By the way, Mark, I'm almost flattered that you're focusing on my pretty red (and fuschia) noggin rather than picking apart my religious outlook on life.
That is because your religious outlook on life is a perfectly reasonable one that you do not attempt to "shove down people's throats."
If you tried to persuade me that I needed to believe what you believe, or I would go to hell and burn for all eternity, I would pick it to pieces in a heart beat.
I am with Mr. Jefferson on this one. "Religion is a matter between Man (or Woman in this case) and his (her) god."
Paraphrased a little......
True God is very personal.The Buddha was mocked by some and asked for proof of his enlightenment to which he replied nature is my witness.
Atheism rules ... What does it rule? ... The heart. ... Whose heart? ... The atheist's heart.
Fair enough. It is the simplicity of atheism that matters. Just one phrase "there is no GOD." Say those words and you are an instant atheist. The moment you think otherwise, you are fired!
... or is there more to it than just that? Enlighten us please! oops! "enlighten" is not the right word! Enlightenment leads to other things! Sorry!
Nope, that's it.
And once you are enlightened, it is the only sensible choice. No talking snakes, no need to inflict it on others, no wondering if you have chosen the right religion. No worrying about going to hell if you did.
But - Here's the kicker:
Now, you are responsible for you. No one else to blame it on. It is all down to you
If you behave like a shite, you are to blame.
Quicksand- think of it like this, rules to atheism, or atheism rules- as stated above, you are responsible for you. no one else to blame it on, it is all down to you. atheism rules!
thou shall not pass the blame.
Of course everyone is responsible for his/her own actions. That's sooo obvious it does not even warrant stating.
... I guess I saw an extra "e" somewhere.
Besides atheism is sooooo simple ... no messiah ... no unholy book ... no funding ... just follow what Atheos the Greek said ...
Yeh, Atheism is real simple. Just agree with the proposition "There is no God".
I don't believe in that proposition, ergo, I am not an atheist.
I don't believe in that proposition because it is incoherent, it would be like saying:
There is no blob.
It is an incoherent statement because "God" cannot be coherently stated and reduced down to one entity or aspect that is identifiable across the board. So whose "God" doesn't exist? The "God" of Allah? The "God" of Elohim? The "God" of Baal? The "God" of Athena? The "God" of Zeus? The "God" of Jupiter? The "God" of Ra? The "God" of Set?
I would say there is no solidly demonstrable proposition of mystical or occult knowledge of any sort (including all the thing in the above paragraph). There are just contentions and people who believe them as far as I can tell. I don't believe in any of the above "Gods" but that doesn't mean I agree with the proposition "There is no God" anymore than I would "There is no dog". Whose dog? What dog? What color dog? What size dog?
I'll put it to you this way, I haven't found a mystical or occult form of knowledge worth believing in that is supposedly there and requires faith and acceptance rather than knowledge and repeatability or knowledge and honesty, or knowledge and falsifiability.
Knowledge is the key, that is god knowledge actual proof that god exists.This you will find within in meditation.
The responsibility after enlightenment is deadly serious.As an atheist its not.
Unless your enlightenment leads you to understand the true meaning of the universe and see the fallacy and damage done by people claiming enlightenment when in fact they are blinkered, closed-minded souls leading others down a dark path to no where and encouraging them to waste their lives on the trivial while claiming it is deadly serious.
Just look at what the enlightened christians and muslims are telling you on the other threads and then tell me this is not worth battling with.
You got it all wrong.Your very limited understanding is leading you to this conclusion.Right the enlightened ones damage and the atheist heals
I repeat you are a funny guy.
Mo, you are blinded by your self-realized "enlightenment." Did you even read what the other enlightened ones were telling you? Have you even ever read anything I have said? Or did you just see the word "atheist," and take it from there?
You are the one who has it all wrong.
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
You are correct the person who gets ranked 1 till date in religious poetry is wrong and you
are right- funny guy
This I what I mean by saying the atheist believes he can do what he wants-insulting a religious poet is just part of the days work.
An atheist so intertested in his score on a religious forum-funny guy
And also incase you havent noticed by now ,you being the one who is blind I get along superbly with many spiritual or god believing people here.
There were so many of us who got together and tried to get some sense into you.
Mo, I am not going to buy your poetry book.
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Gautama Siddharta
Mark I have said in one way the atheist is correct and looking for proof of God or enlightenment.You wont understand my book right now,it will take time. But when I show you my credentials and you still keep giving me crap then I think you are being foolishly stubborn.
Although it is not exactly that simple, that is still the general idea.
No blaming the devil, not praying enough, vices, or other things.
If you screw up and you don't believe in "God", the only way to make it right is in real time with real people. "God" won't save you, even if somehow you are unjustly accused of something.
Think twice before you murder, steal, or break the law, because if you wind up in jail or seriously hurt someone "God" won't save you (you cannot just repent and restore yourself to grace knowing that even if you die in jail you might still goto heaven), this life is all that you know for sure that you have and if you don't play by the rules then the system will play you right into a corner and keep you there as long as need be.
So you better be law abiding in the most part or be prepared to face the serious consequences if you decide not to...
In one way Mark you are correct as you are looking for proof of God.This world may move in synchronisity and have laws which hint at a higher entity at the same time one should look for the proof or enlightenment or contact with that super enitity.Believing is fine but one must find his own proof.
Er ... before I get blown to bits ... lemme say this ... I know about atheism. I was just kidding.
One of the atheists I was acquainted with, was a believer prior to his marriage getting screwed up!
I also understand why others turn to atheism. Constantly seeing injustice everywhere is one reason. They feel if GOD did exist, he would certainly bring about a dramatic kind of justice like it happens in the movies.
Another thing is the inconsistency in religions, and the propaganda spamming.
I understand the reasons for atheism, although I neither support nor condemn.
As for me, I believe in a GOD!
Well, what about heaven, hell, the devil ... ? I dunno! I strongly think heaven and hell are on good old Planet Earth.
Being born to a poverty stricken family is hell!
Being born to sane, loving parents (not necessarily rich, although preferable!) is heaven.
In addition, if there is a celestial heaven, great. We all stand a chance depending on the intention behind our deeds.
Hell? Well, a subterranean hell is too bad to be true. Devil? Hmmm! I really don't think so. Even if he did exist he is less powerful than GOD! So who cares?
In short ... I really dunno much! ... and I am not much bothered either ...
Then why did I participate in this discussion? JUST FOR FUN!!!!!!
That is as good a reason as I have heard
Well, "a fun way of exploring" I should have said. Jokes apart, it is good to hear the opinions of everyone, right or wrong, ridiculous or intelligently accurate.
Hell is made by man. Heaven is made by man. The creator of everything here is man and MAN only. To escape responsibility, he put all the blame on GOD. Worshipping god should be limited so that some useful things can be done in that time. Have your own god. Do not deny others' gods. Go to some orphanages.. go to some old age homes.. console them and entertain them; then it means you are worshipping god. God will not forgive one who wastes time and money in his name. He needs no advertisements. It is everyone's responsibility to worship his own god. Others should not try to impose their faith on others.
Disregarding the self-promoting obscure website ranking holder -
Mark, what positive changes have occurred in your life since (I'm assuming you shifted to atheism, if I am wrong please correct my erroneous assumption) atheism became your way?
Charlotte - that is an excellent question. No one has ever asked me that before, so I am going to have to think about it and formulate a decent reply.
Briefly -
A greater understanding of the way the world works.
A strong sense of connection to and desire to protect the natural world.
A fascination of the natural world.
The ability to see most churches for what they really are.
Responsibility for my own actions and a greater understanding of what drives me to make the decisions I make.
Freedom from having to believe I am born a sinner and some how worthless unless I follow a certain credo.
A sense of humor about all of the above.
