If Adam and Eve was the first two people, who did the sons procreate with?

Jump to Last Post 1-50 of 51 discussions (261 posts)

60
Miss Knowledge77posted 8 years ago
If Adam and Eve was the first two people, who did the sons procreate with?

reply report
68
wrenchBiscuitposted 8 years ago
Well, we can all agree that Adam is eliminated as a possibility. Many have argued that Adam and Eve produced daughters , and leave it at that. But I see no reason why Eve would not have been an option as well. I'm sure that in that time and place it would have seemed perfectly natural for mothers to mate with their sons, and for fathers to mate with their daughters. If you are the only people in the world, then you really have no choice but to get the party started any way you can.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Hey Ronnie! STOP it!
  Genesis 1:26 "...let THEM have dominion..." He created more humans than Adam & Eve but Bible has emphasis on the genealogy of Jesus!
  Yet there was incest! Why covered under 613+ Mosaic laws (Lev 20,21)!
  I just spoke of u
  reply report
2. 68
  wrenchBiscuitposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  We can assume that many people were seeded in the Earth at once. However, population would still be isolated in small tribes. As a result, I wager that incest was the norm. Didn't you ever watch "Deliverance?"
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  No! We don't "assume" (Gen 1:26 "THEM")! 2 Pet 1:3 "all thgs pertaining to life & godliness" is n Scripture!
  Nope, haven't seen "Deliverance!" Gal 2:12 "For I neither recv'd it of man, neither was I "taught" it, but by "revelation" of Jesus Chri
  reply report
4. 49
  bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Neither of the bibles were written or created by other than mere humans, and it took many authors contributing to it over several hundreds of years. The bibles were also not written contemporaneous with the depicted events in them.
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Well, if NOT "inspired by GOD," provide another book with as many ACCURATE "fulfilled" prophecies written BEFORE Bible???
  reply report
83
gmwilliamsposted 8 years ago

First of all, there weren't just two people on the earth. There were perhaps thousands.The biblical idea that there were just two people on the earth is pure hyperbole. So their sons mated with women outside their tribal group & multiplied the human race.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Bible's emphasis is on the genealogy of Jesus! Yes, there were more humans created than Adam & Eve (Gen 1:26)!
  reply report
2. 49
  bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The Old Testament is the basis of two and only two people. The New Testament doesn't apply to the question. There was no Jesus when the sons were supposed to be having wives.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Show how much you know about THAT SAME SPIRIT!
  JESUS is "alpha & Omega, the beginning & end"
  "Before Abraham was, JESUS was!"
  How do you explain that?
  reply report
4. 0
  jonnycomelatelyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Jesus was speaking of the "I AM." One-ness. The "Here and Now." Such has no beginning, no ending, it's eternal.
  It is only humans who distort what he said. You distort, Norine.
  reply report
5. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Cain wife came from Seth his brother
  Adam was 800 years when Seth was born Seth became the Father of sons and daughters at the age 807 years
  Seth lived to be 912 years. Enough space and good blood line there would be no birth defects
  reply report
6. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  J: Well, if there's "Oneness" & "such as no beginning & no end," JESUS was there in that SAME ONE SPIRIT! YOU distort Jonny!
  K&T: Cain went into NOD & wife ALREADY there & "He knew her!" Seth & children begotten AFTER Cain l
  reply report
75
Oztinatoposted 8 years ago
For an atheist to take a literal interpretation of the Bible, especially genesis, is illogical to start with. Such non sequitur premises are used by many atheists purely for the sake of mockery of entire religions. Such behaviour is not scientific, unethical and atypical of true atheist university level studies of religion. Sensationalist bigoted premises don't belong in serious discussions but are deliberately designed to "troll" discussions ie purely for the sake of offense and controversy.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Provide a book with as many "accurate" fulfilled prophecies written BEFORE Bible; otherwise, "mockery" displays complete "ignorance!"
  reply report
2. 75
  Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine
  I'm not sure ' if you have understood my point.
  Of course I can see correct prophecy in the Bible.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I did misunderstand! I re-read and do apologize!
  Yes, "mockery" & "trolling discussions" are "purely for the sake of offense and controversy!" But that's Satan's job (Jn 10:10) to "try & prevent TRUTH being told!"
  My apology!
  reply report
4. 49
  bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Without a literal and factual interpretation neither of the bibles is any more Godly than a mere fiction, or fable.
  reply report
5. 60
  Miss Knowledge77posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  First and for most I am not an atheist. Nor is my question meant to cause "controversy". Discussing the Bible and having questions is not a problem to someone who applies logic to their daily living.
  reply report
6. 71
  getitriteposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  So are u saying that REAL Christians never take the bible to be literal? And can u provide evidence where God says that we should take the bible allegorically or metaphorically? If u cant, then this is not a Non sequitur...but just your opinion.
  reply report
7. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Get: Matthew 13:10-13!
  reply report
8. 68
  wrenchBiscuitposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Empiricism is far more fantastic and delusional than The Book of Genesis. We cannot know for sure that 2+2=4. All knowledge is interpreted through our particular design. We have no perception, nor can we reason outside of that design.
  reply report
9. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  We MUST deny ourselves & everything we've learned in life!
  2 Chronicles 7:14 says "If MY people, which are called by MY NAME, shall "HUMBLE" themselves, & pray, & SEEK MY FACE, & turn fm their wicked ways, THEN will I hear fm heaven
  reply report
10. 71
  getitriteposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine, so should we take Mathew 13:10-13 allegorically too. Or do we take this verse only literal.If the bible is allegory, then it would seem that even Mathew 13:10-13 should also be interpreted to mean something other than what it states LITERALLY
  reply report
11. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  So Norine if predestine why do anything, why deny yourself if and go through all these changes and mental battles just to be predestine to die.
  This is not the case.
  reply report
12. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Get: IF one does not have the Holy Spirit to HELP, he can't "discern" which is which! Why I keep telling all to get GUIDANCE by WAITING for "revelation!"
  K&T: HE KNOWS, we don't! We HOPE! Heb 11:1 "FAITH is the substance of things HOPED for.."
  reply report
13. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine hope for what if you are destine to die. No need to do anything even hope if you are destined to one conclusion.
  reply report
14. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: We "hope" we've done what HE'S asked in WORD w/o "twisting" & missing anything but HE KNOWS "IF" we will allow Holy Spirit "reveal" vs "Leaning to OUR OWN understanding" (Prov 3:5) BEFORE we were born!
  GOD KNOWS ALL!
  reply report
15. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine if you are doomed because he knows what you will do .there is no need to add .your belief .your opinion
  Because you are doomed to die.as you are saying he already knows what you will do. Then there no choice.
  reply report
16. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't see u use any WORD here! Therefore, JUDGING!
  I give WORD, you give judgment, insult! Who does GOD LOVE; one who "judges" & insults or one who gives HIS WORD?
  If what I believe not IN WORD - I'd agree!
  U already know what I will do?
  reply report
17. 60
  bdn9385posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Hi Oztinato, could you help me assess hubs below if legit proof of God or not?
  http://hubpages.com/politics/The-maps-o … ohn-Part-1
  http://hubpages.com/politics/The-maps-o … ohn-Part-2
  reply report
18. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Also animals have names and yet we are more important , more valuble to God .And is our ancestory.
  reply report
19. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: Not if you are "devil's advocate" "rooted & grounded" in "twisted "man-made" doctrine! Gal 1:6-9= "ACCURSED!"
  reply report
0
Hanaveeposted 8 years ago
The word in the original Hebrew is not a man's name, Adam, but the word for "mankind," which is adam. Spelled the same in English, but two totally different ideas. And the word Eve does not appear. Instead, it is yitzah, meaning woman, or all females. Thus, when mankind and womankind had offspring, there were definitely more than just two people.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Amen!
  reply report
2. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thank God someone on here actually knows how to translate Hebrew.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thank GOD the Holy Spirit "translates" ANYTHING!
  reply report
4. 60
  bdn9385posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Agree.
  reply report
5. 68
  wrenchBiscuitposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Your talent with Hebrew notwithstanding, your explanation serves only to spare the frail sensibilities of the Christian mainstream who refuse to accept that incest was most likely in small tribes or isolated families. It does not answer the question.
  reply report
6. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ronnie where was there a law before Moses saying what incest was? Can you show scripture. This was established with Isreal and then they were the only ones binded with oath to keep their agreement with the true God.
  reply report
7. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: Ronnie was not saying it was "law," but Brian's response only "spared the frail sensibilities of the Christian mainstream who refuse to accept that incest was most likely in small tribes or isolated families" & didn't answer Q!
  reply report
8. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I think the whole idea here is to not take Adam and Eve as two literal people...
  reply report
9. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The idea here is "Disobedience leads to consequences!"
  Therefore, REMEMBER Galatians 1:6-9 {"ACCURSED"}!
  "Christians" MUST follow "Chain of Events" in Scripture or {"ACCURSED"}!
  reply report
10. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ashton could you explain why we should not take Adam and Eve litral?
  Interesting.
  reply report
11. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Because the original Hebrew word for "Adam" is not a name, it is a word meaning "mankind." the word "Adam" is a transliteration (not translation) of אָדָם . The translation of the [ transliteration ] adam, is "mankind."
  reply report
12. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Again, the Bible is MAINLY the genealogy of JESUS! So they were "literal" (Gen 3:20)!
  There's ALWAYS a Message behind the Message & the "whole idea here" is "Disobedience brings Consequences" (Gen 3:14-19)!
  reply report
13. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine, according to the original Hebrew from which the Bible was translated, "Adam" is not a proper name. It means "mankind." That's not my rule. It's basic Hebrew. Have you studied Hebrew?
  reply report
14. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ashton aren't you leaving out an important detail.
  Most names back then have defintions
  EvenJesus name meansJehovah is Salvation.
  Jehovah name means he causes to become.
  Adams name means mankind
  
