That was so wrong. I'll have you know I've been monogamous for 21 years.
In the Mormon sense?
Ooops, wrong thread
No. I don't share. Were it reversed and the women got the multiple husbands, I might be interested.
Yes, I know that's a double standard, a little hypocritical, and i don't care.
okay the reason why i hesitate going into any type of religeous topic at all, is because i know that if i disagree with someone, itll either be that im going to hell, or that i have no faith, or whatever. Personally, i believe that there is no concrete way for me to know what is real. There are way to many faiths, points of view, gods, just way too many. I feel it would be ego centric of me to say "this is what the truth is, everyone else is wrong" But i know because i say that i will get slammed with "you have to have faith" Well the thing is, i dont understand that because most of the people brought up believing in one thing or another, were taught that belief by there parents. They were unconciously conditioned to believe in what they do. not becaue of any ill intention, but because there parents believe so strongly in whatever it is. My mother never told me her faith. She didnt want to influence me, she wanted me to make up my own mind. We were sent to christian school, catholic school, (which i have to say catholic school taought you about other religeons) I find it horrible when people of other faiths, maybe taboo faiths are considered damned. Anyway, i dont speak to someone who has a strong opinion because we are designed to defend what we believe is true, so i know right away there will be a debate. Besides, isnt faith a personal thing? Didnt god say to pray in your closet? I think we can all do with keeping our faith to ourselves around mixed company.
I respect and agree with your perspective on religious faith. I also agree it is a personal thing. Wouldn't care if they shouted it from the top of every building if they would just stop trying to run the country (USA). Additionally, I believe it leads far too often to fear and hate, which affect our societies in many ways.
I think it's a good thing that we now can openly discuss it, and help to change the conversation. I would say that there is a nice mix of people here. Plenty of agnostics, atheists, christians, mormons, people who make up their own entirely new gods, etc etc. So that honestly anyone who wanted to participate might get slammed a little, but someone will always have their back.
But of course, for alot of people there's no interest, and that's fine too. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
Yeah, as if the believers can all agree on their individual faiths!
LOL I was thinking how to put it better - you did a perfect job
Hey Misha! Glad to see you back in the forums. Lately, whenever someones absent for a few days all sorts of gossip abounds!
I wonder if all scientists agree on everything scientific. I also wonder if all atheists agree on everything.
I doubt it Sir Dent. But scientists tend to prove a false theory wrong eventually, unlike believers, who defend their faith no matter how illogical.
So tell me why you think sceintists can come to agree with one another when you think believers can't.
You call belief illogical and I call it completely logical and I believe it makes more sense than anything. I can tell you off the bat that I am not a good debater. It doesn't mean I am wrong in my beliefs. It only means I would lose a debate if I got into one.
So how does one go about figuring out which is right and which is wrong?
First you have to decide if God gave us the ability to use reason and logic only to make our lives better and at the same time we have to disregard this same logic and reason in order to believe in him.
Unless of course, you think Satan is behind our logical reasoning and being able to study our world using science. Then science is bad and illogical reasoning is good. Is the world only a few thousand years old like many believers say or is our research and scientific endeavors the work of the Devil.
Are those with scientific minds predetermined to fail because God gave them logical minds? This counteracts any semblance of free will it seems.
Let me put it this way.
Science wants to know how everything works. They study whatever they want to according to their field of science.
Believers who actually know God, know how things work. it is all by the Word of God. When God created man, God gave him a mind. The mind of man is supposed to be towards God at all times. It is when man went to thinking of things other than God, that caused the "fall" of man.
God, being just and righteous, made a way for all to know Him. he put His own Word out there for all. It is the choice of each individual to use his mind as God designed it, or to use his mind as he wants.
What it boils down to is this. Those who really want to know God, will know Him. Those who do not, will not know Him.
Any adherent of any God can make this claim. You have no more power of persuasion than those of any other god. There have been many gods created by man and they all are alike. They demand you ignore your eyes and common sense in order to placate their own sense of self worth. Not my kind of god it seems.
thou shalt not kill, unless it's infidels
love one another, unless I tell you to slay them
use your talents wisely, unless they tell you I am wrong
Spot on Randy! The other thing that gods demand is worship. This one should explain to anyone who cares to think, that it is a pile of baloney!
A God so vain he creates his own worshipers! Pretty sad if you think about it. Why didn't he just get a dog?
Poor little insecure entity! I find this concept very funny.
But but but Randy demands that we all worship him!?
Yeah some of the ancient gods were really people, rulers, who claimed superpowers and demanded loyalty. They died, and their heirs, or were eventually overthrown, but their legacy lived on.
Do you see how easy it is to dismiss everybody else.
Those who don't believe in your religion simply must not want to know god, which is defined by your religion as the source of all goodness and love, neverminding all the people to whom your religion isn't even available.
Don't you see how that colors your perspective of others? And for what? So that believers can have a (forgive me Mr. Dent for saying this) make believe relationship with a make believe savior who excuses them from the natural responsibility of making the most of this world.
It is hard for me to accept that you believe you worship a god which you also believe will send my children to a pit of eternal punishment. You do understand my point of view there, don't you?
It has nothing to do with religion. God is God no matter what religion anyone believes. It is like the elephant in the room full of blind people. Many may call it something different than the others, but it still an elephant.
Call it make believe if you want. Makes no difference to me at all. Jesus did not die for the sins of the world so we can abuse the world. He died so that man can actually take responsibility for his own actions. It is called confession of your sins.
I know this will offend you but it must be said to make things clear. God doesn't want anyone to go to hell. He made a way for all to not go there. You speak as if Goid Hismelf is making you and your children go there, but it is your own self that puts you there.
It is like a life line thrown out into the sea to a person who fell overboard. That person has the choice to grab hold or let it go.
________________________________________________________________
So many want to blame God for their own faults and actions while others simply say that's just how it is. Still others want to blame Christians for the problems of the world when it is just simply mankind. All are guilty and none are righteous.
Well, okay. Clearly you aren't getting my point at all.
It's not about any "god". It's about peoples' belief in a "god" concept, generally through some religion or the other, which in fact damage society.
It has everything to do with religion because that is where the vast majority of people get their ideas of a "god" from, despite the fact that these religions are all based on nothing more than the superstitions and prejudices of societies that lived thousands of years ago.
Your perception of people is colored by these ancient superstitions and prejudices. You give lip service to the word love, yet are content to worship a nonexistant being who you believe sends half of your fellow humans to a hell.
As long as people find their comfort in and take their world view from these ancient superstitions and prejudices, allowing them to perceive others as rejectors of love and goodness, the world will never be at peace.
PB, with all due respect - flip it this way -
Do you see how easy it is to dismiss everybody else? Those who don't adhere to atheism must not want to think, and thinking like I do is the only way to goodness and love.Don't you see how that colors your perspective of others?
It comes off quite insulting that you think I have a "make believe" relationship with my God. You are guilty of what you accuse believers of doing. Can you see it? You do understyand my point of view there, don't you?
Holly
Well yes and no. I understand that it hurts to be perceived as not wanting to think. However, that really isn't my position, Holly.
I may sometimes give that impression when in debate, but I certainly hope not. It's extremely difficult and time consuming to post all the necessary disclaimers with each and every post, but I have stated my position there many times.
I was a christian. It took me years of active aggressive questioning to finally wade my way through it all. Had I not had the luxury of time to engage in that pursuit, I'm sure I never would have made it out. Well, I also had a background as an avid reader of both fiction and nonfiction which I also believe was helpful as it gave me a broader knowledge base and better critical thinking skills then your average joe, which is why literacy programs are among my favorite charities.
I don't think most believers don't want to think, or are dumb or anything else like that. I think generally speaking they don't have the times, the means, or the inclination to research any of it in a thorough and unbiased manner.
I think believers are just good people trying to do what is right. In our society that has always been defined as christianity. In other societies it's some other religion.
Their trying to do the right thing and live good. They turn naturally to what their society has always posited as being the way to do that. I don't blame people for that. I'm just trying to help break the chain of dependence on ancient ways of thinking.
PB,
My point was that you hold to your belief - atheism - in the same way you claim christians do particularly that they brush stoke all nonbelievers with the same shade of dismissal. Disclaimers aren't nessessary - the posts have the distinct flavor.
To state that some of us are hanging onto an ancient and in your opinion irrelevant fantasy religion because we lack the time, means or capacity to think it through as you feel you have - well that is just flat out arrogant. Why would you believe I or anyone else doesn't think it through and frequently in the course of living? Sounds like you think everyone should arrive at your conclusion to not be brush stroked into dismissal. Not being mean here - just saying it as I see it.
If you feel so convinced you must change others beliefs, what makes you different than the religion that goes door to door encouraging people to replace their beliefs?
There isn't any anger here - just not mincing words as I really want to know
WARNING: Novella length post ahead. Detour around is available to navigators not concerned with this neck of the woods.