One concrete thing that is measurable is - time spent in church. I can think of no greater waste of my time that the hours and hours of uncomfortable crap I sat through as a young man having it driven into me that god was all about national pride and wars and fighting and killing and maiming and "loving," but really meaning hating.
It disturbs me no end to go into almost any British church and see regimental banners hanging from the walls and lists of "honored" war dead plastered all over the place.
I will be back with more later.
Stay tuned........
Care to back that up with an argument of some kind?
Jawohl mein Herr!!!
In order to be an atheist, you need to know one thing. That one thing is GOD. You've got to know the definition, what people say of him, how people react when he is discussed and so on.
This is absolutely essential in order to arrive at your decision.
Even if your parents have been atheists, the atheism that they so vehemently force down your esophagus, has to definitely make some reference to GOD. They keep on telling you there is no GOD. Then you ask, "momma, whath is GOJ?"
Then your momma tells you. She is certain to give you a description, and tell you of the stupidity of the people who say there is such a thing as GOD.
So, that's how it happens. You are now like your parents, you have been made an atheist. It is only later on when your intelligence increases, you are able to state reasons by observation and inference.
If one, or both your parents had been believers, then the statement that atheists are made and not born, need not be supported by any evidence.
So, an atheist has to know GOD, in order to disbelieve in him. So will this tarnish the accepted definition of atheist?
Atheists are people who know GOD, but disbelieve in him!
ROTFLMH&AO!
NOTABLE: You said in the previous post that "you were brought up to believe in Christianity." That further supports my statement.
That is the best you can do?
I do not dis-believe in god.
There is no such thing as god.
In fact it wouldn't even come up in conversation unless some one says it exists.
And my family were anything but atheist.
More
I am not sure all of these changes can be considered "positive," but I will try in greater detail now.
I meant what I said also - Not one single person has ever asked me this question before you did.
I guess the main benefit was losing the "cognitive dissonance," that comes with trying to believe something that doesn't make any sense. I won't go into details as to why it does not make sense, because I think I have probably covered that.
I think part of society's issues come from people denying their true selves. How can you preach love and understanding, yet at the same time favor wars, and all the other nationalistic religious positions?
It is no wonder that a large proportion of the population is on anti-depressants and seeing mental health therapists. I don't know the figures, but I am sure it is a lot. And I am not saying that this is the entire problem, but I am sure it is part of it.
Once you take a belief in god (and I will use the christian god because that is what I was bought up to believe in) out of the equation - It opens up all sorts of possibilities that previously were ignored. Maybe the muslims have it right? maybe the hindus do? maybe Eric von Danniken was right?
This means exploring other options in a open way rather than coming from the standpoint of "well, I already know the TRUTH, so what is this other rubbish that I already know is false?"
Most people I argue with automatically assume that I have not done any research, not seriously considered their religion and have decided to "believe in evolution as my religion."
Nothing could be further from the truth. I spent a great deal of time seeking an understanding of a wide variety of beliefs before I came to my conclusion. I won't say I explored every single one, or in as great a detail as the christian religion, but still....
If I had to choose one to believe in, it would probably be Zen Buddhism or one of the Native American Indian philosophies because they teach a respect for the natural world and have an understanding of just how important we are in the great scheme of things.
It also allows me to try and see things as they really are. Not how some religious book tells me how it is. All the time I believe god has his hand in things, I am, to a certain extent, absolving myself of any responsibility.
Positive? I am not sure. Some of the things I see people doing (in the name of god or not) lead me to wonder sometimes.....
More to follow as time and thoughts allow......
Nice try
May Darwin's blessings be upon you also my child........
I'm enthused to have asked you a question never before asked of you. I wait with eagerness and an open mind for the expanded answer, at your leisure of course.
I definitely think atheism is a conclusion come to by those who have given thought to it - from the moment one states they are an atheist they are challenged to justify their belief or lack thereof. Atheism is an interesting way to live, that's for sure!
You don't have to believe in God for this though. You can follow the philosophical bent that there is no Free Will and that everything that happened after the Big Bang is an inevitable series of successive events, each causaly related to the one prior and with no possible other outcome. Thus the debate over whether there is a God or not can be removed from the debate over Free Will. The Big Bang does not require a God to fire it up, so to speak, but it allows for one if people want one to be the cause. By separating the God part out from the Free Will debate, you can then decide whether or not you have Free Will or if your actions are all inevitable by A) the chemical and physical laws that govern action/reaction that take place after an initial event like the BB (regardless of it being God spawned or its own thing), OR B) If your actions are inevitable because you are just a puppet of God and/or Satan.
Not sure I believe in the Big Bang either
Free will all the way......
Yeah, the Big Bang is almost as squishy as "God." At least there's some math involved, though. I have to lean towards that for which there is some evidence over that for which there is none. But, unlike many, I still don't declare to have "the truth." I'm still hoping for something concrete to come along and settle it finally. Not holding my breath, but hey, I'll keep an open mind just in case.
As for Free Will, I like to think we have it, but frankly, I can argue either side with equal ferocity. That's why in my mind the two things God/No God, and Free Will/No Free Will are kept so close, but can remain separate for the sake of debate. Neither requires the other, but both can involve the other. Be interested to hear your arguments for that opinion of Free Will, but I bet you already wrote them in that 50 page Free Will hub.
Big Bang - yeah, Maths..... But the kind of maths I do not understand. Not the 2+2 sort of maths I can get to grips with. I have no idea what a quark is. And much as I have tried to grasp it, I just do not understand how they measure them or how this applies.
I just cannot seem to get my head around the idea that the universe has a beginning and I rather get the feeling that the scientists who postulated this theory started from exactly the same place as the religious people.
In the beginning.....
How can there be a beginning?
Free will - I have, of course, argued both positions pretty aggresively, but, in the end I think we do have free will.
Within certain limitations.
I have no doubt you have said to yourself, "why on earth did I choose to do that?" after making a decision that you thought you had free will over.
Yes we have free will. But - being aware of our motivations is key to being able to exercise this free will
I suppose the problem with the big bang is that "the beginning" and the age of the Universe doesn't have a real "beginning" point. So the math can/is completly obscure. But at least it has some logic behind it and math can always be applied accurately as long as there is some standard starting point. Obviously why it is still a theory.
Damn this is one long forum thread! I started it thinking I'd be able to catch up...and then after a few pages skipped ahead. I'm sure it was all perfectly fascinating...
I'm a militant agnostic...as in "I don't know and you don't either." Imagine me sticking out my tongue as I say that if you want...I'm fine with that.
I look at it this way...
Just because I've never seen something with my own eyes, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. For example, I've never been to heaven or hell. I've also never been to Des Moines, Iowa. Now...if I go to Wikitravel...I can see pictures of this supposed Des Moines place...what to see, what to do, where to stay..
When I consult Wikitravel on hell...I get a town in Norway, one in Michigan and the following advisory:
Hell (Hades) - A place of eternal torment. Non-essential travel discouraged as of 2008.
Heaven doesn't seem to be as clearly defined as Hell or even Des Moines. There seems to be some vague reference to "space."
Which leads me to believe that more people have been to Des Moines than Hell...but that perhaps more people have been to Hell than to Heaven since after all...there is that travel advisory in effect.
But since I have never been to ANY of those places, I'm going to have to say there is a good possibility that they may not exist.
One slight difference -
People sometimes come back from Des Moines
Mark, the argument that goes against Free Will, not saying I buy it or that I don't, can be given like this (assuming I don't butcher it lol): is that we only have the illusion of free will. The decision to... eat that sandwich is not yours but the combination of previous events that lead to the bread and meat and mustard etc. being in the same place at the same time that you arrived at the sandwich shop, compelled by the grumbling in your stomach, which was caused by the lack of nutrients as your body had used up all the last ones, because you worked hard in your yard all morning, which you did because the weeds grew there (perhaps because you are alergic or because your wife nagged you too [she being on her own causal course, so I have to leave this here]), the weeds having grown there because of the processes of growth and sendimentary blah blah that came about after the Earth cooled, which only happened after the solar system formed, which was a direct and inevitable outcome of the processes put in motion by the big bang.
