I have a large number of Amazon/product centric hubs. However, I have at least a few dozen that aren't and I can't say that I see a difference in their performance.
Of course if they penalize Amazon centric hubs then I suppose it's a reflection perhaps on my whole subdomain.
It does seem that I've heard that Squidoo (where my traffic continues to flow normally) somehow makes the Amazon modules virtually invisible to Google bots. Don't know if that's true or how it's done...but that might explain the difference.
I have hardly an Amazon capsules at all (if any) due to being in Illinois where you can't be an Amazon affiliate. So I don't think that is it.
I agree. Of all my hubs heavy in Amazon capsules, I have over ten hubs that have gained significantly and steadily, a whole bunch that haven't changed much, and maybe three that have sunk. It's not the Amazon capsules, themselves. It's something else - possibly an association with sales hubs, but not the capsules, themselves.
I am growing very weary of all this stuff - first its one thing, then another
=> Heavy Amazon capsules
=> keyword stuffing, over optimization
=> related hubs that are not related
=> poor quality hubs (whatever that means)
=> low authority for your subdomains
=> stolen pages outranking the original
+++ all the Google stuff about Panda's food preferences.
When are we going to get precise, clear advice.
Surely this is in HP's interest.
We need quality advice - no more rumors please.
Editing and modifications takes (wastes) a lot of time. HELP NEEDED!
This is scary - very scary!
I have being experimenting with setting up my own Articles website.
=> You can copy a Hub simply by swiping it from top to bottom with your mouse and pasting it word for word, photo by photo, caption by caption, everything!!! into that website as HTML. It is a direct transfer simply by copying and pasting.
=> After opening the test site up for submissions I was swamped with 100-300 article submissions every day - all good articles that were either full or partial copies, or material had been poorly rewritten by spinners - all delivered by some bot. I had to shut down the submissions when they reached 2000 in ten days!!! The copies get duplicated and spread magnifying the damage.
Your finely crafted articles can be copied and Google does not appear to be able to protect the original (the copy can outrank the original and the original author many be penalised!). This to me is the most damaging concern I have as it trashes all yout hard work.
Something has to be done to stop copying at the source - Flagging with Google etc. is too time consuming and is a lost cause because unless copying is blocked it will keeping occurring. The Best articles are the Most attractive. The irony is that HP spends major resources on preventing copied material being posted on HP (software and manual referrals etc.), but does nothing to stop HP articles from being copied and destroying page ranks and hit counts of the authors, which loses revenue for HP and the authors - good writers have left. STOP THE COPYING! INSTALL COPYING BLOCKS! Please!!!!!
The plunge down can't get further than this.. I thought things were changing..though page ranks are back and some hubs are back in their rightful place on Google searches.. the traffic seems to be static (almost non existent from Google and that is where all my traffic came from).I just can't seem to understand what is happening..
Yes, mine can't get much worse either. A couple of my hubs are back up in the SERPS, but that's the extent of it. My traffic is just gone, has been since 8/10/11. Little (and I emphasize little) peaks, but that's about it. Thank goodness I set up my own sites after Panda, since they're still making money. They're affiliate sites, too.
I really want to be patient with HP, I do. But, I'm feeling more and more discouraged everyday at this point.
I'm so sorry to everyone else who's experiencing this hideous crash. It's so frustrating and you just feel so powerless.
I am glad that you had the sense to do what you did.. boy is it frustrating????
I know... it's just maddening at this point. I have no idea why I continue to look at my stats, either. I want to scream every time I do. I just keep hoping it will get better.
Traffics ok, considering I still need to work on my substandard hub,but NO clicks...
I saw this video a few days ago and found it very interesting and helpful. It is very recent, 8-3-11. It's the Google search team discussing how search works and thoughts about the future. It's over an hour long, but worth watching. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlAydU6vBZo (fast forward to 5:43 to get to Danny Sullivan intro)
@thejeffriestube, take a look at this video that rebekahELLE posted in this thread recently...It's well worth the time. Along with what I think is your right thought about not knocking yourself out trying to figure out what a search engine is doing, this "guiding principle" from Google is really what it's about: "Do what's best for the user."
Subdomain shift made very impressive and positive change for me. traggic increased from 150 to 250 per day! as it is before panda.
Spell mistake! it's "traffic!" Hubpages removed the option of editing comments? it's important! :-P :-D
Somehow, traggic almost felt just right to me.
mymagicview: you have never been able to edit comments in forums. There have been times that this bad typist has cringed at the fact that editing is not an option.
Editing is an option for a certain period of time. See the More button under your comment? It contains an edit feature.
edit: I used it. It works.
Thanks! I just never knew about these changes :-)
Edit: Thanks again! ;-)
Thanks for telling me. I've never tried that button. I thought it was for more options, not more text.
The weekend adds to the misery.. LOL .. grin and bear or panda bear
If there is still no sign that Hubpages has any idea what happened by the end of the week, I think I will throw in the towel. 10c a day isn't even worth the time it takes to fix broken links.
Well HP wrote me back saying there does not seem to be a specific reason for my decrease in page views.. and then referred me to the learning center. "Sigh" I give up!
as a fellow Plunger, I sympathize. I hope they are still analyzing. Things we know: some folks got hit by a similar percentage drop (~75%) on the same day. Not everyone was affected.
There is a pattern...we just need to figure out what that is. I am crossing my fingers that HP is close to an answer.
We are still working on it. Its looking like an algorithm tweak by google. It appears to be largely content related and the type of query traffic someone is targeting - commerce driven.
I'm working on a hub with more details and analysis, and I am Working with a few authors around testing various changes to their content to see how it responds. It will take several weeks to run these tests, but my hope is we will be able to identify things for people to do. I'll also publish some of the tests we are doing so you can run them yourself if you like.
thanks Paul. I will be more than happy to volunteer to help. Let me know if you could use another account to work with.
I am really glad to hear that you are working on it. So, don't you think this thing will return to normal in time? If you need an extra account to work with, I am willing to help. Also, maybe it isn't for one particular reason our traffic has dropeed, maybe there are many reasons.
Thank you Paul for letting us know you are working on something. Please keep us posted so we won't feel like there is no hope!
Have you watched that vid rebekahELLE published in this forum? The clear message from Google is that there's no second-guessing Google's algos. To do that would be gaming.
I know HP wants to get this site back to the prominence it enjoyed pre-Panda. Whatever HP is doing, I support that. But, I think, there's no getting around Google. And that means, one, offering the best experience for the user; two, a credible site that isn't trying to figure out Google, but a site that is trying to figure out the user.
Unfortunately, there is still a huge amount of crap that gets published on HP every day. I do my part in flagging this crap, when I have the time. If you paid me for it, I'd be more vigilant. But you still don't have a first-line filter for garbage.
Anyway, what's happening with me with the subdomain switch? It's all crap. A rise over the last two weeks, and then a plummet. Panda runs in cycles, I've heard, and it's busy weeding out information that does not meet searchers' expectations. Sadly, HP seems to be in the muck of this.
Why has HP not initiated standards for accepting articles? All Hubs should go through a review process until the writer proves ability.
If you want to keep this a free-form publishing platform, then turn it into something else that doesn't promise monetary rewards for publishing here. Or, get with the program and impose standards for publishing.
Why flag hubs? If our sub-domains truly represent the individual writer, why should we police the work of others? Wasn't this the excuse for converting to the sub-domains, to allow each writer's work to stand alone?
Apparently it worked as my views fell from the highest to almost the lowest in a matter of hours. Sorry to have cluttered up the place so much for you non-plungers.
You make a good point. But yet, our subdomains are still associated with HP, as blogs on blogspot are associated with Google. There's got to be a ripple-down effect. And therefore, still the need to clean up HP. I guess. Sort of. Hell, what do I know? Except that post-subdomain switch on HP, despite what I said yesterday, now my traffic is tanking, again. It may be "my" domain, but it still rides on the coattails of HP.
No, I'm not wasting any more time cleaning up a mess which caused the first penalties here on HP. While many of us always tried to stay withing the rules set for us here, others were allowed to post misleading, spammy hubs which we all were punished for by Google.
Even after these embarrassing articles were pointed out to staff they seemed reluctant to remove them from the site. Of course coincidentally, these same hubs were pulling in millions of views and therefore money for HP. Hmmmm, is there a connection there? I think there is!
So, if HP wants to continue to allow crap on this site, they can clean it up themselves. Nothing personal, just business.
That's exactly my concern, Sally. In fact our sub-domains are associated far more closely with HP than blogspot blogs are with Blogger.
On Blogger, each blog is totally isolated from the rest. You can even choose not to display the Blogger bar with its "next blog" button.
However, our HP sub-domains are constantly contaminated because every page on our sub-domain displays a sidebar full of Hubs from other sub-domains, often unrelated or irrelevant.
I can see how the related Hubs feature would be of great benefit to all of us if the site managed to fix the quality problem, and found a way to ensure the "related" Hubs are truly related. However right now, I can't help worrying they do more harm than good.
If you are noticing a shift on brand names, that is because Panda helped highlight brands as a factor, something that was done more mildly earlier in the year.
Hubs that focus on a specific product
Ie
The Hub.
Coffee Mate 2 Cup Instant Coffee Maker
Will now find it much harder to compete against teh official brand.
However a hub like
Top 10 2 cup instant coffee makers, or best, latest, fastest, etc will still be able to compete for those search terms which are brandless quite easily.
Just a point in note here, I lost traffic on my main traffic hubs after I REDUCED the number of amazon capsules.
Likewise I run quite a few sites now which are doing increasingly well post panda that are amazon capsule heavy.
If Amazon capsules are removed then I hate to say it but it will be time for me to remove nearly ever profit making hub on my account to another locaton.
I haven't seen any decrease since sub-domains went into effect. I think it must be frustrating trying to figure out what the issue may be if online writing is your income, but I don't think I would delete hubs. I think those who can best answer the questions are the guys from Google themselves. I posted a video earlier that is a conference including the 3 major search 'gods', (Inside Google's Search Office) and I found it insightful and helpful. It's an actual discussion about how search works from 8-3-11. This is the link from the Google channel. http://www.youtube.com/user/Google#p/u/5/pt6qj5-5kVA
Thank you rebekahELLE for posting this video link, I've watched some of it and will return to see the rest later. I am learning from watching it and trying to relate it to how best to use the information they are giving out in it. I must say before seeing this, I never knew how frequently they changed the way that the searches worked or that they tested them so much before launching them.
What is happening for me here? - Traffic is up since sub-domain change but not to pre first panda.
I listened to it again this morning while doing other online stuff and heard things I missed from the first listen. I think they give a number of tips and discuss valuable information and help to keep the focus on, 'what is best for the user?' What does the user want to find in search results.
Their overall expertise in their profession is very admirable. The discussion has vision and effective management/leadership tools also.
2uesday, glad to hear your traffic is up.
Thank you, rebekahELLE. I just sat through the whole thing without even getting up for more coffee. (Haven't found anything that entertaining/enlightening for quite awhile.) It was just kind of nice to see to see some of those issues addressed by Google people themselves.
TY very much for posting this link. I now have six pages of notes from all I heard and saw on this video.
I take some of this information with a grain of salt: after all, Google must protect its interests and, while its chief engineers are skilled in talking the talk, we folks out here will never really see them walking the walk (unless some of you work for Google and get to see this from the inside).
Surely, much of this video is masked to not reveal the truth of what Google is doing, but nonetheless, it does give an insight into Google's mindset, something we need to pay attention to if we want our stuff to show up on Google searches. It is true that Google bestows authority, whether we like it or not.
Having been around corporate posturing for a long time, it's clear that some of the games that are going on in the video...dodging questions, deflecting answers to promote a corporate stance...are all there; however, one thing, one person, stands above the rest. And he is Amit.
This man has a vision not limited by his discipline. In fact, his discipline comes about because of his vision, I think. He reminds me of some special friends I have who analyze the world around them from a logical, scientific perspective, but never lose their humanistic and creative viewpoints. They are also accomplished musicians and artists who integrate their studies of science with compassion for the aspects of life they can't quantify.
Well, enough about that. TY for putting this link in this forum.
To the Ancient Egyptians, Ammit was the eater of souls. If the dead person's heart was not balanced by the feather of Maat in the judgement hall of Osiris, the person would be cast into the abyss to be eaten by Ammit and thus lose the hope of resurrection.
How appropriate!
Amazing. What a ripe field of interpretation. We'll not even talk about the difference in spelling.
And I'm not following you? Why? Soon to be fixed.
I still have high traffic, back to Pre-Panda and more. I do keyword my hubs but try to keep good writing, I don't have a clue why others are suffering!
My traffic is almost dead, after the 1st day of the subdomain switch it went up 100%, for a couple of days it stayed up, I was so happy. Now except for one or two hubs which appear to be circling around face book, my traffic is dead, from 50 Google views a day it went down to 1-2. Traffic from other search engines decreased too. I even stopped looking at my stats
And mine as well. I'm not looking at stats for now.
I have confidence that HP will sort it out! (See Paul E's latest comment). It may well take them weeks rather than days though.
Ah Well!
Back to the Cargo Cult
Keeping those drums beating!
Since the new subdomain switch, my traffic has increased to prePanda levels and more. Today, my traffic is equal to prePanda weekdays, and I know the weekend traffic is generally lower.
I have very few Amazon heavy hubs and have cut back on the Amazon ads that I feature.
My faith in HP has revived, but am not happy with all the copied hubs. Have spent way too much time filling out DMCA's due to way too many copied hubs. I'm starting to feel like a pest, but am sick of seeing so much of my work stolen.
That is how mine went.. a 100% increase before it plunged to the lowest ever forget panda.. it is similar to when I started out here .. I will give it a couple of weeks to see if HP can even figure out what is up.. weeks.. ??????
Paul E needs to getting working faster than that..
That's sometimes the downfall of having 100 hubber score and being in the top 20. There are so many lazy, unscrupulous people trying to make $ online.
Ha, ha, I am lowering my score by being lazy on here, thinking the same thing myself.
exactly.
Everyone has their own sub-domain now, so what's on our pages?
Google can't give detailed answers as every site has so many variables, as is the same here at HP.
The examples Paul gave previously hit on a couple things; over optimization, duplicate content in the RSS feeds. If I was a hubber with a lot of RSS feeds across my hubs, and had taken a huge traffic hit, I would get rid of them, or at the very least, edit them and remove the auto description. What will it hurt to remove them or hide them, and see what happens?
I'm glad you found the video helpful. That 'searchless' search vision at the end sounds crazy amazing. [I would have liked to have heard more from Ben Gomes.] We all write differently, and for various reasons, but we all want our hubs to be found, and to be successful.
I think Ben isn't their star speaker. I think he lacks vision (only from what I saw on the vid), but it may be he has vision but needs a different venue. I keep in mind that this vid was to promote Google first, offer helpful information second. This vid could have done without Ben, for what it was.
And yeah, I loved the candy store metaphor at the end, but the five-year plan was sorely missing.
Actually Gomes is their lead features engineer. He has been instrumental with many key Google developments. I think it is more an informational video in light of so much recent Google news.
anyway, those guy are brilliant in what they do.
off to enjoy hot dogs, chips and brew! Enjoy the weekend.
I just read an excellent article from RyanKett, on all why your traffic may be falling. Highly recommend this especially if you write sales hubs.
For me it was a light bulb on understanding (finally after months ago everyone talking about it) why the RSS feeds are not needed.
The added bonus of reading Amazon capsules are NOT to blame for your falling traffic is that it is a fresh breathe of air to finally see some impressive stats from someone and to actually read something positive.
I read this article this morning and followed every bit of ryankett's advice...it all makes a lot of sense to me. Now it's wait and see time.
I have just read Ryankett's hub and yes it makes total sense in a non sensical situation! Well done Ryan!
just spent the past several hours deleting all of my RSS feeds. I think the theory has merit - and I have almost no views, so there was very little to lose. Now to cross my fingers and wait.
At this point trying almost anything has little to lose. Something stuck in my head I heard a few days ago; basically, stop trying to figure Google out. Still do basic SEO, but don't try and figure out what the engine wants to see. That changed my mindset a bit.
I agree with you and Mutiny92 about there not being much to lose. The memorable title, "Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up To Me" comes to mind.
Wow, that was enlightening. Yeah, I think I'm done figuring it all out. I'm just going to write good Hubs, do a little SEO, and see what they do. I'm focused on writing stuff people might want to read.
So pleased now that I deleted my RSS feeds ages ago. I only ever used them to link to my own 'Latest' stuff or for Hubmob hubs, so I deleted all the RSS feeds to my own stuff when Hubpages made it a new 'rule'. I think most if not all my Hubmob RSS feeds have long gone too, (in many cases I removed the hubs and republished them elsewhere). Ironically, as you know, my traffic is up right now, and has been for some time, so maybe this is because of a lack of RSS feeds on my Hubs.
There's a lot to be said about your actions...you've been around for a long while and you know what you are doing.
Once could argue whether HP should even offer RSS and News feed capsules, but this place is still in the toddler stage, given where the Net is and where it could go.
Since we are now our own subdomains, maybe it's time to treat our HP portfolio as if it were its own website, relying on ourselves and not on any perceived SEO advantage HP might have lent in the past.
Thanks Sally, although I suspect it was more good luck than good judgement on my part that kept my traffic up. You too have been here a long time, and also must know what you are doing.
I am going to keep on working on sites of my own right now, as I firmly believe this is the way to go if we are to make money for ourselves in the long term. After all, why share revenue if we don't need to?
I had already made an effort to delete the RSS capsule before the "plunge" like Misty. Apparently, it had no bearing on the penalty some of us are being unfairly subjected to by the Google gods.
Yes, excellent point. I've been thinking the same thing.
All my blogs are sub-domains of my main website - purely because it saves me money on hosting. Google treats them all as totally separate. Blogspot blogs are sub-domains of Blogger.com. Google treats them all as totally separate. The same goes for sub-domains on Wordpress.com, Weebly and all the other free blogging platforms. Each sub-domain is its own little island.
So based on that logic, it only makes sense to look on our sub-domain as its own website or blog, and take decisions accordingly.
I'm not so sanguine about deleting all my RSS feeds. I had a feed on each hub, pointing to my "latest" hubs, purely as an SEO effort but deleted them when HP made their recommendation to do so. I still have a feed left on every hub pointing to "hot" hubs in the same group, however. My thinking was to guide visitors to similar topics that I've written about.
HP stats reports that nearly 20% of my traffic is coming from within my own subdomain, and google analytics shows that I have a goodly number of visitors that hit at least 3 hubs before leaving. Although I use in-text links as well as feeds I suspect that many of these "hub hopping" visitors are using the RSS feed links to hop around my subdomain.
I have read Ryan's latest hub on amazon capsules where he blasts RSS feeds as duplicate content and I fully agree with him. Although I have not seen the huge decrease in traffic that some of our better hubbers have I am fully aware that I may be next in line to do so and a possible cause would be the RSS feeds I use. There is some reason these hubbers have been hit and poor quality isn't it.
If I'm right about hub-hopping visitors, though, I could immediately lose 20% of my traffic if I delete the RSS capsules. What to do? What to do?
Any thoughts on the dilemma?
I am not 'sanguine' about this though, it is purely coincidental, not a deliberate act that I did in order to attain a result. HP told us RSS feeds to our own latest hubs was not allowed, so I deleted those feeds and then later deleted feeds that were related to Hubmob topics. I can't explain it, but my traffic is up, and that is a fact. Not quite at Pre-Panda levels right now, but better than before subdomains came in by a couple of hundred views per day. Very odd but no explanations here I am afraid.
Too many of us had nearly identical experiences upon moving to subdomains - a small decrease in traffic followed by a huge increase to near pre-panda levels to think it is coincidence.
Deletion of "latest" RSS feeds probably occurred too long ago to be a part of that increase, but I suppose it is possible.
The big question, of course, is why some have seen an over night destruction of their traffic, and remaining RSS feeds may be a part of the reason for that.
I do the same thing on all my dance-related Hubs. I haven't had a problem and Ryan reckons that's because I don't have them on all Hubs. It's a ratio thing.
You'll note he says the problem is the description, not the links themselves - do you use the descriptions?
What is the advantage of using RSS over putting in links to relevant hubs? I have never really understood RSS, except in one hub where I use it to show updated weather information (I think it's RSS, but am not sure because I do not really understand what RSS means).
I use the "hot" designation, which seems to me to give me a better chance of getting a visitor to go on to another hub. If a hub is very popular it is more likely to interest the random visitor, or so I reason.
I could, of course, use a link capsule, but lose the ease of changing it as new hubs become more popular. I also think a RSS capsule (or a link capsule) produces links that are more visible than in text links.
Yes I do, and you are right that the answer may be to minimize the descriptions. As far as I can see you can't eliminate them completely?
I took Ryans comment about ratios to mean the amount of duplicate material (in that description) compared to the number of words in the hub, not the ratio of hubs with and without RSS feeds. We see this same kind of thing even through HPs definition of a duplicate hub and I assume Google does the same thing.
I may have to re-think if your interpretation is correct.
This is what Ryan told me:
"@Marisa - Google uses ratios, and ... your ratio would be minute compared with those who have a full sized RSS feed on every single hub ...
Your duplicate content ratio would be calculated across your subdomain, and you have a lot of hubs, so easy to see why you weren't really affected "
Hmmm. Sounds like he thinks it is a combination of both and he could very well be right.
Maybe I'll just put the smallest description I can on each RSS feed link and hope for the best.
I only allow 4 links per hub instead of the max of eight and minimizing the descriptions in conjunction with that might do the job.
I really hate to give up those feeds.
I have just gone over mine and reduced the feeds to quote the first sentence only, and removed instances of multiple feeds.
Nearly all of my hub are interlinked through rss feeds on similar topics. I am reluctant to remove all those feeds as I think they enhance visitor experience, assuming they found one of my hubs through the search engines. If that hub doesn't answer their question, another one (of mine) might.
But if it is the duplicate content issue that is upsetting Google, then my reasoning is that by reducing the amount of duplicate content to a single sentence for each hub in the feed should reduce that duplication to a respectable level. I hope.
Izzy, I went cold turkey on mine. All RSS feeds were eliminated from my account. I will be curious to see how your approach turns out. Keep in touch.
Izzy, I have RSS feeds to related Hubs on all my dance Hubs, but they've always been first sentence only. My traffic is still holding.
Hi Marisa,
So does that mean I can go on Blogger for free and make separate blogs for different topics, or just one? I'm trying to decide if I want to make one Metaphysical Blog, since most of my stuff goes back to that subjects. But i've been writing book reviews too, so thought maybe I'd move them first. Can I make them separate and will it still be free? I read the info, but have trouble understanding. I know it's just a new learning curve. Thanks. Jean
I have three totally separate Blogger blogs. One is about life in my part of Wales, one is promoting my WriteAngled articles, and the third is in Esperanto. I've not come across any problems or been asked for payment for any of them.
Jean, you can have an awful lot of Blogger blogs, all free. (I have "a zillion", all in varying stages of development, just for the kind of separating of subjects that you have in mind. They're not even functioning the way blogs should be, but I had to first have a place to start writing (and sending subject-related writing); because I wanted them to have substance before "taking them to next level". I have a "central one" that's kind of a weird little dumping ground for miscellany, and that's one around which any others centered (while remaining completely separate).
It's not how "everyone" does things, so I'm not recommending that particular approach (or should I say non-method/non-approach..) (I do my own kind of thing, so Marissa can give you better tips when she shows up again. ) I just thought I'd let you know you can have lots of blogs, do what you want (within reason) with them, and not be charged (at least for now).
I'd get rid of them, but they've been around long enough that they've started to pick up some "spare change" and a little traffic here and there. I may still get rid of them, but I think instead I'll most likely create a whole new "packaging" (more professional) of my writing and intentionally bury them away from the "forefront" . If they show up in searches, great. Otherwise, they won't have the visibility they now have, because as it is right now, the whole bunch of them is just a "big, weird, deal". Every so often I've put them all on "private", but I don't like the drop in earnings when I do. I just figure, "perfect them, build on them, and the 'bury' them so they don't embarrass me any longer."
I just thought, since you said you're not all that familiar with it, I'd give you some examples of what you shouldn't do (
) or else what you might want to do (only better and more completely than I've done with my half-baked approach).
(I spread my spare time too thin, so I have a real mess on my hands now as far as having a bunch of "weirdness", in terms of online writing, goes.) My real point here is that there's a lot of flexibility with what you do, and Google doesn't seem to particularly care if you started a blog in 2007 and it's still only in "beginning stages" in today.
(As they say, Rome wasn't built in day.
)
Besides the ones I have up, I have a couple that are better but not yet public; and I've deleted a couple that I really hated (trying to trim the number without losing the ones with potential).
Yes, you can make as many Blogger blogs as you like, and it's always free.
Bear in mind that a blog is a collection of blog posts, and you need to keep building it over time. So if you're going to start one, you need to feel confident you have plenty of material to share.
Another alternative is Weebly. I don't usually recommend free websites, but Weebly is the exception and I know a few people who are very happy there. It's probably one of the easiest to get a handle on, great for non-technical people!
The advantage of a website is that unlike a blog, you can create the whole thing upfront using your existing material, and (although you'll probably improve and revise it over time), there's no absolute need to keep adding to it.
Whether you go for a blog or a website, you do need to specialise. A website/blog that focusses on just one topic will do far better than a generalised one.
this is a fun thread to follow .... if you read it in entirety, you can almost see everyone scrambling to react to every crumb of a suggestion. I haven't read many good ones in here yet myself. at least no blanket one size fits all suggestions (because there isn't any)
good to see Ryan took the time to point out the amazon theories were hogwash. that was nice of him.
if one was to look back at threads from right after panda hit and many of the more industry knowledgeable users were actively theorizing in the forums .... one could find this whole scenario predicted and explained.
the move to subdomains was suggested within minutes of the first panda debates
this would be followed by a potential drop in traffic as content was reindexed
to be followed by a boost in traffic for a fresh content bonus
then the commercial and "pro" rubbers would be fine except for the hamstringing on amazon capsules and various witch hunts that drove them away ... they would have been the anchor stores that was holding hubpages high.... but the casual hubbers would plummet once untethered
... lots of comments about "over optimization" ha! that's apsinine ... to be over optimized you have have some optimization and see agenda in place to begin with.
if you had a big loss of traffic after the honeymoon period ...its not rss feeds, aff links or am caps...you just got a reality check on publishing online. hp has little to no authority. when google checks your hubs to see if "people like them" .. how many links will g find to your hubs and subdomain from outside sources? do you have basic on page factors defined as a se Requires to properly categorize?
prob not ... you have to start at the beginning and look at your sub from a comprehensive view not jump for every magic bean that spills your way
sorry about typos.. on phone ..damn thing kept changing hubber to rubber and I can't handle correcting anymore of them
For lack of a better alternative, I deleted my RSS and will go in to clean up the worst performing of my hubs.
I will take any crumb of a suggestion I can at this point.
Hey, my name is entering the language in a new and wonderful way.
Anyway, just to say I will follow my own hunches.
I will point out one thing:Panda 1 was only supposed to impact a small percentage of searches- around 12% if I remember correctly.
What kinds of searches are hit? I reckon commercial stuff is more likely than recipes or how to build a bird table. And certainly the kinds of keyword phrases you mine from Adwords have to be more probable Panda targets than queries like where do I get a drink in Rotherhithe (or Brooklyn etc) without getting mugged?
If Panda is aimed disproportionately at commercial keywords, it might help explain why my 40, purely commercial, Amazon orientated hubs got hit and the hundred or so similar pages on my main sub domain- which includes a lot of non-commercial hubs are doing well.
If it is not commercial keywords that are the problem but any very specifically keyword targeted pages this will include all Amazon hubs created by dedicated content farmers who know how to hunt out a 'good' keyword.
All in all, over optimization has to be a suspect.
Of course, this might not be the answer but then nothing in your post rings true for me. Also, I never used RSS feeds so that is not the answer for me either.
If the problem is the end of the honeymoon that suggests to me that subdomains may not be such a brilliant idea after all. I am not doing any of the "naughty" things that have been suggested (feeds, links, keyword stuffing) and still got plunged. What's the best that most people will take the same dip as domains roll out?
And you don't appear to have much Amazon stuff either. So I personally think that demonising Amazon, as some people seem to be doing, isn't the answer. I don't think we have anything like enough information to guess "the answer" and I doubt if HP has a big enough "sample" of affected accounts to change that situation.
In general, I do sometimes wonder if some people look for over-simple solutions when it comes to adapting their hubs to alterations to the Google algorithm. As I understand it, the algorithm weighs up an aggregate of factors, often comparing them relatively with each other. Of course, removing an individual element that has a negative bearing might help a page, but the problem may be a combination of elements, or how different elements relate to each other.
In short, it may well be that it is a combination of things, rather than one thing that is causing the traffic drop and that is why the anecdotal data given by other hubbers can appear confusing.
That is the point- we are all dealing with anecdotal evidence.
Hubpages say they are looking into this stuff and they should have enough data to come up with a reliable answer. It's worth waiting to see before moving any pages.
Another suspicion in my mind is that the content in Amazon capsules is all essentially duplicate content- some capsules can contain twenty or thirty words. Maybe if you have enough Amazon capsules in your sub-domain relative to other content that is enough duplicate content to trigger a slap. Especially, if you have had plenty of stuff scraped.
Last night I went ahead and removed the Amazon and EBay capsules from my (previously)best performing hub. I also deleted the perhaps superfluous links to my other hubs, but added in another good quality link to a useful reference site.. When I went to bed my hub was at the top of page 2 on Google UK. Today it's on page 4! I know this is my hub, so I'm a tad biased, but I'm astonished that it has slid down so far, when the sites listed above it fit the search criteria so poorly.
I agree. If you look at the likely development of the algorithm over - how long - ten years - it has probably advanced a lot. Whereas they started with a list, then added in back linking and keywords - I believe they are trying to make the results more human.
As in. Would a human like this? Is it full of repetitive keywords, bold text, copied content, overused tricks like tags and backlinks, has someone written it with gaming the system in mind... and so on.
Let's assume Google know all the tricks. The final 'vote' if you like is how long does someone stay on the page, and do they look at your other stuff.
Just as spammy crap brought down HubPages, so it will bring down your own domain. I should point out that I get virtually no traffic at all, have no idea what I am doing and am about as far away from a passive income as you can imagine.
The fact is that Google doesn't know all the tricks, otherwise the top of the SERPs for any particular keyword(s) would consist entirely of original, high-quality and useful content.
We should all know by now that this is not the case - for some subjects at least, the top of the SERPs is full of stuff that is either plagiarised or just not that good (if not downright cr*p).
Put it this way: either Google's "trick knowledge" is deficient, or all these algorithm changes have had a different purpose to the one that is publicly stated by Google themselves and by its propagandists, for want of a better word.
I believe Google are planning something like 500 changes / tweaks this year. Can we assume it is in their interest to promote content that please the searchers - otherwise search is dead and people will retreat inside Facebook.
That's more or less what I base my opinion on. They are trying to improve. But ten years of spammers plus a new mountain of crap every day must be somewhat hard to deal with.
This is hard to say, because I want lots of traffic and preferred HP results pre Panda - but I don't think my searches these days are worse than they were.
In fact, I think the search experience has improved a little.
I went searching today for my own hubs, and was shocked to learn that nearly every single one has been plagiarised, and all the copies are way ahead of my originals in the search engines.
My writing can't be that bad or else so much page 1 stuff that I have written wouldn't be there! Such a pity I am not getting the credit for them.
I started off filing DMCAs then realised the task is overwhelming, an impossible mountain to climb. Just a few days ago I got a Chinese site to take my content off, and the next day yet another Chinese site copied it.
Someone has started a new site with nothing but content stolen from me, and with no contact us page.
Loads of blogsites have my articles reproduced without permission.
Several educational sites have stolen my content too.
I give up.
I'm so sorry Izzy. That is totally unfair. My comments seem rather inflammatory now - they weren't meant to be.
Izzy, I can really feel your pain, you have worked so hard to produce high quality work, I dont know what to say to encourage you, only to think of what you have achieved and what you can achieve
Izzy, it IS discouraging, and I got to where I said "I give up" too. On a brighter note, though, over the time since I first made some "massive" discoveries (and couldn't even begin to imagine the work it would take to see what I hadn't yet discovered), some of those "situations" as the one you mentioned have apparently been righted by Google (at least for now). I've seen seen pages (and sometimes pages) of my stolen stuff still published in some weird publication somewhere, and I've seen whole "secret-identity" blogs, that have stolen/scraped my stuff; but with some of it, a person would actually have to search the x lines of text before ever finding it; so that's all I can care about.
In reality, I haven't really "given up", but I'm doing things a whole lot differently now. This is one reason I jumped on the Google's authorship thing right away. That won't take care of some stuff, but I do think (especially as time goes on) that it will act as substantial deterrent in a number of different ways. (Honestly.. I got so where I didn't want my stuff to end up on the first search page! ). I got through my own particularly big "I-give-it-up" phase, but I did learn from it; and I keep figuring out ways to safeguard against at least some of the crap.) (I once thought that aiming to write the kind of stuff "nobody would want to steal" was one way to minimize that crap. They'll steal ANYTHING!
) Anyway, don't get too discouraged. Necessity is the mother of invention.
In any case, anyone who has discovered how impossible it can seem/be to find what may be - like - 80% of their own stolen stuff discovers that it can get so bad we can't even get our heads around it. (Maybe THAT would explain some of the drops in traffic for people who have excellent Hubs. Maybe, it took a few weeks into the subdomain switch before people figured out ways to take advantage of something that could (I don't know if it does) actually be facilitating some types of theft.)
It's not impossible, you'll get there! Grit your teeth and if they have Adsense, file the DMCA direct with Google - that way you'll have the satisfaction that the b@st@rds could lose their Adsense account. If you sit down and bash them out, it could take you a solid couple of days to get them all issued, but that's worth it, isn't it?
I am so proud of you Mark.
... And a little disappointed too, for not lightening and brightening this cold mine?! , with your ever uplifting way of looking at things on the lighter side.
Warm Regards
OK. I wish I hadn't said anything. I thought I had stumbled on the meaning of life for a moment.
Here, try this.
My traffics awful.
Thought I'd share my present experience since changing to subdomains.
I too saw a drop in traffic right away after switching, then my traffic started increasing, back to Pre-Panda days. The interesting thing is that most of my traffic is coming from a couple hubs that had done well before Pre-Panda but had also got hit, in fact one of them now has triple the traffic at about 500 views per day and ranks on page 1 of Google (the symptoms of a concussion) and my my dog skunk smell hub returned to good views a little higher than it originally had Pre-Panda (about 150 views per day) So with all my hubs I am getting about 1,500 views a day, most of them from Google so that's a great thing. My HP earning have been better, running about $120 a month (will be more this month) and my adsense is still lower but I am thinking that's because the HP program is running. So my next move will be to probably take off HP ads and monitor that for perhaps a month. Just testing the waters here to what happens. Between HP ads and Google I am almost back to Pre-Panda earnings. I just want to see what happens when I take the HP ads program off and see what happens with my adsense earning alone.
How far south are your earnings may I ask? You have a large amount of hubs.
On the plus side I just had a visit from the UK. 1 hit in 24 hours. Feeling a bit smug.
I would love to know the origin of the phrase "heading south"
I live in south of some place, and I ain't doing bad.
Thought I'd weigh in on the subdomain switch.
Dorsi? I'm glad to read that you're getting good results with the recent changes by Google.
My daily reads are back to pre-Panda levels, and going higher. I'm averaging 2,000 reads/day, with occasional spikes to the 2,500 range. Yesterday was my best day ever, with 3,355 reads.
It's clear from reading these posts that many writers on Hubpages are feeling frustrated about their experiences. I hope that things improve for everyone.
I don't know the origin but it seems to mean that things are headed for the worst, since south is an to acronym for downwards, like on the maps. The ancient Greeks actually considered south as being UP as the sun was their primary point. Facing the equator, south was UP and north was DOWN.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when I hear the term duplicate content, I relate it to the same stuff written in a zillion articles across the web. The articles written about products, etc. -- do they say the same thing as everybody else who is trying to rank on that keyword or sell that product? In my understanding, that is not unique content, it's duplicate.
I don't write sales hubs, so I'm no expert, but that's simply my own understanding. Does a sales hub say anything different than the zillion that are already out there? In Ryan's case, he personalized it and made it unique.
Actually not, not in my case, I try to add little bits of my own, put my own stamp on things - even Sexy Cat has a load of almost related stuff on it about becoming the cat woman who feeds to the local cats and other such rubbish.
Unfortunately it is no longer unique as half the web it seems have copied big chunks of that hub.
I'm not sure if I should continue to struggle or not. I've eliminated the auto generated duplicate content on my hubs which occurs in my link modules.
Now I'm going back too and recategorizing my hubs, making sure they are organized appropriately. But now I wonder, with the subdomain thing, if my topics aren't too diverse. If I had a website I was trying to push high in searches I would be much more focused.
When we were all part of the same thing (not our own subdomains, my hubs all had plenty of company, plenty of related content. Now some of them sit there with just 3 or 4 other hubs within my subdomain sharing the same category of info. Certainly doesn't lend itself to any kind of authority.
My hubs aren't necessarily junk that I want to get rid of, but they aren't all closely related. Now....what to do about that????
My thoughts exactly. You are still getting some boost because you're linked via HubPages categories, but you're right: each of my websites is very focussed on one topic, that's what everyone says you should do.
I would be willing to break it all up into several accounts/subdomains, but I'm not sure if it would be effective so I don't really want to spend the time doing it.
The other dilemma is that your existing Hubs have age (or at least the original Hub does, and that's 301-redirected). If you delete and move to another sub-domain, you'll lose that age.
Good point. Guess I need to return to my previous thoughts...just add to my existing categories here and there...then wait and see.
I'm wrestling with the exact same dilemma, but as my traffic is holding steady, I'm taking the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" approach.
Of course, my traffic is still below pre-Panda levels and there's always that niggling question - would it improve further if I made some changes??
As my hubs did well post subdomain, initially, I am wondering if the 19 new hubs I put up somehow diluted the rest? They will not have a 301 re-direct on them as there was nothing to re-direct to. So they are brand new articles with no links, no age, nothing. Our hubs previously started out with the full weight of Hubpages platform behind them, and now they don't.
I'm possibly a little confused on that issue, but new hubs should theoretically struggle, no matter how well your subdomain is doing up to that point, because they are brand new in all senses of the word.
Unless somehow or other they start out with 301 redirects on them?
I removed all the RSS feeds and now my traffic has collapsed!!
I'm over all this, See Yah in a month or so!
Best Wishes
On Sunday!
I suspect that the loss of links may have affected things.
I'll work elsewhere for a month or so. My adsense returns are up on other sites.
I'm working on this http://www.a1niches.com/
and http://www.a1niches.com/nichesforaccidents.html as an example
This is very interesting, especially as your traffic dropped right after it, so not a panda slap but something else.
I'm just glad now that I reduced rather than removed links. I have seen no change in traffic.
Good idea to work on other stuff just now.
I put up two new hubs since the subdomain. That's not much, but it is almost 10% of my total number. The new hubs are doing no better and no worse than the others. Most hubs are still getting very few views, but most are getting at least one view every day, and some are getting more than 2, whereas post-Panda it was 0-2 views per day, mainly 0.
The total number of views is double to what it was immediately after Panda.
Unfortunately, HP Ad earnings are not reflecting the rise in views, which is something I struggle to understand. I'm getting maybe 50% more in ads earnings rather than double and am still earning at a rate of less than $5 per month. Adsense clicks are pretty well non-existent. I get about one click every 1-2 weeks and this month have earned less that 50p. Because I've always had so little with Adsense and clicks have always been rare (it took me 15 months to reach payout before Panda), I cannot decide whether it's worth switching off HP Ads or not.
In all my 21 months, I have earned less than $30 with Amazon.
My adsense never returned to pre-panda levels. I suppose that is because of the ad position now, but mine went from the expect 1-2 clicks every 100 views to 1-2 clicks every 1000, which is a massive drop. This is even with Hubads switched off.
HPads and adsense together seems to bring me in more money that adsense alone, but even so the drop from previous earnings is very noticeable.
My Amazon is not doing too badly considering my drop in views, though it's obviously down on previous levels.
Izzy - That is an interesting thought. I too put up a bunch of new articles after the subdomain switch and have dropped drastically. Is that something all of us "plummeters" have in common?
I think part of the clue lies in the spammers copying your content so your site is labelled as a spam. I note that you have always been really clear and honest about what you have achieved and I for one appreciate it- however I bet the spammers read it too!
I woke up wondering if it would be a good idea for those affected by the drop to open another account, giving absoluelty no indication of any link, publish and keep quiet and just see what happens.
Luckily I was not affected by the drop but have seen an increase of around 30 per cent which may be due to new hubs written, so not a plunger but not a soarer either, just plodding along!
Glad to see you are increasing, and 30% is great
Interesting observations about my openness, but I know someone else here who doesn't ever mention their stats on the forums, but whose stats have been similar to mine all along, and who has also become a plunger.
Their work is also copied all over the net, of course finding copied work is easy now that our hubs have mainly disappeared from view.
I have about 5/7 hubs holding my whole subdomain together and giving me views. The rest are dead as dodos.
Another theory blown out of the water!" arrgh!
No - I'm a big time "plummeter" and I have not published anything since the subdomain switch...
Not much for me either. Google or HP is responsible, in my opinion.
Although my hits haven't fallen in count, I haven't made a cent in Adsense or my Amazon sales in weeks.
I'm just going to let my hubs sit and not do a d*mn thing with them, and I'm also not adding any new ones, even though I have several that I wanted to do...
I don't want to give up on this place, and I won't, but I am not encouraged to do anything at the moment, so I'll work on other things for awhile...and watch to see what happens on here.
I hope someone figures something out soon...for all of us!
I don't usually comment, but I think my experience might be enlightening for some.
Let me preface these comments by saying my profile is four years old, has over 1,700 hand written hubs and has received over 13 million hits. I wasn't affected by Panda in the slightest, in fact my revenues increased over that period.
Post sub-domain switch, my Google traffic is gone. I mean, pretty much entirely dried up. I used to get 30 k hits per day. I now get under 16k. My daily hits have halved and so have my earnings. What traffic I do have is being driven by the blogs I established to drive traffic to Hub Pages.
I'm extremely concerned about this. Personally (and I could be wrong) but I think it is a result of losing authority in the subdomain switch. For the first days after the switch, my numbers remained steady, then they plummeted as others are reporting. This doesn't surprise me, I've seen that happen before on other blogs I've redirected. What does surprise me is the number of people who haven't been affected at all or who are reporting increases in traffic. I don't fully understand how some could be completely unaffected and others are getting slammed hard.
I would say that it's probably best to hang in there. Odds are, rankings and traffic will return naturally if your content is good. It's not a small matter in the eyes of the Google to take thousands of articles and shove them onto a new subdomain, 301 or not.
Same here. Why are some affected and some not? So far no one knows. My Google traffic is almost non-existent now. I consider this almost criminal because of the money it is costing those of us who diligently tried to follow the rules put down by both HP and Google. Too bad we don't have anyone to tell us what we did wrong.
Thanks for commenting Hope and please may I say you are EXACTLY the sort of person we need to hear from more regularly on the forums. That's a serious amount of hubs, years of experience, and from where I'm sat, an amazing traffic count.
One thing we are hoping to get out of the move to subdomains is a better understanding of what does well and what doesn't. I'm hoping we can all continue to learn and adapt to the new environment. If this is Panda getting applied to subdomains (not positive at this point - it's important to remember Panda is still evolving and updating) then isolating content is ultimately going to help us figure out what correlates with healthy subdomains and to educate people on those practices.
@Hope Alexander and Randy Godwin - I think there is something about the readability, and what makes content interesting between accounts that are holding and going up vs those that are going down. Read your Hubs out loud and see how they sound to you (Hope, I don't know anything about Minecraft, so yours may be fine). I haven't found one account going down where the majority of Hubs reads well to me.
@Hope Alexander, your drop in traffic was pretty isolated from other people falling. There is always some flux across HubPages with some pages going in and out of rankings, but usually not site wide. I'd encourage you to file a reinclusion request with Google.
Lastly, we followed best practices for moving a site to a new site as we transitioned to subdomains. One thing Google encourages is people to update their external links to the new page. While this is impossible in most circumstances, for the links you do control it is a recommended practice.
I have a question - I noticed that as I tried to link my Google Analytics to my Adsense account I noticed that my Analytics account is showing my profile address from before the subdomain switch.
Is that something that I need to change or is it something that has not been done yet by Hubpages?
I write content for my three personal blogs as well as have close to 150 pages on Squidoo, none of which have taken a hit in traffic. That is why I don't believe your statement above holds much water. It is not like I write one way on HP and another way on other platforms, I write how I write. If google didn't like how my pages read, I would have taken a hit across all of the platforms I write content on, wouldn't I have? I know you are just trying to help and if we are losing traffic and sales then HP is also taking a hit. But, I am not sure I buy your latest conclusion.
Totally agree. None of my own sites nor articles on other platforms have taken a dive at all. I really don't buy this latest theory about writing style. It doesn't mesh with my own statistics and data. I also don't really think my writing is so bad since I won the Helpful Health Hubs contest (as wordscribe41) and a hub of mine (on another account) was picked as Hub of the day 2 days ago.
I'm so glad you guys are with me on this. If it was only my subdomain that plunged I'd be away in a corner thinking really bad thoughts about myself and my abilities.
As it is, the subdomain switch has brought new problems. No longer are we judged together, and so there is a division.
Those who are doing well from the changes can bask in the glory of returned traffic and earnings.
Those who are not doing well feel demonized. Outsiders who feel their hard work judged and found wanting.
And for a true writer, that is hard to take.
I consider myself a writer, not the best in the world, not a published author, but I can write the best sympathy letter when I put my mind to it (I've been told many times).
I once wrote a letter to a hospital administrator stating categorically why I would NOT pay the ambulance bill for the woman who stepped out in front of my taxi while under the influence.
I wish I'd had a copy because that man phoned me up and told me to forget the bill (which was a legal requirement, apparently) as I had made his day!
Ok I have no idea about sales copy for Amazon hubs, but I make it up as I go along and it seems to work.
Or did! Now I have been well and truly slapped and I do not need telling that my hubs don't read well or some suchs.
I hate the divisiveness that is apparent now. Roll on Panda 2.5, let's achieve some parity.
To Wordscribe/Hope Alexander/Janet: don't argue with logic and hard evidence, you'll just be ignored.
I suppose that's why my best hubs have visitors who say my RV articles are the best on the internet for good advice and are also easy for the DIY RV owner to follow. These people link my articles for me, but I suppose Google had rather have artificial links instead. I would like to be out from under Google completely if it is possible. Go Bing and Yahoo! No comment on your opinion of my writing style. Nor on yours either.
Paul, are you seriously saying Google's robots are able to read out loud, and that they're able to judge how they sound????
If not, can you explain how Google's robots are judging "readability"?
I think that's the stupidest suggestion I've ever heard.
Hi Marisa! Did you happen to see Paul's comment on Ryankett's recent hub?
Yes I did. I also noticed another comment which mentioned that you're inclined to repeat your keywords in your titles. That could well be one of your problems, and it could be Izzy's as well.
Just the other day I was reading a suggestion that the new Panda looks for repeated words in titles. The rationale is that if you're writing naturally, it shouldn't be necessary to repeat the same word twice in a short heading - so if you have repeated it, that suggests you're conscious of using keywords and are trying to shoehorn extra ones in.
It may well be that you naturally repeat the words to amplify the meaning, but it seems to me it would be worth editing your titles to avoid repetition, just in case this suggestion is true.
Yes, I did see thooghun's comment and that fact is true about some - or maybe many - of my titles and I will certainly work on that...although Ryankett mentioned that he has some hubs wherein he's done that with his titles and he has not suffered a traffic decline.
Marisa, I'm not Paul, I'm not affiliated with him, and I'm not even gonna play him in the movie, but...sort of, yes, that's more or less what Google is trying to do with search. They're not using bots to do it, but their algorithm, which is a form of artificial intelligence. It uses semantic signals and user signals to understand (not very well yet) the nature of what is written.
The reading aloud test Paul did isn't really about how the words physically sound and flow; it's one way we humans can try to minimize bias when we evaluate text - we process the text differently when it's received that way. A similar thing can often be accomplished by the old self-critiquing trick of changing the font and layout of the text.
I can't emphasize enough how much we can learn about the way Google thinks and what they're capable of by skimming through their patents. If you care to strain your brain a bit, and have some extra time, it's really worth it to take a few days or even a week to look through a bunch of them. And not just the ones that have been granted. There are some really interesting ones that are still at the "filed" stage.
I'm still not understanding what people should be looking for when they're reading the text out loud, then. You're saying, don't consider whether it flows well - which is what Paul said to consider. So what should they be looking for?
Lily Rose and Randy Godwin both write naturally, they're not SEO writers. I'm sure you're not telling them they can't write, but if you're saying there's something they need to improve, we need more than vague "semantic signals" and "user signals".
It is an SEO heresy to suggest Google is using user metrics (read time, page visits per site etc) rather than inbound links to rate a page. At the same time, Mark Cutts suggests readability is a significant factor in how well a page does. So it is a mystery.
https://plus.google.com/109412257237874 … 6dfG2piaYu
I started to put Paul's advice in to action. I started to rewrite my hubs that were keyword stuffed and honestly poorly written. But I decided to Google them before I unpublish them. And I found this : hxxp://www.zimbio.com/Furniture+101/articles/_yaax1ssNsL/Best+PC+Gaming+Chair - the exact copy of my hubs 'Best PC Gaming Chair'. I wrote the hub while I was taking English courses and learning English. And it is very poorly written so copying it is quite pathetic. Although I copied two sentences from Cnet myself , but those hubs are unpublished now.
How to report a content thief to Google?
Thank you in advance!
"I haven't found one account going down where the majority of Hubs reads well to me."
Guess that's me told then!
Huh?!?
I'm not renowned for my thin skin, but I find that quite insulting.
OK then Paul, how do you explain the fact that the hubs in my #2 account have taken a traffic nosedive that exactly mirrors the one shown in Psyche's graph, while the hubs on my Empress Felicity account are actually doing OK trafficwise?
The hubs on both accounts are written in precisely the same style. OK, so my #2 hubs are all sales hubs but I have a hard time believing their salesy nature is to blame for their downfall - otherwise people like CMHypno, Psyche and Amanda Severn (who all have mostly non-sales hubs or a mixture of hubs) would not have experienced a "plunge".
"I haven't found one account going down where the majority of Hubs reads well to me."
Sorry to be pedantic but........ should it not read....... "where the majority of Hubs read well to me"........
No, because "majority" is singular and forms the subject of the clause, therefore "reads"
If it was "most hubs" then you would need "read"
Glad you explained that, because I would have thought caseworker was right and that it should be 'reads' nor read'.
What would I know, I am just a plunger!
Well, I'm not a plunger at the moment, but I'm not an earner either.
I am very attuned to grammar and style. Unfortunately, this seems to make little difference to success. Someone who crows a lot about earnings here produces hubs that I consider to be semi-literate and valueless...
and I don't mean you, Izzy!!!
+1.
Although I consider "+1" to be typical of the vacuous, pointless, crappy and moronic style that the internet world seems to like.
Today is not a good day.
I think it is a fair comment. (not judging anyone's writing styles myself).
I am open to - and have received - suggestions on what to do to make things better. I am more than willing to suck up my pride and make changes in order to restore my income. I was making a reasonable amount each month (enough where it is worth my time to make my subdomain better).
I unpublished about 80 of my worst performing hubs and removed RSS feeds from all remaining ones. I have also taken his advice and will be reworking my best performing articles to make them more authoritative. Of course, I still reserve the right to whine and complain!
Maybe I am a good writer. Maybe not. At the end of the day, I'm not happy with where my subdomain is performing and it is worth my while to do something about it.
Writing Nelle Hoxie style hubs worked well for me over the past year but there certainly is reason to believe that adjustments need to be made to keep them performing in the future. The million dollar question is what those adjustments need to be. We have some ideas out there. Let's make them and see how the accounts respond!
You know, I don't have to come online to be insulted, I get plenty of that at home ("oh, you're on that computer again, that's just a waste of time" etc etc every bloody day!).
I just went through nearly 500 hubs changing rss feeds, and I've got a mountain ahead of me getting rid of copied content all over the web.
If I am going to unpublish hubs, it will be after I have filed every DMCA going and got every last copy taken down, because only then can I safely move my poorer performing hubs - which is about 485 of them, to my own domains where I am quite sure they will do better than they ever have done or will do here.
I knew people would find that offensive.
This really is highly offensive Paul and would have been better left out altogether.
I think it quite possible you have managed to offend everyone who is suffering from fallen traffic.
And then, correct me if I am wrong, you have finished off by suggesting we manually backlink our hubs. I thought this was frowned upon?
Apart form anything else, this is a huge amount of work for those of us with large numbers of hubs, especially those of us who already backlinked hubs as they were published.
Can you possibly provide software to help us out?
I'm sorry if that comment was offensive. I'm not saying the Hubs deserve to go down in traffic, but hoping to help people see things in their Hubs and to compare them to Hubs doing well so they can figure out a path to success. We know for people losing traffic that it's incredibly frustrating, confusing and time consuming to learn how to be successful.
One test I've been doing myself is reading Hubs out loud to people and asking them to rate Hubs on a 1 - 10 scale and for feedback where I compare sites doing well vs sites going down.
I'm seeing significant correlation between accounts doing much better where people rate the Hubs noticeably higher when I read it to them. (I don't let them read it or see the layout - they just listen to the content being read).
Accounts doing well are getting 7 to 8+ ratings and comments like it draws on personal experience, the author really likes the subject, and I don't feel like I'm trying to be sold something (once they've heard multiple hubs).
Accounts doing poorly are getting 4 to 6 ratings with questions like why do they repeat the word so much, and I feel like I'm getting sold something.
Previously I pointed out a few people doing well like Ryankett and someone going down like Mutiny98. I'd suggest doing the same test with your content and see what feedback you can get.
Again, the intention is to be helpful and sorry if it feels like critisim on the content folks have created. We have an incredibly strong interest in everyone doing well and we are going to continue to work on educating people how to be successful. I think there is a significant stylistic aspect to the content doing well vs going down today. Google is playing editor, so the hope is understanding what their algorithm considers quality.
But we are not supposed to write personal hubs since that is a reason for a hub to be flagged...
We can use our imaginations and make it up, writeangled
My sexy cat is going to get an overhaul telling the story of when I turned into a cat, or perhaps I was attacked by a cat, something like that.
It has to be a sexy cat of course! Might even have been an alien sexy cat, or even a sheep in a cat costume which brings a new twist to the old story about a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Purely personal Hubs ("I went to work today and had lunch with Deb...") are not allowed. However, adding a relevant personal dimension to an informative Hub is most definitely allowed and always has been; it's actually encouraged, now more than ever.
The bar we've used is "Would this be interesting or useful to someone who doesn't already know you?" If you can answer that in the affirmative, then it is within our rules.
Actually I am quite interested. Whose Deb?
Thankyou for that detailed reply Paul.
Unfortunately I have no-one to read my stuff aloud to...off to cry
(no-one else speaks English in my house)
I will just need to read it to myself.
"Google is playing editor, so the hope is understanding what their algorithm considers quality."
YES - we need to understanding this.
"I'm seeing significant correlation between accounts doing much better where people rate the Hubs noticeably higher when I read it to them."
NO - this is not helpful - It is subjective. There may be a correlation but this does not establish a cause and effect. It does not provide advice that anyone can follow. I think it is presumptuous to blame the authors when the turmoil of the subdomain shift is is still raging, especially when everyone is doing this, then doing that, then doing this again (linking, RSS, duplication, etc., etc.). It is a cop out to say in the current climate that the good authors do well and the poor authors do badly. Clearly many of the best authors have been badly hit - it is wrong to label their hubs as being of poor quality as there are likely to be many reasons including the turmoil of the subdomain shift. Your advice to read the hubs out loud is unhelpful as it clearly does not relate to what Google actually uses is judge quality - this is what we need advice about.
On a positive note it is good to see Lazarus rising! Time is the cure!
My real concern is about hubs being copied, published elsewhere and then outranking the original. This is the killer as it is a lost cause trying to find and report every one - it will keep happening. The only hope is to OUTRANK the bast**ds - but if our page ranks decline - this too will fail. Paul E has suggested this as a strategy, but its flawed in the current climate of turmoil. Perhaps Google will see the copies as the original and penalise the original author for duplication. Authors will look elsewhere for sites where their articles can get higher ranks - this may be the only hope.
Has Hubpages looked at installing copy protection tools? Please consider this.
This is the worst I have heard on the subject so far... I guess it is time to look at greener pastures.
You guys, seriously? I think it would be pretty awesome if it were readability at issue, because that is something we can control. Even with good writers, writing isn't always effective. That's why there are editors. We don't have the advantage of editors, so all we have is the opinion of readership - including Paul's opinion, which, because of his access to data, is seriously well-informed.
Most of us have been writing partially for search engines because that was our job, because search engines were not very smart. We've been dividing our writing into two categories: "quality, unique content" and "purely illiterate spun scummy spam." We all know which is which.
But our readers are smarter - they can detect all ranges of quality - or as they put it, they know what they like and what they don't like, what meets their needs and what doesn't. And Google's search algorithm is trying to learn to detect these signals as well as a human. Panda is a part of Google's larger agenda to evaluate the huge body of mid-quality stuff that has populated the Internet in the last few years - stuff they couldn't distinguish between very well before.
Google's most recent messages are emphatic on the "write for your user" message, suggesting they've recently gained confidence in how well they interpret quality and relevance for a search.
So absolutely the most important thing that we should be listening to is the opinion of people who read our hubs. Not in a "But I'm a good writer!" kinda way, but in a "Damn you, you might have a point" kind of way.
Regarding backlinks...by "for the links you do control" doesn't he mean Facebook, Twitter, etc.?
Yikes. Hubs don't read well?
Hm. Well. Although this comment wasn't directed squarely at me, I do have something to say about it. My sites that drive traffic to Hub Pages aren't suffering from this issue. It's only my hubs that have been negatively affected. That experience is being mirrored by others.
I think sometimes HP has a tendency to shift 'blame' as it were, to the hubbers themselves, when external forces that have nothing to do with them, or the quality of their work come in to play.
Fact of the matter is, redirecting a domain causes trouble with Google. Always has, and probably always will. There is also other hubbers' very valid concerns that having been copied in the past, a hub may very well be outranked by the thief once the original is redirected. These are facts that have nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with how well the writer writes, how well they know their subject, or how readable their articles are.
A lot of the people reporting increases in traffic seem to be the ones who were affected strongly by Panda. They'd already fallen in rank (through largely no fault of their own) and really can only go up.
I wasn't affected strongly by Panda. Yes, I saw a little dip as did all of HP, but at a time when people were being warned about their 'substandard' hubs (which in some cases were substandard, and in others, merely failed to conform to a new set of requirements) my profile continued to perform. The only change that significantly affected my account was the subdomain switch. That's it.
The good news in all of this is that subdomain switches usually recover after a time. I know this, because I've been here before. This isn't the end of the world for anyone plunging. I'll look into a re-inclusion request, and anyone else with a significant issue like mine probably should too.
But in the meantime, I would strongly caution against pointing too many fingers at hubbers, especially those who know their fields, are well qualified to write the hubs they write and have invested significant time in their work. Hub Pages just seriously changed the structure of the site, which, for what it is worth, I think was a good idea. I hope it works the way it is supposed to. However in the short to medium term, some of us who were doing well may very well get slammed - and insinuating that it must have something to do with how the articles are written whilst failing to acknowledge the sort of very real ranking damage a redirect can do just isn't fair.
My understanding of this is that we don't know for sure if Panda was actually applied to every site in the index, but rather to certain sites with certain signals (perhaps traffic volume?).
Google doesn't have the same volume of data on all sites and all queries because of traffic variance and Chrome toolbar usage variance, and I'd expect their confidence to diminish with the extent of their data. I mean, they're mostly run by data, so it just makes sense that they wouldn't hit low-data sites the same way as high-data sites. Enough sites all over the web seem to have been "wrongly hit" that it looks like their cut-off may have been too generous, but I'm pretty sure there would have been a cut-off at some level.
And I also think that some types of sites have different combinations of factors that apply - for example, HubPages before the subdomain and the "new and improved" HubPages after the domain are two different types of sites, and so are personal blogs or niche affiliate sites or whatever. It's like if there were a Saks Fifth Avenue located in a tiny town in rural Nebraska. It's the same store, but its success is evaluated differently because of where it is. There are MULTIPLE instances of the same type of content being pandalized on one site and improving rankings after Panda on another site. But that doesn't mean it's not the content at fault. I wouldn't put a Saks in an agrarian town with a population of 500 - it's my job to put the right store there for my market. And Cutts has effectively said that certain kinds of queries need certain kinds of authority: authority-based health articles are fine if they're on WebMD, for example, but on article sites, they're really hard to rank now.
I'm pretty sure that Google's Panda is evaluating content based on a bunch of things. It's saying, "Does a Saks belong in Tecumseh, Nebraska?" (I.e., Is the site an authority for the query) And it's also saying "How are the store visitors reacting to Saks?" and "Does the store look like a good one to be in?" and "Is it a real store or a mock-up?" It can't ask for certifications of authenticity and expertise, so it looks for clues. We can't predict those clues at all. But what they do say, over and over again, is write for your user. I think it's even more important to do so when writing on a general topic article site.
Anyway, I'm afraid I'm offending folks here and hesitate to post again on this issue, so let me know if this is at all helpful or if I'm wasting my time. I really do think Paul is onto something, but I'm not sure. He could be utterly wrong. But I am having trouble understanding why someone would want to modify a hub's feeds but NOT want to try modifying its writing. They're just words, tools to use, and no expert hits it right as far as reader's go every time, or else, as I said, we wouldn't need editors. Ever read Hegel or Kant? They knew their stuff, but geez, they did not write for their reader! Even favorite fiction writers don't always hit it right.
I wish I'd known that. I don't recall HubPages explaining the risks, though maybe I missed something.
Actually I wish I'd known it myself, because I 301 redirected one of my own websites, thinking it would pass on the "link juice" - and the new website has been Panda'd, just like some Hubbers' new domains.
by Baileybear 13 years ago
My HP ads have earnt less than a dollar so far this month. Previously, was earning around $12 per month. Traffic dropped, but not nearly as much as earnings.
by ARainey 9 years ago
Hello,I've been on hubpages for about a week. There is only traffic from hubpages and mturk on my traffic tab. How long will it before I start to get traffic from google. All of my articles are featured and I don't want to lose it from lack of google traffic. Thanks!
by aa lite 12 years ago
This might be a complete co-incidence, but I switched to the new profile a couple of days ago, and today Google is pretending it doesn't know me. Hubs that ranked on the first page for main keyword are not found in the first 10 pages. Even more worrying, I can't find them in Google even...
by Nathan Bernardo 5 years ago
I have had articles that started getting traffic from Google within a couple days. Most of them I think take a little longer but it surprises me when Google traffic comes in within a couple days. Curious if anyone knows why that is. Is the article actually on results pages for keyphrases/words or...
by Brian Dooling 13 years ago
After having a few really good days of traffic via Facebook and months of steady traffic from google, it's gone!!! The last few days I've been hovering around 20 views a day which I haven't had for more then two days in a row since last August, a month after joining! Was there a new google panda...
by Sherry Hewins 13 years ago
This hub of mine was Hub of the Day when I had been a member of HubPages for only 6 days. I got plenty of praise for it, and it was quite popular around Christmas time. I really like it, and I like the title of it too. But I don't think Google does. Do you think I should change the title to...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |