ME.

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Even today the Roman Catholic Church does not allow a woman to become a Priest or a Pope. It's kind of an outdated sexist rule. The CEO of General Motors is a woman. The next U.S. president may in fact be a woman.

    2. Rich kelley profile image62
      Rich kelleyposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      In the kingdom of God there will be no CEO, Us President male or female. Comparing the world with the kingdom of God goes crossways with the teachings of Christ. We are to be In the world not of it. A submissive servant is the example not the world.

    3. celafoe profile image59
      celafoeposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Amen Rich,   at least they now have one correct answer

    4. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Of course it is OUTDATED.  The Roman Catholic Church is one of the most misogynic religions around.  It is against any form of women's control of her destiny as evidence in its prohibitions against contraception & abortion.

    5. profile image0
      AC-DCposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Celafoe..... so I am wrong in my interpretation of this verse? Please elaborate.

    6. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Rich Kelley, The bible says "On earth as it is in heaven" which implies we should following the same rules. I was not comparing locales but rather the treatment of individuals. "Love thy neighbor as thy self". That's the ultimate in equality.

    7. PlanksandNails profile image86
      PlanksandNailsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      All authority has been given to Jesus Christ as Head of the Body. No man, or woman. The hirelings called pastors, reverends and teachers have made themselves kings and lords in their man-made church system, but in the Kingdom they are non-existent.

    8. Susan Guinn profile image74
      Susan Guinnposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      gmwilliams  ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God & is profitable for doctrine, for reproof,for correction & for correction in Holiness. IITim 3:16 God created mankind in HIS own image, the image of God HE created them Male & femal

  7. gmwilliams profile image86
    gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago

    https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/12198724_f260.jpg

    The bible was written by men.  This precept is based upon the gender relationships and roles in the historical context of that particular time.  In many ancient cultures, women were seen as subordinate & inferior to men.  However, the more conservative, dogmatic, traditionalist, & fundamentalist religionist still believe that women are lesser than men, basing their contention on the bible.   

    Yes, the bible contains many passages inferring to the lesser status of women.  To reiterate, it was written by men who viewed women as somehow blemished, even inferior.   Now, I am digressing.  The more conservative, traditional, & fundamentalist faction of Christian religions still believe that women should be submissive to male authority.  Some factions of the Southern Baptist religion assert this premise. 

    The Roman Catholic religion still have prohibitions against women in more authoritative positions such as priests.  It even have strict prohibitions against women being in control of their reproductive destiny i.e. contraception & abortion.  It premise is that women should defer to men because the latter is preordained to be leaders while women are preordained to obey.........& serve.  There are some Christian religions who view women's more dominant roles in society as an affront to women's more traditional roles as wife and mother. 

    It is no mistake that the Roman Catholic Church holds Mary as the model for womanhood.  To the church, she was unobtrusive, subliming her needs to the male figures in her life.   In the more conservative Christian religions, girls are inculcated to sublimate their own needs, placing them last & that males are more important than they are.

    1. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I didn't think it was a coincidence that there were no female prophets! smile
      Anyone who studies the history of how the bible was actually "put together" during the canonization process isn't likely to assume it's all "factual".

    2. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Of course it isn't.  The church fathers wanted the bible to conform to their particular religious mantra. Points that were considered contradictory to their particular prospectus were intentionally left out. All aware people know this.

    3. Sri T profile image80
      Sri Tposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I don't know about all this mess.Yall better dust yalls bibles off and get in line with the word! lol

    4. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Sri T, I'd be shocked if you even own a bible! LOL!