I know, big bang is as nebulous as God, and there are other behaviors besides sandwich eating (like heroic acts and other stuff - which I can actually do with this argument too, but they take more space so I kept it simple), but if you just kind of let that example have a moment in your consideration, you have to admit, its a fun and compelling argument for the side of No Free Will, whether you buy it or not. The complexity of the causal chain implied is gianormous (so unfathomable for our little minds that it becomes the "proof" of God for some people), but still, you have to admit the sequence does work from a purely scientific perspective. As an Athiest, I'm surprised you're solidly in the "fo-sho there's Free Will" camp. I'm still on the fence on all this, mind you, but I do like this idea as food for thought.
Of course there is free will...you can always go to Taco Bell instead. Geesh!
I think Mark had you pegged to begin with. It's definitely Alcohol Abuse!
But I think the Alcohol Abuse that Mark was referring to was when Sandra just about spit out her beer when she read what spryte posted. Wasted beer!
*winks at Make Money*
I thought so too...I just wanted to see if Ben had an alternative explanation for that one too.
Yep
And Spryte, I think you're just facetious enough to actually give Ben a run for his money.
Hmmmmmm.
But this begs a few questions:
1. What if there is no mustard?
And -
2. Does it really make any difference?
I mean, the very fact that all these things have been set in motion, leading me to the decision to buy and eat that sandwich (with or without mustard) may well have been pre-ordained, but as long as I think I have the free will to eat or not eat that sandwich should be enough that I might as well have that free will, even if I don't.
Or :
If I understand that I am hungry and in a sandwich shop - faced with the possibilities in front of me, and there just happens to be a pre-ordained beef and mustard on rye with my name on it, what if I choose the BLT instead?
What if I say to myself "Well, it is obvious that I am going to choose the beef and mustard, so I will choose the BLT instead?"
Will the universe cease to be?
Will god be angry?
To the first one, yes, that is the illusion of free will and you are right, it doesn't matter if we have FW or not as long as we are happy to not think about it.
To your second point, that's the fun part, and you're right on your game. The correct response to your response, at least as this line of thought procedes, is like so (again, assuming I can do this theory justice):
First, the term "pre-ordained" is not really what this idea promotes. It's more like inevitable in the causal sequence. If you hit me in the eye, the swelling and discoloration that follow are not "pre-ordained" as in, commanded by something, but inevitable outcomes of broken cellular tissue etc. (don't ask me why you hit me, that goes back to why you ordered the sandwhich, which I'm getting to in a sec). So, there is no pre-ordinance, only another link in the cause-effect chain.
Second: according to this idea, you will choose the sandwhich you choose (and even to have gone into the sandwhich shop rather than the burger joint etc.) because of the same sequence of events and chemical/physical reactions. You may choose the roast beef over the BLT because you had a salad last night and your body's chemical balance is adjusted on the high side for vitamins B, C and E, but low on protiens, thus making the beef sandwich SEEM more desirable to you. The same kind of thing keeps happening backwards in time for why you had the salad (whether you chose it because of a chemical balance or because of convienience because your wife made it, it's what was in the fridge... whatever).
SO, because you had no choice in choosing the beef sandwich really, and because the universe is simply a big complex series of dominoes falling down, the universe doesn't end because you "chose" the beef unless somewhere down the line the beef turned out be rancid, causing you to be sick, which pissed you off and you went and shot the store manager, whose father is a terrorist leader, who ordered a nuke be set off somewhere in revenge, and that starts a war that ends in the Earth being destroyed upon which occasion a large chunk of the planet careens into mercury which falls into the sun, which explodes and does something weird that causes the other suns to explode after which they all fall back in on themselves simultaneously becoming black holes which then devour the universe.
So, yeah, something like that might cause the end of the universe, but it's not because you had any choice in the matter. You're just another domino and everythign you do is a tiny domino etc.
So...it's not my fault if I ordered a Big Mac with a large french fry and a coke? Since...it was circumstances that led me to this decision and not my illusion of free will?
So tell me, did you freely choose to respond to Marks questions and/or statements? Or is Mark just your antagonist in this forum's causal sequence?
Well, and again, since I think you might not recognize that I'm just working with a theory here, not claiming it as my own or as my guiding principal (for redundancy and clarity), according to this cause and effect idea, I didn't actually have any choice to respond. The course of events that set me at this computer to day - rooted in work, family concerns etc. stemming back through the trajectory of my marriage and career etc. - had me in an emotional state (the outcome of chemical reactions and neurology, all subject to yesterday's sleep patterns and my diet etc)) to have action triggered by Mark's comments, which were brought about conditions similar but different to mine. Your comments are the same etc.
Again, I'm just playing the role of this theory for the purpose of examining the idea. (I like it, but as I've said already, not sure I buy it. Maybe I do, maybe I don't. I'm open to it as a possibility is all.)
Well the reason that brings me here to reply to your post stems back to where Arthur (dad) thought Flossie (mom) was looking pretty cute one night.
Nope hang on I'll have to go back further than that. Now it goes like this. Alexander (Arthur's dad) thought Barbara (Alexander's wife) was looking pretty cute one night. And a few years later Flossie's parents were looking at each other the same way.
Nope hang on again. It goes like this ... Oh heck I could go back for generations.
But only for about 6,000 years if you want this tale to be believable.
No, the 6000 years is covered in my original sandwich example to Mark, which took his hunger from the yardwork that arose due to the weeds which grew in the soil that cooled when the Earth was made, which was the inevitable outcome of the Big Bang. The evolution of life, which ultimately led to all those parents meeting each other is part of the same sort of thing that brought about the weeds... so, yes, you have the theory down with that subsequent generations thing, but might not realize that it includes the whole of the universe not just mankind or God's part in things. In fact God is not required for it to work, or God can be the cause of the sequence. This particular idea can function either way, if you allow for God to create but not control (or, he could have planned the whole sequence out in advance... whichever you like), but the Big Bang does not require a God to have happened either. (That sentence is clunky, but I'm not going to fix it. lol.)
Nope, not if you like this theory. Blame it on the big bang.
But that is not what I said.
I said
Not that I didn't think about it. I did think about it and came to the (possibly erroneous) conclusion that I did have free will. So, does it really matter if I think I do when I don't?
But this only works retro-actively. Everything is cause and effect. Thus, if I choose to order the BLT, despite the fact that I am pre-ordained to order the beef (for whatever preceding causes and effects), I am changing the outcome.
I have no idea what the ramifications are for doing so, but it does not negate my ability to make that decision. And I certainly cannot consider the possible ramifications for every single decision I make, because I am not privy to all the possibilities.
What if the beef is rancid..........?
spryte - no more will I chastise Shadesbreath for spelling proteins, protiens or everything, everythign
Although, it is compliment.
Not that I am a stickler for such things .....
Well, the same reasoning goes either way. If you don't order the roast beef, it will be for some reason resulting from chemistry and neurology. It could be that your mother used to beat you if you didn't eat your Beef sandwiches when you were a kid, and while you may have sublimated the memory, the neural patterns are there for not choosing the beef even if you had a momentary urge. Basically, there's a reason for everything you do dating back through time. You don't have to buy the idea, but the idea works for countering any idea I've ever seen thrown at it.
Just because it works doesn't mean it's true.
And, if the beef was rancid and you knew it, you would not choose it because previous experiences have shown you the negative outcomes of food poisoning.
But, I was wondering if I should ask myself the question.
"What if the beef is rancid and I end up shooting the sandwich shop owner who's father is a terrorist and he decides to nuke the world in retribution and the world comes to an end because I ordered the beef?"
No one would ever do anything..........
THIS is why you are so fun to argue with Mark.
One of the main uses of this particular philosophical bent is for criminal defense, which you have obviously recognized (or seem to have). Argued well, by an articulate attorney with a far better grasp on it than I have, and with the help of some psychiatric adherents to the theory, yes, technically, that's the defense's case: He could not help but do what he did.
This is also one of the main reasons I don't really buy it all the way. Not because it might not be true, but because I don't like the implications.
So I AM responsible for ordering a #1 special at McDonalds.... *sigh*
No, it was god's will. You are in no way responsible. You can relax now
That's true, if you put God as the originator of the sequence (whether he had Spryte's burger in mind when he did it, or just created the chain and is watching it run), you can definately blame God.
Mark I like all this talk about God coming from you today.
But this talk about the big bang is making me hungry.
Talk to you later.
to toss another drop in the bucket...the new skinario goes. I am craving something, I don't know what it is, I am not really hungry but I can't get over this feeling that I want something to satisfy whatever is going on. sooo....I go to the fridge, poke through whatever I got...seems like a grilled cheese sandwich will do the trick.
So I eat it but nope, it didn't do the trick. So I go back and I keep eating, all along I am getting full and still not satisfied. All along I knew that I really wanted a pollo asada burrito but instead of just getting it, I decided that I would do with what I had.
So finally to kill the craving, I go and get the burrito and finally I am satisfied! But now, I have the guilt. Instead of just going and getting what I knew I really wanted, I ingested a trillion calories, which was the reason I decided againts the burrito in the first place.
My free will just ruined my diet, all because I didn't just listen to myself. If this makes any sence at all, the point would be... I was pre-ordained (lol) to get me that burrito because it had something in it that would satisfy whatever my body was telling me I needed. Instead I chose freely to deprive myself of all the yummy fat and in the end, I ended up with more than I could have otherwise needed.
....
The compulsion to eat may have been the manifestation of something completely unrelated to food... an example might be your stress over the fact your boss has been acting the ass lately, which has driven your chemical balances out of whack emotionally, so, you have cravings based not on dietetic necessity but psychologically induced chemistry instead.
I'm telling you, this particular angle "causation" is tough to get around.
Well I already given in to every action having a reaction and one down the line it goes. or there is no such thing as free lunch or what goes around comes around, or karma, or (i forget what knowyourself said it was called) galgia or gia, anyways something like that.
I am all for free will too, but I also know that on a subconscious level I have been fed , so in many ways, it was never my will, but always the will of others. I can change it but to be brainwashed to the point of not really knowing what "I" really want, that is another question. lol And included in this is also what we inherite from nature. Our genes, our ancestors etc.
example: death
LOL!
Well, I don't think Shadesbreath is acting adversarial toward you either...in fact, I'm enjoying the banter here between the two of you.
Although, your argument about choosing the BLT to thwart the choice of beef...couldn't that have been just as easily been the choice you were supposed to make?
While I'd like to believe that I cannot be held accountable for bad choices and then blame it on lack of free will...I've never had a situation occur where I didn't have alternatives. And to be fair...that's really all the free will I need. The rest is out of my control and I would drive myself nuts thinking that I could exert anything like free will over it.
This reminds me of The Princess Bride, when what's his face poisoned one of the glasses of wine, and he goes on this schpeel about, I know you know, I know, you know, soo...blah,blah, blah...
then the Prince lets him do his deducing and drinks the glass of wine, and says, well I saw this moment coming, so I had been making myself immune to the poison. lol. sorry....
it's funny!!!!
"The decision to... eat that sandwich is not yours" Absolutely. I must eat. No free will there. However I believe I could have eaten ice cream or had a beer instead. If I could not, I might be prevented by my conditioning. But that can be deconstructed, albeit - a lot of work.
I must have missed Mark's statement regarding Shadesbreath and alcohol abuse, Ben...can you steer me to it?
And oh no...Mark...you are about to be beaten with Shadesbreath's grammar cane. I'll just be hiding behind the door over here....out of the way....
It actually wasn't aimed at Shadesbreath, but non free will person that I am, I knew where it should ultimately end up at. And I was destined to make this point.
Shade walks loudly and carries a single broom straw.
*blinks*
I wasn't aware that straws had brooms...
But perhaps you might have just gotten over-excited and allowed your fingers to type before you actually thought it completely through and meant single strawed broom?
In which case...I would think...wow...that would have been an effective insult coming from somebody who got it right...
I said exactly what I meant, "a single broom straw" not a single strawed broom.
Hmmm...yes I can see how they would be different. Having a broom straw could prove useful for many things...since it's not necessarily part of a broom. But a single strawed broom would be a rather frustrating tool...
So it was a complement! Okay...I feel much better now. Thanks for correcting me.
(I'm not much for grammatical pettiness either....uh...really)
Ben, way to, once again, totally miss what everyone is saying. lol.
And Spryte, I think or hope, my attempted explanation of that particular theory as I understand shows you how you don't actually get to chose Taco Bell or not. You are compelled to go, and so, eat that super sized meal guilt free. LOL. If you decide to go on a health kick, that also was inevitable.
And yes, I cringed at that "begs" thing, Spryte, I laughed that you caught it, but I don't hold stuff like that against a good argument. Substance is far greater than some trivial grammar crap. You know me.
It seems to me that the possibility that anyone else has missed anything has not occured to you.
It also seems that you have not considered the possibility that I chose to miss what certain ones were saying.
Of course, it could be that we're all morons because some sub atomic happenstance in some bygone era has set in motion some set of inevitable events.
Or should I conlude that you're even too stupid to be considered an Atheist or a Theist?
Proper Grammer is the vehicle of Philosophical substance.
I could...but I don't need to. I'm quite capable of making sure that when I use a quote in a shallow attempt to sound superior that first, I make sure it's spelled correctly.
Are you sure that you're not Shade"s twin sister?
That's me, a superior moron!
Why? Does the idea of two totally unrelated people, both being of superior intellect, wit and charm sound threatening?
I'm out of here for now too...commuter fun time beckons! Catch everyone later!
I'm from Texas where we shoot anything threatening and ask questions later.
Actually I find it rather sophisticated.
I take consolation in the fact that you have actually taken it easy on me and have offered me a chance to learn at your feet. Such truth is overwhelming, especially to a moron possessing so much potential.
BTW, I will gladly be the first to sign up for your English Grammar 101 class.
I tried to go back a few pages to try and get the gist of this thread, but my brain seized up.
So I'll cop out and restrict myself to a shallow string of smilies above.
P.S. How many of these mammoth threads are you guys involved with?
I stand (sit) in awe!
Ok, that's just funny all by itself.
Yes, it has.
Yes, I have considered it, I'm just not sure what the benefit of willfully misconstruing someone's point is unless you are just belligerant and obtuse by some nature of your personality, you have some weird mental disorder, or you are a sophist and try to twist things for psuedo-victory.
That could be. Some of us got hit by the moron factor harder than others though.
Yes, am too stupid to pin labels on myself that categorize me as firmly resolved to believe in crap I can't prove either way.
"I'm from Texas where we shoot anything threatening and ask questions later." Which is why I would never go to Texas. Figure never get out alive.
You know what... What did kerk really do? Stop bones from being so damn whiny. Jean Luck Pickard, He stopped the borg. Now thats the man!
Those monkeys that we evolved from, are still around. How come? Oh, probably only a selected few monkeys had the privilege of joining the evolution string ... and get evolved. The other guys were left out. Poor fellows!
Only the chosen ones got to get evolved.
Darwin went to bed early. :LOL: I mean
Just cannot be bothered to educate yourself huh?
Not worth the effort?
Waste of time?
What exactly?
It is just that Darwin had more evidence to suggest that man evolved from monkeys than he had, to suggest otherwise.
The very same natural selection method by means of which we are "destined" to evolve into two other species. By transmutation or whatever ... (my memory lets me down)
The Morlocks and the Eloys. Who will be the morlocks? The fittest? I don't think so!
How about what Hodge said?
Atheists multiply...but they call it enlightenment.
I do not understand the link between atheists and enlightenment !!! ... and multiplying. Please "enlighten" me.
An atheist can get enlightened :)then become poet or preacher life is strange
There are so many jokes here it is not even funny
If I told you to "go forth and multiply," I am basically saying "F*** off."
Multiplication, as in mathematics, can be considered as "enlightenment,"
I, as an atheist, consider myself to be "enlightened," because I have cast off all the superstitions about god, which is funny if you think about it. An enlightened atheist. Mostly because of the offense it will cause to those who believe.....
Going forth and multiplying, multiplication, enlightenment, sexually reproducing, atheism. Take your pick as to what you find funny.
After all, that is the true purpose of life - to experience and enjoy it
enlightened atheist. -new one, never heard that before- an entirely new species.
I am going to need it. I couldn't write a poem worth reading if my life depended on it.
Hi Mark - I'll ghost write it for you, for an exorbitant fee, of course...
Err ... talking of ghosts ... do atheists believe in ghosts at least ... I was wondering ...
Well, I certainly believe in ghost writers.....
My word! What atrocious language, coming from the Internet's most respected atheist!
I saw stars ... between the "F" and the "off!"
Now that you confirm the atheist's view of the true purpose of life ...
Mark is sometimes referred to around here as oh salami of the god of darwinism.
I guess now he can be referred to as oh F'n salami of the god of darwinism.
"Atheists Reach Out"
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB1 … jg2Wj.html
I wonder what atheists do on the twenty fifth of December.
We know what they DON'T do!
I wonder if they give presents to their kids. Stash them under the furniture, since they would not have a tree either?
Surely that's one day on which they don't "athesize."
I guess, then, that's ONE day of the year when "santa rules"
Or perhaps they take it as a day to celebrate the love they have for thier family and friends. Perhaps they don't use objectives like presents to present their love for one another and perhaps they are more dependant on the nature of love then a name called god.
Something to think about when cutting away on your almighty high horses as to the way you think about people who share different ideals as yourself.
Your not so nice all the time and if you really wanted to be treated with respect for your beliefs then it would probably do you some good to show it for others as well.
Mark, and I exchanged a few thoughts several pages back. At one point, I realised that this is (at least could be) a rather "fun" thread. I am merely haveng some fun. He agreed. So, lets not get too serious about it all.
Sometimes jokes are at someone elses expense. I don't believe it is in this instance. The joke is on "atheism", not so much it's proponents.
Hey Guys, this is a call to action. Let's keep this forum alive ...
No, Mark is not on vacation. What were you expecting a response to exactly?
The fact that you are unable to understand the term "a-theism"?
But do not worry - I will be celebrating the winter solstice along with all the christians who believe it is a christian holiday and that the best way to celebrate the birth of their non-existent savior is to buy a load of crap and kill some trees.
Only without the crap and the tree-killing.
Phew! What a relief! Of what use would an atheist's forum be without it's CEO!
Mark, I am glad you're back!
Seriously curious ... I understand the not buying crap, and if you don't want to kill trees, I understand that too... but why celebrate the winter solstice? What is it about this event you find worth celebrating?
You got a great sense of humour
One thing I have to admit is as much as I have argued with Mark he being an athesit and me a believer,he guided me when I was wondering how to use the smilies,which reflects his decency.
There is nothing indecent about being an atheist!!!
They make us believers believe harder. In fact belief, like anything else needs some form of opposition in order to "stay alive." It's atheists who make us realize that we are the opposite of the "ism" that they profess.
That is the best BS reason for believing whatever it is you believe I have heard all day. And I have heard some good ones......
Thanks for the laugh.
Mark, Why are you so pro Atheist? Why do you feel the need to pound on others, can you not speak to others and be less critical? Why would you want them to dislike you or think you are rude, when you are definitely a nice person and I know deep inside you have a heart.
The pleasure is mine! Out of the "good ones" am I in the top ten?
Belief is the result of knowledge. Proof is a word that does not make sense here. It is knowledge that gives rise to belief. So don't blame us believers. Blame it on the knowledge that "comes our way!"
Please add this to the other "good ones" you have heard!
Well, if you just meditate long enough, you will discover that you are mistaken in this "knowledge.". Pity the "knowledge," that "came your way" via forced indoctrination from a young age is so difficult to understand that every one has a different idea of what it is - so different in fact that they are prepared to kill each other over the correct way of "interpreting," this "knowledge." "
I think you need to look the word "knowledge," up in a dictionary, because "baseless belief in something that doesn't exist," is not a valid definition.
This is not even top 100 quality. Who mentioned proof? Because a lot of you believers think the bible is "proof."
"Forced indoctrination" at a young age can only succeed in generating a "belief."
I am certain that the only problems that you ever faced are, the milkman not turning up, or not enough ice cubes for your whiskey, or the neighbor's stereo being too loud, or the cleaner messing up your favorite jacket.
Well to those who have faced problems in life and have been kicking obstacles for a long period of time, begin sometime to wonder why things happen the way they do. When you analyze these events, you realize there is some kind of a "plot" behind these happenings.
Years later, you may interpret these unfortunate events as safety valves functioning as they were designed to.
You cannot attribute these to nature. Nature does not fit in here. Nature is not all that versatile although it may cause monkeys or donkeys to evolve into humans by "natural" selection.
If you put these events to mind over matter and suggest that these are caused by fears manifesting, then we come across a thing called consciousness. The conscience arising from this gives us the power to select ethics for our day to day activities.
Putting this also down to nature is very convenient is it not? Let's not!
Ah, well, if you want to talk about personal issues and facing problems in my life, I would be happy to share a rather long list.
And if you are saying that these are part of a "plot" sent to test me, I would certainly take issue with that.
Interesting assumption you have made though:
That I have never faced a bigger issue than "the milkman not turning up, or not enough ice cubes for your whiskey, or the neighbor's stereo being too loud, or the cleaner messing up your favorite jacket."
How very judgmental of you. Which I find to be a trait typical of many christians, and is, in fact, one of the many reasons I have decided your beliefs are worthless, and there is no god.
But thanks for showing me the love.
I admire the atheist's decision (your decision) to select ethics as a way of life although there is (in your opinion) no GOD to penalize those who select to "go berserk" and live it up irrespective of who is gonna get hurt.
I am also aware that there is no penalty for disbelief and no reward for believing either. GOD is only interested in the intentions which govern each action of ours. How do I know this? Well, some form of indoctrination I guess.
This "form" of indoctrination reacts very well with one's common sense and creates that "knowledge."
It is comforting to know there is a GOD, once you get to know it. This is not for the sake of asking for favors, or forgiveness for one's anti-social acts, but it is just that you feel safe with GOD around.
That is my story. I know yours. However, saying there is no GOD brings the train to it's final destination. Going beyond would be, and could be interesting. Don't seek GOD, just seek answers. How does one do that?
Well, it's every man for himself.
Top 100?
Interesting that you choose not to respond to my points. Guess you already have all the answers from GOD, and no one else counts. Good for you.
Jenny ! Good to see you back
You have to watch this film. It explains everything you need to know about life, death and the afterlife
http://markpknowles.com/best-short-film … long-time/
No, I do not all the answers, and I did not chose not to respond to your points. I am sure you are referring to the "plot sent to test you." Well, I am not sure about these. In fact I never referred to any "testing" as such.
Problems occur just to neutralize some unsocial act performed in a previous existence or it is just a manifestation of one's fears. I dunno, and I dunno if anyone knows.
I watched the video which your link pointed to, thanks.
During my schooldays I have heard that what happens after death is exactly what you were conditioned to believing would happen. Well ... for a while ... and then everything becomes clear. I cannot form an opinion. Your video supports this, and I guess you do too.
O.K so I see this is one of the longest threads , my goodness so many of us had so much to talk about.
It's strange to see Christians appropriating New Age doctrines like "manifesting", which are grounded in mystical traditions once considered heresy.
There is a completely rational, non-supernatural explanation for "manifesting" - just Google "the reticular activating system", "unconscious symbols" and "psychodynamics".
That said, it is a reasonable description of how things work, and imagining oneself to be in contact with a vastly powerful, loving force which will carry out our will (so long as it is unambivalent - a sodding greaet caveat for most unexamined lives!) is actually a good mental ninja trick for aligning our conscious and subconscious processes in pursuit of a common goal.
Just remember it is a mental ninja trick, or you might find yourself swallowing some of the cultural baggage that comes with organised religion.
The "real God" laughs at organised religion ... what an oxymoron! Every spiritual experience is an exercise in subversion ...
Jenny
I like that last video that you posted Mark. Here's some other ones you might want to watch.
In 1859 one man's view of the world changed everything.
"The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom no design, no purpose, nothing but blind pitiless indifference."
Charles Darwin
Discover the truth about the origin of life and the universe - 5:41 minute video.
Unlocking the Mystery of Life - 5:01 minute video.
The Privileged Planet - 3:23 minute video.
Case for a Creator - 2:40 minute video.
Quotes from this web site about Ben Stein's new movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
I believe your case is just about closed Mark. I haven't proselytized up until now, just defended creation. But in this new light will you be like the prodigal son and return Home?
Mike
I just have to ask you Make Money, is the real question about Creationsim vs. Darwinsim, the removal of lifes pupose?
I mean, in some ways I reject Darwin because believing that life has no purpose leaves me empty inside and spiritually dead inside to know that we don't mean anything and will never amount to more than a major f-up in the realm of the living and knowing that "we" us living human beings who have the ability to make the lives we lives has no meaning since it will be dead and gone and the suffering was for nothing at all.
Though I do love Darwinism because it does have the ability to humble humanity because we are not much more than a grain of sand seemingly smaller than a quark in cosmic pespective.
Both however haven't done a bit of good for life as we know it anyways because we still suffer no matter what, so all I could ever come up with is that the Buddhist had it right to say, Life is suffering.
While evolution doesn't bother me, I have the hardest time ever believing that there is nothing more, it just feel that some concepts deaden the spirit, both theologically and atheistically.
One day, I hope there could be a middle ground. I guess I can never really understand why there even has to be a debate over Creationism and Evolution when it seems that acceptance of both sufices well to help in the spirit of life.
What makes you think life has a purpose other than to be lived?
Evolution is a fact. It has nothing to do with purpose, or suffering, or anything, it is just the way of things. Once you can dispense with all the purpose, born in sin and suffering crap, you can get on and enjoy life.
I know I do
Because I don't know what to live for. Plus I didn't say I think evolution is a lie. I think theologians are liars but I don't think that God is a lie either.
Live your life for you - and your children.
Play musical instruments, learn another language, travel to new places, learn to paint, meditate, drink more wine, eat too much chocolate - live !. To quote a favorite film, "Revel in your time."
Theologians are just protecting their interests. They know no more of "god" than you do
I can promise you there are no rewards in an afterlife.
Very interesting Sandra. That is the entire point. Without a divine Creator there is no hope and our existence is meaningless. We do not need to be theologians to receive salvation. We just need to follow the 3 most important verses in the Bible, Matthew 28:19, John 20:23 and the most important is John 6:55-58. You are right Sandra, the debate should not be between Creationism and Evolution. Most of the people on this planet realize that there is a divine Creator of our universe and have for thousands of years. So the debate should be just about Evolution, whether it exists or not. Please call me Mike.
Why should you think your time on this planet is meaningless? More importantly, why would you think my time is meaningless? No hope? Better believe in god then.......
This is why Atheism Rules !
Proof !
Mike,
I guess I don't see how evolution does not exist. There are some things that I can say about evolution that don't make much sence and indeed one of those things is that humans evolved from apes because other theories suggest that we evolved from reptiles so...
My only problem with evolution is that a fish is still a fish and monkey is still a monkey and so a human is still a human. However, evolution does make sence but it doesn't make sense that we evolved from Apes because Apes are still Apes but nautaulist are smaller nautaulist but a platapus was not always a platapus and dogs cannot breed with cats to make catdogs, soo....I dunno.
Still, natural selection makes sense and evolution makes sense, I just think there are some fundamental mistakes to be taken into account as to what we evolved from which would still mean that humans were always human but the time of which humans came to be is far different from the time described in the Bible.
Oh, by the apes are still apes comment, I mean that when evolution happens to all the other creatures, the old one are extint but the news ones took their place, so I wonder how come apes are still around.
Mike -
I have seen some of these before, and have now watched the ones I hadn't.
They all say the same thing
"It must have been a god, because I believe in god, therefore this wondrousness must have been created."
Not a scrap of science, or a single reason that does not rely on an inability to accept basic reality.
As far as the last quote:
Nothing is demonstrated other than Ben Stein's ignorance.
There is no evidence of a god, merely a few people's baseless opinions that "It must have been because it is so clever."
Not really a valid argument.
And if I was going to "return home," there are dozens of more appealing religions.
Yeah there's still a pile of unanswered questions regarding evolution, isn't there Sandra.
Not really Mike.
But you keep on making them up. I am sure it makes you feel better. Less hopeless?
Don't know how many questions make up a pile, but according to Evolutionary biolotist Richard E. Lenski of Michigan State University ...
"Evolutionary biology provides a scientific framework for understanding the changes that have occurred since the first life forms arose on Earth several billion years ago. Biochemists, geologists, and physicists seek natural explanations for the origin of life on Earth. While progress has been made in this area, the origin of life remains an interesting, but unanswered, question .
Like every other science, there is scientific debate about some aspects of evolution, ...
So, depending on your defintion of "pile" ... there are are least one or two questions still left unanswered ... if you choose to ...dang almost said "believe" - forgot that was a bad word here, appologies - ... let me juggle my semantics for a momment ... if you choose to respect the opinion of one of the lead evolutionary biolgists in the country.
Semantics.....
Evolutionary biology has never attempted to answer the question of abiogenesis.
But, that seems to be a good basis for "believing" it was all down to a god
"Well, science hasn't satisfactorily answer the question of how it all began, therefore it must have been a god."
As I have said many times, evolution is not the reason I decided there was no god. Common sense did that.
What are you guys going to do when science does answer the question?.........
Burn everyone at the stake?
Don't be silly, we were burning people at the stake long before evolutionary theory was invented.
There is a good argument that evolution was "invented," well before Darwin:
Animaxander and Aristotle both pointed out the obvious.
But, yes, thinking the earth was not flat, or the world was not the center of the Universe, or that Christ was not God were all valid reasons for a good burning.
Yeah, that stuff really did suck. That was wrong (of course I think it was wrong becuse God said so, and you think it was wrong ... well just cuz it was wrong) but we can at least agree that whether it's wrong because the Great Pumpkin said it, or because the Great Mark said it, it was still wrong...
Yeah burning people at the stake really makes me hot under the collar.
Speaking of burning, do you like fine cigars? (You seem to be a consesure of sorts)
I love cigars, but.......
I am not allowed to smoke them (wife) because I smoke them like cigarettes, and they always make me feel bad after. Never learn......
Yeah at $15+ each, that could get to be an expensive habit!
Give me some good cigars and I can smoke 4-5 a day
Which is why I am not allowed......
But I have a friend who buys some very nice hand-rolled ones from New Orleans at about $3 each.
Evolution is written about in the Rig Veda before the Greeks.
It is important to remember that the Vedic definition of species is different from the modern one. The Vedas mention 8,400,000 species of life and all of them are repeatedly created after every partial or total cosmic devastation.
I did not know that. I will have to brush up on my ancient Sanskrit.
And of course, this religion is much, much older than christianity, therefore much, much more valid.
True its very old and very wise.It understands Jesus and Mohammed to be prophets like Krishna was so in one aspect is the most broad minded religion.Hinduism has seen so many enlightened ones before Jesus and Mohammed.
I cannot remember the number properly but something like 5000 of the 8,400,000 are human species depending on their evolution.or level of awareness
This is what I am saying I really do not know how life started.
I see that Darwin is back. Way back in this forum I had made reference to the fact that there are still monkeys around, and I jokingly suggested that these monkeys are the descendants of the ones that refused to participate in the evolution program! You chose not to respond.
What baffles me is that the missing link is never ever discussed.
The "missing link," euphemism has been discussed ad infinitum. There is a wealth of evidence that supports a common ancestor, and, of course the theory of evolution; and there are many links to this evidence in this thread.
What baffles me is believers refusal to look at this evidence dismiss it out of hand because it proves the bible is false......
And I am not sure why I would need to respond to the same question with the same answer over and over and over.
The missing link.
One day the zoo-keeper noticed that the orang-utan was reading two books - the Bible and Darwin's The Origin of Species. In surprise he asked the ape, "Why are you reading both those books"?
"Well," said the orang-utang, "I just wanted to know if I was my brother's keeper or my keeper's brother."
Q: How do you tell the sex of a chromosome?
A: Pull down its genes.
Why did the chicken cross the road?
Darwin1: It was the logical next step after coming down from the trees.
Darwin2: The fittest chickens cross the road.
If Darwin was right, you will probably figure it out in a few million years.
Yay Jokes, my favorite
I have loads of these and will happily share
There is a common sense argument on this subject. But knowing how fearless you are about things that make you are curious, about let take reasoning to the next level.
Just for the sake of this conversation, I am going to try and add two and two. First we take a look at the strides in modern biological discovery that man has accomplished. Scientist have mapped the human genome and broken down the genetic helix that is our DNA.
Through this this medical break through or evolution of medicine they can now manipulate the make up of an embryonic human, and remove the causes of disease. They can even make recessive traits dominant and dominant traits recessive.
By this we know there is a plan or a blue print for the human body. Next question is who designed this plan? Who laid out the first blue print?
Next we take a crystal clear look at the concept of extraterrestrial life. One of the top TV series is Star Trek, and through this show we have watch the possibility of man's future laid out past the year 3036.
We have also had a look at where man kinds past have may begun. How many times has Star Trek introduced Omnipotent invisible creatures that took control of the Enterprise, and it's crew. These same creatures were able to create life like environments for them to live in.
Now lets add two and two. Once again just for the sake of this conversation, lets accept God as one of these extraterrestrial Beings. the last and only one of His kind, in the universe in which we live?
Lets say that armed with the knowledge of DNA manipulation and other great powers, he created a new race of people, US?
So while some of us are willing to believe in all things, separate and apart form each other, when we combine these thoughts, we can see how the existence of God is less far fetched.
And a completely logical explanation for the theory of man's being designed by some one of superior knowledge and ability is easier to accept.
Have we evolved as humans of course, are bodies were designed to adapt to the climates we live in, the amount of work we have to perform, how we learn and under what conditions we are able to survive and prosper.
So if you believe in Roswell and deny creation there is a hole in your soul. Or you are not being consistent. If you, accept the manipulation of DNA, or the fact the law enforcement now uses DNA, evidence as a tool to catch murders and rapist, then you are not being consistent.
In fact, under this mathematical presumption, the possibility of Jesus being cloned, makes perfect sense, for his resurrection.
When we think why instead of why not all things are possible. But then you already know this.
Do you think Jesus will be a perfect clone of his past?
This was just an academic conversation to show how creation could have happened. The purpose of the clone was temporary. But to answer your question Jesus was, is, and shall remain perfect, in fact his perfection has opened the door for all to be saved.
Don't believe me ask God, he has provided the answer in the Holy Bible.
God said he has come in different forms like Krishna ,Buddha and Jesus.
All humans have god in them some have understood like Jesus and others will with time.There will come a time when every single human becomes like Jesus.
Yes he was an enlightened or awkened or perfect being I agree with that. ,
Even ten thousand thundering typhoons cannot dislodge an atheist's belief ... or disbelief.
Disbelief.
Although, I have said it many times. If you have some proof, I am all over it. I will be grovelling, judging every one else, inflicting what my god says on all and sundry, trying to have my beliefs written into law and begging for money to build a new church with the best of them.
So sorry about this, but I do not have proof. Nobody has. This is what I have always been saying. But that does not mean ... Oh! we've discussed that before.
By the way, belief is not about building churches or temples or mosques or synagogues or tombs. Belief is a knowledge of the existence of a GOD.
Building places of worship is associated with religion. I know nothing about religion.
Thanks for reminding me about Captain Haddock (Tintin). I always felt Herge was so creative in inventing such non sensical insults. Billions of bilious blue blistering barnacles will it help change some one?
Hi CountryWomen, what continues to amuse me is Captain Haddock's reaction to the sound of a popping cork!
Pop=cork. Cork=bottle. Bottle=WHISKEY!!!
On the subject of whiskey ... I suppose that is the only spirit atheists believe in ... provided they have enough ice cubes.
Scientists and God
One day a group of Darwinian scientists got together and decided that man
had come a long way and no longer needed God. So they picked one Darwinian
to go and tell Him that they were done with Him.
The Darwinian walked up to God and said, "God, we've decided that we no
longer need you. We're to the point that we can clone people and do many
miraculous things, so why don't you just go on and get lost."
God listened very patiently and kindly to the man. After the Darwinian was
done talking, God said, "Very well, how about this? Let's say we have a
man-making contest." To which the Darwinian happily agreed.
God added, "Now, we're going to do this just like I did back in the old
days with Adam."
The Darwinian said, "Sure, no problem" and bent down and grabbed himself a
handful of dirt.
God looked at him and said, "No, no, no. You go get your own dirt!!!!"
That punch line was very good. Thanks Mike for that joke.
Mark- You made my day. I will now sleep laughing at your jokes and have a great week ahead .
I guess you can share those so that you will have non regular crowd like me also checking this forum. Otherwise I see only rhetoric people who believe will believe and people who don't won't no matter what one says to the other their is never going to be an agreement. At least by way of humor one can get a serious point across in a funny way (at least laugh about it even if some one disagrees with the content). My final good bye for the day and Have a great week ahead.
Funny illustrations indeed. However, thats the play of self, religion and science. Anyway, "The Spirit Rules!"
The founder of atheism did not leave behind any written instructions.
Damn right. Nothing to fight over here
Not that you know anything of religion.........
All you are doing is demonstrating the fact that you did not read from the start of this thread.
Although, I have yet to see you say anything constructive and/or add anything to the discussion. You believers do seem to jump to an awful lot of conclusions.
Why is that? Does it threaten you in some way when some one refuses to believe your fairy tale?
Well, if you have something other than a judgmental opinion based on nothing, I would be happy to discuss it with you. So far all you have done is attack me and accuse me of never having had to deal with a personal issue more demanding than whether or not I had enough ice in my drink.
I am sorry that my refusal to believe your fairy tale offends you. I am more sorry that the foundation for your belief system is so obviously precarious.
Eventually, you will work it out.
Trust me, you will feel much better when you divest yourself of the obvious cognitive dissonance that is making you so obnoxious.
I guess you are offended by something or everything. You shouldn't be, because no offense was ever intended or encrypted.
In fact you may have not noticed that I have been actually agreeing with you on most things, including the video which you recommended that I watch.
Ah so you didn't mean to offend me when you said this:
And I guess you do not think this is a judgmental or condescending statement to make either.
My mistake.
If an atheist and a believer were drowning, which one would you save?
These Posts, reminded me of a very funny conversion I had. My Uncle was a pretty cool guy retired Marine Corps Pilot, and then worked for the FAA, and then the State Department. Somewhere along the way he must have pissed somebody off because he got assigned to the jungle in Irian Jaya on the Island of New Guinea. So we go to visit him and he took us on a tour into the jungle to meet the locals. I don't remember what they were called, but I still have pictures. In one of the pictures we took of my aunt she is posing with one of the Chief's mummified ancestors.
He explained this was a great status symbol, letting everyone know his family had not fallen on hard times. As those families that did had eaten there mummies. Later in the evening we are talking about religion, because of course someone in the group felt the need to save the savage's mortal soul. Long story short the Chief tells him over the years the Buddhist's have come to save him, the Mohammedans have come to save them and the Christians had come to save them. Then he said you know what the only difference he could tell from all three. Of course were all sucked in at this point.
He said the Christians gave them more Gas.
TMG
I got the following in an email, and just couldn't resist posting it here.
"In Florida , an atheist created a case against the upcoming Easter &
Passover holy days. He hired an attorney to bring a discrimination case
against Christians, Jews & observances of their holy days. The argument
was ~ it is unfair that atheists had no such recognized day(s).
The case was brought before a judge. After listening to the passionate
presentation by the lawyer, the judge banged his gavel declaring, 'Case
dismissed.'
The lawyer immediately stood objecting to the ruling saying, 'Your
honor, how can you possibly dismiss this case? The Christians have
Christmas, Easter & others. The Jews have Passover, Yom Kippur &
Hanukkah. Yet my client & all other atheists have no such holidays.'
The judge leaned forward in his chair saying, 'But you do. Your client,
counsel, is woefully ignorant.'
The lawyer said, 'Your Honor, we are unaware of any special observance
or holiday for atheists.'
The judge said, 'The calendar says April 1st is 'April Fools Day.' Psalm
14:1 states 'The fool says in his heart, there is no God.' Thus, it is
the opinion of this court, that if your client says there is no God,
then he is a fool. Therefore, April 1st is his day. Court is
adjourned. "
Oh yes.
Although, I suspect I find it funny for reasons that are different than yours .
Happy fsmas
I don't know if any country on the planet has the right to equality for religious holidays like India does
http://www.worldtravelguide.net/country … India.html
Oh well, not to worry. The bus ad campaign started in London already. Coming to a city near you soon
Thank goodness we have lawyers instead of priests judging in our courts in England......
Hi Mark,
I guess you're the driver...Pls obey the traffic rules
Why? God will look after the righteous and move them out of the way. Surely?..............
Drive and observe the traffic rules and don't hit the poles...The bus looks wacky.
It is good that they cropped the picture, so it does not show the bus driving off the cliff, lol...
No, what is really good is you believing there is a cliff.
I bet you believe you have a job all lined up in the afterlife - Standing at the gates of hell saying -
"See, I told you so."
Merry fsmas. May you be touched by His Noodly appendage in the near future.
I am becoming quite a fan of this FS thing - who do I send my life savings to?
Why - me of course. I am His Anointed Representative on Hubpages.
The cheque is in the post, Angelic One. All 1 Euro and 32 cents.
Hi Noodlyness accepts all contributions withe equal love and acceptance.
Cheapskate
That is a considerable sum of money. It is the savings I made from this wonderful thing called Water for Gas. Apparently, it makes hydrogen from water. Amazing. I do not have a car, but fitted it to my neighbour's donkey. Never seen the old thing move so fast, and it definitely eats less hay.
Well, if you were truly interested in Hi Nodlyness' love and compassion, and genuinely repented and wanted to enter the Great Italian Eatery in the Sky, you would try harder and find more money to continue His work on Earth.......
And don't believe the Water 4 Gas scams my son. Reverend Misha will descend to explain in good time.
Give me a few weeks to sell my house, then aka-dj can organise the gold-plated statue of ultimate holiness. I can probably stretch to a couple of packets of spaghetti, too.
Come on now. Surely you will be able to change a few (simple) laws, and make it possible.
Maybe we can all make some extra money, as well as save the planet (no oil )
Oh darn, you missed your chance. I expected a "and I am sure you think the world is flat to make that cliff" reply. There you go using that Oxford dictionary again. Merry Christmas indeed.
And after a quick look at your hubs - I like yours too
One has only to wait a short while for the inevitable indictment of a "rouge judge"...do we remember the dishonorable federal judge, Roy Moore...the fool was disrobed primarily for lying under oath...and of course squandering the taxpayer's money on religious relicks...
Mark- FSMAS (I know from Christmas you have taken MAS but what does FS stand for?) I checked online and got this link (http://www.fsmas.org.sg/ )...LOL
Now don't tell me you were planning to raise such a huge bonfire on Dec25th that we need to avail FSMAS services...hehe
FSM = Flying Spaghetti Monster
The One True Religion
That was funny. I checked out that video and she is the Governor of my state (washington). Truly "What is sauce for the goose is not sauce for the gander." That guy Bill O'Reilly who grills others about ethics and morality seems so far fetched coming from him when he himself was involved in an immoral unethical sexual harassment episode: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar … Oct28.html
Maybe in 500yrs (if we ever get that far) Mark will be the founding "prophet" of a worldwide religion. "fsmasism". They may even erect monuments of a gold haired "angel" with a goatee and all covered in spaghetty.
Oh, and meat balls at his feet. (Vegetarian look-a-likes fo course)
Actually, I am looking to buy an old house here, and there is a chapel in the grounds. Do you think anyone will be upset when I convert it to pastafarianism?
Feel free. We have them everywhere here(abouts) already converted to art galleries etc.
Some are done up rather nicely.
Send me apicture.
PS I am a pretty handy person. Done quite a few reno's, I may have some tips for you.
There was a trend a while ago in London to turn them into pubs. This is one of teh nicest I have seen in Holland - a private house :
by M. T. Dremer 10 years ago
How can atheists improve their image?For whatever reason, the mainstream theists in the U.S. have trouble separating average atheists from the extremists in the news. Not all atheists want to watch Christianity crumble or start their own dictatorship. But how can we spread the image of a more...
by Cattleprod Media 14 years ago
I find most people are clueless. They say they are atheist, but can't properly form an argument as to WHY, or they say they are agnostic, with zero clue as to WHAT that is.Ignorance, above all, is our weakness. Not religion. Although ignorance and religion are good bedfellows.
by Eric Dierker 9 years ago
Is Atheism really just another religion or faith based concept?It seems like the notions that there is a God or there is not a God, are both founded in belief because there is not proof either way. Well there is proof, but not conclusive in either direction. So aren't organizations with set forth...
by aka-dj 13 years ago
bother posting AGAINST beliefs?If the Atheist can "convert" any believer to Atheism, then, they can be compared to evangelists who do it the other way.Any thought?
by Deborah Sexton 13 years ago
The best way to get out aggression is through laughter.Post your jokes here.No getting offended. Remember they are jokes. Don't take it personal..Its not always about YOU!
by Jes Mathias 13 years ago
...and so, we come to this point of reference.We can gather from massive ranting atheism is much a splinter faction, due to its roots in Christianity. But the question comes to mind, IS atheism attempting authentic Judaism?Well, what is an authentic "Judaist" and what is an...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |