When speaking of intellectually challenged individuals, how do you feel about these terms: mentally retarded; retarded and mental retardation?
I don't think intelluctually challenged has anything to do with real mental retardation or the mental disorders that now have specific names. I would rather use a specific name if needed to identify the disability, not the person. the person is not the disability/disorder.
to me when I hear the term intellectually challenged, I think of people who no longer think for themselves. people who don't really form their own opinions but follow the status quo or whatever so and so says..
Intellectually challenged; mentally challenged broad terms I know. But I prefer them even though many people think they just clean up the language.
I have a huge problem with a person being called retarded - but I can understand why the term mental retardation is kept alive: it's singles out a particular issue and provides a focus for funding or other help that this group of people may need.
I think it can be offensive to some extent. The plain word "retard" I would find most offensive though. I think mentally challenged is the best way to word it.
Are you referring to the Tea Tards by any chance?
Those are fairly descriptive and exactly explain whomever you are describing, but this then becomes a label, something to categorize and that to me is not really fair, whatever happened to everyone using their name instead of being labelled as whatever!
I hate politically correctness and all it stands for, especially when we should be free to think and say what we want!
My names Wayne, not ginger pubes!....breath.....and relax!!!!!
Those are old terms. I don't like them. I say, challenged and when I want to be really clear I say, mentally challenged.
yes we don't need to 'diagnose' everything and everyone........
MM i need you, im scared of you like that It's going okay i hope! ahhhhhh sorry looked at avatar again LMAO
change is hard, I'll get use to it one step at a time
purged tons in my last two 'challenged' hubs, issues arose but thrilled I am discussing this on a worldwide web with you
ask me if I care
oh, business and fun always - will email you this year! ok this week, girl cant catch up, but feeling powerful with MM to the rescue. Bet you get to rescue tons of hot guys
Politically correct doesn't create weak people Cagsil - it gives a foundation of respect for people who may not be linked to "normal" genes. And I want to make it clear that I think the conceptt of normal is waaaaay overrated and probably non-existent.
Now having said that, the problem in my opinion with worrying about politically correct terms is that while we may use the term, if we still treat the person as if they are a pimple on society's butt, what good are we doing?
Most of the 'old' terms get superceded because what they name is used in a denigrating way and so the word gets that negative connotation. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with retarded except its use as an insult. Same goes with black, homo, the short form of homosexual, even pleb the short form of plebian.
Challenged is vague and an almost irrelevant description that could be seen as actually insulting for someone who is different. Most 'challenged' people are not challenging anything, they are happy to be left as they are in my experience. Just to illustrate the problem.
You know, sometimes I read your comments and I scream at my computer, "NOOOOOOOOOO, YOU ARE WAYYYY TOO INTELLIGENT TO BELIEVE THAT!" And then I see comments like this and a few in the last few threads I've run accross your remarks in and I realize why I still respect you even though sometimes I think you miss it all.
I haven't heard those terms used in public in years.
"People with intellectual disabilities" is the terminology used by the Special Olympics. Seems like a good standard to me!
We have quite a few mentally challenged people in the forums (especially recently).
Present company excepted, of course.
The best way to find out, would be to ask a person who has the disability. Then you will find the answer. Unless of course someone here speaks up and who happens to have the disability.
'they' are constantly speaking up in these forums, they are seriously intellectually challenged and they can be found spouting retarded right wing christian views constantly in the religious forums.
Here is an instance where you need specific labels. Mentally Challenged is not going to cut it here.
Retarded = lack of brain developement
Brain Damaged = lack of mental ability due to brain injury.
Mental disease = Seeing and hearing dead people.
Kimmy! So lovely to see you!!!
If anyone dare make disparaging remarks about you in ANY way you just send them to me and I'll smother them with my MM cape!!!
It's been an exceptionally exhausting day here on the old HP forums, Kim. You know AP doesn't usually get perturbed, but today has even tried his patience!
But you're here now, so let's have some fun!!!
kewl, lets go
I feel a thread coming on......
Hah !! Wasn't the last one you started about everyone getting to bitch about everyone else - and when I played you buggered off and left me facing the wrath of the sith on my own !
Well, a good for instance is saying that the world needs to learn to practice "tolerance." OH, I see - so you are only willing to go to the extent that you "tolerate" my presence. But what are you, then - too wise to understand me? Too good? Too, I don't know - INTOLERABLE?
It may be better to be intolerable in the sense that it generates the impetus through which others seek to understand others - the intolerable. I am finding that the greater degree of communication (whether good or bad you can discern) here in the forums takes place between believers and "non-believers" - to an extent both are intolerable... but I understand the Atheists' intolerance of an idea that they are awaiting a voice from the sky on, yet, I cannot tolerate the notion that the only problem in the world comes from Faith communities - an idea put forth by the Atheists in which, they are being anything but politically correct . In fact, are they not calling believers IDIOTS?
They often DO have good reason, but it only perpetuates a sentiment from the Right that creates more discord. That is not particularly Intelligent.
We should tolerate pain, but not what causes more of it - so the Atheists and the Believers should really attempt to understand one another.
Finally - friends - I understand the Believers are often suffering, as are the Atheists - most of all at the hands of one another. And I understand God to be something more than what we can imagine, unless we imagine that IT would never hold us accountable for being all the more intolerant of hating one another. Both the "know" and the faith camps have their good and bad points - understood! But both can be RET@^&E.D. N@$$&#S and CR$#%^@S etc, etc...regarding the heart and soul of us all. GET OVER THE POINT BEING MADE!
Is that not "politically" correct - or am I just being intolerable? Understand?
E.D. - erudition deprived... we should all include ourselves in this HUMAN RACE(ial) SLUR...
AND JUST SO WE ARE ALL CLEAR AS A CHURCH BELL - I HATE THE USE OF ALL THE TERMS USED TO MAKE THE POINT...$%^&*(*&^%^&*(*&^%$%^
Hi - brand on heath tart -
What on earth are you ranting about ?
and why is the rant directed at me ?
and why is your name CAPITALISED, it is very annoying.
You're having a hard time understanding what he said?
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Good morning 'one-line Jim' how appropriate you being here in this thread
Hey Alt P
Have you noticed that the right wing christians are really getting to grips with irony?.
Keep on keeping on brother our work here is thriving :-)
AltPoet - it's not directed at you - cross my heart....
"You" as used in the "rant" is general, but not specific... "you" is as much me as is much anyone.
Loved the Dimitri Martin use of my name, by the way Brand ON ....
I often write as much with pen and ink as I do with the keyboard. I happen to write all caps when I print my name...it just carries over so I don't lose my own connection to the passe P&I format. And I am sorry that it annoys you, but never is what I write either ad hominem, or rant, non sequitor jargon.
If I attack anyone, it ought to be me, hence, "YOU" is used like a conversation in the mirror - "WHAT IS THIS BUT MY REFLECTION? WHO AM I TO JUDGE OR STRIKE YOU DOWN?" _ mjk
I am mentally challenged and I hate being called that. I am deslexic, ADHD, Polish, nearsighted, blonde and female. I believe that qualifies me. You can call me whatever you like, but hurt my feelings and I'll cry.
Being blonde and Polish is just a challenge for your lucky man !! ADHD and dyslexic are not mental disorders they are little things given you by the chance of nature to make your life intersting. Being a nearsighted female just makes it easier for guys to get close to you and makes you popular, the only problem I see in your list is that you are a woamn - which could be classed as a disorder - women always want dis in order, dat in order and will never understand that men want their heap of stuff kept in dis order !!
I happen to know one of the developmentally disabled individuals behind the "Ban the R word" campaign, here in New Jersey. When speaking clinically, we usually use DD where it applies. The problem with the "R" word is that it is almost always used as a pejorative. If you asked my friend, he'd probably just want to be called Bill.
I don't really think it matters. Give it a few years and whatever term we decide to use now in polite conversation will have the same negative connotations as all the others.
In the "biz" they say "people with disabilities" not "disabled people." So those whose disabilities are brain-related are termed "people with intellectual disabilities."
I personally don't think the word "intellectual" is either accurate or appropriate.
Call me a snob, but it sounds like we're talking about someone who couldn't get into Harvard.
"People with learning disabilities" or "people with mental disabilities" (as opposed to physical disabilities and emotional disabilities) would, in my mind, be more accurate.
Any use of any label of a "special needs" individual will eventually become an insult, or in some way derogatory.
It's hopeless to try to change it.
When i was younger "Retard" was bad and "mentally handicapped" was ok.
Then I used the term in public about 2 years ago and was almost thrown out of the room!!
Now I hear people insultingly using the term "special needs". It's hopeless to keep the idea PC.
I agree. The word retard has a specific meaning - certain faculties being retarded and therefore not developing as usual - it becomes an insult not because of the word itself, but because of the way people have used it.
You can't keep changing the terminology every 5 minutes because someone somewhere used it in a nasty way.
"The word retard has a specific meaning"
Actually, it has two, depending on pronunciation. If you say retard, it's a verb, and it means to slow something down. (Musicians will recognize the abbreviation "ret." which is shorthand for "retardando," which means "When you get here, slow the tempo down."
If you say retard, it's a noun, and a pejorative (which has the added baggage of insulting not only the person you're trying to insult but also an entire group of innocent people).
I don't know why you assume I'm trying to insult someone. But you're right, I meant 'retarded'.
Once upon a time, the word "moron" was a clinical term.
Now it's a pejorative, and people can use it without being accused of insensitivity to folk who are actually cognitively impaired (though they're still being rude to the person they're calling a moron).
But I disagree that all terms for disabilities will always become pejoratives over time. Once upon a time, "dumb" used to mean only "unable to speak." It eventually became a pejorative, and a synonym for stupid. For some reason, though, "mute," which also means "unable to speak," has not become a pejorative. People say "That's a dumb idea," but I've never encountered the sentence, "That's a mute idea."
With a specific, real person they have specific, real condition you can refer to such as Downs or fetal alcohol or simply low IQ.
True. And this thread is rapidly becoming a moot (not to be confused with mute) point.
However, I'm impressed that not a single poster has yet resorted to calling another posted a REtard. Quel restraint!
no matter what, even though I feel as though the word retard is just as valid as handicapped or special needs...
... I've just heard it too many times in an insulting manner for me to think that it would be ok to say.
by bayoulady 12 years ago
I was just on another forum on hubpages, and the guy says,I'm retarded." Meaning to say that he can't figure something out.WHY are we ever so careful not to say this offending word, or that word. But when it comes to our gentle souls, the mentally challenged, it's supposed to HUMORous??????Any...
by dejajolie 12 years ago
I am all for being careful not to offend anyone but as someone who is not easily offended, it's hard for me to understand those who get offended over such things:Use to say PC TermMerry Christmas ...
by Elynjo 13 years ago
Hoopla. Most of the people these days are trying so hard to be politically correct and refused to call a person who entered the United States illegally an "Illegal Alien" for fear of being branded as "racist". For me, if you're illegal, you are illegal. No sugar coating, no...
by qwark 12 years ago
Why are we "Americans" so damned sensitive about the way something is verbally expressed?Why not tell it like it is!?
by ptosis 7 years ago
I don't know much about art - but I know what I like.Just because somebody's art is butt ugly but is trying to say something - should it be banned?How about this from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/ma … -apartheidThis art is already destroyed but the guy is still being sued...
by nightwork4 11 years ago
is being politicaly correct counter-productive?is there a need for honesty versus being politicaly correct . not rude but saying what you really think.
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|