  But how it is spell and sounds today is englis
  reply report
15. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ash: Did I not tell u the Holy Spirit tells ALL? Even in the "natural" after 65 yrs don't u thk I've heard it before? Why r u so "carnal?" When Spiritual, ALL thgs r "revealed" especially concerning HIS WORD! Man's knowledge can't compare!
  reply report
16. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Lois here is whats missing.
  The Hebrew term ’a·dhamʹ is also properly translated “man,” “earthling man,” and “mankind.
  So that is how and where we get and pronouce in English Adam.
  reply report
17. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  KissandTell, your statement is based upon a lack of understanding of Hebrew used in Genesis. There are ways to distinguish names from concepts. Otherwise the Bible would be intranslatable. Using Adam as a name is a huge assumption by translators
  reply report
18. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ashton the meaning had to have a root word. You have to admit the name sounds like Adam close to our speech.
  Meanings are not personal names. If I was just to call you lady or woman yes that is identity or gender but not your persnal name.
  reply report
19. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Kissandtell: you do not get me. To understand fully I'd have to explain Hebrew to you. Adam is translated (in the same book of Genesis) as both mankind and Adam. The meaning is ambiguous at best and should not be definitively translated as a name
  reply report
20. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ashton please explain why ? And who told you.it was ambiguous. I am open to listen. Thank you.
  reply report
21. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ash: Intellectualizing is against the WORD of GOD! One "takes over" the job of the Holy Spirit! Jn 14:26 says "HE" would "lead & guide us into ALL truth" & Prov 3:5 asks us to "Lean not to "your own" understanding!"
  Great! You know Hebre
  reply report
22. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  KissandTell: that would be great to discuss with you, but there's hardly room here. May I switch to forum? If not it's ok I'll find a way to explain here. The ambiguity is something you learn very early in studying Hebrew; there is quite a bit of inf
  reply report
23. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you I appreciate your answer and please do write me .Hebrew is important it is the key to inderstand .
  Thanks
  reply report
24. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  @kissandtell, thank you! I will write a thread @norine--if pursuing correct translation is intellectualizing,andGod is against intellectualizing,then God is against the very translation which you read. Ppl had to use intellect to translate.
  reply report
25. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  You don't "understand" the POWER of the Holy Spirit!
  It doesn't matter how Hebrew was translated by man, how they inserted "their opinion," how they left out Portions, the Holy Spirit will "reveal!"
  U (& anyone following u) underestimate GOD!
  reply report
26. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  How would this be revealed, Norine, except through more accurate translation? Every approach relies on the use of mans intellect. Is it not possible that the error is in the initial translation, which he is now revealing via added knowledge?
  reply report
27. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ashton Norine is on an attack mode .she can not understand you because her knowledge is limited. If she feel you know something she doesnt as you see she verbally attacts because that is all she knows. You can not make her understand you.
  reply report
28. 68
  wrenchBiscuitposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  When food is scarce humans eat each other. When sexual partners are scarce humans mate with members of their own family, and even farm animals. Ozzie and Harriet were created in the 1950's., and they still didn't exist.
  reply report
29. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ronnie very lnteresting very true. But that just means how much more humans need help with moral thinking.
  Most people you have listed just do not consider how their creator feels about their choices and conduct.
  So they just live how they feel.
  reply report
30. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: Yes, TRUTH does "attack" (Heb 4:12)! U deny GOD KNOWS ALL (Predestination), U deny HOLY SPIRIT can "lead & guide into ALL truth" (Jn 14:26), yet I don't KNOW anything?
  You're an "UNBELIEVER" for IT IS WRITTEN!
  Who's "attacking" the WO
  reply report
31. 31
  MovieMattposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  This is interesting Brian. God definitely uses symbols. Esther means Bride. Peter means Stone. People's names have great meaning. I'm curious if you believe that all the people in the Bible are not real people, but were they are all symbols.
  reply report
32. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ron: U r RIGHT! When ppl r "hungry" (lack knowledge) they "eat ("try") others!" If 1 is "anointed" Gen 12:3 applies!
  Ash: "Intellectualizing" causes human err & overrides Holy Spirit!
  Matt: GOD spoke in parables, etc.
  reply report
33. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  @Matt, not sure if the question is to me, but no I don't think that about all names. But there are ways to determine if something is a name. In Adams particular case, it's ambiguous, by the nature of the Hebrew @Norine trans. Requires ppl. Unavoidabl
  reply report
34. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ash: You apparently "think" you (man) have MORE KNOWLEDGE than GOD Who is the HOLY SPIRIT! Either you don't know the POWER of the Holy Spirit or "think" you are greater! Is there NOTHING impossible for GOD? You seem to "think" so!
  reply report
35. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine, I believe God also said be quick to hear and slow to speak. Attacking someone immediately without taking time to listen, does not display this.
  reply report
36. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ash: I've "listened" to u speak commenting on several Q's & ur responses comes fm a "carnal" standpoint! U don't seem to understand, when discussing Bible It's all fm the "Spiritual" realm (Jn 4:23-24)!
  Until then, we're in 2 diff worlds!
  reply report
37. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  You don't seem to understand that your current views of the Bible were made by translators. You have an english bible because of them. Of all ppl responding, you act the least like Christ.
  reply report
38. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  IF u knew how Holy Spirit Works, u wouldn't say these thgs! HE "reveals" ALL "lies!"
  If I give WORD, not me but GOD speaking! How u accept HIM (WORD), is up to u!
  Remember JESUS "tore up Temple" when ppl sinned! I haven't done that YET!
  reply report
39. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Jesus turned tables over when He got angry at the Pharisees, who did nothing but judge and condemn, as you are doing. Jesus loved and understood. Never cast stones.
  reply report
40. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  sh: When one speaks & don't KNOW Scripture, they LIE! GOD LOVES JUDGMENT!
  Google "Is It Right to Judge?" & READ "many" Scripture to confirm!
  "Catholic Faith" has "taught" MANY in err! Satan has used them to "confuse" most! Especially w/o S
  reply report
41. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  It's Gods duty to judge, not yours. Unless you make yourself out to be God. You assume that this is the incorrect translation because you have chosen to believe what people tell you. Study the Hebrew manuscript yourself, then get back to me.
  reply report
42. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Apparently you CAN'T READ or DON'T CARE just talking IF you READ "Is It Right to Judge?" Article which gives numerous Scriptures saying GOD LOVES JUDGMENT! Man has REALLY "twisted" your brain fm WORD!
  Get back w/me when "anointed" w/Holy Spirit!
  reply report
43. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Judge not, that you may not be judged. Judgement belongs to God. If you want to put blind faith in human translators of your Bible, you go ahead. I prefer to study Hebrew and read the original Bible myself. Yelling and insulting is not God's way.
  reply report
44. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Sorry Satan "taught" u (& u believe) "judging" isn't of GOD! IF u really cared, you'd READ WORD provided in Article not "man's" but "GOD'S!" U've not read anything but Hebrew? If 1 has "anointing" GOD (aka Holy Spirit) translates ALL languages!
  reply report
45. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Of course judging is for God. Judging is not for you, Norine. And you do realize that the original manuscript is in Hebrew right? I can read in several languages. But Hebrew is the original. You put faith in English translators. I do not.
  reply report
46. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I "put my faith" in the Holy Spirit (GOD) u do not! I keep telling u, "carnal" (u) vs "Spiritual" (me) so u can't understand! I Cor2:14 ""Spiritual" is "foolishness to u!" So it is as if a Chinese talking to a German!
  READ Bible on "judging!"
  reply report
47. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gods original words were given to the Hebrews. That is the source of your English Bible. So you condemn me for reading the original Hebrew Word of God? Be careful who you judge, Norine. Notice I have been respectful to you and not condemned
  reply report
48. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Ash: To me, u r a soul who knows Hebrew+! There is NO WAY (whether in Paleo-Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Aramaic, or ANY language) man is more knowledgeable than GOD (aka Holy Spirit)! I'm talking "G-O-D," THE ALMIGHTY & u're talking man's diff translat
  reply report
49. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Not at all. I'm talking about the original Hebrew Bible. There is less chance of translation error if you study the original. You see? Will God punish someone who is doing their best to find the most accurate representation of His words?
  reply report
50. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Yes! HE asked us to "Lean not to YOUR OWN understanding" (Prov 3:5)! HE DIED, sent Holy Spirit to HELP (Jn 14:26;16:13) & u say "Forget U I can do better?"How "UNGRATEFUL!"HE SAID HE would "lead & guide us into ALL truth" but if u don't blv
  reply report
51. 71
  AshtonFireflyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Not one of us has it exactly correct, for unlike you, I believe human translators can make mistakes, as they are human. You may put your trust in them if you wish. I take my leave now, for you act nothing like the God you claim to serve.
  reply report
52. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  U misunderstand! I don't put my trust in ANY man! Again
  MY FAITH IS IN THE HOLY SPIRIT as asked to do in Prov 3:5 unlike you who believes man's translations!
  GOD vs man? I'll take GOD (aka Holy Spirit)!
  reply report
53. 83
  My Esotericposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  When I think about such things, I keep two facts firmly in mind. The Bible is created from the minds of men to justify a particular religious belief system and that homo sapiens did evolve from earlier primates. That makes this question moot.
  reply report
54. 82
  Suhail and my dogposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  If this definition from Hebrew is correct, and I believe it is,then the two ensuing religions, namely, Christianity and Islam, screwed it up.
  reply report
55. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Then you guys need to provide a book with as many "accurate" fulfilled prophecies written BEFORE Bible if It was not "inspired by GOD?"
  If u can't, only "your opinions!"
  Case & Point: Holy Spirit tells "ALL truth" to ANOINTED "Believers!"
  reply report
56. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Now this is the REAL story of Adam & Eve. There really WAS NOT an Adam and Eve. About 300 years after Jesus died and rose, people started to lose him and were not able to reach him, so it got around that if they took a special "herb drug" they wo
  reply report
57. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Get back to that "pipe" or whatever you're on!
  Unless you can provide WORD, only LIE!
  Provide the book!
  reply report
58. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Only Jesus has the Authority to rebuke
  Now you judge and take over Jesus work and position .
  reply report
59. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  You are "TWISTED!" Did u not READ Lev 19:17? You just DON'T BELIEVE WORD! No matter What IS WRITTEN, you go w/"twisted" belief! You are an "Unbeliever!"
  Get thee behind me SATAN!
  reply report
60. 80
  PDXBuysposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  So God created a bunch of people all at once? Did a bunch of Adams all have to give up a rib to make a bunch of Eves? I didn't really get that from the Bible.
  reply report
61. 61
  BuddiNsenseposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Then who ate the fruit?
  reply report
62. 49
  Maryam Iqbalposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  dear people locate in originol bible and quran and then tell me who was the father of Jesus same here eve was a woman who birthed adam by her ribs and then their couple gave birth to sons and dougters plz locate in originol bible andquran to get ansr
  reply report
63. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Now this is the REAL story of Adam & Eve. There really WAS NOT an Adam and Eve. About 300 years after Jesus died and rose, people started to lose him and were not able to reach him, so it got around that if they took a special drug hidden in appl
  reply report
64. 60
  old albionposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  A first class explanation Brian. Thank you.
  reply report
65. 0
  jonnycomelatelyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  It's amazing how you can give a clear, concise, intelligent, knowledgeable answer to a question, yet then individuals with no intelligence outside of their narrow religious views refuse to hear your answer.
  reply report
66. 60
  daveh.pearlbposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The Hebrew word for woman in Genesis is better transliterated as ishah, the feminine counterpart of the more common word for man, ish.
  reply report
67. 59
  Harsh8313posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  www.mytourtips.com
  reply report
59
Kiss andTalesposted 8 years ago
The accounts in the bible tell us at Romans 5:12. The cure would be provided also by one man.
1Cor 15:21.
So we all as humans have genetically inherit death from Adam.
If God had created another man the way he did Adam direct we would not be here.
We sin and die like Adam
If another man was created then he would not have genetically the problem we all have. God could have easliy destroyed Adam and Eve after their betrayal but he did not to save their offspring us.
That is why Jesus paid the cost with his life for us.
Next how did the earth get populated. Through relatives
Not quickly. But there was no law that you could not marry a cousin or relatives.
Remember Adam and Eve also had other children who had children so they married cousins.
The next thing to remember is Adam lived without a mate for a long time. Then when he received a mate he still did not have children for awhile. It was after they sinned that children came into this world but marked by them. And we carry their mark of genetically we can die no matter even if we have good health. Our life force can leave the body.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gen 4:13-17 Cain left w/no one & went to the land of Nod. (v17) "And knew his wife" (which was already in Nod)! Where do you get these ideas? I told u the Bible emphasizes the genealogy of Jesus! Jn 21:25 "Books can't contain all thgs JESUS did!
  reply report
2. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  My Eso , that is not a good choice to believe. Because those so call primates as of today can not have an intelligent conversation of who their family tree includes. Nore can they tell you why they in up in somebodies zoo.
  No truth comes from them.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: "up in somebody's zoo?" What r u talking? People came from animals?
  If so, we see who "no truth comes from!"
  reply report
4. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine my statment was for esot. If you read his post you would not be posting the statement you just made.
  Which has nothing to do with you.
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  U r abnormal! Normal ppl respond under commentator! U responded under my name as if talking to me! Why r u "twisted" in most everything? Even commenting! If u comment under my name, I will respond due to ur typos!
  reply report
6. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Did I say Norine , No I said Eso. You are not the only one that make comments here. Again I use avaible comment space so I can continue to post all of my statement even though broken up.
  My comments will appear all togather on the feed a short time
  reply report
7. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  As in the word togather, I thought another "typo!" Let's not talk "trivia!"
  LOOK! I agree Cain mated w/sister based on Gen 5:4 which was not my "original" answer! LOOK & see how Holy Spirit sent one to tell me!
  I AGREE WITH YOU! Holy Spirit "CO
  reply report
8. 84
  Stella Kayeposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Think I'll have to unfollow this thread as it's just turning into a religious argument between 2 people now! You can argue ad infinitum and no one will ever know for certain so concentrate on your writing - life's too short - that is a certainty!
  reply report
9. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  And then "the judgment!"
  reply report
45
Ann810posted 8 years ago
Their were women in the Bible pregnant with siblings that were of different nationalities. Rebekah was pregnant with Esau and Jacob, 2 siblings with different nationalities. Genesis 25:19 - 26 Jacob and Esau's children was not really cousins but 2 nations. I'm not sure if they intermingled or not.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "...2 siblings with different nationalities. Genesis 25:19 - 26 Jacob and Esau's children..but 2 nations."
  Yes, 2 siblings who moved into different "geographical locations" & created "2 nations!"
  reply report
53
peter565posted 8 years ago
The mythology have change greatly since Jewish era and Christian era. The original story before Christianity, Adam and Eve were originally from a story of ancient Africa pegan faith.