    5. techygran profile image91
      techygranposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      There are indeed female prophets in the Bible--
      Old Testament:
      Miriam
      Deborah
      Huldah
      Noadiah
      Isaiah's wife

      New Testament:
      Anna
      The Daughters of Philip

  8. Susan Guinn profile image74
    Susan Guinnposted 3 years ago

    God had a perfect plan in the creation of man and women. It is not fair taking a verse out of conext, you have to view books & chapters as a whole. Paul said, For the man is not of the woman, nor the woman of the man. For neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man” (1 Corinthians 11:8, 9). Women were created as a helpmate. Galatians 3:28 is certainly in harmony with 1 Peter 3:7 which makes it clear that women are “joint-heirs of the grace of life.  Having said that women, being the wife & mother in the home, she is to manage the household affairs. And he is the head of the wife and she is to be willingly in subjection (harmony)  to him (Ephesians 5:22, 23). Now, he should lovingly allow her the freedom to exercise authority in the management of domestic matters, as God has ordained it.  Now, absolutely yes would be my answer... women may teach (Titus 2:3); and they may, in certain ways, even teach men. Teaching in singing,(Colossians 3:16), and privately, in conjunction with her husband. Priscilla was involved in teaching Apollos (Acts 18:26). But a woman may not assume the position of teacher, with the man subordinated to the role of student, without violating a New Testament command. With above scripture, Men should play the vital role in the church however, women lead in many other areas...Prayer,hospitality, teaching in harmony,good works and deeds, raising Godly children, pleasing wife...Let us rise up and call her Blessed!
    Romans 16:1-21.Phoebe was a church official (deacon); Junia (KJV), a woman, was an apostle and thus certainly occupied a place of authority in the primitive church (Romans 16:7).4.Deborah was a prophetess of  Ephraim, she publicly proclaimed God’s message to the children of Israel. (Judges 4:5)  In Philippians 4:2-3, Paul comments that Euodia and Syntyche labored with him in the gospel. To name a few...Sarah, Rebekah, Leah, Rachel, Miriam, Deborah, Abigail, Ruth, Esther and many more.  So woman have played a vital part in spreading the gospel. Women are vital in God's work.  Oh yes and about the forbidden sin...Eve believed Satan's Lie, and Adam sinned due to his weakness...no blaming here!

    1. techygran profile image91
      techygranposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      and please don't overlook the weathy woman, Lydia, who is said to have had the first Christian church in her home in Thyratira... and other wealthy women, such as Joanna, who looked after the disciples' material needs, actually described as "apostles

  9. PlanksandNails profile image86
    PlanksandNailsposted 3 years ago

    This verse cannot be isolated on its own, but must be interpreted from the surrounding verses in context. The words in Paul's letter in this chapter is about correcting inappropriate behaviors, first for the men, and then on the women because there was a lot of anger and dispute that was hindering the teaching of the Gospel. In this particular verse you quoted, Paul addresses particular women about domineering, seizing authority and possibly wearing sensual attire that they were doing it in that instance. Paul's words were a disciplinary action towards men and then women at Ephesus.

    The only on who has ruling authority in the Body of Christ is Jesus. We are all equal as brothers and sisters among the Ekklesia. It is only those in the false Church system that have hired men who domineer and rule over their pew minions for personal gain and take this particular verse out of context as a means to muzzle woman.

    Paul draws a correlation by referring to Eve being deceived by false teaching and this was a reminder to the Ekklesia of the effects of deception.

    The fact is that this verse can apply to men too as it is about keeping a peaceful and non-distracting environment for the purpose of teaching the principles of the Gospel.

  10. Tusitala Tom profile image65
    Tusitala Tomposted 3 years ago

    It certainly sounds very sexist to me.  My version of the Bible says: "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over a man, but to be in silence."   Who wrote this? I wonder.   Obviously someone who feared that a woman or women would make him feel inferior.   That quote certainly shows it here.

    It's hard to believe that sane person of common sense would adopt such a stance but many do - especially in the Middle East - though it's not restricted to that area of the world.   

    I think such writings do a great deal of harm, if only because the people who read them don't have enough intelligence to understand that these are the writings of other men and not some divine being.

    1. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Give this man a 100 for this spot on answer! 100!

    2. dashingscorpio profile image88
      dashingscorpioposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      "the people who read them don't have enough intelligence to understand that (these are the writings of other men) and not some divine being." - Very true!

    3. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      The bible was meant as a metaphor.  It is a book of  history and stories.  It was not meant to be taken literally.  However, that issue is totally amiss w/some people!

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)