This again, seems to be viewed in the wrong perspective.
It's ridiculous.
Is "taking in the A$$", per se, legal? In some states it is not legal even for man and women to perform that act.
In MASS, government officials had to abolish the that law, before they allowed 'gays' or 'lesbians' to marry.
It appears, the definition of sex needs to be refined.
And, for those who enjoy arguing about the fact that's it's not about sex?
That's precisely what it is about. It's not about LOVE or feelings.
It's about sexuality, your preference, which I've said before....doesn't afford you any more rights than you are already afforded as a "man" or a "woman".
You have a right to marry. However, based on "Federal" guidelines....Marriage is defined by a Man and Woman.
Why? Because the two together can multiply and create children, which grows society.
The other alternatives is to let chaos run rampant.
The primary reason for this FIGHT is about FEDERAL BENEFITS, which heterosexual couples receive.
So, who is fooling who?
Your rights------are AFFORDED to you and you can be stripped of them at any time, if it not in the best interest of society, as a whole.
This argument is almost borderline ridiculous, almost as bad that the rights of inmate who is to be executed "humanely", when he is executed.
An inmate cannot be sick, have a cold or an infecttion. Advocate groups have argue so much so, that "death-row" inmates have to be put to death humanely.
Enough said.