It's not dismissal though. It's not 'oh well, you go to hell, such is life according to god, amen and hallelulah,' and the only thing atheists share is a lack of belief in a god. It's a very limited 'ism'.
Do my posts have that distinct flavor? That sucks. I'm trying to figure out how to be less offensive. It's something I want to work on. I remembered something, too, that adds to that desire. When I was 'caught in between', one thing that really turned me off was the crudity of some atheists.
I'm gonna keep doing what I do. That said I want to be as positively effective at it as possible. So I'm trying to think on that.
One thing I've concluded is that this battle isn't going to be won with the extremists, but with the moderates. If we can convince them then it all folds like a house of cards. And they're already half way there.
If we can help to bring them the rest of the way, or even almost the rest of the way, then I have to say that the cost of offending people is worth it, honestly. People are always offended by social progress, to some extent it's unavoidable. To some extent, but at too great an extent it can be counter-productive, plus I really don't like having to hurt peoples' feelings, so I'm still thinking on how to best pursue this course.
It's funny you ask this, because I was just reading this morning on an atheist blog I check in on about the very same subject. Atheists have differing viewpoints about what should be done, ranging from nothing to an all-out war of words. The blogger -friendly atheist- is in the middle like I am. Being either too passive or too aggressive isn't a good idea.
I'm thinking on it, Holli, and I appreciate your comments.
As to the rest of what you say, well, I cannot deny the facts. Sure some believers spend a good deal of time thinking on it, and many apologetics have been formulated to try and respond to the changes in modern thinking which point out the flaws in their religions.
Look, I'm trying to be nice, but at the same time, please let's not be naive about it. I know all the research I have done, and I have limited access. I know full well that most believers haven't done anywhere near even that limited amount of study on the subject. You want to pretend they have, well that's your choice, but I know it's not true. Most believers haven't even read the bible and don't even fully understand the tenets of their own churches, let alone ever looked at the origins of the bible and the development of the churches. Of the minority who have, or do, the majority of them only do so through materials offered to them by apologists.
It's not arrogant for me to think this, it's just realistic and factual. What's to be arrogant about anyway? People have lives to live, it's perfectly natural they haven't had the opportunities I had for it. Plus this is all still relatively new, and at the same time probably old as the hills if you want my honest opinion. People have always questioned the gods, the Bible itself testifies to this, but only in the last few decades have we been able to do so publicly without too much fear of too much retribution over it. We are finally changing the discussion, and alot of material that wasn't easily accessible by the masses before now for the first time in history is.
There's no reason any nonbeliever should be arrogant about it imho.
I'm not generally among those who voice a dislike, disapproval or disdain for those who go door to door. All men shall be free to profess -and by argument maintain- their opinions in matters of religion. (Thomas Jefferson)
I don't care if they come knocking on my door. I look at it as an opportunity. Ironically, in this case, opportunity always knocks more than once.
Holli you can ask me anything you want anytime and in (almost) any way. I don't get offended unless people purposely twist my words or insist on repeatedly making dumb remarks that offer nothing to the discussion but hate. I genuinely appreciate peoples' honest input, and that's what your's is.
And if I told you that I continually think and research and question, and have come to a radically different conclusions than you, would you respect that without questioning my intellect, education or intentions?
If I told you that I dug deep into my bones and began questioning the one thing that I really, really could examine, my own motivation, and that I began chasing atheism, because I knew in my guts that if I could prove God didn't exist I could do whatever the hell I wanted without consequence now or in the future?
If I told you that while I was actively and skeptically avoiding the question of God's existence, using my scientific education to justify my own self-centered life, that I literally heard a voice tell me to go to a particular place at a particular time and a particular thing would happen ... and that EVEN THOUGH I tried to avoid being in that place at the that time, I was there and the event occurred just as that annoyingly accurate voice said....
If I told you I chased, paganism, witchcraft, atheism and of course cold rationalism along with a few others with some pretty dogoned diligent fervor...
Would you still be incredulous that Sir Dent may believe in a God that would send your children to hell, but disrespect that fact that the core of my beliefs were in fact passed down from generation to generation ... some might assume that you think you love your children more than my parents and grandparents have loved me.... I might not be one of those ... but some might read that into your statements ...
Would you still dismiss me and my experience by "helping" me come to your conclusion ... because my parents and grandparents and grandparents before them and so on happened to believe something similar and it is therefore "ancient"?
Please understand that I do not doubt your sincerity, your honesty or your integrity, but I find that statement, while well intentioned, to be a bit arrogant.
So, thank you very much for wanting to "help". It is no doubt well intentioned. However, I respectfully decline your offer. I find the ancient ways quite satisfactory, thank you. It seems irrational to me to assume that you, who appear in your picture to be not yet 40 years old, have enough experience to dispense with the "ancient" ways of thinking something that may or may not be "better".
And if you think that makes me biased, well, then I guess I agree with that. I gladly admit that at this point in my life's journey I have a Pro-Christ bias.
The only things I'll add to this -other than to say please see my response to Holli- is that A) the mind is a powerful thing. B) your personal revelations can have no effect on my opinions, since then I'd have to consider everyone's personal revelations, and of course they all vary and contradict, C) why would I discount or disrespect your ancestors for being products of their time, D) my ancestors were christians too, right down to my own parents, E) anyone who reads into my statements that I think I love my children more than your parents loved you is really, really, really out there and has extremely poor reading comprehension skills, F) I am not incredulous that people believe in all sorts of things, that's obvious, I just in some cases think some of these beliefs are detrimental to society and so in such cases therefore refuse to passively accept it, G) yes, I have been told before that many people much smarter than I figued all this stuff out a long time ago, and so we should all just accept the results of their thinking, but I think that's kind of dumb since they also figured out that the world was flat, women were incapable of rational thought and stars were just holes in the sky dome, H) if you told me you had chased several different "isms" with some "pretty dogoned fervor" (witchcraft? really? with fervor?)honestly I'd have to wonder about both your rationality and your stability, don't you think, I) I am not interested in "helping" you, or anyone else in particular, I'm interested in preserving the ideas of this country and the stability of this world for the sake of future generations, J) I honestly think it's best for some people to just go on believing as they always have K) thank you for what you said about my sincerity and L) ... do I really look 40? Really?
(sigh)
Thanks for your input. Sorry so short with you but I think the main charge of my arrogance is answered in my reply to Holli.
You're welcome.
Actually I said, "Under 40" ... I revised it upward from my actual estimate after remembering that you said that you had been monogamous for over 20 years.
I understand. Our posts crossed in cyberspace!
Oh thank you! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
I don't mind getting old, I'm just not thrilled with the physical effects of it.
Only 40? I'm goina start calling you BG
For baby Girl.
The most encouraging thing I can say about being 40 is that "this is as good as it's goina get"
as far as body pains go anyway.
"There is no conclusive evidence of life after death. But there is not evidence of any sort against it. Soon enough you will know. So why fret about it?"
--R.A.Heinlein
Hi There isn't any fretting going on here. Just some healthy discussion. Pandora is a good debater! Isn't it great to be civil? Holly
So - are people who know God better than those who do not in some way?
Are they just and righteous?
Do they always make the "right" choice?
Are they in any way shape or form better?
And which God are we talking about? You said yourself that the Muslim God is not the same as yours.
Muslims make exactly the same claim as you do.
They Know God and are Righteous.
One of you is Wrong.
I think this is where the problems start. "So - are people who know God better than those who do not in some way? " No - some people want to think they are better. Join a church and you'll find that the back stabbing and cliques are terrible. There are so many people who claim they "know" God and are not very nice people.
Too many believers take the word "righteous" out of context.
While I am a believer, I am by no means "righteous", I'm certainly not better than anyone and I make poor choices all the time (like posting in the religious forum )
I don't get the whole "we vs. them" attitude. If only we could just accept each other for who we are, forget about the religious/non religious/political affiliations and move on....
Scientists have what is known as the scientific method. It basically goes like this. Someone comes up with a theory or an idea on how something works. They then propose certain tests to prove their theory or idea. If the tests are successful and the tests are seen by other scientists to be correct then the theory or idea is proven. Data and back up data is what it is all about. Scientists can get it wrong because they lack enough essential information to get it right. Once upon a time scientists believed that rising bad smells caused disease. On this false belief the great sewage system London enjoys today was constructed. Since then we are able to look through microscopes at what does cause disease. The early scientists mistook cause for effect but they were on the right track. The sewage system created for London in the 19th Century was a great success and spurred other major cities to do likewise.
Actually I am not too sure that this is what CAUSES disease. But no question it is how disease works, once caused
Off-topic, but are you saying a theory is not a fact?
I actually thought they came up with a hypothesis first. So they can see the bacteria, particle, etc. . . that cause diseases. What causes the bacteria particles. etc. . .?
Misha germs and bacteria cause disease. There are also good and bad bacteria. The good bacteria actually eat the bad bacteria. But none of this was known before we could actually look into a microscope and see the little menaces. There were those that theorized about the existence of these little bacteria creatures. There were Arab men of learning in the Middle Ages that thought these creatures must exist. Hence in Arab hospitals in the period people with various sicknesses were separated from the healthy and from one another. But in the west we believed up until the microscope in bad smells causing disease.
Bad smells of course do not cause illness or disease but are a byproduct of the illness or disease. Even so, in the 19th Century when they got it wrong they still managed to come up with the correct solution. the solution? Build a bigger better sewage system. So even coming up with the wrong idea can sometimes lead to the right solution.
A theory can be the embryo of a fact in science. The hypothesis is the idea. What if ......came from ........? This is your hypothesis or my idea. Now how to prove if this is correct or incorrect comes next.
Bad smells are around when people catch fever and die therefore bad smells are responsible for these deaths was the belief that scientists proved to be incorrect when they could see the little horrors and come up with what we know to be true today.
What causes the bacteria to appear in large enough quantities to be a threat has a lot to do with food and opportunity. Keep things clean and you have less harmful bacteria around.
That would have to be Satan, according to your book!
And you failed to answer the question.
If science is so wonderful that it deserves your utmost reverance, don't you think you should know a little more about it?
I was trying to not use logic and reasoning and this is the answer I came up with. I now understand the whole blind faith thing. Don't think at all, just believe. So simple!
livelonger is correct to a point but I get the feeling it isn't an answer that will satisfy SirDent. Bacteria latch onto us very soon after we are born. There are bacteria that live off dead skin cells. We shed our skin cells and produce new ones. Very young children are very good at doing this hence you hear some women talk about the fresh smell of a baby's skin.
I get a feeling SirDent will take us to which came first the chicken or the egg. Well if we go there we won't find much in the way of an answer unless we leave science and turn to religion.
That's not exactly what I was talking about Rod.
There are countless accounts of people exposed to the same level of bacterial - umm - exposure - sorry for that - yet some people get sick while others don't. Obviously there is more to the cause of disease than just bacterial exposure.
True, Misha! That's why medicine is an art instead of a science.
Misha you are right. there is more to it. Just as two men brought up in the same village who are the same age might not necessarily have the same strength when it comes to say boxing these two men may not have the same strength in their antibodies to shrug off infection including the various diseases.
We know upbringing and family background play a part in all of this.
Recently there was a documentary about a scientist who wondered why more people did not die of the final black plague to hit England. This may seem like a funny thing to want to research but he felt that in the answer there might be ways of dealing with present day diseases.
What this scientist found was that in one village in England that had been hit by the black death but only a third of the population had died there was indeed an answer. He got samples from those whose ancestors got the plague but survived. What he found in the samples amazed him. There was something in their DNA that prevented the black death from being fatal to their ancestors and to this day it sits dormant within these people to do the same trick again. What's more, this scientist was able to synthesize from the blood this natural fighter against plague and it is being used today in the battle against cancer and also AIDS.
Scientists know that we can pump up our immune systems in a number of ways. 3 square meals a day helps. Having weakened germs given to us so our antibodies get to fight weaker examples of a disease also helps. This is called immunization.
As for medicine habee, new strains of old diseases and new diseases do come up. Not being careful in the way we use antibiotics has produced strains of disease with some immunity to our major defense against them. Look at it as war. We are winning and have been doing so for some time.
I hope that answers your question.
uhm. Medical Science is a science you dolt.
Life -of any kind- will thrive given the opportunity.
Of course you are right Pandoras Box. It just amazes me where life can in fact exist.
They have found forms of bacteria living in boiling water near living volcanoes.
There is an underground river in the USA that never sees the light of day. The fish in this river are blind because their world is totally without light but they live and they thrive.
don't want to detract from the conversation, but I just loved this post RodMarsden...
Ghost fish right? Or something like that. Albino ghost fish? I read about them... in a Trixie Belden mystery book like 30 years ago, hah! Thanks for the memory.
Yes life is amazing. When I was young I never cared much for science. Now I wish I'd paid more attention.
I had a question for you about something ancient egyptian, but now I can't remember what it was......
It'll come back to me. I gotta go take my ginkgo.
Yes PB life is amazing.
I learned that from my dad when I was a kid. He reminds me every now and then.
He never had the education to become a naturalist but he knows a lot about the bush from patient study and I got an interest in natural science from him.
I'd be curious as to what you want to know about Ancient Egypt I might be able to help you with.
Yeh my father and I never had too much of an education either, but man he loved to learn!
I can't recall. I'm trying to remember but I can't. Eh fergit it. I'll get back to you if I remember. My problem is I read stuff without taking notes. My problem is I'm getting old!
Sounds like your dad was really something.
There is formal education which I have and then there's going out and finding out stuff because its in your nature to do so anyway.
We'd be on a drive in the country and my dad would pull over, get out of the car real excited and urge us to do the same. Then we'd quietly walk back in the direction we'd just come from and there would be an echidna (a spiny anteater) on the side of the road making tracks back into the bush. My dad had stopped to get a good look at it. Admittedly I do have a soft spot for those critters nowadays.
On other drives we'd check out emus and kangaroos. It wasn't because we had to but because we wanted to.
On bush walks there would be liar birds, blue tongue lizards, geckos etc. What I got from my dad was first hand stuff. Sometimes it went hand in hand with fishing.
On one occasion I put a line in the Clarence at night and about an hour into the fishing I noticed a really young white owl in a tree no more than ten feet away. He stayed with me for about two hours. I suppose we were both fishing. I didn't mind the company and I suppose he felt the same way. A nice experience.
Yeah the incident with the owl sounds like a special kind of experience, the kind you keep with you forever.
Your dad sounds wonderful. My dad, like most dads I reckon, was great. He also, like most people, had both his good points and his bad points.
But he did love learning and he loved history and he was an expert I am sure on American history. He was passionate about the ideas behind the founding of our country, and he was passionate about treating people well, when he was in his right and sober mind.
He always loved children, he was fun that way, but he had trouble relating to us on a one to one level as we grew up, so after a certain momentous point in my family's history, he distanced himself from us. He came home late at night and banged around in the kitchen, in the morning he'd be gone again, whatever book he was currently reading lying on the table and that was it.
Prior to that though he used to engage us all in the best conversations about stuff. Later, after my mother left him and moved away and I was the only child left at home since I was the youngest by several years, well I got into alot of trouble at one point. Then he made more of an effort to be home, and we had some more great discussions, even about religion which we totally disagreed on. I was 15 that year. Then I got myself into some more trouble, and he didn't speak to me for years after that until one day he said it out of the blue as I was leaving the house one day "you know I love you, don't you?"
Surprisingly perhaps, I did. Ah shit.
He died last year. I miss him.
But now I know that oddly enough, despite all the bad stuff and the many silent years, I learned so much from him, and I'm alot like him.
Well, gee, that was fun. I'll have to write about him some day and get it all out.
I think it's good to realize that most believers also believe their own religion makes the most sense.
that is preposterous Randy, come on man.
science has proved nothing -correct or incorrect; valid or invalid.
the notion to even consider it dismisses the claim. science has only explored the premise of 'maybe' with what, discoveries of their own unearthing and relics of potion makers and fire breathers, that only advanced the ritual expression of their time -if anything, validating the notion of the gods and purposes of men...
faith -in pure form- cannot be equated or sensationalized no matter how much 'roughage' is consumed/expelled.
as for logic, neither the science or sensation behind either has any validity. both attempt critique, both hypothecate, both defend, both lack even the basic universal nano of logic...
logic is reserved for philo. Show me philo and i will readily accept your indulgence of the Need To Know...
Science, with its logic, enables you to sit at home and deny its mere existence while others can see your words all over the world. This is the power of logic. Most of the things you utilize in your life has basis using human logic. The same could be accomplished without any religious influence at all. What has religion given us?
The thing about science is...it gets results!
Twenty One Days when I am sick I would rather go to a doctor who practices tried and true medicine than to a medicine man.
Yes Jane Bovary science does get results and yes Sir dent there are always unpleasant side effects to be had in the gathering of knowledge.
Using science wisely...not a bad notion.
You bring a valid argument to the table. And you're right ... not all scientists agree on everything. However, when the prize on the plate is one's eternal salvation there can't be any mistakes.
For example ...
Let's say one religion states you must believe Jesus was the son of God or you won't go to Heaven
And then another religion states Jesus was only a prophet and believing he is the son of God is blasphemy.
Two diverging opinions ... both can't be right. There is a possibility both could be wrong, but zero possibility both can be right as they directly oppose each other.
So ... which path do you follow? Guess the wrong one and you wind up in a bad place. See what I mean about the endless confusion with religion?
And to make matters worse, both of these religions would tell you they are right and the other is wrong. And when you ask for proof you are told you just need to believe or that the truth will be revealed through prayer.
Why should there be any confusion?
Bill Gates runs Microsoft and has a handbook he hands all employees that outlines his expectations. In none of Microsoft's offices is there any confusion on who runs the business or on what rules one needs to follow. Why can't religion be the same way?
On the other side of the coin:
some scientists think we evolved from apes
Some scientists think we evolved on our own unique family tree
Now both groups of scientists can't be right, but in the case where either or both are wrong, what harm comes of us for listening to them?
This is why science can't be thought of in the same reference as religion as there is no eternal damnation in science for believing the wrong theory - unless you are predicting an asteroid strike upon the Earth.
really? then why does the classic claim totality over the romantic?
though i agree, neither is accurate or honest.
using your example:
Jesus or Y`shua or Iesous. The man himself claimed those believing should NOT worship him or his human name, yet 99% of them do. Why?
This man NEVER SAID unless you have a personal relationship with me, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven...
What religion -like science states- is there is no answer within the structure of the Ism, so one must supersede those assumed premises -knowing both sides well- and accept Purity...
Unfortunately, your answer states the case I made very eloquently.
99% (according to your account) say you must worship Jesus. You're saying this is not the case. So ... what if I never met you and only met the other 99%. I could go on believing I should worship Jesus and would never know any different.
And with the converse ... I could meet only you and assume you must be right that we should not worship Jesus. And then I would find the 99% that believe differently. Should I shift my belief?
Endless confusion ... all caused by humans who can't confirm an absolute confusion.
I'd love to have severl husbands! I could keep one home to play with me, have a couple doing yard work or home repairs, and send the rest out to work and make money!
Yeah, but I don't think hubby would be too keen on the idea. I dunno, though, if he could always be the one to stay home and have fun with me, he might be willing to share! lol
i am not agree with you. people not afraid but they think that it may be hurt someone's religious feeling if they say something streight forward.
I guess that's my problem and why everywhere I go people hate me. I was raised to be straight-forward. My dad was saddled with five daughters he could not understand for the life of him. "Cut the crap" and "out with it already" were his two favorite phrases I think.
Funny thing is I have always seen straight-forwardness as a good thing. But I guess littering my posts with more disclaimers and platitudes might be a good thing.
Thanks for posting.
Didn't mean it seriously. It was something I felt years ago when I started questioning religion. For awhile I was caught in the middle, arguing with everybody, lol. Couldn't believe in the b.s. of christianity after I had learned enough about it, but it took me a long time to give it all up. I kept thinking somebody had the right answers, and unfortunately I am a tiny bit of an intellectual snob. I just kept figuring the christians I was asking just weren't smart enough or informed enough to know the right answers. It was really hard to understand that for centuries people had believed in all that b.s. and it was all just that.
So I argued and argued and argued. I was literally asked by the preacher at one baptist church to just leave. Well, what he said (after a great big sigh) was something along the lines of maybe the baptist church just wasn't right for me. Then he held his breath, lol, hoping and praying he could dump me off on the methodists without any further argument, rofl.
In retrospect knowing what I do today it was really funny. Poor guy.
We don't need a reason to hate you, we just do. get over it
I feel all persecuted. I'm taking my toys and going home.
I'd like to add to the discussion of germs and bacteria.
We see them as bad things, because they have the potential to take us out and we are fully aware of it. If the cows, chicken, fish, pigs, etc that we ourselves feed upon were aware that we'd be taking them out they'd see us as the bad things, as the plague of the earth. Most if not all life forms have predators, and serve as prey, and also are predators feeding upon prey in the form of other life forms.
Almost nothing that we eat was not a living thing before it came to our plates. We feed off of living things, to sustain our own lives.
Germs are merely another life form, struggling to survive, and serving as predator and prey. Germs are no more 'bad' or 'evil' or 'unfortunate' than any other life form, including ourselves.
Maybe it's the earth's way of maintaining balance.
As for the balance thing you talk about Pandoras Box you just happen to be spot on. This does not mean, however, that we will stop attacking the creatures that want to make a meal out of us in one form or another.
When I talk about good and bad bacteria what I really mean to do is differentiate between the bacteria that is either harmless or useful to us as opposed to the bacteria that feeds off us in such a way that it makes us ill and can even end our lives.
Oh yeah. When I referred to bacteria not being any more bad than any other life form I wasn't referring to what you said, but rather to what perhaps Mr. Dent believed about it. The way he kept begging the question seemed to indicate that he really did think bacteria came from the devil or was a result of sin or something equally ... out there.
And yeah I kill the little buggers with a vengence. I have no tolerance for any sort of creepy crawlies in my home.
killing the little buggers, well, that just makes you one of us..a human being PB.
Some scientists reckon that gardening is a good way to give your antibodies some exercise.
damn. I thought I was a goddess.
Really? 'xplain, Lucy.
Does our digging in the dirt expose us and strengthen our immunity, is that it?
No quite a goddess.
Who is Lucy?
It was an article I read in New Science some years ago. Yes the theory goes that by exposing ourselves to mostly harmless bacteria but the sort not found in the home you are giving your immune system something to wrestle with thus it is strengthened.
Lucy? I love Lucy, the TV show. Ricky Ricardo and his mischievous wife Lucy who'd have herself ridiculous escapades every episode, prompting Ricky to demand in his spanish (puerto rican?) accent "'xplain, Lucy!"
An american idiom I guess.
I thought it was "you got some 'splainin to do, Lucy!"
Yes! That too. I remembered the shorter version, but you're right I'm sure. The way you put it was the much more popular saying.
Oh now I remember PB.
Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz starred in I love Lucky. What I loved most about them is that together they formed Desilu and on the Desilu lot were produced two of my all time favorite shows, THE UNTOUCHABLES (Desi Arnaz introduced the first episode) and the original STAR TREK.
I Love Lucy was okay but I hated the show she did with her kids.
During the reds under the bed scare Desi was accused of being a red because he was Cuban. He said as Ricky on I Love Lucy that the only thing red about him and his show was Lucy's hair. He loved the USA and had come to it as a poor player in hope of fame and fortune and managed to get both. He had escaped poverty and communism and thought it absurd he should ever be thought of as communist simply because of where he was born.
Sounds like you have a lot to say about your dad PB.
Mine also wasn't perfect. He found raising four kids hard going and there was times when money was tight. I think he tended to worry too much about that.
PB I was amazed that you said this! I like you, your style, the way you write and the fact that you are forthright. All admirable traits in my book!
ditto.
Hey guys, I know it's a little too late being that is just passed midnight here in Detroit...
But, yesterday was 4-20.
I just checked in a RedGage and guess what my earnings are? Yep. $4.20.
Why wasn't I celebrating? Well, I was still at work at 4:20.
By the way, no offense intended to you Habee, when I called christianity B.S. I'm not sure if you're a believer or not.
I am a Christian, but I'm not into organized religion. I'm not offended, PB. I believe in tolerance and each person choosing his or her own path. It's not for me to judge if someone wants to believe in God, fairies, leprechauns, or nothing at all. Each to his own!
I wonder why it should make any difference. If you care enough to not mean any offense, and you're worried that some term you might use could cause offense, rephrase the statement. You can be straightforward and polite at the same time, and you're usually pretty good at that.
Ron, get this girl some of your cupcakes as way of apology!
I don't have any cup cakes and habee has been alright in my book all along anyway. She has curiosity on her side. I don't knock people who can think and would like answers.
I have only earned a few cents in reality, the rest was a bonus for something. Probably biggest loser or something. I reckon I will just post pics from now on, they seem to get the most attention.
Yep
Pics do the best. I think folks over there have a short attention span. Reading is hard
I'm kidding. There is some amazing photography there.
Take it easy, I'm heading to bed.
Sorry for the hijack PB
I'm the last person you should apologize to for hijacking a thread Jen. I go off-topic all the time. I couldn't stay on one train of thought if I tried! I know, cause I've tried.
Really ? In that case you need to teach me astrophysics or even microelectronics. Let's start with semiconductors,don't end this by making conclusion "god did it by doping". (oops, god approves doping)
If i could not swim...i would stay out of the water too.
The only people who know what happens after death are the dead and they aren't telling.
Hokey! I missed ya man. Haven't seen you in ages. Or, a couple of weeks anyway. How's Kentucky?
Kentucky is going well. Got some work playing some clubs. Went to Thunder over Louisville the other night. Best fireworks show in the country. How are you PB?
Pretty well. Trying to get more focused on writing and learning the ropes of SEO. Discovering that people perceive me as arrogant and.. 40. Normal stuff.
On a happier note, spring has sprung, my goldfish -who just hibernated their first winter in the outdoor pond are still alive (yay!). I was sure they were dead. On a less happy note, my pool is full of frogs which my youngest insists we save.
Still, spring has sprung, and like Pandora I feel the satyrs hammering for me to come out and play!
As far as your youngest is concerned, I am on this person's side. I too have a soft spot for frogs and if you can save them great.
Cane toads no Australian is fond of because they are very destructive of the environment and don't really belong here.
Ever hear of frog maps? Its a way of noting where there is a healthy ecosystem happening and where there is not. If there are frogs in a swampy area or near water or they appear after heavy rain then your ecosystem is doing well. If there should be frogs and there are none around then your ecosystem could be in real trouble. Naturalists map out an area using frogs as a guide.
Frogs are a real treasure. I especially like big green tree frogs.
Autumn for me but a mild one so far.
Oh yeah, we got frogs. A whole symphony of 'em. That's how I know it's spring. And yeah, we'll save them, thanks to her. There's a horse and cow pasture out behind our house with a watering hole which is less than 100 feet from our back fence, so they always get in the pool throughout the season, one or two at a time. Then they get sucked into the skimmer and trapped in the filter basket and that makes it easy to catch them and take back out to the watering hole. But I don't know how these got there under the liner during the winter. Unfortunately we had a pipe crack in the pump this winter during a freeze, which has not yet been fixed, so the pump has been off for a couple of months now. The water is green, making it harder to see them, and they move much faster than I can move the net around under the water.
They are cute, but they're very hard to catch! We got about six or seven yesterday, and we'll see how many more we can catch today. I think maybe they hatched in the pool, I dunno.
I used to do the fish thing.
It is usually recomended to completely empty the water out of the goldfish pool for a good cleaning. Fish are easy to catch when the pool ia empty. The emulsion at the bottom of the pool is the best fertalizer ya can get.Don't waste it.
That is why ya clean the pool. that stuff feeds algea. But save as much of the pool water as ya can to keep the fish in while cleaning the pool.
also put that water that the fish are kept in back in the pool with the fish.
Yeah we did that over the weekend. I don't know why but the fish still aren't coming up at all, even for food. I guess the water temp is still a bit too cold.
But they're all there. I expected them all to be dead. I know they should have survived, but I hadn't been able to get any to come to the surface, or anywhere near it, so it was a relief to see them.
Now I just have to hope the process didn't traumatize them to death! Being awakened from their long winter's nap and rounded up into buckets might not have been a great way to start the year. In fact, if I had really thought they were still living, I probably wouldn't have done it yet but given them more time. But I had stirred the bottom a few times and nothing came up, so i was really sure they were goners.
Well frogs are cute. Tthey are also an indicator that the environment is A okay.
Catching them sounds like good exercise and something you can do with your daughter PB.
I hope the fish continue to survive.
Hello,
What a nice post i like it most A water filter is installed under the sink. It gets water from under the sink from the cold water line, and heated water is connected to a different countertop faucet. These are popular because the purifiers are not sitting on top of the countertop. By the water filter not being on the top of the counter it does not get in the way or have tubes connecting to the sink faucet.
Thanks for this sharing.
Good to see you're alive and kicking, Hokey. You've been missed.
When ever the water temp falls below 60 deg. they begin to go into a hybernation state and do not eat. You can actually quick freeze them and they come back to life when thawed.
The reason that they die in winter is cause they caint breath when the Ice covers the surface long enough for the oxigen to be depleated in the water.
Don't worry about feeding them till ya see them moving around looking for algae on the sides of the pool.
An long as there is algae or plants in the pool ya don't have to feed them at all. Just feed them when ya want to look at them.
I errored earlier and fixed it That would be 60 degrees WATER TEMP,when they stop eating. Cause their metabolism slows down too much to eat at that point.
Hey PANDORA'S BOX! I think I may have figured out what you wanted to ask me about Egypt...Of course I could be wrong...
Jean-Champollion, the great French scholar and the man who cracked the code to the Egyptian hieroglyphs wouldn't have stood a chance of doing so even with information from the Rosetta stone if not for the aid of Egyptian Christian monks and their form of writing which is in direct line to the more ancient form of writing. The way the monks wrote could be compared to the hieroglyphs the way we might compare the Saxon form of writing to modern English. Anyway these Egyptian Christians can trace their ancestry back to Ancient Egypt where modern day Muslim Egyptians can't unless somewhere in their ancestry there was an Egyptian Christian.
Anyway I ambushed a Muslim a while back by asking how Egyptian Muslims can discriminate against Egyptian Christians when just to look at the pyramids the ancestors of the Christian Egyptians had so much more going for them than their ancestors. I argued that Egyptian Christians should be respected and not discriminated against. I went on to say that not all Muslims in Egypt do discriminate against Egyptian Christians but still it is a practice that should stop if Muslims expect us to look upon them with any real sympathy.
There have been two documentaries on this discrimination.
As for the role of Egyptian monks in the cracking of the ancient Egyptian form of tomb writing check out The keys of Egypt by Lesley and Roy Adkins.
WARNING: Long Post Ahead, Feel Free To Detour
That wasn't it, but i'll take it! LOL
Naw, what I've been gathering my facts for lately is either stuff having to do with greek mythology (totally useless, I know) and mormonism. Both have connections with Egypt, or both subjects do, I should say, but knowing the way my mind works and my research goes whatever it was doesn't necessarily have anything to do directly with those connections. And in fact, probably doesn't, because if it did I would have pursued the questions myself to finish my research.
But don't worry about it. It was just something that struck my curiosity and made me think to myself 'dude, I should ask that australian dude about that'.
I then apparently promptly forgot whatever it was. So it couldn't have been too very important.
I'm not all that great at gathering facts on this type of stuff anymore. I used to be years ago when I was into the religion pursuit, but now I'm just getting back into all of this. You know, life interferes with one's pursuits, so it's been years since I've really done this sort of thing. But the private school I worked at laid off a bunch of us last year, and I decided to give it all a go, enjoy it while I have the time, and see what I've really got.
My habit though is just to gather impressions rather than facts, you know, enough to satisfy my own curiosity, and when I started writing about this stuff I realized that I needed facts. Not vague unsupported summaries of my impressions. So I was doing that, but not in the bestest way I am sure.
Now I'm sorting my way through everything I've gathered, and trying to sort it out, finding half of it doesn't really fit in, interesting though it is, and trying to not write books out of it all, which as you can tell by my posts is difficult.
The art of conciseness has never been among my strengths.
Specifically I've been working on Pandora's Box more or less since I signed up here a few months ago. I actually used to write here under another name, about political stuff, but then when my dad passed away last year I kind of just stopped everything for a while.
When I decided to come back here I decided I didn't want to do politics again, but the greater mysteries of life which really inspire me and interest me. Politics, however worthy a cause, does not inspire so much.
A couple of hubs I wrote off the cuff I am really not happy with, though they're doing okay -okay being relative of course. I get so off track. Pandora's box itself has turned already into at least four different hubs, with another that only peripherally concerns Pandora, cause I can't cram everything I want to say into one hub and expect people to read the whole derned thing.
Kinda like most of my posts. Another thing I have to be careful about is flow. These things are tricky for me. Easy enough in simpler subjects, but difficult on other things.
I'm taking it all waaaaay too seriously, writing and rewriting, and scrapping it and starting over, then I decided to divide it all, which meant revising what i'd already done. I expect publication some time after the world ends in 2012.
And the truth is I oughtta scrap it altogether and just write a dozen hubs on electronics or something but I'm too stubborn. This is what I want to write about, and I'm gonna wrestle the thing out of me and end up producing a piece of work so mauled and strangled and resuscitated that it's gonna be completely void of any passion or style and downright painful to read.
But then it'll be behind me and I can move on, and hopefully by the time I finish the half dozen or so hubs on mormonism I'll know better what I'm doing and then can do better justice to my next subject. Though in truth I'm thinking of flushing most of the mormonism hubs and just using them as an example of how religion in general is -...misleading. Let us say.
Thanks for thinking of it though, but don't let it worry you. The last thing I need right now really is more to think about!
But it's definitely better than not having enough to think about it, that's for sure!
Good luck in whatever you decide to do. Mormons are really an American thing right up until they come to your door and try to convert you. I haven't managed to scare up much interest in them.
As for Egypt well there is a lot of ground there to cover.
There was one ruler who came up with the idea that there is only one god you should worship and that is the sun god. The symbol he promoted, the ankh, is also the symbol of life. It has a remarkable similarity to the Christian crucifix. In any event, there is the possibility the Jews settled on the idea of there being one god only from spending time in captivity in Egypt.
Freemasons claim to have a connection with the pyramid builders and also the builders of Solomon's temple. Most likely the only real claim they can make is to a connection with the cathedral builders of the middle ages.
I have played around with Freemasonry a bit in my vampire short stories and my vampire novel Disco Evil. My Freemason vampire hunters, The Secret Compass, will also be active in my up coming novel Ghost Dance. I have a number of world branches of my Secret Compass including the Maclean Secret Compass who are fighting Scots whose fighting techniques originate with the Knights Templar that fled into Scotland from England during the persecutions.
Oh yeah I know who you're talking about. Can't remember his name though. Tut's father, wasn't it? Starts with an A. I think. Ahmena- something or the other.
Freemasonry seems like a natural fit for a vampire novel. Great idea. And dude! I just looked you up and saw your books on amazon! Four of them there, that is fantastic!
I'm gonna have to read them.
Four books! Wow you've done well. I tried writing a book based around a cherokee legend. Couldn't get past the first couple of chapters. I kept changing my mind about certain aspects of the plot and revising, revising, revising.
Oh that is so wonderful, what an accomplishment! Just to finish a single short story is an accomplishment, but four whole books! And published!
I gotta check you out.
Thanks PB.
I started out with articles and short stories. I still go back to the short story from time to time.
If you want to write a novel I suggest you start with a short story and see how that goes. The thing is that you can then take the economy you need for the short story across to the larger work and it can prevent you from getting into a muddle.
Also I think in terms of roughs. Very few truly great writers I have read about or come across get their novel right in the first draft. Usually this is the time to think about flow and construction and characterization. Feel free to whack in everything. Hell, you can take the garbage out with the second draft and look for ways to make the whole thing read smooth in the third draft where you also check to see if your sub-plots line up nicely with the main plot and it all makes sense.
So what I am saying is work in stages rather than think it will all happen in one great spurt of energy. And do have fun with the first draft. If you enjoy yourself and are inspired you can pass these things onto the reader.
James A. Michener took eight drafts to write his novel Hawaii. Dickens was known to work in drafts and the same with Mark Twain. So there you have it. If great writers can't get it right first time up and don't expect to then I don't see myself doing it.
I sometimes think of the Chinese saying that a walk of a thousand miles begins with one step. It is very much like that with writing.
Yes Freemasonry came to my attention when I discovered how secretive Freemasons traditionally have been. Also they tend to pop up in top positions in both American and Australian history. Benjamin Franklin was a Freemason and so was Sir Walter Burley Griffin who designed the city of Canberra. Whats more, it has been said that both Washington and Canberra have Freemason protective devices designed into them to ward off evil. With this sort of background I feel inclined to make my vampire hunters Freemasons.
Cherokee legend? Sounds interesting. I touch upon Aboriginal legends sometimes in my writing.
Well I'm not sure I'm creative enough. I think I'm better at explaining stuff than I am at actually having original thoughts. Then it was like, it felt so.. outdated, like my writing style was outdated. I read like a book from the seventies or something.
So I don't know. We'll see. Thanks for the tips though. I do certainly have the time now for it. Or I would have the time, if I stayed out of the forums!
The legends are awesome.
Freemasonry is intriguing, that's for sure. You gotta wonder what goes on at the top, and what secrets they might know.
So tell me, in a couple of words how would you describe your Disco book? What genre would you call it, other than vampire lit? Are they in a series or complete stand-alones?
PB my novel Disco Evil is what they now call Dark Fantasy. You can call it vampire lit or horror if you like. Horror is the main genre and the rest are sub-genres. All mentioned are appropriate in one way or another.
Disco Evil is about a 20 something lad with dark thoughts on his mind when he is seduced by a female vampire and becomes one of the undead. She has an agenda to rid the world of what she considers to be arrogant men lacking in intelligence with a tendency to act like Nazi brutes. She was made over into a vampire during WW2 so she has that in her background.
In ridding the world of such men she realizes it would be a good thing to have as an ally a male vampire she has sired who will eliminate females who are in their own way Nazi brutes. Paul Priestly, the main male character of Disco Evil, fits the bill. He will go after the female savages while she takes on the male savages. In this way both vampires justify their existence and continued existence.
One of the early victims of Paul turns out to be the niece of a Secret Compass field agent. Thus begins a chase that takes him and the vampire he is after around the world.
The second vampire book in what I hope will be a trilogy is titled Ghost Dance. It involves a Secret Compass psychic, a young man becoming a werewolf who needs to be saved from the family curse, a warlock intent on eliminating a third of the world's population in order to save the other two thirds, a female vampire who develops a soft spot for the young man becoming a werewolf and a dagger that, placed in the right hand, might again save Worms (Voems),Germany from a terrible fate.
The title Ghost Dance has a number of meanings within the book. For example there are the skeletal dancers that appeared on woodcuts during the Black Death. There's Carnivale in Venice where at the stroke of midnight one is to remove one's mask. The upshot here is that you could have been dancing with someone ordinary or someone literally not, or perhaps no longer, of this world.
Ghost Dance should come out in two or three months.
The third book of my trilogy is Torch Song. In the 1960s in the Blue Mountains of NSW a town has been tricked by vampires into believing the atomic war has begun. They take shelter in nearby caves where they remain until the Secret Compass breaks the vampire's mental hold upon them. In the invasion of the town and the rescuing of the cave dwellers from forever being milked of blood by the undead, a young vampire woman loses her husband. How will she manage on her own? Will the Secret Compass hunt down the vampire leaders who had maintained the town and its horrid secret?
Torch Song will be the most involved of the novels.
I wrote about the Secret Compass and also my Asian equivalent, the Rising Sun Group in a couple of my short stories which were published in the Undead Reb collection so my vampire hunters have been well thought out over time.
The first book Disco Evil is probably the darkest of the three.
Ghost Dance has all the hallmarks of an adventure novel with fangs and hair and magic.
Torch Song is the one more firmly set in the 21st Century and apart from other things looks at people who are of the 20th Century and somewhat out of touch. You might say my version of Brave New World only its the world of today versus 1965.
So there you go PB.
I love the concept, good vs. evil, mixture of each among the tribes and characters, combined with elements of legend, sounds fantastic! You have to put an Amazon link to it at the end of the hub. I loved the first chapter of Disco Evil, and I'm gonna order it. Is Amazon the preferred purchase portal? Is it better for you if it's ordered from somewhere else?
Amazon is fine thanks.
And thank you for your interest PB.
are we in the religious forums now, as i am feeling a little scared...
We have a flight home for Sunday, at last, if you want to come to Dublin airport for a few pint of guiness, sometime Monday, drinks are on me...
Mmmm! Guiness! You do have a good argument going for you there poetlorraine...
I have one or two on St Patrick's day....Not much of a drinker really.
Alright I didn't go through the entire thread so pardon me if these points have been mentioned before. But I will like to throw in my 2 cents about the religion topic.
First a little about myself. I am 22 years old and out of my life of 22 years I had been a Muslim for 21 years. Now I am an atheist. For the time I was Muslim, I literally had no idea what the religion was about. I never read the Quran because it is in Arabic and I don't understand even a word of Arabic. But there was this voice inside me that always said that Islam is a good religion and it is the only true religion and every other religion is wrong. Sounds familiar?
Well this is the basis of every religion. They have to discard the beliefs of other religions because every other religion jeopardizes their credibility.
I always used to think that once I get the time, I will study the religion in more detail and find out the truth about Islam. I will show everyone why they have been wrong about Islam all along and why it is the ONLY true religion. Because at that time I believed sincerely that Islam was the true religion.
But once I actually got the time to think about it and study a little bit about the religion, I realized there is absolutely nothing special about it. I am not going to go into the details into why I gave up Islam in particular. But I came to know the faults in religions in particular.
The place I live in right now is very religious. Every one is fanatic muslim and everyone is 100% sure they are going to heaven when they die. This has made them so ridiculously complacent that they don't really care about this world. In fact, they don't even care if they do anything immoral which isn't mentioned in Islam as immoral. None of them try to make this world a better place because they think that this is only temporary.
This makes me feel more and more disgusted every day. This made me realize that there are only two possibilities with religions and the eternal life after death.
1. If there is no God, then I live a life living it and die happily.
2. If there is a God, and Islam is true. Then imagine a heaven filled with muslims with beard like Osama Bin Laden and smug smiles on their faces. None of them drink, have sex, and/or eat pork. On the other hand their is hell, which contains the greatest personalities in the world. From Abraham Lincon, to Mahatma Gandhi to Angelina Jolie. (Please take note, I am talking about Islam over here. This will be the result according to Islam.) So, if this is the case then I will choose hell over heaven any day.
Of course their is the possibility that some other religion is the true religion. But the scenario will almost be the same in each case, because according to every religion, anyone that doesn't follow it is going to hell.
So either ways, I am content.
Testify, brother!
Oh my gods I sound like a redneck.
I loved your post. Thank you so much for sharing. I'd have so much to say if I didn't really have to get going here.
In short, I know how you feel. Well almost. I was only a 'christian' for about 4 or 5 years. The ultimate deciding factor for me when I finally put it all away was that if a god existed who would punish us for honest thinking, then I didn't want to kneel at his feet anyway. If I pretended to believe, I'd lose all self-respect.
I hope you stick around, I'd love to see more of you here. Your post clearly shows someone capable of deep thought, humility, and honesty. All great things! I hope you're real, lol.
No offense, it's forum tradition here to doubt new members until they've been here long enough.
Yeah christianity would agree with islam on that one. All three of them are hell-bound. Well maybe not Jolie. I dunno I don't really follow the stars. Maybe she'd get a pass for adopting children.
Looking forward to reading your hubs. Really gotta fly now, but welcome to HubPages! Alot of good people here.
Thanks for the reply. I understand the doubting. I am quite familiar with the Internet Marketing tactics (Being an IM myself). But I like hubpages and I plan on using it for my campaigns, at the same time providing value to the community. I really like the interface for creating a hub. And the forums, seems pretty nice as well. Although, I try to stay away from forums as much as I can. They are very time consuming. Good to know there are like minded people over here. But, this just makes it harder for me to stay away from these forums.
Nice to meet you Pandoras Box, Have a good flight.
Pandora, I'm not sure I want to know what kind of Christianity you were taught, because God does not punish people for honest thinking.
And mevs, not all religions teach that only people of a particular religion will go to Heaven.
Okay, I just realized that this post doesn't belong here. It doesn't go with the topic. You guys are probably gonna bash on me for posting this here.
So, In advance, I apologize. Please consider the fact that I am new here.
Don't sweat it, we go off topic all the time. It's half the fun!
You may want to repost under religions and beliefs, top middle of the screen hit the post new topic button.
Introduce yourself, everyone here is very friendly. (Most of the time.)
By the way, Rod, I wanted to let you know that all the frogs were saved. We usually do save them when we find them alive, there's just a slight difference in methods, but none of us are actually frog killers. My husband will fling them over the fence in the general direction of the pond, my son will pass them over through the boards more gently, which I will sometimes prefer to do as well, but my younger daughter always delivers them safely all the way back to the horse pond in the neighbor's pasture where we expect they come from. Probably best method anyway, since it means they're far less likely to come back!
Nice to know PB. I honestly didn't think you were frog killers.
Sounds like your youngest daughter might become a naturalist or a vet or both some day.
PB you are lovely! Frog love shows so much about who you are!
You may be giving me too much credit, lol. Frog-love may be pushing it.
We do keep african dwarf frogs though. Little fish tank frogs. Though we only have two of them now. They're very cute, but more is better.
I just get a mental pic of your daughter taking them back to their home!
I don't think I give you too much credit, your daughter learned from you didn't she? That is real frog love!
Frogs are wonderful and the people who treat them well are also wonderful.
I agree, caring about our little friends is very important in many ways.
Good for the soul earnestshub good for the soul.
Agreed. I was bought up with a logger father who would stop the bulldozer to move any of our small friends that got in the way.
To this day I do not harm anything I can see with few exceptions.
I know I kill many things every time my foot hits the ground, but do the best I can with anything I can see.
Spiders get moved to a new home, as do any other small insect people in my home.
Essential for my well-being. I do kill mosquitoes though!
Not keen on spiders myself earnestshub but they do have their place.
As for insect catchers I prefer frogs and lizards. I have a pair of blue tongues living under my unit and it is fine with me. My neighbors are also cool with them being there. Since no one bothers them I get the impression they think they're doing a fine job sneaking around. Let them think that way.
I really like blue tongues, although they do get a bit feisty at times!
I have not seen one for a while. Two is luxury!
yeah they're good value but I am careful to leave them alone. They mustn't think humans are too friendly. I trust my neighbors not to hurt them but that's as far as it goes. They're better off being wary of us humans.
There was a time when two nieces of mine thought lizards were yuck. I introduced them to some long tailed friends of mine and two years later they told me they had a resident water dragon in their back yard and the occasional blue tongue visitor and they seemed happy enough to have them around.
You are right earnestshub when you say you can teach kids to have understanding and even compassion for wildlife. If PB has done that will her daughter then great. On the other hand some credit should be given to her daughter for being the kind of person who can learn to care.
Spot on Ron, the child has the goods!
When I lived in Darwin, our salt water swimming pool had a cavity down the side of it.
A huge water monitor lived in there, and used our pool as if he owned it! Beautiful creature, but a bit vicious! It took me 6 months to make friends with him.
Friendships aren't always made over night.
It is amazing how animals come around when you feed them like kings. They are so beautiful to watch, He eventually befrended the kids too. (subject to them treating him like a lord, and constantly giving him fruit from our garden of course!)He was also crazy for steak, fish and the local crickets.
All that is great for your water monitor. The only word of caution here is what is likely to happen if he meets up with some other humans and thinks they will also be friendly?
Animals are amazing. Care has to be taken so they don't get hurt by us or are inadvertently set up to be hurt by someone else.
Kids can be wonderful when they do get the picture and they are our best hope for a future in which we still have amazing animals.
You make a great point. The water monitor seemed to recognise my kids, but shot through like a Bondi tram when others approached him. I agree with you about befriending wild animals, it can cause them to be too trusting. Not this guy though.
you know what? i dont get all of this. Seriously shouldnt you just go through life making sure you dont hurt anyone in any way? isnt that the bottom line to all religeon anyway?
The bottom line for religion for us poor nonbelievers is a one way trip to eternal hellfire.
We don't hurt anyone and we figured that out on our own.
Not hurting people or avoiding doing so is a great thing. in the meantime there are animal, fish, bird, and plant species going extinct because we are so selfish with our use of this planet. What's more, religion has been used too often in the past as a way of rationalizing this selfishness. Being good to other people is really only half the battle won if that.
Those who choose to be (negatively) confrontational with regard to religious beliefs are not secure in their faith. One who is secure in his/her convictions never finds it necessary to be defensive.
T.F. Hodge
Writer/Author/Blogger
http://www.fromwithinirise.com
Is that why they want to send me to hell, because they love me? You don't normally send people you love to burn in agony for an eternity.
Okay folks, it is time for me to make a statement about religious and political forum topics and discussions. It appears that my calls to 'report all offensive behavior' have been misconstrued. Here are my thoughts on these sections of the forum.
1) Discussing your religious or political beliefs with anyone, particularly on the internet, can and eventually will result in an argument. By entering into these discussions in a public forum, especially with trolls or, shall we say, individuals who are exceptionally focused in their beliefs, is only going to cause problems. Name calling, personal threats, etc are strictly prohibited, but someone arguing the merits of your beliefs or opinions does not constitute a personal attack. If you don't like the negative attention your viewpoint receives, don't talk about your personal beliefs in the forums.
2) Flagging someone during a debate is not an effective means of winning an argument. Forum bans can be applied to multiple individuals.
3) Everyone's beliefs are offensive to someone, just for differing with their own world view or spiritual philosophy. This is a fact of life, especially on the internet. Keep this in mind before you hit submit on a forum post in Religious/Political threads.
Remember, these discussions are not for the faint of heart. As always, continue to flag all posts you believe to be in violation to our TOS and we will review them promptly.
Weeks a go I posted a question has anyone been swayed by other's statements in this forum and I got a resounding no. So I really don't see the purpose of it.
I've done a 180 degree turn on a couple of things over the past 10 years, due entirely (or at least initially) to debates I've had on Internet forums. So yes, it can happen. Mind you, it doesn't happen often...
No one has ever really been swayed by simple conversation. i dont think ive ever heard of anyone hear about a religeon and say "your right that makes perfect sense" and then all of a sudden they are buddhist or catholic. People either grow up in a religeon or are scared into one. Or maybe something happens to them like cancer survival and they feel indebted to god or something. All i know is that when a religeous conversation begins, it always turns into a debate. My father in law will swear christians shove christianity in your face, and then he will turn around and have me in a headlock about scientology for an hour, hounding me until he sees some sign that i agree with him. I dont get why it even is a conversation, because i dont think its fair to #1 argue with anyone about what they believe, and #2attack people with frusterating comments like "you must not be secure in your faith."
I remember i gave a bike to my neighbor when i was 8 yrs old. I gave it to her because she didnt have one. No one said thank you, but they did say they would be thanking God in their prayers that night. I didnt do it for a thank you, but i gave her the bike out of my own selflessness. I always saw her on her porch when everyone was riding and thought, i dont need to ride my bike, ive had my turn, you know just simple kid rational.
Then my brother was in chapel with me in school once, and the pastor had chosen people stand up front and my brother was one of them. He unlike me had really started to feel a pull towards the faith and really began to believe. The pastor was touching the foreheads of those people, and they were fainting. When he got to my brother, my brother didnt go down, and the pastor was on him for like 5 minuts, and started really pushing on his head. Finally my brother faked it because he didnt want to embarass the pastor.
These things that ive wittnessed have not made me against christianity, and im not against any religeon. As i have said myself, i think i would be a very self centered person to think they i the info one the one true answer, and that is why i have no concrete belief.
What I have sen has just made me feel like religeon has stopped being a personal beliefe and salvation, and become more of a lifestyle or show. Like peer presure in church, the pressure kids get to raise their hands because everyone else is.
Maybe im rambling, maybe im not making sense. But I just dont understand why we all sit here and debate something that is so personal. If i said i saw a ghost, and you didnt believe in ghosts, you might say all of these things about how they dont exist and try to prove me wrong, but its something i know i saw right? So really everything your saying invalidates me, and just ends up upsetting me and hurting my feelings, and making me feel like maybe im wrong. Why do that to someone? Let them have their faith. Or, let them not have any faith. But Just knowing you believe what you believe, shouldn't that be all you need? Why prove or disprove something to someone else as huge and diverse as religeon? i mean really, unless your the type of person that gets a rise out of upsetting someone or pissing them off. Religeous debates are so agressive. Faith should bring peace in your own heart, not frusteration that someone else dosnt see it your way. All i know is, anyone who thinks they have the authority on any topic is not the person i want to sit next to.
Rod and Earnest, I passed on your praise to my young frog loving daughter, and I appreciate the chance it gave me to reinforce her better traits.
She is somewhat a natural. She is my least well-behaved child, no doubt, and yet she has a deeper, more expressed compassion than the other two.
Its funny how each child is different. This one feels EVERYTHING deeply. Sweet, yes, but don't make her mad!
Fine with me you passed on what we said about her to your daughter. I thought you might but I am glad you told us that you did.
My Family and Other Animals by Gerald Durrell would be a good book to give her when she reaches 13 or 14. Durrell tells about his adventures on the Greek island of Corfu when he was a child. He was the kind of kid whose pockets you had to be careful going through. Anything might pop out of them. He grew up to become a great naturalist, author and zoologist. He ended up running a zoo. My Family and Other Animals starts off when Durrell was 10 and quite a handful. I loved the story when I read it many years ago.
If you don't mind me saying so from your description this daughter of yours sound a lot like YOU PB.
No, hah, thank you, but they're all much better than I, thank goodness! But yeah, she does have a smart mouth and argumentative nature.
If she feels everything deeply then she can easier see the contradictions between what the world says and what it does - of course she would rebel LOL
Definately like you !!! "she does have a smart mouth and argumentative nature."
a smart mouth and an argumentitive nature, sounds good to me
N. Ramius wrote:
Weeks a go I posted a question has anyone been swayed by other's statements in this forum and I got a resounding no. So I really don't see the purpose of it.
======================================
We sometimes learn without even knowing it.
Sometimes I am reluctant to enter the religous forums...afraid I will be bored to death.
I just lost a follower that way! Bored to death and gone. Too much religion can do that!
Not a whole heap o' religion in this religious forum. Let us pray for more...(just kidding).
Yep I can hardly wait for the next pious outpouring!
Hey earnestshub! How are you?
I lost a couple followers actually after I participated in a forum topic relating to religion..It's to bad really. I wasn't aware we were following here based on personality (I mean I know it happens, a lot) but I liked thinking I was fanned based on my talent and it's audience.. anyhoo
Hi Summer thank you for asking. I am very happy and well thank you!
Yeh too bad. I miss em like the plague!
Things too mild and watery maybe? What you need Pylos26 is some thunder and lightning from on high and a burning bush in the wilderness or maybe a singing shrub that happens to be a baritone with a chorus line of femme fatale shrubbery with divine limbs (NEVER legs but LIMBS!).
Oh and pylos26 maybe you should go join the Methodists for hell fire and brimstone preaching. What you need is one of their preacher men who rattles the church, the earth and the universe ever Sunday with his version of the wrath of the all might. How does that sound?
A personal relationship with Jesus Christ...
Tycho Brahe and Jonathan Gabriel have a
personal relationship with Jesus Christ Possible for them because they are fictional characters.
Christians have a religion.
Saw the cartoon The Paul and weird was all I got out of it.
Aside from my finding the idea of Jesus Christ "throwing up the horns" hilarious, it depicts a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. If you can go to Jesus' house and get your ass kicked at Mortal Kombat, you have a personal relationship with him. If you pray and then get a peaceful feeling, you've got a religion.
A very Agnostic Christian sort of attitude. According to the Agnostics you DO have to form a personal relationship with Jesus if you are to be saved. I don't reckon they had Mortal Kombat games in mind because the only computer around in ancient Rome at the time was the abacus and you can't play Mortal Kombat on one of those unless you substitute humans in armor for computer combatants. For a start your abacus doesn't come with a screen. Beads yes but no screen. Of course there could be modern day Agnostic Christians around happy to play a game or two of Mortal Kombat with Jesus.
I thought up a little ditty.
I don't do jesus, or the pope
or climb the top of endless rope
nor do I worship little men
making others victims with their pen
No not for me the fire of hell or christian views of tinkerbell
I'd like to shout it from the roof
How about we stay with thruth?
No scary fairy in the sky just mad beliefs that ever cry
"lets kill them all, they do not love... the scary fairy up above"
I could dig THRUTH. What magic powers does he have? just Joking Earnest.
Nice poem and to the point.
A little bit of instant silliness to lighten the mood.
That's the only con that I see though. People being "afraid" to be slammed, and rightly so as it does get pretty ugly.
The way I see it, people have been burned by religion, by religious fanatics and idiotic people from all sides, and also people want to do their own thing and even justify what they believe in, it is hard to find really great above board discussions about faith and spirituality.
And you have to factor all these in when you consider all the different types of people that you would hope to meet and encounter in any religious forum. And so as they say, if you can't take the heat, get out of those forums quick.
Are we ready to move on to the faith as truth, science knows nothing stage yet?
You know, where the poor ignorant peasants can't see god cos they're all homosexual lovin deviates?
Me too, Earnest! I always love that part. I don't know though, the real hellfire and brimstone crowd seems to have dissipated lately. What happened to Brenda?
I asked earlier on Randy for hellfire and brimstone but it got awfully quiet.
Earnest, I have a new hub titled There Came A Day that might rattle a few cages. Some years ago I was given the challenge of creating a whole short story in one single paragraph. Hence the reason why this story is super short.
I have come to decide that at least here on hubpages, that these so called religious forums are not religious forums at all, since anyone can comment, it usually gets harassed by others who are not religious, then debates ensue.
Therefore it is not a fear of religious forums, it is knowing that they are not in essence a religious forum at all.
It isn't necessarily fear keeping people out, more like boredom or frustration at the repetitivelness of it all.
"There's nothing new under the sun" could be true!
I am an atheist who was a fundamentalist evangelist for four years from 1990 - 1994. I enjoy entering into discussion and even debates with the religious in the forums. I don't think it is harassment as long as each side can keep from personal insults or mocking language. In my opinion a little debate is healthy, I have currently 3 hubs on atheism and I don't censor responses or comments nor do I mind when religious people come to my hubs to try and refute my claims. In the end we either leave a little wiser than when we first arrived or we leave with the same opinions we held when we got there no harm no foul.
I just finished reading your hub "God is a myth" a very well written hub indeed.
People Afraid to Enter the Religious Forums
They might think that being Atheists Skeptics Agnostics they have no brilliant argument to offer to these forums.
There is no point on arguing over religion. No matter what you say, you won't change someone else's mind. Best thing to do is have a sense of humor instead of getting upset. It's only a "personal attack" if you allow it to be.
There is no compulsion to argue; it is just optional.
by Anne Oddity 12 years ago
Not so much a question forum or anything, just a newbie making an observation
by Peter Owen 13 years ago
Why are people posting so many religeous or spiritual questions in a forum for Writers? Is it that some just like to start arguments that cannot be proven either way? Or, the more likely, are some using forums for doing their religeous service instead of going house to house and getting the door...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 11 years ago
The religious forums for the most part are highly contentious and not for the faint of heart and sensitive of disposition. Only those who are strong mentally can and do surivive, even thrive. The rest of us mortals find it BEST to avoid such contention and argument. Name...
by Joe Badtoe 13 years ago
Religious postsThey are drowning this site. The whole my god is better than your god thing has worn me out. The same bigots claiming to be true christians whilst making ignorant remarks about other religions.Then there's the real lunatics who behave as if they're suffering from a kind of biblical...
by Prodio 9 years ago
I ask sincerely. This question spiked my interest after an atheist, who posts regularly on HubPages forums, complained that believers have 'forced' (her/his definition of the word) religion (Christianity basically) on her/him, countless times on these forums.She/he also admits that she/he, however,...
by Oliver Whitham 13 years ago
I have noticed that an increasing number of people seem to have joined this site merely to spam religion on the forum. This would be okay if it was not for the fact that this is a forum for writers, not theists.I am all for having a community forum, but I believe it should be a community forum for...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |