I'm not religious but I was brought up in a catholic family. I developed my own thought and points of view and I don't think I fit in religion. I just wanted you to share what your thoughts are on religion.
There are some problems in our life but i can tell you that is just a challenge. A challenge from "GOD". God wants to know if you have strong faith on Him. If you read a bible you will know many thing about God.
I believe in the Creator God who has no wife, no son and no daughter.
He has a children. But His children are those who believe in Him.
So those who don't know about him, or aren't as educated as you and thereby don't have your religion, all die in the fires of hell, or get torn limb from limb by a flying tooth fairy?
Am I close?
I suppose I'm agnostic. We just don't know do we? And never will whilst we're alive.
I think the general idea is to try and make a decision before we find out whether the decision we did not take was the wrong one!
Still with the fear mongering huh? I can smell the fear through my screen.
No fear there BB, least not from my keyboard, what would anyone have to fear?
If there is nothing after life, then there is nothing, nothing to fear, nothing to enjoy, just nothing.
If there is something else after this life, then there is something, something to fear, something to enjoy, but something.
Me, I do not fear either scenario, as for anyone else, they need to decide for themselves whether the do or do not feel fear at he thought of leaving this mortal coil.
How do you stand on the issue?
Sorry EG, I thought you were in Beezlebub another persona, my apologies Mark, it's hard to keep track!
So, what you're saying is religion is like russian roulette? You think one is right, not sure which one. You just grab one and hope for the best?
Not quite that simple.
What I am saying is that NOT making a decision about something so relevant is kinda dumb.
If one decides there is no God, then ignoring the whole religion thing is the way to go, for they will not want to waste their only life arguing about something they are certain does not exist.
Why would they?
But for someone who is not sure that God does NOT exist.... then I suggest they make the effort to get one side of the fence or the other, that's all, no Russian roulette.
Indeed not being sure but still pulling life's trigger with uncertainty would be more like Russian roulette!
What I suggests, asks the unsure to examine the gun and see where the bullet may lie before putting it to their head.
For me, I came to faith in Christ and unloaded the gun, now the gun is just a reminder of when I used to play Russian roulette with my eternity.
I suppose that's one way to look at it. The way I see it is there is no way to make an informed decision. All of the religious claim truth, but they all disagree.
I'm not unsure. I'm completely at peace with the question. Yes, it is a question; but I assume that if there is no god it doesn't matter. If there is a God, then I am in the only place I could logically be expected to be at this moment. If there is a God and we are made in his image he could surely understand.
The question of eternity doesn't cause me any consternation. Hell makes no sense. But if there were a God and hell was an option, would I want to spend eternity with a being that consigned people to it because he chose not to provide concrete information so humanity could make informed choices? Probably not.
Whatever awaits one, awaits all. It's the only equitable answer.
That's the 'Kismet' approach, 'Que sera, sera' and if you are content to wait and see, so well and good.
The item that made me decide to investigate fully, was the statement "I am the way the light and the truth, and no man (or woman) will come to the Father except through me"
Big statement, and not one that I could dismiss unless I could definitely dismiss it.
The more I delved trying to establish that it was not relevant to my life, temporal or eternal, the more I realised that it was.
I would hope that, in the end result, God would judge people in the way you hope He will, but having read the 'small print' can see some serious difficulties in assuming that.
God (for a start) does not think as we do, He tells us that His ways are NOT our ways, He may have created us in His image, but as a proficient Photoshop user, I can tell you that I can corrupt, change any image you give me, in other words, just because we started off in His image, does not mean we are a reliable guide as to what God thinks or how He will act in things.
God is JUST...... not FAIR.
You and I would probably allow someone to spend eternity with us because they shared their sweets with us in the fourth grade, or stopped the bully picking on us in the changing rooms, but I suspect God is looking for something deeper to decide upon.
God looks at our heart, at how we have lived, whether we have lived for Him, or US.
Now you may think that unreasonable, that He demands we live for Him, not ourselves, but from Gods perspective, seeking to share His creation for eternity with His people, knowing WHO His people are is kinda important, so we get this opportunity to decide whether we want to be His people or not.
That's what we are deciding, and if someone decides that under those constraints they do not wish to spend eternity with God, so well and good, He will oblige them.
Now I cannot comment on where folk who reject God would spend their eternity, but it would OBVIOUSLY be somewhere that God did not frequent, after all, those folk would not want God there anyway, so imagine for yourself what that would relate to.
For my imagining I looked at what God had created, then looked at what man had created from what God had given us as building blocks, and decided man made bad things more often than he created good ones.
So, take one space, subtract what God created, leave behind what man has created (from Gods materials) and (for me) I could see what eternity without God could be like.
But that was not my deciding factor, for me the deciding fact was that God is really kinda neat to be around once you get to know Him, plus He tends to deal with all those bad aspects of your life that previously one struggled with.
I enjoy being with Him, and serving Him ,and knowing that it's only going to get better as I learn how to do His stuff more.
Awesome, John. That really wakes me up!
The founder of Christianity talked frequently about the place of "wailing and gnashing." As a child, I long wondered what this could mean. My "hellfire and brimstone," Southern Baptist minister grandfather did not answer this question to my satisfaction. I studied science and many other religions before I came to my present, and as yet imperfect understanding.
In a purely "action-reaction" world of Newtonian physics, blood feuds are a perfect example of "wailing and gnashing." The wailing of the victims of violence, and the gnashing of the teeth of the perpetrators of violence. Fear and anger. All too frequently, the wailers of yesterday become the perpetrators of tomorrow.
Would civilization last without a spiritual aid? Who knows? There's a very strong possibility that it wouldn't. Once such spiritual aid is withdrawn, all those left on Earth would be left to the purely physical law of action-reaction. One breakdown in the infrastructure of civilization and humanity might not be able to recover because of the "wailing and gnashing" factor. Without the transcendent actions of forgiveness and unconditional love for all, humanity would likely fall into perpetual fighting on the edge of brutal survival.
That's during any lifetime. Between lives, each individual soul would likely find no solace or guidance, but would be left to the nightmares of their own creation. As a sleeping immortal, such dreams would be powerful and painful. And there would remain the inability to wake up unless one is reborn into a new Homo sapiens body.
In a few million years, as the sun uses up more of its hydrogen and becomes more chemically rich with elements like lithium, the temperature on Earth will rise significantly. If humanity has not killed itself out long before this, the incessant rise in temperature will ultimately kill all life on Earth, making it into a lake of fire. From then on, the souls would never have a chance to wake up from their nightmares. Homo sapiens would have disappeared, and with them, all chance of the souls' own awakening.
It isn't a question of what will be, it is a statement of what is. We all see how the world is. The question, to me, is whether I am going to make things up, or not.
Almost everyone has experienced spiritual moments. But, those moments for me do not support anything as presented by religion. They are completely contrary to the concept, to be honest.
My point is not to trivialize your belief system. It is to say that religion attempts to trivialize the experiences of others on the topic. My non belief in your god is not a denial, it is an affirmation of what I know to be truth. When religion talks of hell it is an insult to my truth, just as you consider mine an insult to yours. The difference is mine is not presented in the form of a gentle threat if you don't agree.
Emile, I do not consider what you state to be a denial of MY religion, 'cos it ain't MY anything, I have no possession over it!
If you have found your truth, that's great, I will not attempt to challenge what you know to be true, it's exactly in the knowing the truth that we are set free, i.e. whatever you believe to be true will set you free from indecision and vagueness, both of which bind people in the lives they choose to lead.
As for gentle threats of hell, well if what I describe sounds like hell to someone, then so be it, for to any avowed God hater, total separation from all things associated with God should sound like heaven!
I don't see anyone as a god hater. Maybe concept of god hater. But, I'll admit that I have read posts on this forum by those who call themselves christian whose idea of god I have an intense distaste for.
Well fear not, if they are wrong, God will let them know about it!
Like the book states, He is no respecter of persons...
God will bring folk to account sooner or later, and most everyone who comes on board at a mature age will be have been radically saved at some point and preach hard for a period until they settle into their new life, when they may get to be a mite more loving and less hard hitting.
What matters is YOUR idea of God.
That's funny, because I've always thought the important question that helps a person the most from a spiritual perspective is their ideas of their fellow man. Their reflections on the question of god are usually a mirror image of that.
Those who love humanity imagine a loving God. Those who see the bad in humanity imagine a vengeful one. It's an interesting window.
Interesting, you see I know a loving God, but I surely see daily the bad things in humanity.
How to reconcile that?
God shows His love daily, humanity show their badness daily.
I choose to live with my loving God, the folk who tell me about a vengeful God tend to be those who seek to disparage God.
This God you see loves you. Has offered a relationship to you. Has withheld himself from others and, in so doing, has consigned most of humanity to hell. I don't see that as a loving god. Sure, he might love you, but not humanity. Can you not see the irony of saying you worship a loving God?
The only way for most to get into your special heaven is to take your word for it because god loves you enough to let you see the 'truth' but not them. All evidence is hidden from everyone but the select few?
We disagree and there is no way for either to claim truth. But, can you not see the arrogance in your stand? Would you even think to believe me if I claimed your soul was in jeopardy? You'd call me mad.
That is stated about as clearly as words can be used.
Now the replies will reveal no logical conclusions, or address the solid argument you have made in any way.
The best I can hope for is another pile of old scripture or another form of goddunnit.
Logic. The first thing to overcome for religious belief to grow.
I know exactly what the religious will answer to that. I'm spiritually dead, so of course I can't see. They're saved and I'm not, so of course I don't know. Or (and my least favorite) someone will post a thousand words of scripture.
I'm not even sure why I'm arguing the point. I think the choose or burn comment made me forget I'd decided not to let an exchange go past a post or two.
I'm the proud patriarch of a large family sans religious madness, and have a strong motive for wanting to see it stay that way.
The only duty I have is to ensure nobody closes their beautiful minds.
We are not getting religion from the schools my daughter has chosen, and the little ones are afraid of nothing.
No one hits them, or tells them they are evil or puts them down.
I did not hit my kids, and they don't hit their kids, with patience born of love, there is no need for corporal punishment. People lose patience with little ones because they do not "get" how love works. I see it at the supermarket all the time, some little child being dragged around screaming because mom can't make time to get to the root of the problem, because something else she needs to do is more important. I know what is important and so does my daughter.
My youngest grandson has anger issues at times, and my daughter stops and hears him out. That is usually all that is required.
When we lived in the city I played cricket with my 6 year in our small back yard. I would move the cars, and make enough room to make a full length pitch.
We broke the kitchen window about 5 or 6 times. We just laughed and replaced the window. No blame, windows are cheap, and it was much more important to ensure my child had fun than worry about a window.
He became a good cricketer, playing for 3 of our better inner city teams.
The kids come first, stuff comes second in our household, and the people we know understand that giving our kids religious guilt is banned.
I don't get the religious guilt trip, but I wasn't exposed to it and I didn't raise my son around it.
I don't have any problem with the concept of God, but it was never more of an idea when I was growing up than the Great Spirit. It was assumed to be everywhere, but that was pretty much it. It wasn't watching and waiting to punish anyone.
I can't, for the life of me, understand why anyone would be drawn to the ideas that are preached on this forum.
Isaiah 14:3. And on the Day that the Lord shall give you rest
from your consternation,
from your anger,
and from the heavy servitude of your enslavement;
4. You shall relate* this proverbial tale about the King of Babylon,
and say, "How was the ruler deposed,*
and the insurgent overthrown!"
5. The Lord broke the staff of the depraved,
and the rod of the ruler,
6. Who beat the nations without warning,
with blows that could not be repelled,
and he exiled the nations with contempt,
and wiped out those that did not submit.
Well, obviously there's no need to explain that.
Isn't it obvious, though? Wouldn't an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving creator of everything absolutely smite all those who refused to submit???
Well said Jonathan, that is about the usual type of response one would expect in rebuttal.
Ironically (and maybe the poster knew it) he has quoted, or misquoted, the section of scripture where the bad guy gets his just rewards for abusing folk and is cast down.
Must have been inspired posting!
Anyhow I thank him for bring the Word to the forum!
I just spotted the usual mindless violence, and was unconcerned as to who it was directed against, I have seen it before.
Context Earnest, always context, or the truth gets obscured, and we would not want the truth to be presented as perversion would we!
Content aqua content!
the content of the bible is demonstrably psychotic and appeals to the lowest common human denominator.
John 3:16
Amplified Bible (AMP)
16For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life.
Yeah, see what you mean, really 'psychotic'.....
Your first mistake was thinking you had truth. Second one was claiming to speak it within some sort of context.
Someone told me God doesnt make mistakes.
Im trying to believe that
Actually, I didn't misunderstand you. But, I am not shocked that you think I would misunderstand you.
I came looking for the last words that you spoke and here it is ..... What you just said above.
????????
You held your own didn't YA!
Don't know if it is true or not!
BUT < heard it said one time ... and I believe it !
The last words a person speaks just about says it all.
If a lot of people think you speak nonsense - you might want to consider another possibility.
Hi Cagsil, that's the good thing about opinions, you are entitled to yours, me to mine and only time will judge us.
Hi John,
And, you would be no different than any other believer. Not knowing which end is up. I hope you make yourself proud.
Oh no Cagsil, never make oneself proud, I hope to leave that to those who think they are self controlled and driven by logic.
How strange. You seem so very, very proud of yourself and your Invisible Super Being. I am confused. This pride you exhibit - is this different to the pride you accuse people who do not believe as having?
Could this be the reason your religion has caused so many conflicts?
I beg your pardon? What makes you think I do not have a life?
OK, get a life that does not revolve around deciding which mask to wear and which forum post to haunt like a ghost wailing in the wind.
Ah. Back to lying about me I see. I wear no masks, I just choose to use a single persona in order to protect the integrity of my work.
Just because I speak the truth about your religion and the conflicts that people like you cause, that does not mean I do not have a life. Nor will I give you the free pass you desire. Once upon a time religious rabble-rousers such as yourself got a free pass because they would kill any dissenters. Fortunately - this is no longer the case and you cannot burn me at the stake for not agreeing with nonsense and asking you to stop spreading the hatred.
I can see why you are so angry at me though. This is why your religious beliefs cause so many conflicts. Your religious beliefs. You.
Be a man. Take responsibility for yourself.
But it's the same old song.....
I am not angry at you Mark, that would indicate I actually cared about your antics, I am BORED with you, and your repetition of the same old same old trite rubbish leads me to indifference.
Who do you think would be bothered to attack the 'integrity of your work' in a religious forum?
To the non believers you are a god, to the believers you are a commercial hack who writes successful blogs for various people who obviously cannot write themselves, then spends his downtime being a mosquito attacking elephants in the forums.
As far as I know NONE of the believers who publish here actually do it for money or commercial gain.
Not surprised!
Look at how many of them publish anything? Most are just here on a writers site flogging their religious beliefs.
Really, take a look at their work, most of the prolific religious writers do not bother with the forums as they are hostile places occupied by snipers who just want to disturb any discussion, but I see plenty of new hubs by believers daily.
I am 8 hubs less than you in number, but you have posted 22,446 posts in comparison to my 2,129 posts, so who is spending more time in the forums than writing?
You see, what the snipers want to do is working, believers cannot be bothered to deal with your rubbish daily and so they get on with writing their religious hubs.... OH! hang on a moment, maybe that was not the snipers idea, to get believers to publish more hubs, whilst all the time the 'commercials'are moving house in order to get better income elsewhere....
Hmmmm... maybe God does have a plan for this place!
My general statement stands.
I did not include you specifically so that is all your own work.
I do comment a fair bit on many forums, and after almost 3 years they add up.
I see you have difficulty seeing the difference between writing on a site and flogging a religion on a site, but to me that stands out like dog's round ones.
Of course it is the same old song. The truth. The fact that you choose to ignore it does not change that fact. Nor does it change the fact that - as soon as you stop pushing your religious threats - I will stop saying they are nonsense. See how that works? You keep pushing threats and hatred - I keep explaining why it causes conflict and ask you to stop doing it.
I was pretty sure you would choose to not understand why I do not want to reveal my self and what I write about. Oh well - that is the problem with believing the nonsense you believe - it affects your ability to reason quite badly.
Do you think that is the reason your religious beliefs cause so many fights? Your religious beliefs. You.
Then we are at an impasse, still at least my forum comments are varied and apart from when you manage to successfully change the topic, interesting to those who follow.
Fortunately I will be travelling again soon, so will not have time to waste here, and you can continue pouring out your drivel unexposed.
Whatever Mark has to say, I feel confident he will have other adversaries here aqua.
No doubt about that, just not me for a while, off to Philippines then Thailand so will be too busy to spend time here until I get back and bored of being at home again!
Stay safe and enjoy the banter, and be assured I just like ribbing Mark as he tries to rib me, and I guess we are both successful at what we do when we rib each other.
Some simple amusement for bored folk!
I am well aware that there are people who love to see you repeat the same threats over and over. You know - making the "right" choice to believe - just in case the Super Daddy will burn you. We already know he will burn me because I deny the holy spirit exists and that is an unforgivable sin.
All I am doing is trying to get you to understand why these constant threats cause conflicts. Firstly - you are in no position of authority and secondly - this psychotic god does not exist. So - scaring children with tales of fiery hell is pretty low. Child abuse in fact. As far as I am concerned, it should be illegal like other forms of mental abuse.
Have a safe trip and try not to abuse any children while you are gone.
I live in a country where telling anybody about Christ is illegal, and I'm in countries where I will not have time to discuss anything but business with those I meet.
Fear not Mark, the world is safe from my preaching for the next few weeks, and you can continue on your campaign to take God out of society.
But how to remove God from hearts
Dont worry Aqua , I ,for one will not be bored talking about Jesus.
Enjoy your vacation ,oops sorry work.
Spreading the hatred will always be top of your list as well huh?
Seems like telling lies is on the top of yours!
Find one post of MINE where I sound hateful ??
It is your majik book that you believe in that is hateful. Your religious beliefs are hate filled. I bet you hate the sin not the sinner - right?
I dont spread anything hateful ,so perhaps it in your own intereptation of Gods word that is in question.
Like I said a long time ago ,NOT believing in God takes a whole lot more faith.
And there you go. Being condescending as you are doing now is where the problems come in. Being told garbage about myself by some one as educated as you appear to be is hateful and offensive. So - yes - you are hateful. It takes no faith at all to not believe the nonsense you say you believe. Trust me - if you could see yourself from my perspective, you would understand. You are just about living proof it is all nonsense. I do not interpret god's word - it is nonsense and I do not believe in a god - I look at the demeanor and behavior of self professed believers.
C'mon aqua, cut Mark some slack, he has rightly pointed out that he is not advocating anything and disagrees with those who insist they have evidence for a myth being truth and can't understand how others can't see the elephant in the thimble here.
I know how he feels to some degree I think.
Mark is obviously not a fool or ignorant and those who have said that of him should know him better, but don't seem willing to find out who he really is which is a breeze with google.
How silly it is to say those things about him simply because he is unwilling to agree with a set of beliefs he finds morally abhorrent as I do also.
That is the reality of a biblical belief that encompasses a megalomanic exclusion clause
It is constantly held over those who don't wish to join in the select band of the soon to be perfect and eternally living believers.
We mere mortals crawl from spittoon to spittoon awaiting an eternity of torture.
Not nice, not smart.
Earnest, over the last two year I have grown to appreciate yourself and Mark and several other non believing hubbers who try to rag folk in the forums. Frankly I try to stay out of the forums, and this incursion will be brief as well, for I am about to get busy again.
To you guys, God, Christ, the bible, they are all myths and you are entitled to hold that view, and no human being will ever change your opinion, just like no human being changed mine.
Mark telling me that MY religion causes wars is like you complaining that I am responsible for my country of birth committing your countries ancestors to transportation. We were fortunate (or maybe unfortunate) not to have been transported ourselves.
It is pretty obvious that my ancestors never took part in the Crusades, for two reasons, firstly few of them came back, certainly not of the peasant stock, which my family come from, and secondly Crusading was strictly a Catholic affair, and I suspect that my Danish ancestry were pagan whilst my Irish genes would have stayed in Killarney doing whatever medieval Irish peasants did.
My Grandfather was regular army and fought in WW1, and my dad was conscripted and fought in WW2, but neither of them were religious, my great great grandfather was a chimney sweep and not taken to fighting wars, as far as I know he never left London.
So whining on that MY religion causes wars is rubbish, and frankly I am bored of the same old same old, so I become less tolerant of someone who ONLY whines on in order to divert any sensible discussion away from topic.
Mark is advocating something, he has for ages been trying to broker a deal that is IF we will stop speaking about Christ, he will stop mithering away incessantly about his nonsense.
Not a deal worth discussing.
"unwilling to agree with a set of beliefs he finds morally abhorrent"
Fine, so isolate us from your presence, do not grace us with your company, avoid people who are believers of such abhorrent viewpoints.
Just stop hounding us then complaining when we don't roll over and play dead for you.
The religious forum will continue to (surprisingly) attract religious people to discuss faith with each other.
If every religious hubber stopped visiting today, next week a new crop would appear who would probably fall for your gangs stunts designed to disrupt.
Speaking personally, I do not need to put up with that, so infrequent as my visits may be, I will stomp all over your 'black panther party' (Forrest Gump) and make no apology.
I like both you guys, but your behaviour is just a pain in the rear end for all of us who actually come to the religious forum because we like religion, and would like to enjoy a civilised conversation that extended between pretended illiteracy and vain repetition.
God "consign" you to hell? Emile, please! God does no such thing. You consign yourself; God is only giving you a way out.
In your imagination. My question is, why is your mind so dark? I would never wish that on you or any other.
You get on an small plane, half way through the flight the Captain informs you that the plane will crash in a few minutes, and offers you a parachute.
Is this in his imagination?
Is his mind dark?
Or is he trying to offer you a safe way to get back to safety alive?
Perception, it's all a matter of perception, if you perceive no threat, you cannot see any threat.
If you were on that plane with a small child, say three years old, would they understand the danger?
So experience can allow others to be able to offer sound advice to those who for whatever reason, cannot recognise the danger.
I would say that NOT informing someone of the danger was a more despicable action... imagine, the Captain tells you 'Don't worry, there is no danger' because he is blind to the danger himself, or thinks that telling you the danger exists would be 'threatening you' into wearing a parachute.
Take the parachute (after all it's free) or do not accept the parachute, but please stop shooting the messengers.
You are comparing something real (Aircraft) to something that is only perceived as real (God). Airplane crashes are something that can be proved as a real danger. Hell can not be proven as a real danger. Comparing these two things is not a valid argument. To pose a valid argument, both sides must know and be able to prove their argument as facts.
Shooting the messenger? Is that how you see it? So, you have a right to an opinion. You have a right to share that opinion. But others do not. Because you assume your opinion is truth and mine is a falsehood.
What if I ran around interjecting an opinion that you would all be flayed if you didn't recant. Would you appreciate it? Would you be shooting the messenger to ask what the devil was wrong with me?
This is the problem aquasilver. You ask for more respect than you are willing to give. You offer a threat of hell, with no proof of it. But ask me to not respond when this threat is directed at me.
If I had not reached a point of 100% belief that my relationship with Christ is the truth, I would not be speaking of it as an 'opinion' in the first place.
This automatically assumes that therefore other 'opinions' must be incorrect, or that even if my 'opinion' turned out to be incorrect, and another opinion 'more' correct that that which I held, the consequences for me would be of no significant difference.
So, if there is NO GOD and life just ends... my 'opinion' loses me nothing, for there is nothing to lose.
If there are many gods and all things are acceptable to them, then in such a tolerant pantheistic state, my 'opinion' would be as good as anyone else's.
If there is a monotheistic God, but it's not the God of the bible, then I would be in dire trouble, but I have spent sufficient time in relationship with my God to satisfy myself (and others) that the ONE TRUE GOD is the God of the bible and His authority is currently vested in Christ. So the Muslim god Allah has no fear for me
Scripture states that we are to study to be approved, and I do not take this to be that we need mankinds approval, but Gods. I seek no earthly approval, why should I, if folk see me as having something to be seen as approved, so what, I crave no glory, and if folk dismiss me and disapprove of me, so what, I seek only Gods approval, for all other 'approvals' are worthless.
Ego seeks glory, ego is our enemy.
I would be thanking you for alerting me of the possible danger, and examining your proof texts that led you to reach that conclusion, to ascertain whether you were correct in your analysis and understanding of them. If you were correct, I would recant and change to meet the requirements you had discovered, if I saw you were incorrect, I would discuss the issue with you and anyone else I could find who held and 'opinion' until I was satisfied that I was wrong and recanted, or we agreed in the matter.
That is what a logical mind would do when confronted with fact that may or not be true, in that instance you keep digging until you establish a truth you are prepared to stake your very life upon.
Firstly, I have not mentioned 'hell' to you, I have merely described the place I imagine would exist if God were NOT present in that place, how you perceive that place is more or less what we are discussing.
I can offer you no 'scientific' proof that such a place exists, and indeed were you a hell-fire preacher, I could offer you significant scriptural 'proofs' that 'hell' as described by hell-fire preachers may well be a figment of Catholicism, but I can espouse that logically, if God exists, and if He is omnipotent, He is obliged to create a place where those who do NOT seek fellowship with Him for eternity can 'hang out' and by default, that place, in order to NOT infringe with their rejection of Him, must be somewhere that He will NEVER go to nor exert influence and control.
Logically therefore it is OUR individual choice to go there or not.
Where is the threat?
How can I threaten that God will send you to spend eternity where you have chosen to go, to a place where the God you rejected will let you be with your chums for ever and will never again interfere in your existence?
I ask for no respect, respect is earned by association and confirmation of worthiness, we do not know each other and therefore apart from common decency, owe nothing to each other.
I respect that you are tolerant, open minded and prepared to debate without resorting to inane gestures and infantile half language that seeks to belittle your opponent, but that respect comes from observation and relationship, albeit limited to this forum.
I seek ONLY that whatever you decide for yourself will be with your 100% knowledge that YOU are correct in your 'opinion', for we live or die by our 'opinion's'.
A financial investigation company I once worked for had a motto:
"A decision is ONLY as good as the facts it is based upon"
It has stood me in good stead during the last 20 year of my walk with Christ.
I wish you well, and pray that you will reach a definitive 'opinion' that you are 100% satisfied is correct, and will be prepared to defend to the death, your death, not any opponents.
The ultimate test for a believer would be when the Antichrist Gestapo threaten to kill them unless they 'recant' and at that point every believer will establish how strong their faith and trust in God is.
Men do not die for beliefs, they die for certainties that they cannot deny or recant for they know them to be true. All of the apostles died by the hand of an angry Antichrist state (with the possible exception of John)when all they needed to do was 'recant'.
May your intellect guide you well.
With respect,
John
Just to address a few of your points; You say you have not brought up the subject of hell. That’s not entirely accurate. These are a few of the comments from our conversation;
If there is nothing after life, then there is nothing, nothing to fear,
What I suggests, asks the unsure to examine the gun and see where the bullet may lie before putting it to their head.
God’s perspective, seeking to share His creation for eternity with His people
As for gentle threats of hell, well if what I describe sounds like hell to someone, then so be it
God will bring folk to account sooner or later
God "consign" you to hell? Emile, please! God does no such thing. You consign yourself (this from ls, but you moved in quickly to defend it, so I can assume it is in line with your stand.
I would say that NOT informing someone of the danger was a more despicable action...
These are threats of the repercussions in store for those who do not agree with you. You can call them anything you want, but you seem to be a reasonable man and it is only reasonable to take the statements as they are presented.
As far as I can tell, there is a belief of a continuation of life that runs through the minds of most of mankind. If this is true, as I would like to think, then if you follow that line of thinking you must believe that the force behind it is benevolent.
Religion moves to take the benevolence out of the idea from the moment of its inception. It begins with the premise that only a few are worthy. I see no logic in that. When you take every belief structure and find the unifying thread and observe the most spiritual people within each faith there is no condemnation. There is no ‘us against them’ philosophy.
The problem I have with this is that all of it is open to interpretation. Whether you study, or not, what you are left with is your personal understanding. It does not make it the will of a God, it makes it your philosophy. If you doubt this, please explain how Christianity ended up with tens of thousands of denominations. These are people following the ideas of individuals that are the result of their personal study of the texts.
And, any Christian who was truly concerned with nothing but God’s approval would not be debating the issue. I don’t remember anywhere in the gospels where the crowds were told to go out and debate the issues taught. I don’t remember where the apostles were told to debate with non believers. Quite the opposite. So, it is ego that drives our discussions. Little more.
You seem like a nice guy, so I can only take you at your word on this. But, you have to understand that the Bible is not unknown to others. I have read it, and come to my own conclusions. Your interpretation is yours. It does not make your understanding anymore valid than mine. You cannot expect others to reread the material and alter their conclusions because it would suit your agenda. And that is what it boils down to. It is not the agenda of a God. If it were truly important to an omnipotent god, there would be no room for interpretation.
This is little more than an argument to push someone into looking until they find your truth. You are, in a round about way, saying that only an illogical person would disagree.
There is the threat. If I don’t agree with you, my fate is sealed.
Thank you. I suppose a reciprocal compliment would be in order. I can’t commend you for tolerance or open mindedness; but I do thank you for not posting scripture. It serves no real purpose to me. We see what we want and I have found you can support any angle of an argument by searching the Bible for passages that support your stand.
When we reach the age where statements like this are in the past I will have no more fear of religion. This is the mentality that has bred the terrorists within all of the religions.
That is true, but some have felt Him and feel that is the evidence they needed.
Thank you, Viveksjat. Since moving to the Philippines from USA, I've been meaning to do more traveling. Perhaps some day I will travel to that beautiful land.
I kinda adhere to the Christian values of life. However, I draw on elements from Buddhism for experiential aspects. I think there is an element of truth in all thoughts/beliefs. Just have to know which one is the most correct.
Yes I most certainly believe there is a God out there in the outer realms of the universe.
His presence manifests Himself in all that I see around me - in the natural beauty of the earth, the people that I see daily and just life.
However, we all believe what we believe through the influences of those we know and if a person is a non believer, that is a choice which is just as valid.
Does that mean beleebin nonsense is as good as being rational an ur god int burning non beleebers fer not beleebin?
Hi Evolution Guy, my God is a Christian God and if you're referring to the 'nonsense' that rational beings see Christian doctrines as being, then the good, moral doctrines Jesus teaches, form a part of this 'nonsense', non believers see Christians as believing.
Each to their own and it takes faith and a deep understanding of the existence of God to see that Christian doctrines make sense.
This is why ur religion causes so many wars. Deep understanding of garbage? Zat so innit?
That's ironic, I couldn't find a religion that fit my own thoughts and points of view, troubled as they are.
I also do not believe the God which is mentioned and introduced by the world's different religions.
It seems to me that the prophets personally have seen the God and also got massages to deliver to his believer. But ,why prophets did not say, how he looks like ?
I asked my self. Why God gave different books to different prophets to create dispute among the believers.
The most interesting thing is that the prophets of all existing religions have different God in different name.
Every religions have his own philosophy and they are not ready to accept to each other. Spreading hate and war against each other.
Do you think, the God can do such a evil things ? I am not ready to believe such a God.
I believe a super power which is invisible. Our eyes can not see him but
you can see his reflection on his creation.human being , animals, creatures,
birds, sharks, delfins and other varieties of fishes under the water. How beautiful these are.
Look a babies. How babies develop in the womb of women, animals and in eggs . Millions of human being in this world but every single face is different from other. How great Architect will be the creator or say Master.
We can see his reflection or mechanism in his each and every creation.
Religions stories regarding God is like the story of " Alibaba and forty thieves "
My believe is on a super power and it is invisible . He do not need any thing from us. Our brain has not such a capacity to understand and to sketch his physical structure. Only to say , thank you my master is enough for our own consulation.
I'm not sure what our brain's capacity has yet to show us, especially i=when one considers those with amazing mental powers such as the many savants currently being seen by all of us on documentaries. Our capacity may be huge.
One capacity it is known to have is fear of death, thus religiosity is a part of the brain as well, although un-scientifically it could be called the ancient or lizard brain, still intact at the top of the spinal cord. We could even watch "god" doing his stuff with an MR, trying to douse the fear with whatever is at hand no matter how far-out-eum it is, even to the extent of believing a bunch of goat herders who were talking to people even more ignorant about the self than they were.
Religion is fluff, it blows away at the breeze of truth or the moment any light is shone on it
I'm not sure what our brain's capacity has yet to show us.
====
Me we do not know nuttin about our mental capasity.
If we could all role up the powers of our mental capasities up into one little ball. I think that this would be equal to those that are poswssed by God.
A double minded person never gets what they are wanting cause they haven't decided yet what they wnt.
Whenever (if it ever does) the whole population focuses upon one thing; it will de done. cause as you say we eash have the power to say what is reality.
Sooooo lets come to one mind and let it be so!
The human mind is a powerful thing. divided we fall.
GOD IS A CUTE REPLACEMENT FOR IGNORANCE //NO KNOWLEDGE /NO FACT....I DONT HAVE THE INFO HENCE ,,,ITS ALL GOD
THERE HAS 2 BE SOMETHING SAID FOR THE FACT THAT THE WORLDS MOST PROFOUND THINKERS OR OUR REALLY PROFOUND///BRIGHT FRIENDSOR MINDS R ATHEIST /AGNOSTIC/HUMANIST
THE UNINFORMED SUBSCRIBE TO ALL THEISMS 2FILL THE VACUUM OF NOINFO
there is no cure for ignorance.
We were all born with it and we will all carry it to our graves.
True dat! Not a bad idea spending one's life learning and knowing as much as we can though.
King Soloman is said to have been a smart man.
All is vanity!
Agreed. If I continue to learn at the end of it all I know that I will know nothing..... still, but that nothing is a lot to fit in a lifetime.
WHEN UVE OT GOTTEN AROUND TO SOURCING FACT / INFO THEN THE FACILE FILLIN IS ..MR GOD APPARENTLY
I don't think the almighty is anywhere in the domain of the religion. He is free and far more deep to understand then the religion. Every Human somewhere in his lifetime journey realizes that there is a power that is controlling everything there is something beyond perception that punishes for his/her mistakes. God can be felt in every realm of life from Science to History. From religion to Medicines. From the Quanta to the Cosmos.
Smart is good, depending on the definition of smart. That could be a religion in its own right.
Religion is about connections to God or spiritual growth (which is basically the same thing for those religions not explicitly discussing God).
Smart can be good so long as you don't blind yourself with your smarts. If you think you know something before you actually do, then you blind yourself. That's why scientists use restraint in their research (not all the time, but when they make progress, they do).
But "smart" will never be a religion no matter which current definition you take of the word. You could make up a new definition, but instead wouldn't it be better to make up a new word with the unique new definition?
KNOWLEDGE VACUUM IS THE TRAMPOLINE FOR GODDISM
I'm agnostic, which basically means I claim that there is no way of knowing. I believe in some sort of higher power, though that may simply be consciousness itself.
Do we go somewhere after we die? Sure, because nothingness does not exist. Do our personalities stay intact? That, I don't know.
Holy bulldust!
Have we got another bandwidth abuser here or what?
If anyone reads that much religious crud on a forum I'm gonna lengthen my hubs to half a million words!
Jeeze!
Talk about flogging religion on a forum, this one thinks he has the same coverage as the six o'clock news!
Worst of all Earnest, the presentation is like a brick wall of text, so there is no way anyone could possibly read what he says, even if they wanted to.
I think context is not a word they are familiar with!
You may recall we have a relatively new christiam contributor here who does the same thing.
The reception from her peers was less than enthusiastic as I recall.
I was also brought up a catholic, baptized and confirmed, went to catholic schools from kindergarten to university. I'm no longer a devout catholic and no longer believe in organized religion. I don't go to church regularly, but I still do once in a while, and I still consider myself a catholic. I believe in God, and will always believe in God. Everyday when I wake up, I thank God for giving me another day to live. And before I go to sleep, I thank God for a wonderful day, even if it was not so wonderful.
CAN I BE FACETIOUS....
WHEN I WAKE I THANKMY GRANDPARENTS,, FOR THEIR NON CANCER GENES,,,AND MY DAD FOR INCULCATING A HEALTHY LIFESTYLE IN HIS OFFSPRING.....LOTS OF VEG FRUIT WATER FISH CHICKEN...NO DRUGS..NO ALCOHOL;;CHOICE
B4 I SLEEP I PLAN MY TO DO FORNEXT WORKING DAY.
My GF and I broke up because of religious differences....
She thought she was God and I disagreed.
I would consider myself an atheist, because there seems little room in our understanding of how the universe works for God to exist. Evolution is fact, and we now have a working model of how the universe developed right back to the time of the Big Bang. God is no longer needed as an explanation. Also, there has never been any evidence of the existence of God, only belief, which is just not good enough for someone who needs proof. The history of religions is also understood and it can be seen that they are all manmade, with nothing supernatural as their cause. So I am left with no other option but to conclude that gods are only ideas within the human mind. This allows for no ultimate purpose to life. And the fact that the mind is a product of the body would not allow for an afterlife, because the death of the brain will mean the end of the mind it creates. I find this realisation very depressing, nevertheless, I think it would be vanity to deny the evidence in the hope that my fears could be overcome.
Well said.
When the body dies, that is the end of the god belief right there.
No oxygenated blood to the brain... no more god.
If you believe there is no after .... or beore ,,,
If you believe ... This is "IT" ... then we ain't all that and a bag of chips too. Ssooo ... tell me again why I should be listening to you?
No offense, just askinnn a real question.
I know living now may not seem much to some who can't wait for the next life, but to me it's a no brainer.
I love my life, but am not about to begin following a sad psychotic myth in the vain hope of a life after this one.
Not for me.
I will continue to enjoy my life for as long as it lasts. I know I will make worm food when I die, and that will contribute to the life cycle.
While I'm here I will contribute what I can in the way of love to enhance what is here for the next generation.
Those lucky worms! I plan to feed a few myself, Earnest!
Life is wonderful enough without bringing imaginary villains and deities into the picture.
I know living for today may seem like everything to some people who cannot accept that this life is just a training ground, that we are eternal beings, a spirit and soul with a body, not just a body with a soul (and for most unenlightened spirit)but for me it is a no brainer.
I love my life, but I'm not deceived by the enemy into thinking that this is it!
That just a short time living is what I was created for!
I will continue to enjoy life for as long as God sets me to be here in His power, like Earnest I will make worm food, for my body is nothing, and like him I will return to the very dust it came from, the chemicals and minerals God put me together with.
While I am here I will continue to reach out to the lost and try to bring them to a fullness of Christ, as God tells me I am to do, but I will also respect those who do not wish to accept Christ as their master, and choose to surrender their authority to other gods or demons.
Some of them are wonderful and beautiful people, it is not my part to judge or determine their future existence in eternity.
My sole responsibility is to be answerable to God for my own life, and to seek to warn those who God places in my life-path, of the dangers they may face.
Different perspectives on life are what makes it interesting, and we get to choose which one we prefer to follow.
Life's great, but death is nothing to fear!
Nicely said, John.
Bodies are wonderful, but temporary vehicles. I remember a few of them.
I should start calling you Lazarus Long then!
I've read a lot of Heinlein, but never any of the Lazarus Long stories. Only a brief mention of him in "Number of the Beast." Next chance I get, I check him out.
INTEREST ING PHRASE...SOME PEOPLE WHO CAN NOT ACCEPT.
..
RELIGIOUS FANATICS COME TO MIND.
.WHY SHLD ATHINKING INTELLIGENT PERSON FEELHIS/HER BELIE FIS THE ONLY ONE.....WE SEETHE WORST CASE OF WHERE THAT LEADS....IN THESE TIMES...MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY..SO INVASIONS/FATWAHS/BARBARIC EXECUTIONS UNDER THE GUISE OFRELIGION
HAVENT WE LEARNT AS YET
Yes back to dust we shall return,
BUT, the soul/spirit doesn't die..
Earnest what if when you die and find out you were wrong?
Lose/Lose
See ,the way I figure it ,if I die and find out I was wrong ,then nothing lost ,But, if God was right ,oh baby baby Im in Heaven!
Win/win
YUP/..AS SIMPLE AS THAT...SAD THAT SOME R SO CAUGHT UP IN THEIR RELIGIOUS MANTRA THAT THEY DONT GET ANY THING ELSE...PITY..WHY GET HOOKED UP ON WHAT SKY CITY TOURS THEYD EXPERIENCE WHILS FOLKS AS YR GOOD SELF PRAGMATICALLY GET THE REAL AND IMPORTANT PICTURE...NO OFFENSE MEANT 2 MY BORN AGAIN TAXIDRIVERS ET A;
Not meant to offend, however, I'm sure a few might be.
Do you believe in God? Which one? There are plenty of them, last I checked.
However, I no longer have a formed belief on the topic. I did once.
As for my beliefs? I only have one I care to share with the general public(outside family and friends). I believe the Boston Redsox will WIN the World Series this year.
I don't believe in any God, but I still respect people who do. My family still makes me go to church with them but... making me stand in a garage will not turn me into a car.
Thanks for sharing
Smart, that is outrageously funny: standing in a garage to become a car! Good laugh, that.
Driving in a car does not make you one, either. But occasionally, especially when driving for many long hours, I find that, even after leaving the car, I still feel the seat and steering wheel, and when I close my eyes that night, I see the constant flicker of the dashed yellow line down the center of the road.
Such attachment comes from well-practiced familiarity and association.
Most people think they are their bodies. And when some experience being outside of their physical shell, they become disoriented or confused. I wouldn't doubt that many who experience an out-of-body (OBE) event merely do not mention it to others because they themselves view the experience as crazy or unreal. It may go against their cherished worldview.
When a surgery patient can later list for the doctors the dusty items on top of the shelves nearby, this is not from hallucination or "lucky guess." This acts as real proof of our spiritual nature.
The most startling OBE I've experienced was crystal clear in visual clarity -- color, textures, details. It lasted only a few moments. And mine was not induced by drugs, surgery and/or trauma. My body had been wide awake, in a conversation with a spiritual counselor.
One of my brothers experienced an OBE while in a phone conversation with his girlfriend. She had just gotten out of the shower and was trying to decide which dress to wear. My brother attempted to help her out and she freaked a little when he described the contents of her closet. She freaked because she realized that my brother could also see that she wasn't wearing anything.
Just as we humans have children who look much like us, God had children who look much like Him -- non-physical, spiritual and immortal sources of creation.
I get to live on in a wonderful way after my death.
I created children.
If I taught mine right, I get to spend eternity WITH them!
Mine may all be rotten non-believers and will rot in hell like me.
Or maybe I will meet yours in eternity and we can discuss what a nice old bloke you were!
Bit strange, but nice anyway!
Not as punishment, Earnest, but as a matter of choice.
When a suicide perpetrator decides to step off the roof of a 20-story building, they meet "God's vengeance" at the velocity of impact. Their "splat" is the result of God's creation (the natural laws of physical reality) plus their own misguided decision. Hell is kinda like that.
You may not be able to remember such things, but the period between lives (what the Buddhists sometimes call "bardo" or "between time") is sometimes filled with great terror and disorientation. Being without your body can prove to be a real bitch.
One Hubber described developing the ability to have lucid dreams on a regular basis, but then the dreams got carried away. Fear crept in. And in that fear-based dream reality, fearful things were created. And he couldn't easily wake up. He might think he was awake, but the dream was still going on.
When you are without a body in the post-death bardo, there is no such thing as "waking up." No body. Nothing to wake up. Such near-perpetual terror could be likened to a lake of fire. Definitely not a comfortable position to be in.
What is truth? I don't know. Not yet. When I'm humble enough, I find pieces of it. Will I finally be able to awaken the sleeping immortal, within (the kingdom of heaven)? I don't know. I hope so. I strive to "follow Christ," but find myself too often chasing after ego. I still have a lot to learn.
Still misreading it, eh, Earnest? No worries.
Just an FYI on the down low: death AND Hell were tossed away at the resurrection. To back it up, Johns vision defines it also, just at the mention -- twice in the same sentence-- about the first resurrection.
Happy Tuesday aft`noon bud.
James.
Simply replying to a belief which has long standing with certain posters.
I don't believe in God in particular. I believe there may be some source of all power up there...somewhere, but I'm not religious to believe it is God. Who knows! But I do not judge those who do believe in God.
lone, there are literally dozens of sound reasons for all sorts of phenomena we experience in our minds, but that is it, no invisible impossible mythical entity required to explain phenomena, but the origins of it are the mind itself in many cases.
Some phenomena are difficult to explain, but one does not need to throw logic out the window and resort to myths in finding an answer to everything. We don't know everything, and I'm fine with that.
Yeah, but you are choosing to burn in hell by not believing the nonsense this one tells you. Especially as he makes it harder to read by using colored "ink." Is it just me - or are these guys sounding more and more desperate for people to believe them?
Earnest, that's great! There are plenty of possible reasons why I would see something clearly without my Homo sapiens eyes. I agree.
A friend of my Dad's, in 1971, told a story of spiritual research in the mid-50's. He was called to an office he had never visited before. While discussing things with the researcher, he was asked to describe the contents of the neighboring room (to which the door had been closed). He did so, and even read off the titles of the books on the filing cabinet next to the door leading to the room in which his body sat.
There are several possible explanations. It could've been a real OBE. He could've read the minds of the researcher and his assistant. He could've asked God. He could've consulted the Akashic Records (the Jungian super-consciousness). Did I leave any out?
The simplest would seem to be that he merely got outside of his body and took a look. Could my OBE have been merely a hallucination? Perhaps, but a non-drug, non-trauma, non-surgery hallucination with such clarity of color and detail is startling even to this scientist.
But my Dad's elder friend's experience is something else! To say that such a thing is caused by some physical process really would be throwing logic out the window.
And to have one lane in bumper-to-bumper rush hour traffic on a six-lane boulevard in Los Angeles suddenly empty for a distance of 2 miles, all in less than 5 seconds, is beyond anyone's ability to explain by ordinary physical processes. Especially when such clearance started less than a second after your primary witness created a picture of such clearance and then dismissed (or as the Buddhists would say, "allowed") that mental image into reality.
Okay, so I don't have video tape of this. There were over 2000 witnesses. Perhaps one day one or a few of them will come forward and corroborate it. If someone does come forward, I'll ask them the color and make of the car I was driving, if they can remember that detail. I'll keep that detail private until such time.
In the meantime, say you believe my story, or merely suspend disbelief to discuss the merits of the incident. How would you explain it? What physical processes would've been involved? If any!
In every city I've visited (from Madrid to Bangkok and D.C. to L.A.), an ambulance cannot clear rush hour traffic for a 2-mile stretch -- ever! And the laws in the United States say that traffic needs to move to the right -- not right and left around the center, West-bound lane.
Thoughts?
Some phenomena are difficult to explain,
== -= =- -- ==
Me and cause we cain't splain it. It Ain't real ?? !!"?
Odd. You don't say you cannot explain it - you claim to have an explanation. Majik.
Amazing, E.G. Science has explanations for all manner of things. So, having an explanation for something is not the problem, I take it.
And your explanation? Will you merely claim ignorance, bury your head in the sand and hope you never run into anything like that for yourself? That really is funny!
Jerami and you would sure look funny with your butts sticking up in the air, and heads well-grounded. Funny but sad.
Yes - I claim ignorance instead of majik. You are lying when you say you have a majikal explanation. I am not burying me head in the sand. You are talking nonsense and I do not accept it. You have lied to yourself and are causing conflict by claiming that I am not accepting facts that are true when you are talking nonsense instead.
A one word answer does it for me.
Synchronisity.
Very hard to explain to the kids I know, but having experienced it myself on two occasions I understand your passion in defending your experience, I never ever mention mine for fear of being laughed off the forums..
By the way, both my experiences were after attending my psychotherapist and towards the end of my third year.
OK, I'm open and interested Earnest, really, you see I reckon that you are such a good guy, I cannot fathom how I could be f\deprived of you for eternity!
I need answers!
No Bulls**t Earnest, I reckon we have spoken more these last few months than many people speak with their friends in a lifetime, I have seen you expose yourself (in a good way) and seen that you are open, considerate, honest and at times very annoying, just like the rest of us therefore!
How on earth could you be disqualified from eternity?
Makes no sense, yet I know we are eternal, so give me an answer!
Well I do not buy any of the biblical stuff as you know, and we have had the context and psychosis argument often enough in the past.
I have no problem with you believing you are here for all time.
The way I see it is that when my consciousness dies it is the end of this entity, and what is left behind will be a father and grandfather's love, and the moral example I have tried to set in my business life.
I like to think I make a difference and that matters into the future.
OK I can see your point, I know my father lives still for me, my grandfather I never knew, died one year one week and one day before I was born, everyone told me I was the reincarnation of him, and I feel I know him from the genealogy I have carried out. like wise my great grandfather, and I see my mother in my daughter, so yes the DNA and genetic links flow forward in time, and are living reminders of those who went before, but I still feel that we are eternal, to simply have one race around the track and then dissipate is futile, and I do not see life as futile, I see it as vibrant, and I do have an enlivened spirit, and have experienced 'the other side' as my physical life has interacted with their spiritual existence.
It (life) does not end, it may not do what any of us expect or have been taught or figured out for ourselves, but it does not end.
In soft mode I can believe we will be positioned according to our actions, to the love we have shown, to the help we have given to the selflessness of our lives, and I hope for that, as I know too many good people who do not qualify under the Christian doctrinal stance, yet surely deserve to gain a just reward for their lives.
Thankfully we will all find the truth in due time, and whether we are right or wrong, we will either be aware of or never know.
I carry my grandfather's name.
My grandfather on my fathers side died when Dad was 14, on my mothers side when I was 3.
I have great respect for both of them as their history shows they were both good men.
I agree with Aguasilver. I've seen your kindness and thoughtfulness at times in these forums.
I understand your fear of being laughed off the forums, but you have my interest and respect for your experiences, too.
Synchronicity? Is it synchronicity when a scientist has one coincidence after another proving his thesis? And some alignments outside of the laboratory are statistically improbable ... in the extreme!
The random motion of air molecules makes a four-minute vacuum, twelve inches across, a statistical impossibility. This would prove to be far more than mere synchronicity. Even a hundredth of an inch in diameter would be a shocking anomaly and completely outside the reasonable use of "synchronicity."
Earnest, you sometimes strike me as a reasonably intelligent guy. Did you ever take statistics in school or probability theory? I haven't, but I've read enough mathematics (plus straight "A's" in Advanced Algebra and Trigonometry, Geometry, etc). Where does synchronicity end and improbability begin? How many coincidences does it take to confound physical law?
Take Jesus walking on water, for instance. Was it synchronicity of water molecules happening to move in the upward direction underneath Jesus' feet with each step he took? But only underneath his feet and nowhere else on the Sea of Galilee? Occam's razor would slice the heck out of that ungainly monster of an explanation. I don't think Occam's tool applies to every situation, but here it sure make sense.
And how is it synchronicity for my father's elder friend who in an OBE could read off the titles of books not visible to his Homo sapiens eyeballs? Hmmm-m-m! He merely spouted off a string of words which happened to match those titles? Synchronicity? Puhl-eeeze!
And my brother Larry's OBE experience freaking his girlfriend when on the phone he helped her pick out a dress to wear, pointing out the black dress, third one to the left of the green one. She freaked because she realized he could see her closet and she had just gotten out of the shower (and was not wearing a towel).
Synchronicity? Earnest, I have a one word reply!
Nope!
I believe in an EGO-less myself. I believe in transforming my EGO to self-esteem... and thereby attaining deliverance and peace of mind. I'm almost there... where I'm immune to external shocks.
We are brought up to believe in God. As a child we are inculcated that there is Someone who is above all, and we mold our psyche accordingly. Later in life, we begin to challenge our childhood notions. Some become atheist and others become strong believer.
I don't actually believe what I was taught to believe. But I think somewhere there is supernatural power, which sometimes acts evil and sometimes it is good.
yes..THAT is true...some phenoma are very hard to explain...
WE HAVE NOT YET ACQUIRED THE SOLUTION RSO OFTEN EXPLAINED AWAY BY WHAT CLD SEEM ACOPOUT...ITS GOD.....ONE CLD TRY FACT /RESEARCH/STUDY ETC...GOD IS INSERTED OFTEN INTO FACT VACUUMS
There are two energies of the supreme lord: 1. Material & 2.Spiritual.
Anyone is serving one of the two energies, the choice is that we have a free will to choose any of these energies. Material energy (that can be touched) will get us pride, ego, lust, anger and frustration because one always wants to accumulate more and more. On the contrary spiritual energy makes us humble, blissful and gives us more knowledge to see and understand things as they are part and parcel of the lord.
INTELLECTUAL ENERGY IS ITS OWN GOOD APHRODISIAC..IE SATISFYING...HENCE MORE SO THAN OTHER ENERGIES IN THE MINDS OF SOMEPERSONS...NOT EVERYONE BUYS IN TO THE SANTACLAUS THEORY
I believe in the Source of all creation and all creation being of the Source
I don't believe in the God of the Bible, but I believe in that there is some sort of divine force above us. This is from researching and studying near death experiences.
I HAVE HAD THE OLD NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCE..BUT THERE IS NO LOGICAL CONNECTION AS A RESULT ,,TO BUYING INTO THE DIVINITY TRAIN...I AM NON THEIST...DRIVEN BY INTELLECTUAL PURSUIT
You are headed in the right direction Leaving the Catholics in the dust was the best thing you could ever do!!! Praise God for that, now pick up a bible and read the book of Matthew where Jesus speaks to his disciples, you are on your way!!
Also, john 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believes in him should NOT perish BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE!!
Belief in a myth equals salvation does it?
Salvation from what exactly? The shocking mess his dad left behind?
I believe in God, but not religion. I don't hold the bible to be the inspired word of God. I feel that there is no right or wrong religion. What truely matters is that you live by the mist important rule. The Golden Rule!
http://religiouslyconfused.webnode.com
Do unto others is psychologically unsound.
Who knows what anyone would find acceptable to have done to them based on what I wanted done to me?
The best way to relate to others is with simple transactional thinking, beginning with the premise "I'm OK your OK"
All religion runs on "You can be OK if"
Not loving, not honest and not true.
All religion is man made to control and manipulate others, and is one of the most disgusting and useless ways to view our fellow man...... through the eyes of psychosis.
You know, earnest, I don't know that I've ever looked at it quite this way. I agree with you to a point. Everyone is different, and so it would be quite natural for us to treat them differently. I think that's what you're saying, in part, am I right?
On that premise, I would say that it is reasonable to treat others the way they treat you within the bonds of common decency and respect. And, if for whatever reason, their treatment doesn't command decency and respect, your best bet is to simply distance yourself from them.
I find what you said very thought provoking.
Personally I would prefer people to be treated in the way they choose to be treated, not how I treat myself.
I feel confident that some of the things I do would be most unsuitable if projected on others.
That is a bit deep Earnest ! maybe you could give your bad back to the religionisers to give them some real issue to worry about themselves about
Now there is a great idea! I will generously allow them to take my back problem on.
I see exactly what you're saying. We generally tend to be much harder on ourselves than we would ever be on others. It would make sense for us to treat someone kindly where we might be harder in the way we treat ourselves.
So if I choose to be treated as exempt from all moral responsibility, to be treated as having the self given authority to do whatever I want, that would be OK with you, we would both be OK yeah?
I'm Ok, you're OK would still be a good starting point?
Hey Aqua, it might be you who is looking at the individual incorrectly. And, misunderstanding what Earnest is trying to say.
What Earnest is pointing out is "acceptance" of the others. Is the starting point.
Your entire post, was written as IF one cannot truly be one's own authority, so must answer to a higher authority?
People can be their own authority. No god required. And, still manage to do good with their life. Which proves, no god is required to understand one's own life and no need for a god to live it either.
Spot on Cags.
Acceptance is the starting point, the very thing that is missing in religion.
You can be OK IF, or you can be loved IF is not love or anything like love.
I saw my ex wife give this type of :love to her son which she did and he fought till he was 6 years old. A very brave little boy who had although quite rich, had been through hell.
I was living with his mother in Australia when I found out about him (She is a qualified child psychologist by the way) and it was ME that bought him to Australia when he was 6 as soon as I knew about his circumstances in Xian.
Because she is the natural mother, it cost me a total of $740,000 to remove him from his mother and 5 years of court battles before he was permitted to have his say and live with me alone without his mother. It also cost me a double fronted Victorian house that I owned near nothing on and now worth around 1.7 mill.
For all those years during the hearings in the family court I lived with her in my house just to protect him from the massive psychological abuse, and so I never left her alone with him after the first time she tried to physically hurt him.
While we were now both being abused, I never told him his mom was no good, I told him I did not agree with his mothers behaviour and that it was the result of her suffering. He still kept seeing his mother and does still today, at my request.
She was Chinese, not religious, but had the same "You can be loved if" approach to child raising as religion has to everyone.
Don't give me Bull*hit about that being love aqua, it makes me feel nauseous.
It is quite simply insanity
UR REALBRAVE 2 PUT ALL YOUR PERSONAL /PRIVATE/CONFIDENTIAL BUISNESS IN THE ETHER WORLD....NOT ME...NUNCA JAMAS..
.PS .....I DROPPEDB Y AUSSIE TOWN COUPLE YEARS AGO FROM MY CARIBBEAN LOCALE....LIKE A MONTREAL DOWN SOUTH I...SO GRACIOUS..SO CIVIL
...HAD 2 SLIP THAT GOOGLY IN..
.LIL OFF TOPIC ...SO MEA CULPA MEA CULPA MEA MAXIMA CULPA
Actually following transactional analysis processes is always a good starting point no matter who we are dealing with.
Do unto others is psychologically unsound IF your own wishes are perverse, if however they are righteous, then you would do no harm.
Do no harm is the mantra of witchcraft: "Do as you will, but do no harm"
Doctors are taught "First do no harm"
"I'm OK your OK" presupposes that whatever they are OK with is actually OK.
Dangerous ground, they may be OK with being a lying cheating deceiving sociopath who thinks it's OK to lure you home and slice you into small pieces, all the time giving you an 'I'm OK your OK loving smile'
So we humans need to actually decide some basic level of authority which dictates what IS OK and what IS NOT OK.
And that requires submission to SOME authority who can exercise that authority over YOU.
Who is that authority in your life... that is the question?
What offers you unchanging basic understanding on how to interact with humanity, no matter whether they are OK or not?
Which is why religion runs on "You can be OK if" because there needs to be SOME IF that we agree upon.
Aqua, if you learn TA you will see that I'm OK your OK is a two way street, without the opportunity to be sucked in by some snake oil salesman, as the awareness of self demanded to stay on track is built in to the process, from both parties, or it is obviously I'm OK you're not OK, at which point one refers to the transaction analysis itself to ensure conformity.
TA Philosophy
"People are OK; thus each person has validity, importance, equality of respect."
I can agree with that, provided that it is accepted that some folk are plain evil and incapable of change, being evil: that is being given over totally to evil: can be changed by personal decision.
In my experience the decision that changes it will be to submit authority to Christ and allow Him to deal with the evil powers that control the subject.
I have seen that work, had folk who told me afterwards that their 'inner voices' were telling them to kill me, but that they were constrained, so yes I can see that Christ in one can bring changes that stop ones evil intentions or desires.
But I have NEVER seen any human make that decision to leave behind their evil traits and STAY clean on their own power.
"Everyone (with only few exceptions, such as the severely brain-damaged) has the capacity to think."
Agree again, but I have found very few people who are prepared to think, because thinking leads to the realisation that you have been deceived by the world since you were first assessed in kindergarten, that you are living as a slave to the system, even though you may think you are a free man, and that to change that means RADICAL discomfort and even danger to yourself and your family.
Better to sit back and watch TV with a beer than think, thinking leads to danger....
"People decide their story and destiny, therefore these decisions can be changed."
See first part above. I chose my story from age eleven, was an accomplished thief by 13 years of age and controlled a gang of older (but mentally challenged) thugs who I could manipulate to do my will.
Yes we can decide our destiny, but (for me at least) the destiny I chose was the wrong one, for in the end result I found no satisfaction from the riches and power, and when I spent my years of self analysis, introspection and reality checks, found that my real desire was as a creative, and my satisfaction comes from setting people free from the shackles that the world imposes on them.
Best of luck with your TA, let me know when you have successfully allowed a killer who you have treated to stay in your house when you and your grandchildren are asleep.
Yes I have done that, and he told me that he was going to have killed me and left my child alive, but that, as said, he was constrained, and I slept soundly, knowing that He that is in me is greater than he that was in him.
TA is 27 years ago for me aqua, I have spent the time since studying other things.
TA makes a simple truth, and the character of people has nothing to do with it.
I spent 31 years behind the counter in my motorcycle and auto businesses spending many years serving all the world known bikie gangs from Hells Angels to Coffin Cheaters, Road Rebels and a dozen others.
Most of them were ladies and gentlemen.
I am not some babe in the woods ya know aqua!
As far as biblical things go I will simply state that anything in it which is psychotic was written by a psychotic, and that you can write in stone.
This is the problem with people like aquasilver who believe they have "higher authority" than anyone else. They assume there is only "my way or the highway." I have made some pretty drastic behavioral changes without the need to pretend I was doing it for an Invisible Super Being and therefore I have the right to tell you what to do and you need to do what I did.
This is why their religion causes so much conflict.
I feel sure many of us have done thing under our own steam that would appear to be too much for others to take on.
Being an Aussie I know some of our immigrants have been almost super human in their endeavours to provide a good family life, even leaping in a leaky boat to have a chance at a decent life.
No god required.
DIE HARD FANATICS TO ANY CAUSE...BE IT RELIGION ETC...HAVE SOME DIFFICULTY BEING INCLUSIVE OF OTHER /ALL VIEWS....WHICH HAS 2 B THE BEST AD WHY NOT 2 PARTAKE OF RELIGIOUS FARE
MY CLUB IS THE ONLYONE 2 B FOLLOWED....YR CHOICES R OF NOIMPORT UNLESSTHEY R THE SAME ASMINE.....SOUNDS KINDA DANGEROUS /LIMITING /
Hence the Inquisition, Crusades, Witch trials etc etc. Now you spouting nonsense about having an authority I need to bow down to and I am rebelling if I do not attack homosexuals as sinners.
This is why your religion causes so many conflicts, aguasilver - you and people like you who take no personal responsibility because they have no authority. You are the problem. You.
Be a man. Take personal responsibility.
Mark, we have covered this ground before, yet you still come up with the same trite little arguments, go try them on somebody who does not know your multiple personality's all using the same saw to play your merry tunes.
Like you a lot mate, but it does get boring, no matter which sock you are wearing.
There is nothing trite about honesty. Take personal responsibility for your actions.
Please stop lying about me. I am only using one persona. I know your "morals" allow you to lie, as long as you repent in your head but still......
I made a reasonable argument to try and explain why people such as yourself always feel the need to impose their "higher authority" on everyone else. Just look at you threatening everyone with punishment and damnation if they make the "wrong" decision not to believe the garbage you believe.
Why not address that point instead of lying about me?
Jesus did not attack homosexuals as sinners. He dined with sinners, talking to them with compassion. Anyone who claims to be Christian should do the same thing. It was only the so-called "law abiders" (the Pharisees) who condemned Jesus for loving the lowly sinners who needed his help.
Again, E.G., no matter how many times you blame religion for war, you're hitting the wrong target. Not very bright.
That's one problem with ego. Wrong target! Wrong everything. Even when ego is supposedly right, it is wrong. If you look only at the spectrum of a dichotomy, you won't find truth. You need to go outside of that spectrum to see how truly wrong ego is.
Pseudo-Christians attacking sinners who more need their compassion, that's wrong action. That's ego speaking.
With your illogical statements about religion, you are no poster child for logic. Because war and cruelty also exist outside of religion, there may just be a deeper reason for those ills.
You say "take responsibility." Good words, but can you live up to them? Can you take responsibility for your own ego? With your haranguing about religion and ignorance of the real cause -- ego -- I'm having my doubts.
There are many "higher authorities" in life. Some are temporary. Some are permanent. There are dictators, policemen, governors, presidents and the like. But there is also physical law -- like gravity. If you have no respect for law, you might step off a tall building and discover that you indeed go splat. So much for ignoring the higher authority of gravity.
And beyond gravity is an even higher authority.
How can such authority be only about love, but with so much violence and suffering in the world? That is a conundrum which can be answered, but only if you let go of ego long enough to look. And the answer is quite logical. In fact, very simple. It takes the creativity of Einstein and the intelligence of a child to discover it.
You are correct. Religious people such as yourself are the problem. There is no higher authority. Take responsibility for yourself instead of this egotistical nonsense you keep spouting. Listen to what I am saying instead of defending your religious beliefs and saying nonsense as fact. You have no authority. None. The conundrum is why religious believers such as yourself blind themselves to reality and cause so many conflicts. And then claim they are not doing so. Disgusting.
RELIGION SERVES THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CONTROL....THE MIND/INTELLECT OR THE LARGESSE....IN AFRICA MISSIONARY TYPES WLDSAY PRESUMABLY TAKE THIS BIBLE AND GIVE ME YR WEALTH /LANDS...
WHERE INFO IS LACKING OR LOGIC FAILS MR GOD IS PUT FORWARD 2FILL THAT VACUUM ..I DONT HAVE AN ANSWER HENCE ITS GOD WHO DID OR DIDNT DO IT...I NEBER FAIL2 BE AMAZED AT HOW OTHERWISE INTELLIGENT ASSOCIATES SUCCUMB TO THE BEST SNAKEOIL MANTRA 2 HIT PERPETUITY.
IN THE CARIBBEAN IF U WANT 2 START WORLD WAR 3,,JUST ESPOUSE NONTHEISM...A TAXI DRIVER BELTEDMEOUTOF HIS CAB
WHEN I ASKED HIM 2 SAVEME THE BORNAGAIN RHETORICWHICH I CERTAINLY NEVER REQUESTED
THERE HAS 2 B SOMETHING SAID FORTHEUNUSUAL COINCIDENCE OF THE WORLDS TRU PROFOUND THINKERS /INTELLECTSALL SUBSCRIBE 2 NON THEISM..
THEY SEEMM2KNOWSOMETHING THE BORNAGAINS HAVNT BOUNCED UP AS YET
Do we have a choice. Our government, our parents, our teachers, our friends...everyone tell us to become a believer.
Yeah, probably, but my post probably brought a fatwah down on me, so who cares!
I believe in Siddhārtha Gautama ( the awakened one )
"Buddhists recognize him as an awakened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end their suffering by understanding the true nature of phenomena, thereby escaping the cycle of dukkha and rebirth (saṃsāra), that is, achieving Nirvana. Among the methods various schools of Buddhism apply towards this goal are: ethical conduct and altruistic behaviour, devotional practices, ceremonies and the invocation of bodhisattvas, renunciation of worldly matters, cultivating continuous mindfulness, meditation, physical exercises, study, and the cultivation of wisdom." ~ Wiki
If you are not familiar with the practices or teachings of Buddha,look it up on Wikipedia. I found my values are closely aligned with that of Budism. Several years ago I finally decided to choose my religion. ^_^
I would like to know more about synchronisity in the deeper Jungian sense myself.
I have the empirical evidence of my own experience which I would not try to pass of as truth, as I could not produce the evidence, and if I did it would still not be proper proof and could be torn apart as easily as your experiences can.
I also have the empirical evidence gathered by Jung during his experiences with inmates of a mental institution he was assigned to at one time and little else other than an account of poltergeists that could be seen as related.
I believe in magic of a young girls heart and the music that'll free you whenever it starts.......................
Ahhhh.... The Lovin Spoonful.... fond memories
Thanks for pointing that out John. I hadn't noticed this when I started following him. I wont accept it from those i disagree with and it's just a tad hypocritical to do so from those ido agree with. If a person refuses to put their words out where they can at least be attributed to a hub page, I have no interest in following them. I have quit following him and again thanks.
I should say, my pleasure, but of course it is not, I would rather folk stood up and be counted, and if that cost them followers or income, so be it.
Thanks for replying.
John
I believe in a God that is beyond religion. I believe that god is beyond human comprehension. We can't comprehend him/her with our limited time and space.
Yet you comprehend this god and know it is there? How strange. You just said you do not understand.
In any case - what makes you think every one is as dull witted as yourself? You know what I can and cannot comprehend? Sounds to me like yet another excuse to claim knowledge without doing any learning.
I believe Buddhism .I think load Buddha show the path for nirvana
I never even knew he was their manager, was that before Kurt shot himself?
I didn't realise he was talking about the manager...... I was going to ask him to sing a few bars to see if I knew the song.
OK it seems neither of us believe Buddha is running the shop.
But harmless and a very nice religion to follow, if you don't want too many rules..... never met a violent Buddhist myself, but I guess they exist out there.
I have plenty of Buddhist friends, it's more or less Christianity without Christ but with Feng Shui added.
Ok, but has some really strange home decor rules!
I believe in the Creator God; and it is very natural to believe in Him.
NATURAL IS A HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE CONSTRUCT..
..EG IT MIGHT B NATURAL 4 ME TO BE INTELLECTUALLY DRIVEN AND NOT PUSH MR GOD TO FILL ANY INFO VACUUMS I ENCOUNTER
I do so believe in God....I know with out Him I wouldn't have made it this far.
I do believe in the ONE Creator God who set the evolution wheel of the Universe in motion; I worship Him and pray to Him.There is none like Him.
Sure ,just goggle 'atheist forums' and tons pop up.
Sheltered life -yea right
Im pretty much the same way ,somebody says something I have to add my 2cents worth, but only if its something that I feel quite strongly about.
I do try and be courteous, and sing that song
Oh lord ,please dont let me be misunderstood
If Google advertised here , we'd make a mint eh
I probably won't look, as I have no interest in the subject at all. To me it is a construct, and those who want to make a belief of it are welcome to, but it would bore the pants off me.
I am courteous unless something is projected that includes me that I disagree with, then I usually reply in kind.
Love the song!
You are right, we could retire to some wonderful place like New Zealand, or Australia!
I hear that
Hey just finished watching a Doco on Aussie, the 12 Deadliest animals,think Ive seen it before ,but its always good to see geography close to home -though I wouldnt want to swim it
Next prog, on is New Zealand and Australian Border Control.
Gosh what a crack up the things people try to bring downunder and the lengths they go to concealing dodgy stuff.
I mean do they think we are that thick!!
I just love hearing the accents( never thought Id say that)! and the calm manner they all use. Its a different demeanour
I haven't seen it yet. I will check it out.
Back to the original question...No...I believe in people. I believe people once needed some type of direction and need for a "God" to dispose the fear they had of the unknown: Death, Night, the Heavens, Storms, Disease, etc. We being intelligent beasts need order to survive. Religion maintains this order for serveral centuries. Unfortunately, as mankind grew more intellectual God needed to evolve with him/her. The old testament god is vengeful, and demands reverence. The new testament god is about love and peace.
The new branded god had more appeal to the intellectuals that still had no real answers for the unknown. Religions now are evolving at even a faster pace because the demands of society and equality are usurping both testaments. We should all put down our bibles and work together for the better of mankind. It is your brother, neighbor, countrymen, terrans alike that can make this world a better place. Only we can reduce poverty, fight disease, stop famines, etc. Religion is a deterent to world peace. And we all want world peace right?
I believe there is a God, but I'm not religious - I don't pray. I guess it's mostly because I've seen many "religious" people do bad things, which sickens me to the stomach sometimes. Hence, my philosophy in life is just be nice to everyone and to help others whenever I can.
I believe in the Creator God who has no partners, no wife, no sons and daughters.
I wish the USA would get the hell out of Iraq, they have destroyed it already.
Let the two religious factions do what they have done since the beginning of time, interpret their hate filled tome differently then kill each other over it.
Obama will pull them all out as soon as he can get it past the vested interests of congressmen who have lived off the war.
Never really got why they invested so much time and money, my god it turned into such an expensive war!!!!
Pride? Hmm..
USA Military would be better bordering their own nations lines ie
Mexico/USA
Drug Cartel /Illegal Immigratation
Priorities ?
I can't give you a good reason for the Iraqi war, but I can tell you why the US military can't police our borders. That is barred by federal law banning the military from being used on U.S. soil for domestic law enforcement.
US military action within our borders would be a can of worms we do not want to see opened.
Think I know where you might be coming from ,but whats the difference I wonder.
The war is right on our/their doorstep!, yet they step over that and fly to another country..
I'm afraid I don't see a border war. I see foolish government policies. Our neighbors are not our enemies. Criminals on both sides of the border are the problem.
I suppose for a definitive answer on Iraq we'd need to see if Halliburton and Dick Cheney had a moment. It started as their war.
heres their good reason 4 that war.... o.i.l. o.i.l. and omore o.i.l.
Crikey! You don't know about all the black stuff under the ground called "oil"? The Iraq war is about controlling the Iraqi oil deposits.
Standing armies are more dangerous than central banks or oil companies.
they went to oil,,,they didnt go to war...
the wish2 right the worlds wrong s cld begin in south usa..ie fix yr own moat b4 yr neighbours sliver
WAR IS SIMPLY A BETTER INVESTMENT RETURN THAN WALMART ETC...ASK DICKCHENEY
i believe in the fat lady next door who shouts at our neighbors everyday. she's all knowing and nearly omnipotent
I believe in the Creator God who is created everything else; but none has created Him; He is on His own and needs nobody else.
No, you believe in some ancient books compiled by authors totally unknown to you.
Is that how you defend your point of view, by telling other's what they believe in? I've seen that all to often.
I believe what has been revealed by the Creator God with reasons and arguments that satisfy me and convince me; others cannot decide my faith for me, it is my faith and I am entitled to believe in it.
Oh! you can have faith in anything you choose, there is no contention there. But when you make public, your beliefs, you will have to justify.
From your words I suspect you have not seen the creator nor the act of creation. All you have is words written by people unknown to you, saying that, its from the creator. You just chose to believe them, for your own reasons, what ever that be. And if you USE reason, creator is irrational.
Note to ibneahmad, I'm not sure if you were aware...my comment was directed at jomine. Check "in relpy to this"
I have seen the act of creation; we all experience it. The system of life has been set by the Creator God and with those systems one is born and one dies.
I do experience the act of creation daily around me.
No - what you see and experience is "existence," and you just choose to believe it was created by majik.
Wow! There is one person who has seen the earth and the world being created.
what was god using then- a wand?
And did you see it or experience it?
And did you also, by chance, saw god creating the system(though i didn't understand what you meant by system)?
And how does this god look like?
Every day is a different day; if He did not sustain it under a system; it will be a doomsday; everything will get destroyed. He created it from the beginning; evolved life and sustains it.
Is this just rambling or are you trying to say something?
Ok. I'll put the questions.
1. What do you mean by creation?
2. You repeatedly say Beginning. Beginning of what?
3.Did you personally witness any creation?
No, I don't think it is by magic; the system has evolved as set by the Divine, the Creator God.
Even though there seems to be a huge debate, I think to each their own. I believe in Christianity but also have been studying other things as well such as Dawkins and Darwin. Elements of Evolution can be found but I find certain elements of Christianity actually seem to help me personally understand how some things got started in this universe. I try to take the stance that when an atheist tells me that they don't want to believe, I usually leave them alone about it.
Have you read anything by Lawrence Krauss?
I probably should. I guess I can start on his works after I finish I Ching and some other works.
There are a series of videos of peer reviewed lectures and talks on the BBC radio Discovery show.
Here is one link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo
thanks! got it saved as a favorites. Will have to definitely watch it and get back to you about it!
He does have a sort of interesting proposal of information. I felt like some of what he said was good and legit, like covering some of the basics of science. Other things I might have to research more in the future.
I have followed his work since he did the original circuit as he has been awarded for his capacity to explain many scientific theories to the public.
I find a lot of what he has to say stands up to scrutiny pretty well.
I thing there is about 10 hours in the series but I could be wrong.
He covers the big bang rather well, and his one about man being stuff of the stars is very informative.
I like science, and follow a lot of other peoples ideas too.
The latest spate of scientific docos on TV are sensationally well researched in the main and well funded.
Having said that, some are so poor as to be meaningless.
I appreciate you coming back here to comment as you said you would.
Of course. I try to remain that Christian that is open towards learning new ideas and people. I like that he did a fair job on being able to explain things well. I think that makes it good and has helped to understand my own Christian faith better. Thanks for sharing with me!
You are very welcome.
There is also a debate between Stephen Fry and other non believers and several religionists that also brings up Fry's homosexuality
It is well worth viewing. I don't know where it is though!
I would love to have a proper conversation with a believer who has heard both sides of the story.
I have done my religious homework, and feel it would be nice if someone of a religious persuasion did at least a small amount of research in to current scientific theories, the rudiments of scientific method and why science requires a theory to be refutable.
What I can do for you is this: I can spend some time studying both Science and my own faith and perhaps we can do an IM (Instant-Message) discussing some of these points.
Sorry I don't use IM, I run all my forum discussions here.
I'm just happy you are prepared to have a look.
Of course. If nothing else, it always me to grow in different ways as well.
That is warming to here. I intend to continue learning as much as I can every day.
Today I learned a heap of things! I now know which model of car to buy my son, all it's design faults and how to overcome them. I also met a very nice gentleman who lent me his beautiful Saab for the day so I could find out more about the cars performance and road manners.
I only spoke to him for the first time two days ago. I have formed a new business alliance and my daughter found us a 6 bedroom house inside the school zone.
Life is good! I did a heap of other things today as well, but have only been out of hospital a few days {where I learned a lot as well.)
The hardest learning though is about self, and that involves the most painful thing of all, an assault on the inner self.
A horrid journey to the inside darker self. The shadow as Jung referred to it.
People's minds will believe any myth, follow any path, learn any new discipline to avoid this journey in to self.
When we don't grow up and become "ourselves," we have a mid-life crisis, and we are then forced to go there by our own minds.
Some men leave their wives of 20 years and run off with a pretty girl, some buy exotic cars and houses, some wind up institutionalised for life.
Know that all the evil in the world is in me, it is the I that is the mass murderer and psychopath. The man at the gallows is me, not something I project on to a system of belief or another individual. I am the mass murdering rapist terrorist.
It is within my capacity to see this, and if I do see this, I am at last one of the humans that pose no threat to anyone, not even self.
Simply put, if I know the shadow, I am at no risk or low risk of acting from it.
The most fearful of men are those without self knowledge who project the shadow onto others and assign it to them.
I wish you well.
It is the Creator God who created everything from annihilation; none else could do it.
Maybe the god that made god was even better!
....or the god who made the god who made god.
Again? Do you understand what you write?
Annihilation of what?
Creation from annihilation that is what the Creator God does.
by surfgatinho 6 years ago
If I am a good person but do not believe in God what will happen to me?
by PhoenixV 6 years ago
Why Don't Atheists Believe In God?
by FootballNut 6 years ago
No matter what way you look at it.If God created life, then Satan the devil was born through God's creation, this makes GOD responsible for Satan's existence. So blame GOD for all things bad, instead of just shouting hallelujah and praising him or her for typical life results.If God did create...
by James Q smith 15 years ago
Just a question, but it would seem if there really were no God, then Atheists couldn't exist. Is Atheism a religion? They definitely seem to be unified by a common belief.
by boberto 15 years ago
Is there really a God out there?? If so where is he when we need him so much!!
by nightwork4 12 years ago
As an athiest, why do you think that religious people believe in god?to me it is about fear. fear of dying and knowing it's over, fear of being responsible for your wrongs without having satan to blame for an influence. basically fear. why do you think they believe?
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |