As a musician and music lover, I have grappled with an answer to this question since MJ's sad passing, if there ever will be one.
To me, good music entertains us. But great music must inspire and fuel passion within us. It may even change the way we view the world and hopefully for the better.
For Elvis fans, I have not forgotten The King either.
I'd have to say given the choice the Beatles are better. Jackson really only had one big album, Thriller and hadn't done much since that release, plus the Beatles have been around a lot longer.
I like their voices better, and their music was more complex. plus they didn't dance.
WOW, that's like: what's better, the Les Paul or the Strat?
Ok, I'll throw a curve: was watching Creole King (an Elvis flick--one of his self-favorites) the other day and saw where MJ--and Prince--got 'mad' moves from 'the King'.
To me, Robert Johnson, Bo Diddley, Muddy Waters, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Ike Turner, Elvis (and perhaps Jerry Lee Lewis) were all KINGS of R+R. MJ just didn't have the manliness those guys had. And to me, any King of Rock, including Run-DMC--LOL--has to be manly...no ''yee-hees'' allowed.
As for the Fab Four (Beatles), I simply don't count them on the same level as the aforementioned persons...They were--to me--the Kings of Rock's 2nd Wave, which was the Brit Invasion (which hasn't ended, btw).
JMHO (just my humble opinion)
It has to be the Beatles for the extraordinary diversity of their output. The Beatles pushed themselves to change and grow, to experiment, to explore. They did soft ballads (Michelle, Blackbird), hard rockers (Helter-Skelter, I Want You), sound experiments (Revolution 9), and Tin Pan Alley (Honey Pie). They experimented with chord dissonance (Strawberry Field) and Eastern sounds (Norwegian Wood).
Michael Jackson was great, extraordinary, and highly influential but he cannot approach this level of complexity and variety.
The Beatles. As good as MJ was, he was, in my opinion, a child molester.
Easily The Beatles. Michael Jackson was gigantically talented, but he took a musical art form (Soul, specifically Motown style Soul) and advanced it further and performed remarkably well - but The Beatles made Beatle music. They did songs that simply weren't reasonable songs for the radio of rock & roll fans to count as Pop or Rock music, had anyone else put some of their songs out they would have been laughed at - but The Beatles were so huge and so hugely influential, that whatever they did became an acceptable from or style of Pop/Rock music . . . it was now ok to listen and perform songs like 'that' because The Beatles did it. They changed the course of music in a way Jackson, and nobody else but Benny Goodman, Bing Crosby, Elvis, and Sam Cooke did.
Both of them are great. But for me, Michael Jackson is the greater one, because he grow to be the great one in my era. I also like some songs of the Beatles like "yesterday, Michele, mother", but there are many more songs sung by Michael Jackson that I like better --- like Ben, Black and white, Thriller, Billy Jean, earth song, and many more.
JUST between those 2, The Beatles. Now if I had to say as a general opinion, I'd say neither.
For me this is like comparing pears and apples.
Both acts were great. Both rightfully deserved their places in music history, by taking their music where noone dared to before them. Both made music that will be remembered for years and years to come.
But at the same time, MJ was a true pop artist. Beatles were a pop-rock band.
Eras when they created were different, so were the styles their nurtured.
With all that, I can not truly say who was greater. Both? None?
No conclusion from my side.
I have a hub about MJ, I respect his genius. But my all-time love will be the Beatles. I'm in my mid-30s, was born after their heyday, discovered them during my high school years, and was - is - hooked!
Will check out your MJ hub. I grew up in the 70s but never quite related to The Beatles.
I was more of a Carpenters fan (don't you dare laugh!) and only caught on with MJ's music from his Thriller album in the early 80s as a teenager.
I have since discovered how great Off The Wall among hit other hits! I was a late bloomer!
Got to be The Beatles. And I would guess that even worldwide The Beatles are much more popular as proven by Wikipedia statistics.
So far in 2009 on Wikipedia The Beatles is the second most popular page (on average of 111,896 views a day), with MJ's page being only 3rd (an average of 79,734 views per day in 2009), despite the fact that there was the death which would be expected to increase traffic.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/w … -2008.html
"Proven" ??? "Wikipedia "??? You joking?
Facebook is the biggest social networking site in the world at present, yea!?! Well ....Beatles have approx. 40 million Likes ...Michael Jackson? ....MJ has 70+ million Likes.
As I've said before...Michael Jackson was - is TRULY *Global*!!
IMO the Beatles changed the world more than anyone else in this category, Elvis made us rock early on, but then he was drafted and came back to make those silly movies. He luckily rebooted himself and became King in his own right.
In my opinion both affected two different generations and most music lovers respect, and enjoy both for uniqueness and entertainment value.
Im glad I dont have to choose, I love both styles
Greater in terms of what? Sales, number of fans, influence, originality, albums, singles, top 10 records, songs recorded, albums recorded, uses of the phrase cha mon!? Be more specific.
The Beatles. Michael entertained. The Beatles sparked a cultural revolution.
The Beatles are the greater of the two . Michael Jackson was talented and I did enjoy a few of his songs, but who can beat Abby Road. One thing I do admire about Jackson though is he enjoyed listening to the Moody Blues, who I will always like more than the Beatles .
Never much cared for either of 'em. Now, Johnny Cash vs. Waylon Jennings....
The Beatles are greater, both in scope of influence and scope of contribution.
Yet it may be a little slanted to compare them broadly; there were 4 of them but only 1 of him.
Hands down the Beatles. Jackson Perfected his talent/art above & beyond others in his genre. The Beatles plowed through to create their own.
Britney Spears. YAY! haha.. oh wait, The Beatles. Final answer.
Absolutely, without a doubt...The Beatles!!! The greatest, most influential band of all time.
I'm going to have to say....The Beatles. Oh and Disney is going to do a remake of The Yellow Submarine and it'll be 3D just so ya know
Michael Jackson for me. Never could understand how people like the Beatles. My favorite from that era was The Beach Boys.
Who's greater, The Beatles or Michael Jackson??
I don't care if its not a choice!
I'm a Rebel!
I'm going with Michael Jackson since I grew up with his music.
Knowing what a big fan Michael Jackson was, I bet he would say the Beatles were greater.
Off topic but one singer that a lot of people liked and I couldn't believe they would like was Bob Dylan. What's the appeal? People have said he's very poetic and profound, but I couldn't get past the voice.
Two word for you Michael Jackson.
His music not only made the world dance, but it changed the world. One person at a time. I know it changed my life.
Considering 10 Categories By Way Of Comparison, I'd say;
POPULARITY--BEATLES, WITH MJ NOT VERY FAR BEHIND
NUMBER OF INNOVATIONS---BEATLES
DEPTH OF INNOVATIONS---BEATLES
SCOPE OF INNOVATIONS---BEATLES
Of course, another way to look at it is---both did great work.
there were four Beatles and only one Michael Jackson - that is true. but The Beatles' music was four guys writing, singing, and playing the drums and the guitar. they didn't have an army of mixers, technicians, well connected handlers (Quincy Jones, Smokey Robinson, etc.), publicists (when John Lennon made the gaffe - "we are bigger than Jesus", he handled it himself with a short statement), dancers, lyricists and costume designers...
this is interesting as both were icons in different eras...my vote goes to the Beatles
Unless you went through "Beatlemania" you cannot imagine the impact and influence they had on music and society. I've never witnessed anything like it since. Their lyrics and music was so different than anything before. As a musician myself, I am still enthralled with many of the songs they wrote and performed. No two songs are alike, rare for a successful group, then and now.
Just listen to Norwegian Wood and you will know there is no comparison. Hey Jude, Mother Mary......need I say more?
I think that whichever decade you grew up in will determine a person's vote here. I grew up in the 80's so I was influenced more by HJ than the Beatles, but my Mom is a big fan of the Beatles and not MJ. Different eras, different influences. Both great musical icons however!
The beatles, however ther eis no dount that michael jackson also gave a great many contributions to the world of music!
Michael might have contributed to the music world but I am not too sure that any child who was molested would listen to him.
I'll go the Beatles on this one.
Okay, I'll give you that! I am not a fan of the man himself....just the music!
Gonna have to say The Beatles. I liked one or two of MJ's songs, but he was never exactly my cup of tea.
Being a musician I was influenced by both, and I like them both.
In the end Michael Jackson was the greatest entertainer of all time.
Easy. Michael Jackson as I only like one of his songs and none of the Beatles.
I've grown up listening to MJ's songs and I'm quite fascinated by it and stirred a deep yearning to make our world a better place even in my own little way. lol anyway,i love his moves!
I've also heard songs from The Beatles but i have to admit it didn't quite catch my interest.
MJ did great songs, but they couldn't touch the Beatles! Their songs are largely dated now, but I'm sure if John Lennon was still alive he'd still be writing those great songs. All the Beatles were singer/songwriters - with maybe the exception of Ringo Starr? Or did he write any?
What did Michael Jackson write?
Many of the hits like 'Billie Jean,Heal the world,Earth song,Man in the mirror,Bad ' to name a few.
.....and who was it that bought the rights to who's songs?
Michael Jackson the king of pop wrote at least 181 songs dumb ass. Here is a list of some of them.
Scream, Beat it, another part of me, black or white, jam, can you feel it, remember the time, heal the world, the way you make me feel, liberian girl, dangerous, shake your body (down to the ground), i just can't stop loving you, in the closet, we are the world, smooth criminal, stranger in moscow, say say say, wanna be starting somethin, will you be there, give into me, the girl is mine, can you feel it, break of dawn, you rock my world. billie jeane, dirty diana, bad, lovely one, leave me alone and state of shock to name a few. The list goes on and on. Educate yourself before you post bullshit.
In regard to the Beatles or Michael Jackson, both are top of the line artists for their time. I enjoy both and couldn't possibly choose one over the other.
I'm not sure who I discovered first...Michael Jackson as a little man within the Jackson 5 or the Beatles after hearing Paul McCartney and Wings for the first time. It seemed as if I heard something else by the Beatles (something I hadn't heard before) every year, and at the same time Michael Jackson was always heard on the radio with something new.
The Beatles artistry lies within their songwriting and their mastery of performance. Michael Jackson's artistry was evidenced throughout his life by way of pure talent in singing, dancing, songwriting, image make-overs, and visionary videos.
Which do I listen to the most? It depends on what mood I'm in.
In this part of the world, the Beetles don't make much sense. But if am to go with this thread, I think both played their part and both still move us in our different ways. Michael, was a genius.
Hand down by the books the Beetles over everyone
Best 100 Musicians
Greatest Artists of All Time
Greater entertainer than MJ
I love Both
“Greatest Artists of All Time “ ???
You mean *Group*, don’t you? We are talking a group and one entity – different dynamics altogether!
"Greater *entertainer* than MJ" ???
“entertainer” or entertainer(S)? Again…we are talking a group and one entity – Apples and an Orange! Or, Oranges and an Apple!
Here is the more realistic way of putting it:
Now...Take all the Beatles as a *Solo* (just as MJ was) "entertainer"....(I LOVE Paul with Wings / solo and 2-3 Lennon songs)....However...Not ONE of the Beatles as SOLO artists has had the *Global* impact / influence that Michael had. You can’t dispute that fact!
There lies the answer!
The none of the Beatles were millionaire until they Brock up and went solo.
A strong group compared to a solo one, more often wins, plus three of the solo artist of the Beatles lived to a longer life span.
When we look at the whole body of work and world wide positive influences , Beatles wins.
Personally I don't believe that story, yet no doubt few entertainers are stranger than Jackson. The guy miss out on this own childhood.
Do believe the Pope molested some, they were just better at covering it up. All those massive strange secretes and BS to protect along with much greater money to protect themselves with.
by Stevennix2001 12 years ago
Since, Michael Jackson newest documentary is out about the late great artists departure. I became quite curious to see how the world feels about his legacy. Therefore, I'm launching this post to get feedback on your thoughts of Michael Jackson. Do you guys feel he was just a...
by cooldad 4 years ago
My opinion is that Michael Jackson was a kid toucher, bottom line. I loved Jackson's music when I was a kid, but when he started bleaching his skin and wearing shin guards, I realized something wasn't quite right with him. ADULTS SHOULD NOT SLEEP IN THE SAME BED WITH LITTLE CHILDREN.Am...
by Victoria Lynn 9 years ago
What's the best music to do housework to? Michael Jackson is one of mine!
by Info Bucket 11 years ago
er there is a thread about him, but i am happy to contribute to another....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPjfMSn4f6clets post our fave's here is one of mine
by footynut 12 years ago
My personal favourite Michael Jackson song is Dirty Diana. What is yours?
by mosaicman 10 years ago
I think "Man In The Mirror" represents Mike best. He was about everything good. He wanted people to change their thinking and behaviors. This would change how people treat each other and the environment.
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|