How can Hillary be "for" women when her husband is a womanizer who's lied throug
How can Hillary be "for" women when her husband is a womanizer who's lied throughout their marriage?
I find it odd, that so many women are for Hillary Clinton, when her husband is accused of being a rapist and of having numerous affairs.
Hillary always says the accuser is lying, though Bill, under oath, has admitted to numerous affairs. (11 to 18 women have accused Bill, depending on which article you read.)
If she's an enabler for Bill's sexual lust, and denies the right of the abused women, how can she be "for" women, when she never blames Bill for his actions?
Just seems like a double standard.
Just because a wife and mother decides to stay married to a cheating husband doesn't mean she doesn't support equal pay for women, pro-choice, family leave, Planned Parenthood, and a host of other women issues.
Lots of people have entered into marriages swearing that cheating was a "deal breaker". However there is often a difference between the hypothetical and life.
Hillary is one of the few betrayed wives who doesn't seem to garner any sympathy for having a husband who cheated on her.
Most people (usually) attack the mistresses or groupies when a famous married man has women willing to have sex with him. It's not as if these women didn't know Bill was married.
They didn't care.
Hillary wouldn't be the first "strong minded" career woman who was "in love" with a man who routinely cheated on her. That's an issue between (them).
No one has attacked any of the Kennedy women for staying married to their husbands, Martin Luther King's wife for staying married to him, president's Johnson's wife, Franklin Roosevelt's wife, Thomas Jefferson's wife for having children with slaves...etc
History is filled with powerful men who had wives who either looked the other way or found a reason to stay in marriages with them.
The Unholy Trinity
Hillary Clinton is bi-sexual,and most likely is more homosexual than heterosexual. Yoko Ono is the most recent to admit to having homosexual relations with Hillary Clinton. Her and Bill were married in order to help each other fulfill their political ambitions. Just like Tina Turner said: "What's Love Got To Do With It?" It is easier for a womanizing man to climb the political ladder if he is married and has a family. It is also easier for a homosexual woman to climb the same ladder if she is married with children.
Hillary Clinton is"for" women, and "for" anybody, only if she can use them for sex , money, or to further her ambitions. She is the unholy trinity: an enabler,a user, and a cold blooded murderer. And since the United States was founded by sadistic murderers, it is only natural that she should be the next president.
David Wootten, Acworth, Georgia wrote:
"A recurring strain in these comments was that Trump may be bad, but Hillary is equally bad, or worse.
Is she?
Over the years I have seen corrupt lawmakers and officials charged, prosecuted, and sent to prison. Both Republicans and Democrats.
Over the course of her four decades in public life, Republicans have had her and her husband investigated numerous times. None of these amounted to much.
There are two possibilities here: either she is extraordinarily sharp and Republicans extraordinarily inept, or the accusations had little merit and were witchhunts."- PeterStipposted 7 years ago
0 
Critics called it crass… even a publicity stunt.
But when GOP nominee Donald Trump held a Sunday press conference with women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment and assault, he sent a powerful message.
One of those victims, Juanita Broaddrick, is only looking for one thing. She wants a long overdue acknowledgment that Bill Clinton raped her nearly 40 years ago — and that Hillary Clinton knew about it.
But Hillary Clinton’s refusal to admit the facts, to even acknowledge Broaddrick’s existence, isn’t just crass politics. It’s an open declaration of war against rape survivors everywhere.
And it disqualifies Hillary Clinton from serving as president — or as a credible advocate for women.
If you’re not familiar with Broaddrick’s story, it’s something straight out of your worst nightmare. She was volunteering on Bill Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign in Arkansas in 1978 when she met him at a hotel for coffee and to discuss strategy.
That’s where Clinton allegedly violently raped her and nearly bit through her lip. His parting words to her, according to Broaddrick, was that she should put some ice on her wound.
What kind of man would do that? Well, exactly the kind of man who has left a trail of sexual harassment and assault victims in his wake — and who would violate a White House intern with a cigar.
A man like Bill Clinton.
Even the liberal Vox website, founded by left-leaning journalists, calls Broaddrick’s story credible and says she deserves to be believed. And of course she does — she told close associates about the incident shortly after it happened, and they have repeatedly vouched for the injury to her lip.
Broaddrick’s worst transgression, at least as far as Clinton backers are concerned, is that she waited years to go public with her story, and even tried to hide it. But that’s incredibly typical in rape cases, where between 70 percent and 90 percent of assaults are never reported.
In other words, dismissing Broaddrick’s claim requires us to dismiss the vast majority of rapes that occur in the United States. And that’s unacceptable.
Broaddrick hasn’t sought money or fame for what happened to her — like every rape victim, her most sincere wish is that this attack never occurred. Barring that, she’d like some sort of acknowledgment from the guilty party that it did, in fact, happen.
Now, liberals are quick to point out that Hillary Clinton is running for president, not Bill. And they’ll tell you with a straight face that the sins of Bill the spouse should not extend to Hillary the candidate.
Let’s not kid ourselves here. These are the same leftist hypocrites who raised a ruckus over Melania Trump’s immigration status, her past modeling shoots, and whether her speechwriter cribbed some lines from a Michelle Obama speech. They’re seriously trying to argue that plagiarism is a relevant campaign issue, but rape isn’t.
And let’s not fall for that pathetic old claim that, by dismissing victims like Broaddrick, Hillary Clinton is acting out of allegiance and loyalty to her spouse. Hillary Clinton is no Tammy Wynette, and she’s not just standing by her man. She’s doing what she’s always done — she’s standing against anyone who gets in her way. By refusing to even acknowledge Juanita Broaddrick and her suffering, both the Clintons are insulting and harming all rape victims. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPpzdmQo650
I don't think Hillary Clinton gets support despite her husband's actions. I think she gets support because she's a strong candidate to her supporters. It's the whole apple and oranges thing... But I don't support her at all, mainly because of her shady business and political practices. My lack of support for her has to do with her job as a potential president of this country. She is the lesser of two evils, and luckily I don't have to choose between either.You're right. Woman has sex with another woman's husband, she's at fault. The wife of the abuser has every right to demean said harlot. Women who keep silent for over a decade, then 3 weeks before elections, accuse. Sure, makes complete sense.
Related Discussions
- 6
If Hillary Clinton is a bisexual, then why doesn't she come out and tell the wor
If Hillary Clinton is a bisexual, then why doesn't she come out and tell the world?Today, it is a badge of honor to come out of the closet. Hillary and Bill never had the average marriage. Bill has had a long line of women problems, while we hardly hear about Hillary. I don't care one way or...
- 27
Why are democrats mad at Russia and not at Hillary Clinton nor the DNC? They lie
Why are democrats mad at Russia and not at Hillary Clinton nor the DNC? They lied and cheated!The DNC smeared Bernie Sanders and colluded with the mass media to rig the primary elections.The DNC stole debate questions and gave them to Hillary Clinton before the debate.The DNC hired thugs to go...
- 22
What are your thoughts on Hillary being cleared of all responsibility by the Rep
What are your thoughts on Hillary being cleared of all responsibility by the Republicaninvestigative committee according to the 800 report regarding Benghazi?
- 8
Is anyone voting for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a women?
Is anyone voting for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a women? Should the fact that Clinton is a women be a factor in our reasoning for giving her a vote? I hear a lot of women say that this is our time to show everyone that women can accomplish the role of president. I truthfully don't see...
- 72
There's a HIGH Probability That Hillary Clinton Will Be Our NEXT
PresidentLove or hate Hillary Clinton, she is leading significantly in the polls for Democratic presidential candidate. She has the political smarts & experience to led this country. She also have a huge & influential following of people from celebrities to everyday...
- 82
Is Melania Trump an Enabler?
I feel bad for Melania Trump. She seems like a perfectly nice woman. She maybe doesn't write all of her own speeches, but she seems like an otherwise decent person.However, given Donald Trump's comments on sexual assault and the flood of women coming forward to detail how he assaulted them, must we...