In the original story, there many gods in heaven. Amount the many gods, there was one name Yahwha (AKA Christ), Yahwha has a son (later Judiasm name him Adam) Adam married a beautiful goddess name, who is a strong and independent woman. (Later Hebraw name her Lilith) But Adam is what we today refer to as a rich spoil brat and demand for Lilith to serve him, unwillingly, Lilith left and came down to earth, using mud, she created many human (thus in original story, man are not created by Christ, but by Lilith) because she is lonely, Angry Yahwha threaten to send floods and demons to kill Lilith's children if she don't return. Lilith said no, So, Yahwha send a giant flood to flood the earth and send demons. Lilith kill the demon and seal the portal in heaven that allow flood water to come, but by that stage, many of Lilith's children died. Lilith created a powerful dragon name Satan to protect her children and return to heaven, for her revenge, Because Lilith refuse to return, yahwha took a rib from Adam and create a woman to be his wife (Jews later name her Eve), Eve is innocent, Lilith transform into a giant snake and manipulate Eve to eat a golden fruit and let Eve to let Adam to also eat it, after eating it, the fruit turn Adam and Eve mortal and they was been casted down to earth by the other gods. Lilith then use her lust, to seduce Adam and suck try his life source, she then cursed Eve and cause her to have an abortion. An angry Yahwha see revenge on Lilith by punishing her children, so, the battle between Yahwha and his angels, led by Michael and Lilith and her dragons, led by Satan, continue.

In early story, Lilith and Satan was the good guy, Yahwha and Michael was the bad guy, but by Jewish era, it was reverse, because Jew believe they are children of Adam and Eve, not the creation of Lilith. Later, Lilith got wrote off, all together.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Well, since THAT ONE SPIRIT has the POWER to heal the sick, raise the dead, walk on water, drive out demons, "RECOGNIZE DEMONS", etc., what a MIGHTY GOD WE SERVE & HIS NAME is JESUS!
  Provide that book!
  reply report
2. 53
  peter565posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Oh boy, this religion nut again.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Only a "nut" IF you can provide "book!"
  Where is it?
  Otherwise, you're the "nut" believing man rather than GOD!
  reply report
4. 53
  peter565posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  blah blah blah blah blah
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  YUP! He who has "ears," let him hear!"
  reply report
6. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Example you go to college take up Auto repair.what is the point of going to class to learn the trade when the teacher is going to fail everyone that comes in the class.
  We all came into this world and God will not fail us be we will fail ourselfs.
  reply report
7. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Back to "predestination" are u?
  Give it up or you don't believe GOD is ALL KNOWING!
  reply report
60
bdn9385posted 8 years ago
The answer is covered on my latest hub. Check out below link.

http://hubpages.com/religion-philosophy … rld-Part-2
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gen 2:18. Adam was all alone.
  When created it was said in our image , not animal not plant. But the image of God as God is Love.His attributes.
  Animals are limited.
  Also all humans come from Adam because humans die. Only the seed of Adam dies
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  When they disobeyed, became "sin!"
  No longer "love" as GOD but "evil" (Ezk 22:30)!
  Yes, "seed of Adam (sinful man) dies" but THANK GOD for JESUS we now are saved by Grace through "Faith" (Eph 2:8-10)!
  reply report
3. 31
  MovieMattposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, God is Love. And Image is a physical likeness or representation of a person, animal, or thing, photographed, painted, sculptured, or otherwise made visible. So when He says image he's talking about a physical likeness, not just His attributes.
  reply report
4. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Matt: Let me us one of those Words GOD used "FOOL!"
  GOD is a Spirit (Jn 4:23-24); therefore, the "image" HE speaks of is not physical! How could IT be?
  "O FOOLISH" Matt (Gal 3:1)!
  reply report
62
Angele Parrisposted 8 years ago
Atheists question the logic of the bible, especially the book of Genesis, while Christian try to provide logical answers to the events in the bible.

Genesis 1 :26 & 27 states:

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

The "us" means that there were more people with God. Thus the beginning referred to in Genesis, was not the first beginning of creation.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Remember, GOD is a Spirit (Jn 4:23-24), Who "manifests" in "GLORIES" (I Tim 3:16; Jn 17:5)!
  We have nothing to substantiate "..Gen was not the first beginning of creation."
  If not in Bible, not True (Rm 3:4)!
  reply report
2. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Angel there is another way we can understand this. When God said let us make man in our image .that meant his dominant attributes. God is love. Every Human loves something even if it is food .but human love humans.
  Animals are different and Limited
  reply report
3. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Angel another way to understand is at
  18 And Jehovah God went on to say: “It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him.”
  Adam was by himself along time before Eve was made.
  reply report
4. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, GOD is "love," but man became "sin" (no more "love") when disobeyed! No more in "His image!" Why He had to come (I Tim 3:16) to give us way back to Him!
  We don't all "love" as GOD intended!
  "Carnal vs Spiritual" LOVE is BIG difference!
  reply report
5. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Sorry Lois but your name was also on mind .the last comment was to Ashton.about Adams name.
  reply report
6. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: You're an "Unbeliever" & the "devil's advocate!" U have been "rooted & grounded" in your "twisted" doctrine which is AGAINST GOD'S WORD!
  U need to "STUDY" for yourself (II Tim 2:15) rather than listen to "man made" doctrine!
  reply report
7. 31
  MovieMattposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine, remove the mote from your own eye. Angele, you got it right.
  reply report
8. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Matt: I give WORD! If there is "mote" in WORD, you are an "Unbeliever!"
  reply report
9. 0
  jonnycomelatelyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Lois, will there ever come a time when you can let a discussion progress with listening to answers before you butt in with your HS BS?
  You show no intelligence or compassion or humility.
  reply report
80
The Indexerposted 8 years ago
Every civilization has a creation myth, and the Jewish one is very similar to some others in that a first man and first woman give rise to the whole human race. Of course, stories grow in the telling - they begin orally and only get written down at a very late stage - and the end result is unlikely to make perfect sense. There are, for example, two very different Adam and Eve stories presented in the early chapters of Genesis.

The important thing is to understand the message of the myth and not take it literally.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Well, it seems as though you need to provide a book with as many "accurate" fulfilled prophecies written BEFORE Bible if not "literal."
  reply report
2. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  She also has been known to call you unchristain names under the subject and conversations of Jesus.
  Please do not get discourage I like how you answer.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: John said "...a creation myth, and the Jewish one is very similar to some others in that a first man and first woman give rise to the whole human race."
  U call the WORD OF GOD "a myth?"
  I rest my case! "Devil's advocate!"
  reply report
4. 31
  MovieMattposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine, what is with all the name calling just because someone believes differently than you? Christ didn't go around telling everyone they were devil worshipers just because they were mixed up with some of their beliefs.
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Matt: I'm glad u recognize their belief is "twisted!"
  Read Matt Chapter 23 ("Scribes/Pharisees/Hypocrites"), Gal 3:1 ("Fools"); I Thess 4:15("Ignorant") + when "twisted!"
  RELIGION has taught "love" but TRUE LOVE (GOD) is TRUTH (WORD)!
  Heb 4:12!
  reply report
6. 60
  cr8iv1posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine it is just the attitude that you show John has the world wondering what is different between Christians and the world! By which measure yea judge so shall you be judged.A terrible thing to be fall under the Judgement of a Righteous God!
  reply report
7. 45
  Pacesetter Abbeyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The fragility of a man is a result of his guilty conscience. Words that don't describe you shouldn't bother you. I understand that Norine Williams can be sometimes forthright, but some words only hurt because it's the truth.
  reply report
8. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks Lawal! TRUTH "hurts" (Heb 4:12) but is LOVE (GOD;Lev 19:17)! Jesus was not "loving" to THE WORLD! HE said "Think not I bring "peace" but a "sword" (Matt 10:34)!
  reply report
9. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  John you are correct that every civilization has a creation story.
  But the wisdom is of understanding is just like a person says a fire happened in their own words .and another says it happen in another language in their own words .A fire happened.
  reply report
10. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "John you are correct that every civilization has a creation story." How many "civilizations" did GOD initially create which is re: Q?
  We differ so much in thinking! U thk diff cultures, I thnk GOD'S initial creations (Adam/Eve)!
  Why? GOD vs man?
  reply report
74
yecallposted 8 years ago
Now, this certainly is a troubling question and I don't believe the answer was clearly given. I do, though think that there were angels around, who were charmed by the beauty of human women. So, there is that.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "...let "THEM"..." (Gen 1:26)!
  If not true, how did Cain "know his wife" that resided in Nod (Gen 4:16-17)?
  There's your answer!
  reply report
2. 45
  Pacesetter Abbeyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  WHAT!!!
  "Angels around charmed by human beauty"???
  If you are in any way referring to Gen 6:2, you are wrong. Angels don't relate with flesh, they are spirit beings!
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gen 6:1-4 speaking of "sons of God" (righteous humans) "took wives of ALL (unrighteous women) which they chose." (v4) "when the sons of GOD came in unto the daughters of men.." And created "unrighteousness" (v5) "And GOD saw that the wickedness..
  reply report
4. 73
  Levertis Steeleposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  These angels were most likely the fallen angels who were cast out of heaven with Satan. God's holy angels were perfect.
  reply report
60
roselinsojanposted 8 years ago
Adam&Eve are God's own people.but there are other people in this world.but God loved Adam&Eve more than anybody else and selected them as his own.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  GOD "created" Adam & Eve but once they sinned, REPERCUSSIONS (Gen 3:16-19)!
  That's why HE had to come (I Tim 3:16) to reconcile us back to HIM (Rm 5:12)!
  reply report
84
Stella Kayeposted 8 years ago
Their sisters or their mother would be the only logical answer
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Cain wife was an anonymous daughter or grand daughter of Adam and Eve (Seth child)
  Gen 4:10-15 compare 5:4
  Cains lived to be 920 years .long enough to had married from distant relative.
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  K&T: Do u see where Seth was begotten AFTER Cain "knew his wife" & went to NOD?
  Gen 4:16 "And Cain went out..& dwelt in the land of Nod..." V17 "And Cain knew his wife..."
  V25 "And Adam knew his wife AGAIN; & she bare a son, &
  reply report
64
BryanChaseGentryposted 8 years ago
The modern day man-made false doctrines and its many religious leaders of the world have all become completely blinded themselves. Many people will sit around to watch the many greedy and get rich television preachers such as the false teacher Joel Osteen. Mr. Osteen's many little blind followers will swallow up everything the greedy man says hook, line, and sinker. its much like a cotton candy and lollipop church circus to make one feel good. People fail miserably at ever doing any of there own independent research to verify what the preacherman is saying to be actual, factual, or truth. Often times after researching a sermon one will find that the preacherman has taken the words of the book out of context, shortned the words, or even added to. The truth is Adam and Eve were flooded out in the flood and everybody else died too. The only people who survived the flood were Noah, his wife, there three sons, there three sons wives, and all the animals upon the ark that Noah built. After the flood waters were gone and the flood ended. Noah and his family began procreating from that point forward.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "STUDY" (II Tim 2:15)
  "CHAIN OF EVENTS" in Scripture for yourselves (II Tim 2:15)!
  Noah & family had "the blood of Adam & Eve running through their veins "from that point!"
  reply report
59
Trisha Harrisposted 8 years ago
Taking I literal Biblical account, which I take, we learn in Genesis 5:4 that Adam and Eve had sons and daughters. Up until chapter 5 it only names 3 sons but we have no idea just how many sons and daughters they had in total but in all likelihood a lot. They were commanded to be fruitful and multiply and there was not a whole lot of activities to do at that time but work and have sex (no tv to watch lol). It is not until the law of Moses that people are directly commanded to not have sex with siblings. It is gross for us to imagine because it is so foreign to us but scientifically speaking and taking the biblical account into perspective Adam and Eve would of been created genetically perfect. They were created directly by God in perfection. After the fall and creation becoming contaminated by sin it would take generations for the gene pool to become more and more contaminated until it was absolutely forbidden for siblings to sleep together.
reply report
1. 45
  Pacesetter Abbeyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Exactly!
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  But was Adam & Eve only male & female created initially? NO! When Cain went to NOD "alone" (Gen 4:16) immediately thereafter (Gen 4:17) "And CAIN KNEW HIS WIFE" which indicates "wife" already in NOD.
  reply report
3. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 7 years agoin reply to this
  Tisha Harris, now hold up a second here... You are grossly misinformed! Adam & Eve are not 2 people. Just to make things simple, the Bible writers made them two people. It was really thousands of people. God did not just create two. Think about i
  reply report
45
Pacesetter Abbeyposted 8 years ago
Good question! In Genesis 5:4, the bible says "After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters." In the context of this scripture we can see that 'Cain' and 'Abel' were not the only children Adam and Eve gave birth to. According the tradition from the beginning of time, people marry their relatives and this was because of the Sin Adam and Eve had committed in the garden of Eden. As time went on, people stopped marrying their siblings/relatives, which is exactly what the bible preaches. So Cain's wife is literally his sister, who is one of Adam's daughters.
In case you missed it, read Genesis 5:4 again ""After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters."
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Lawal READ Gen 4:16 &17 "Cain left for NOD & immediately (V17) "knew his wife!" Therefore, wife ALREADY in NOD!
  Seth wasn't begotten until AFTER Cain left for NOD & "knew his wife!"
  We have WRITTEN WORD & Holy Spirit to determine!
  reply report
55
Bert Dposted 8 years ago
Simple, the Bible says in Gen. 5:4 that "he begat sons and daughters:" meaning that those weren't his only children. In fact, after Cain killed Abel it says that they begat another son and called his name Seth. Apparently they intermarried.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  How do you explain Cain LEFT (Gen 4:16) & "dwelt in the land of Nod" (v17) "And knew his wife?" So he went back to get wife & THEN "knew her?" Get Real! Then "built a city" (v17) where he "went back?" Y'all don't care what's in WORD! STUCK
  reply report
2. 53
  Enquiring mind78posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  To clarify, Gen4:10-17 is clear Cain was approached by God&cursed&marked,told the ground would no longer yield its produce to him, he was to wander all his days, he begged mercy&was allowed to take a sister as wife&live in land east o
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks for clarification! Your comment aligns more with WORD than any other!
  Although not in Scripture (Cain took a sister as a wife), it coincides with Adam & Eve being first and only male & female creations!
  Thank JESUS for you!
  reply report
4. 55
  Bert Dposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks Inquiringmind for covering me. What I said did need some clarification. You knew what I meant but I should have expounded on that a little more.
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  AUTHOR: Still defying the WORD? Still playing the devil's advocate?
  Read my Q "What do you think of Heb 12:25!"
  reply report
69
rolaabboudposted 8 years ago
Well, according to the Islamic beliefs. Adam and Eve were both alone in this earth, then they started having children, Eve had twins in each pregnancy - a boy and a girl - the next pregnancy were twins too and so on. After the children grew up each boy married a girl but not his twin sister but the sister from other twins. That happened because of the need of special provisions according to the case. Such marriage was forbidden later by prophets because the amount of population was increasing and people do not need that kind of marriages anymore.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Now where is that in Bible? "Islamic beliefs" came AFTER Bible & "ADDED" and/or "TOOK AWAY" fm HIS WORD (Rev 22:18-19)!
  Who do u believe, the creation or the CREATOR? If Islam, provide a book w/as many accurate "fulfilled" prophecies written BE
  reply report
2. 69
  rolaabboudposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I am not a christian scholar nor a priest to talk according to the Bible. I am supposed to talk according to my religion and beliefs not someone else's beliefs.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  If "your religion" defies the ORIGINAL Scriptures, then you need to take a 2nd look, especially if it goes against "org" WORD & was created by "man!" II Kgs 17:29;31-42!
  What book has as many "accurate" fulfilled prophecies written BEFORE Bible?
  reply report
4. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 7 years agoin reply to this
  Now you are getting a little warmer, but not quite. Back then the minds of the asses were simple, so the writers of the Church texts/Bibles simplified it so the rabble could get it like children. Adam & Eve were not 2 people! It was thousands!
  reply report
80
emgeposted 8 years ago
Interesting question which is generally not thought off. Obviously, one can say that the only source of procreation must have been Eve. But again it's too simplistic an answer, and the real answer may not be there as the entire story is a myth without foundation.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Provide the book!
  reply report
2. 59
  days leaperposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Might be a metaphore for something beyond your thinking!
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "..a myth w/o foundation" Yet "a metaphor" has a foundation & in WORD it's ALL CHRIST which IS "beyond your thinking" for IT'S "ALL" SPIRITUAL!
  reply report
59
days leaperposted 8 years ago
Thank You Hanavee. Your answer rings true. As a Christian. I never believed that incest was OK'd. If Those so called Christian read on. Doesn't it say something about 'people who 'went with' angels produced giant offspring? Until God said enough of this and separated the two 'realms'. Surely that's enough evidence that others existed. It's now stupid to believe in one of each sex.
Though How much easier was it to avoid with the 2by2 in Noahs time. Or is Noah actually not a man but a tribe or something all told to build an arc each?? Please give if there is a translation.
DL / Days...
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The Holy Spirit sent "Inquiring Minds" to HP to clarify! Read his comment under Bert D!
  SEE? I told ALL the Holy Spirit will "lead & guide us into ALL truth" (Jn 14:26;16:13) even when IT comes through "man!"
  Thank you Jesus!
  reply report
61
dianetrotterposted 8 years ago
Their sons procreated with the sisters. It was not a sin back in the day. Leviticus 18 set the law on whom not to lie with.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't see how Cain "knew his wife" if not already in NOD but Gen 5:4 says Adam & Eve had girls too so it's apparent Cain took a sister (wife) w/him!
  Further evidence, "Noah" offspring of Cain who murdered Abel (Gen 5:29)!
  reply report
2. 61
  dianetrotterposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  There are family trees/diagrams online that show sisters and brothers getting married. Laban and Rachel were brother and sister. Jacob (Rachel and Isaac's son) married both of Laban's daughters (Leah and Rachel) Leviticus 13 is when prohibition st
  reply report
62
travel_man1971posted 8 years ago
That's my question, too. Adam denotes mankind and it's not singular as we may usually think.
reply report
1. 59
  days leaperposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  It stands to reason. A translatory error. Perhaps by assuming because christians have the word it would mean the same in Hebrew. Or perhaps all early translations have the word. So it just got left.
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  II Peter 1:3!
  reply report
61
MichaelMcNabbposted 8 years ago
People in the Bible are not what you and I call people. Instead they were God's people and the others didn't matter. The purpose of the story is to show the start of God's People not all of us. That's why when gen. 2 24 says "a man leaves his mother and cleaves to his wife" well just who is this referring too since this is only gen 2. 24 right???? Obviously a major flaw in the genesis story of the 7 day beginning am I right or what? Of course I am..
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "MAINLY" the genealogy of JESUS!
  reply report
2. 61
  MichaelMcNabbposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  No not the genealogy of Jesus since there was no Jesus
  reply report
3. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Micheal where did the name Jesus come from .who created it ?
  If you can give more exact details in your belief then we have something to go on.
  reply report
4. 59
  days leaperposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  And yes. Or what? Prophecy being the prediction of the future when it comes true. And these people earned the right to be called God's people because they have done a significant amount of work for all mankind (includes women as 'kind of like...)
  reply report
5. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Leap: "Prophecy"=of things to come to "man's knowledge" BUT GOD "already KNOWS" & IF we "look" in Scripture IT'S already there!
  II Peter 1:3 says "...EVERYTHING pertaining to "LIFE & GODLINESS" is in the WORD of GOD!
  MM: WORD says "no JESU
  reply report
6. 54
  Josephin Tonyaposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  very good
  reply report
74
Robsthe1posted 8 years ago
HA! I have been asking this question since I first heard this story at age 2!

Here's one possible answer ~ The Gap Theory(?) The Bible does not talk about Cave Men, and yet we have fossils and proof that they existed. The Gap Theory concludes that Adam and Eve's offspring procreated with the cavewomen that are probably talked about in some lost book or book that was not included in the bible: http://www.gotquestions.org/gap-theory.html

Makes sense. ;-)
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The problem is people mix cave man with stages of the Ape.
  No the bible is very clear Adam and Eve had a Job they were to name every animal God created as they appeared to Adam.
  They lived in paradise garden all was provided.
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Rob: Jn 21:25 "there are also MANY other thgs which Jesus did..the world couldn't contain in books.." BUT Holy Spirit (beyond u?) "leads & guides into "ALL" truth" (Jn 14:26;16:13)!
  Why ALL need HIS "HELP!"
  reply report
3. 57
  orderscoterieposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Great
  reply report
60
fauletteposted 8 years ago
probably with their sisters...its the only logical explanation
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gen 5:4!
  reply report
2. 59
  Ranitdasposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  yes
  reply report
80
Electro-Denizenposted 8 years ago
Is the premise for this question actually valid?

Surely it's best to start from the bottom... looking into ancient Hebrew to understand the terms, as well as looking into other creation stories from other religions.

Otherwise it becomes a strange and bizarre world where whole intellectual edifices are bolted onto... not very much at all.

Only then might it be possible to understand what these creation stories are getting at.

I remember studying theology (Christian) at college and was amazed how huge intellectual disagreements by grown up people, were centred around ideas that were just as relevant as any kind of fiction.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Are u not body, soul & "spirit?" Were u not "created" fm THE SPIRIT (GOD) & will return? If you don't "believe" this, u should provide "the book?" If u do "believe" this, you need to "STUDY" HIS WORD "in Spirit" to relate to "HIM!"
  Otherwis
  reply report
2. 80
  Electro-Denizenposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Exactly... and study should be done in the sharpest way possible, while abandoning everything at the doorway of meditation. Doctrinal religion... is like a strange shadow of the past that still haunts our societies.
  reply report
3. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  The "Gospel of Christ" has been given in Scripture "AFTER THE CROSS" & IF we don't preach ONLY, Galatians 1:6-9 applies!
  
  Blessings
  reply report
72
Oscarlitesposted 8 years ago
The bible we have is only part of the books that recorded history. I feel that one owes it to him self, or herself to read the lost books of the bible and the forgotten books of eden. If I may humbly remark and then ask the question, why do people hide from history? when the words of the bible written, saying don't ADD TO OR TAKE AWAY FROM THIS BOOK, actually more volumes existed than we have in our common bible today. so those who closet themselves to the narrowed down version, limit themselves from knowing many events, history, and much more. the lost books record fairly accurately adam and eves life and journeys outside the garden.. how they learned to live, other family members, etc.. why would you accept traditional and denominational fears or taboos against the rest of the writings? my heart races with excitement when I read about things such as how adam learned to survive in caves and how to use and control fire, spears, and to protect themselves from animals and their diet and their spiritual journey, yes they had a type of walk/ journey that they lived and it is recorded well enough in the lost books and forgotten books. they are just as valid as the bible we have, but not cannonized or accepted in many churches... I wonder what GOd will say to us one day.. you had much more you could have read about my world, my people.. ... people are scaredy cats sometimes and very controlled by organized religion, because it in itself has been ravaged and torn and restructured to fit each successive civilizations preferences..
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  You express some very good points.
  And thank you I appreciate your good manor of expression.
  I really think through it all the bible has not lost its treasure no matter how people have tampered.
  Like a gold bar if scratch it is still gold.
  reply report
2. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  TRUE! But I BELIEVE "WORD!"
  Listen, to Jn 21:25! We know ALL not there BUT WE (TRUE Christians) BELIEVE Jn 14:26; 16:13 "will lead & guide into "ALL" truth!" Don't u hear? "ALL Truth?"
  Either one BELIEVES "ALL" of HIS WORD or NOT CHRISTIAN!
  reply report
64
Perspycaciousposted 8 years ago
Such questions and debates as this one will persist as long as God's ways are not man's ways.
That mankind developed from the dust of the earth, and that when humans were developed into the image of God and at that point were given spirit (as in Michelangelo's famous painting) I accept as both evolved and "created."
That there was an original human father who had children with a human mother, seems obvious.
That they had children of both sexes by God's design seems equally obvious.
That some children of one sex procreated with some children of the opposite sex is obviously the way all children are created.
The debates over Creation vs. Evolution, and which sons with which daughters can go on and on.
You only need to resolve those questions for yourself and keep or share your answers as you please.
I am satisfied with the answers I have arrived at for me..
reply report
81
CarolynEmerickposted 8 years ago
I would think Miss Knowledge would be better with grammar.
reply report
66
lawrence01posted 8 years ago
it has been shown from research into Genetics that every man and every woman on the Planet descend from one male and one female. National Geographic have a couple of excellent YouTube videos on the subject although they originally dated them at 200,000 years ago and 60,000 years ago respectively.
Recent Research has suggested that they both lived around 20,000 years ago and were contemporary with each other (original research said maybe they weren't).
So science no longer questions the idea of an "Adam and Eve" but does still ask the question of where they came from and how, were they 'original creations?' like the Bible says (it got the fact that there was an original couple right!) or did they 'evolve' from an earlier as yet undiscovered species?
The big problem with evolution is that for one species to 'evolve' from another is that it would require adding to the information in the genetic blueprint of each 'original' species. That requires an outside source for it to happen (the information has to come from somewhere and can't happen 'by chance!') and the real argument is where the source of the information is!
Back to the original question, if you allow for creation then you can also show that mankind was created without blemishes in the gene pool hence there would not be any genetic imperfections in the first Humans and there would be none of the later issues that have arisen from 'genetic inbreeding' as the principle of 'atropy' had not yet taken effect hence Adam and Eve's sons and daughters mating with each other while it might sound strange or 'wrong' to us it actually had no harmful effects on the Human gene pool (unlike wht it would do today).
Even if you accept the evolution model you still have the fact that we are all descended from the same couple hence their sons and daughters must have mated with each other no matter which way you look at the issue, that's what both science and the Bible logically say!
I do have a couple of hubs that deal with the issue of evolution or creation if you want to have a look further.
Lawrence
reply report
1. 80
  PDXBuysposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  But it does NOT require an "outside" source - at least not a God, if that is what you mean. Genetic variation can happen for a variety of reasons but in nature the primary cause is "chance". Remember, the concept of "species" is a man-made concept.
  reply report
2. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  PDX no God did not have to take ribs from every man. Which you have just uavailed a wonderful truth. Why would God need a rib from any others born from them .Adam was not made to birth but Eve was. After Cain and Abel born. Only two needed to create
  reply report
0
LoliHeyposted 8 years ago
I think they had other children after Cain and Abel. They had Seth, so they probably had others as well, some daughters.
reply report
1. 66
  lawrence01posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Spot on!
  reply report
52
Phil Stallposted 8 years ago
In light of the scientific proof that the Biblical "story" of creation is so unbelievable and creates so many unanswerable questions, like this one, frequently arise. Then dozens of well meaning people provide what they feel are are "true answers" and the confusion continues because we are all descendants of microbes or whatever and Adam and Eve are fables of numerous religions and these "Belivers" spend their time disagreeing with each other. As a former United Methodist I consider myself a "Pan-Millenialist". IT WILL ALL PAN OUT IN THE END!
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Centuries from now some one will say the same about you.
  But does that make you a fable ?
  reply report
2. 66
  lawrence01posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Phil
  Look up 'Genetic Adam'and 'Genetic Eve' you'll be surprised what science really says (it says they were real people and the ancestors of every Human being!)
  reply report
65
Leslie_Siegelposted 8 years ago
Now this is the REAL story of Adam & Eve. There really WAS NOT an Adam and Eve. About 300 years after Jesus died and rose, people started to lose him and were not able to reach him, so it got around that if they took a special "herb drug" they would connect, so in the secret meetings they had back then the drug was free flowing. The Roman Empire found out and just like here, they banned it regionally. So how to get this drug to the people???? OH, make up a story about Adam and Eve and only those who were in the know and those in the meetings knew that the secret drug would now be hidden in apples, which were always being sent back and forth from county to county back then. So when a couple thousand apples were sent to territories, the drug was hidden in them, thus the story of Adam & Eve. Simple. It was a code story to tell them where the drug was. The Romans who stopped the apple sellers were not cued in, and so they got away with it, and thousands of years went by and the story got in as a Bible story. That's the truth.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  WOW! What "herb drug" are you on?
  I don't see anyplace in the Bible that "the tree" was an "apple tree!"
  That "stuff" must be "potent!"
  reply report
2. 66
  lawrence01posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine.
  That's a common Western idea. The Jews think it was either an Orange or Pomegranite tree! But there's no need to be rude.
  reply report
3. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Lawence thats interesting because after they ate from the tree it said they covered themselfs in fig leaves Gen 3:7.
  we are to be christ like if we are christs followers can you hear Jesus calling people fools,ignort, drug users
  No! Its not loving
  reply report
4. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Again, my idea that the story of Adam & Eve is because of the disconnection that the Roman Catholic Church caused by shunning the rabble they saw as heathens. Sad, but the drug was needed, so they used an apple, or whatever it was, apple, orang
  reply report
5. 66
  lawrence01posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Kiss
  It's one of those mysteries! You can't exactly cover yourself with leaves from either the Orange or Pomegranate tree! Maybe what tree it is isn't that important as what it shows.
  reply report
6. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Law: Who cares "Western idea?" Not WORD! Rude when NOT WORD? Lev 19:17="REBUKE!" K&T trying to "ADD" when IT says "tree of knowledge!"
  K: ANYTIME Word in WORD "Fool, Ignorant, hypocrite, demon" IF "following Christ," we use!
  Eyes open to sin/dis
  reply report
7. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Those who love christs follow his words that say.
  Eph 4:29
  Let a rotten saying not proceed out of YOUR mouth, but whatever saying is good for building up as the need may be, that it may impart what is favorable to the hearers.
  Yours not favorabl
  reply report
8. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  "Not favorable" to whom? You?
  You call GOD'S WORD "ROTTEN?" I give WORD which includes "IGNORANT" "FOOL" "HYPOCRITE" "BACKBITTERS" Anything sound familiar or have you not READ WORD?
  Satan, I "REBUKE" (Lev 19:17) you in the NAME OF JESUS (Zech 3:2)!
  reply report
9. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine Williams I know my scripture and doctrines. The Bible and other church doctrines are written "VEILED" or "CLOAKED" for naysayers like you. People needed that drug, it came inside an apple. It was rewritten as Adam & Eve like a cryptic mess
  reply report
10. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Well, then you know we are to live AFTER THE CROSS, observing the apostles, baptizing in the name of Jesus Christ, doing as Paul said for Salvation?
  If you do, you are one of few on HP!
  Otherwise, you don't!
  reply report
11. 65
  Leslie_Siegelposted 7 years agoin reply to this
  It's was Peyote secured from John The Baptist's people. When the Bible was being put together, ithe cactus herb was changed into an apple. This is in THEORY ONLY!. I've tried & experienced it Peyote good results.
  reply report
59
txthornposted 8 years ago
Their Siblings. Eve was created from the rib of Adam which means Eve was already born out of him. His blood line. God said be fruitful and multiply. All they had was each other.
reply report
80
PDXBuysposted 8 years ago
The most logical answer is that Adam and Eve were NOT the first two humans. Since man evolved from other animals there was already a large population when our ancestors reached a level of biological complexity we now call the species Homo sapiens (modern man). Sorry, but the Bible (as commonly translated) is pure mythology.
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Then provide another book written BEFORE the Bible with as many "accurate" fulfilled prophecies!
  reply report
2. 73
  Levertis Steeleposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  On time!
  reply report
3. 80
  PDXBuysposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Norine - It is not clear that the Bible predicted anything. It is extremely vague.
  reply report
4. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  YOU would say "vague" since you believe "pure mythology!" Keep living and you will see more "fulfilled" during your lifetime then you will see if your analogy is right!
  Provide book & vagueness!
  reply report
75
Kathleen Cochranposted 8 years ago
This is an old question. The Bible is God's revelation to us. It doesn't account for every, single thing that has ever happened. Can God create a stone so big he can't move it? What's next?
reply report
1. 51
  Norine Williamsposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Jn 21:25 "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen."
  reply report
2. 73
  Levertis Steeleposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Yes!
  reply report
53
therealxoposted 8 years ago
the was another place aside from the garden called the land of nod so there wasn't only multiple people but mulitple places
reply report
73
Levertis Steeleposted 8 years ago
Long after Adam and Eve, we read that siblings and other near kin did marry each other until God forbade it. Abraham married his half sister, Sarah. Isaac married his cousin Rebecca. If Abraham married his sister, it should not be surprising that Adam and Eve's children probably married each other. We human beings often think that God is governed by laws. A thingis wrong or right because He says so. God can make anything possible. He created genes and DNA. If he says siblings can marry and procreate in one age, they can. If he says they can't in another age, they shouldn't. If they do, they reap consequences like the royal Hapsburg family who ruined their offspring by constant inbreeding. The bible may seem like a myth to some, but those prophecies in it have almost all come to pass! Choose your following; that's your right. I choose the Almighty Creator. That's my right. Good choices and peace to all.
reply report
56
Kenza-Salmi2posted 8 years ago
....It goes without saying that it is a miracle that god creates..researches can proove nothing concerning such topics..Only God knows the reasons behind such a miracle ..Adam is the first person on Earth then Eve was created...Quran can explain all these things ..
reply report
1. 59
  Ranitdasposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  o
  reply report
2. 56
  Kenza-Salmi2posted 8 years agoin reply to this
  ...This is the reallity... We have to be more educated and never comment on others' words by " 0 " . It is what I believe in ..You are free believe in whatever you feel right , I dont care..But we HAVE TO try to learn HOW to respect others.
  reply report
59
RouxBaron309posted 8 years ago
This is very tricky question at all just like who comes first a hen or a egg.
For more visit Kamagra http://www.pharmacystorerx.com/
reply report
49
sobia mansoorposted 8 years ago
To start the world GOD has send these two people in the world and then put some genetic qualities in them from which people of whole world spreads around
reply report
0
The J Phronesisposted 8 years ago
the sons procreated with their sisters.

I assume that you assume that sibling marriage or intercourse was prohibited at this time but if so, then your assumption is wrong. Sibling sexual unions became prohibited after man sinned against God and began to slowly die (genetic mutations and degeneration)

Also, after the fall at this time, descent was recorded according to the male lineage, so the daughters of Adam and Eve and many other important figures in the Torah and Holy Bible were omitted. It did not mean that they did not exist.

I hope you asked the question above for the right reasons, and that I did answer your question.
reply report
61
Luther Seedposted 8 years ago
Adam and Eve are black in this picture. That is awesome! lol
reply report
62
Matthew Woolseyposted 8 years ago
I'm not 100% on my history but I remember hearing something that Adam had a wife before Eve named Lillith. And she was sort of a demon and got saw she was bad a banished her from thr garden. Perhaps she is how Cain and Able reproduced. The woman lillith is where thr word lullaby came from ,but the stories weren't aboud rock a bye baby. Threy were horry stories to scar children into going to bed of following direction. It surely be har to believe that Adam,Eve,Cain and Able were incest. But like you said the bible don't mention how the world populated
reply report
1. 77
  ginjill ashberryposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  I have read this myth. She was said to be a vampire too. But the truth is as stated in the Holy Bible.
  reply report
74
ms_independentposted 8 years ago
Genesis is just a creation myth... it's not supposed to be taken literally
reply report
57
cinders rauhleeposted 8 years ago
From how I learnt the story Cain and Abel were not the only children Adam and Eve had. They had two daughters and each brother married the other's sister.
reply report
1. 62
  Matthew Woolseyposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  so we all come from an insect family?
  reply report
77
ginjill ashberryposted 8 years ago
Miss Knowledge, this is a question I have asked a long time ago, about the same time I questioned God's son saw human's daughter as beautiful(Gen6). I asked people and surfed the internet for answers. I found those answers and the answers are many and differ from one another.

But regarding your question; based on the Bible, i believe that Cain's wife is one of his sister. Remember that this is the beginning of human creation. When Eve gave birth to Cain, she said, "I have bring forth man". I think that other children were born and they were female and it was not mentioned in the bible before Cain. And yet again, other children male and female were born within Adam's lifetime. One of his daughter must be Cain's wife=his sister. Remember Lot? when there was no men for his daughter to procreate and continue the family line; his daughters slept with him. This is only my speculation.
Here in Hubpages, there are many who are well versed in the Bible and theology and might have 'The Right Answer' that both of us might benefit by.
reply report
60
Tushar Farukposted 8 years ago
UC Browser Download
http://ucbrowser.pagedemo.co
reply report
82
tamarawilhiteposted 8 years ago
Their daughters mated with their sons, if you assume they were the only humans.
reply report
1. 59
  Kiss andTalesposted 8 years agoin reply to this
  Gen 5:4-5 Adam and Eve had more then just Cain and Abel. They lived to the precise age 930 years and when he was eight hundred years he fathered sons and Daughters .So no body had to sleep with sister and brothers. Cousins ,
  reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

12 Next

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

If Adam and Eve was the first two people, who did the sons procreate with?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

If Adam and Eve was the first two people, who did the sons procreate with?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies