Why is Everyone So Worked Up Over the Coronavirus?

Jump to Last Post 101-150 of 158 discussions (1439 posts)
  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

    Gotta meme of Trump standing in front of the Constitution? It would be very apt at this time....

    1. profile image0
      Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Here ya go. Oops, too late. Obama beat him to it. You didn't care then, don't pretend like you care now.
      https://cdn10.bigcommerce.com/s-dcvfa4/product_images/uploaded_images/onenationundersocialism-89317.1353909585.1280.1280.jpg?t=1465235994

      1. Randy Godwin profile image60
        Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Didn't think you would post any meme anti-Trump because you admire him greatly, Joey.

        1. Valeant profile image75
          Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Whoa, let's not confuse Onus' hate of a black president and the Democrats as him being in support of Trump, who he rarely criticizes.  We might offend him.

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I was concerned about that, Val. roll

          2. profile image0
            Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I'm just glad that I can actually criticize the president without being called a racist.
            As usual everything is racist to liberals. Keep pulling the race card till it becomes meaningless.

            This is for all the Bernie lovers out there...
            https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/90594966_548463579422699_3187259968680099840_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=OMbd0v3jOIUAX9VBbMB&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&_nc_tp=7&oh=1ddd02d26e5e1286aa4997a9d34d2716&oe=5EA15A40

            1. Randy Godwin profile image60
              Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              lol Show me where you've ever criticized Trump, Joey.

              1. profile image0
                Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I do all the time.

                1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                  Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Sorry, there's no record of such, Joey. Why don't you repost one of your past anti-Trump memes?

                  1. profile image0
                    Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    No. And stop calling me Joey. It's harassment.

            2. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Man, the Red-Headed Libertarian is an idiot.

  2. profile image0
    Onusonusposted 4 years ago

    https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/90891607_1363130520559646_3320481427476185088_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=AQ2y1RvHIQgAX_Y0jC2&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&oh=dbe78866b7c25173c4dad73dbed82593&oe=5EA30D33

  3. crankalicious profile image90
    crankaliciousposted 4 years ago

    Been reading Fox News fairly regularly over the past few weeks. Pretty much everything pro-Trump on these forums comes straight from there, which just goes to show you where all our conservative friends get their news.

    1. TessSchlesinger profile image60
      TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Daily Mail in the UK.

  4. IslandBites profile image92
    IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

    13,347 new cases in US. 247 new deaths.

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      USA  68,905 cases -- 1,037 deaths. as of 3/26/2020

      the population in the USA as of 2018   --- 327 million

      Perhaps we should put the cases versus the population in perspective.

      1. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        If the number of cases doubles every week or day, how long to infect (50%, 80%, whatever) of the population?  At that figure, how many deaths, based on the mortality rate seen so far and ignoring what will happen when the health care system is overloaded (I see some hospitals are considering a DNR for what they think are terminal Corona cases already)?

        If you're going to put into perspective, give the whole story - how fast it spreads and how long it will take to cover most of that 325 M people - and what the expected results will be.  An exponential growth rate has a way of starting very slow but accelerating unbelievably rapidly after a fairly short time period.  Something few people grasp.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I am sorry if I have given you the idea I am not taking this virus very seriously.  Because I certainly am. I am an RN and watched first hand what could happen when a new virulent virus is ignored. H1N1 kept me very busy for almost a year. It took the lives of all age groups. So, I daily watched patients, as well as their loved ones, suffer through the illness as well as the death of their loved ones. Many children died, and those little bodies became my responsibility to wrap and
          accompany to the morgue.

          So, I can with all honesty tell you I take this virus very seriously. I am keeping an eye on the death rates, not so much the stats on how many have acquired the virus.  I don't think we have any idea how many have it, and how many have had it and recovered.

          My comment was to point out the death rate as of today is low compared to what it could be. This could certainly change overnight. However, I feel we should be realistic about the survival rate, in my opinion, it could be so much worse.

          What is important due to the country being in lockdown we are seeing cases come out and be detected. And belives it or not when you look nationwide at the stats of new cases this number could have been so much worse. Just consider we have over 327 million people taking precautions most on lockdown. If it was virulent entire households would be infected and counted. We have not heard of this happening. If it is it will again work to bring the virus under control due to the lockdown.

          In my opinion, this virus was most likely very virulent and around for much longer in 2019. Many may have already lost their lives to it, and many had it and recovered. The numbers now may just be the end of the season and on the downturn. I say this because the death toll compared to our population is low. We are either at the beginning of this virus and it will be a very high death count or we may be at the turning point in the next week or so.

          Your perspective makes sense, we just know too little about when it started, how many have been infected to date. It has been around for three months, most flu seasons (as a rule) last about 4 to 5 months. If we look at previous stats from yearly seasonal flu that are estimated with large spreads we are not doing to bad in regards to deaths over three months. The unknown infection rate is what makes all of this scary.

          We just can't predict growth rate without flushing out all that have it and have had it and gone untreated.  I think with this lockdown it will bring out all that is at this point infected, and further isolations of persons these people came in contact will further aid to curb infection numbers.

          My comment was meant to offer some form of comfort, not to impress I am not taking the virus seriously.  I certainly as a nurse take any health issue seriously. It is discouraging to see something that was meant as positive be seen as negative. I certainly did not want it to be.

          I do grasp the seriousness of the virus, but I feel we just do not have enough knowledge about this virus to predict how virulent it will be. If you look at the known numbers it is virulent. If we consider the unknown it may not be as virulent as we think it to be. However, you are totally correct if we go by the known number, which we should be doing, this would be considered a very virulent virus.

          1. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Well said, grounded in reality, and much appreciated comment.

            You are exactly right, we have no idea which direction this could go, at this time.

            We are either at the beginning, and this will continue to multiply in severity for weeks to come.  Or hopefully your idea that we might be nearing the end of a 5 month cycle, as we head into spring, proves correct... it could save the country if so.

            We don't know how severe it is, only how bad it can be for the most severe cases.

            We don't know if this will mutate and become a more deadly virus, or weaken and become something that our bodies can more easily resist.

            I appreciate your perspective on it, in these times few if any responsibilities are more of a hardship and challenge than what Nurses have to go through.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              The numbers today infection rate and the death toll has declined today in comparison to the day before.
              March 26 --- 13,347 new cases in the US. 247 new deaths.
              March 27 --- 9,026new cases in US 135 new deaths.

              Hopefully, we have seen the peak, and are now starting to take a turn to flatten the curve. I think in another week we will start to see good progress at flattening the curves.

              I am going to be checked for titer as soon as I can obtain the test. I believe I had the virus in early November. It's just my opinion but I think there are any that have already had the virus. I think that could be why numbers are low. The flu cases that may have been reported that were hospitalized were added to seasonal flu numbers,
              which were very high.  This virus seems virulent and just did not produce the number of infected to match the death toll.

              Yesterday the Dr. Birx announced yesterday that titer test would be available soon. She was very interested in finding out how many have had the virus and gone untreated. I treated with my Dr. for a month to rid myself of the symptoms. So did my son, best friend, and grandson. My grandson was well in flour days. I hope I had it, I will carry antibodies to it. I am not one that would want to take a vaccine that was not tested for the length of time it should be.

              1. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Don't be too sure.  Medical experts are not prepared, yet, to say that having it will give immunity.  There is always the chance of mutation, as in the flu, and no one is prepared to say Covid-19 doesn't mutate very rapidly.

                1. crankalicious profile image90
                  crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Exponential math appears serious to some (thanks, Wilderness!) and not so to others.

                  Math illiteracy certainly is a shame.

          2. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I did indeed take your comment as trying to minimize the seriousness of the disease.  I am happy that you disabused me of that notion.

            I see people every day that don't think this is a big deal, that we are grossly overreacting.  I highly disagree with them - this thing is very real and very deadly for a great many people.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I can see where some of my comments could be misconstrued. I did feel we should keep calm, and not panic. And compared it to N1H1. I did this to point out we have had some very bad flu seasons. Most have numbers that would shock most.  I take this virus very seriously, and I am doing all I can to follow all the rules. I can't join in the panic due to my personality and the fact I am a nurse.  I guess being involved in the flu outbreak year after year makes me less scared.  What I have always witnessed the majority of hospitalized patients with flu get well and return to their lives. This virus has a high cure rate as well. I did not even point that out due to I had hoped to not use compassion in regard to any deaths caused by this virus.  What gives me pleasure is that this flu does not seem to infect young children as many strains of flu have.

              1. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                The final sentence is the one ray of pleasure in the whole thing - that children, while not immune, are not particularly susceptible either.  In fact, are less susceptible than older people (we think).

                Flu numbers shock me - I had no idea so many died of the common flu that I got every year my kids were in school.  But this is NOT the flu we're facing here - it is only similar, and not very similar even then.  It is something new.  Perhaps mutated from a flu virus, but perhaps not as well - either way it is not the flu.  Or so I'm coming to believe after seeing the experts make that point more than a few times.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  You believe right. This is a new flu, as all were at one time or another. It seems to be more virulent than most due to it hitting the respiratory system. This makes it more dangerous. The H1N1 actually is what made me know it was time to retire. It was a time in my life that still haunts me. This virus will be concerned like all that came before it. It just will take some time to create a vaccine. As time passes we all will develop antibodies to covid19.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                    Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Very few people have been tested for the virus yet, Shar. I think we should wait until they are to  put some sort of perspective on the number of persons who have the virus before predicting the peak of the illness.

                    I realize we want the numbers to go down quickly, but so far, they haven't.

                  2. wilderness profile image94
                    wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    I'm seeing reports that hospitals, and care givers, are beginning to talk about what to do when equipment runs out and the hospital is overwhelmed. 

                    Do they end the objection to DNR - do they instead institute an automatic DNR to elderly or what is thought to be terminal patients?  A nurse today on the TV talked about seeing an 80 year old and a 30 year old need the same ventilator (hadn't happened yet, but is likely to), and what it would feel like to have to decide which one gets it and which one dies.

                    I can't imagine a doctor or nurse being put in that position.  Absolutely devastating and career ending.

        2. IslandBites profile image92
          IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Also, 'at the end of the day' those numbers are going to be small when the CDC get all the data and get the estimates. That's how they did the H1N1 numbers and how they do the FLU numbers every year.

          E.g. WHO reported deaths for H1N1 are 18K+, the CDC estimates are 284K. Right now, the global Coronavirus deaths are 23K. The numbers we have right now, are declared numbers and its been only three months.

          US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated the global death toll from the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic at more than 284,000, about 15 times the number of laboratory-confirmed cases.

          The World Health Organization (WHO) has put the number of deaths from confirmed 2009 H1N1 flu at a minimum of 18,449, but that number is regarded as well below the true total, mainly because many people who die of flu-related causes are not tested for the disease.

    2. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      March 27, 2020
      New cases +9,026
      new Deaths 135

      Perhaps we are starting to end peak, and head towards leveling out.

      1. crankalicious profile image90
        crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Math says no.

  5. TessSchlesinger profile image60
    TessSchlesingerposted 4 years ago

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ … d-leaders?

    OMG! The difference between Trump and other world leaders. In pictures.

    1. peterstreep profile image81
      peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      He simply does not understand what the virus means to his country., or the world. A virus does not discriminate between rich or poor. Boris Johnsen is infected, so Prince Charles.
      And now, more people are getting infected in the US than in China?
      Indeed, compare worldleaders and how they react upon this crisis situation and you can compare...
      To me Angela Merkel made a brilliant speech last week.

  6. profile image0
    Onusonusposted 4 years ago

    https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/90853148_1622370001259550_8374563336682995712_o.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=9cmoGqmcTSMAX_DfwOx&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&_nc_tp=7&oh=127f770363da444c27b350c4eb65d1a2&oe=5EA3F20A

  7. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

    Still waiting on the anti-Trump meme, Joey. tongue

    1. profile image0
      Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I've asked you to stop calling me that. Stop harassing me. I don't want to bicker with you.

      1. Valeant profile image75
        Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Then stop spamming the forums with right-wing false memes, Joey.

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          It makes him edgy when someone asks him to prove his false memes. He then accuses them of "harassment" to keep from having to back up his silly memes.

        2. Ken Burgess profile image71
          Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          What is right-wing to you is just fact filled memes to most people.

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            This explains a lot then, Ken. You actually believe all of his memes. Okay!

            I didn't realize you knew "most people."

          2. Valeant profile image75
            Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            By most, you mean the 40% that support the liar-in-chief?  Right?

            1. Ken Burgess profile image71
              Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              No I mean the 90% that know nancy is a Nut Job.

              1. Valeant profile image75
                Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Must be the 50% of imaginary friends you have.  What's your source?

        3. profile image0
          Onusonusposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          You're being very rude. I'd ask you to stop acting like a child but I know that's impossible.

          1. Valeant profile image75
            Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Reported.

  8. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

    Like posting untrue or misleading memes isn't childish, roll

  9. TessSchlesinger profile image60
    TessSchlesingerposted 4 years ago

    This is  scary. I wonder how many people are going to die before a certain section of people in the USA realizes that their lives are on the line as well.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl … world.html

    1. wilderness profile image94
      wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Watched an interview of a young woman, early twenties, yesterday.  She appeared to have, at most, half a dozen connected brain cells.  Claimed no young were dying, didn't care if the old died and that the whole thing was a conspiracy by "old people" to control the young.

      Yes, there are those out there that refuse to live in reality.  From both sides, for some seem to forget that locking down an entire country will kill far more than any virus ever could.  There must be a balance, and an acceptance that there will be deaths.  Don't do enough and more will die from the virus.  Do too much and millions will die from riots and poverty as the economy collapses into third world conditions.

      1. TessSchlesinger profile image60
        TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        And then, again, you could just nationalize the wealth of the billionaires and share it so that nobody dies of poverty.

        Really depends on what you find acceptable.

        1. Readmikenow profile image95
          Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I think that was done in Venezuela with disastrous results. Like socialism, it worked for awhile, then the wealthy, who knew how to create companies and jobs left.  They took as much of their wealth with them.  The government then tried to run things, and that only made things much worse. I advise against following the economic model of Venezuela.

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            The problem with socialism (which is what Tess is proposing) is that eventually one runs out of other people's money.  And when that happens the whole thing falls apart.

        2. wilderness profile image94
          wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          LOLOLOLOL  This is something we hear all the time from socialists wishing access to what others have built.  Steal the wealth of the top 1% and all the problems are solved!!!

          Unfortunately, the total wealth of that group won't run the country for a single year, let alone reconstruct an economy on the verge of breakdown.

          So it depends not on what is found acceptable, but on reality rather than wishful thinking.  The socialists of the world will never accept that, but it is true nonetheless.

  10. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

    Trump finally implements DPA after approving it 12 days ago. What was he waiting for?

  11. Sharlee01 profile image84
    Sharlee01posted 4 years ago

    Thanks Randy...  You stay well, follow all the precautions, they really do help.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image60
      Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I have no problem with isolation, Shar. In fact, I prefer it. My wife and I live 5 miles from any sort of commercial establishment with very few neighbors, and none we aren't related to. We have a several hundred acre farm with cattle and a full pantry and freezer.

      We're ready for the zombie attack. yikes

      1. MizBejabbers profile image92
        MizBejabbersposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        That sounds like paradise, Randy. My son in Texas lives out like that. He has 30 acres with a creek in the middle a few miles from Tyler. If they got too hungry, they could kill one of the wild hogs they have to watch out for. If things get too bad, I guess we could go live down there, except that my husband doesn't like Texas. But they are living in a tiny house while they build their house. But I guess we could buy a mobile home or a camper trailer and get blown away. Even that would be better than dying from the coronavirus.

      2. Ken Burgess profile image71
        Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        That explains a lot.

        Its easy to support the elites perspectives when you are detached from the working-middle-class Americans, you don't have to contend with interacting with countless people daily, traffic, noisy neighbors, homeless on the street corners, you are as free from those realities as the elites in Congress... detached from the daily grind.

        1. Valeant profile image75
          Valeantposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Seriously, Ken.  Who do you think you are?  You judge the entirety of his life experience by the fact that he lives a little off the beaten path.  Makes me wonder how someone who grew up in such a liberal area like Cape Cod could turn into such a conservative.

        2. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          lol It's not as if I don't get out in the world, Ken. I"m no elitist by any stretch of your imagination. I do enjoy the lack of traffic and noisy neighbors though. As well as the daily grind, as you put it.

        3. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Ken, Hey Randy was sharing. I think we could all do a bit of that with all the problems this crisis is causing. It has upended many of us.  Hey, how about you share what's going on with you while you are in lockdown. I mean we will have plenty of time to fight on another day. You and your loved ones stay safe and well...

          1. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            As you are so kind to defend one who is so quick to be harsh towards others, I will defer to your sensibility.

            I have two young teens at home, my wife is a RN who will be working in a COVID-19 wing, and I am a Security Supervisor for a place that is all too busy, and has too many people continually coming through from all over the world (not an airport).

            I will be in the thick of what is to come in the near future, as I was for 9/11, as will my wife, I can't say I'm overly thrilled for it.

            Thank you for the well wishes, to you and yours as well.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I was just making an attempt to promote calm, sharing here in this small community. I have since realized it is not something that is possible.
              Prayers are coming your way... Stay safe

          2. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Thanks Shar, but I don't pay Ken much attention. My daughter is an RN and my grandson in Atlanta has a wife who's a nurse as well. They are both working their butts off during this crisis and I worry very much about their welfare.

            Simply because I'm relatively safe from the epidemic doesn't mean I don't worry about anyone. We all will be affected by this  virus in some manner.

            1. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Seriously, best of luck to all and especially those in healthcare.

            2. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I think we should all take a step back, and realize we are all on edge, vulnerable due to this virus.  It would not hurt to be a bit kinder to each other.  I can imagine the worry our wife and you n=must be under having two nurses in the field. Yes, we are all affected by this virus. Some will have to endure the death of loved ones. Some will be economically destroyed. Some will be psychologically destroyed. Our country will see the destruction for some time to come. A will the world.

              I will pray for you and yours. ( praying gives me comfort).

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Thanks for your prayers although I'm not religious. Good thoughts are always welcome in any case. Hope we all come through unscathed by this terrible virus.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Oh, Randy, I have to laugh... I figured you most likely were not too religious.  I will keep good thoughts. But, I am sending some prayers your way, just in case.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                    Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Okay, but I have my prayerblocker on! tongue  I have to around here with most of my relatives being Southern Baptists of some sort or another.

      3. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

        This is wonderful, one less friend I will have to worry about...  You're a lucky stiff Randy. 

        You know what Randy I see a bit of sharing going on here... I like this.

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I realize I'm lucky, Shar. I share my land and wilderness with my friends as they love to hunt, fish, and camp on our land. We all need to get through this virus as best we can.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Yes, I agree. Viruses don't have a political party. They do not discriminate. We are all in the same boat.

  12. Valeant profile image75
    Valeantposted 4 years ago

    https://hubstatic.com/14938860.jpg

  13. Valeant profile image75
    Valeantposted 4 years ago

    https://hubstatic.com/14938862.jpg

  14. TessSchlesinger profile image60
    TessSchlesingerposted 4 years ago

    So let's go back to the first question.

    "Why is everyone so worked up over the coronavirus?"

    1. Because they don't want to die?
    2. Because it has the capacity to kill a helluve lot of people if left unchecked?

    1. peterstreep profile image81
      peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Because as of today the US has the highest number of confirmed infections with 104,837, followed by Italy with 86,498 and China with 81,948.

      1. TessSchlesinger profile image60
        TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Yup. I could give you a good few links to articles and posts I have written about pandemics and their five different sources.

        But nobody wanted to know.

        Some months ago, about 3 weeks after coronavirus started, a friend said to me, "You need to stop going on about coronavirus - it's just like SARS. Nothing serious is going to happen."

        She's eating her words now. We are in a very serious lockdown in South Africa. Step outside your home for any other reason than medical and food and you will be arrested and jailed for six months.

        1. peterstreep profile image81
          peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Yes, here in Spain too.
          On the positive note though. I read that thanks to the virus there is far less air pollution and fewer people are dying because of this.
          The virus has put a brake on consumerism, which is a good thing.
          The bad thing is that millions of small businesses will suffer because they don't have clients. The whole B&B industry, tourism, restaurants, bars, musicians, garden centers, small shops etc. Financially it's a disaster and a start of a recession.
          You can't downplay that one.

          1. TessSchlesinger profile image60
            TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            No, you can't downplay it.

            It does, however, expose some serious weaknesses in having the economic system linked to business. So entrenched has that become that few people realize that business is just one form of an economic system, and that it's way past time we designed a new economic system for the 21st century.

            I think we are definitely going to have to look at things differently when this is all done.

            I also don't believe it's the last pandemic, and I think worse will come. We need to prepare.

      2. Live to Learn profile image60
        Live to Learnposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Look at the size of each country. Those numbers mean .00142 percent are identified as infected in Italy and .000318 in the US. The US would be better compared to Europe as a whole, which has a reported number of 283,386 cases.

        I wouldn't put faith in the numbers reported by the government of China. I hear that 20 million cellphones have gone silent since the virus hit. We could be looking at a much greater percentage of that country having been infected.

        1. peterstreep profile image81
          peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Yes, you are right Live to Learn that numbers are difficult to compare. As the Epidemic started earlier in China and Europe than in the US as well. And lots of people are not counted as they live under the radar.
          But It is definitely not something you can downplay, as the president of the US has done for a long time. It's ok for people on the countryside but people in cities should stop socializing immediately as to stop spreading the virus.

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            One of the news shows here touted the "stay at home" programs, saying it was resulting in empty streets.  As evidence in a large city they showed empty streets...by pointing the camera three stories up so you couldn't see the street at all, but there wasn't a soul in sight.  Have to wonder how many people were fooled by the "faux news".

          2. dianetrotter profile image62
            dianetrotterposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            What draw attention is the number of famous (politicians, musical artists, medical staff, known acquaintances) die. That makes it close and personal. I don't hear about people dying of flu often, though I know they do.

            I'm witnessing the effect of COVid19. 

            Disgressing a little, the sad thing is that people don't believe what others say (even though substantiated by video, death or whatever) because theothers are in a different group. 

            We should be able to accept facts. The facts should not change based on who is telling them ... unless one is writing an editorial, injecting spi

        2. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Hey, I was going to say that. I have decided to save my energy. But your answer is so logical.

    2. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I agree...

  15. Valeant profile image75
    Valeantposted 4 years ago
    1. crankalicious profile image90
      crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Let's listen to Rudy!



      https://hubstatic.com/14940992.jpg

  16. IslandBites profile image92
    IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

    Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of the faces of the Trump administration's coronavirus task force, on Sunday warned that the novel coronavirus could infect millions of people in the United States and account for more than 100,000 deaths.

    Speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," Fauci said that, based on what he's seeing, the U.S. could experience between 100,000 and 200,000 deaths from Covid-19.

    "We're going to have millions of cases," Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, noting that projections are subject to change, given that the disease's outbreak is "such a moving target."

  17. Valeant profile image75
    Valeantposted 4 years ago

    11 to 100,000, what went wrong?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_arjED6ohg

  18. Valeant profile image75
    Valeantposted 4 years ago

    https://hubstatic.com/14942767.jpg

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I must break my own commitment...  Enjoyed your comment.

    2. TessSchlesinger profile image60
      TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      ++++

  19. Readmikenow profile image95
    Readmikenowposted 4 years ago

    https://hubstatic.com/14944390_f1024.jpg

    1. crankalicious profile image90
      crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      While I agree with this cartoon, I think the question boils down to this: who do you trust to deal with the coronavirus, those who trust science and scientists or those who don't?

      1. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Who do you trust, politicians more interested in their personal power or a man that makes mistakes but tries to do best for everyone?

        1. profile image0
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I don't trust anyone who lies incessantly .

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Some don't believe he lies, Sandy. He simply "exaggerates" all of the time. tongue

          2. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Hmm.  That would be every politician in Washington.  And most of those stuck in state congress as well.

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              If you say it, it must be tue, no matter the level of exaggeration. Who does that remind you of?

              1. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Do you disagree?  Do know politicians that never lie (exaggerate, spin, intentionally give wrong impressions, etc.)?  Or do you share my opinion that politicians make their living telling lies to the rest of us?  Can you possibly listen to a politician on the stump and believe that they truly intend to follow through on all their promises?  Even the Great Obama admitted he had no intention of passing the ACA; that we would have to elect him again to get that promise.

                1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                  Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  "Do know politicians that never lie (exaggerate, spin, intentionally give wrong impressions, etc.)? "

                  Not to the extent Donald does. Give me an example of a comparable liar in DC. It should be a piece of cake as there are so many according to you.

                2. profile image0
                  PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Now, you're doing what you often do, sliding the bar away from your original statement,

                  I said:  "I don't trust anyone who lies incessantly ."

                  You replied: "Hmm.  That would be every politician in Washington.  And most of those stuck in state congress as well."

                  Now, you've changed it to:  "Do know politicians that never lie (exaggerate, spin, intentionally give wrong impressions, etc.)? "

                  This is why it's a waste of time to talk with you. When caught, you attempt to slither away by changing the bar.

                  Not interested.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                    Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    I'm still waiting on Dan to give a comparable liar to Trump, Sandy. I'll be waiting a long time I'll wager.

                  2. wilderness profile image94
                    wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Of course you're not, for you can't (honestly) answer the question.  If it makes you feel better, do you know any politicians that don't spin, exaggerate or intentionally give the wrong impression on a steady basis?  A politician that commonly tells the whole story rather than the portion they want you to hear?  You can even expand that to major "news" organizations if you like, for the do much the same any more: intentionally spin a story, with only part of the relevant information, to give a false impression.

        2. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Dan, I applaud your fortitude. However, it is so evident that Crankalicious has a very strong opinion that he feels the president has failed in his job to handle the virus crisis.  It is very evident the President not only respects Dr,  Fauci and Dr. Birx, both scientists in the study of viruses, but he is also taking their advice and so far following that advice.

          The Dem's in Washington called Trump a racist when he closed our borders to China. That's factual. So is it that Trump, in the end, has done nothing but listen to all on his task force.

          He has a right to his opinion, so do you. In the end, it well appears the president has supported and acted on the word of the Scientist on his task force.  He puts them front and center every day to provide us with updates. The meme just does not represent the facts. Trump is doing a wonderful job, he is keeping us as safe as he can, he is keeping us informed, and he is trying to help financially. He is stockpiling so this kind of problem will not occur again. I for one am proud and amazed to see all that is being accomplished. Hey, to each their own. Your fighting a losing battle with Crank...

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Oh, I don't know.  Crank can think when he can set aside his feelings about Trump.  Some of the others here don't seem to have that ability at all.  Either that or they're so wound up about anything Trump does or says that it consumes their whole life.

            1. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Thanks, Dan. I feel the same way about you.

              All evidence points to Trump not taking this seriously and now the spin machine has gone into full swing and Trump's sheeple are trying to pretend like Trump didn't say the things he said about the virus and didn't take it seriously. Remember "it's all under control" and "this will be over soon... like a miracle"?

              A much better tack for the Trumpers is to point to the shift by scientists on masks. Now, it seems, scientists are saying masks ARE necessary. So the easy conclusion there is that no matter what President Trump did and no matter how seriously he took this early on, the lack of guidance from the scientific community on masks means that no matter what Trump did, his efforts would have come up short.

              That doesn't excuse him for dismissing the seriousness of the virus or for Trumpers so easily parroting the Fox spin. You know, when their Fuhrer says something, they say it too. And when his state-run news channel (Fox) says something, it's amazing how quickly it pops up in these forums.

              Even Mitch McConnell has said Trump's response was inadequate, but Mitch blames impeachment and the Dems for distracting everyone.

              I think anyone who says Trump's response was "great" and "perfect" is a Trump sheeple or on drugs. However, if you think about the perfect response and how Americans might have reacted to early shut downs and such, I think the math suggests a limit to the success of even the perfect response. The range of infections and death would probably have stayed within a certain range no matter what. Unfortunately, so many people in these forums have demonstrated they are mathematically illiterate, that discussing such things seems pointless.

              Again though, I fall back to Trump's basic assertion that science is all a hoax and that he always knows better and has a natural ability to understand things better than our experts. It is that attitude, precisely, that will never produce optimal results.

              1. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                "So the easy conclusion there is that no matter what President Trump did and no matter how seriously he took this early on, the lack of guidance from the scientific community on masks means that no matter what Trump did, his efforts would have come up short."

                With this I think anyone objectively reasoning their way would agree.  NOTHING Trump, or anyone else, did would have prevented a massive problem.  People WILL have died no matter what steps we took, even if the idiots on spring break and other gatherings had not done that.

                My grandson works at WalMart, for instance, stocking shelves.  He is at great risk, as is his family, and nothing will, or could have, changed that.

                Yes, we see now things that we could have done differently.  We see that the Chinese are, and were, lying badly about the disease.  We see that banning travel was smart but insufficient; we should have banned internal travel as well.

                No question that mistakes were made, no question that we ALL down-played the virus.  Only time, and guesswork, will tell if we should have done more, causing vastly more damage to our economy, or not.  Never forget that people are going to be in massive trouble because of a failing economy.  I said before that our response MUST be balanced between saving lives and saving the economy that we all depend on for the very food on our tables, for our home, for heat in cold weather and AC in hot.

                Nor does it help to make gross exaggerations about Trump's "basic assertion that science is all a hoax".  It's hard to think of a greater exaggeration and does nothing to help anything.  If anything it hurts as people will pick up on it, believe such nonsense, and ignore anything he says, including instructions on how to mitigate the virus effects.  A decent case can be made that the millions of people making this silly assertion does at least as much damage as Trump has done with his comments.  Trump has said a lot of things, I believe, in an effort to keep the country calm and out of a panic situation - your comment can only cause panic, without helping anything at all.

                1. crankalicious profile image90
                  crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  It's not an exaggeration to say that Trump treats science as a hoax. There's ample evidence to support that assertion.

                  Again, anyone who says he knows more than the experts, is stupid.

                2. hard sun profile image79
                  hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  "People WILL have died no matter what steps we took, even if the idiots on spring break and other gatherings had not done that."

                  When was the last time the US lead the way among "developed" nations in a stat such as most cases of a virus? And, we aren't even testing as much as many of these nations. The leader has to take some responsibility here. Well, not if the people don't hold him accountable. I'm sure that Trump supporters, and Fox news, would have given Obama such a benefit of the doubt. Americans would have died no matter who were President..but, come on man.

                  1. Live to Learn profile image60
                    Live to Learnposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    The feds can give guidelines and the states make the decisions on what to implement and what not to.

                    Although it would have been political suicide I do wonder if Trump could have (not certain he has the power) quarantined areas like New York. Banning any from entry or exit, until they beat the virus. If we could have done that, it may have nipped this in the bud at the outset and made it might possible to divert a large percentage of resources.

                    However it would be open to massive lawsuits, violations of constitutional rights and fear of the government being too authoritarian.

  20. Readmikenow profile image95
    Readmikenowposted 4 years ago

    It appears the death rate for Coronavirus is now less than 1 percent.  According to men of science.

    "As such, the death rate of a disease is changeable, and depends on a variety of factors. These include the location of an outbreak, the health status of the infected person, and how much data has been accurately collected on the cases and deaths caused by the disease.

    The infection fatality ratio, or portion of all those infected and accounting for unreported cases who die, is thought to be 0.66 percent."

    https://www.newsweek.com/coronavirus-de … ts-1495308

    1. TessSchlesinger profile image60
      TessSchlesingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Newsweek hasn't fact checked its articles since 1995. They have had to recant many times. Check wiki.  So try another source.

    2. Readmikenow profile image95
      Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      "Newsweek hasn't fact checked its articles since 1995"

      Sure is easy to come online and make accusations with no proof...isn't it?


      Nesweek is just the vehicle, the statistics came from John Hopkins University.

      From the article.

      "According to Johns Hopkins University and indicated in the Statista map below"

      1. crankalicious profile image90
        crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Mike, I applaud you for not deviating from your efforts to downplay this whole thing. Good job.

        The death rate isn't as important as the infection rate and the lack of a vaccine to prevent the virus's spread. I'm stunned that you and others don't seem to understand that.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          You do realize how hard many are working all over the world to come up with a vaccine to a previously unknown virus?  The infection rate is very important the prevention of the spread with the mitigation requests that the Taskforce has put in place is precisely why the spread is under some control and ultimately decreases the death toll. The death toll really tells us if the mitigations are working. I am stunned you don't realize the importance of the death toll.

          Guess I consider the Bottomline, the death toll an indicator if all our efforts are working.  At this point, all is being done to come up with a vaccine as well as other treatment plans to decrease death.

          The death toll as it falls tells us we are on our way to being able to somewhat control the virus until the day we create a vaccine. Takes time to create a vaccine, that's just a fact.

          I watch the death toll overall. It gives me an idea of how well our measures are working, and where more measures in regard to areas in the country we need further measures. The death tolls remain low for Covid19 in the above states.

          Lots of variables to consider, population, it even appears in states like Hawaii, New Mexico, and Puerto Rico numbers may, (and I say may are decreased possibly due to climate. It could be due to the citizens doing better with mitigations. But, it does appear with past virus warmer climates do better-eradicating flu much quicker.

          1. IslandBites profile image92
            IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Jesus...


            SMH

            1. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Nk

          2. crankalicious profile image90
            crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I am not constantly downplaying the importance of this like Mike who is using the death rate to minimize what is going on. Those who are taking this seriously and have from the beginning do so because of the math related to the virus’s infection rate and potential and the fact that there is no immunity or vaccine to stop it.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I see where you are coming from, I have been following your comments. And see your point. My comment was in no way meant to minimize any aspect of this crisis.

              I am watching all stats at this point to measure how well the mitigation is working. In my opinion, one death is too many. We have been warned that the virus is virulent and spreads easily, which will produce large numbers of cases. The only thing we have to decrease spread is mitigation. It will take time to create a vaccine, as well as new treatments to help those infected.  This is a variable we need to face. It is my hope the one variable we can change is the death toll. Right now it's all about caring for the sick, making sure they get the medical care they need, to ensure they recover, live.

              So, I guess that's one reason I watch the death toll. If I see the cases getting the virus to go up and the death rate go down,  I assume more are getting the healthcare they need and survive.  This is all I think today we can ask for... But, in the coming weeks, I hope to see mitigations bring down the cases of infection come way down, as well as the death toll.

              I hope I have explained why at this point I am watching the death toll. Like

            2. Ken Burgess profile image71
              Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              This is correct there is no vaccine, there is no immunity, and the majority of humans have never been exposed to it meaning they are fully susceptible to it.

              The estimates of experts during Trump's briefings stated that they hope to have a vaccine in a year and a half.

              So for the next year and a half, we will most likely be contending with situations (work, travel, number of ill) worse than they are now.

              As this goes on, "normal" activities will be halted, and tens of millions will be out of work.

              So... is it any wonder that the President tries to go out there and say America can get through this, hopefully we can be back to normal in a month, that things will bounce back when this is over.

              Imagine having a President come out and say the opposite:  "Millions are going to die, tens of millions of jobs will be lost never to return, we are doomed as a nation"... that sounds more like a Democrats' schtick, one that wouldn't have very positive results under the circumstances.

              He gets out there daily and says... the experts are working on a cure, we have medicines that might help, we will get through it and we will bounce back... and only the idiots who don't care about America or Americans are wasting energy trying to tear him down now.

              The media sources and Democratic politicians that are still on the attack...they deserve nothing but scorn, all they are doing is flaming the fear and doubts, they are truly despicable people.

        2. wilderness profile image94
          wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I'm hearing that a vaccine is at least a year out.  Do you have suggestions on how to produce one?  Should we forget the massive testing that is what takes the time?  Should we ignore possible side effects, or not consider how effective it is?

          What can we do to produce a vaccine more rapidly?  I hear that one is available, just entering the testing stage; should we simply begin production and give it to everyone?

          1. crankalicious profile image90
            crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Dan, I hear that malaria drugs will solve our problems.

  21. IslandBites profile image92
    IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

    White House projects 100K to 240K coronavirus deaths as Trump tells US to prepare for ‘very painful two weeks’

    A somber President Trump told Americans to brace for “a very painful two weeks" and warned of thousands of more virus-related deaths.

    “This is going to be a rough two week period,” Trump said. “As a nation we’re going to have a really rough two weeks. Our strength will be tested and our endurance will be tried.”

    At another point, Trump said: "This could be a hell of a bad two weeks. This is going to be a very bad two or maybe even three weeks. This is going to be three weeks like we've never seen before."

    USA

    Total cases: 187,729   
    New cases: +23,941   
    Total deaths: 3,867   
    New deaths: +726

  22. IslandBites profile image92
    IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

    Meanwhile...

    USA   

    Total cases: 214,465   
    New cases: +25,935   
    Total deaths: 4,842   
    New deaths: +789   

    sad

    1. peterstreep profile image81
      peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      And rising.
      The problem is that many people don't take the virus seriously as nothing has happened in their own community yet. The President was downplaying the virus for a long time with all its consequences.

      ---"Second, President Trump says that the coronavirus will go away soon. Why can't people just have faith in our President. He says there's nothing to worry about."----

      Because the president didn't take the virus seriously, lots of other people didn't, as they looked for the leader of a country. And copied his behaviour. With unnecessary deaths as a result.

      It's still not over. As long as people are ignorant and going to the park and don't take enough physical distance while shopping the virus is going to spread.
      Cities are worst off as people are dependent on shops, places where more people come together.

      Over here in Spain at the moment, you are fined if you wander too far off while walking with the dog.
      And the US probably thought, o well, it's Italy, Spain, China. That's far away. This positive bias thinking that was clearly shown by president Trump has costed lives. That's a sad thing,

      1. Ken Burgess profile image71
        Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Trump closed the border to travel from China, the EU and WHO blasted him for it when he did it.

        Now Spain and Italy and France are dealing with an epidemic that is far worse than what we have in America.

        Yeah, the leaders in Spain are great, they were allowing marches all across Spain as recently as March 8th, 'Women's Day" I believe it was.  Brilliant leadership there.  I'm sure those mass marches didn't help spread it any.

        No one reacted more quickly, or with more consideration, than the Trump Administration to this pandemic.

        1. peterstreep profile image81
          peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Spain acted inadequately as well. The Women's Day march (great that you know about it.) was a big mistake as it helped the virus spreading enormously.
          At the same time Tump said the following:
          2nd of March -“We’re talking about a much smaller range” of deaths than from the flu"
          4th of March “It’s very mild,”
          .On March 7, he said, “I’m not concerned at all.”
          March 8: “We have a perfectly coordinated and fine tuned plan at the White House for our attack on Coronavirus.”
          On March 10, he promised: “It will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away.”
          On March 10, the World Health Organization reported 113,702 cases of the virus in more than 100 countries.

          March the 8th was apparently was when the shock really hit the world. But it should have been February the 8th. As the whole month of February, hardly anything was done in the western world, although the virus was spreading in Asia..
          President Trump was not the only leader who had it completely wrong. Thinking that it would pass.
          Sadly enough it's much more then a flew. It's the start of an economic crisis.

        2. IslandBites profile image92
          IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          No one reacted more quickly, or with more consideration, than the Trump Administration to this pandemic.

          Wow. SMH

          1. profile image0
            PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Ditto.

          2. crankalicious profile image90
            crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            The kind of response you'd expect from one of Trump's sheeple.

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Who, of course, is not defending Trump, but is merely a crusader for truth and accuracy.

              1. peterstreep profile image81
                peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Which is not an easy thing to do at the same time...

                1. crankalicious profile image90
                  crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  No one reacted more quickly, or with more consideration, than the Trump Administration to this pandemic.

                  A person who can actually type such a thing has no grasp of reality - or is operating in a completely different reality. Trump's own words completely contradict the conclusion of the sentence above.

                  1. profile image0
                    PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    But, remember, his fans like to say his words are meaningless, only his actions matter. That might be sorta kinda reasonable if the purveyors of this nonsense held a realistic view of Trump's actions. Instead, they seem to ignore the crap he actually does and give him credit for what others do. If anyone should get credit for slowing the pandemic, it should be the governors who took early action by closing nonessential businesses and issuing stay-at-home orders.

      2. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Here is an article that chronically provides what Trump did and when. I think it will perhaps clear up what Trump did, and when he did it. It also gives some context to a few of the trump quotes in your comment.

        Trump was taking reports from The World Health Organization (WHO) that reinforced China’s falsehoods, saying on Jan. 14 that “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in Wuhan, China.” This was five to six weeks after the opposite was confirmed. Trump also was being informed by the CDC daily on the progress of the virus.

        https://thefederalist.com/2020/03/31/th … he-danger/

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this
          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Japan, South Korea, and Thailand reported their first cases of novel coronavirus on JAN. 20.

            On JAN. 21, the first case of coronavirus in the United States was reported, of a man who had traveled from Wuhan, China. That is the case President Trump referred to the next day

            JAN. 24: The CDC confirmed the second U.S. case of coronavirus, adding again that “based on what we know right now, the immediate risk to America remains low.”

            JAN. 28: The WHO published another statement about the coronavirus, with a photograph and headline saying: “WHO, China leaders discuss next steps in battle against coronavirus outbreak.” Pictured are WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in Beijing with Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to the release, “The WHO delegation highly appreciated the actions China has implemented in response to the outbreak, its speed in identifying the virus and openness to sharing information with WHO and other countries.”

            Think about that: On Jan. 28, the WHO praised China for its “speed and openness” in dealing with the virus. The same day, President Trump expanded U.S. airport screenings to identify travelers showing symptoms and instituted mandatory quarantines.

            On JAN. 30, the WHO declared a global health emergency of international concern.

            On Jan. 30, the CDC confirmed publicly for the first time the person-to-person spread of Wuhan virus and applauded WHO’s decision. THAT VERY DAY, the president created the White House Coronavirus TASK Force to coordinate efforts regarding this new disease.

            The next day, JAN. 31, the president declared coronavirus a U.S. public health emergency and issued the BAN ON TRAVEL between the United States and China. (Biden criticized President Trump’s China travel ban, saying during an Iowa campaign event, “This is no time for Donald Trump’s record of hysteria and xenophobia.”)

            FEB. 4: The White House directed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to step up coronavirus diagnostic testing procedures.

            FEB. 5: The CDC issued a PUBLIC STATEMENT  saying, “While we continue to believe the immediate risk of 2019nCoV exposure to the general public is low, CDC is undertaking measures to help keep that RISK LOW.”

            FEB. 18: The CDC reaffirmed that the “risk to Americans from coronavirus is LOW”

            FEB. 20: The administration raised travel warnings to their highest level for Japan and South Korea.

            It was not until FEB. 26 that the FIRST CASE of suspected local transmission in the United States was announced by the CDC. President Trump that day named Vice President Pence to lead the Coronavirus Task Force. The next day, FEB. 27, Pence named Dr. Deborah Birx to serve as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator.

            On FEB. 29, the first death from the coronavirus was recorded in the United States. On that date, President Trump halted travel with Iran.

            On MARCH 11, the WHO declared coronavirus a worldwide pandemic. The next day, on MARCH 12, President Trump imposed travel restrictions on Europe and elsewhere. Biden criticized that decision also.

            Then, on MARCH 13, President Trump declared a national emergency.

            The single most important step taken by President Trump was his closing of U.S. travel with China, which happened on Jan. 31, something the president reminds us at every briefing.


            He’s right, but what he doesn’t say is he made that decision at a time the CDC was assuring us the risk to America was low, the WHO was covering for China, Democrats were trying to impeach the president, and Biden was attacking the decision as xenophobic.

            AS you see by the timeline above the Trump administration followed the National Security Council playbook almost to the letter.

            A 69-page National Security Council playbook on fighting pandemics laid out what to do on most fronts when trying to curb the spread of the disease. The first responsibility is to the individual's states for the welfare of their citizens and healthcare workers. The Federal Government is a backup, which in this case was very necessary for this crisis. It is up to Governors to request supplies which most have done. The president depleted the stockpile and has made every effort to obtain supplies from all types of sources to fill the requests. I suppose one could blame the Trump administration for not realizing the Obama administration did not have a sufficient stockpile. Although what president would ever imagine a crisis such as this virus. It would appear those responsible for these stockpiles may have been lacks for, who knows to how long.

            At any rate, I feel amazed at the number of all the needed supplies that are being acquired with such speed.  And I can't imagine how many more we would have died if Trump did not shut the borders to China, Europe, and the UK. This and him listening to his task force about hunting down this country promoting mitigations will be in the end what will keep the death rate down. Not sure what they will do next winter, because this virus will surely be back.

            I would imagine we won't agree on the way Trump handled this crisis, but I think he did a good job, and I think in the end he saved a lot of lives.

            1. Randy Godwin profile image60
              Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Of course you do, Shar. I expected nothing less...

              No response to the wiki description of the Federalist?

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I do not as a rule like the Federalist, I think they are clearly not the best source. I was looking for a simple timeline. Most timelines included Trump's personal tweets and opinion statements he made at his press conferences. I don't always appreciate his statements.  I spent time today to really have a look at the timeline, he worked quickly. But, he was slammed by most articles due to the depleted Government stockpiles. Not sure I would blame him for that. It seems most of the states Gov as well as the Obama ad. lacked at keeping a good medical supply stockpile. This is a problem, and should not have happened.

        2. peterstreep profile image81
          peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          But the simple fact remains.
          South Korea 4 deaths per million
          USA 25 deaths per million
          Covid-19 hit both countries at the same time.

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-con … tm_source=

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Your stats are correct. And after doing some reading it appears S. Korea was very quick to start testing. We were at a disadvantage due to lack of test kits. The USA took it's time to developed test kits on this virus. In my opinion, in the end, the mitigations will keep the death toll down, even perhaps lower than some of the yearly fuls we have experienced.  I can only hope...I am staying positive, does no good to wring hands or blame anyone for a  virus.

            My link was to point out the timeline of how the Government handled the crisis in the very first days. Many are just not aware of what was acctually done.

            1. peterstreep profile image81
              peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Let's hope so.

  23. EdwardLane profile image78
    EdwardLaneposted 4 years ago

    Thanks for your widening discussion of this topic. You sure got a great response!

  24. hard sun profile image79
    hard sunposted 4 years ago

    Also data from John Hopkins: "The U.S. topped 1,000 coronavirus deaths in a single day for the first time Wednesday, a daily death toll more than double that of two of America's most deadly illnesses – lung cancer and the flu."

    ---Is it now time to take this seriously? Trump even finally came around, if he doesn't change his mind sometime today.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/more- … r-BB122UBy

  25. PhoenixV profile image66
    PhoenixVposted 4 years ago

    Never let a plague go to waste, when playing partisanship.

    1. crankalicious profile image90
      crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I definitely think that, during a plague, one should not let falsehoods slide by unchallenged.

      1. PhoenixV profile image66
        PhoenixVposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        All the falsehoods or just your favorites.

  26. paradigmsearch profile image60
    paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

    Well, sports fans...

    My county has just ordered us to wear masks in public. That's right, "ordered". Here's the key quote: "law enforcement agencies throughout the county have the authority to enforce these orders as they deem necessary".

    1. Ken Burgess profile image71
      Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      It could be a lot worse, trust me.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9mxpkPEy0Y

      1. paradigmsearch profile image60
        paradigmsearchposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Good video. That's probably next.

  27. IslandBites profile image92
    IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

    “Well, it’s tragically fitting that we’re talking at the beginning of Holy Week because this is going to be the hardest and the saddest week of most Americans’ lives, quite frankly,” Adams told “Fox News Sunday,” comparing it to historic national tragedies. “This is going to be our Pearl Harbor moment, our 9/11 moment, only it’s not going to be localized. It’s going to be happening all over the country. And I want America to understand that.”

    Vice Admiral Jerome Adams, Surgeon General

  28. paradigmsearch profile image60
    paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

    Well, I've been self-quarantining for the last several days. Today I had to go to the pharmacy and the grocery store. The stores were disinfecting the carts after each use. Most people were wearing masks, some employees and customers were not. I was told cops are handing out citations. I was standing outside, a patrol car drove by; I'm sure he admired my new, red, sexy, bandanna. Still lots of empty store shelves and shortages; I'm kind of surprised the hoarding is still going on. One brilliant idea I got when I got home; I threw all the bags of canned goods into a corner; I'll give them a couple days for the virus to die before unpacking them. Am back in quarantine; I'll know in two weeks if I caught it.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image60
      Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Yep, it's like a secret spy mission everytime you go out shopping. I do believe there is a market for Tee shirts with a logo of, This is not a stick-up, especially if one is wearing a mask. yikes

      1. paradigmsearch profile image60
        paradigmsearchposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Took me awhile to remember the red bandanna over the face is the classic western motif for robbing a bank, etc. I'll try to remember to quit wearing it when the county's mask order is rescinded. big_smile

  29. Readmikenow profile image95
    Readmikenowposted 4 years ago

    Let us put this in perspective.  Doing this is to wonder exactly why this is happening.  The death rate for Coronavirus is not even close to the number of annual deaths from the common flu.  Yet, everyone is very comfortable with the thousands of annual deaths from the common flu.

    "Estimated Influenza Illnesses, Medical visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths in the United States — 2018–2019 influenza season

    CDC estimates that the burden of illness during the 2018–2019 season included an estimated 35.5 million people getting sick with influenza, 16.5 million people going to a health care provider for their illness, 490,600 hospitalizations, and 34,200 deaths from influenza (Table 1). The number of influenza-associated illnesses that occurred last season was similar to the estimated number of influenza-associated illnesses during the 2012–2013 influenza season when an estimated 34 million people had symptomatic influenza illness."

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/20 … jvh_j8Odlk

    1. IslandBites profile image92
      IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      ^ SMH

      1. tsadjatko profile image73
        tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Well said Mike, some people don’t care about putting anything in perspective because they are brainwashed to believe the media. Has one journalist asked Fauci or Trump why no one is as concerned about the thousands of deaths every year from the flu? Instead they ask ridiculous questions based on fake news reports of the moment which  they haven’t vetted or quote Trump out of context to propagate lies. I see Democrat governors on TV lamenting about 5 or 6 elderly who died from Covid19 over night yet not a word from them of sympathy for the multiple dozens of people who died the same night from car accidents and the flu. Not a word for them.
        Just goes to show you where they want to put the emphasis, on anything that contributes to chaos, perspective isn’t in the media’s vocabulary.

        1. Readmikenow profile image95
          Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Those numbers I posted are from the CDC.  Things are getting extremely crazy.  A woman in Pennsylvania got a fine for $225 because she took a drive.  Huh?  It just seems there is more to this than a pandemic.  They occur every so often and the world has NEVER reacted to it this way. 



          https://hubstatic.com/14953603.jpg

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Go ahead on with your business then, Mike. Go out and mingle...

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Randy, at some point we need to face we have two problems. And we need to face both. The crisis is one, and its cure could kill more than the virus. We need to continue all the things that can keep us relatively safe from catching a virus. But, we can't keep the country shut down much longer. I hope by the end of the month we will all have learned to
              continue all the precautions we are doing at this time, and use them in our daily lives for some time to come. Because this virus will be around for a few more years. We will get a vaccine, but until then, it's up to each of us to go about our lives and use precautions, to cut down the infection rate.  WE will keep the death toll down if we do.

          2. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            "A woman in Pennsylvania got a fine for $225 because she took a drive. "

            Link, please?  Because I flat out do not believe the police pulled her over for driving her car.

            1. paradigmsearch profile image60
              paradigmsearchposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I did a search for "Pennsylvania got a fine for $225" without the quotes. She wasn't initially pulled over for it, but the fine is real: https://www.wgal.com/article/york-count … /32032535#

              1. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Then she wasn't fined for driving her car, as was stated.  She was fined for violating the stay at home order.

                1. paradigmsearch profile image60
                  paradigmsearchposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  This is just pure speculation, but my guess is she might have been being obnoxious or rude during the stop and provoked the officer into giving her that ticket; after all, it was the only one in the state. big_smile

            2. Readmikenow profile image95
              Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Sure,

              "Police in Pennsylvania fined a woman more than $200 for taking a drive amid the coronavirus pandemic.

              Anita Shaffer, 19, was driving around her town to get out of the house last weekend when two state police cars pulled her over in York County. The officers reportedly initially pulled her over for a busted taillight and dark window tinting, but she was then fined for violating the state’s stay-at-home order.

              “He asked me if I was aware of the stay-at-home act,” she said. “I am aware of it, but I didn’t know it pertained to just driving,” she responded."

              https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news … ome-orders

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                She wouldn't have been pulled over if she didn't have vehicle violations, Mike. Makes a big difference...

                1. tsadjatko profile image73
                  tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Read the article Randy! Her father and she examined the car and there was nothing wrong with her light. If so they would have written her up for that. Of course you don’t need to read the article, you just make up your conclusions based on what you want your conclusion to be, the hell with the details.

                  “ The daughter and father also inspected the taillight when she got home and found it was working fine.”

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                    Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    So the cops lied? Must be Trumpers then. tongue

                2. wilderness profile image94
                  wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Gotta love her response - "I just didn't think it applied to me because I didn't want to obey it".

                  1. crankalicious profile image90
                    crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Agreed.

        2. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Perhaps not "brainwashed" just coming at the problem with a differing way of looking at the situation. Mike clearly stated flu stats. If one actually reads Mike's comment it is clear he offered no opinion, only sought to put the problem in perspective. This is where some took his comment as and read into it putting a very negative spin on his comment. Feeling he was downplaying the crisis and adding anyone that downplays the virus should be ashamed.

          IT's clear some are expressing facts and comparing Covid19 stats to yearly flu stats. Perhaps shedding a common sense more I might say positive approach. While some chose to look at the crisis as very different than the yearly flu. I guess once again it's all about the thought process and difference of opinions.

          In my opinion, this virus will be something we will have to deal with and live with.  As we have with every flu. I find it unrealistic to blame anyone or to think our Government can kiss it and make it go away... We will have no county if we keep it closed to much longer. Maybe time to face reality.
          We have two crisis, time to face both of them.

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            "If one actually reads Mike's comment it is clear he offered no opinion, only sought to put the problem in perspective."

            To put it into perspective, one must make mention of the some 150 million flue vaccines that are given each year and that the death toll would be much, much higher without those vaccines. 

            Our current "vaccine" for Covid-19 is social separation.  Projections are for some 2 million deaths without the use of that "vaccine" rather than the 100,000 or so we expect with it.  So perhaps they are similar...except we can protect ourselves from the common flue, and do so in vast numbers.

            1. Readmikenow profile image95
              Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Some honest research will show you the flu vaccine helps very little and it is usually only effective for elderly people or those with underlying health issues.  Everyone else, can handle seasonal flu.

              "All-cause mortality is nonspecific. Nevertheless, it is important to consider, especially in the elderly. Although our estimate of 4.6% vaccine effectiveness against all-cause mortality during flu season may seem disappointing, it amounts to approximately 47% of a plausible target: the rise in mortality that would have occurred during flu season had none of the elderly been vaccinated."

              https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/170/5/650/102527

              ALSO

              The death rate for corona virus is .66 percent.  Your odds of dying is a car accident are better.

              "The study published Monday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases medical journal estimates that about 0.66 percent of patients who become infected with the virus will die. When undetected infections aren’t taken into account, researchers found the coronavirus death rate was 1.38 percent."

              https://thehill.com/changing-america/we … lower-than

            2. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Yes, however, you can see by the CDC estimated numbers that even with a vaccine the numbers are higher than what we are presently dealing with.

              Today the USA has 360,689, death rate 10,691


              "CDC estimates that the burden of illness during the 2018–2019 season included an estimated 35.5 million people getting sick with influenza, 16.5 million people going to a health care provider for their illness, 490,600 hospitalizations, and 34,200 deaths from influenza "

              We have no idea of the final stats. However, one can see the mitigation has helped keep the numbers down,
              as a vaccine would have also done.

              It appears the 100,000 number that was predicted last week by the task force hopefully will not come to fruition. We will never know what the death rate would have been if the virus was just let to run its course. Yes, it well appears the mitigations have worked very
              well as a quasi vaccine.

              At some point, we will be able to protect ourselves from this flu too. We very well may have the same tolls. Flu kills even when a vaccine is available. But, I think the covid19 vaccine will be one that more people in our history will get.

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Hopefully, but there's no telling how many waves of the virus we'll have to endure before a vaccine is perfected.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Randy, There is one other thing that will protect us, and will take many out of the equation. Those that have had the virus will have developed antibodies to the virus. One could say this is one of the only good that will come out of this bout of the virus. As a rule, we have three or four bouts before a new vaccine can be developed and tested. However, Dr. Fauci made a statement last week he felt it would be about 18 months.

                  It sounds as if several companies are close to new anti-viral meds are coming to help with the symptoms of this virus.  Scientists all over the world are working creating a vaccine, maybe it will be fast tracked.

                  1. wilderness profile image94
                    wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Unfortunately that is not necessarily true (that we will gain immunity if we get the virus and recover; as an example we need a new, different flu shot every year because the virus mutates.  It remains to be seen what the mutation rate for Covid is.

                    1. Readmikenow profile image95
                      Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      I agree, considering we are now dealing with Covid 19...this is the 19th mutation of this particular strain of virus.

                    2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      That is very true if the virus will most likely mutate. and we will be back to square one. Immunity conveyed by a flu shot does not cover one from year to year due to mutation during the previous flu season. Hence yearly flu shots.

                      I was referring to a vaccine that would work on the present COVID19 virus strain. If the virus mutates which most do I am not sure but I thought once they have a vaccine it is easier to create another vaccine after it mutates.

            3. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Thanks for this Wilderness. I don't understand why those with Mike's view don't understand the threat here. It's not the mortality rate (though, that's part of it - it's not comparing mortality rates to the flu mortality rates). It's the impact on the health care system and our inability to stop the spread of the virus.

      2. peterstreep profile image81
        peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Ever heard about the word "exponential"?
        Imagine nothing was done to stop the Coronavirus. How many body bags do you think we would need in a year's time..
        The downplaying of this virus iin January can be seen as ignorance but not in March. Today having such a positive bias kind of thinking is killing people. Highly irresponsible.

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Indeed Peter, if people didn't self-quarantine and didn't avoid crowds the virus would have been lots worse by now. I don't know what Mike's thinking, but I'm glad there aren't more who look at the crisi in this manner.

          The stupid Governor from my state of Georgia has reopened the beaches against the wishes of those who live there. The moron only learned the virus could be passed by non-symptomatic people last week.

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/stupi … li=BBnb7Kz

        2. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          No one will ever know how many body bags. May not have been any more than some of our yearly flu. Our Government trusted the WHO, as well as our own CDC. Other than that Trump's timeline was very good in handling the virus. His statements were based on info he perhaps should not have trusted. The only fault I can see is the USA  pandemic stockpile was understocked.and have been fo many years. As for now, the death rate is low to what it could have been. It could be closer to the stats we see from yearly flu. The blame should be directed at China as well as the WHO and our CDC, as well as those responsible for our stockpiles. The president is doing a good job of getting equipment and supplied to where they are needed with good speed.

    2. paradigmsearch profile image60
      paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

      The most depressing article yet: https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/03/ame … perts-say/

      The article has 2 typos. There is no reward for finding them.

    3. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 4 years ago

      What is with Trump as this endless pitchman for this hydroxychloroquine stuff?

      He keeps saying that he "is not a doctor" but interrupts questions during press conferences directed at true professionals who are? He says that he does have common sense. But, if he had a lick of that, he would keep his mouth shut.

      Medical science's jury is still out on the safety and effectiveness of this drug. Why is Trump hyping it so? Is he aware that his promotions are taken seriously by the nation's lowest common denominator, many of his followers?

      People are dying and he can still only think of what benefits Trump and his expansive ego.

      I will have to verify the "rumor" that he has been going to Dr. Oz for advice, "the Wizard of Oz", world renown purveyor of snake oil and varied nostrums, as America's biggest quack. I am checking for the veracity of this story.

      He is a lousy President and an even worse human being and I have yet to be convinced otherwise.

      And now Tucker Carlson and the standard assortment of right wing clowns are trying to discredit Dr. Fauci as having an "agenda", affiliated with the "Deep State". Do America's right-wingers really think that the rest of us are so naive?

      1. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this
        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Perhaps, Sharlee, Trump would have more credibility if he works out his medical knowledge in conflict with DR. Fauci, before he faces the public. The evidence of the effectiveness of this drug is still inconclusive. I see no reason why Fauci would have reason to be duplicitous after 34 years on the job. Trump, not so much.

          I don't like the Trump attitude where his intuition is valued over the medical experts. His "happy talk" has consistently misled and misinformed as he seems to resist the science.
          ----------
          “It is reasonable to believe that chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate may be effective in treating covid-19,'' the FDA’s chief scientist, Denise Hinton, wrote in the letter granting emergency approval.

          Hinton’s letter did not cite specific studies or evidence the FDA used to support the decision.
          --------

          I heard stuff like this about peach pit derivative as treatment for cancer.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Dr. Fauci is one opinion. As you can see many Physicians in the Feild are using it, and are stating it appears to be helping in many cases. (See links provided).

            In regards to Trump's opinion about the drugs. He is known for giving his opinion. Not anything new. Some appreciate it, some don't. He appears to be a man that looks for the positive and does not tend to lean to the negative. It is your right to not like his attitude. Not sure why you feel he does not respect Dr. Fauci's input. He has listened to his input and suggestions on Mitigations, and the need to shut its country down. It was clear from the very beginning Trump leaned toward opening the country back up by Easter and has listened to the Dr. in regard to the need to keep it closed down. I think Trump has good respect for both Dr. on the task force.

            Many physicians around the world including the USA are using the drug and having good success. Although Dr. Fauci is well respected, he has one view to offer. I prefer to listen to Doc's that are in the field using the drug. This new virus offers little treatments, and I would leave the opinion to use the drug to the patient and their Dr. The "Right Tp Try' bill lets them have the choice to use a drug that is perhaps not a previously prescribed drug as well as drugs that have not completed studies.

            hydroxychloroquine sulfate. many people have taken the drug for arthritis, Lupus, etc.  It has been around since world war 11.  And can be purchased at one's local drug store.

            Your comparison od a "peach pit therapy just does not compare to a drug that has been around and used for many other health problems. Seems you are going to extremes.

            https://www.sermo.com/press-releases/la … n-context/

            In regard to Trump's "happy talk". You do realize there are people that tend to have personalities that always see the positive, and some that just always lean to negativity?  He is a president that is talking about a drug that doctors are using presently to help with the symptoms and actually showing good results. I have found offered several examples of the patient's personal experience with the drugs. Both feeling the drug saved their lives.

            If you were dying I take it you would not give this drug a try due to one scientist's opinion. Interestingly, it gives me a bit of insight on other's thoughts about this drug. Me, I would opt to go with the opinion. "What do you have to lose". you're going to die. Hey, I would even opt to use those peach pits if they showed some success.

            1. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              The danger here is that when you use one drug to treat one condition and then use that same drug to treat a totally different condition, you can have very unfortunate side effects, like death, which is why the medical community does not make recommendations based on anecdotal evidence.

              And Trump has been touting this as a cure, but its anecdotal use is very specific - with Zinc in extreme cases, not for mild cases. J.K. Rowling said a breathing exercise cured her, why not push that? Doesn't cost anything and anybody can do it. What about prayer? If God really cared about the people with COVID-19, wouldn't he stop this? Is it possible that COVID-19 is a punishment for our sins?

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Your statement gives me the opinion you feel you know more than the hundreds of physicians that have opted to use the drug as a first treatment due to witnessing good results on a virus that we have no real other meds that provide to same positive results. 

                As a nurse, I can assure you anyone with COVID is being provided with every respiratory therapy to help with the disease. These therapies are palliative, and do not deal with the cause of the condition.
                hydroxychloroquine is a drug that is having a positive result with the cure, not just palliative to alleviate symptoms. I regard to God, and his thoughts on the virus, I have no comment...

                https://www.sermo.com/press-releases/la … n-context/

                1. crankalicious profile image90
                  crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  So, as a nurse, if you heard that some doctor somewhere used some solution for a condition and you had a patient with that condition, you would try that solution before receiving any guidance or before any testing could be done or results produced across similar cases from other doctors?

                  If not, why? This person is a doctor and knows what he's doing.

                  1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    As a nurse, you are well aware I have no authority to prescribe any form of the drug. Your anology is not appropriate to the uses of this drug. I have offered several links that give good proof many physicians are already using the drug and having good results. Physicians are responsible to give the patient all the possible side effects as they do with all drugs. Are you insinuating the thousands of physicians that are using the drug are not suitable to prescribe or that they're not making their patients aware of side effects? Please read new guidelines for uses of hydroxychloroquine.

                    https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a … ch-30-2020

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/business … loroquine/

                    https://nypost.com/2020/04/05/ny-corona … rial-drug/

                    https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ … 094307002/

                    https://abc7news.com/coronavirus-drug-c … e/6079864/

                  2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    As a nurse, I have no right to prescribing medication or do I have an education that would be suitable to prescribe medication.

                    So, no I would not advise a patient or anyone on medication. If I was asked by a Pt to provide information on a drug, I would provide that information as an advocate.

                    Not sure if you're asking me if I would take a medication that was not FDA approved.  It would depend on my illness, my prognosis. If I was at death's door I might consider a medication that was under study but not yet approved. I would not take a med that did not have some studies to provide some results that were promising.

                    In regards to hydroxychloroquine, I would take it as a  prophylactic measure if I were working at this point.  This medication has been around for many years. I have a friend that takes it for Lupus, I have most likely as a nurse over my 25 years given it hundreds of times for different conditions. To include children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

                    I hope you have a look at my link. Doctors all over the world are prescribing the med to their patients for COVID19. and feel comfortable doing so.

      2. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        "People are dying and he can still only think of what benefits Trump and his expansive ego."

        He is desperate to find something, anything, that helps save lives and you claim he only thinks of himself?  TDS for sure!

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Follow the lead of the medical professionals as something/anything is the wrong advice.

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            He did, as I'm sure you are aware of.  The drug he's saying might help has several reputable doctors saying it DOES help.  Medical professionals that have tried it.

          2. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this
      3. Ken Burgess profile image71
        Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this



        Sigh, yes Credence, but as bad as Trump may be, the Democrats prove far worse over and over again.

        $25M for increase in House Representatives salaries, $50M for Museums, $75M for NPR radio, $75M to state art organizations, $75M to Smithsonian, $25M for Kennedy Center, $75M to National Endowment, $50M to illegals,

        Remember in November - this is what the Democrats focused on in the House, giving themselves a raise, this is why Relief was delayed for over a week as they rejected revision after revision... they don't care about the American people, just their power and their pay.

        And now Schiff and Pelosi are starting a new investigation into Trump, during this crisis, while he was dealing with it in January they were still trying to Impeach him... and now they want to investigate him, even though he dealt with it while they ignored it.

        The Democratic Party, all those in DC currently, are the biggest problem this country has... worse than Republicans, worse than Russians, worse than terrorists... they are either incompetent, or traitors to the American people, or a mixture of both.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC3VDhziVFc

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          "The Democratic Party, all those in DC currently, are the biggest problem this country has... worse than Republicans, worse than Russians, worse than terrorists... they are either incompetent, or traitors to the American people, or a mixture of both."

          You can swap the word "Democrats" with "Republicans" in your rant and it would make more sense to many of us, Ken.

          And again with the Youtube link?

        2. profile image0
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          The House did not give themselves a raise. That is just flat-out false. I bet much of the rest of your post is either false or misleading, but I know it doesn't really matter because you don't believe fact checkers, just certain dudes on youtube. Like I told my paranoid right_wing conspiracy theory pushing friend, I don't care if you think Bill Gates is an alien who started a global pandemic via 5G in cahoots with Chuck Schumer and Bono, are you staying home unless absolutely necessary, washing your hands, and wearing a mask?  ;-)

          1. GA Anderson profile image83
            GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            You are right, the House did not give themselves a $25 million raise in Pelosi's proposed bill. The statement was false—on its face.

            But, it is easy to see where that false spin came from. They did propose to give themselves $25 million in the coronavirus bill. *you can see where the spin came from.

                             HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
                                     SALARIES AND EXPENSES

            "For an additional amount for ‘‘Salaries and Expenses’’, $25,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2021, except that $5,000,000 shall remain available until expended, for necessary expenses of the House of
            Representatives to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, to be allocated in accordance with a spend plan submitted to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives by the Chief Administrative Officer and approved by such Committee:"

            Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress as being for
            an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.[/i]
            Source: Text of Democrat's Coronavirus House Bill - pg. 135

            It would take some more digging to determine what they planned to use that $25 million for, but since this was only a proposed bill, I am not that interested. I didn't even look to see if that same money was in the passed bill. But, it would make for some curious speculation if it wasn't.

            Hmm . . . I think I will check that out after all.

            GA

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Have fun. ;-)

            2. GA Anderson profile image83
              GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Well, here is an observation that seems ripe for speculation. I will save mine for last.

              It appears that the $25 million for the House in the Democrat's first 1400-page bill, was stripped out, (like the other Democrat 'wish list' of progressive proposals), of the final 110-page bill that passed.

              I saw a thread wondering about the "why" of a definition change regarding something on the CDC website. Now, I have what appears to be a bigger "why" question. Why wasn't that $25 House money included in the final bill?

              It is easy to assume, (rightly or wrongly), that many of the Democrat proposals in the first bill were stripped because they weren't related to our coronavirus emergency. It also seems hard to not assume that maybe the stripping of that $25 million House money was because it too wasn't related to the coronavirus emergency.

              So just what was that $25 million proposed to be used for? Was Ken's claim of a pay raise completely off-base? Was it to be a House slush fund for any legislator's expenses during this period?

              Something smells.

              Here is the text of the bill that passed: ‘Take Responsibility for Workers and Families Act’’

              GA

              1. Ken Burgess profile image71
                Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                So in effect 'pay raise' was inaccurate, 'slush fund without designation as to how it would be spent' may have been more appropriate.

                A $25 million funding allocation for the House was referenced in a version of the package proposed by House Democrats on March 23.

                That House proposal included $25 million for “Salaries and Expenses” for the chamber which would be “allocated in accordance with a spend plan submitted to the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives by the Chief Administrative Officer and approved by such Committee.”

                But the bill never said it was specifically for legislators’ pay raise.

                It was still there in later versions,  the $25 million funding for the House is included in the Senate version of the package, posted on March 25 by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The measure had been agreed to in principle by congressional leaders and the White House.

                Perhaps it was pulled out because there was so much attention to the Bill and the hold-up passing it, that they felt is might be politically unwise to pursue even a small $25 million money grab during such a high profile moment in history.

                1. GA Anderson profile image83
                  GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  You are right, that $25 million stayed in the bill through the 5th presented revised version of the bill. It just doesn't appear, (unless I missed it), in the final passed version of the bill.

                  Regardless of the direction of speculation, when combined with the stripping of other Democrat 'wish list' segments, I still say something about that $25 million smells.

                  I am inclined to view it as a House 'slush fund' grab that didn't make the cut.

                  GA

                  GA

                  1. crankalicious profile image90
                    crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Certainly we should be concerned about $25 million with no oversight. I also wonder why they have salaries and expenses on the same line. Seems like "expenses" should have its own line so they cannot make excuses or deflect about it being expenses and not salaries.

                    How do you feel about the $2 trillion dollar coronavirus fund that now lacks independent oversight?

                    1. GA Anderson profile image83
                      GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      The heading structure of "Salaries" and Expenses was uniform throughout the bill, with continuing text defining the generalities of the appropriations.

                      You may be right that it could be confusing, but I think it was just a "wording" thing.*

                      I have heard of the "no independent oversight" charge, mostly related to the business-related parts of the bill. It struck me as a Democrat whine and I didn't check into it. So I don't know what to think about it.

                      However, the wording for almost all of the separate appropriations was pretty much the same 'boiler plate' stuff. Some were very detailed in the application of the monies, but most were not. So I think a fair assumption might be that the appropriation disbursements were left to the leading agency to determine.

                      If that is a fair assumption, then it would seem rational to assume the same for the business-related money disbursements.

                      At this point, I don't have a problem with it and think it is just a Democrat charge. *shrug

                      *If you take a quick look at the bill—not a deep read—you will see what I mean about its "boiler-plate" construction.

                      GA

        3. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Cmon Ken, that is just more right wing rubbish.

          Well, from my experience the problematic people are the GOP, as for where the Russians are on this scale, somewhere above the Republicans. I told you a bit about my background, what makes you think that me or anyone like me are going trust Republicans? The only ones I see are Uncle Toms, Aunt Jemimas and assorted minstrel show characters in blackface. From experience and academic education, I know this system inside and out and I still have more than one bone to pick in regards to it.

          Republicans expressed interest primarily is to give away the treasury to the fat cats as quickly as possible with as little oversight as they can get away with. And I will be damned if I butter their bread at the expense of middle class and working people.

          But, I have expressed my complaint about Pelosi using the crisis to address the laundry lists of progressives. As, I have said before, this is not the time. But, I am not giving the Republicans a carte Blanche either.

          And understanding American history, it is easy to say that Trump will go down as America's WORST President.

          And I apologize profusely, that I cannot see your point of view from MY perspective, nor you being able to appreciate and understand my point of view.

          1. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Credence, thats fair and more importantly, that's honest.

            At the end of the day, I would support those who want to walk the path to move the country in the direction you want it to move in...

            If there was someone competent and trustworthy to move it in that direction.

            Since there is not, since the Democrats have proven far more incompetent, and far more callous to American's needs in these past two years... more importantly, since the DNC and its supporters denigrated and dismissed all true voices of character and change that were willing to offer themselves as the Nominee, I now see the Democratic Party as the #1 entity that must be dismantled.

            The corruption that allows Pelosi to be House Speaker, and Biden to be the DNC's Nominee, must first be outed, and if not, then the entire Party and its power in DC must be destroyed.

            The Democratic Party no longer represents anything that is positive for Americans.  Open Borders do not help American citizens (it does help the Democratic Party get votes, and it helps corporations get cheap labor), the ACA was never affordable or caring for hard working Americans, it is not at all like the Social Healthcare system of Canada or the UK, it hurts more people than it helps... it makes the Insurance Corporations and Pharma Companies even richer.

            When the Democratic Party is shattered, perhaps it can be rebuilt, perhaps it can be led by someone who will pioneer true change, but the likes of Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, they are relics of the worst of what DC has represented for the last 30 years and more... until they are swept out of power and replaced there will be no improvements for the people brought by the Democrats..

            1. dianetrotter profile image62
              dianetrotterposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Whom do you think would have made a better presidential nominee? Not a challenge - just curious!

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I am not a Dem. However, I think they have a candidate that is front and center presently, actually, if he were a snake it would have bit them... Gov. Andrew Cuomo.  I guess the DNC might have problems backing someone that has the same type of common sense Trump has, but a better way of expressing his ideas. I must say, Cuomo, would be able to go round after round with Trump. Biden, well not so much.

              2. Ken Burgess profile image71
                Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Well, I devoted an article to Warren, and one to Tulsi.  You can read those to see where I stood on them at that time.

                I rescind my support for Warren however, she proved false, or became a sellout, her attack on Bernie, among other recent decisions and actions, turned me from her.

                I didn't support Bernie and never would, some of the reason for that you can read in the Warren article.  However, Warren's attack on him, during the CNN debate was contrived and calculated, there was no reason for it other than her agreeing to do the DNC's bidding to try and stop his momentum... and that is something only someone who is beholden to the corrupt cronies in DC would do.

                I also came around to liking Andrew Yang, as it so happens the DNC did a character assassination on Tulsi, bringing out Clinton to disparage her and call her a Russian puppet.  And they marginalized Yang and later ensured he didn't have a platform in the later debates.

    4. paradigmsearch profile image60
      paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

      Our species is a mess.

      "Doctors Say Hospitals Are Stopping Them From Wearing Masks"

      https://www.npr.org/2020/04/02/82520020 … ring-masks

    5. paradigmsearch profile image60
      paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago
    6. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 4 years ago

      You gotta check out the Trump bot, bird brained, Bobsie Twins, "Diamond and Siik" with their claim that we all must expose our selves to one another in the open to obtain a form of immunity to the virus. Twitter shut them both down, straight away.

      Fox News have provided the strumpet pair with the standard 30 pieces of silver to mislead and betray everyone.

      And it has been shown to be a fact that Trump asked for medical advice regarding the "miracle drug" Trump has been pitching for from the celebrity quack, Dr. Oz, who was behind the Acai berry hype a few years ago. Seems that with each passing day the medical professionals including the CDC have been ever more reluctant to support the drug as an effective treatment for COVID-19.

      1. GA Anderson profile image83
        GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        I better get back to binging on the news Cred. With each passing day, I am hearing more and more support for the drug's use. So I must have missed something during my Science Channel hours.

        What do you think we will hear about it 14 days from now?

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          That's funny, GA, they both can't be true.

          I think that within 14 days the last ditch "cure" will be completely discredited. Remember, that you heard it here first.

          1. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Hi Cred,

            I think GA (and myself) are unsure as to what "cure" you are talking about.

            Trump touted hydroxychloroquine as something that could be used to treat Covid-19 but not "cure" it.

            He was suggesting this because:

            Mar 20, 2020 - Studies in China and France have examined the effectiveness of anti-malarial drugs, including chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine  that suggests the positive effects of hydroxychloroquine in reducing both the duration and symptoms of COVID-19 in combination with an antibiotic called azithromycin.

            Trump brought this up, Trump asked the FDA to fast track it and allow hospitals to try it (probably on their worst cases that had little other hope).

            Everything else you may have heard is fabrication and falsehoods fed by an out of control media that seems to be intent on spreading the hysteria rather than helping spread worthwhile information.

            As it seems, based on what I read here lately, that only those who tune into TV News on a regular basis seem to believe such crazy falsehoods.

            Although, to be fair, a recent article in the NY Times (in regards to Trump having stock in a company that makes the drug) are pushing fabrications and falsehoods to a level that should make even CNN envious.

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Why would the preponderance of Media be spreading falsehood, Ken?

              Is it possible that Trump is spreading the falsehoods, instead?

              What do you consider "worthwhile" information? Does it have to come from Fox or Breitbart?

              I give little to no credibility to any right wing oriented news outlet.

              Trump falls woefully short of true leadership in this time of crisis. Cmon, Ken, he basically is a jerk and you are not surprised that he is perceived this way?

              And when I think of what competent men as President did when their moment came, 9-11, or Pearl Harbor, Trump has been an embarrassment.

              As for hydroxychloroquine, there has been a lot of hype and most has been negative. No, I neither trust Trump nor believe anything he says without strong outside corroborating evidence to support It.

              Blaming Obama, now how cowardly is that?

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                President Trump is doing a wonderful job handling this crisis. If it were not for his action shutting our borders to China alone has save so many lives. He was criticized by the Dems, WHO and the bias left media for that very action. 

                You need to open your eyes to facts, your media is keeping you from the truth, and pounding you with lies.

                1. Sychophantastic profile image72
                  Sychophantasticposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Sharlee, I have been reading this forum from afar and following your posts. I totally agree that President Trump is doing a great job. I freely admit to watching Fox News because they're the only network that tells the truth about President Trump. I was brought up in a world where it's just impolite and wrong to criticize the President. Whether he's a Democrat or a Republican, he's our leader. All the Democrats want to do is bash President Trump while the Republicans want to solve this pandemic and get America and Americans back on their feet. President Trump has never said a false word about this pandemic and he's always putting Americans first.

                  Don't let the liars and TDS sufferers get you down. And don't be embarrassed about watching Fox.

                  1. Ken Burgess profile image71
                    Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Well said, I have faith that most Americans can see the reality.

                    Or as Lucas would say, its a Clown show:

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3TVmzwSuDA

                    1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                      Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      She was being sarcastic, Ken. You'd know this if you've had any experience with her posts in the past.

                    2. profile image0
                      PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Who is Lucas and why should anyone care what he says?

                  2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    I actually was making the point in my comment to CREDENCE2  that I actually do not watch "talk jocks" that would include Fox, CNN or MSNBC. I find all three pander to the unintelligent. Featuring nothing but what one might refer to as Hype or better yet Herd feed. They are what attributes to the Dumbing down of liberals.  BAH BAH   Open up wide...

                    1. Credence2 profile image80
                      Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      I resent that, conservatives are not exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer. Liberals will never be mesmerized to follow one man blindly without question...

                    2. Sychophantastic profile image72
                      Sychophantasticposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Oh, I'm so sorry. I just was so excited to find somebody who shares my opinion of President Trump, certainly the greatest President of the last 100 years. And certainly a man who realizes that America is for Americans. I guess I just find that Fox's view of Trump aligns with my own and the MSM's doesn't.

                    3. Ken Burgess profile image71
                      Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Shar, I think "unintelligent" is too harsh.  Easily manipulated or easily duped, would be more apt.

                      The 'you can fool some of the people all of the time' category of folk.

          2. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            It appears you hope this drug will not help people that are experiencing respiratory distress. In my view, this shows you just hope to be right... And could care less about anyone that is suffering. As if you hope for more death so you can be right. You lack empathy.

            Hopefully, you read the information I left for you in regards to the drug and take the time to read it.  No one is calling it a "last-ditch cure".  It's being used to denature the virus's effect on the lungs. It has anti-inflammatory properties that help inflamed lungs. Doctor's are having good results using the drug to help Covid19 Pts.

            It's clear you are getting your info from talk jocks. You need to do your own research. You sound ill-educated on the drug.

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Wow, he lacks empathy? I'm  sure all but the most craven of people would be happy to see this drug work for COVID-19 patients. However, the scientific evidence  is just not there yet.

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                And you are correct about scientific evidence in regard to its use in COVID cases.  Although there is good scientific evidence that it helps with many illnesses that cause different forms of inflammation. There are also many physicians that are using it right now because they feel it is beneficial to help with the symptoms of COVID.  This is one reason the Gov of New York, Mich, and many others have requested it for use in hospitals due to Physician requests.   

                So, yes you are correct as of yet there are no scientific studies that show it works in treating COVID.

      2. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Diamond and Silks twitter statement - "The only way we can become immune to the environment; we must be out in the environment. Quarantining people inside of their houses for extended periods will make people sick!"

        I don't see the word COVID19 or Coronavirus in the statement.

        And to be so rude to call them derogatory vulgar names is uncalled for. Oh, forgot you do this often and it's apparent you feel you have the right to do this,  and others must put up your comments.

        In regard to "Miracle drug"

        Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine
        Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of malaria, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, but preliminary research in human and primate cells suggests that the drugs could effectively treat COVID-19.

        A 2005 study found that chloroquine could quell the spread of SARS-CoV when applied to infected human cells in culture. SARS-CoV is closely related to the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and caused an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2002. Chloroquine disrupts the ability of the SARS-CoV virus to enter and replicate in human cells, Live Science previously reported. The cell culture studies of SARS-CoV-2 revealed that the drug and its derivative hydroxychloroquine undermine the novel virus' replication in a similar way.

        Doctors in China, South Korea, France and the U.S. are now giving the drug to some patients with COVID-19 with promising, albeit anecdotal, results so far. The FDA is organizing a formal clinical trial of the drug.

        As of Feb. 23, seven clinical trials had been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry to test whether COVID-19 infections could be treated with hydroxychloroquine. In addition, the University of Minnesota is studying whether taking hydroxychloroquine can protect people living with infected COVID-19 patients from catching the virus themselves.

        In one heavily referenced study, conducted in France, a small number of patients with COVID-19 received either hydroxychloroquine alone or hydroxychloroquine in combination with an antibiotic called azithromycin. The authors reported that detectable concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 fell significantly faster in the study participants than coronavirus patients at other French hospitals who did not receive either drug. In six patients also given azithromycin, this promising effect appeared to be amplified.

        However, the CDC noted that the small, non-randomized study "did not assess clinical benefit[s]" associated with the treatment; in other words, the study did not probe whether the treated patients were more likely to recover and survive their illness. Additionally, the agency advised that doctors should be cautious when giving either drug to patients with chronic disease, such as kidney failure, and especially those "who are receiving medications that might interact to cause arrhythmias.

        https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus … ments.html

        Uses
        Hydroxychloroquine is used to prevent or treat malaria caused by mosquito bites. The United States Center for Disease Control provides updated guidelines and travel recommendations for the prevention and treatment of malaria in different parts of the world. Discuss the most recent information with your doctor before traveling to areas where malaria occurs.

        This medication is also used to treat certain auto-immune diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis). It belongs to a class of medications known as disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). It can reduce skin problems in lupus and prevent swelling/pain in arthritis.
        https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-5482 … al/details

        https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a … ril-7-2020
        FDA
        "Diagnostics update to date:
        During the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA has worked with more than 270 test developers who have said they will be submitting emergency use authorizations (EUA) requests to FDA for tests that detect the virus."

        Perhaps you should take up your concerns about the uses of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate.

        This drug is saving lives. It has been around for many years and gives good results when used in many autoimmune conditions. FACT

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I apologize for that slip of the tongue regarding Diamond and Silk, but their actions were uncalled for and irresponsible.

          I have plenty of empathy, I don't like false hope and snake oil. I, too, look to the science as the guide and if there is not scientific evidence that it is effective, what is this all about? I want the truth and not hype. I am for making available anything and everything possible to stem the infections and body counts.

          You are a nurse on the front line, I presume as you say, and you are in a better position than I to evaluate the efficacy of this drug. But, science is science and at the end of the day, that is the only source and authority that I am interested in.

          Rather than more death, I want more truth something in short supply from this administration and its hatchet men (and woman).

          I don't trust this man, Trump, nor his supporters to do the right thing in regards to this crisis. So, I will just wait and see and hope for the best.

          In fairness, I will read your link and evaluate the information therein  and the sources in a critical manner, you would respect no less?

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I have throughout my career witnessed many that held on to false hope. What I felt was they did so to cope, sometimes just working their way through their fears slowly until they realized there was no hope.

            In regard to evidence, the only evidence we have is that many physicians are using it, and requesting more to treat PT. This only indicates that it may be working. We won't really know until some Docs step up and give us their opinions. Not sure why some journalist has not found this a story to pursue.

            I can't say why Trump is constantly talking the drug up. You claim you don't trust the president or anyone that supports him to do the right thing. I am not sure what you feel the president could have done any differently. I have researched the timeline and all he has done. It would seem he has done a very good job, from closing the borers, putting together a good task force, and pretty much closing the country down.

            The only downfall was that the pandemic stores were not up to pare. The fact is they have not been for many years. This could have happened to many of our past presidents. One thing at this point we will now have proper pandemic supplies stored, and most likely kept up.

            The president has handled getting supplies quickly. He has literally pulled out all stops. I am not sure what else you could imagine he should do.

            I am at this point retired but due to Michigan becoming a hotspot I have volunteered two shifts a week at this point I have not been called in.

          2. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I mentioned to another person who is so caught up in his hate for Trump he cannot see anything else, to disconnect from CNN and MSNBC and yes FOX as well... in general disconnect from Cable news alltogether.

            Find alternative sources of getting your news/facts:

            https://www.youtube.com/user/WSJDigitalNetwork

            https://www.youtube.com/user/EconomistMagazine

            https://www.youtube.com/user/AlJazeeraEnglish

            https://www.youtube.com/user/forbes

            There are a great many sources to get news/facts from... you DON'T get facts or truth from CNN or MSNBC you get propaganda, you get bias, you get programmed, you get duped into believing falsehoods.

            Until you figure that out, you will be an angry man pissed off at all the wrong people, for all the wrong reasons.

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Ken, seriously, why do you presume that I get my facts from the news outlets mentioned? It just seems to me that those that take a right wing view of things have access to the correct information and the rest of us are foolishly misled? I gather my information from a variety of sources. There are plenty of left wing oriented  posters here, are they all sheep as well?

              Short of your being there, your perception of events,heroes and villains is your opinion. Many of us differ from that and it is not because we are all uniformed as you imply. Conservatives are so hung up on absolutes, "I have to be right, so you must be wrong", well, there are not any, just differing and subjective opinion. Unless you were eyewitness to all you speak of, yours is just another opinion.

              Are the news sources you speak of really factual or do they simply express an opinion that corresponds with what you want to hear?

              Rest assured that I know exactly who and what I am pi$$ed over and why.

        2. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Alright, Sharlee, I read the portion where the FDA is working with all test developers. I see that,ok.

          We are in a state of desperation, try anything and everything. I have no problems with that. But we are not going to resume our normal lives by Easter, are we? Who said that?

          1. peterstreep profile image81
            peterstreepposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I don't think our lives will be the same ever again. Just like 9/11 had a huge impact on the western world. It changed security risks, global power struggles, and wars.
            The coronavirus will change the lives drastically as well. How I don't know. More work from home I guess. People who are now starting to work from home for their company could well be doing this after the crisis.
            There will be a recession. Thousands/millions of jobs are already lost. The production, transportation, and consumption will probably be different.
            The heavenly dependent oil industry is changing. Today solar power is cheaper than oil. Fracking is becoming too expansive. There is a lot of change in the fundamental structure of the world. The coronavirus could well be a blessing in disguise.

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I am concerned as the paucity in the marketplace these days is beginning to rise above mere inconvenience.

              Telework is fate of workers from my former Federal employer.

              I believe that the stimulus may prove to be inadequate to address the holes in people's pocketbooks.

              My brother picked up a new Tesla Electric motorcar. He said that he could obtain a 250 mile range with the equivalent of 4 dollars worth of electric energy. I am still incredulous, have to go to the Tesla sight to see it for myself. If it puts a dent in the fossil fuel industry to some extent , that has got to be progress.

          2. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I sort of feel if it were my choice I would almost rather take a drug that has proved safe for many other inflammation conditions than a brand new one that may have been rushed to market due to a new virus.  Being a nurse that has given Hydroxychloroquin to many per Dr orders, Pt some being children for juvenile arthritis I would rather go with it than a new drug with little testing.

            I think the media has concentrated on one aspect of the drug. The point that it has not been used for COVID19, ignoring it has been being used on all ages for some 75 years. If I had COVID19 it would be what I would take immediately at first signs or symptoms. 

            I agree we are not going to resume our normal lives by Easter. Hopefully. it will be soon.

    7. IslandBites profile image92
      IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

      COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, is now the No. 1 cause of death in the U.S. -- killing more people on average per day than cancer or heart disease.

      The virus is the cause of 1,970 deaths in the U.S. per day, according to a graph published Tuesday by Dr. Maria Danilychev, based in San Diego, Calif. In comparison, the graph shows 1,774 deaths per day are attributed to heart disease and 1,641 to cancer, according to Newsweek.

      Just a week ago, the graph, which cites the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Worldmeters.info as sources -- showed COVID-19 as the third leading cause of death, averaging roughly 975 fatalities per day.

      On March 22, it showed COVID-19's daily death rate starting to surge, passing flu and pneumonia and suicide, as well as liver and kidney disease.

      FOXNEWS

      1. Readmikenow profile image95
        Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        From the same article,

        While the death rate has increased, reports have shown hospitalizations have decreased in some areas of the U.S. Cuomo added that hospitalization rates in New York have slowed due to social distancing measures.

        "Our efforts are working," he said according to NPR. "They're working better than anyone projected they would work. That's because people are complying with them."

        Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci said Wednesday that based on newer data, U.S. deaths will be lower than the original projection of 100,000 to 240,000 total deaths. A decrease in daily death rates usually lags behind hospitalization rates."

      2. Ewent profile image58
        Ewentposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Trump knew about this virus in November and said nothing. He has blood on his hands because he never once allowed anyone to prepare for what has now become a pandemic.

        He only bothered to go public when the evidence of deaths from COVID-19 in Washington state went viral. Then the MAGGOT in Chief knew he could no longer ignore ALL the warnings even those from his own staff.

        This will never be a one party government. Come 2021, Trump will end up being the first occupant of the White House to go to prison. Which by the way he so richly deserves for HIS negligence that caused needless deaths.

        Instead of Benghazi, Benghazi Bengahzi, Now what goes around comes around..The Virus The Virus The Virus.

        As if any American who has suffered the deaths of loved ones need a reminder?

    8. IslandBites profile image92
      IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

      That's rich!

      For weeks, Trump was downplaying the threat of Covid-19. You and others here of course follow the lead. All of you see no fault in Trump, is everybody's fault except Trump. China, the media, Democrats, WHO, governors... who else?

      SMH

      1. Randy Godwin profile image60
        Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        "And if you want a test, you can get one." This was weeks ago and it's still a lie today. But who cares?

      2. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

        As did Nancy and Joe downplay the virus------  Nancy encouraged Americans to get out to restaurants.  The president formed his opinion on the information he was getting.  And yes, I blame WHO, and China for the problem that exists today. Not sure where you have gotten your opinion I have blamed the Dems, media, gov, etc.  I believe our government was not informed by China of the human to human spread and the severity of the spread, I also put some of the blame on WHO. They actually did not want to close our borders to China. That is a well-known fact. I can't speak for others, but I hope that clarifies my feelings in regard to who I direct some of the blame. what I have offered is factual.

        I have stated I think Trump is doing a good job. I have not defended or criticized his many comments some have found offensive. I find this disruptive and at the end to me should matter little at this point. In the end, I am looking for a crisis to be handled to help all involved. So, far I am very satisfied.  I think the president has provided those results.

        "All of you see no fault in Trump, is everybody's fault except Trump. China, the media, Democrats, WHO, governors... who else?"

        You seem to have taken it upon yourself to assume what I see...

        1. profile image0
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          We don't have to assume. You describe your complete trust  in and devotion to Daddy Trump quite eloquently.

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            "Daddy Trump?" That sounds kinda creepy, Sandy!  yikes

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Sorry, but that's what it seems like to me. Complete trust in the authoritarian father figure. I call it like I see it, Randy.

            2. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I thought so too... But to each their own.

          2. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            In the case of this crisis, I have claimed I  am very pleased with Trump's job performance.  It is your assumption "I have a devotion to Trump".  I have never made such a claim. This is where I have a problem with some that post here thought process. I can see some have the innate habit of taking a statement out of context and elaborating on its meaning. First I was responding to the subject of IB's comment.

            But, let me repeat what I expressed in the comment you have just replied to in my regard to how I feel about Trump's handling of the virus crisis. Not sure where you picked up I have devotion to the president from that statement.

            "I have stated I think Trump is doing a good job. I have not defended or criticized his many comments some have found offensive. I find this disruptive and at the end to me should matter little at this point. In the end, I am looking for a crisis to be handled to help all involved. So, far I am very satisfied.  I think the president has provided those results."

            Not sure where you ascertained I was showing "devotion" to the
            President, I was giving my honest opinion on the subject at hand.

            It is no secret I voted for Trump, and will again due to being very pleased with his accomplishment. No devotion, I am devoted to my husband, my family, my friends. The president I am just more than satisfied with his job performance.

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Okay.

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                So, why do you feel I am devoted to Trump? Why Why... LOL

        2. Ewent profile image58
          Ewentposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Who cares what the bottle blonde Ivanka wannabees find offensive? Trump is as illegitimate today as he was the minute Mommy  Mary Ann allowed him to exit the birth canal.

          It IS the job of a president to lead. That is what the financially dependent clinging vine women expected of Obama.

          Now, they want a money laundering grifter who thinks he is the "total" authority to dump HIS job on the governors?

          Why pay federal taxes for Trump to play golf every weekend and then refuse to part with federal funding WE OWN because WE paid those taxes?

          Why is it women who live in the moocher states have zero brains?

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Rant Much?
            First, let me reorient you to the subject of my post. I would have thought you would reply to the subject.
            I have made no mention of Ivanka,Trump's mother, Obama or dependent women. Nor did I make mention of Trump golfing.

            My comment was how Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden saw fit to handle the COVID19 crisis.  Trump stopped travel from China and weeks latter Nancy encouraged us all to get out enjoy restaurants and Join her in China Town, callingTrump a racist for stopping travel from China.
            https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/n … n/2240247/

            How about you respond to that... Facts are harder to swallow than CNN Bylines. 

            Tip -- You need to follow a conversation before adding your comment. What you posted was nonrelevant to the subject.

      3. Readmikenow profile image95
        Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        I hope everyone does realize the H1N1 virus of 2009 was just as bad and in many ways worse.  Nothing was closed.  I always have to question why it was no big deal then.  You didn't see it at the top of the news cycle or weeks.  Why is this so different from 2009?

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Because it's more contagious, Mike. DUH!

        2. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Just another opinion in the offing, Mike why do you think it is any different? You don't really think that the liberal press stirred all of this up and both Republicans and Democrats in Congress went along with the "pressure" to shut down, do you?

          Coronavirus, when compared with H1N1 has proven to be more contagious, having a higher rate of fatalities for those infected, match that with Trump lack of preparedness as opposed to how a similar event was handled under Obama, there is your answer.

          https://www.propublica.org/article/no-p … flu-either

        3. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I have already gone down that road. And as a nurse that worked that Flu, I can tell you plenty died, young and old. And we that worked it will never forget.  This virus will be around for a couple of years until a vaccine is developed. Itis not realistic to think we can protect the world from a virus by closing it down. It will return in the fall, and most likely the year after next. By then we will have a vaccine. We need to build immunity over time as we have to every other virus. Closing for a while decreased the death toll. And yet some continue to Blame Trump, the guy that shut it down... Go figure.  Wonder why the Government did not take H1N1 seriously, it killed children our most vulnerable. I just can't understand the logic of some.

          1. profile image0
            PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            What, exactly, did Trump shut down? Governors are the ones who took this seriously. My governor in Oregon shut down schools and issued stay at home orders while Trump was still minimizing the crisis. Did he issue orders I am not aware of?

            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I did not say Trump closed the country down. He did declare the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency on March 13, the exact day Your Gov, Bown ordered the schools to be closed as of Mon, March 15th.

              Yes, it is up to the Gov. to protect the residents of their state's health threats. It certainly appears due to the date Gov. Brown was quick to take the situation seriously at that point. It appears she lagged at making the decision to put out a stay at home order.

              March 23,
              "Days after saying she wouldn’t order Oregonians largely to remain at home to slow the spread of the coronavirus, Gov. Kate Brown did just that Monday." here is a link that gives an accurate timeline to what the
              The government has done to date.

              https://www.defense.gov/Explore/Spotlig … -Timeline/

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                "And yet some continue to Blame Trump, the guy that shut it down... Go figure."

                So what did he shut down?

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  The figure of speech. Caught the media bug. You know the one that keeps them constantly asking  Trump every day --- " when will you be opening the country" What date will you be opening the country". Will you listen to the doctor's when making your decision to open up the country"... Etc.

                  Trump has made it very clear he was leaving the decisions up to the Governors in regards to taking measures to protect their citizens.

                  And you know what, most of the Gov. did not issue a stay-at-home order until a couple of weeks after Trump declared the COVID19 virus a National Emergency. Yet many of the Dem gov are the first to make accusations about how Trump is handling the crisis.Sort of hypocritical.
                  https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/23/us/coron … index.html

              2. profile image0
                PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I guess I have a problem reading your posts. It seems I take your words to mean what they say. 

                "and yet some continue to Blame Trump, the guy that shut it down... "

                I read that to mean that Trump shut down the virus. Of course, that really hasn't yet hampered but pretty much all of the leadership and action has come from governors, not Trump.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  As I have pointed out before, you are not reading the sentence before and after. Doing this would provide you with the context of the comment. I must say kind of comprehension is an epidemic nowadays. It's what leads to fake news.

                  "Closing for a while decreased the death toll. And yet some continue to Blame Trump, the guy that shut it down..".

                  So, after reading my comment do you still think after me stating "closing for a while decreased the death toll". means I was trying to conveying shutting down the virus?

                  And as I just informed Randy most all of the Governors some only in the first week of April ordered their citizens to stay-at-home. In my opinion, this does not bode well for some Gov. Many did not heed the seriousness of the virus. No, the leadership has not come from governors, most had insufficient stockpiles equipment PPEs etc.  As did Trump...  But Trump pulled together a team worked diligently to do his very best to provide any state that needed help with not only needed "stuff" but had our Military build field Hospitals anywhere they were needed. Need I go on?  I provided you a link to a timeline, why not have a "look-see"?

                  Give credit where it's due or don't.

                  1. profile image0
                    PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Okay, if you're not saying Trump shut down the country, and you're not saying he shut down the virus, what are you saying he shut down?

                    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Let me use one of your favorite replies -- OK

                      OR--  Maybe we let this one go and wait for Trump to open it up. Because actually he will be the one that determines that too.

                    2. Sychophantastic profile image72
                      Sychophantasticposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Why are you being so dense? President Trump provided the leadership this country needed. He saw through the lies China was putting out and cut off travel from China. That told the governors all they needed to know - which was that the virus was going to get into the U.S. other ways. So the governors saw how seriously President Trump was about this spread of the virus and they began issuing stay-at-home orders. And then when the MSM started questioning him about how serious he was, he shut them down too with his total awesomeness.

                  2. IslandBites profile image92
                    IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Media... check!
                    Democrats... check!
                    WHO... check!
                    China... check!
                    Governors ... check!

          2. IslandBites profile image92
            IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            "just as bad and in many ways worse"

            In which ways?

            And I dont know about that "just as bad".. The declared global deaths of H1N1 were 18k (200+K if you use the estimates). And that was after a year. In less than 4 months we have 100+K declared deaths. We'll have to wait for the estimates.

            It was a big deal, and schools closed. It was constantly on the news. But you're right is different now. Covid-19 is more deadlier.

            Right now, USA alone has the same amount of deaths as the declared global deaths of H1N1.

            But keep peddling.

        4. Ewent profile image58
          Ewentposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Do tell? When has any President EVER had the disgusting gall to DARE to prescribe drugs his doped up liquored up supporters now want to kill off more Americans with?

          If Trump supporter want to martry themselves for their savior Trump, go right ahead. Just don't expect a grand memorial.

          People who are already on legally prescribed drugs for diabetes and other illnesses are NOT going to obey Trump.

          Why should we? He owes us. He and his grifter family are on OUR federal tax dollars. If we pull those federal tax dollars, we get to watch him and his controls freak insider government die a painful moneyless death.

      4. GA Anderson profile image83
        GA Andersonposted 4 years ago

        Coming from someone who routinely criticizes sources, your comment is, as Island Mom might say, 'Rich. . . '

        First, you have tagged your comment to a statement from Ewent that has been repeatedly debunked:

        "Now we find out that the reason he delayed the testing kit dispersals was to get his own crony company he has investments in to do the manufacturing."

        Unless you doubt the authority of Politifacts or Snopes, you can check them out to see how the original social media posts' and ewent's claims were determined to be bogus.

        And then . . you provide an Esquire link as an authoritative source to support your reasoning. *SMH

        With the exception of an included Politifacts article quote, here is the entirety of you explanatory source:

        "The most consequential—and logically inexplicable—decision taken by this administration* in response to the current pandemic occurred in January, when German scientists developed the first test for COVID-19 and the World Health Organization offered the test to countries around the world and 60 countries accepted. We were not one of them. From Politico:

        . . . PolitiFact's blurb . . .

        "Let’s guess why this happened, and let’s leave aside for the moment that Jared Kushner’s brother runs a company that’s involved in testing, because that should not be any kind of surprise. What I’m fairly convinced is also behind that decision is the administration*’s disdain for international organizations, alliances of any kind, and foreigners in general. Couple that with the Republican Party’s similar xenophobic impulses and overall dislike of any science that can’t be replicated with baking soda and Fizzies, and you’ve got a pretty good reason why help from overseas is more terrifying in many minds than viruses from overseas are. American exceptionalism now means “except us.” That’s not a good development."


        Just for kicks I emphasized your author's word choices that filled me with confidence in their authoritative knowledge.

        And that is your measure of a source worth believing? Geesh, you outdid yourself on this one Randy.

        Will you be offering unsupported forum opinions that you agree with as trustworthy sources next?

        [EDIT ADDED] *Since I only spent about 15 minutes checking this out, it is possible I missed something and may have to eat my words, so I will keep the mustard handy until I hear from you. ;-)

        GA

        1. profile image0
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          "Will you be offering unsupported forum opinions that you agree with as trustworthy sources next?"

          Would it be any worse than Lucas from YouTube‽ ;-)

          1. GA Anderson profile image83
            GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I will have to go back and check out that "Lucas" link before I can answer that. Until then, I am left wondering about Randy's dive into Esquire. I know what they used to be known for . . . 

            But of course, I only looked at their magazines for the articles. ;-)

            GA

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Don't you remember, GA, Esquire was a men's oriented monthly with only interesting articles not a cheesecake glossy, like say Playboy?

              1. GA Anderson profile image83
                GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Maybe I have my magazines mixed-up. ;-)

                GA

        2. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Yep, I broke my own rules, Gus. I was in a rush to go somewhere and took the first two sites on the search. I'll cut off another finger!  yikes

      5. Readmikenow profile image95
        Readmikenowposted 4 years ago

        https://hubstatic.com/14961351.jpg

      6. hard sun profile image79
        hard sunposted 4 years ago

        Here's a starter list of some of the allegations against Trump, including those that made it to the courts. Hell, his own wife accused him of rape under oath!

        https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/was-d … -election/

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I have seen each allegation against Trump., who hasn't would be a better question.  My question stands. Will you vote for Biden?  Or do you feel  --- Hey, there is one allegation of rape no biggie?

            I realize this allegation might have most Dems sticking their fingers in their ears. Not taking Trump here, talking about Biden. Let's stay on the subject.

          1. hard sun profile image79
            hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            So, by your logic, Trump should just be guaranteed President beyond 2020 as anyone can make an accusation against a candidate, of which Trump has been accused of much worse for decades, and that makes the candidate ineligible to vote for??

            The logic is entirely faulty.

            1. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Every Democrat I know is going to vote for Biden reluctantly because there's no other choice. Not a single Democrat I know is excited about the prospect of voting for him.

              1. hard sun profile image79
                hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                The concept of lesser of two evils seems to have suddenly been lost by some.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Not lost by me ---  But I never rode on that high house or stood atop of that pedestal. Got to be hard when the tables ten. Where are all the morals, the loudly expressed values? LOL

                  1. profile image0
                    PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    One very big difference is that Trump freely admitted--actually, he bragged--about assaulting women. Also, one allegation versus sixteen (?).

                    But, I know none of this matters to you. You Trumpers now have years of experience rationalizing, blaming, and diverting.

                    As many of us warned early on, the bar has been lowered, standards long gone. Values? What are those?

                    Y'all really have some nerve.

                  2. IslandBites profile image92
                    IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    Does that means you didn't have any to begin with?

                  3. hard sun profile image79
                    hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    You're still pounding on the same nonsensical drum. Trump is not  for office for MANY reasons..not just cause he's a pervert. I rest my case that you seem so adamant that needs to be made.

                    Are you attempting to feel better for your vote for the loony conman? It was a bad decision. It doesn't mean you're a bad person. You can clear your conscience by voting against him, or you can continue they cycle of confusion, dread and excuses by voting for him.

                    And now you start with the name calling. If I were to call you a hypocrite, you would feign outrage and victimhood, you've done it to me...just as Trump does.

                    America needs morality not Trump and his campaign of division...anything to fire up the base to get votes. You are on the wrong side of history.

                    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                      Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      I am bot attempting to feel better. I have always been truthful of why I voted for Trump, and also that I am very in the end satisfied with my choice. he has done a great job from the moment he walked into the office.

                      1. hard sun profile image79
                        hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                        Keep telling yourself that. However, it's better to confront the demons. I'm confident that most mental health professionals agree on that.

                    2. Live to Learn profile image60
                      Live to Learnposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Wrong side of history?  What are you? Nostradamus?

                      1. profile image0
                        PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                        It doesn't take Nostradamus to predict how Trump and his rabid base will be viewed through the lens of history, just eyes, ears and a brain.

              2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Is it not just a bit hypocritical?  I mean some of us made the same claim three years ago. LOL

              3. wilderness profile image94
                wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Sounds like 2016 revisited, when so many Republicans voted Trump because there was no other choice.  And Democrats countrywide condemned them for it because there was another choice - the best choice in the history of presidential elections!

            2. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I never said anything about who should be president. I guess I need to be blunt due to my comment is certainly not conveying what I am trying to say.

              So, now the Dems have a candidate that has a vile sexual allegation hanging over his head. Will they dance about and make what they see as logical excuses for Biden. Biden now has one of the very attributed they bashed Trump in the head with.

              My question was simple, and you have already become the face. Trump did this, Trump did that, and more of it. ARE YOU GOING TO CONSIDER VOTING FOR BIDEN?

              1. hard sun profile image79
                hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I thought we were done. Lesser of two evils...maybe google the phrase.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  I see you want to take the easy way out. I guess I will wait a bit to see who you support in the next election.  I wish I could make a bet...

              2. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Trump has set the bar so low, even you Trump enablers should see this. You're griping about the same thing you ignored from Trump, Shar?

                You yourself should understand why Biden is still preferred by the Left. You voted for a guy with multiple accusations of sexual assault, but don't see why others would do the same.

          2. IslandBites profile image92
            IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            How deep did you have yours?

            lol SMH

          3. Ken Burgess profile image71
            Ken Burgessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            It is apparent, there is a small select portion of the population, the same portion that still tunes in to the likes of CNN and MSNBC and actually believes they put forth truth and facts (they don't, its all opinion, bias, and misinformation)… that will vote for who-ever the Dems put up.

            Senile, Pedophile, Criminally Corrupt and a traitor to America... they do not care, they will vote for Biden or who-ever is presented as their "salvation" from the oppressive, evil dictatorship of the Russian puppet Trump.

            You'll have more luck convincing the Ayatollah Khomeini that Israel has a right to exist, than you will convincing these folks that Trump hasn't been the worst President in all history.

            1. Randy Godwin profile image60
              Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              History will tell the tale Ken. Certainly not you or I...

            2. crankalicious profile image90
              crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I would think senility is a trait that would appeal to more than a few people in this forum.

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                Cheap shot...

        2. Readmikenow profile image95
          Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          The key words is "Allegations."  Doesn't really mean anything.  In the article you provided the one woman withdrew the lawsuit.  Seriously?

          1. hard sun profile image79
            hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I'm not the one that started this discussion Mike. But, it's clear you will always step in to defend your hero.

            1. Readmikenow profile image95
              Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              To be honest, obama supporters dismissed his allegations in much the same way.  There have been books about the allegations against obama.  The cry from the left was always "they're just allegations" and just laugh them off.

              "The biggest untold story of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election... Finally, the no-holds-barred, 100% true story of Barack Obama's use and sale of cocaine; his homosexual affairs and the December 23, 2007 murder of Barack Obama's former lover and choir director of Obama's Chicago church of 20 years, Donald Young, just days before the 2008 Iowa Caucus. This searing candid story begins with Barack Obama meeting Larry Sinclair in November, 1999, and subsequently procuring and selling cocaine, and then engaging in consensual, homosexual sex with Sinclair on November 6th and again on November 7, 1999. You'll read in riveting detail how Sinclair, in 2007, repeatedly contacted and requested that the Obama campaign simply come clean about their candidate's 1999 drug use and sales. You learn how the Obama campaign, David Axelrod and Barack Obama used Donald Young (the homosexual lover of Barack Obama) to contact and seek out information from Sinclair about who he had told of Obama's crimes and actions."

              https://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Lar … 0578013878

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                lol Mike, read a bit more about the guy you're using to smear Obama.

                https://www.huffpost.com/entry/obama-ac … sv16_mcN9S

                1. Readmikenow profile image95
                  Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  So, the left automatically believes anything said about President Donald Trump and treats every allegation as if it is fact.  So, my point is he's not the only president who has had false allegations made against him.  This is just the short list of allegations made against obama.  Maybe, the left needs to learn allegations are not facts.

                  1. profile image0
                    PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    As I keep reminding everyone, Trump has bragged about assaulting women and intentionally walking in on undressed teenage girls. That means he is a sexual predator according to the one person--besides the victims, of course--who would know without a doubt: Donald Trump himself.

                2. Readmikenow profile image95
                  Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  So?  The point is the left treats every allegation made against President Donald Trump as if they are true and factual.  He's not the first or last president to have allegations made against him.  The left needs to learn how the allegations made against President Donald Trump have as little substance as those made against obama.  To be honest, this is the short list of allegations made against obama.  See, those on the right aren't gullible enough to believe such things.  It's obvious the same can't be said for those on the left.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                    Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                    You really don't care where you get your "facts" from do you, Mike? As long as it fits your idea of the truth....

                    1. tsadjatko profile image73
                      tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      If that’s not projection I don’t know what is!

                      Mike,

                      Randy’s projection just confirms what you said, “See, those on the right aren't gullible enough to believe such things.  It's obvious the same can't be said for those on the left.”

                    2. Readmikenow profile image95
                      Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                      Randy is accusing me of acting like a Democrat...how insulting.  I'm simply trying to illustrate how Democrats on the left act.  Funny...how when you put a mirror in the face of Democrats on the left...they can't see themselves.

                      1. tsadjatko profile image73
                        tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                        It would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic!

                      2. Randy Godwin profile image60
                        Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                        lol Not accusing you of anything but using crappy links for your "facts," Mike. Do you ever check out the veracity of them? Obviously not!

                3. crankalicious profile image90
                  crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Wow. The parade of nutty responses continues. Now we have our facts coming from Lucas, a guy on YouTube, a self-published book that nobody has read and has absolutely zero legitimacy in even the most ridiculous fantasy world, and Donald Trump’s own re-election web site. I think we all know what truth comes from such sources.

          2. profile image0
            PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Yes, and some of those allegations describe exactly what Trump bragged about doing. He brags about assaulting women.

      7. hard sun profile image79
        hard sunposted 4 years ago

        Plus, you just wrote "I am not aware of any criminal charges being filed on Trump for sexual abuse"

        So, once again, where's the logic? Are you are aren't you aware of all the Trump sexual abuse allegations. Some of them certainly made it to the courts as criminal charges.

        And, actually, the thread topic is coronavirus.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Actually there have never been any criminal charges brought against Trump for anything. There was a mother that initiated a lawsuit that claimed her daughter was raped by Trump, and she dropped the case. and dropped.

          I think you know where I was going with this conversation. Just getting the jump on hypocrisy. 

          And it was not me that brought up the subject it was Sychophantastic. Although I have subsequently started a thread on the subject.

      8. profile image0
        PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago

        Typical Trump supporter nonsense: weird twisted logic; laughable accusations of hypocrisy. Unbelievably nutty. Very much like Trump himself.

        1. hard sun profile image79
          hard sunposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Yup...it's not hard to understand how he got his support. Wow.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I am still asking will you support Biden?  Wow

            Seems you can't answer that question without making yourself a hypocrite.

      9. profile image0
        PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago

        Can I just say that copying and pasting such a huge amount of text is unnecessary and makes the thread extra annoying to scroll through, especially when multiple people reply to it.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Well maybe stop and read it. You might be pleased with some of the actions that are being performed. Or you could research it for falsehoods as Crank is doing.

          1. crankalicious profile image90
            crankaliciousposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I got my facts at HiilaryClinton.com so you know they’re true.

            There is also a girl I watch on YouTube named Trina.

            And a guy who lives in a cave who self-published his own book that says Trump is a Martian.

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              big_smile

            2. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Prove just one thing that is untrue on the list. I need not results in insults, you are making my point very clear.

        2. GA Anderson profile image83
          GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          I will second that. My scroll finger is plumb wore out.

          GA

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I wanted to provide some evidence of what our Government is doing to make every attempt to get us all through this very bad period in our history. Just me, but I am over listening to all the "he said this" and how could he say that".  I just wanted to impress -- "He did this" and He did that". 

            Read it, it's sobering. In fact, it's history and shows this president can truly solve problems, not just talk about solving them. His mouth gets him in trouble. But his innate talent for solving problems is what he will be remembered for. Just saying...

            1. GA Anderson profile image83
              GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I wasn't criticizing your post Sharlee, it was extensive and comprehensive. I was just agreeing with PrettyPanther that direct responses that quoted it made for a lot of scrolling to get to subsequent comments.

              It is an HP coding thing—we used to be able to snip quoted responses, their text was included in the response box—that should be reestablished. In the past I frequently used the <snipping> to delete multiple memes in comments I would reply to.

              GA

              1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                GA, Oh no I did not think you where criticizing at all.  And yes it was lengthy.  As a rule, I just post links to info. I just did not seem to be doing the trick this time around. I guess my weariness is showing.  I promise I will not ever do it again.  So sorry.

      10. paradigmsearch profile image60
        paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

        Here is a barn-burner of an article concerning our USA medical system and more. It is not pretty. https://www.theguardian.com/news/databl … y-covid-19

      11. Readmikenow profile image95
        Readmikenowposted 4 years ago

        https://hubstatic.com/14964884.jpg

        1. Randy Godwin profile image60
          Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Do you think Trump knows about medicine, Mike?  I never considered Greta an expert on the climate, and don't know anyone personally who did.  Not even a good try.....

          1. tsadjatko profile image73
            tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Then tell us Randy just what do you think she is?

            The Cabal's puppet given mass exposure to sell their agenda?

            That fits doesn’t it.

          2. Readmikenow profile image95
            Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Well Randy, you are one of the few on the left who didn't make that 16-year-old girl the most brilliant climate change authority on the planet.  She spoke at the UN on climate change.  It couldn't get any more ridiculous.

            "Her influence on the world stage has been described by The Guardian and other newspapers as the "Greta effect".[9] She has received numerous honors and awards including: honorary Fellowship of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society; Time magazine's 100 most influential people and the youngest Time Person of the Year; inclusion in the Forbes list of The World's 100 Most Powerful Women (2019)[10] and two consecutive nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize (2019 and 2020[11])"

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greta_Thunberg

            1. Randy Godwin profile image60
              Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I admired her stand on climate change, but I think it was also about a young girl with asperger syndrome speaking to the powers-that-be which gained her the most notoriety.

              Since you are probably a science denier as far as climate change goes, I can understand why you don't like Greta and her stand.

              1. Readmikenow profile image95
                Readmikenowposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                "Science Denier" you and everyone who thinks that way are funny to me.

                So, you believe in man-made global warming?  What are you doing about it? Still use gas to run your car, generator, farm equipment?  You're killing the planet.  Still eating beef?  You're killing the planet.  Still using things that depend on fossil fuels?  Things like rubber, plastics, glass, etc.?  You are killing the planet.  Go ahead and say I believe in man-made global warming.  Good.  Now, if you start living your life like you believe in man-made global warming I may do something other than laugh.

                Greta flying all over the world to accept awards...burning massive amounts of fossil fuels and dumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.  She's killing the planet. 

                The only thing I admire about Greta is her ability to be such a successful hypocrite to the masses of gullible people who have more emotion than brains.

                That pretty much describes the left.

                1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                  Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  "Go ahead and say I believe in man-made global warming.  Good."

                  Is this a yes or a no, Mike? I do believe we've contributed to the advance in world temps with the use of fossil fuels and deforestation. I don't believe the problem can be solved overnight either.

                  In India and other parts of the world people can see the sky again as the virus is shutting major industries down and the smog and air quality has improved vastly.

                  Not suggesting we need to totally shut down all industry, but some hurt the environment worse than others. Coal being an example.

                  As far as your description of the Left goes...sticks and stones and all that $hit. tongue

                2. IslandBites profile image92
                  IslandBitesposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Greta flying all over the world to accept awards...burning massive amounts of fossil fuels and dumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.  She's killing the planet.

                  Are you sure?

      12. Randy Godwin profile image60
        Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

        Anyone catch the propaganda video Trump played at today's coronavirus briefing? It was like this was a campaign rally to bolster Trump personally. He was rude and dismissive as usual, but it seemed he was extra teed off at the questions today.

        1. tsadjatko profile image73
          tsadjatkoposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Rude and dismissive? You sound proud like that’s something he learned from you, which actually is believable.

        2. profile image0
          PrettyPantherposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          We missed The Trump Show yesterday but figured it must have reached new heights of awful based on some of the news coverage.

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Clips mostly from Fox News with Sean and Laura making excuses for his tardy actions re the virus. With cherry picked clips from reliable sources as well.

      13. paradigmsearch profile image60
        paradigmsearchposted 4 years ago

        Has an interesting map of the U.S. Covid-19 outbreak, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/14/imf-glo … virus.html

      14. Ewent profile image58
        Ewentposted 4 years ago

        Sure Why not? Isn't that what Trump does too when he knows he is lying and is confronted with irrefutable FACTS we KNOW we can prove?

        There is an old saying, if you don't want a response, don't speak.

      15. Ewent profile image58
        Ewentposted 4 years ago

        Meanwhie, NHK (Japan's TV media) has reported a second wave of Coronavirus outbreaks in China and Japan. But to Trump that doesn't matter.

        The thug in chief can't play golf because his resorts are all shut down. So now he is "total authority" in violation of the 10th Amendment that gives states' rights to states over the Federal government.

        I love to do anything and everything that will drive Trump close to the edge if he is not already there. That is how you get rid of someone so evil only evil people support him.

        1. Credence2 profile image80
          Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Ewent, are you on a roll or what? Did someone put something in your coffee this morning?

          The only "Constitution" Trump cares about is his own.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Glad she is one of yours...

            1. Credence2 profile image80
              Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

              I am too, because she is "spot on".

              1. Randy Godwin profile image